Book contents
- Human Rights in a Time of Populism
- Human Rights in a Time of Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Populist Threats to the International Human Rights System
- 2 US Human Rights Policy and the Trump Administration
- 3 Rule-of-Law Rights and Populist Impatience
- 4 Populism and Human Rights in Poland
- 5 The Legal Architecture of Populism
- 6 Representation, Paternalism, and Exclusion
- 7 Penal Populism in Emerging Markets
- 8 The Populist Threat to Democracy in Myanmar
- 9 In Defense of Democratic Populism
- 10 Populism and International Human Rights Law Institutions
- 11 Human Rights Responses to the Populist Challenge
- Index
- References
11 - Human Rights Responses to the Populist Challenge
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- Human Rights in a Time of Populism
- Human Rights in a Time of Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Populist Threats to the International Human Rights System
- 2 US Human Rights Policy and the Trump Administration
- 3 Rule-of-Law Rights and Populist Impatience
- 4 Populism and Human Rights in Poland
- 5 The Legal Architecture of Populism
- 6 Representation, Paternalism, and Exclusion
- 7 Penal Populism in Emerging Markets
- 8 The Populist Threat to Democracy in Myanmar
- 9 In Defense of Democratic Populism
- 10 Populism and International Human Rights Law Institutions
- 11 Human Rights Responses to the Populist Challenge
- Index
- References
Summary
This concluding essay draws on the insights of earlier chapters and provides the author's own conclusions regarding how monitoring bodies in the human rights system should deal with the challenges created by the current wave of exclusionary populism. As the varied accounts illustrate, one size does not fit all. Moreover, international human rights institutions should not address populism as such, but should rather continue to focus on the specific human rights violations that populism leads to, and on the violations that have contributed to the rise of populism. Meanwhile, human rights institutions should also be attentive to the criticisms that populists have directed against the international human rights system, some of which (as examples show) may be meritorious even within a human rights analysis. These recommendations would not solve the problem that the spread of populism poses, but they would enable human rights institutions to contribute positively toward particular solutions.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Rights in a Time of PopulismChallenges and Responses, pp. 250 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alston, Philip. “Hobbling the Monitors: Should U.N. Human Rights Monitors be Accountable?” Harvard International Law Journal 52, no. 2 (2011): 561–649.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/32/31 (2016).Google Scholar
Alston, Philip. “The Populist Challenge to Human Rights.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 9, no. 1 (2017): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Report of the Special Rapporteur on Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Rights (SRESCER). OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 10 (2017).Google Scholar
Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní. “To Detain Lawfully or Not to Detain: Reflections on UK Supreme Court Decision in Serdar Mohammed.” Just Security, February 2, 2017. www.justsecurity.org/37013/detain‑lawfully‑detain‑question‑reflection‑uk‑supreme‑court‑decision‑serdar‑mohammed/.Google Scholar
Aslandis, Paris. “Populism and Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira et al., 305–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A.. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611–639.Google Scholar
Cetra, Raísa, and Nascimento, Jefferson, “Counting Coins: Funding the Inter-American Human Rights System.” In Maia, Camila Barretto et al., The Inter-American Human Rights System: Changing Times, Ongoing Challenges, 53–94. Washington, DC: Due Process of Law Foundation, 2016.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the Shadow of Purposive Competence.” European Law Journal 21, no. 1 (2015): 2–22.Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin. “Populism, Exclusion, Post-truth. Some Conceptual Caveats.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management 7, no. 3 (2018): 268–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Paz González, Isaac. The Social Rights Jurisprudence in the Inter‑American Court of Human Rights: Shadow and Light in International Human Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar
Egan, Suzanne. “Strengthening the United Nations Treaty Body System.” Human Rights Law Review 13, no. 2 (2013): 209–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, Richard. “Lawfare Against the Armed Forces Must Be on the Next Government’s Agenda,” May 15, 2017. https://policyexchange.org.uk/lawfare‑against‑the‑armed‑forces‑must‑be‑on‑the‑next‑governments‑agenda/.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen, Miller, Zinaida, and Davis, D.M., eds. Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission for Democracy Through Law. Report on Term-Limits: Part I – Presidents, CDL-AD (2018)010 (2018).Google Scholar
European Commission for Democracy Through Law. Report on Term-Limits: Part II – Members of Parliament; Part III – Representatives Elected at Sub-National and Local Level and Executive Officials Elected at Sub-National and Local Level, CDL-AD (2019)007 (2019).Google Scholar
European Court Verdict Prompts Italy Immigration “Re-think.” Agence France Press, February 23, 2012, Nexis Uni.Google Scholar
Filc, Dani. “Populism in the Middle East.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, ed. de la Torre, Carlos, 385–401. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “Judicial Power: Past, Present and Future.” In Judicial Power and the Balance of Our Constitution: Two Lectures by John Finnis, ed. Ekins, Richard, 26–61. London: Policy Exchange, 2018.Google Scholar
Genser, Jared M. “The Intersection of Politics and International Law: The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in Theory and in Practice.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 39, no. 3 (2008): 687–755.Google Scholar
Gillett, Francesca. Theresa May Attacks ‘Left-Wing Human Rights Lawyers Harassing UK Troops.’ Evening Standard, October 5, 2016. www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/theresa‑may‑attacks‑leftwing‑human‑rights‑lawyers‑harassing‑uk‑troops‑a3361716.html.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Melton, James, and Elkins, Zachary. “On the Evasion of Executive Term Limits.” William and Mary Law Review 52, no. 6 (2011), 1807–1872.Google Scholar
Landau, David. “Presidential Term Limits in Latin America: A Critical Analysis of the Migration of the Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Doctrine.” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 12, no. 2 (2018): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Siobhán. “Deportation and the Human Rights Act 1998: Debunking the Myths.” In Critically Examining the Case Against the 1998 Human Rights Act, ed. Cowell, Frederick, 136–150. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
McKinstry, Leo. Human Right’s Act [sic] Has Become the Villain’s Charter. Express, October 23, 2011.Google Scholar
Mead, David. “‘You Couldn’t Make it Up’: Some Narratives of the Media’s Coverage of Human Rights.” In The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship?, ed. Ziegler, Katja, Wicks, Elizabeth, and Hodson, Loveday, 453–472. Oxford: Hart, 2015.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. “Populism in Australia and New Zealand.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira et al., 121–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. “Giving Meaning and Effect to Human Rights: The Contributions of Human Rights Committee Members.” In The Human Rights Covenants at 50: Their Past, Present, and Future, ed. Moeckli, Daniel, Keller, Helen, and Heri, Corina. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Teun. “Measuring Populism: A Review of Current Approaches.” In Political Populism: A Handbook, ed. Heinisch, Reinhard C., Holtz-Bacha, Christina, and Mazzoleni, Oscar, 123–136. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.Google Scholar
Pejic, Jelena. “The European Court of Human Rights’ Al-Jedda Judgment: The Oversight of International Humanitarian Law.” International Red Cross Review 93 (2011): 837–851.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César, and Gomez, Krizna. “Responding to the Populist Challenge: A New Playbook for the Human Rights Field.” In A New Playbook for Human Rights Actors, ed. Rodríguez-Garavito, César and Gomez, Krizna, 11–53. Bogotá: Dejusticia, 2018, 39.Google Scholar
Ruzza, Carlo. “Populism, Migration and Xenophobia in Europa.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, ed. de la Torre, Carlos, 201–215. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Salazar, Katya. “Between Reality and Appearances.” Aportes DPLf 19 (April 2014): 16–19.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Markus. “Servicing and Financing Human Rights Supervisory Bodies.” In The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring, ed. Alston, Philip and Crawford, James, 482–484. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Steger, Wayne. “Populist Waves in the 2016 Presidential Nominations: Another Limit to the Party Decides Thesis.” In The State of the Parties, 2018, ed. Green, John C., Coffey, Daniel J., and Cohen, David B.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. “Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 3 (2004): 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar