Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:12:46.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Pythagoreanism in the Academic tradition: the Early Academy to Numenius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2014

John Dillon
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Carl A. Huffman
Affiliation:
DePauw University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Whatever may be said about Plato himself, there can be no doubt that Pythagoras and the Pythagorean tradition were major influences on his successors. Indeed, it may be claimed that the lineaments of what was to become the movement denominated in modern times “Neopythagoreanism” was given its impetus by the work of such figures in particular as Xenocrates and Heraclides of Pontus, though to a considerable extent also by Plato's immediate successor Speusippus. If we ask what are the salient characteristics of this intellectual movement or tendency in later Greco-Roman culture, I would propose the following: Neopythagoreanism is a branch of Platonism that emphasizes the role of number in the cosmos and which regards Pythagoreanism as the origin of this emphasis. Neopythagoreans thus show devotion to what they chose to regard as the basic principles of the Pythagorean philosophical system, the One and the Indefinite Dyad, although these principles are, in fact, Platonic. Neopythagoreans were Platonists and not themselves directly affiliated to anything that could be described as a Pythagorean “school,” although a few of them may also have followed to varying extents the Pythagorean way of life, or bios.

The Old Academy: Speusippus

If we turn first to Plato's nephew and successor Speusippus, we find, in his admittedly exiguous remains, some significant traces of “Neopythagoreanism.” His adoption of the One and Multiplicity (plēthos) as first principles need not be regarded as in itself “Pythagorean,” as it is simply an adaptation of Plato's “unwritten” doctrine of principles (itself, of course, indebted to the Pythagorean tradition), but in a passage preserved by Proclus in his Commentary on the Parmenides (Book 7 38.32–40.7 Klibansky), Speusippus attributes his system of first principles to “the ancients,” by which he undoubtedly means the Pythagoreans.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×