Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4hcbs Total loading time: 5.268 Render date: 2021-12-02T02:18:48.960Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Section 1 - Prepregnancy Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
University of Newcastle
Get access


Each pregnancy is a unique, physiologically normal episode in a woman’s life. However, preexisting disease or unexpected illness of the mother and/or the fetus may complicate the pregnancy.

High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 1 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Barker, DJ, Thornburg, KL. The obstetric origins of health for a lifetime. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 511–19. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31829cb9ca.
Ferraro, ZM, Gaudet, L, Adamo, KB. The potential impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 99110. doi:10.1097/OGX.0b013e318242030e.
Flodgren, G, Gonçalves-Bradley, DC, Summerbell, CD. Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in children and adults with overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11: CD000984.
Kane, P (ed.). Women and Occupational Health: Issues and Policy Paper for the Global Commission of Women’s Health. Geneva: WHO Press, 1999. (accessed June 2019).
Kramer, MS, Séguin, L, Lydon, J, Goulet, L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: Why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000; 14: 194210.
Mottola, MF, Davenport, MH, Ruchat, SM, et al. 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 1339–46. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-100056.
Organization, World Health. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care: a Guide for Essential Practice, 3rd edn. Geneva: WHO Press, 2015. (accessed June 2019).
Kramer, MS, Zhang, X, Platt, RW. Analyzing risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179: 361–7. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Graaf, JP, Steegers, EA, Bonsel, GJ. Inequalities in perinatal and maternal health. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25: 98108.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67: 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiono, PH, Klebanoff, MA, Graubard, BI, et al. Birth weight among women of different ethnic groups. JAMA 1986; 255: 4852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, E, Ryan, KJ, Monson, RR, Schoenbaum, SC. Risk factors accounting for racial differences in the rate of premature birth. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 743–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Séguin, L, Lydon, J, Goulet, L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000; 14: 194210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, J, Lee, AC, Kozuki, N, Lawn, JE, et al.; CHERG Small-for-Gestational-Age-Preterm Birth Working Group. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 417–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paneth, N, Wallenstein, S, Kiely, JL, Susser, M. Social class indicators and mortality in low birth weight infants. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 364–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrman, RE. Premature births among black women. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 763–5.Google Scholar
Rahbar, F, Momeni, J, Fomufod, A, Westney, L. Prenatal care and perinatal mortality in a black population. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 327–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Refugee and migrant health. (accessed March 2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paquier, L, Barlow, P, Paesmans, M, Rozenberg, S. Do recent immigrants have similar obstetrical care and perinatal complications as long-term residents? A retrospective exploratory cohort study in Brussels. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (3): e029683. ScholarPubMed
de Jong, L, Pavlova, M, Winters, M, Rechel, B. A systematic literature review on the use and outcomes of maternal and child healthcare services by undocumented migrants in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2017; 27: 990–7. ScholarPubMed
Tuck, SM, Cadozo, LD, Studd, JWW, Gibb, DMF. Obstetric characteristics in different racial groups. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 892–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, ND. Engagement of the fetal head in the Negro primigravida. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88: 1086–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw-Taylor, Y. Culturally and linguistically appropriate health care for racial or ethnic minorities: analysis of the US Office of Minority Health’s recommended standards. Health Policy 2002; 62: 211–21.Google Scholar
Traeger-Synodinos, J, Harteveld, CL, Old, JM, et al. EMQN Best Practice Guidelines for molecular and haematology methods for carrier identification and prenatal diagnosis of the haemoglobinopathies. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23: 426–37.Google Scholar
Bohren, MA, Hofmeyr, GJ, Sakala, C, Fukuzawa, RK, Cuthbert, A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017 (7): CD003766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, AS, Washington, S, Kuppermann, M, Cheng, YW, Caughey, AB. Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23: 454–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Kakuma, R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Aug 15; 8: CD003517.Google ScholarPubMed
Garg, M. Uptake of family planning services among an ethnically mixed population in a general practice setting. Br J Fam Plann 1998; 24: 82–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baranowski, T, Bee, DE, Rassin, DK, et al. Social support, social influence, ethnicity and the breastfeeding decision. Soc Sci Med 1983; 17: 1599–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farahi, N, Zolotor, A. Recommendations for preconception counseling and care. Am Fam Physician 2013; 88: 499506.Google Scholar
Jones, IG, Cameron, D. Social class analysis: an embarrassment to epidemiology. Community Med 1984; 6: 3746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakley, A, Rajan, L, Robertson, P. A comparison of different sources of information about pregnancy and childbirth. J Biosocial Sci 1990; 22: 477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, AA, Posthumus, AG, Bonsel, GJ, et al. Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 727–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golding, J, Tejeiro, A, Rojas Ochoa, F. The uses and abuses of national statistics. In Golding, J (ed.), Social and Biological Effects on Perinatal Mortality, vol. III. Perinatal Analyses: Report on an International Comparative Study Sponsored by the World Health Organization. Bristol: Bristol University, 1990, pp. 355–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS. The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. J Nutr 2003; 133(Suppl 2): 1592S1596S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke, OG, Anderson, HR, Bland, JM, et al. Effects on birth weight of smoking, alcohol, caffeine, socioeconomic factors and psychosocial stress. BMJ 1989; 289: 795801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, DA. Influence of birthweight on differences in infant mortality by social class and legitimacy. BMJ 1991; 303: 964–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmann-Boyce, J, Stead, LF, Cahill, K, Lancaster, T. Efficacy of interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2013 reviews. Addiction 2014; 109: 1414–25.Google Scholar
Almeida, J, Mulready-Ward, C, Bettegowda, VR, Ahluwalia, IB. Racial/ethnic and nativity differences in birth outcomes among mothers in New York City: the role of social ties and social support. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18: 90100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, RL, Johnson, KA, Owens, JR, et al. A national action plan for promoting preconception health and health care in the United States (2012–2014). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22: 797802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, SF, Johnson, K, Parker, C, et al. The national summit on preconception care: a summary of concepts and recommendations. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10 (5 Suppl): S197–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, J, Stein, Z, Susser, M. Preterm delivery: II. Risk factors; Fetal growth and birthweight: I. Indices, patterns and risk factors. In Kline, J, Stein, Z, Susser, M (eds), Conception to Birth: Epidemiology of Prenatal Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 191230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaswani, PR, Sabharwal, S. Trends in the occurrence of antenatal and perinatal complications with increasing parity. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013; 63: 260–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mgaya, AH, Massawe, SN, Kidanto, HL, Mgaya, HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 241.Google Scholar
Chan, A. Invited commentary: parity and the risk of Down’s syndrome: caution in interpretation. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 509–11.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Branch, DW, et al.; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1281–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, LM, Grey, TW, Stuebe, AM, et al. Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (3): CD003988.Google ScholarPubMed
Office for National Statistics. Vital statistics in the UK: births, deaths and marriages. 2018 update. (accessed March 2020).Google Scholar
Child Trends. Trends in teen birth. (accessed June 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, LE, Bracken, MB. Reproductive and chronologic age as a predictor of low birth weight, preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation in primiparous women. Ann Hum Biol 1990; 17: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Natality trends in the United States, 1909–2015. Birth rates by age group: United States 1940–2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (accessed June 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magill, MK, Wilcox, R. Adolescent pregnancy and associated risks: not just a result of maternal age. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75: 1310–11.Google Scholar
Editorial. Adolescent pregnancy. Lancet 1989; 2: 1308–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G, Finer, LB, Bankole, A, et al. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health 2015; 56: 223–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinzon, JL, Jones, VF. Care of adolescent parents and their children. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1743–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, SD, Anda, RF, Dube, SR, et al. The association between adverse childhood experiences and adolescent pregnancy, long-term psychosocial consequences, and fetal death. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 320–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukanich, AC, Rogers, KD, McDonald, NM. Physical maturity and outcome of pregnancy in primiparous women younger than 16 years of age. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 31–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell-DiCenso, A, Thomas, BH, Devlin, MC, et al. Evaluation of an educational program to prevent adolescent pregnancy. Health Educ Behav 1997; 24: 300–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingsworth, DR, Felice, M. Teenage pregnancy: a multiracial sociologic problem. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 741–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavin, C, Cox, JE. Teen pregnancy prevention: current perspectives. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24: 462–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J, Smailagic, N, Huband, N, Roloff, V, Bennett, C. Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (5): CD002020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, L, Sobotka, T, Bentzen, JG, Nyboe, Andersen A; ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 2943. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, S, Brock, DJH. Changes in maternal age distribution and their possible impact on the demand for prenatal diagnostic services. Br Med J 1988; 296: 978–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Balasch, J, Gratacós, E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 263–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, A-MN, Wohlfahrt, J, Christens, P, et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population-based register linkage study. BMJ 2000; 320: 17081712.Google ScholarPubMed
Baird, PA, Sadovnick, AD, Yee, IML. Maternal age and birth defects. Lancet 1991; 337: 527–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hook, EB. Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counselling for Down syndrome. Hum Genet 1987; 77: 303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Z, Stein, W, Susser, M. Attrition of trisomies as a maternal screening device: an explanation of the association of trisomy 21 with maternal age. Lancet 1986; 1: 944–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Morris, JK, Wald, NJ, Mutton, DE, Alberman, E: Comparison of models of maternal age-specific risk for Down syndrome live births. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 252–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gekas, J, Langlois, S, Ravitsky, V, et al. Identification of trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and Down syndrome from maternal plasma. Appl Clin Genet 2014; 7: 127–31.Google Scholar
Newnham, JP, Dickinson, JE, Hart, RJ, et al. Strategies to prevent preterm birth. Front Immunol 2014; 5: 584.Google ScholarPubMed
Ota, E, Tobe-Gai, R, Mori, R, Farrar, D. Antenatal dietary education and supplementation to increase energy and protein intake. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (6): CD000032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapira, N. Prenatal nutrition: a critical window of opportunity for mother and child. Womens Health 2008; 4: 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, DJ, Thornburg, KL. The obstetric origins of health for a lifetime. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 511–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieger, JA, Clifton, VL. A review of the impact of dietary intakes in human pregnancy on infant birthweight. Nutrients 2015; 7: 153–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumey, LH. Compensatory placental growth after restricted maternal nutrition in early pregnancy. Placenta 1998; 19: 105–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseboom, T, de Rooij, S, Painter, R. The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 485–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, DJ, Thornburg, KL. Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta 2013; 34: 841–5. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.063.Google Scholar
da Silva Lopes, K, Ota, E, Shakya, P, et al. Effects of nutrition interventions during pregnancy on low birth weight: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(3): e000389. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, JM. Folate and vitamin B12. Proc Nutr Soc 1999; 58: 441–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bracken, MB, Triche, EW, Belanger, K, et al. Association of maternal caffeine consumption with decrements in fetal growth. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 456–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanfar, S, Jaafar, SH. Effects of restricted caffeine intake by mother on fetal, neonatal and pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (6): CD006965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes (DRIs). (accessed June 2019).Google ScholarPubMed
McCauley, ME, van den Broek, N, Dou, L, Vitamin, Othman M. A supplementation during pregnancy for maternal and newborn outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10): CD008666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, HJ, Smulders, Y. Overview of homocysteine and folate metabolism. With special references to cardiovascular disease and neural tube defects. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011; 34: 7581. doi:10.1007/s10545-010-9177-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgetts, V, Morris, R, Francis, A, Gardosi, J, Ismail, K. Effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on reducing the risk of small-for-gestational age neonates: a population study, systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2014; 122: 478–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Rumbold, A, Ota, E, Nagata, C, Shahrook, S, Crowther, CA. Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD004072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumbold, A, Ota, E, Hori, H, Miyazaki, C, Crowther, CA. Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD004069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De-Regil, LM, Palacios, C, Lombardo, LK, Peña-Rosas, JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (1): CD008873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-López, JE, Carlos-Gil, AM, Rodríguez-López, R, et al. [Prophylactic vitamin K for vitamin K deficiency bleeding of the newborn.] Farm Hosp 2011; 35: 148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steegers-Theunissen, RPM. Maternal nutrition and obstetric outcome. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 9: 431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, M, Steegers-Theunissen, R, Kollée, L, et al. Supplementation of vitamin K in pregnant women receiving anticonvulsant therapy prevents neonatal vitamin K deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 884–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ota, E, Mori, R, Middleton, P, et al. Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (2): CD000230.Google Scholar
Zhou, SJ, Anderson, AJ, Gibson, RA, Makrides, M. Effect of iodine supplementation in pregnancy on child development and other clinical outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 98: 1241–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peña-Rosas, JP, De-Regil, LM, Garcia-Casal, MN, Dowswell, T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7): CD004736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, AG, Bougatsos, C, Dana, T, et al. Routine iron supplementation and screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 566–76. doi: 10.7326/M14-2932.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Lawrie, TA, Atallah, ÁN, Torloni, MR. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10: CD001059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva Lopes, K, Ota, E, Shakya, P, et al. Effects of nutrition interventions during pregnancy on low birth weight: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2(3): e000389. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, DE, Raskin, J, Garfinkel, PE, et al. Anorexia nervosa, bulimia, and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 1194–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet 311. Updated February 2018. (accessed March 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawes, MG, Grudzinskas, JG. Repeated measurement of maternal weight during pregnancy: is this a useful practice? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardwell, MS. Eating disorders during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68: 312–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, A, Heshmati, A, Malki, N, Koupil, I. Associations between birth characteristics and eating disorders across the life course: findings from 2 million males and females born in Sweden, 1975–1998. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179: 852–63. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Z, Mulla, S, Beyene, J, et al.; Knowledge Synthesis Group. Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40: 65101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsells, M, García-Patterson, A, Corcoy, R. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of prepregnancy underweight and miscarriage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 207: 7379. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.012.Google Scholar
Tennant, PW, Rankin, J, Bell, R. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal and infant death: a cohort study from the North of England. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1501–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogarty, S, Elmir, R, Hay, P, Schmied, V. The experience of women with an eating disorder in the perinatal period: a meta-ethnographic study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18: 121. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1762-9.Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, CC, Moawad, AH, Rosenow, PJ, River, P. Acid-base characteristics of fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation during labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 553–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Beydoun, MA, Wang, Y. Gender-ethnic disparity in BMI and waist circumference distribution shifts in US adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17: 169–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duvekot, JJ. Pregnancy and obesity: practical implications. Eur Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 1: 7488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD. The Heavy Burden of Obesity: the Economics of Prevention. OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD, 2019. ScholarPubMed
Stothard, KJ, Tennant, PW, Bell, R, Rankin, J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009; 301: 636–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Yao, R, Ananth, CV, Park, BY, et al.; Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 457.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuthalapaty, FS, Rouse, DJ, Owen, J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 452–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garbaciak, JA, Richter, M, Miller, S, Barton, JJ. Maternal weight and pregnancy complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 238–45.Google Scholar
Dindo, D, Muller, MK, Weber, M, Clavein, PA. Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 2003; 361: 20322035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, DR, Velmahos, GC. Difficulties in managing the surgical patient who is morbidly obese. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: S478–82. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ec54f6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katan, MB. Weight-loss diets for the prevention and treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 923–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flodgren, G, Gonçalves-Bradley, DC, Summerbell, CD. Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in children and adults with overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11: CD000984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astrup, A. Dietary approaches to reducing body weight. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 13: 109–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lind, T. Nutrition: the changing scene. Would more calories per day keep low birthweight at bay? Lancet 1984; i: 501–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, CA, Hecker, E. Maternal obesity and adverse reproductive outcomes: reducing the risk. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014; 69: 622–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, FM, Bray, GA, Carey, VJ, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 859–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Flum, DR, Khan, TV, Dellinger, EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA 2007; 298: 1442–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santry, HP, Gillen, DL, Lauderdale, DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005; 294: 1909–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colquitt, J, Pickett, K, Loveman, E, Frampton, GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (8): CD003641.Google ScholarPubMed
Falcone, V, Stopp, T, Feichtinger, M, et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: a narrative literature review and discussion of impact on pregnancy management and outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018 ;18(1): 507. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2124-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwong, W, Tomlinson, G, Feig, DS. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after bariatric surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis: do the benefits outweigh the risks? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 573–80. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.003.Google Scholar
Johansson, K, Cnattingius, S, Näslund, I, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 814–24. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1405789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, E, Coats, A, Owens, P, et al. Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British Hypertension Society. BMJ 2000; 320: 1128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendler, I, Blackwell, SC, Treadwell, MC, et al. Does advanced ultrasound equipment improve the adequacy of ultrasound visualization of fetal cardiac structures in the obese gravid woman? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1616–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladini, D, Vassallo, M, Tartaglione, A, et al. The role of tissue harmonic imaging in fetal echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 159–64.Google Scholar
Robinson, H, Tkatch, S, Mayes, DC, Bott, N, Okun, N. Is maternal obesity a predictor of shoulder dystocia? Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 24–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, A, Moar, V, Ounsted, M. The relative contribution of different maternal factors in large-for-gestational-age pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1982; 13: 269–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaill, F, Hofmeyr, GJ Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): 000933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, IA, Gross, TL. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2003; 16: 261–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, JM, Anderson, ER, Gates, S, Grivell, RM. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (7): CD004732.Google Scholar
Mathai, M, Hofmeyr, GJ, Mathai, NE. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (5): CD004453.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C, Enkin, MW. Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): 000085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naumann, RW, Hauth, JC, Owen, J, et al. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 412–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, PS, White, AM, Guinn, DA, et al. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 967–73.Google Scholar
Mackeen, AD, Berghella, V, Larsen, ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (9): CD003577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, J, Quinn, S, Dwyer, T, et al. Maternal diet, breastfeeding and adolescent body composition: a 16-year prospective study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; 66: 1329–34.Google Scholar
Davies, GA, Maxwell, C, McLeod, L, Gagnon, R, et al.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hytten, FE. Weight gain in pregnancy. In Hytten, FE, Chamberlain, G (eds), Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 173203.Google Scholar
Dawes, MG, Grudzinskas, JG. Patterns of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 195201.Google Scholar
Maternal weight gain in pregnancy [editorial]. Lancet 1991; 338: 415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Raaij, JMA, Vermaat-Miedema, SH, Schonk, CM, et al. Energy requirements of pregnancy in the Netherlands. Lancet 1987; ii: 953–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, RF, Abell, SK, Ranasinha, S, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2017; 317: 2207–25. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, M, McKillop, FM, Durnin, JVGA. Women who gain more fat during pregnancy may not have bigger babies: Implications for recommended weight gain during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 254–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, GW, Smiciklas-Wright, H, Scholl, TO, Karp, RJ. Post partum weight change: how much of the weight gained will be lost after delivery? Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 701–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, ID, Olson, CM, De Ver Dye, T. Discordance in the assessment of prepregnancy weight status of adolescents: a comparison between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sex- and age-specific body mass index classification and the Institute of Medicine-based classification used for maternal weight gain guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 9981002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, BF, Laros, RK. Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 15: 503–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, KM Yaktine, AL. Weight Gain during Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kapadia, MZ, Park, CK, Beyene, J, et al. Can we safely recommend gestational weight gain below the 2009 guidelines in obese women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2015; 16: 189206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogozińska, E, Marlin, N, Jackson, L, et al. Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2017; 21(41): 1158. doi:10.3310/hta21410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, KT, Bonzini, M, Bonde, JP; Multidisciplinary Guideline Development Group; Health and Work Development Unit; Royal College of Physicians; Faculty of Occupational Medicine. Pregnancy: occupational aspects of management: concise guidance. Clin Med 2013; 13: 75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijder, CA, Brand, T, Jaddoe, V, et al. Physically demanding work, fetal growth and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. The Generation R Study. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 543–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Both, MI, Overvest, MA, Wildhagen, MF, et al. The association of daily physical activity and birth outcome: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 421–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlüssel, MM, de Souza, EB, Reichenheim, ME, Kac, G. Physical activity during pregnancy and maternal-child health outcomes: a systematic literature review. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(Suppl 4): s531–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (6): e135–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3): CD000180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conger, J, Magann, EF. Diving and pregnancy: what do we really know? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014; 69: 551–6. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000105.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M, Stayner, L, Slama, R, et al. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2014; 64: 494500.Google Scholar
Westergaard, N, Gehring, U, Slama, R, Pedersen, M. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight: are some women more vulnerable than others? Environ Int 2017; 104: 146–54. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, ER, Lanting, CI. Consequences for long-term neurological and cognitive development of the child lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol 2000; 478: 271–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, KK, O’Neill, MS, Meeker, JD. Environmental contaminant exposures and preterm birth: a comprehensive review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2013; 16: 69113.Google ScholarPubMed
Parzefall, W. Risk assessment of dioxin contamination in human food. Food Chem Toxicol 2002; 40: 1185–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Garry, VF, Schreinemachers, D, Harkins, ME, Griffith, J. Pesticide appliers, biocides, and birth defects in rural Minnesota. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104: 394–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijder, CA, Brand, T, Jaddoe, V, et al. Physically demanding work, fetal growth and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. The Generation R Study. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 543–50. doi:10.1136/oemed-2011-100615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figà-Talamanca, I. Reproductive health and occupational hazards among women workers. In Kane, P (ed.), Women and Occupational Health: Issues and Policy Paper for the Global Commission of Women’s Health. Geneva: WHO Press, 1999, pp. 6065. (accessed June 2019).Google ScholarPubMed
Dennerstein, I. Paid work, gender and health. In Kane, P (ed): Women and Occupational Health: Issues and Policy Paper for the Global Commission of Women’s Health. Geneva: WHO Press, 1999, pp. 4549. (accessed June 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMartin, KI, Chu, M, Kopecky, E, et al. Pregnancy outcome following maternal organic solvent exposure: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34: 288–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijder, CA, te Velde, E, Roeleveld, N, Burdorf, A. Occupational exposure to chemical substances and time to pregnancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 284300. doi:10.1093/humupd/dms005.Google Scholar
Mozurkewich, EL, Luke, B, Avni, M, Wolf, FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 623–35.Google Scholar
Gabbe, SG, Turner, LP. Reproductive hazards of the American lifestyle: work during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 826–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamelle, N, Laumon, B, Lazar, P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 309–22.Google Scholar
Figà-Talamanca, I. Occupational risk factors and reproductive health of women. Occup Med (Lond) 2006; 56: 521–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, AD, McDonald, JC, Armstrong, B, et al. Work with visual display units in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med 1988; 45: 509–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindbohm, ML, Hietanen, M. Magnetic fields of video display terminals and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37: 952–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magann, EF, Chauhan, SP, Dahlke, JD, et al. Air travel and pregnancy outcomes: a review of pregnancy regulations and outcomes for passengers, flight attendants, and aviators. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010; 65: 396402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, KM, Ehrenthal, D, Evensen, A, Iruretagoyena, JI. Travel during pregnancy: considerations for the obstetric provider. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2017; 72: 97115. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000398.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO’s Ionizing Radiation Programme. Geneva: WHO. Scholar
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion 746. Air travel during pregnancy. Interim update 2018. (accessed June 2019).Google ScholarPubMed
Huch, R, Baumann, H, Fallenstein, F, et al. Physiologic changes in pregnant women and their fetuses during jet air travel. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 9961000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Air travel and pregnancy. Scientific Impact paper No. 1. May 2013. (accessed June 2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, D, Parisini, E, Mozaffarian, D. Meta-analysis: travel and risk for venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 180–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, BF, Münster, M, Smith, A, et al. The BEST study: a prospective study to compare business class versus economy class air travel as a cause of thrombosis. S Afr Med J 2003; 93: 522–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannegieter, SC, Rosendaal, FR. Pregnancy and travel-related thromboembolism. Thromb Res 2013; 131 (Suppl 1): S55–8.
Clarke, MJ, Broderick, C, Hopewell, S, Juszczak, E, Eisinga, A. Compression stockings for preventing deep vein thrombosis in airline passengers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (9): CD004002.
Hyde, LK, Cook, LJ, Olson, LM, et al. Effect of motor vehicle crashes on adverse fetal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 279–86.
World Health Organization. Vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccines. In International Travel and Health. Geneva: WHO, 2015. 2017 update. (accessed March 2020).
Thomas, RE. Preparing patients to travel abroad safely: Part 2. Updating vaccinations. Can Fam Physician 2000; 46: 646–52, 655–6.
Wangdi, K, Furuya-Kanamori, L, Clark, J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors 2018; 11(1): 210. doi:10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y.
Desai, M, Hill, J, Fernandes, S, et al. Prevention of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18(4): e119–32. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30064-1.
Radeva-Petrova, D, Kayentao, K, ter Kuile, FO, et al. Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women in endemic areas: any drug regimen versus placebo or no treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10): CD000169.
Casalino, E, Le Bras, J, Chaussin, F, et al. Predictive factors of malaria in travelers to areas where malaria is endemic. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1625–30.
Bacchus, LJ, Bewley, S, Vitolas, CT, et al. Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital Reprod Health Matters 2010; 18: 147–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bewley, S, Friend, J, Mezey, G (eds). Violence Against Women. London, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bewley, S, Welch, J (eds). ABC of Domestic and Sexual Violence. London: Wiley, 2014.Google Scholar
Breiding, MJ, Smith, SG, Basile, KC, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization: national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ 2014; 63 (Suppl 8): 118. ScholarPubMed
British Medical Association. Domestic Violence: A Health Care Issue? London: BMA, 1998.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Responding to Domestic Abuse: A Handbook for Health Professionals. London: DOH, 2006Google Scholar
Feder, G, Ramsay, J, Dunne, D, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. London: UK Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2009. ScholarPubMed
Jahanfar, S, Janssen, PA, Howard, LM, Dowswell, T. Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (2): CD009414.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Domestic Violence and Abuse: Multiagency Working. Public Health Guideline 50. London: NICE, 2014. Scholar
Royal College of Midwives. Domestic Abuse: Pregnancy, Birth and the Puerperium. Guidance Paper No. 5. London: RCM, 2006.Google Scholar
Sheridan, DJ. Forensic documentation of battered pregnant women. J Nurse Midwifery 1996; 41: 467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women: Summary Report of Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women’s Responses. Geneva: WHO, 2005. Scholar
World Health Organization. Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women. WHO Clinical and Policy Guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 2013. January 2018).Google Scholar
Home Office. Domestic Violence: A National Report. London: Home Office, 2005, p 7.Google Scholar
Fishwick, NJ. 1998 Assessment of women for partner abuse. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 27: 661–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kershaw, C, Budd, T, Kinshott, G, et al. The 2000 British Crime Survey. England and Wales. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 18/00. London: Home Office, 2000, p. 36.Google Scholar
Mirlees-Black, C. Domestic Violence: Findings from a New British Crime Survey Self-Completion Questionnaire. Research Study 191. London: Home Office, 1999, p. 22.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Domestic Abuse: Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales: Year Ending March 2018. (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Johnson, H, Sacco, VF. Researching violence against women: statistics Canada’s national survey. Can J Criminol 1995; 37: 281304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, J, Christoffel, K, Bateman, L, et al. Assessing for abuse: self-report versus nurse interview. Public Health Nurs 1991; 8: 245–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, F, Smith, M, Long, J, O’Dowd, T. Reported frequency of domestic violence: cross sectional survey of women attending general practice. BMJ 2002; 324: 271–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, J, Coid, J, Petruckevitch, A, et al. Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care. BMJ 2002; 324: 274–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, JC, Oliver, C, Bullock, L. Why battering during pregnancy? Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs 1993; 4: 343–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Helton, A, McFarlane, J, Anderson, ET. Battered and pregnant: a prevalence study. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 1337–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacchus, L, Mezey, G, Bewley, S. Domestic violence: prevalence in pregnant women and associations with physical and psychological health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113: 611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, FSJ, Coutinho, EC, Duarte, JC et al.. Domestic violence in pregnancy: prevalence and characteristics of the pregnant woman. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26: 2417–25. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedin-Widding, L. Postpartum, also a risk period for domestic violence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 89: 41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, MA, Perrin, N, Wall, E. Effects of abuse on maternal complications and birth weight in adult and adolescent women. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 530–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Gazmararian, JA, Lazorick, A, Spitz, AM, et al. Prevalence of violence against pregnant women. JAMA 1996; 275: 1915–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, G, Clutton-Brock, T, Cooper, G, et al. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer – 2003 to 2005. The Seventh Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London, CEMACH, 2007, pp. 173–9.Google Scholar
Lancaster, CA, Gold, KJ, Flynn, HA, et al. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnbogadóttir, H, Dykes, AK, Wann-Hansson, C. Prevalence and incidence of domestic violence during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a longitudinal cohort study in the south of Sweden. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 228. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1017-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Domestic Violence. Council Report CR102. London: RCP, 2002, p. 11.Google Scholar
Mullen, RE, Romans-Clarkson, SE, Walton, VA, Herbison, GP: Impact of sexual and physical abuse on women’s mental health. Lancet 1988; 1: 841–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, BS. Eaton, LA. Petersen-Williams, P. Intersecting epidemics among pregnant women: alcohol use, interpersonal violence, and HIV infection in South Africa.Current HIV/AIDS Reports 2013; 10: 103–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilsnack, SC. Wilsnack, RW. Kantor, LW. Focus on: women and the costs of alcohol use. Alcohol Res 2013 35: 219–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Katerndahl, D, Burge, S, Ferrer, R, Becho, J, Wood, R. Differences in social network structure and support among women in violent relationships. J Interpers Violence 2013; 28: 1948–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, M, Gorenflo, D, Black, E, et al. Rapid repeat pregnancy and experiences of interpersonal violence among low-income adolescents. Am J Prev Med 1999; 16: 318–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallitto, CC, Campbell, JC, O’Campo, P. Is intimate partner violence associated with unintended pregnancy? A review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005; 6: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, LE, Allen, RH, Goyal, V, Raker, C, Gottlieb, AS. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 42.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterno, MT, Jordan, ET. A review of factors associated with unprotected sex among adult women in the United States. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012; 41: 258–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cokkinides, VE, Coker, AL, Experiencing physical violence during pregnancy: prevalence and correlates. Fam Community Health 1998; 20: 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillard, PJ: Physical abuse in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 185–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Crane, CA. Hawes, SW. Weinberger, AH. Intimate partner violence victimization and cigarette smoking: a meta-analytic review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2013; 14: 305–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shneyderman, Y, Kiely, M. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: victim or perpetrator? Does it make a difference? BJOG 2013; 120: 1375–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriksen, L, Vangen, S, Schei, B, Lukasse, M. Sexual violence and antenatal hospitalization. Birth 2013; 40: 281–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kernic, MA, Wolf, ME, Holt, VL. Rates and relative risk of hospital admission among women in violent intimate partner relationships. Am J Public Health 2000; 9: 1416–20.Google Scholar
Kothari, RU, Kothari, C, DeBoer, M, Koestner, A, Rohs, T. Inpatient hospitalization and intimate partner violence: who are we treating? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77: 129–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taggart, L, Mattson, S. Delay in prenatal care as a result of battering in pregnancy: cross-cultural implications. Health Care Women Int 1995; 17: 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, B, Gaboury, MT, Onken, KJ. Undocumented and unprotected immigrant women and children in harm’s way. Journal Forensic Nurs 2008; 4: 123–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cha, S, Masho, SW. Intimate partner violence and utilization of prenatal care in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2014; 29: 911–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Midwives. Domestic Abuse: Pregnancy, Birth and the Puerperium. Guidance Paper No. 5. London: RCM, 2006.Google Scholar
American Medical Association. Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. Arch Fam Med 1992; 1: 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, M. Domestic violence: clues to victimisation. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 764–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisso, JA, Schwarz, DF, Hirschinger, N, et al. Violent injuries among women in an urban area. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1899–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M, Chappell, LC, Parnell, BL, Seed, PT, Bewley, S. Associations between intimate partner violence and termination of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 2014; 11(1): e1001581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dartnall, E, Jewkes, R. Sexual violence against women: the scope of the problem. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013 27: 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, DK, Parker, B. Domestic violence and pregnancy. Health effects and implications for nursing practice. In Campbell, JC, Humphreys, J (eds), Nursing Care of Survivors of Family Violence. London: Mosby, 1987.Google Scholar
Samandari, G, Martin, SL, Schiro, S. Homicide among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States: a review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2010 11: 4254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, SL. Macy, RJ. Sullivan, K. Magee, ML. Pregnancy-associated violent deaths: the role of intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8: 135–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walling, MK, Reiter, RC, O’Hara, MW, et al. Abuse history and chronic pain in women: I. Prevalences of sexual abuse and physical abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 193–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Ratner, PA. Indicators of exposure to wife-abuse. Can J Nurs Res 1995; 27: 3146.Google ScholarPubMed
Eby, K, Campbell, J, Sullivan, C, Davidson, WS. Health effects of experiences of sexual violence for women with abusive partners. Health Care Women Int 1995; 16: 563–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drossman, DA, Talley, NJ, Leserman, J, et al. Sexual and physical abuse and gastrointestinal illness: review and recommendations. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 782–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schei, B, Bakketeig, LS. Gynaecological impact of sexual and physical abuse by spouse. A study of a random sample of Norwegian women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 94: 1379–83.Google Scholar
Winter, A, Stephenson, R. Intimate partner violence and symptoms of reproductive tract infections among married Indian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 121: 218–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002; 359: 1331–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, A, Stewart, DE. Maternal and fetal outcomes of intimate partner violence associated with pregnancy in the Latin American and Caribbean region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 124: 611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayak, MB, Al-Yattama, M. Assault victim history as a factor in depression during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 204–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmied, V, Johnson, M, Naidoo, N, et al. Maternal mental health in Australia and New Zealand: a review of longitudinal studies. Women Birth 2013; 26: 167–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shadigian, E, Bauer, ST. Pregnancy-associated death: a qualitative systematic review of homicide and suicide. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60: 183–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, DE. Incidence of postpartum abuse in women with a history of abuse during pregnancy. CMAJ 1994; 151: 1601–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, CC, Schei, B, Myhr, TL, et al. Abuse: a risk factor for low birth weight? A systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2001; 164: 1567–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Shah, PS, Shah, J. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19: 2017–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, BM, Spracklen, CN, Schweizer, ML, Ryckman, KK, Saftlas, AF. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk for adverse infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123: 1289–99. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13928.Google ScholarPubMed
Hill, A, Pallitto, C, McCleary-Sills, J, Garcia-Moreno, C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 133: 269–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, J, O’Campo, P, Gielen, A, et al. Preterm labour, placental abruption and premature rupture of membranes in relation to maternal violence or verbal abuse. J Matern Fetal Med 1999; 8: 7680.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. The battered fetus. Br J Midwifery 1996; 4: 496–8.Google Scholar
Bewley, S, Friend, J, Mezey, G (eds). Violence Against Women. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1997.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Responding to Domestic Abuse. A Handbook for Health Professionals. London: DOH, 2006.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Domestic Violence. ACOG Technical Bulletin 209. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Domestic Violence and Abuse: Multiagency Working. Public Health Guideline 50. London: NICE, 2014. ScholarPubMed
Jahanfar, S, Janssen, PA, Howard, LM, Dowswell, T. Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 (2): CD009414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, A, Nosbusch, JM, Rice, J. Safe mom, safe baby: a collaborative model of care for pregnant women experiencing intimate partner violence. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2012; 26: 307–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharps, PW, Campbell, J, Baty, ML, Walker, KS, Bair-Merritt, MH. Current evidence on perinatal home visiting and intimate partner violence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008; 37: 480–90.Google Scholar
Nelson, HD, Bougatsos, C, Blazina, I. Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012; 156: 796808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Medical Association. Domestic Violence: A Health Care Issue? London: BMA, 1998, pp. 51–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, LB, Peipert, JF, Zierler, S, et al. Battering in pregnancy: An assessment of two screening methods. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, R, Beale, B, Gillies, D. Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2010; 11: 190201.Google ScholarPubMed
Bacchus, L, Mezey, G, Bewley, S. Women’s perceptions and experiences of routine screening for domestic violence in a maternity service. BJOG 2002; 109: 916.Google ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, MA, Szkupinski, S, Bauer, HM: Breaking the silence. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 153–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covington, DL, Diehl, SJ, Wright, BD, Piner, M. Assessing for violence during pregnancy using a systematic approach. Matern Child Health J 1997; 1: 129–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, CM, Bybee, DI. Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67: 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, DI, Sullivan, CM. Predicting re-victimisation of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. Am J Community Psychol 2005; 36: 8596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, J, Soeken, K, Reel, S, et al. Resource use by abused women following an intervention programme: associated severity of abuse and reports of ending abuse. Public Health Nurs 1997; 14: 244–50.Google Scholar
McFarlane, J, Soeken, K, Wiist, W. An evaluation of interventions to decrease intimate partner violence to pregnant women. Public Health Nurs 2000; 17: 443–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, J, Soeken, K, Wiist, W. An evaluation of interventions to decrease intimate partner violence to pregnant women. Public Health Nurs 2000; 55: 5261.Google Scholar
Feder, G, Ramsay, J, Dunne, D, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. London: UK Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2009. ScholarPubMed
Ramsay, J, Rivas, C, Feder, G. Interventions to reduce violence and promote the physical and psychological well-being of women who experience partner violence: a systematic review of controlled evaluations. London: Department of Health, 2005, p. 43.Google Scholar
Sheridan, DJ. Forensic documentation of battered pregnant women. J Nurse Midwifery 1996; 41: 467–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, D, Baird, K, Price, S, et al. An Evaluation of the Bristol Pregnancy and Domestic Violence Programme to Promote the Introduction of Routine Antenatal Enquiry for Domestic Violence at North Bristol NHS Trust. Bristol: University of West England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacchus, LJ, Bewley, S, Vitolas, CT, et al. Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital. Reprod Health Matters 2010; 18: 147–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwell, TS, Casten, RJ, Armstrong, KA, et al. Results of a domestic violence training program offered to staff of urban community health centers. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15: 235–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, SV, Mason, E, Howson, CP, et al. Born too soon: care before and between pregnancy to prevent preterm births: from evidence to action. Reprod Health 2013; 10 (Suppl 1): S3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiist, WH, McFarlane, J. The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, LJ, Allan, R, Grunfield, A. Improving the emergency department detection rate of domestic violence using direct questioning. J Emerg Med 2000; 19: 117–24.
Sharps, PW, Bullock, LF, Campbell, JC, et al. Domestic Violence Enhanced Perinatal Home Visits: the DOVE randomized clinical trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2016; 25: 1129–38.
World Health Organization. Classification of female genital mutilation. Geneva: WHO, 2007. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. Factsheet # 241. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
UNICEF. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Statistical Overview and Exploration of the Dynamics of Change. UNICEF, 2013. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A, Dorkenoo, E. Female Genital Mutilation in England & Wales. Updated statistical estimates of the numbers of affected women living in England and Wales and girls at risk 2014. London: Equality Now and City University London, 2015. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Equality Now. FGM in the United States. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
UK Government. Serious Crime Act. 2015 c.9 Part 5. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Essén, B, Hanson, BS, Östergren, PO, Lindquist, PG, Gudmundsson, S. Increased perinatal mortality among sub-Saharan immigrants in a city-population in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 737–43. doi: 10.3109/00016340009169187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, R, Gagnon, A, Gissler, M, et al. Somali women and their pregnancy outcomes postmigration: data from six receiving countries. BJOG 2008; 115: 1630–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malin, M, Gissler, M. Maternal care and birth outcomes among ethnic minority women in Finland. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanconato, G, Iacovella, C, Parazzini, F, Bergamini, V, Franchi, M. Pregnancy outcome of migrant women delivering in a public institution in northern Italy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011; 72: 157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iavazzo, C, Sardi, TA, Gkegkes, ID. Female genital mutilation and infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 1137–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnarr, J, Smaill, F. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Eur J Clin Invest 2008; 38 (Suppl. 2): 50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkash, E, Wientraub, AY, Sergienko, R, et al. Acute antepartum pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a critical analysis of risk factors and outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162: 24–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazor-Dray, E, Levy, A, Schlaeffer, F, Sheiner, E. Maternal urinary tract infection: is it independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcome? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22: 124–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matuszkiewicz-Rowińska, J, Małyszko, J, Wieliczko, M. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy: old and new unresolved diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Arch Med Sci 2015; 11: 6777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banks, E, Meirik, O, Farley, T, et al.; WHO study group on female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 2006; 367: 1835–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Berg, RC, Odgaard-Jensen, J, Fretheim, A, Underland, V, Vist, G. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/ cutting. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014; 2014: 542859. doi: 10.1155/2014/542859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berggren, V, Gottvall, K, Isman, E, Bergström, S, Ekéus, C. Infibulated women have an increased risk of anal sphincter tears at delivery: a population-based Swedish register study of 250 000 births. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 101–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health. Female Genital Mutilation Risk and Safeguarding: Guidance for Professionals. London: DoH, 2016. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Health and Social Care Information Centre. The Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Enhanced Dataset (SCCI 2026). (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Female Genital Mutilation and its Management. Green-top Guideline No. 53. London: RCOG, 2015. Appendix 3. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
FGM National Clinical Group. De-infibulation video resource. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Cassidy, SB, Allanson, JE (eds). Management of Genetic Syndromes, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheveeva, P, Agathokleous, M,Nicolaides, K. Fetal aneuploidies. In Coady, A, Bower, S (eds), Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Abnormalities, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone, 2014, pp. 3159.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. Harper’s Practical Genetic Counselling, 8th edn. London: Hodder Arnold, 2014.Google Scholar
Farndon, P. Fetal anomalies: the geneticist’s approach. In Coady, A, Bower, S (eds), Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Abnormalities, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone, 2014, pp. 139–60.Google Scholar
Firth, HV, Hurst, JA. Oxford Desk Reference: Clinical Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gardner, RJM, Sutherland, GR, Shaffer, LG. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling, 4th edn. Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, KL, Jones, MC, del Campo, M. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation, 7th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2013.Google Scholar
Reardon, W. The Bedside Dysmorphologist: Classical Clinical Signs in Human Malformation Syndromes and their Diagnostic Significance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimoin, DL, Connor, JM, Pyeritz, RE, Korf, BR. Emery and Rimoin’s Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics, e-dition: Continually Updated Online Reference. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2006.Google Scholar
Strachan, T, Read, AP. Human Molecular Genetics, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Garland Science, 2010.Google Scholar
Young, ID. Introduction to Risk Calculation in Genetic Counselling, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
NHS Genomics Education Programme. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
NORD: National Organization for Rare Disorders. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Orphanet: the Portal for Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
UK Genetic Testing Network. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
ARC: Antenatal Results and Choices. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Contact a family. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Genetic Alliance UK. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Unique: the Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
NHS Genomics Education Programme. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
NORD: National Organization for Rare Disorders. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Orphanet: the Portal for Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
UK Genetic Testing Network. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
ARC: Antenatal Results and Choices. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Contact a family. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Genetic Alliance UK. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Unique: the Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Clarke, A. Harper’s Practical Genetic Counselling, 8th edn. London: Hodder Arnold, 2014.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. Rare is common. In 2009 Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. London: Department of Health, 2010, pp. 3545.Google Scholar
Sibert, JR, Harper, PS, Thompson, RJ, Newcombe, RG. Carrier detection in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Evidence from a study of obligatory carriers and mothers of isolated cases. Arch Dis Child 1979; 54: 534–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Genetic Testing Network. (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
NHS England. 2018/2019 final draft National Genomic Test Directory FAQ. (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
LORD v3.0: Leiden Open Variation Database 3.0. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Godard, B, Ten Kate, L, Evers-Kiebooms, G, Ayme, S. Population genetic screening programmes: Principles, techniques, practices, and policies. Eur J Hum Gen 2003; 11: S49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, F. Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening: a model for prevention of genetic disease. Genet Test 1998; 2: 271–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, JJ, Capua, A, Clow, C, Scriver, CR. Twenty-year outcome analysis of genetic screening programs for Tay–Sachs and beta-thalassemia disease carriers in high schools. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59: 793–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse, SD, Rogowski, WH, Ross, LF, et al. Population screening for genetic disorders in the 21st century: evidence, economics, and ethics. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 106–15.Google Scholar
NHS newborn blood spot (NBS) screening programme. (accessed March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranieri, E, Lewis, BD, Gerace, RL, et al. Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis using immunoreactive trypsinogen indirect gene analysis: Four years’ experience. BMJ 1994; 308: 1469–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Super, M, Schwarz, MJ, Malone, G, et al. Active cascade testing for carriers of cystic fibrosis gene. BMJ 1994; 308: 1462–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Loader, S, Caldwell, P, Kozyra, A, et al. Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59: 234–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, NE, Scotcher, D, Harris, H, et al. The uptake and acceptability to patients of cystic fibrosis carrier testing offered in pregnancy by the GP. J Med Genet 1997; 34: 459–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raeburn, JA. Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis. BMJ 1994; 308: 1451–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennie, ME, Gilfillan, A, Compton, M, et al. Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1992; 340: 214–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, J, Axton, RA, Gilfillan, A, et al. Antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: A trial of the couple method. BMJ 1994; 308: 1459–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, RS. Moving up the slippery slope: mandated genetic screening on Cyprus. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2009; 151C: 95103.Google Scholar
British Society for Human Genetics. Report on the Genetic Testing of Children. Birmingham: BSHG, 2010. (accessed March 2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vears, DF, Delany, C, Massie, J, Gillam, L. Why do parents want to know their child–s carrier status? A qualitative study. J Genet Couns 2016; 25: 1257–66.Google Scholar
Miller, DT, Adam, MP, Aradhya, S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 86: 749–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DECIPHER. Mapping the clinical genome: DECIPHER 9.10. (accessed March 2017).Google ScholarPubMed
Hillman, SC, McMullan, DJ, Hall, G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 610–20.Google Scholar
Wapner, RJ, Martin, CL, Levy, B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2175–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1374–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, BA, Soucier, D, Hanson, K, et al. Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genet Med 2013; 15: 139–45.Google Scholar
Hillman, SC, Skelton, J, Quinlan-Jones, E, Wilson, A, Kilby, MD. “If it helps…”: the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections. Am J Med Genet 2013; 161: 1619–28.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. Recommendations for the use of chromosome microarray in pregnancy. London: Royal College of Pathologists, 2015. (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Fraser, J, Mitchell, A. Kalmuk idiocy: report of a case with autopsy. J Mental Sci 1876; 98: 169–79.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, GE. Mongoloid imbecility. BMJ 1909; 2: 661–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleyer, A. Indication that mongoloid imbecility is a gametogenic mutation of disintegrating type. Am J Dis Child 1934; 47: 342.Google Scholar
Antonarakis, SE, Lewis, JG, Adelsberger, PA, et al. Parental origin of the extra chromosome in trisomy 21 as indicated by analysis of DNA polymorphisms. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 872–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, EB, Chambers, GM. Estimates of rates of Down’s syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20–49 in a New York State study. In Bergsma, D, Lowry, RB, Trimble, BK, Feingold, M (eds), Numerical Taxonomy of Birth Defects and Polygenic Disorders: Birth Defects. New York, NY: Allan R Liss, 1977.Google Scholar
Hook, EB, Fabia, JJ. Frequency of Down’s syndrome in live births by single year maternal age interval: results of the Massachusetts study. Teratology 1978; 17: 223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hook, EB, Lindsjo, A. Down’s syndrome in live births by single year maternal age intervals in a Swedish study: comparison with the results of the New York State study. Am J Hum Genet 1978; 30: 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, BK, Baird, PA. Maternal age and Down’s syndrome: age specific incidence rates by single year intervals. Am J Genet 1978; 2: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, GR, Clisby, SR, Bloor, G. Down’s syndrome in South Australia. Med J Aust 1979; 2: 5861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koulisher, L, Gillerot, Y. Down’s syndrome in Wallonia (south Belgium), 1971 to 1978: cytogenetic in incidence. Hum Genet 1980; 54: 243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D, Williams, EM, Newcombe, RG. Down’s syndrome and maternal age in South Glamorgan. J Med Genet 1980; 17: 433–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huether, CA, Gummere, GR, Hook, EB. Down’s syndrome: percentage reporting of birth certificates and single year maternal age risks for Ohio 1970–1979. Comparisons with up-state New York data. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 1367–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuckle, HS, Ward, NJ, Thompson, SG. Estimating a woman’s risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down’s syndrome using her age and serum alphafetoprotein level. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 387402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson-Smith, MA. Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders. Br Med Bull 1983; 39: 355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson-Smith, MA, Yates, JRW. Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: Report of a collaborative European study on 52,965 amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4: 544.Google Scholar
Hook, EB, Cross, PK, Regal, RR. The frequency of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at the upper most extremities of maternal age: Results on 56,094 fetuses studied prenatally and comparisons with data on live births. Hum Genet 1984; 68: 211–20.Google Scholar
Snijders, RJM, Sebre, N, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal age and gestational age-specific risk for chromosome defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 1995; 10: 215–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The UK NSC policy on Down’s syndrome screening in pregnancy, January 2016. (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Langlois, S, Duncan, A. Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011; 33: 955–60.Google Scholar
Cheveeva, P, Agathokleous, M,Nicolaides, K. Fetal aneuploidies. In Coady, A, Bower, S (eds), Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Abnormalities, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone, 2014, pp. 3159.Google Scholar
OMIM. Recurent hydatidiform mole; HYDM1. (accessed March 2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rani, AS, Jyothi, A, Reddy, PP, Reddy, OS. Reproduction in Down’s syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990; 31: 81–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Boue, A, Gallano, P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenatal Diagnosis 1984; 4: 4567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburton, D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 9951013.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM, Jiang, C, Bartolomei, MS. Epigenetics and imprinting in human disease. Int J Dev Biol 2014; 58: 291–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med 2015; 17: 68–9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dan, S, Chen, F, Choy, KW, et al. Prenatal detection of aneuploidy and imbalanced chromosomal arrangements by massively parallel sequencing. PLoS One 2012; 7: e27835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenson, PD, Ball, EV, Howells, K, et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database: providing a comprehensive central mutation database for molecular diagnostics and personalized genomics. Hum Genomics 2009; 4: 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ligt, J, Willemsen, MH, van Bon, BW, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1921–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Muzny, DM, Reid, JG, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1502–11.Google Scholar
Wright, CF, Fitzgerald, TW, Jones, WD, et al. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 2015; 385: 1305–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, CF, McRae, JF, Clayton, S, et al. Making new genetic diagnoses with old data: iterative reanalysis and reporting from genome-wide data in 1,133 families with developmental disorders. Genet Med 2018; 20: 1216–23. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genomics England. The 100,000 Genomes Project. (accessed January 2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, RC, Berg, JS, Grody, WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 15: 565–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, R, Parker, M. Opening Pandora’s box? Ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38: 20–5. doi: 10.1002/pd.5114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talkowski, ME, Ordulu, Z, Pillalamarri, V, et al. Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2226–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Filges, I, Nosova, E, Bruder, E, et al. Exome sequencing identifies mutations in KIF14 as a novel cause of an autosomal recessive lethal fetal ciliopathy phenotype. Clin Genet 2014; 86: 220–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, S, Wou, K, Vora, N, et al. Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2018: 38; 1019. doi: 10.1002/pd.5102.Google Scholar
Lord, J, McMullan, DJ, Eberhardt, RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393: 747–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31940-8.Google Scholar
Petrovski, S, Aggarwal, V, Giordano, JL et al. Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393: 758–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32042-7.Google Scholar
Yates, CL, Monaghan, KG, Copenheaver, D, et al. Whole-exome sequencing on deceased fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: expanding our knowledge of genetic disease during fetal development. Genet Med 2017; 19: 1171–8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.31.
Quinlan-Jones, E, Lord, J, Williams, D, et al. Molecular autopsy by trio exome sequencing and full post-mortem examination in fetuses and neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies. Genet Med 2019; 21: 1065–73. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0298-8.
Chandler, N, Best, S, Hayward, J, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using targeted exome sequencing: a cohort study to assess feasibility and potential impact on prenatal counselling and pregnancy management. Genet Med 2018; 20: 1430–7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.30.
International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis; Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine; Perinatal Quality Foundation. Joint position statement … on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38: 69. doi: 10.1002/pd.5195.
Norton, ME, Brar, H, Weiss, J, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 137.e1–8.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 545: non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1532–4.
UK National Screening Committee. The UK NSC recommendation on fetal anomaly screening in pregnancy. (accessed January 2018).
The NHS RAPID Project: Reliable Accurate Prenatal Diagnosis. (accessed March 2017).
Jenkins, LA, Deans, ZC, Lewis, C, Allen, S. Delivering an accredited non-invasive prenatal diagnosis service for monogenic disorders and best practice. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38: 4451. doi: 10.1002/pd.5197.