Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T20:45:26.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The Philippines: the weakest link in the fight against terrorism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

H. Harry L. Roque Jr.
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor University of the Philippines College of Law
Victor V. Ramraj
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Michael Hor
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Kent Roach
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Terrorism has become a franchise. Its manufacturers had astutely recognized early on that the southern part of the Philippines is an ideal market. The Philippines is not a very large country but it has played a significant role in the spread of terrorism even beyond the boundaries of Asia. The country's location, history and geopolitics offered an ideal breeding ground for terrorism to spread. The same factors that made it attractive to terrorists, however, offer significant potentials that could be tapped by the Philippine authorities to make the country play an equally significant role in the fight against terrorism. To make this happen, it is important that the government of the Philippines acknowledges the true extent of the problem within its boundaries, proclaims a commensurate policy and exhibits true political will.

While the rest of the countries in the region are busy apprehending and trying suspected terrorists, the Philippines achieved unprecedented embarrassment when one of the region's most wanted terrorists, Indonesian Fathur Roman Al Ghozi, escaped from the national headquarters of the Philippine National Police. Al Ghozi was suspected of masterminding the 30 December 2001 bombing of a commuter train that resulted in the death of more than fifty individuals.

Al Ghozi was subsequently killed following a massive manhunt but his escape highlighted the Philippines' weakness when it comes to dealing with terrorism: there is an official policy but it is lacking when it comes to implementation and sustainability.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×