Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T17:25:16.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Teaching and Genetic/Genomic Variation: An Educator’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

Susan Bouregy
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elena L. Grigorenko
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephen R. Latham
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Mei Tan
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Houston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement (Vol. 24). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Benyamin, B., Pourcain, B., Davis, O. S., Davies, G., Hansell, N. K., Brion, M. J., et al. (2014). Childhood intelligence is heritable, highly polygenic and associated with FNBP1L. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(2), 253258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, J. D., Saint Onge, J. M., Haberstick, B. C., Timberlake, D. S., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Do schools moderate the genetic determinants of smoking? Behavior Genetics, 38(3), 234246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, B., Khlentzos, D., Olson, R. K., & Samuelsson, S. (2010). Evolutionary and genetic perspectives on educational attainment. In Littleton, K., Wood, C., & Staarman, J. K. (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education, (pp. 334). Bingly, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Center for Genomics and Public Health. (n.d.) Genomics versus genetics: What’s the difference? Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/cgph/GenomicsGenetics.htm.Google Scholar
Champagne, F. A., & Mashoodh, R. (2009). Genes in context gene–environment interplay and the origins of individual differences in behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 127131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, E. (2008). Politics, genetics, and “greedy reductionism.” Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 337343.Google Scholar
Charney, E. (2012). Behavior genetics and postgenomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 331358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Seese, N., Owen, M. J., Daniels, J., McGuffin, P., et al. (1998). A quantitative trait locus associated with cognitive ability in children. Psychological Science, 9(3), 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S. W. (2009). Social regulation of human gene expression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 132137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, F. S., & Mansoura, M. K. (2001). The Human Genome Project. Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer, 91(1 Suppl.), 221225.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422(6934), 835847.Google Scholar
Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences in learners. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 605629). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Text materials in modern education: A comprehensive theory and platform for research. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schmidt, J. (1997). Stress and resilience in adolescence: An evolutionary perspective. In Borman, K. & Schneider, B. (Eds.), The adolescent years: Social influences and educational challenges, Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 99(5), 117.Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 254269.Google Scholar
Dick, D. M., Li, T. K., Edenberg, H. J., Hesselbrock, V., Kramer, J., Kuperman, S., et al. (2004). A genome-wide screen for genes influencing conduct disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 9(1), 8186.Google Scholar
Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufell, J. C. (2016). Global greatness: How social-emotional learning helps children success in school, in the workplace, and in life. Committee for Children. Retrieved from www.cfchildren.orgGoogle Scholar
Eapen, V. (2011). Genetic basis of autism: Is there a way forward? Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 24(3), 226236.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The neurobiological bases of reading and reading disability. In Elliott, J. G. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.) The dyslexia debate (pp. 88122). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2009). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161171.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54(1), 520.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, L., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2009). A programwide model for supporting social emotional development and addressing challenging behavior in early childhood settings. In Sailor, W., Dunlap, G., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 177202). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1876). The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 5, 391406.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Dozier, M. (2013). Introduction to the special section on genomics. Child Development, 84(1), 616.Google Scholar
Hodapp, R. M., & Fidler, D. J. (1999). Special education and genetics connections for the 21st century. Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 130137.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. (2006). Epigenetics: A historical overview. Epigenetics, 1(2), 7680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Knafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Prosocial behavior from early to middle childhood: Genetic and environmental influences on stability and change. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 771.Google Scholar
Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J. B., et al. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 1527315278.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C. (2016). Human cognitive abilities: Their organization, development, and use. In Corno, L. & Anderman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. Technology, education–connections (TEC) series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Mandinach, E. B., Parton, B. M., Gummer, E. S., & Anderson, R. (2015). Ethical and appropriate data use requires data literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(5), 2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, S., & Bleile, K. (2003). Neurological and developmental foundations of speech acquisition. Chicago, IL: American Speech Language Hearing Association Convent.Google Scholar
McMahon, S. D., & Washburn, J. J. (2003). Violence prevention: An evaluation of program effects with urban African American students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(1), 4362.Google Scholar
Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development, 81(1), 4179.Google Scholar
Moalem, S. (2014). Inheritance: How our genes change our lives -- and our lives change our genes. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
Molfese, D., Key, A. F., Maguire, M., Dove, G., & Molfese, V. (2005). Event-related evoked potentials (ERPs) in speech perception. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (Eds.),The handbook of speech perception (pp. 99121). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2013). Intelligence and IQ. In Wheldall, K. (Ed.), Developments in educational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. (1998). Using DNA in health psychology. Health Psychology, 17(1), 5355.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. (2011). Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 582592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R. (2013). Child development and molecular genetics: 13 years later. Child Development, 84, 104120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & Asbury, K. (2005). Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 8698.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (2011). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? International Journal of Epidemiology, 40 (3), 563582.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Asbury, K., & Dunn, J. (2001). Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(3), 225233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, N. R., Eicher, J. D., Butter, F., Kong, Y., Miller, L. L., Ring, S. M., et al. (2013). Alleles of a polymorphic ETV6 binding site in DCDC2 confer risk of reading and language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93(1), 1928.Google Scholar
Quintilian Institutes of Oratory (trans. H. E. Butler) (1920). London: William Heinermann.Google Scholar
Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2005). Teaching and learner variation. Pedagogy: Teaching for learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology: Monograph Series II, 3, 4769.Google Scholar
Randi, J. (Ed.). (2007). Research in the service of practice. Theory into Practice, 46 (4).Google Scholar
Randi, J. (2017). Teaching and learning hand in hand: Adaptive teaching and self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 119(13). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord on April 21, 2017.Google Scholar
Reilly, C. (2012). Behavioural phenotypes and special educational needs: Is aetiology important in the classroom? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(10), 929946.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. London, UK: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Review, 3(1), 1620.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 28.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Teaching creativity current findings, trends, and controversies in the psychology of creativity. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 217222.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 187213.Google Scholar
Snow, R. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In Ackerman, P. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 1359). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., Grubert, F., Heffelfinger, C., Hariharan, M., Asabere, A., Waszak, S. M., … Snyder, M. (2010). Variation in transcription factor binding among humans. Science, 232235. doi:10.1126/science.1183621Google Scholar
Solomon, D., Watson, M. S., Delucchi, K. L., Schaps, E., & Battistich, V. (1988). Enhancing children’s prosocial behavior in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 527554.Google Scholar
Stanford Aptitude Seminar, . (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stein, J. (2014). Dyslexia: The role of vision and visual attention. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(4), 267280.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. (1999). Myths in psychology and education regarding the gene-environment debate. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 536553.Google Scholar
Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). All in the family: Is creative writing familial and heritable? Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 177180.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Universtiy Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. S., Kovas, Y., Meaburn, E., & Tolmie, A. (2015) What can the study of genetics offer to educators? Working Paper #12077. Mind, Brain, and Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, W. R., Heath, A. C., Scherrer, J. F., Xian, H., Lin, N., Eisen, S. A., … Tsuang, M. T. (1999). Interrelationship of genetic and environmental influences on conduct disorder and alcohol and marijuana dependence symptoms. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 88(4), 391397.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy Office of Science. (2003). Genomics and its impact on science and society: The Human Genome Project and beyond. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy. Available: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/primer2001/PrimerColor.pdfGoogle Scholar
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., … Beasley, E. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291(5507), 13041351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, S. O., Petrill, S. A., Spinath, F. M., & Plomin, R. (2004). Nature, nurture and academic achievement: A twin study of teacher assessments of 7‐year‐olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 323342.Google Scholar
Woolfolk, A., & Perry, N.E. (2015). Child and adolescent development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×