Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T18:21:02.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Legal Issues Associated with the Introduction of Genetic Testing to the Education System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

Susan Bouregy
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elena L. Grigorenko
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephen R. Latham
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Mei Tan
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Houston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Clinical Laboratory Association. (2013, June 4). Citizens petition to Food & Drug Administration.Google Scholar
American Clinical Laboratory Association. (2014). ACLA retains Attorneys Paul D. Clement and Lawrence H. Tribe to represent ACLA in opposing the FDA’s proposal to treat laboratory developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices. Retrieved from www.acla.com/acla-retains-attorneys-paul-d-clement-and-laurence-h-tribe-to-represent-acla-in-opposing-the-fdas-proposal-to-treat-laboratory-developed-tests-ldts-as-medical-devices/.Google Scholar
Arkansas Code § 6-18-702(d)(4).Google Scholar
Blood Screening of Newborns for Treatable Diseases and Disorders, Code of Massachusetts Regulations Title 105 § 270.006.Google Scholar
Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002).Google Scholar
Boone v. Boozman, 217 F. Supp. 2d 938 (E.D. Ark. 2002).Google Scholar
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2013, October 22). LDT and CLIA FAQs. Retrieved from www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Downloads/LDT-and-CLIA_FAQs.pdf.Google Scholar
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 263a et seq.Google Scholar
College of American Pathologists. (2010, August 15). Comments to the Food and Drug Administration on oversight of laboratory developed tests.Google Scholar
Common Rule Definitions, 45 C.F.R. § 46.102.Google Scholar
Confidentiality of Records of Genetic Tests, New York Civil Rights Law § 79-l.Google Scholar
Douglas County v. Anaya, 694 N.W.2d 601, 608 (Neb. 2005).Google Scholar
E.M. ex rel. E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings, 652 F.3d 999, 1004 (9th Cir. 2011).Google Scholar
Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67, 76 n.9 (2001).Google Scholar
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2017, January 19). Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the “Common Rule”) Final Rule. 82 Fed. Reg. 7,149.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (1997, November 21). Analyte Specific Reagents – Final Rule. 62 Fed. Reg. 62,243, 62,249.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (2007, June 19). Guidance for industry and FDA staff: Pharmacogenetic tests and genetic tests for heritable markers. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071075.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2010, June 10). Letter to 23andMe. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/UCM215240.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2014, January 17). FDA allows marketing for first-of-its-kind post-natal test to help diagnose developmental delays and intellectual disabilities in children. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm382179.htm.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2014, October 3). Draft guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration staff, and clinical laboratories. Framework for regulatory oversight of laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Retrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM416685.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2010, June 17). Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests – Public Meeting & Request for Comments. 75 Fed. Reg. 34,463.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2013, November 22). Warning letter to 23andMe. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/iceci/enforcementactions/warningletters/2013/ucm376296.htm.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2017, January 13). Discussion Paper on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs). Retrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/InVitroDiagnostics/LaboratoryDevelopedTests/UCM536965.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, Pub. L. No. 112–144, § 1143.Google Scholar
Genetic Information Privacy Act, Illinois Compiled Statutes ch. 410 § 513.Google Scholar
Hamburg, M. (2013, June 2). Commissioner’s address, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Speeches/ucm354888.htm.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. pt. 300 et seq.Google Scholar
Larry P. by Lucille P. v. Riles, 793 F.2d 969, 976 (9th Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
Lewin, T. (2010, May 18). College bound, DNA swab in hand. New York Times, p. A14. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/education/19dna.html?_r=1&.Google Scholar
Massachusetts General Laws ch.76 § 15.Google Scholar
McCarthy v. Boozman, 212 F. Supp. 2d 945 (W.D. Ark. 2002).Google Scholar
Minnesota Statutes § 144.125, subdivision 4.Google Scholar
Nebraska Revised Statutes § 71–519.Google Scholar
Newborn Screening Saves Lives Reauthorization Act of 2014, H.R. 1281.Google Scholar
New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 336–37 (1985).Google Scholar
Pergament, D. (2013, Spring). What does choice really mean? Prenatal testing, disability, and special education without illusions. Health Matrix, 23, 55117.Google Scholar
Perrone, M. (2014, January 17). FDA approves genetic test that screens infants for predictors of mental disabilities. The Associated Press. Retrieved from www.ctvnews.ca/health/fda-approves-genetic-test-that-screens-infants-for-predictors-of-mental-disabilities-1.1644306#.Uw9UiFoshj8.email.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. (2010, August 12). U.C. Berkeley alters DNA testing program. Retrieved from http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2010/08/12/dna_change/.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. (2010, September 10). Tempest in a spit cup. Retrieved from http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2010/09/10/tempest_over_dna_testing/.Google Scholar
Sarata, A., & Johnson, J. (2014, March 27). Regulation of clinical tests: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices, laboratory developed tests (LDTs), and genetic tests. Retrieved from www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43438.pdf.Google Scholar
Shuren, J. (2010, July 22). Statement before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm219925.htm.Google Scholar
Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U.S. 757, 767–68 (1996).Google Scholar
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health & Society. (2008). U.S. system of oversight of genetic testing: A response to the charge of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://osp.od.nih.gov/sites/default/files/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Assn., 489 U.S. 602, 618 (1989).Google Scholar
Slaughter, L. et al. (2013, August 9). Letter to the Honorable Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Director, Office of Management and Budget. Retrieved from www.pharmamedtechbi.com/~/media/Supporting%20Documents/The%20Gray%20Sheet/39/33/OMB%20Letter%20080913.pdf.Google Scholar
Spiering v. Heineman, 448 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (D. Neb. 2006).Google Scholar
US Constitution, Amendments 1, 4, 14.Google Scholar
US House of Representatives, Report No. 114 – xxx, Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2017 (2016, April 19).Google Scholar
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×