Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:17:30.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

David Moseley
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Vivienne Baumfield
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Julian Elliott
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Steven Higgins
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Jen Miller
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Douglas P. Newton
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Maggie Gregson
Affiliation:
University of Sunderland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frameworks for Thinking
A Handbook for Teaching and Learning
, pp. 319 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. B. and Wallace, B. (1990). Developing the potential of children in disadvantaged communities: the TASC Project: Thinking Actively in a Social Context. In The Challenge of Excellence: a vision splendid, eds. Braggett, S., Bailey, E. and Robinson, M.. Sydney: The Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented, 250–266.Google Scholar
Adams, H. B. and Wallace, B.(1991). TASC: a model for curriculum development. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adey, P. S. and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adey, P. S., Shayer, M. and Yates, C. (1989). Thinking Science: the curriculum materials of the CASE project. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Adey, P. S., Shayer, M. and Yates, C.(1995). Thinking Science: student and teachers' materials for the CASE intervention, second edn. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Adhami, M., Johnson, D. C. and Shayer, M. (1998). Thinking Maths: the programme for accelerated learning in mathematics. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Ainscow, M. and Tweddle, D. (1988). Encouraging Success. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., Leibham, M. E. and DeBauge, C. (2004). Constructing domain-specific knowledge in kindergarten: relations among knowledge, intelligence and strategic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. R., Feezel, J. D. and Kauffie, F. J. (1967). A taxonomy of concepts and critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments. Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning Occasional Paper No. 9. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Allinson, C. W., Chell, E. and Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psycholog y, 9(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altshuller, G. (translated by L. Shulyak) (1996). And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
Altschuller, G. (translated by L. Shulyak)(1999). 40 Principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
Altschuller, G.(2000). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar
Altshuller, G. S. and Shapiro, R. V. (in Russian) (1956). About a technology of creativity. Questions of Psychology, 6, 37–49.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D. (1983). A consolidation and appraisal of science meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R., Costello, P. and Clarke, S. (1993). Improving the Quality of Argument, 5–16. Hull: The University of Hull.Google Scholar
Apter, M. J. (ed.) (2001). Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: a guide to Reversal Theory. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arter, J. A. and Jenkins, J. R. (1979). Differential diagnosis–prescriptive teaching: a critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.Google Scholar
Ashman, A. F. and Conway, R. N. F. (1997). An Introduction to Cognitive Education: theory and applications. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1967). Learning Theory and Classroom Practice. OISE Bulletin No. 1. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P.(1968). Educational Psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P.(1978). Educational Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. and Robinson, F. G. (1969). School Learning: an introduction to educational psycholog y. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bachelor, P., Michael, W. B. and Kim, S. (1994). First-order and higher-order semantic and figural factors in structure-of-intellect divergent production measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The Psychology of Memory. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D.(1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. VIII: Recent advances in research and theory, ed. Bower, G. H.. New York: Academic Press, 47–90.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailin, S. (1998). Education, knowledge and critical thinking. In Education, Knowledge and Truth, ed. Carr, D.. London: Routledge, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B. (1993). A Conception of Critical Thinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment. Province of British Columbia: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B.(1999a). Common misconceptions of critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B.(1999b). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkley, R. A. (1996). Linkages between attention and executive functions. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 307–325.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). Essential Difference: men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Baumfield, V. M. (2004). Thinking for yourself and thinking together: the community of inquiry as a pedagogy for self-regulated learning. In Thinking about Thinking: what educators need to know, eds. Ee, J., Chang, A. and Tan, O. S.. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Baumfield, V., Higgins, S. and Lin, M. (2002). Thinking through teaching: professional development for innovation and autonomy. Education Review, London: National Union of Teachers, 61–67.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1987). The affective dimension of learning: faculty–student relationships that enhance intellectual development. College Student Journal, 21, 46–58.Google Scholar
Baxter Magolda, M. B.(1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Begab, M. J. (1980). Foreward. In Instrumental Enrichment: an intervention for cognitive modifiability, eds. R. Feuerstein, Y. Rand, M. Hoffman and R. Miller. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, xv.Google Scholar
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bidell, T. R. and Fischer K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: action, structure and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In Intellectual Development, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Berg, C. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–140.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Biggs, J.(1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning – the SOLO taxonomy, first edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F.(1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement, ed. Rowe, H. A. H.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 57–66.Google Scholar
Blagg, N., Ballinger, M. and Gardner, R. (1988). Somerset Thinking Skills Course Handbook. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blagg, N. R., Lewis, R. E. and Ballinger, M. P. (1993). Thinking and Learning at Work: A report on the development and evaluation of the thinking skills at work modules. Sheffield: Department of Employment.Google Scholar
Blatz, C. V. (1992). Contextual limits on reasoning and testing for critical thinking. In The Generalisability of Critical Thinking: multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, ed. Norris, S. P.. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 206–222.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekaerts, M. and Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 417–450.Google Scholar
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boekaerts, M. and Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Leren en Instructie. Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces. Assen: Dekker van de Vegt.Google Scholar
Borkowski, J. E. (1985). Signs of intelligence: strategy generalization and metacognition. In The Growth of Reflective Thought in Children, ed. Yussen, R. S.. New York: Academic Press, 105–144.Google Scholar
Borkowski, J. G. and Burke, J. E. (1996). Theories, models, and measurements of executive functioning: an information processing perspective. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 235–261.Google Scholar
Borkowski, J. G. and Nicholson, J. (2004). Executive functioning: towards a research agenda on higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkowski, J. G., Weaver, C. M., Smith, L. E. and Akai, C. E. (2004). Metacognitive theory and classroom practices: links between motivation and executive functioning. In Thinking about Thinking: what educators need to know, eds. Ee, J., Chang, A. and Tan, O. S.. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1995). The SOLO taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 14(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1992). The Environmental Sciences. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. (2003). Jean Piaget, learning research, and American education. In Educational Psychology: A century of contributions, eds. Zimmerman, B. J. and Schunk, D. H.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 251–287.Google Scholar
Brody, N. (2003a). Construct validation of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test: comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, N.(2003b). What Sternberg should have concluded. Intelligence, 31, 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronowski, J. (1967). Human and Animal Languages. Vol. I. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J.(1977). Human and animal languages. In A Sense of the future, ed. Bronowski, J.. Cambridge, MD: MIT Press, 104–131.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2002). The Right to Learn: alternatives for a learning society. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büchel, F. P., Schlatter, C. and Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning dificulties. In Educational and Child Psycholog y, 14, 109–120.Google Scholar
Burr, A. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D. L. and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A. and Plucker, J. (1997). Project START: using a multiple intelligences model in identifying and promoting talent in high risk students. University of Connecticut Technical Report. Storrs, CT: National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. and Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple Intelligences and Student Achievement: success stories from six schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Cardellini, L. and Pascual-Leone, J. (2004). On mentors. Cognitive development, education and constructivism: an interview with Juan Pascual-Leone. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B.(2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors. In The Scientific Study of General Intelligence, ed. Nyborg, H.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5–21.Google Scholar
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual Development: birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Case, R. and Daniels, L. R. B. (eds.) (2000). Critical Challenges Across the Curriculum. Burnaby, BC: Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1971). Thinking. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. I. and Nealon, J. (1979). An analysis of short-term memory differences between retardates and nonretardates. Intelligence, 3, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. and Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and Thought: a psychological introduction. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Collis, K. F. and Biggs, J. B. (1982). Developmental determinants of qualitative aspects of school learning. In Learning and Teaching Cognitive Skills, ed. Evans, G. T.. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research, 185–207.Google Scholar
Collis, K. and Romberg, T. A. (1991). Assessment of mathematical performance: an analysis of open-ended test items. In Testing and Cognition, eds. Wittrock, M. C. and Baker, E. L.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 82–130.Google Scholar
Colom, R., Rebolloa, I., Palaciosa, A., Juan-Espinosa, M. and Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte, A. (1830–42). Cours de philosophie positive (6 vols.). Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corno, L. and Randi, J. (1999). A design theory for classroom instruction in self-regulated learning? In Instructional Design Theory and Models: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Vol. II, ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 293–318.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. (ed.) (1991). Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking(Vol. I). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. (ed.)(2001) Developing Minds. Vol. I: a resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. and Kallick, B. (2000a). Discovering and exploring habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 1). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. and Kallick, B.(2000b). Activating and engaging habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 2). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L., Kallick, B. and Perkins, D. (2000). Assessing and reporting on habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 3). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. and Paxton, D. (1999). Multiple assessments for multiple intelligences. Focus On Basics, 3(1) http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ncsall/fob/1999/paxton.htmGoogle Scholar
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the Grade: a self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and Memory: an integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the Primary Curriculum: framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Craik, K. (1943). The Nature of Explanation. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creer, T. L. (2000). Self-management of chronic illness. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 601–629.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In Theories of creativity, eds. Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. S.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 190–212.Google Scholar
Damon, W. (1995). Greater Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dare, D. E. (2001). Learner-Centred Instructional Practices Supporting the New Vocationalism. New directions for community colleges, No.115. John Wiley, and Sons Inc, 81–91.CrossRef
Bono, E. (1976). Teaching Thinking. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Bono, E.(1983). The direct teaching of thinking as a skill. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 703–708.Google Scholar
Bono, E.(1985). Six Thinking Hats. New York: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
Bono, E.(1987). Letters to Thinkers. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
de Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. and , de Ven A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: a design experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 531–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Landsheere, V. (1989). Taxonomies of objectives. In The International Encyclopaedia of Educational Technology, ed. Eraut, M.. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A. (1990). Structural and developmental relations between formal and post formal capacities: towards a comprehensive theory of adolescent and adult cognitive development. In Adult Development: Vol. II. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 147–173.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A.(1993). On the quest of the functional architecture of developing mind. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A.(1998a). Cognitive development. In Lifespan Developmental Psychology, eds. Demetriou, A., Doise, W. and Lieshout, K. F. M.. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A.(1998b). A three-level theory of the developing mind: basic principles and implications for instruction and assessment. In Intelligence, Instruction, and Assessment: theory into practice, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Williams, W. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 149–199.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A.(2000). Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: toward a general theory. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 209–251.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G. and Platsidou, M. (2002). The Development of Mental Processing: Efficiency, working memory, and thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (1, Serial No. 268).
Demetriou, A. and Efklides, A. (1985). Structure and sequence of formal and post-formal thought: general patterns and individual differences. Child Development, 56, 1062–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Efklides, A. and Platsidou, M. (1993). The Architecture and Dynamics of Developing Mind: experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (5–6, Serial No. 234).CrossRef
Demetriou, A. and Kazi, S. (2001). Unity and Modularity in the Mind and the Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A. and Raftopoulos, A. (1999). Modeling the developing mind: from structure to change. Developmental Review 19, 319–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denckla, M. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 263–278.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the reflective process, revised edn. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Dewey, J.(1938). Logic: the theory of inquiry. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Dewey, J.(1958). Experience and Nature, second edn. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Dosher, B. A. (2003). Working memory. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. Nadel, L.. London: Nature Publishing Group, 569–577.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (2004). Multiple intelligences: its tensions and possibilities. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, L. and Paul, R. (1998). Critical thinking: developing intellectual traits. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(3), 34–35.Google Scholar
Eliasmith, C. (1996). The third contender: a critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 9(4), 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. G. (2000). The psychological assessment of children with learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, N. S. and Kocovski, N. L. (2000). Self-regulation and distress in clinical psychology. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 569–599.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32, 81–111.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. B. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 9–26.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1991). Critical thinking: a streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1996). Critical thinking dispositions: their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2 and 3), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H.(1998). Is critical thinking culturally biased? Teaching Philosophy, 21(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H. and Millman, J. (1985). Cornell Critical Thinking Test, level Z. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. and Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.Google Scholar
Eslinger, P. J. (1996). Conceptualizing, describing, and measuring components of executive function: a summary. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 367–396.Google Scholar
Facione, P. A. (1990). The Delphi Report. Millbrae CA: California Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fashola, O. S., and Slavin, R. E. (1997). Effective and replicable programs for students placed at risk in elementary and middle schools (Grant No. R-117D-40005). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R. and Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: intervention programme for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R, Falik, L. H., and Feuerstein, R. S. (1998). The learning propensity assessment device: an alternative approach to the assessment of learning potential. In Advances in Cross-cultural Assessment, eds. Samuda, R. J., Feuerstein, R., Kaufman, A. S., Lewis, J. E. and Sternberg, R. J.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 100–161.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R. and Jensen, M. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: theoretical basis, goals and instruments. The Educational Forum, 44, 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. and Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Finster, D. (1989). Developmental instruction part 1: Perry's model of intellectual development. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 659–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finster, D.(1991). Developmental instruction part 2: application of the Perry model to general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishback, S. J. and Polson, C. J. (1998). The cognitive development of adult undergraduate students. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, eds. Wood, G. S. Jr. and Webber, M. M.. Muncie, IN: Ball State University, 81–86.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching Thinking. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In The Nature of Intelligence, ed. Resnick, L.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231–236.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E. and Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 14(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, R. C. and Lee, S. W. (1996). Differentiating instructions for high-achieving/gifted children in regular classrooms: a field test of three gifted-education models. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19 (4), 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R. and Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusco, E. T. (1983). The relationship between children's cognitive level of development and their response to literature. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hofstra University, New York.
Gagné, R. M. (1965). Conditions of Learning, first edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. M.(1985). Conditions of Learning, second edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: the theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H.(1993). Frames of Mind: the theory of multiple intelligence, second edn. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H.(1999). Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H.(2004). Audiences for the theory of multiple intelligences. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M. L., and Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: multiple perspectives. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiselman, R. E. and Fisher, R. P. (1985). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice, December, 1–4.Google Scholar
Gerlach, V. and Sullivan, A. (1967). Constructing Statements of Outcomes. Inglewood, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
Glatthorn, A. A. and Baron, J. (1991). The good thinker. In Developing Minds. Vol. I: a resource book for teaching thinking, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 49–53.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottredson, L. S.(2003b). On Sternberg's ‘Reply to Gottfredson’. Intelligence, 31, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouge, K. and Yates, C. (2002) Creating a CA programme in the arts: the Wigan LEA arts project. In Learning Intelligence: cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years, eds. Shayer, M. and Adey, P.. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Govier, T. (1988). Ways of teaching reasoning directly. In Critical Thinking: proceedings of the first British conference on informal logic and critical thinking, ed. Fisher, A.. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 30–38.Google Scholar
Graham, S. and Harris, K. R. (1996). Addressing problems in attention, memory, and executive functioning. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 349–365.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (ed.) (1987). The Oxford Companion to The Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregson M. (2003). Learning to be reflective. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Griffin, S. and Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: an approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 3(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L. and Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groth-Marnat, G. (1997). Handbook of Psychological Assessment, third edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Gruber, H., Law, L. C., Mandl, H. and Renkl, A. (1999). Situated learning and transfer: implications for teaching. In Learners, Learning and Assessment, ed. Murphy, P.. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 214–30.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P.(1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P.(1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P.(1977). Way Beyond the IQ: guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P.(1980). Cognitive styles: what are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P.(1982). Cognitive psychology's ambiguities: some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P.(1983). Transformation abilities of functions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P.(1986). Creative Talents: their nature, uses and development. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Ltd.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. and Hoepfner, R. (1971). The Analysis of Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J.-E. and Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In Handbook of Educational Psychology, eds. Berliner, D. C. and Calfer, R. C.. New York: MacMillan, 186–242.Google Scholar
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, eds. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. and Mahwah, A. C., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–23.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1984). Thought and Knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Larwence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F.(1994). A national assessment of critical thinking skills in adults: taking steps toward the goal. In The National Assessment of College Student Learning: identification of the skills to be taught, learned and assessed, ed. Greenwood, A.. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 24–64.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F.(1997). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: a brief edition of thought and knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F.(2002). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking, fourth edn (workbook). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hamers, J. H. M. and Overtoom, M. T. (1997). Teaching Thinking in Europe. Utrecht: Sardes.Google Scholar
Handley, S. J., Capon, A., Beveridge, M., Dennis, I. and Evans, J. St. B. T. (2004). Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannafin, M. J., and Hooper, S. (1989). An integrated framework for CBI screen design and layout. Computers in Human Behavior, 5(3), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, L. S. and Michaelis, J. U. (1977). A comprehensive framework for instructional objectives: a guide to systematic planning and evaluation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2002). What are the attributes of excellent teachers? Paper presented at the New Zealand Council for Educational Research Annual Conference, the University of Auckland. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/hattie02.pdf
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., and Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauenstein, A. D. (1972). Curriculum planning for behavioral development. Worthington, OH: Charles A, Jones Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hauenstein, A. D.(1998). A Conceptual Framework for Educational Objectives: a holistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hawkins, W. and Hedberg, J. G. (1986). Evaluating LOGO: use of the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 103–109.Google Scholar
Hawley, W. E. (1967). Programmed Instruction. In Training and development handbook, eds. Craig, R. L. and Bittel, L. R.. New York: McGraw Hill, 225–250.Google Scholar
Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H. and Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright Start: cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge Publishing.Google Scholar
Herrmann, N. (1989). The Creative Brain. Lake Lure: NC: Brain Books, The Ned Herrmann Group.Google Scholar
Herrmann, N.(1996). The Whole Brain Business Book. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Higgins, S. and Baumfield, V. (1998). A defence of teaching general thinking skills. Journal of Philosophy of Education 32(3), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, S., Baumfield, V., Lin, M., Moseley, D., Butterworth, M., Downey, G., Gregson, M., Oberski, I., Rockett, M. and Thacker, D. (2004). Thinking skills approaches to effective teaching and learning: what is the evidence for impact on learners. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a multiple intelligences school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Hofer, B. and Pintrich, P. (1997).The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing in relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, J. and Knapp, J. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W. and Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: reality or myth? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illeris, K. (2004). The Three Dimensions of Learning, second edn. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press/Niace Publications.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of Learning: on becoming an individual in society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jewell, P. (1996). A reasoning taxonomy for gifted children. Paper presented in Adelaide at the national conference of the Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented. http://www.nexus.edu.au/teachstud/gat/jewell1.htm
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 45(1), 65–95.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D.(1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: a new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II), ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 215–239.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H.(2000). Toward a meta-theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K. and Yacci, M. (1993). Structural Knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Hannum, W. H. and Tessmer, M. (1989). Handbook of Task Analysis Methods. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Prevish, T., Christy, D. and Stavurlaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the web: aggregate planning in a business management course. Distance Education: an International Journal, 20(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H. and Tessmer, M. (1996/97). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation and research. Training Research Journal, 2, 11–46.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M. and Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1996). A capacity theory of comprehension, Psychological Review, 103, 773–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R. and Pellegrino, J. W. (1985). Human Intelligence: perspectives and prospects. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Kallio, E. (1995). Systematic reasoning: formal or post formal cognition? Journal of Adult Development, 2(3) 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavale, K. A. and Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54(3), 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepner, C. and Tregoe, B. (1965). The Rational Manager. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Kezar, A. (2001). Theory of Multiple Intelligences: implications for higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 26(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. M. and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kitchener, K. S. and King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: concepts of justifications and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. J. and Phye, G. D. (1994). Cognitive Training for Children. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Klausmeier, H. J., Quilling, M. R., Sorenson, J. S., Way, R. S. and Glasrud, G. R. (1971). Individually Guided Education and the Multiunit Elementary School: guidelines for implementation. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.Google Scholar
Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to ‘learning styles’ and ‘multiple intelligences’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 45–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1990). Which postformal levels are stages? In Adult Development Vol. II: models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 263–268.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Koplowitz, H. (1984). A projection beyond Piaget's formal-operations stage: a general system stage and a unitary stage. In Beyond Formal Operations: late adolescent and adult cognitive development, eds. Commons, M., Richards, F. and Armon, C.. New York: Praeger, 272–295.Google Scholar
Koplowitz, H.(1987). Post-logical thinking. In Thinking: the second international conference, eds. Perkins, D. N., Lochhead, J. and Bishop, J.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 213–232.Google Scholar
Koplowitz, H.(1990). Unitary consciousness and the highest development of mind: The relation between spiritual development and cognitive development. In Adult Development: Vol. II. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 105–111.Google Scholar
Kornhaber, M. L. (2004). Multiple intelligences: from the ivory tower to the dusty classroom – but why? Teachers College Record, 106(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhaber, M. L., Fierros, E. and Veenema, S. (2004). Multiple Intelligences: Best ideas from theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kornhaber, M. L. and Krechevsky, M. (1995). Expanding definitions of teaching and learning: Notes from the MI underground. In Transforming Schools, eds. Cookson, P. and Schneider, B.. New York: Garland Press, 181–208.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological Tools: a sociocultural approach to education. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A.(2002). Sociocultural theory and the Mediated Learning Experience. School Psychology International, 23(1), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, D. B., Bloom, B. S. and Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Kreitzer, A. E. and Madaus, G. F. (1994). Empirical investigations of the hierarchical structure of the taxonomy. In Bloom's Taxonomy: a forty-year retrospective. Ninety-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Part II, eds. Anderson, L. W. and Sosniak, L. A.. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 64–81.Google Scholar
Kuhn, D., and Pearsall, S. (1998). Relations between metastrategic knowledge and strategic performance. Cognitive Development, 13, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, R. D. and Nadel, L. (2000). Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, D. and Gordon, P. (2002). A History of Western Educational Ideas. London: Woburn Press.Google Scholar
Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through Geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.Google Scholar
Leat, D. and Higgins, S. (2002). The role of powerful pedagogical strategies in curriculum development. The Curriculum Journal, 13, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education, first edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipman, M.(1995). Caring as Thinking. Inquiry: Critical thinking across the disciplines. 15(1).Google Scholar
Lipman, M.(2003). Thinking in Education, second edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, M.(2004). Interview on Philosophy for Children. http://www.buf.no/e_resources/e_resources_c_3.html
Loehlin, J. C. (1992) Genes and Environment in Personality Development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Losee, J. (1993). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, third edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A. and Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75(5), 1357–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N. (eds.) (1996). Attention, Memory and Executive Function. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Madaus, G. F., Woods, E. N. and Nuttal, R. L. (1973). A causal model analysis of Bloom's taxonomy. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mager, R. F. and Beach, K. H. (1967). Developing Vocational Instruction. Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.Google Scholar
Maltby, F. (1995). The use of TASC to develop a selection of tools for effective thinking. Gifted Education International, 11(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
Mann, D. (2001). TRIZ thinking hats. TRIZ Journal. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/03/b/index.htm
Mann, D.(2002). Hands-on Systematic Innovation. Ieper, Belgium: CREAX Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (2001). Some reflections on post-formal thought. The Genetic Epistemologist, 29(3).Google Scholar
Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, Thinking and Cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). Critical thinking for a humane world. In The Generalisability of Critical Thinking: multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, ed. Norris, S. P.. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 163–180.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J.(1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. www.mcrel.org/topics/productDetail.asp?topicsID=6&productID=83, 24 December 2002.
Marzano, R. J.(2001a). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J.(2001b). A new taxonomy of educational objectives. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, third edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 181–188.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C. and Suhor, C (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2002). A step toward redesigning Bloom's taxonomy. Contemporary Psychology APA Review of Books, 47(8), 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton: D. van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D. and Costa, P. T. (1987) Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging. 2, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuinness, C., Curry, C., Greer, B., Daly, P. and Salters, M. (1997). Final Report on the ACTS project: Phase two. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment.Google Scholar
McPeck, J. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Meeker, M. N. (1969). The Structure of Intellect: its uses and interpretation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., Dawes, L., Sams, C. and Higgins, S. (2002). Language, Thinking and ICT in the Primary Curriculum: final project report to the Nuffield Foundation. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: an overview of their current status, ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 279–333.Google Scholar
Merrill, M. D.(2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, M. D., Jones, M. K. and Li, Zhongmin (1992). Instructional design theory: classes of transactions. Educational Technology, 32(6), 12–26.Google Scholar
Merrill, M. D., Li, Zhongmin and Jones, M. K. (1990a). Limitations of first generation instructional design (ID1). Educational Technology, 30(1), 7–11.Google Scholar
Merrill, M. D., Li, Zhongmin and Jones, M. K.(1990b). Second generation instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J. and Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory Improved: reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult Education, 28, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezirow, J.(1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P. and Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130(4), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, W. E. (1968). Creative and Critical Thinking. London: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Moore, W. S. (1988). The Measure of Intellectual Development: an instrument manual. Olympia, WA: Center for the Study of Intellectual Development.Google Scholar
Moore, W. S.(1989). The learning environment preferences: exploring the construct validity of an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 504–514.Google Scholar
Morris, R. D. (1996). Relationships and distinctions among the concepts of attention, memory, and executive function. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore: Paul Brookes, 11–16.Google Scholar
Moseley, D. V., Baumfield, V., Higgins, S., Lin, M., Miller, J., Newton, D., Robson, S., Elliott, J. and Gregson, M. (2004). Thinking skill frameworks for post-16 learners: an evaluation. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. http://www.lsda.org.uk/pubs/dbaseout/download.asp?code=1541
Moseley, D., Elliott, J., Gregson, M. and Higgins, S. (2005). Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training. British Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murris, K. and Haynes, J. (2001). Storywise: Thinking through stories. Newport: Dialogue Works.Google Scholar
Nathan, P. E. (1987). What do behavioral scientists know – and what can they do – about alcoholism? In Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1986 (pp. 1–25). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
National Education Goals Panel (1991). The National Education Goals Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Neber, H. and Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, D. P. (2000) Teaching for Understanding. London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom's taxonomy with multiple intelligences: a planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. P. and Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press and Software.Google Scholar
Nosich, G. M. (2000). Learning to think things through: a guide to critical thinking across the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ohbayashi, M., Konishi, S. and Miyashita, Y. (2003). Executive function, models of. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. Nadel, L.. London: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom's taxonomy and the objectives of education. Educational Research, 17, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica 32, 301–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J.(1988) Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: a dialectical causal account of cognitive development. In The Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development: towards an integration, ed. Demetriou, A.. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 25–64.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1982) Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense: a focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic Newsletter, 4(2), 2–7.Google Scholar
Paul, R. W. (1985). Bloom's taxonomy and critical thinking instruction. Educational Leadership, 42(8), 36–39.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1987). Dialogical thinking: critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 127–148.Google Scholar
Paul, R. W. (1991). Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, Vol. I, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1993). Critical Thinking – what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, third edn. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2001). Critical Thinking: tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pederson, N. L., Plomin, R. and McClearn, G. E. (1994). Is there a G beyond g? (Is there genetic influence on specific cognitive abilities independent of genetic influence on general cognitive ability?)Intelligence, 18, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, E. A. (1971). The Nature of Adolescent Judgement. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, D., Jay, E. and Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: a dispositional theory of thinking. The Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. Jr. (1968). Patterns of Development in Thought and Values of Students in a Liberal Arts College: a validation of a scheme. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Bureau of Study Counsel.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. Jr.(1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: a scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Petty, G. (1997). How to be Better at Creativity. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Petty, G.(1998). Teaching Today, second edn. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (first published in French, 1947) (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J.(1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 451–502.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. and Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. and Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In Metacognitive Assessment, eds. Schraw, G. and Impara, J.. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute/The University of Nebraska, 43–97.Google Scholar
Pithers, R. T. and Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: a review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: towards a postcritical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. and Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of Mind. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Presseisen, B. Z. (1988). At-risk Students and Thinking: perspectives from research. Washington, DC: National Education Association Publications and Research for Better Schools, Inc.Google Scholar
Presseisen, B. Z.(1991). Thinking skills: meanings and models revisited. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, first edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 47–53.Google Scholar
Presseisen, B. Z.(2001).Thinking skills: meanings and models revisited. In Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, third edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 47–53.Google Scholar
Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M. and Associates (1990). Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cambridge, MD: Brookline.Google Scholar
Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
Quellmalz, E. S. (1987). Developing reasoning skills. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. R. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 86–105.Google Scholar
Quellmalz, E. S. and Hoskyn, J. A. (1988). Making a difference in Arkansas: the multicultural reading and thinking project. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 52–55.Google Scholar
Rabbit, P. (1997). Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ree, M. J. and Earles, J. A. (1991) Predicting training success: not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(3), 13–20.Google Scholar
Reigeluth, C. M.(1997). Instructional theory, practitioner needs, and new directions: some reflections. Educational Technology, 37(1), 42–47.Google Scholar
Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.) (1999). Instructional Design Theory and Models, Vol. II: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reigeluth, C. and Stein, F. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In Instructional Design Theories and Models, ed. Reigeluth, C.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 335–381.
Renzulli, J. S. (1975). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. In Psychology and Education of the Gifted, eds. Barbe, W. B. and Renzulli, J. S.. New York: Irvington, 55–65.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S.(1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model for creative productivity. In Conceptions of Giftedness, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, B. J. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–92.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. (ed.) (1989). Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.Google Scholar
Richelle, M. and Feuerstein, R. (1957). Enfants Juifs Nord-Africains. Jerusalem: Youth Aliyah.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. M. and Edwards, J. (1996). Creative thinking instruction for aboriginal children. Learning and Instruction, 6(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W. and Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The Prefrontal Cortex: executive and cognitive functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romine, C. B. and Reynolds, C. R. (2004). Sequential memory: a developmental perspective on its relation to frontal lobe functioning. Neuropsychological Review, 14, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing Instructional Systems: decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Romiszowski, A. J.(1984). Producing Instructional Systems: lesson planning for individualized and group learning activities. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Romney, D. M. and Samuels, M. T. (2001). A meta-evaluation of Feuerstein's Instrumental Enrichment. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(4), 19–34.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1992). Children's divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12, 223–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamatov, Y. (1999). TRIZ: The right solution at the right time. Hattem, Netherlands: Insytec B.V.Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (1979a). Learning in the learner's perspective I – some common-sense conceptions. Reports from the Institute of Education No 76. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.Google Scholar
Säljö, R.(1979b). Learning in the learner's perspective II – differences in awareness. Reports from the Institute of Education No 77. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.Google Scholar
Salovey, P. and Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition and making sense in mathematics. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, ed. Grouws, D. A.. New York: MacMillan, 334–370.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: issues and educational applications, eds. Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 75–99.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.) (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seels, B. (1997). Taxonomic issues and the development of theory in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37, 12–21.Google Scholar
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Century.Google Scholar
Shayer, M. and Adey, P. (2002). Learning Intelligence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Skuy, M., Dunn, M., Durbach, F., Mentis, M., Gibson, M., Muller, F. and Lazar, C. (1991). Cognitive Functions and Dysfunctions Working Manual. Johannesburg: Cognitive Research Programme, Division of Specialised Education, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (1979). Taxonomy in Britain. Report of the Review Group on Taxonomy (Chairman E. Smith). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2002). Thinking skills: the question of generality. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 659–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. C. P. and Apter, M. J. (1975). A Theory of Psychological Reversals. Chippenham: Picton.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1996). The social construction of rational understanding. In Piaget-Vygotsky: the social genesis of thought, eds. Tryphon, A. and Vonèche, J.. Hove: Psychology Press, 107–22.Google Scholar
Smith, M. K. (2002). ‘Howard Gardner and multiple intelligence’, the encyclopedia of informal education. http:www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm
Splitter, L. and Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for Better Thinking: the classroom community of enquiry. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Spodak, R. (1999). Executive functioning – what is it and how does it affect learning? Washington Parent. http://www.washingtonparent.co.articles/9906/executive-functioning.htm
Stahl, R. J., and Murphy, G. T. (1981). The domain of cognition: An alternative to Bloom's cognitive domain within the framework of an information processing model. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 511.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(1986). Critical thinking: its nature, measurement and improvement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED272882.
Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(1998). Principles of teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 33, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: a theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2002a). Raising the achievement of all students: teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2002b). Review of ‘The Psychology of Intelligence’ by J. Piaget. Intelligence, 30, 482–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2003a). Cognitive Psychology, third edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2003b). Issues in the theory and measurement of successful intelligence: a reply to Brody. Intelligence, 31, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2003c). Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2003d). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices and outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(2), 6–18.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2004a). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J.(2004b). North American approaches to intelligence. In International Handbook of Intelligence, ed. Resnick, L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.(2004, submitted). The Rainbow project collaborators, and the University of Michigan Business School project collaborators. Theory-based university admissions testing for a new millennium. Educational Psychologist, 39, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. and Bhana, K. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effectiveness of intellectual skills programs. Intelligence 5, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., and Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. (2000/2001). Guilford's structure of intellect model and model of creativity: contributions and limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3 and 4), 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. S. and Grigorenko, E. L.(2002). Dynamic Testing: the nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiggins, R. J., Rubel, E., and Quellmalz, E. S. (1988). Measuring Thinking Skills in the Classroom, revised edn. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library.Google Scholar
Stott, D. H., Marston, N. C. and Neill, S. J. (1975). Taxonomy of Behaviour Disturbance. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Strand, P. S., Barnes-Holmes, Y. and Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Educating the whole child: implications of behaviorism as a science of meaning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H. L. (1999). Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, H. L.(2000). Searching for the best cognitive model for instructing students with learning disabilities: a component and composite analysis. Educational and Child Psychology, 17(3), 101–120.Google Scholar
Swanson, H. L. and Sáez, L. (2003). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In Handbook of Learning Disabilities, eds. Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R. and Graham, S.. New York: Guilford Press, 182–198.Google Scholar
Swartz, R. J. and Parks, S. (1994) Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Teaching into Content Instruction: a lesson design handbook for the elementary grades. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Books and Software.Google Scholar
ten Dam, G. and Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14, 359–379.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1996). Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thayer-Bacon, B. (1998). Transforming and redescribing critical thinking: constructive thinking. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torgensen, J. K. (1996). A model of memory from an information processing perspective: the special case of phonological memory. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore: Paul Brookes, 157–184.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. MacMillan: New York.Google Scholar
Trickey, S. and Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Horst, H. (2000). A problem solving strategy for gifted learners in South Africa. Gifted Education International, 15(1), 103–110.CrossRef
Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91, 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gelder, T. and Port, R. (1995). It's about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In Mind as Motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition, eds. Port, R. F. and Gelder, T.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Gelder, T. J. (2000). Learning to reason: a Reason!–Able approach. In Cognitive Science in Australia, 2000. Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Society Conference, eds. Davis, C., Gelder, T. J. and Wales, R.. Adelaide: Causal.Google Scholar
van Gelder, T. J.(2001). Critical thinking: some lessons learned. Adult Learning Australia, Adult Learning Commentary Number 12.
Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Velmans, M. (2000). Understanding consciousness. London: Routledge/Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (1992). Learning styles and regulation of learning processes in higher education: towards a process-oriented instruction in independent thinking. Doctoral dissertation. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D.(1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: a phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. D.(1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of General Systems Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 139–164.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). The Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, B. (2001). Teaching Thinking Skills across the Primary Curriculum: a practical approach for all abilities. London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
Wallace, B.(2003). What are the learning experiences that gifted and talented children need in order to develop life skills? Gifted and Talented, 7(2), 49–53.Google Scholar
Wallace, B., Adams, H. B., Maltby, F., and Mathfield, J. (1993). TASC: Thinking actively in a social context. Bicester: AB Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1986). An Attribution Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinert, F. E. and Weinert, S. (1998). History and systems of developmental psychology. In Life-span Developmental Psychology, eds. Demetriou, A., Doise, W. and Lieshout, C.. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1–33.Google Scholar
Welsh, M. C. and Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive Thinking (enlarged edn). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
White, J. (1998). Do Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences add up?London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Whyte, J. (2003). Bad Thoughts: a guide to clear thinking. London: Corvo.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom Ideas for Encouraging Thinking and Feeling. Buffalo, NY: DOK Publishers.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E.(1972). A Total Creativity Program for Individualising and Humanising the Learning Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Williams, F.(1980). The Creativity Assessment Packet. Nerang East QLD: Pro-Ed Australia.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E.(1986). The cognitive–affective intervention model for enriching gifted programs. In Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, ed. Renzulli, J. S.. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 461–484.Google Scholar
Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., and Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence. Developmental Review, 22, 162–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winne, P. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, B. Y. L. and Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, R. (1977). Multiple choice: a state of the art report. Evaluation in Education, 1, 191–280.Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L. (1980). Kenneth Craik: the man and his work. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M. and Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: directions and challenges for future research. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 750–769.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (1999) A comparison of U.S. and Chinese university students' cognitive development: the cross-cultural applicability of Perry's theory. The Journal of Psychology, 133(4), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 29, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J.(1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In Self-Regulated Learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice, eds. Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J.. New York: Guilford, 1–19.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 13–39.Google Scholar