Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents – summary
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Sources
- Part II The foreign relations power
- Part III Foreign relations and the individual
- Part IV The foreign state
- 10 Personality and representation
- 11 The claimant state
- 12 The defendant state
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
10 - Personality and representation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents – summary
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Sources
- Part II The foreign relations power
- Part III Foreign relations and the individual
- Part IV The foreign state
- 10 Personality and representation
- 11 The claimant state
- 12 The defendant state
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The foreign state in the municipal legal system
The legal problems of foreign relations law treated in Part IV of this work are all concerned with the manner in which the organs of the Anglo-Commonwealth state – executive, legislature and judiciary – deal with the position of the foreign state within the municipal legal system. These issues may most conveniently be considered in three chapters:
(1) Chapter 10 deals with the legal personality of the foreign state within the municipal legal system: its status and recognition; the effect of non-recognition of states on the vindication of private rights and interests; and the representation of states – the manner in which governmental competence to represent the foreign state is determined. These issues are fundamental predicates to the rest of Part IV, since it will only be where there is a legal person competent to act within the municipal legal system through duly authorised representatives that rights may be asserted by or against it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Foreign Relations Law , pp. 377 - 418Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
Taylor v Barclay (1828) 2 Sim 213, 221, 57 ER 769, per Shadwell V-C, citing Lord Eldon
Arab Monetary Fund v Hashim (No 3) [1991] 2 AC 114, 165, (1991) 85 ILR 1 (HL)
Sloman v The Governor and Government of New Zealand (1876) 1 CPD 563, 566 (CA)
Hansard, HL, vol 408, Written Answers, cols 1121, 28 April 1980, (1980) 51 BYIL 367
Halsbury 2010, [33]
Halsbury 2010, [33]
Hansard, HL, vol 408, Written Answers, cols 1121–2, 28 April 1980, (1980) 51 BYIL 367
Hansard, HC, vol 983, Written Answers, cols 277–9, 25 April 1980 per Sir Ian Gilmour
Hansard, HL, vol 409, Written Answers, col 1098, 23 May 1980, (1980) 51 BYIL 368
Hansard, HC, vol 985, Written Answers, col 385, 23 May 1980, per Sir Ian Gilmour
Hansard, HC, vol 160, Written Answers, col 494, 16 November 1989
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 & 5) [2002] 2 AC 883, (2000) 125 ILR 602 (CA)
Hansard, HC, vol 81, Written Answers, col 149, 19 June 1985, (1985) 56 BYIL 389
In re Al-Fin Corporation’s Patent [1970] Ch 160, (1969) 52 ILR 68
Hansard (Aust), Sen, 20 August 1991, 661–3, (1991) 13 AYIL 231–2
Attorney General for Fiji v Robert Jones House Ltd [1989] 2 NZLR 69, 71, (1988) 80 ILR 1
Controller and Auditor-General v Davison [1996] 2 NZLR 278, 299, (1996) 104 ILR 526 (CA) per Richardson J
R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, ex p Trawnik, The Times, 18 April 1985
Taylor v Barclay (1828) 2 Sim 213, 57 ER 769
Duff Development Co Ltd v Government of Kelantan [1924] AC 797, 805–6, (1924) 2 ILR 124 (HL)
Duff Development Co v Government of Kelantan [1924] AC 797, 813, (1924) 2 ILR 124
City of Berne v Bank of England (1804) 9 Ves Jun 347, 32 ER 636
Dolder v Bank of England (1805) 10 Ves Jun 352, 32 ER 881
Jones v Garcia del Rio (1823) T & R 297, 37 ER 1113
Kinder v Taylor (1825) 3 LJ (OS) Ch 68
R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, ex p Trawnik, The Times, 21 February 1986 (CA), Transcript, 2
The Times, 18 April 1985, but on narrower grounds
The Gagara [1919] P 95, (1919) 1 ILR 45 (CA)
The Annette [1919] P 105, (1919) 1 ILR 43; Lyons 1952
The Charkieh [1894] 1 QB 149, 158
Duff Development Co Ltd v Kelantan [1924] AC 797, 808–9
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 & 5) [2002] 2 AC 883, (2000) 125 ILR 602, [349] (CA)
R (Sultan of Pahang) v Home Secretary [2011] EWCA Civ 616, 152 ILR 543, [14]
Halsbury 2010, [43]
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 & 5) [2002] 2 AC 883, (2000) 125 ILR 602 (CA)
Mighell v Sultan of Johore [1894] 1 QB 149 (CA)
Duff Development Co Ltd v Kelantan [1924] AC 797, (1924) 2 ILR 124 (HL)
Hess v United Kingdom (Eur Comm HR, App No 6231/73, 28 May 1975)
Oppenheim 1992, 190
Hansard, HC, vol 102, Written Answers, col 973, 23 October 1986, (1986) 57 BYIL 512
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853, (1966) 43 ILR 23 (HL) below
R (Alamieyeseigha) v Crown Prosecution Service [2005] EWHC 2704, 145 ILR 619 (DC)
R (Sultan of Pahang) v Home Secretary [2011] EWCA Civ 616, 152 ILR 543
Hansard, HL, vol 394, col 984, 5 July 1978
R (Yollari) v Transport Secretary [2009] EWHC 1918, [2010] EWCA Civ 1093, [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 274, 148 ILR 683, [70]–[81]
R (Sultan of Pahang) v Home Secretary [2011] EWCA Civ 616, 152 ILR 543, [17]
Oppenheim 1992, 1048, n8
Oppenheim 1992, 1048
White, Child & Beney Ltd v Eagle Star and British Dominions Insurance Co (1922) 38 TLR 367, 373
Oppenheim 1992, 1048
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 1) [2000] 1 AC 61, 69, (1998) 119 ILR 50 (HL)
Mighell v Sultan of Johore [1894] 1 QB 149 (CA)
Duff Development Co Ltd v Government of Kelantan [1924] AC 797, (1924) 2 ILR 124 (HL)
Sultan of Johore v Abubakar Tunku Aris Bendahar [1952] AC 318, (1952) 19 ILR 182 (PC)
Sloman v The Governor and Government of New Zealand (1876) 1 CPD 563, 566 (CA)
Winebox Case [1996] 2 NZLR 278, 299, (1996) 104 ILR 526 (CA)
Civil Aeronautics Administration v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2004] SGCA 3, 133 ILR 371
Halsbury 2010, [47]
R (Yollari) v Transport Secretary [2010] EWCA Civ 1093, [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 274, 148 ILR 683, [75]
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16, (1971) 49 ILR 2
UK: Hansard, HL, vol 528, cols 67–9, 22 April 1991, (1991) 62 BYIL 565–6 per Lord Carmyllie; HC, vol 195, cols 413–14, 17 July 1991, (1991) 62 BYIL 567–8 per Lyell S-G
Australia: Hansard, HR, vol 170, 3479–80, 21 December 1989, (1989) 12 AYIL 394–8 per Duffy A-G
Arab Monetary Fund v Hashim (No 3) [1991] 2 AC 114, (1991) 85 ILR 1 (HL)
United States v Insurance Companies 89 US 99 (1874)
Sokoloff v National City Bank of New York 145 NE 917 (1924), 2 ILR 44
Upright v Mercury Business Machines Co Inc 207 NYS 2d 85 (1960), 32 ILR 65
R (Yollari) v Transport Secretary [2010] EWCA Civ 1093, [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 274, 148 ILR 683
Home Secretary v CC [2012] EWHC 2837, [2013] 1 WLR 2171, [130]–[131]
Loucks v Standard Oil Co 224 NY 99, 111, 120 NE 198, 202 (1918)
Oppenheim 1992, [446], [459], [470]
The Mary [1993] QB 54, 67