Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Allocation of Rights
- Part III Patents, Publicity Rights, and Trademarks
- 7 Commentary on Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 8 Commentary on White v. Samsung
- Part IV Condemnation and Adverse Possession
- Part V Gifts and Future Interests
- Part VI Tenancy in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety
- Part VII Exclusionary Zoning
- Part VIII Evictions
- Part IX Landlord–Tenant Premises Liability
- Index
7 - Commentary on Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
from Part III - Patents, Publicity Rights, and Trademarks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2021
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Allocation of Rights
- Part III Patents, Publicity Rights, and Trademarks
- 7 Commentary on Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
- 8 Commentary on White v. Samsung
- Part IV Condemnation and Adverse Possession
- Part V Gifts and Future Interests
- Part VI Tenancy in Common, Joint Tenancy, and Tenancy by the Entirety
- Part VII Exclusionary Zoning
- Part VIII Evictions
- Part IX Landlord–Tenant Premises Liability
- Index
Summary
The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.1 was a landmark case addressing the subject matter provisions in Section 101 of the United States’ Patent Act.2 Represented by public-interest litigators from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Public Patent Foundation, a coalition of scientists, cancer patients, and genetic counselors successfully challenged and invalidated patents covering genetic DNA sequences. The Supreme Court decision drastically revised the understanding of patent-eligible subject matter, with sweeping implications for women’s health, for medical research, and for commercial biotechnology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions , pp. 121 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021