Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- PART ONE Family Law and the Meaning of Divorce
- PART TWO Parenthood in the Enduring Family
- 3 Redefining Parenthood after Separation
- 4 Reasons for the Demise of Sole Custody
- 5 Shared Parenting: The New Frontier
- PART THREE Parents Forever?
- PART FOUR The Family Law System and the Enduring Family
- PART FIVE Financial Transfers in the Enduring Family
- PART SIX The Future of Family Law
- Index
- References
4 - Reasons for the Demise of Sole Custody
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- PART ONE Family Law and the Meaning of Divorce
- PART TWO Parenthood in the Enduring Family
- 3 Redefining Parenthood after Separation
- 4 Reasons for the Demise of Sole Custody
- 5 Shared Parenting: The New Frontier
- PART THREE Parents Forever?
- PART FOUR The Family Law System and the Enduring Family
- PART FIVE Financial Transfers in the Enduring Family
- PART SIX The Future of Family Law
- Index
- References
Summary
How are we to understand the profound change in the language and content of custody laws over the last forty years, and the equally profound changes in patterns of parenting after separation? The legislative changes have been all the more remarkable because they have not gone unchallenged. Yet in the main, the tide of change has flowed inexorably away from traditional conceptualizations of custody and toward an understanding of divorce as a restructuring of the arrangements in a family that continues after separation.
One way of understanding this tide of change is in terms of winners and losers, with every gain for men being a defeat for women in a zero-sum game. This was, for example, how the movement toward joint legal custody was characterized by some in the 1980s. Although there can be little doubt that debates about custody law reform have been strongly influenced by the advocacy of gender-based pressure groups, this advocacy has reflected larger social trends and attitudinal changes. Away from the dust of battle in legislatures and the rhetoric of law reviews and Internet sites, it is evident that there has been a quiet sea change occurring in the hearts and minds of the general population around the western world concerning parenting after separation, including those who are separated or divorced.
CHANGES IN COMMUNITY ATTITUDES TOWARD PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
The extent of change in community attitudes about parenting after separation can be illustrated by reference to studies in Australia that indicate that the concept of shared parenting has very widespread support, including in the divorced population.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Family Law and the Indissolubility of Parenthood , pp. 66 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
, Backlash against Feminism: Canadian Custody and Access Reform Debates of the Late Twentieth Century, 16 Canadian J. Women & L. 255 (2004)Google Scholar
, “Fathers' Rights” and the Defense of Paternal Authority in Australia, 16 Violence against Women328 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Joint Legal Custody: A Reversion to Patriarchal Power, 3 Canadian J. Women & L. 33 (1989)Google Scholar
& , Joint Custody, Feminism and the Dependency Dilemma, 2 Berkeley Women's L.J. 9 (1986)Google Scholar
& , The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws, 39 Soc. Prob. 400 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Who Influences Law Reform? Discourses on Motherhood and Fatherhood in Legislative Reform Debates in Canada, 26 Studies in Law, Politics & Society43 (2002)Google Scholar
, The Family Law Reform Act 1995 (Cth) and the Children Act 1989 (UK) Compared – Twins or Distant Cousins?, 10 Australian J. Fam. L. 18 (1996)Google Scholar
, The Australian Family Law Reform Act 1995 and Public Attitudes to Parental Responsibility, 12 Int'l J.L. Pol'y & Fam. 47 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , & , Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms 113 (2009)
& , The Attitudes of Separated Mothers and Fathers to 50/50 Shared Care, Family Matters no.67, 8 (2004)Google Scholar
, Domestic Violence and the Danger of Joint Custody Presumptions, 25 Nth Illinois L. Rev. 403, 403 (2005)Google Scholar
& , Understanding Distressed Fathers' Perceptions of Legal and Relational Inequities Post-Divorce, 31 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 461 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Law Reform by Frozen Chook: Family Law Reform for the New Millenium?, 24 Melb. U. L. Rev. 737 (2000)Google Scholar
, Towards an Understanding of Family Change: Gender Conflict and Children's Citizenship, 17 Australian J. Fam. L. 20 (2003)Google Scholar
& , The Fathers' Rights Movement: Contradictions in Rhetoric and Practice, 14 J. Fam. Issues592 (1993) (presenting interviews with members of fathers' groups in Canada)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Young Adults' Perspectives on Divorce: Living Arrangements, 38 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 446 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Patterns of Parenting after Divorce: A Pre-Reform Act Benchmark Study, 15 Australian J. Fam. L. 114 (2001)Google Scholar
& , Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Father-Child Contact Arrangements in Australia, 16 Child & Fam. L. Q. 289 (2004)Google Scholar
, Relationships between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father's Role after Separation, 53 J. Marriage & Fam. 79 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , & , The Life Course of Children of Divorce: Marital Disruption and Parental Contact, 48 Am. Soc. Rev. 656 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Children's Perceptions of Their Relationships with Coresiding and Non-Coresiding Fathers, 23 J. Div. & Remarriage39 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Nonresident Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment: The Quality of Nonresident Father-Child Interaction, 24 J. Fam. Issues217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Increasing Our Understanding of Divorced Fathers Who Have Infrequent Contact with Their Children 40 Fam. Rel. 279 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, When Divorced Fathers Want No Contact with Their Children: A Preliminary Analysis, 23 J. Divorce & Remarriage75 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Maternal Gate Closing and Gate Opening in Postdivorce Families, 29 J. Fam. Issues1298 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , The Complexity of Fathers' Parenting Responsibilities and Involvement with Nonresident Children, 24 J. Fam. Issues645 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Postseparation Fathering: What Does Australian Research Tell Us? 10 J. Fam. Stud. 20, 30–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Absent Fathers’ or ‘Reorganized Families’? Variations in Father-child Contact after Parental Break-up in Norway, 54 Sociological Rev. 114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Nonresident Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment: The Quality of Nonresident Father-child Interaction, 24 J. Fam. Issues217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Children's Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives, 52 Fam. Rel. 352 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children, 62 J. Marriage & Fam. 1269 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Children and Divorce: Educational Performance and Behaviour Before and After Parental Separation, 5 Int'l J.L. & Fam. 258 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Support and Advice from Married and Divorced Fathers: Linkages to Adolescent Adjustment, 43 Fam. Rel. 433 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Adolescents after Divorce193, 204 (Fig.10.6) (1996)
, Nonresident Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment: The Quality of Nonresident Father-Child Interaction, 24 J. Fam. Issues217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Paternal Participation and Children's Well-Being after Marital Dissolution, 52 Am. Soc. Rev. 695 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Legal and Educational Interventions for Families in Residence and Contact Disputes, 15 Australian J. Fam. L. 92 (2001)Google Scholar
, Post-Divorce Family Life for Children: An Overview of Research and Some Implications for Policy, inThe Post-Divorce Family: Children, Parenting and Society 3 ( & eds., 1999)Google Scholar
, , & , The Effects of Divorce and Custody Arrangements on Children's Behavior, Development, and Adjustment, 35 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 393 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Enduring Conflict in Parental Separation: Pathways of Impact on Child Development, 9 J. Fam. Stud. 63 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , The Relationship Between Contact and Child Adjustment in High Conflict Cases after Divorce or Separation, 13 Child & Adolescent Mental Health181 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , & , Making Sense of Family Conflict: Intimate Partner Violence and Preschoolers' Externalizing Problems, 24 J. Fam. Psych5 (2010)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , & , Emotional Distress in Children of High-Conflict Divorce. The Impact of Marital Conflict and Violence, 37 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 297 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Listening to Children of Divorce: New Findings that Diverge from Wallerstein, Lewis and Blakeslee, 52 Fam. Rel. 385, 389 (Fig. 3) (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , & , Postdivorce Roles of Mothers and Fathers in the Lives of Their Children, 7 J. Fam. Psych. 33 (1993)Google Scholar
& , When the Difference Is Night and Day: Parent-Child Contact after Separation, 63 Fam. Matters54 (2002)Google Scholar
& , Using Child Development Research to Make Appropriate Custody and Access Decisions for Young Children, 38 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 297 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Blanket Restrictions: Overnight Contact between Parents and Young Children, 38 Fam. & Concil. Cts. Rev. 422 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & , Parenting Plans and Visitation: Critical aspects of Parenting Plans for Young Children: Interjecting Data into the Debate about Overnights. 42 Fam. Ct Rev. 39 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Post-Divorce Visitation for Infants and Young Children – the Myths and the Psychological Unknowns, 36 Fam. L. Q. 195 (2002)Google Scholar
, Talking about Children's Rights in Judicial Custody and Visitation Decision-Making, 36 Fam. L. Q. 105 (2002)Google Scholar
, , & , Children's Involvement in Custody and Access Arrangements after Parental Separation, 12 Child & Fam. L.Q. 383 (2000)Google Scholar
, Child Inclusive Divorce Mediation: Report on a Qualitative Research Study, 18 Med. Q. 55 (2000)Google Scholar
, , , , & , Children's Involvement in Their Parents' Divorce: Implications for Practice, 16 Children & Society89 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Fine Art of Listening: Children's Voices in Custody Proceedings, 4 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 131 (2002)Google Scholar
, , & , Rethinking Children's Involvement in Decision-Making after Parental Separation, 10 Childhood201 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Identifying Underlying Dimensions in Spouses' Evaluations of Fairness in the Division of Household Labor, 27 Social Science Research305 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Men and Women's Power Relationships and the Persisting Inequitable Division of Housework, 6 J. Fam. Studies7 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & , Life Course Transitions and Housework: Marriage, Parenthood, and Time on Housework, 70 J. Marriage & Family259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Pluralism, Parental Preferences, and Child Custody, 80 Cal. L. Rev. 615 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Preference, Presumption, Predisposition, and Common Sense: From Traditional Custody Doctrines to the American Law Institute's Family Dissolution Project, 36 Fam. L. Q. 11 (2002)Google Scholar
, The Primary Caretaker Parent Rule: Child Custody and the Dynamics of Greed, 3 Yale L. & Pol. Rev. 168 (1984)Google Scholar
, The Primary Caretaker Presumption: Canadian Perspectives on an American Development, 4 Int. J. L. Pol'y & Fam. 186 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Discretion, Rules and Law: Child Custody and the UMDA's Best Interest Standard, 89 Mich. L. Rev. 2215, 2283–87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decisionmaking, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 727 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Selective Recognition of Gender Difference in the Law: Revaluing the Caretaker Role, 31 Harv. J L. & Gender1 (2008)Google Scholar
in The Inapplicability of Rights Analysis in Post-Divorce Child Custody Decision-Making 30 Alberta L. Rev. 852, at 893–95 (1992)Google Scholar
, Australian Legislation on Parenting Orders: A Case for the Principles of Care and Diversity and Presumptions Based on Them, 24 J. Soc. Welfare & Fam. L. 401 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Potentialities and Perils of the Primary Caregiver Presumption, 7 Can. Fam. L. Q. 1, at 24–28 (1990)Google Scholar
, , & , The Politics of the Primary Caregiver Presumption 13 Australian J. Fam. L. 233 (1999)Google Scholar
, The Past Caretaking Standard in Comparative Perspective, in (ed), Reconceiving the Family: Critical Reflections on the American Law Institute's Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution446 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, No-Fault Divorce and Child Custody: Chilling Out the Gender Wars, 36 Fam. L. Q. 27, 40 (2002)Google Scholar
, How the ALI Child Custody Principles Help Eliminate Gender and Sexual Orientation Bias from Child Custody Determinations, 8 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y301 (2001)Google Scholar
, , , , & , Divorcing Children: Children's experience of Their Parents' Divorce 39 (2003)
, Punching the Parental Time Clock: The Approximation Rule, Social Science and the Baseball Bat Kids, 45 Fam. Ct Rev. 600, 606 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, American Law Institute's Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution, Eight Years after Adoption: Guiding Principle or Obligatory Footnote?, 42 Fam. L.Q. 573 (2008)Google Scholar