Book contents
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech Under the Principate
- Chapter 2 ‘Shall I Compare Thee … ?’ Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy
- Chapter 3 Towards an Account of the Ancient World’s Concepts of Fictive Belief
- Chapter 4 Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets
- Chapter 5 Criticism Ancient and Modern
- Chapter 6 The Odiousness of Comparisons: Horace on Literary History and the Limitations of synkrisis
- Chapter 7 Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus
- Chapter 8 Two Virgilian Acrostics: certissima signa?
- Chapter 9 Catullus and the Roman Paradox Epigram
- Chapter 10 Becoming an Authority: Horace on his Own Reception
- Chapter 11 Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace
- Chapter 12 Doing the Numbers: The Roman Mathematics of Civil War in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
- Chapter 13 Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus
- Chapter 14 Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts
- Chapter 15 Representation and the Materiality of the Book in Catullus’ Polymetrics
- Chapter 16 Catullus 61: Epithalamium and Comparison
- Chapter 17 Ovid’s Ciceronian Literary History: End-Career Chronology and Autobiography
- Chapter 18 Horace and the Literature of the Past: Lyric, Epic, and History in Odes 4
- Chapter 19 Forma manet facti (Ov. Fast. 2.379): Aetiologies of Myth and Ritual in Ovid’s Fasti and Metamorphoses
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2021
Introduction by
Book contents
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech Under the Principate
- Chapter 2 ‘Shall I Compare Thee … ?’ Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy
- Chapter 3 Towards an Account of the Ancient World’s Concepts of Fictive Belief
- Chapter 4 Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets
- Chapter 5 Criticism Ancient and Modern
- Chapter 6 The Odiousness of Comparisons: Horace on Literary History and the Limitations of synkrisis
- Chapter 7 Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus
- Chapter 8 Two Virgilian Acrostics: certissima signa?
- Chapter 9 Catullus and the Roman Paradox Epigram
- Chapter 10 Becoming an Authority: Horace on his Own Reception
- Chapter 11 Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace
- Chapter 12 Doing the Numbers: The Roman Mathematics of Civil War in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
- Chapter 13 Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus
- Chapter 14 Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts
- Chapter 15 Representation and the Materiality of the Book in Catullus’ Polymetrics
- Chapter 16 Catullus 61: Epithalamium and Comparison
- Chapter 17 Ovid’s Ciceronian Literary History: End-Career Chronology and Autobiography
- Chapter 18 Horace and the Literature of the Past: Lyric, Epic, and History in Odes 4
- Chapter 19 Forma manet facti (Ov. Fast. 2.379): Aetiologies of Myth and Ritual in Ovid’s Fasti and Metamorphoses
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 396 - 430Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adams, J.N. . 1999a. ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and centurionate’, JRS 89: 109–34Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. . 1999b. ‘Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry’, in Adams, J.N. and Mayer, R.G. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford. 97–133Google Scholar
Adelman, J. 1973. The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von. 1981. ‘Mythos und römische Realität in Ovids “Metamorphosen”’, ANRW 2.31.4: 2328–42Google Scholar
Altick, R.D. 1991. The Presence of the Present: Topics of the Day in the Victorian Novel. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Alton, E.H., Wormell, D.E.W. and Courtney, E. 1978/1985. P. Ovidi Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Anders, H.R.D. 1904. Shakespeare’s Books: A Dissertation on Shakespeare’s Reading and the Immediate Sources of his Works. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.D., Parsons, P.J. and Nisbet, R.J.M. 1978. ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm’, JRS 68: 125–55Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto, Buffalo, NY and LondonGoogle Scholar
Andreau, J. 1968. ‘Banque grecque et banque romaine dans le théâtre de Plaute et de Térence’, MEFRA 80: 461–526Google Scholar
Aresi, L. 2017. Nel giardino di Pomona. Le Metamorfosi di Ovidio e l’invenzione di una mitologia in terra d’Italia. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1993. ‘The addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean protreptic’, MD 31: 185–230Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. . 2004. ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De Morte’, in Fitzgerald, J.T., Obbink, D. and Holland, G.S. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden. 15–54Google Scholar
Ax, W. 1993. ‘Phaselus ille-Sabinus ille—Ein Beitrag zur neueren Diskussion um die Beziehung zwischen Texten’, in Ax, W. and Glei, R.F. (eds.), Literaturparodie in Antike und Mittelalter. Trier. 75–100Google Scholar
Badian, E. . 1972. ‘Ennius and his friends’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 17. Geneva. 149–208Google Scholar
Baldwin, T.W. 1944. William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Bang, P.F. 2008. The Roman Bazaar: A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2012. ‘Pliny’s epistolary dreams and the ghost of Domitian’, TAPhA 142: 105–32Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993a. ‘Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2,1 e Ovidio, Tristia II’, MD 31: 149–84Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1993b. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95: 333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1996. ‘Poetry, praise and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’, ClAnt 15: 5–47Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Translation of Barchiesi (1994)Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2000. ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 167–82Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001a. ‘Some points on a map of shipwrecks’, in Fox, M. and Marchesi, S. (trs. and eds.), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London. 141–54Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001b. ‘Horace and iambos: the poet as literary historian’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 141–64Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002a. ‘The uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and its tradition’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 107–23Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002b. ‘Martial arts. Mars Ultor in the Forum Augustum. A verbal monument with a vengeance’, in Herbert-Brown, G. (ed.), Ovid’s Fasti: Historical Readings at its Bimillennium. Oxford. 1–22Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005. ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 320–42Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2008. ‘Senatus consultum de Lycaone: Concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 61: 117–45Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. 1962. Nevio epico: Storia, interpretazione, edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. . 2001. ‘What did Shakespeare read?’, in de Grazia, M. and Wells, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare. Cambridge. 31–47Google Scholar
Barlow, C.T. 1978. Bankers, Moneylenders, and Interest Rates in the Roman Republic. Diss., University of North Carolina-Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T.D. 1998. ‘Tacitus and the Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre’, Phoenix 52: 125–48Google Scholar
Barsby, J. 1995. ‘Plautus’ Pseudolus as improvisatory drama’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 55–70Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. . 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Batstone, W.W. . 1998. ‘Dry pumice and the programmatic language of Catullus 1’, CPh 93: 125–35Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1987. ‘A complex of times: no more sheep on Romulus’ birthday’, PCPhS 33: 1–15Google Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.). 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60. Geburtstag. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul, tr. J. van Sickle. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. . 2000. Le orecchie di Hermes: studi di antropologia e letterature classiche. TurinGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. . 2005. ‘The politics and poetics of geography in the Milan Posidippus, Section One: on stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 119–40Google Scholar
Bishop, J.D. 1971. ‘Catullus 85: structure, hellenistic parallels and the topos’, Latomus 30: 633–42Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1983. ‘Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics, and the ancient theory of punctuation’, Glotta 61: 48–67Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. 1999. ‘The empty tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past’, ClAnt 18: 187–226Google Scholar
Bollème, G. (ed.). 1963. Extraits de le correspondance, ou, Préface à la vie d’écrivain: Gustave Flaubert. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bömer, F. . 1988. ‘Über das zeitliche Verhältnis zwischen den Fasten und den Metamorphosen Ovids’, Gymnasium 95: 207–21Google Scholar
Bonime, F. and Eckardt, M.H. 1993. ‘On psychoanalysing literary characters’, in Berman, E. (ed.), Essential Papers on Literature and Psychoanalysis. New York and London. 202–16Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. LondonGoogle Scholar
Booth, W.C. 1979. ‘Metaphor as rhetoric: the problem of evaluation’, in Sacks (1979). 47–80Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. . 2011. ‘Alcman’s first Partheneion and the song the Sirens sang’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin. 33–65Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. and Thomas, J.D. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). LondonGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. . 2006. ‘A tale of two cities: Statius, Thebes, and Rome’, Phoenix 60: 259–73Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. 1962. ‘Horace and Varro’, in Brink, C.O. (ed.), Varron, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 9. Geneva. 175–206Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. . 1982. Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brodersen, K. (ed.) and Veh, O. (tr.). 1987. Appian von Alexandria. Römische Geschichte, vol. 1. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.D. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura 4.1030–1287. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.). 2018. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, R. 1990. ‘The psychoanalytic interpretation of Greek myth’, in Edmunds, L. (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth. Baltimore, MD. 344–89Google Scholar
Campbell, D.A. . 1992. Greek Lyric IV: Bacchylides, Corinna, and Others. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Carey, C. 1999. ‘Ethos and Pathos in Bacchylides’, in Pfeijffer, I.L. and Slings, S.R. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Bacchylides. Amsterdam. 17–29Google Scholar
Castle, T. 1986. Masquerade and Civilization: The Carnivalesque in Eighteenth-Century English Culture and Fiction. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Castner, C.J. 1988. Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1983. Libri scritture scribi a Ercolano: Introduzione allo studio dei materiali greci. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, G. . 1999. ‘Between Volumen and Codex’, in Cavallo, G. and Chartier, R. (eds.), A History of Reading in the West, tr. L. G. Cochrane. Amherst, MA. 64–89Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.). 2001. Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. 1984. Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction. Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forme della comunicazione letteraria. RomeGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. . 2005. ‘Orazio, Cicerone, e il tempo della letteratura’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 123–39Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2000. Amicizia e potere: nelle lettere di Cicerone e nelle elegie ovidiane dall’esilio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Citti, F. 1994. Orazio. L’invito a Torquato, Epist. 1,5. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento. BariGoogle Scholar
Colaclides, P. 1981. ‘Odi et amo: une lecture linguistique du c.LXXXV de Catulle’, in Kresic, S. (ed.), Contemporary Literary Hermeneutics and Interpretation of Classical Texts. Ottawa: 227–33Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2004. ‘Monkey business: imitation, authenticity, and identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, ClAnt 23: 179–207Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trs. varii, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, tr. G.W. Most. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). LondonGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. 1985. ‘Three poems of Catullus: (1) Poem 62 and its Greek background’, BICS 32: 85–8Google Scholar
Courtney, E. . 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
Crews, F. . 1995. The Memory Wars: Freud’s Legacy in Dispute. Frederick Crews and his Critics. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. 1980. ‘Prolegomena to a theory of reading’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 46–66Google Scholar
Dalby, A. 1998. ‘Homer’s enemies: lyric and epic in the seventh century’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New Evidence. London. 195–211Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.I. 1982. ‘Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?’, Ethology and Sociobiology 3: 69–78Google Scholar
Daube, D. 1951. ‘Ne quid infamandi causa fiat: the Roman law of defamation’, in Atti del congresso internazionale di diritto romano e di storia del diritto, 1948. Milan: III.411–50Google Scholar
Davis, G. 1991. Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Delcourt, A. 2001. ‘Évandre à Rome. Réflexions autour de quatre interprétations de la légende’, Latomus 60: 829–63Google Scholar
Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Di Brazzano, S. 1999. ‘Cacata charta: nota a Catull. 36, 1, e a Priap. 69, 4’, MD 43: 179–89Google Scholar
Dornseiff-Greifswald, F. 1936. ‘Ägyptische Liebeslieder, Hoheslied, Sappho, Theokrit’, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90: 589–601Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, K. and van Dorsten, J. (eds.). 1973. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dupont, F. 1976. ‘Signification théâtrale du double dans l’Amphitryon de Plaute’, REL 54: 129–41Google Scholar
Dupont, F. . 1997. ‘Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Princeton, NJ. 44–59Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I.M.LeM. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: the propaganda value of Sermones I’, in Woodman and West (1984). 19–58Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. ‘Callimachus Iamb 4: from performance to writing’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 77–98Google Scholar
Edwards, M.J. 1992. ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Leroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI. Brussels. 181–203Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1978. ‘Die Destruktion der Tradition: Theokrits mythologische Gedichte’, RhM 121: 48–77Google Scholar
Ehlers, W.-W. 1990. ‘Zur Rezitation der Satiren des Persius’, in Kullmann, W. (ed.), Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur. Tübingen. 171–81Google Scholar
Fain, G.L. 2008. Writing Epigrams: The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. 1983. ‘Sexual comedy in Ovid’s Fasti: sources and motivations’, HSPh 87: 185–216Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1985. ‘Ovid, Germanicus and the composition of the Fasti’, PLLS 5: 243–81Google Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 1996. Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Fantham, R.E. . 2010. ‘Discordia fratrum: aspects of Lucan’s conception of civil war’, in Breed, B., Damon, D. and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars. Oxford. 207–19Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2001. Latin Language and Latin Literature: From Ancient to Modern Times. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2009. ‘The impermanent text in Catullus and other Roman poets’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 164–85Google Scholar
Fauth, W. 1978. ‘Römische Religion im Spiegel der Fasti des Ovid’, ANRW 2.16.1: 104–86Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2002. ‘Metamorphosis in the Metamorphoses’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 163–79Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2007. ‘The intellectual climate’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA. 92–110Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2011. Playing Gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Felman, S. 1982. ‘Turning the screw of interpretation’, in Felman, S. (ed.), Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of Reading: Otherwise. Baltimore, MD. 94–207Google Scholar
Felperin, H. 1990. The Uses of the Canon: Elizabethan Literature and Contemporary Theory. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2010. Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and her Community, trs. B. Acosta-Hughes and L. Prauscello. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. . 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Flexner, A. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge, with a Companion Essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Foley, H.P. . 1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, NY and LondonGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. . 1995. ‘Horace and the aesthetics of politics’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 248–66Google Scholar
Fowler, P. 1997. ‘Lucretian conclusions’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. 112–38Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. 1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2004. ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R.L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 220–32Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. . 2006. ‘How to tell a myth: genealogy, mythology, mythography’, Kernos 19 [online]Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2019. ‘The prehistory of the Roman polis in Dionysius’, in Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. (eds.), Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Cambridge. 180–200Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S.A. 1997. Handlung und Nebenhandlung: Theater, Metatheater und Gattungsbewusstsein in der römischen Komödie. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. 1914. ‘A rejected poem and a substitute: Catullus LXVIII A and B’, AJPh 35: 67–73Google Scholar
Frassinetti, P. 1975. Gli Annali di Ennio: inquadramento e versione dei frammenti. GenoaGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. . 2002. ‘Writing to/through Florus: criticism and the addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2’, Amer. Acad. Rome 47: 33–55Google Scholar
Führer, R. 1967. Formproblem-Untersuchungen zu den Reden in der frühgriechischen Lyrik. MunichGoogle Scholar
Fuller, C.J. 1992. The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gaar, E. and Schuster, M. 1930. Auswahl aus römischen Dichtern zur Ergänzung der Vergil- und Horazlektüre. ViennaGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. 1975. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. 2006. ‘The rise of fictionality’, in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel. Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture. Princeton, NJ. 336–63Google Scholar
Garner, R. 1990. From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1992. The Architext: An Introduction, tr. J.E. Lewin. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, tr. A.T. Cole. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1968. ‘Sympotic literature and epigram’, in Raubitschek, A.E. (ed.), L’Epigramme grecque, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 14. Geneva. 93–177Google Scholar
Gibson, R.K. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2004. ‘Ovid’s Hecale: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses’, JRS 94: 47–72Google Scholar
Gold, B.K. 1992. ‘Openings in Horace’s Satires and Odes; poet, patron, and audience’, YClS 29: 161–85Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. . 1995b. ‘Improvisation, plot, and Plautus’ Curculio’, in Benz, Stärk and Vogt-Spira (1995). 33–42.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994a. ‘The failure of exemplarity’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 51–73Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. . 1994b. ‘The naïve and knowing eye: ecphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge. 197–223Google Scholar
Gordon, J.S. and Gordon, A.E. 1957. Contribution to the Study of Latin Inscriptions. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. . 2009. ‘The ends of the beginning: Horace, Satires I’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 39–60.Google Scholar
Gowing, A.M. . 2013. ‘Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the imperial period’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge. 233–50Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1988. ‘Ovide, les Métamorphoses et la véracité du mythe’, in Calame, C. (ed.), Métamorphoses du mythe en Grèce antique. Geneva. 57–70Google Scholar
Graf, F. . 1992. ‘Römische Aitia und ihre Riten. Das Beispiel von Saturnalia und Parilia’. MH 49: 13–25Google Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. 1924. ‘Cicero’s Orator and Horace’s Ars Poetica’, HSPh 35: 1–74Google Scholar
Grant, M.A. and Fiske, G.C. . 1929. Cicero’s De Oratore and Horace’s Ars Poetica. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009. ‘Horace, Suetonius, and the Lives of the Greek poets’, in Houghton and Wyke (2009). 140–60Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2009. ‘Greek lyric and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge. 95–113Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1984. ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 189–218Google Scholar
Griffith, J.G. 1983. ‘Catullus, Poem 4: a neglected interpretation revived’, Phoenix 37: 123–8Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. 1972. ‘Alcman’s Partheneion: the morning after the night before’, QUCC 14: 7–30Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. . 1993. Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CTGoogle Scholar
Günther, L.-M. 1989. ‘Hannibal im Exil’, in Devijver, H. and Lipinski, E. (eds.), Studia Phoenica X: The Punic Wars. Leiden. 241–50Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2002. ‘Art’s echo: the tradition of Hellenistic ecphrastic epigram’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. (eds.), Hellenistic Epigrams. Leiden. 85–112Google Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. . 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hague, R. 1983. ‘Ancient Greek wedding songs: the tradition of praise’, Journal of Folklore Research 20: 131–43Google Scholar
Hall, E. 2008. ‘Is the “Barcelona Alcestis” a Latin pantomime libretto?’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford. 258–82Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. 1993. ‘Plautine ingredients in the performance of the Pseudolus’, CW 87: 21–6Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. . 1992. ‘Pleasure, understanding, and emotion in Aristotle’s Poetics’, in Rorty, A.O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton, NJ. 241–60Google Scholar
Halperin, D.M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Sexuality, and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D.B. 1990. Virgil and “The Tempest”: The Politics of Imitation. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993a. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993b. ‘Vt pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’, in Rudd (1993). 120–39Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2002a. ‘Another look at Virgil’s Ganymede’, in Wiseman, T.P. (ed.), Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. London. 333–61Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Harries, B. 1989. ‘Causation and the authority of the poet in Ovid’s Fasti’, CQ 39: 164–85Google Scholar
Harrison, B. 1991. Inconvenient Fictions: Literature and the Limits of Theory. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. 1990. ‘The praise singer: Horace, Censorinus and Odes 4.8’, JRS 80: 31–43Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 2008. ‘Horace Epistles 2: the last Horatian book of Sermones?’, PLLS 13: 173–86Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. and Heyworth, S.J. 1998. ‘Notes on the text and interpretation of Catullus’, PCPhS 44: 85–109Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1960. Vom Geist des Römertums: Ausgewählte Aufsätze3, ed. Burck, E.. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Helzle, M. 1989. Publii Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber IV: A Commentary on Poems 1 to 7 and 16. Zürich and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991. ‘Persius’ didactic satire: the pupil as teacher’, Ramus 20: 123–48Google Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. . 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. 2005. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ Achilleid. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Heslin, P. . 2011. ‘Metapoetic pseudonyms in Horace, Propertius and Ovid’, JRS 101: 51–72Google Scholar
Heyworth, S.J. . 2001. ‘Catullian Iambics, Catullian Iambi’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001). 117–40Google Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. The Classical Tradition: Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987a. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1992. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti—Part I: Genre and Mannerism; Part II: Genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan Ideology’, Arethusa 25: 81–153Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2006. ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: towards the limits of etymologizing interpretation’, Dictynna 3: 173–208Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2010. ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford. 369–85Google Scholar
Holoka, J.P. 1985. Gaius Valerius Catullus: A Systematic Bibliography. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2000. ‘Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: “Womanufacture” in Catullus’, PCPhS 46: 28–44Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. . 1991. ‘From violence to blessing: symbols and rituals in ancient Rome’, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J. (eds.), City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor, MI. 479–98Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1989. Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, S. 2004. Das Epithalamium in der lateinischen Literatur der Spätantike. MunichGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. 2013. ‘From Ecloga the Mime to Vergil’s Eclogues as Mimes: Ein Gedankenspiel’, Vergilius 59: 37–60Google Scholar
Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.). 2009. Perceptions of Horace: A Poet and his Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Housman, A.E. 1972. The Classical Papers of A.E. Housman, eds. Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F.R.D.. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Houston, G.W. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. . 1995. ‘Pindarici fontis qui non expalluit haustus: Horace, Epistles I.3’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 219–27Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1984. ‘Catullus 68: the text as self-demystification’, Arethusa 17: 29–49Google Scholar
Hunter, G.K. 1977. ‘A Roman thought: Renaissance attitudes to history exemplified in Shakespeare and Jonson’, in Lee, B.S. (ed.), An English Miscellany: Presented to W.S. Mackie. Cape Town, London and New York. 93–118Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1985. ‘Horace on friendship and free speech: Epistles 1.18 and Satires 1.4’, Hermes 113: 480–90Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 1992. ‘Writing the god: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’, MD 29: 9–34Google Scholar
Hunter, R. . 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.). 2017. Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2010. ‘Deflected addresses: apostrophe and space (Sophocles, Aeschines, Plautus, Cicero, Virgil and others)’, CQ 60: 96–109Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2012. ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge. 48–78Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. . 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks & Contexts for Intertextuality. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. 2006. ‘Commentario al Libro X’, in Quinto Ennio, Annali (Libri IX-XVIII): Commentari. Naples. 141–282Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: metus hostilis and the fall of Rome in the Punica’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 123–39Google Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. ‘When the Lamp is Shattered’: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and Edwardsville, ILGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, T.E. 2005. ‘At play with writing: letters and readers in Plautus’, TAPhA 135: 359–92Google Scholar
Jenott, L. 2010. The Gospel of Judas: Coptic Text, Translation, and Historical Interpretation of the ‘Betrayer’s Gospel’. Diss. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T.S. 2004. A Symposion of Praise: Horace Returns to Lyric in Odes IV. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.A. 2009. ‘The ancient book’, in Bagnall, R.S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford. 256–81Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. and Parker, H.N. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. 1982. The Idea of Lyric: Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. . 1993. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Jong, I.J.F. de and Sullivan, J.P. (eds.). 1994. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. (eds.). forthcoming. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S.T. 1982. ‘The shackles of forgetfulness: Horace, C., 4, 7’, Latomus 41: 815–16Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. 1987. Review of H.-P. Stahl, Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’ (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1985), LCM 12: 72–7Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1992. ‘“Augustan” and “anti-Augustan”: reflections on terms of reference’, in A. Powell (1992). 26–58Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. . 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. . 1989b. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. 1: Classical Criticism. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, A. 1868. ‘Zur Kritik und Erklärung des Plautinischen Pseudolus’, RhM 23: 411–26Google Scholar
Kloft, H. 1984. ‘Aspekte der Prinzipatsideologie im frühen Prinzipat’, Gymnasium 91: 306–26Google Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Knox, P.E. and Foss, C. (eds.). 1998. Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Kolendo, J. 1981. ‘La répartition des places aux spectacles et la stratification sociale dans l’Empire Romain: à propos des inscriptions sur les gradins des amphithéâtres et théâtres’, Ktèma 6: 301–15Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.). 2013. Ancient Libraries. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kramer, L.S. 1989. ‘Literature, criticism, and historical imagination: the literary challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra’, in Hunt, L. (ed.), The New Cultural History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 97–128Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1998. ‘Repetition and empire in the Ab Urbe Condita’, in Knox and Foss (1998). 264–83Google Scholar
Krostenko, B.A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre3, rev. A. Thierfelder. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Kurfess, A. 1938. ‘Hat Linkomies’ Auffassung der vierten Ekloge wirklich dem Räselraten eine Ende bereitet?’, PhW 58: 812–16Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1999. Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, A. 2005. ‘Cabinet fit for a queen: the λιθικά as Posidippus’ gem museum’, in Gutzwiller (2005). 141–63Google Scholar
La Penna, A. . 1972. ‘Sunt qui Sappho malint. Note sulla σύγκρισις di Saffo e Alceo nell’antichità’, Maia 24: 208–15Google Scholar
Labate, M. . 1984. L’arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell’ elegia ovidiana. PisaGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. . 2005. ‘Poetica minore e minima: Mecenate e gli amici nelle Satire di Orazio’, MD 54: 47–63Google Scholar
Lada, I. 1993. ‘“Empathic understanding”: emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPhS 39: 94–140Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1997. ‘Plutarch and the Romanizations of Athens’, in Hoff, M.C. and Rotroff, S.I. (eds.), The Romanizations of Athens. Oxford. 151–60Google Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 2015. ‘Herders’ graffiti’, in Matthaiou, A.P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), AXON: Studies in Honor of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens. 49–58Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2008. ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: the case of seueritas’, CCJ 54: 160–87Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. 2001. ‘Keening Sappho: female speech genres in Sappho’s poetry’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton, NJ. 75–92Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1990. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft3. MunichGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E.T. and McCauley, R.N. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, J.F. 1978. Hannibal’s War: A Military History of the Second Punic War. WarminsterGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1977. ‘Plautus-Studien I, der doppelte Geldkreislauf im Pseudolus’, Hermes 105: 441–54Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1988. ‘Die grosse Florus-Epistel des Horaz (2.2). Der Schwanengesang der augusteischen Dichtung’, in Binder, G. (ed.), Saeculum Augustum II. Darmstadt. 342–59Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1901. Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. A History of Greek Literature, trs. J. Willis and C. de Heer. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1958. ‘L’ordinamento ed i reciproci rapporti dei carmi maggiori di Catullo’, RFIC 86: 23–47Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. . 1962. Puella divina. Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull im Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, C. 2002. ‘Integer ipse? Self-knowledge and self-presentation in Persius Satires 4’, Phoenix 56: 56–83Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. 1975. ‘Ovid’s Lupercalia (Fasti 2.267–452): a study in the artistry of the Fasti’, Latomus 34: 1060–72Google Scholar
Littlewood, R.J. . 1981. ‘Poetic artistry and dynastic politics: Ovid at the Ludi Megalenses (Fasti 4.179–372)’, CQ 31: 381–95Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (ed.). 2003. Credito e moneta nel mondo romano. Atti degli Incontri capresi di storia dell’economia antica (Capri 12–14 ottobre 2000). BariGoogle Scholar
Loehr, J. 1996. Ovids Mehrfacherklärungen in der Tradition aitiologischen Dichtens. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Logan, G.M. 1976. ‘Lucan—Daniel—Shakespeare: new light on the relation between The Civil Wars and Richard II’, Shakespeare Studies 9: 121–40Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. 2007. ‘Catullus and Martial’, in Skinner, M.B (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton. 418–38Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2010. ‘Cannibalising history: Livian moments in Statius’ Thebaid’, in Miller and Woodman (2010). 71–86Google Scholar
Lowe, J.C.B. 1962. ‘The manuscript evidence for changes of speaker in Aristophanes’, BICS 9: 27–42Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2002. ‘Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the poet statesman at Epistles 2.1.256’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 158–71Google Scholar
Luce, T.J. 1990. ‘Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum’, in Raaflaub, K.A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 123–38Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. 1990. ‘The origin and development of the Catullan style in Neo-Latin poetry’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O. (eds.), Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Oxford. 183–97Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2001. ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford. 138–60Google Scholar
Lyghounis, M.G. 1991. ‘Elementi tradizionali nella poesia nuziale greca’, MD 27: 159–98Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
MacCabe, C. 1988. ‘Language, linguistics and the study of literature’, in Lodge, D. (ed.), Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. London and New York. 432–44Google Scholar
McCall, M.H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, M.W. 1910. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and their Background. London and MelbourneGoogle Scholar
McDermott, E.A. 1981. ‘Greek and Roman elements in Horace’s lyric program’, ANRW 2.31.3: 1640–72Google Scholar
Macintyre, A. 1970. ‘The idea of a social science’, in Wilson, B.R. (ed.), Rationality. Oxford. 112–30Google Scholar
McKeown, J.C. 1984. ‘Fabula proposito nulla tegenda meo: Ovid’s Fasti and Augustan politics’, in Woodman and West (1984). 169–87Google Scholar
Maine, H.S. 1861. Ancient Law, in Connection with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mangelsdorff, E.A. 1913. Das lyrische Hochzeitsgedicht bei den Griechen und Römern. HamburgGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993a. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. . 1993b. ‘Descent into hell: reading ambiguity, or Virgil and the critics’, PVS 21: 111–50Google Scholar
Martindale, C. . 2004. ‘Shakespeare and Virgil’, in Martindale, C. and Taylor, A.B. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Classics. Cambridge. 89–106Google Scholar
Martindale, C. and Martindale, M. 1990. Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
May, J.M. 1990. ‘The monologistic dialog as a method of literary criticism’, Athenaeum 78: 177–80Google Scholar
Mayer, R. . 1995a. ‘Graecia capta: the Roman reception of Greek literature’, PLLS 8: 289–307Google Scholar
Meltzer, F. 1990. ‘Unconscious’, in Lentricchia, F. and McLaughlin, T. (eds.), Critical Terms for Literary Study. Chicago, IL. 147–63Google Scholar
Merli, E. 2000. Arma canant alii: Materia epica e narrazione elegiaca nei fasti di Ovidio. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Meyer, E.A. 2001. ‘Wooden wit: tabellae in Latin poetry’, in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-Five Years at Yale. New Haven, CT. 201–12Google Scholar
Meyer, E.A. . 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, A.N. 1999. ‘Etymologising on common nouns in Catullus’, Emerita 67: 127–45Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. . 1992. ‘The Fasti and Hellenistic didactic: Ovid’s variant aetiologies’, Arethusa 25: 11–31Google Scholar
Miller, J.F. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.). 2010. Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Moeller, P. 1912. Deos consiliantes qua ratione Lucilius in libro primo aliique effinxerint. Diss. WeimarGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. . 2002a. ‘Poetry, philosophy, politics and play: Epistles I’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 141–57Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1942. Review of L. Robinson, Freedom of Speech in the Roman Republic (Baltimore, MD, 1940), JRS 32: 120–4Google Scholar
Morgan, J.R. 1993. ‘Make-believe and make believe: the fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter. 175–229Google Scholar
Muecke, F. . 1995. ‘Law, rhetoric, and genre in Horace, Satires 2.1’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 203–18Google Scholar
Müller, R.W. 1964. Rhetorische und syntaktische Interpunktion. Untersuchungen zur Pausenbezeichnung im antiken Latein. Diss. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Myers, K.S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Nagle, B.R. 1980. The Poetics of Exile: Program and Polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto of Ovid. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R.R. 1994. ‘Historicizing reading: the aesthetics of reception and Horace’s “Soracte Ode”’, in de Jong and Sullivan (1994). 207–30Google Scholar
Newlands, C. . 2002. ‘Mandati Memores: political and poetic authority in the Fasti’, in P. Hardie (2002c). 200–16Google Scholar
Newman, J.K. . 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1987. ‘Pyrrha among roses: real life and poetic imagination in Augustan Rome’, review of Griffin (1985), JRS 77: 184–90Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 1995. Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.J.. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2002. ‘A wine-jar for Messalla: Carmina 3.21’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 80–92Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.G.M. . 2007. ‘Horace: life and chronology’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge. 7–21Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S.P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X. Volume II: Books VII and VIII. OxfordGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1996. ‘Vergil’s best reader? Ovidian commentary on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 91: 255–76Google Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. . 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1991. ‘Canidia, Canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s Epodes’, Arethusa 24: 107–38Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. . 1995. ‘Life after publication: Horace, Epistles 1.20’, Arethusa 28: 209–24Google Scholar
Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. Abingdon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Önnerfors, A. 1974. Vaterporträts in der römischen Poesie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Horaz, Statius und Ausonius. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Page, D. 1955. Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. 2007. ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus’ wedding poems’, in Skinner, M.B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Oxford. 276–92Google Scholar
Paoli, U.E. 1932. ‘Note di filologia reale su Catullo, Orazio, Marziale’, SIFC 10: 33–7Google Scholar
Paratore, E. 1963. ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti fra Catullo e gli epigrammisti dell’ «Antologia»’, in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni. Turin: 562–87Google Scholar
Parker, H.N. 2009. ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in W.A. Johnson and Parker (2009). 186–229Google Scholar
Parkes, M.B. 1993. Pause and Effect: Punctuation in the West. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Parsons, P.J., Nisbet, R.G.M. and Hutchinson, G.O. 1983. ‘Alcestis in Barcelona’, ZPE 52: 31–6Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. 2006. Founding the Year: Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of the Roman Calendar. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2018. ‘Fidelity and farewell: Pindar’s ethics as textual events’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018). 257–74Google Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1986. ‘Qui potis est, inquis? Audience roles in Catullus’, Arethusa 19: 187–209Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R . 2009. ‘Seeing a Roman tragedy through Greek eyes: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar’, in Hall, E. and Goldhill, S. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Tragic Tradition. Cambridge. 264–88Google Scholar
Petrain, D. 2005. ‘Gems, metapoetics, and value: Greek and Roman responses to a third-century discourse on precious stones’, TAPhA 135: 329–57Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pfeijffer, I.L. 2004. ‘Pindar and Bacchylides’, in de Jong, I.J.F., Nunlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden. 213–32Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2006. ‘Making an impression: replication and the ontology of the Graeco-Roman seal stone’, Art History 29: 233–57Google Scholar
Poovey, M. 2008. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Possanza, D.M. 2004. Translating the Heavens: Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. . 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Price, S.R.F. . 1990. ‘The future of dreams: from Freud to Artemidoros’, in Halperin, D.M., Winkler, J.J. and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds.), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton, NJ. 365–87Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1995. ‘On the sacking of Carthage and Corinth’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford. 133–48Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 2006. ‘Horace to Torquatus: Epistle 1.5 and Ode 4.7’, AJPh 127: 387–413Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. . 2006. ‘The tragedy of nobility on the seventeenth-century stage’, Modern Language Quarterly 67: 7–29Google Scholar
Rafti, P. 1988. ‘L’interpunzione nel libro manoscritto: mezzo secolo di studi’, S&C 12: 239–98Google Scholar
Rawson, E. . 1991. ‘Discrimina ordinum: the lex Julia theatralis’, in Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers, 508–45. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. 1995. ‘Conclusion’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M.D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Spoleto. 497–511Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2002. ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 3.931–71’, CQ 52: 291–304Google Scholar
Reitz, C. and Walter, A. (eds.). 2014. Von Ursachen sprechen. Eine aitiologische Spurensuche/Telling Origins. On the Lookout for Aetiology. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L.D. and Wilson, N.G. 1974. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.H. 2012. The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1995. ‘The Roman mind and the power of fiction’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformations of Classical Traditions Presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, NJ. 117–30Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. 1985. ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’, PLLS 5: 383–401Google Scholar
Richardson, N.J. . 1994. ‘Aristotle and Hellenistic scholarship’, in Montanari, F. (ed.), La Philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 40. Geneva. 7–28Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language, tr. R. Czerny. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Robson, A.G. 1972. ‘Catullus 68:53: the coherence and force of tradition’, TAPhA 103: 433–9Google Scholar
Roca-Puig, R. 1982. Alcestis. Hexàmetres Llatins. Papyri Barcinonenses, Inv. n.° 158–161. BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91: 113–45Google Scholar
Ronan, C.J. 1988. ‘Lucan and the self-incised voids of Julius Caesar’, Comparative Drama 22: 215–26Google Scholar
Rosen, R.M. 2000. ‘Cratinus’ Pytine and the construction of the comic self’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London. 23–39Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T.G. 1969. The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica 12: 283–319Google Scholar
Rudd, N. . 1989. Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.). 1993. Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium. BristolGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. 2002. ‘A total write-off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the rhetoric of comic competition’, CQ 52: 138–63Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. . 1979. ‘De Imitatione’, in West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 1–16Google Scholar
Saller, R. 2005. ‘Framing the debate over growth in the ancient economy’, in Manning, J.G. and Morris, I. (eds.), The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models. Stanford, CA. 223–38Google Scholar
Salzman, M. 1998. ‘Deification in the Fasti and the Metamorphoses’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 9. Brussels. 313–46Google Scholar
Scarpat, G. 1964. Parrhesia. Storia del termine e delle sue traduzioni in latino. BresciaGoogle Scholar
Schanzer, E. 1956. Shakespeare’s Appian: A Selection from the Tudor Translation of Appian’s Civil Wars. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. RomeGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2009a. ‘Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective’, in Morris, I. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium. Oxford. 255–324Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2005. ‘Under the sign of Saturn: Dido’s Kulturkampf’, in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), La Représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne. Heidelberg. 85–110Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace’s Satires, Book 1, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1977. ‘Amica uis pastoribus: der Iambiker Horaz in seinem Epodenbuch’, Gymnasium 84: 401–23Google Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. . 1991. Ovids poetische Menschenwelt: Die Metamorphosen als Metapher und Symphonie. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Schnurr, C. 1992. ‘The lex Julia theatralis of Augustus: some remarks on seating problems in theatre, amphitheatre and circus’, LCM 17: 147–60Google Scholar
Schwindt, J.P. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer ‘Phänomenologie’ der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung: von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 2005. Review of I.J.F. de Jong, R. Nunlist and A. Bowie (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden, 2004), BMCR 2005.07.48Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1986. ‘Wedding ritual and textual criticism in Sophocles’ “Women of Trachis”’, Hermes 114: 50–9Google Scholar
Seaford, R. . 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Seelbach, W. 1963. ‘Zu lateinischen Dichtern (Catull c. 4, Horaz c. I 28, Lupus von Aquincum’, RhM 106: 348–51Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1992. ‘Boundaries, worlds, and analogical thinking, or How Lucretius learned to love atomism and still write poetry’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt. 137–56, with ‘Discussion’, 170–5Google Scholar
Selden, D.L. 1992. ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London. 461–512Google Scholar
Shapiro, H.A. 2005. ‘The judgment of Helen in Athenian art,’ in Barringer, J.M. and Hurwit, J.M. (eds.), Periklean Athens and its Legacy: Problems and Perspectives. Austin, TX. 47–62Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. 1996. ‘The art of deceit: Pseudolus and the nature of reading’, CQ 46: 152–74Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. . 2009. Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shell, M. . 1982. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Sider, D. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
Silk, M.S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M.B. . 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1976. ‘Zur Überlieferung und zum Text Catulls’, Acta Philologica Aenipontana 3: 68–69Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 1993. ‘Improvisation in Plautus’, in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen. 113–24Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. . 2002. Spectator Politics: Metatheater and Performance in Aristophanes. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, I. 2015. ‘Ancient etymology: a tool for thinking’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Vol. 2. Leiden. 896–922Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z. . 1987. ‘The domestication of sacrifice’, in Hamerton-Kelly, R.G. (ed.), Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford, CA. 191–205Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. 1983. ‘Archaeology’, in Crawford, M. (ed.), Sources for Ancient History. Cambridge. 137–84Google Scholar
Solodow, J.B. . 1989. ‘Forms of literary criticism in Catullus: polymetric vs. epigram’, CPh 84: 312–19Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1991. ‘Reading’ Greek Culture: Texts and Images, Rituals and Myths. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. . 2019. ‘Schools, reading and poetry in the early Greek world’, CCJ 65: 150–72Google Scholar
Speyer, W. 1971. Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum: ein Versuch ihrer Deutung. MunichGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, P. and White, A. 1986. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Šterbenc Erker, D. 2009. ‘Das Lupercalia-Fest im augusteischen Rom: Performativität, Raum und Zeit’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 11: 145–78Google Scholar
Stierle, K. 1980. ‘The reading of fictional texts’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 83–105Google Scholar
Stigers, E.S. 1977. ‘Retreat from the male: Catullus 62 and Sappho’s erotic flowers’, Ramus 6: 83–102Google Scholar
Streuli, P.E. 1969. Die Lesbia-Partien in Catulls Allius-Elegie: Ein Kommentar. UrnäschGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Ennius. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. . 1995. ‘Der Pyrrhos-Krieg in Ennius’ Annales VI im Lichte der ersten Ennius-Papyri aus Herculaneum’, ZPE 106: 31–52Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. . 2012. ‘Der Anfangsprozess der “Kanonisierung” Vergils’, in Becker, E.-M. and Scholz, S. (eds.), Kanon in Konstruktion und Dekonstruktion: Kanonisierungsprozesse religiöser Texte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Berlin. 171–219Google Scholar
Suleiman, S.R. 1980. ‘Introduction: varieties of audience-oriented criticism’, in Suleiman and Crosman (1980). 3–45Google Scholar
Suleiman, S.R. and Crosman, I. (eds.). 1980. The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Susini, G.C. 1973. The Roman Stonecutter: An Introduction to Latin Epigraphy, tr. A.M. Dabrowski. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, E.H. 2002. Horace’s Well-Trained Reader: Toward a Methodology of Audience Participation in the Odes. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, M. 1989. Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H.P. 1972–3. Die Lyrik des Horaz: Eine Interpretation der Oden. 2 Vols. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. 1998. ‘Parenthetically speaking (in Virgil and other poets)’, in Knox and Foss (1998). 141–57Google Scholar
Temin, P. 2004. ‘Financial intermediation in the early Roman Empire’, The Journal of Economic History 64: 705–33Google Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. 1999. ‘Closure and transformation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge. 142–61Google Scholar
Thomas, K. 2009. The Ends of Life: Roads to Fulfilment in Early Modern England. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1992. ‘The old man revisited: memory, reference and genre in Virgil Georgics 4.116–48’, MD 29: 44–51Google Scholar
Thomsen, O. 1992. Ritual and Desire: Catullus 61 and 62 and Other Ancient Documents on Wedding and Marriage. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, O. . 2002. ‘An introduction to the study of Catullus’ wedding poems: the ritual drama of Catullus 62’, C&M 53: 255–87Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. 1964. ‘Interpretations of Catullus—II. Catullus 95.8’, Phoenix 18: 30–6Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. . 1998. Catullus, Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary2. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Townend, G.B. 1969. ‘Some problems of punctuation in the Latin hexameter’, CQ 19: 330–44Google Scholar
Traina, A. 1996. ‘optivo cognomine crescit: Properzio e l’ironia di Orazio’, Lexis 14: 121–4Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1973. ‘Cicero, Horace, and mutual friends: Lamiae and Varrones Murenae’, Phoenix 27: 245–61Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. . 1991. Roman Marriage: iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Vardi, A.D. 1996. ‘Diiudicatio locorum: Gellius and the history of a mode in ancient comparative criticism’, CQ 46: 81–9Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1987. ‘Personality and power: Livy’s depiction of the Appii Claudii in the First Pentad’, TAPhA 117: 203–26Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. . 1998–9. ‘The Quinctii in Livy’s First Pentad: the rhetoric of anti-rhetoric’, CW 92: 513–30Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1984. Writing History. Essay on Epistemology, tr. M. Moore-Rinvolucri. ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. . 1988. Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, tr. D. Pellauer. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Waldner, K. 2000. Geburt und Hochzeit des Kriegers: Geschlechterdifferenz und Initiation in Mythos und Ritual der griechischen Polis. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Waldner, K. . 2007. ‘Griechische und römische Aitiologie in Ovids Metamorphosen’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselman, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, Vol. 2. Berlin. 203–37Google Scholar
Waldner, K. . 2014. ‘Aitiologie und Religion in der griechisch-römischen Antike’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 25–57Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1986. ‘Image and authority in the coinage of Augustus’, JRS 76: 66–87Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. . 1987. ‘Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol. 221–30Google Scholar
Walsh, G. 1984. The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. 2014. ‘Ovids alma Venus, die Mutter der Aitiologie’, in Reitz and Walter (2014). 431–59Google Scholar
Walter, A. . forthcoming (a). “Ever Since Then”: Time in Ancient Aetiology, chapter 3.Google Scholar
Walter, A. . forthcoming (b). ‘tempora mutantur. Metamorphic imagery in Ovid’s Fasti’.Google Scholar
Walton, K.L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Watson, L.C. 1990. ‘Rustic Suffenus (Catullus 22) and literary rusticity’, PLLS 6: 13–33Google Scholar
Watson, L.C. . 1995. ‘Horace’s Epodes: the impotence of iambos?’, in S.J. Harrison (1995). 188–202Google Scholar
Wehrle, W.T. 1992. The Satiric Voice: Program, Form and Meaning in Persius and Juvenal. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
West, D.A. . 1970. ‘Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents’, Philologus 114: 262–75Google Scholar
Whitaker, G. 2007. ‘… Brevique Adnotatione Critica … : a preliminary history of the Oxford Classical Texts’, in Stray, C. (ed.), Classical Books: Scholarship and Publishing in Britain Since 1800. London. 113–34Google Scholar
White, H. . 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
White, M. and Epston, D. 1990. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wildberg, C. 1993. ‘Simplicius und das Zitat: Zur Überlieferung des Anführungszeichens’, in Berger, F., Brockmann, C., De Gregorio, G., Ghisu, M.I., Kotzabassi, S. and Noack, B. (eds.), Symbolae Berolinenses für Dieter Harflinger. Amsterdam. 87–99Google Scholar
Wilders, J. 1978. The Lost Garden: A View of Shakespeare’s English and Roman History Plays. LondonGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.D. 1992. ‘Representations of the book-roll in Latin poetry: Ovid, Tr. 1,1,3–4 and related texts’, Mnemosyne 45: 178–89Google Scholar
Williams, G.D. . 2002. ‘Ovid’s exilic poetry: worlds apart’, in Body, B.W. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden. 337–81Google Scholar
Williams, G.W. . 1978. Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J.J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1950. Libertas as a Political Ideal at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1976/1987. ‘Catullus 16’, LCM 1: 14–17 = Roman Studies Literary and Historical. Liverpool. 222–4Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1982. ‘Pete nobiles amicos: poets and patrons in late Republican Rome’, in Gold, B.K. (ed.), Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin, TX. 28–49Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, A. and Wiseman, [T.]P. 2011. Ovid: Times and Reasons. A New Translation of Fasti. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. 1972. ‘Horace’s Odes Diffugere niues and Soluitur acris hiems’, Latomus 31: 752–78Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1974. ‘Exegi monumentum: Horace, Odes 3.30’, in Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. Cambridge. 115–28Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1979. ‘Self-imitation and the substance of history: Tacitus, Annals 1.61–5 and Histories 2.70, 5.14–15’, in West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 143–55Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1983. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 1989. ‘Virgil the historian: Aeneid 8.626–62 and Livy’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J.B. and Jocelyn, H.D. (eds.), Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C.O. Brink. Cambridge. 132–45Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2002. ‘Biformis uates: the Odes, Catullus and Greek lyric’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 53–64Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2003. ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace, Odes 2.1’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. 191–216Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2007. Sallust: Catiline’s War, the Jugurthine War, Histories. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.). 2002. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.). 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, M. and Osteen, M. (eds.). 1999. The New Economic Criticism: Studies in the Intersection of Literature and Economics. LondonGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.). 2003. Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry: A Literature and its Audience. London, Sydney, and Wolfeboro, NHGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F.I. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago, IL and LondonGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. 1980. ‘Horace’s Liber Sermonum: the structure of ambiguity’, Arethusa 13: 59–77Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1982. ‘Catullus’, in Luce, T.J. (ed.), Ancient Writers: Greece and Rome. Volume II: Lucretius to Ammianus Marcellinus. New York. 643–67Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1983. ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian past’, Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 2002. ‘Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the development of Augustan poetry’, in Woodman and Feeney (2002). 38–52Google Scholar