Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T06:15:23.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

11 - Common Foreign and Security Policy

Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • The Union’s foreign and security policy is based on a set of compromises. From the outset, Member States have been hesitant to hand over powers in this area. Yet, the strong links with other policies as well as the single institutional structure caused an integration of CFSP into the Union legal order. While its distinct nature remains clearly visible, CFSP has become part and parcel of the EU’s external relations regime.

  • In this chapter we will address the historical explanations for the current place of CFSP in the EU legal order. We will analyse the attempts to start political cooperation before the 1990s and will assess the current provisions in that context. We will also address the role of the institutions (including the role of the CJEU) in CFSP as well as the decision-making procedures. Finally, we will assess the legal nature and function of the CFSP instruments.

  • Introduction

    The CFSP of the EU has for decades been the ‘odd one out’. It emerged separately from the EEC in an incremental, pragmatic fashion at the beginning of the 1970s. The process was stimulated through the realization that the coordination of the different foreign policies of the (six, then nine, etc.) Member States was helpful, and occasionally even necessary, for the Community to pursue its goals. At present CFSP objectives have become an integral part of the overall objectives of the Union. Thus, this policy area has developed from a purely intergovernmental form of information exchange, coordination and cooperation in the days of the EPC, to an EU competence in its own right and an area in which the Member States have accepted significant forms of institutionalization and legalization.

    Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
    , pp. 346 - 399
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Brkan, M., ‘The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Field of Common Foreign and Security Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon: New Challenges for the Future’, in Cardwell, P. J. (ed.), EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012), pp. 97–115.Google Scholar
    Corbett, R., The Treaty of Maastricht: From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide (Harlow, Essex: Longman Group UK, 1993).Google Scholar
    Curtin, D., ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’ (1993) 30 Common Market Law Review 17–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    De Witte, B., ‘The Pillar Structure and the Nature of the European Union: Greek Temple or French Gothic Cathedral?’, in Heukels, T., Blokker, N. and Brus, M. (eds.), The European Union after Amsterdam: A Legal Analysis (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
    Griller, S., ‘The Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy’, in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), Court of Justice of the European Union – Cour de Justice de l’Union Européene, The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law – La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 675–692.Google Scholar
    Hillion, C., ‘Tous pour un, un pour tous! Coherence in the External Relations of the European Union’, in Cremona, M. (ed.), Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Hillion, C. and Wessel, R. A., ‘Restraining External Competences of EU Member States under CFSP’, in Cremona, M. and de Witte, B. (eds.), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 79–121.Google Scholar
    Jürgens, Th., Die Gemeinsame Europäische Außen- und Sicherheidspolitik (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1994).Google Scholar
    Keukeleire, S., Het Buitenlands beleid van de Europese Unie (Deventer: Kluwer, 1998).Google Scholar
    Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union: Institutional Reforms, New Policies and International Identity of the European Community (Maastricht: EIPA, 1992).Google Scholar
    Mayer, H., ‘Germany’s Role in the Fouchet Negotiations’ (1996) 2 Journal of European Integration History, 2, 39–59.Google Scholar
    Missiroli, A., ‘The New EU Foreign Policy System after Lisbon: A Work in Progress’ (2010) 15 European Foreign Affairs Review 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Neville-Jones, P., ‘The Genscher–Colombo Proposals on European Union’ (1983) 20 Common Market Law Review 657–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Nuttall, S., ‘European Political Cooperation and the Single European Act’ (1985) 5 Year of European Law 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Stein, E., ‘European Foreign Affairs System and the Single European Act of 1986’, in Ebke, W. F. and Norton, J. J. (eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Sir Joseph Gold (Heidelberg: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 1990).Google Scholar
    Van Elsuwege, P., ‘EU External Action after the Collapse of the Pillar Structure: In Search of a New Balance between Delimitation and Consistency’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 987–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘A Legal Institutional Perspective on the European External Action Service’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘The Small Arms Judgment in an Age of Constitutional Turmoil’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review, 1, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Wessel, R. A., The European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy: A Legal Institutional Perspective (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar
    Whitman, R. and Juncos, A., ‘The Lisbon Treaty and the Foreign, Security and Defence Policy: Reforms, Implementation and the Consequences of (Non-)Ratification’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review 25–46.Google Scholar
    Whitman, R. and Juncos, A., ‘The Lisbon Treaty and the Foreign, Security and Defence Policy: Reforms, Implementation and the Consequences of (Non-)Ratification’ (2009) 14 European Foreign Affairs Review 25–46.Google Scholar
    Hillion, C. and Wessel, R. A., ‘Restraining External Competences of EU Member States under CFSP’, in Cremona, M. and de Witte, B. (eds.), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 79–121.Google Scholar
    Mayer, H., ‘Germany’s Role in the Fouchet Negotiations’ (1996) 2 Journal of European Integration History, 2, 39–59 at 43.Google Scholar
    Jürgens, Th., Die Gemeinsame Europäische Außen- und Sicherheidspolitik (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1994).Google Scholar
    Nuttall, S., ‘European Political Cooperation and the Single European Act’ (1985) 5 Year of European Law 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Corbett, R., The Treaty of Maastricht: From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide (Harlow, Essex: Longman Group UK, 1993).Google Scholar
    Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union: Institutional Reforms, New Policies and International Identity of the European Community (Maastricht: EIPA, 1992), pp. 407–412.Google Scholar
    Heukels, T., Blokker, N. and Brus, M. (eds.), The European Union after Amsterdam: A Legal Analysis (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
    DG for External Policies of the Union, Policy Department, The Lisbon Treaty and its Implications for CFSP/ESDP (Briefing Paper, European Parliament, February 2008)Google Scholar
    Griller, S., ‘The Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy’, in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), Court of Justice of the European Union – Cour de Justice de l’Union Européene, The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law – La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 675–692 at 685.Google Scholar
    Brkan, M., ‘The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Field of Common Foreign and Security Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon: New Challenges for the Future’, in Cardwell, P. J. (ed.), EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012), pp. 97–115 at 100.Google Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×