Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T00:27:08.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - CONCEPTS AND METHODS IN PALEOBOTANY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2010

Dena F. Dincauze
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

At times, evidence from different sources may on the face of it appear to be contradictory. Ultimately, of course, there can be no contradiction.

DIMBLEBY 1985: xi

Not long ago the biosphere encompassed by definition two taxonomic kingdoms: Animals and Plants. Fungi and algae were included in the plant kingdom, and bacteria were somewhere between. The currently dominant taxonomy (systematic classifi- cation), based in large measure on organic form, recognizes five kingdoms, with bacteria and some algae included in Monera, other algae and simple “eukaryotic” organisms (having discrete nuclei in their cells) in Protista, and Fungi in a kingdom of their own (Margulis and Schwartz 1982). The kingdom of Plantae includes most of what we recognize as plants (vegetation) – trees, shrubs, flowers, mosses, ferns, and so forth. Recent research in microbiology has forced reconsideration of the organization and history of life, and initiated a period of classificatory revisions. An emerging taxonomy based on molecular criteria proposes three “domains” at the foundation of life: Archaea (microbes unlike bacteria), Bacteria (with blue-green algae), and Eukarya (all organismswith distinct cell nuclei). Members of the newly recognized group, Archaea, are separate from but differentially related to the two other groups, and with bacteria comprise the prokaryotes (organisms lacking cell nuclei). The domain of Eukarya includes plants, animals, fungi, and protists (single-celled organisms with cellular nuclei). As the new criteria are tested against extant classifications, the results are likely to rearrange classes even further and modify phylogenetic trees (Pace 1997). Archaeologists can wait for these developments but should be aware of the new uncertainties and alert to the need for clear analytical language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Archaeology
Principles and Practice
, pp. 329 - 368
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×