Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-54jdg Total loading time: 4.127 Render date: 2022-08-08T02:32:53.279Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Section 3 - Fetal Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona Ventura
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
The EBCOG Postgraduate Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Obstetrics & Maternal-Fetal Medicine
, pp. 83 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bhutta, ZA, Dean, SV, Imam, AM, Lassi, ZS. A systematic review of preconception risks and interventions. Karachi, Aga Khan University, 2011. site_media/media/articles/Preconception_ Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dean, S, Bhutta, Z, Mason, EM, et al., eds. Care before and between pregnancy. In Born Too Soon: Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. New York: World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
Stothard, KJ, Tennant, PWG, Bell, R, Rankin, J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies, a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(6).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, CC, Mahmood, T. Obesity and pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(3):309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson-Piercy, C, ed. Handbook of Obstetric Medicine, 4th ed. London: Informa Healthcare; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICE. Guidance on Pre-Conception – Advice and Management, NICE Quality Statement 7, revised in August 2017.Google Scholar
RCOG. Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling, Green-top Guideline No 8. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.Google Scholar
ISUOG Educational Committee recommendations for basic training in obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:113–16.Google Scholar
Salvesen, K, Lees, C, Abramovicz, J, et al. ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13+6 week fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:625–8.Google ScholarPubMed
De Vries, JIP, Visser, GHA, Prechtl, HFR. The emergence of fetal behaviour, I. Qualitative aspects. Early Hum Dev. 1982;7:301–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, HP, Fleming, JEE. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘crown-rump length’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:702–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:102–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Napolitano, R, Dhami, J, Ohuma, EO, et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: systematic review of charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121:556–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papageorghiou, AT, Kennedy, SH, Salomon, IJ, et al. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:641–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Springhall, EA, Rolnik, DL, Reddy, M, et al. How to perform a sonographic morphological assessment of the fetus at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Australian J Ultrasound Med. 2018;21:125–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Dias, T, Arcangeli, T, Bhide, A, et al. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:330–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Rodgers, M, Baschat, A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Condous, G, et al. The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2824–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdallah, Y, Daemen, A, Kirk, E, et al. Limitations of current definitions of miscarriage using mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length measurements: a multicentre observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:497502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Memar, M, Kirk, E, Bourne, T. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of early pregnancy complications. Obstet Gynaecol. 2015:17:173–81.Google Scholar
Thilaganathan, B. The evidence base for miscarriage diagnosis: better late than never. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:487–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, CB, Genest, DR, Bernstein, MR, et al. Sonographic appearance of first trimester hydatidiform moles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000,16:188–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Condous, G, Bottomley, C, Bourne, T. The accuracy of first trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:70–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, JN, Roberts, NW, Salomon, LJ, Papageorghiou, AT. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:429–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, KO, Staboulidou, I, Cruz, J, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Two-stage first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by ultrasound assessment and biochemical testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol .2010;36;542–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santorum, M, Wright, D, Syngelaki, A, Karagioti, S, Nicolaides, KH. Accuracy of first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:714–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salomon, IJ, Alfirevic, Z, Audibert, F, et al. ISUOG consensus statement on the impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on prenatal practice. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:122–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, MY, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, et al. Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:186–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus, AD, El-Harbachi, H, Rousian, M, et al. Early first-trimester trophoblast volume in pregnancies that result in live birth or miscarriage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:577–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, KH, Azar, G, Byrne, D, Mansur, C, Marks, K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ. 1992;304:867–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makrydimas, G, Sotiriadis, A, Ioannidis, JPA. Screening performance of first trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alldred, SK, Takwoingi, Y, Guo, B, et al. First trimester serum tests for Down´s syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD011975. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011975.Google ScholarPubMed
Alldred, SK, Takwoingi, Y, Guo, B, et al. First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down’s syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2017, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD012600. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600.Google ScholarPubMed
Lo, YMD, Corbetta, N, Chamberlain, PF, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar, P, Shani, H, Evans, MI. Cell-free, DNA. Comparison of technologies. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36:199211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianchi, DW, Chiu, RWK. Sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA during pregnancy. N Eng J Med. 2018;379:464–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rink, BD, Norton, ME. Screening for fetal aneuploidy. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40:3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, ME, Jacobsson, B, Swamy, GK, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1589–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil, MM, Quezada, MS, Revello, R, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:249–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badeau, M, Lindsay, C, Blais, J, et al. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD011767. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD11767.pub2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, L, Hutchinson, B, Poulton, A, Halliday, J. Population-based impact of noninvasive prenatal screening on screening and diagnostic testing for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med. 2017;19:1338–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, I, Petersen, OB, Christensen, R, et al. Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:480–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, B, Morris, JK, McConkey, R, et al. Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening. BJOG. 2014;121:809–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, W, Dugoff, L. Screening for aneuploidy in multiple gestations. The challenges and options. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45:4153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghi, T, Sotiriadis, A, Calda, P et al. on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabor, A, Philip, J, Madsen, M, et al. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986;1:1287–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Athanasiadis, AP, Pantazis, K, Goulis, DG, et al. Comparison between 20 G and 22 G needle for second trimester amniocentesis in terms of technical aspects and short-term complications. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:761–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Navaratnam, K, Mujezinovic, F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD003252. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.Google ScholarPubMed
Akolekar, R, Beta, J, Picciarelli, G, Ogilvie, C, D’Antonio, F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malan, V, Bussières, L, Winer, N, et al. Effect of cell-free DNA screening vs direct invasive diagnosis on miscarriage rates in women with pregnancies at high risk of trisomy 21. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:557–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth, HV, Boyd, PA, Chamberlain, P, et al. Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 56–66 days’ gestation. Lancet. 1991;337:762–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaap, AHP, van der Pol, HG, Boer, K, Leschot, NJ, Wolf, H. Long-term follow-up of infants after transcervical chorionic villus sampling and after amniocentesis to compare congenital abnormalities and health status. Pranat Diagn. 2002;22:598604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vink, J, Fuchs, K, D’Alton, ME. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32: 409–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, K, Alfirevic, Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:128–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warsof, SL, Larion, S, Abuhamad, AZ. Overview of the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:972–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabor, A, Vestergaard, CHF, Lidegaard, Ø. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:1924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Green-top Guideline No 8. London, UK; 2010. Scholar
Nizard, J, Duyme, M, Ville, Y. Teaching ultrasound-guided invasive procedures in fetal medicine: learning curves with and without an electronic guidance system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:274–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Mari, G, Norton, ME, Stone, J, et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Clinical Guideline #8: the fetus at risk for anemia–diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):697710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moise, KJ. Fetal anemia due to non-Rhesus-D red-cell alloimmunization. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Aug;13(4):207–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 6;342(1):914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moise, KJ Jr., Argoti, PS. Management and prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1132–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C, Martin, W, Somerset, DA, Thompson, PJ, Kilby, MD. Early intraperitoneal transfusion and adjuvant maternal immunoglobulin therapy in the treatment of severe red cell alloimmunization prior to fetal intravascular transfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;23(2):159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, R, Rampling, MW, Anwar, A, Talbert, DG, Rodeck, CH. Changes in hemorheology with fetal intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):726–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenburg, IT, Smits-Wintjens, VE, van Klink, JM, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after intrauterine transfusion for hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn: the LOTUS study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):141e1-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malin, G, Tonks, AM, Morris, RK, Gardosi, J, Kilby, MD. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study. BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1455–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbins, JC, Romero, R, Grannum, P, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound. I. Obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Apr 1;148(7):868–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, RK, Quinlan-Jones, E, Kilby, MD, Khan, KS. Systematic review of accuracy of fetal urine analysis to predict poor postnatal renal function in cases of congenital urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2007 Oct;27(10):900–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Wilson, C, et al. Fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: proposal for standardized multidisciplinary prenatal management based on disease severity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):476–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtz, MP, Koh, CJ, Jamail, GA, et al. Factors associated with fetal shunt dislodgement in lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Aug;36(8):720–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sananes, N, Cruz-Martinez, R, Favre, R, et al. Two-year outcomes after diagnostic and therapeutic fetal cystoscopy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Apr;36(4):297303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Quinlan-Jones, E, et al. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013 Nov 2;382(9903):1496–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yinon, Y, Kelly, E, Ryan, G. Fetal pleural effusions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Feb;22(1):7796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGivern, MR, Best, KE, Rankin, J, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Mar;100(2):F137-44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catania, VD, Muru, A, Pellegrino, M, et al. Isolated fetal ascites, neonatal outcome in 51 cases observed in a tertiary referral center. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Feb;27(1):102–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Manning, FA, Harrison, MR, Rodeck, C. Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus. Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jul 31;315(5):336–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taghavi, K, Beasley, S. The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure: application of a new therapeutic paradigm. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Sep;49(9):E420-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonni, G, Granese, R, Martins Santana, EF, et al. Prenatally diagnosed fetal tumors of the head and neck: a systematic review with antenatal and postnatal outcomes over the past 20 years. J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):149–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyeux, L, Danzer, E, Flake, AW, Deprest, J. Fetal surgery for spina bifida aperta. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Nov;103(6):F589–F595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferschl, M, Ball, R, Lee, H, Rollins, MD. Anesthesia for in utero repair of myelomeningocele. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1211–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):9931004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, K, Kohl, T, Neubauer, BA, et al. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part III: neurosurgical intervention in the first postnatal year.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;47(2):158–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gellis, L, Tworetzky, W. The boundaries of fetal cardiac intervention: Expand or tighten? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;22(6):399403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stebbins, B, Jaffe, R. Fetal biometry and gestational age estimation. In Jaffe, R, Bui, TH, eds. Textbook of Fetal Ultrasound. Carnforth: Parthenon; 1999, pp 4757.Google Scholar
Verburg, BO, Steegers, EAP, De Ridder, M, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:388–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadlock, F, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head,body and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J ObstetGynecol. 1985;151:333–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Dudley, NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:80–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, W, Balasubramaniam, M, Deter, RL, et al. New weight estimation models using fractional limb volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;34:556–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Stirnemann, J, Villar, J, Salomon, LJ, et al. International estimated fetal weight standards of the Intergrowth-21st Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:478–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uotila, J, Dastidar, P, Heinonen, T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:255–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Papageorghiou, AT, Bakoulas, V, Sebire, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Intrauterine growth in multiple pregnancies in relation to fetal number, chorionicity and gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:890–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altman, DG, Chitty, LS. Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993;3:378–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardosi, J, Mongelli, M, Wilcox, M. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:168–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardosi, J. Fetal growth: towards an international standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005:26;112–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drooger, JC, Troe, JWM, Borsboom, GJJM, et al. Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26;115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, MW, Leung, TN, Sahata, DS, Lau, TK, Chang, AMZ. Customizing fetal biometry charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannou, C, Talbot, K, Ohuma, E, et al. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG. 2012;119:1425–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papageorghiou, A, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study in the Intergrowth-21st Project. Lancet. 2014:384:869–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallaro, A, Ash, ST, Napolitano, R, et al. Quality control of ultrasound for biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiserud, T, Benachi, A, Hecher, K, Piaggio, G, Platt, LD. The World Health fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 218(2):S619-S629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, Hediger, ML, Albert, PS, et al. Association of maternal obesity with longitudinal ultrasonographic measures of fetal growth: findings from the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies – Singletons. JAMA Pediat. 2018;172:2431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, KS, Fahey, J, Platt, RW, et al. An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards? Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:616–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Odibo, AO, Cahill, AG, Goetzinger, KR, et al. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:637–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S. Editorial: fetal macrosomia in need of a policy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, HM, Mercer, BM, Catalano, PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;191:964968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolderup, LB, Laros, RK Jr, Musci, TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:3741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iffy, L, Brimacombe, M, Appuzzio, JJ, et al. The risk of shoulder dystocia related permanent fetal injury in relation to birth weight. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136:5260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boney, CM, Verma, A, Tucker, R, Vohr, BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115:290–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberwalder, M, Connor, J, Wexner, SD. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric and sphincter damage. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1333–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, SP, Grobman, WA, Gherman, RA. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:332–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, NC, Hilbert, A, Meurer, B. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:42–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatziantoniou, V, Heeney, N, Maggs, T, et al. A descriptive single‐centre experience of the management and outcome of maternal alloantibodies in pregnancy. Transfusion Med. 2017;27:275–85. doi: 10.1111/tme.12430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koelewijn, JM, Vrijkotte, TG, de Haas, M, van der Schoot, CE, Bonsel, GJ. Risk factors for the presence of non-rhesus D red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy. BJOG. 2009;116(5):655–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01984.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Management of Women with Red Cell Antibodies during Pregnancy. Green-top Guideline No 65, May 2014.Google Scholar
Chilcott, J, Lloyd Jones, M, Wight, J, et al. A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative. 2003. In NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme: Executive Summaries. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2003–. Scholar
Zipursky, A, Paul, VK. The global burden of Rh disease. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F84–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qureshi, H, Massey, E, Kirwan, D, et al. BCSH guideline for the use of anti‐D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfusion Med. 2014; 24:820. doi: 10.1111/tme.12091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackney, DN, Fau, KE, Fau, RK, et al. Management of pregnancies complicated by anti-c isoimmunization. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, M, Lane, D, Webert, K, Fallis, R. The prevalence of anti‐K in Canadian prenatal patients. Transfusion. 2015;55:1486–91. doi: 10.1111/trf.13151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smart, E, Armstrong, B, Blood group systems. ISBT Science Series. 2009;3:6892. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2824.2008.00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of RhD Alloimmunization. ACOG Practice Bulletin 181. ACOG 2017.Google Scholar
de Haas, M, Thurik, F, Koelewijn, J, Schoot, C, Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Vox Sang. 2015;109:99113. doi: 10.1111/vox.12265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, G, Hadley, A, Green, CA. Causes of fetalanemia in hemolytic disease due to anti‐K. Transfusion. 2003;43:115–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00327.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evers, D, Middelburg, RA, de Haas, M, et al. Red-blood-cell alloimmunisation in relation to antigens’ exposure and their immunogenicity: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(6):e284–92.–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of Alloimmunization during Pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin 192. ACOG 2018.Google Scholar
Scheffer, P, van der Schoot, C, Page‐Christiaens, G, de Haas, M. Noninvasive fetal blood group genotyping of rhesus D, c, E and of K in alloimmunised pregnant women: evaluation of a 7‐year clinical experience. BJOG. 2011;118:1340–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03028.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, J, Farrell, A, Soothill, P. Routine administration of anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soothill, PW, Finning, K, Latham, T, et al. Use of cffDNA to avoid administration of anti‐D to pregnant women when the fetus is RhD‐negative: implementation in the NHS. BJOG. 2015;122:1682–6.–0528.13055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White J, , Qureshi, H, Massey, E, et al. Guideline for blood grouping and red cell antibody testing in pregnancy. Transfusion Med. 2016;26:246–63. doi: 10.1111/tme.12299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH. Maternal serum anti-D antibody concentration and assessment of rhesus isoimmunisation. BMJ. 1992, 304:1155–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozlowski, CL, Lee, D, Shwe, KH, Love, EM. Quantification of anti-c in haemolytic disease of the newborn. Transfusion Med. 1995;5:3742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oepkes, D, Seaward, G, Vandenbussche, FP, et al. Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict anaemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:156–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretlove, S, Fox, C, Khan, K, Kilby, M. Noninvasive methods of detecting fetal anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2009;116:1558–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02255.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwier, C, van Kamp, I, Oepkes, D, Lopriore, E. Intrauterine transfusion and non-invasive treatment options for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn – review on current management and outcome. Expert Review of Hematol. 2017;10(4):337–44. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1305265.Google Scholar
Rodeck, CH, Nicolaides, KH, Warsof, SL, et al. The management of severe rhesus isoimmunization by fetoscopic intravascular transfusions. Am J Obstet Gyanecol. 1984;150(6):769–74.–9378Google ScholarPubMed
Dodd, JM, Windrim, RC, van Kamp, IL. Techniques of intrauterine fetal transfusion for women with red-cell isoimmunisation for improving health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD007096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007096.pub3Google ScholarPubMed
Lindenburg, IT, Klink, JM, Smits‐Wintjens, VE, et al. Long‐term neurodevelopmental and cardiovascular outcome after intrauterine transfusions for fetal anaemia: a review. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:815–22. doi:10.1002/pd.4152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, AH, Dalziel, SR, Cowan, BR, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcome following fetal anaemia and intrauterine transfusion: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:4045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, KS, Connan, K, Rowlands, S, Kornman, LH, Savoia, HF. Antenatal immunoglobulin for fetal red blood cell alloimmunization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31(5):CD008267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008267.pub2Google ScholarPubMed
Moller, AB, Petzold, M, Chou, D, Say, L. Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):e977–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downe, S, Finlayson, K, Tuncalp, O, Gulmezoglu, AM. Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392.Google ScholarPubMed
Dowswell, T, Carroli, G, Duley, L, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10): CD000934.Google ScholarPubMed
Raatikainen, K, Heiskanen, N, Heinonen, S. Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7:268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, EB, Tuuli, MG, Caughey, AB, et al. Number of prenatal visits and pregnancy outcomes in low-risk women. J Perinatol. 2016;36(3):178–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH. Turning the pyramid of prenatal care. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(3):183–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE. Antenatal Care for Uncomplicated Pregnancies. Clinical Guideline CG 62. 2019.Google Scholar
Swiss Society for Nutrition. Swiss food pyramid. 2011. Scholar
Zolotor, AJ, Carlough, MC. Update on prenatal care. Am Fam Physician. 2014;89(3):199208.Google ScholarPubMed
Good clinical practice advice: Micronutrients in the periconceptional period and pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):317–21.Google Scholar
Koletzko, B, Godfrey, KM, Poston, L, et al. Nutrition during pregnancy, lactation and early childhood and its implications for maternal and long-term child health: the early nutrition project recommendations. Ann Nutr Metab. 2019;74(2):93106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De-Regil, LM, Pena-Rosas, JP, Fernandez-Gaxiola, AC, et al. Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 14(12): CD007950.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RD, Genetics Committee, et al. Pre-conception folic acid and multivitamin supplementation for the primary and secondary prevention of neural tube defects and other folic acid-sensitive congenital anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(6):534–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Breymann, C, Honegger, C, Hosli, I, Surbek, D. Diagnosis and treatment of iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy and postpartum. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 296(6):1229–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, ME, van den Broek, N, Dou, L, Othman, M. Vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy for maternal and newborn outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 27(10):CD008666.Google Scholar
Berti, C, Cetin, I, Agostoni, C, et al. Pregnancy and infants’ outcome: nutritional and metabolic implications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(1):8291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koletzko, B, Lien, E, Agostoni, C, et al. The roles of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in pregnancy, lactation and infancy: review of current knowledge and consensus recommendations. J Perinat Med. 2008;36(1): 514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Middleton, P, Gomersall, JC, Gould, JF, et al., Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;Nov 11:CD003402.Google ScholarPubMed
Spencer, L, Bubner, T, Bain, E, Middleton, P. Screening and subsequent management for thyroid dysfunction pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 21(9):CD011263.Google Scholar
Keats, EC, Haider, B, Tam, E, Bhutta, ZA. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 14;3(3):CD004905.Google ScholarPubMed
Lumley, J, Chamberlain, C, Dowswell, T, et al. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001055.Google Scholar
Artal, R. Exercise in pregnancy: guidelines. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(3):639–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Muktabhant, B, Lawrie, TA, Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M. Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15(6):CD007145.Google Scholar
Piso, B, Reinsperger, I, Winkler, R. Recommendations from international clinical guidelines for routine antenatal infection screening: does evidence matter? Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2014;12(1):5061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBain, RD, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(9):CD000020.Google Scholar
Clausen, FB, Steffensen, R, Christiansen, M, et al. Routine noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal RHD in plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women-2 years of screening experience from Denmark. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(10):1000–5.Google Scholar
Wikman, AT, Tiblad, E, Karlsson, A, et al. Noninvasive single-exon fetal RHD determination in a routine screening program in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 Pt 1):227–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hod, M, Pretty, M, Mahmood, T. Joint position statement on universal screening for GDM in Europe by FIGO, EBCOG and EAPM. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:329–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manegold-Brauer, G, Borer, B, Bucher, C, et al. A prenatal prediction model for total nucleated cell count increases the efficacy of umbilical cord blood banking. Transfusion. 2014;54(11): 2946–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 771: Umbilical Cord Blood Banking. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):e249–53.Google Scholar
Sherer, DM. Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 2001;18(1):2337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dube, J, Dodds, L, Armson, BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):579–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adegbite, AL, Castille, S, Ward, S, Bajoria, R. Neuromorbidity in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, T, Arcangeli, T, Bhide, A, et al. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;38(5):530–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Hughes, K, Sepulveda, W, Nicolaides, KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Oct;104(10):1203–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Napolitano, R, Thilaganathan, B. Late termination of pregnancy and foetal reduction for foetal anomaly. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Aug;24(4):529–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denbow, ML, Cox, P, Taylor, M, Hammal, DM, Fisk, NM. Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):417–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gratacos, E, Carreras, E, Becker, J, et al. Prevalence of neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;24(2):159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Victoria, A, Mora, G, Arias, F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):310–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Bejar, R, Vigliocco, G, Gramajo, H, et al. Antenatal origin of neurologic damage in newborn infants. II. Multiple gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;162(5):1230–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, D, Kagan, KO, Molina, FS, Gazzoni, A, Nicolaides, KH. A mixture model of nuchal translucency thickness in screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):376–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, KO, Wright, D, Valencia, C, Maiz, N, Nicolaides, KH. Screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, fetal heart rate, free beta-hCG and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):1968–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agathokleous, M, Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;41(3):247–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, E, Batey, A, Struble, C, et al. Gestational age and maternal weight effects on fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jul;33(7):662–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, FL, Hemming, K, Allen, S, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(1):3246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwarsson, E, Jacobsson, B, Dagerhamn, J, et al. Analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high risk population – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiworapongsa, T, Chaemsaithong, P, Yeo, L, Romero, R. Pre-eclampsia part 1: current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Aug;10(8):466–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckitt, K, Harrington, D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, L, Chaemsaithong, P, Sahota, DS, Nicolaides, KH, Poon, LCY. Protocol for measurement of mean arterial pressure at 10–40 weeks’ gestation. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017 Oct;10:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, MY, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, et al. Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;52(2):186–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baschat, AA. First-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia: moving from personalized risk prediction to prevention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;45(2):119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Nicolaides, KH. How to record uterine artery Doppler in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):478–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Tayyar, A, Guerra, L, Wright, A, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Uterine artery pulsatility index in the three trimesters of pregnancy: effects of maternal characteristics and medical history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;45(6):689–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, AM, Bindra, R, Curcio, P, Cicero, S, Nicolaides, KH. Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):583–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cnossen, JS, Morris, RK, ter Riet, G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008 Mar 11;178(6):701–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sotiriadis, A, Hernandez-Andrade, E, da Silva Costa, F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velauthar, L, Plana, MN, Kalidindi, M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;43(5):500–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. Early prediction of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:297397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plasencia, W, Maiz, N, Bonino, S, Kaihura, C, Nicolaides, KH. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):742–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, R, Killam, AP, Battaglia, FC, Makowski, EL, Meschia, G. The stimulation of uterine blood flow by various estrogens. Endocrinology. 1974 Apr;94(4):1192–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusanovic, JP, Romero, R, Chaiworapongsa, T, et al. A prospective cohort study of the value of maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in early pregnancy and midtrimester in the identification of patients destined to develop preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Nov;22(11):1021–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosinski, P, Bomba-Opon, D, Biskupski Samaha, RB, Wielgos, M. Suitable application of selected biochemical and biophysical markers during the first trimester screening. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(6):440–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, AE, Mauad Filho, F, Abreu, PS, et al. Reproducibility of first- and second-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index measured by transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):546–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onwudiwe, N, Yu, CK, Poon, LC, Spiliopoulos, I, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of pre-eclampsia by a combination of maternal history, uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;32(7):877–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, S, Cerdeira, AS, Redman, C, Vatish, M. Meta-analysis and systematic review to assess the role of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placenta growth factor ratio in prediction of preeclampsia: the SaPPPhirE Study. Hypertension. 2018 Feb;71(2):306–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeisler, H, Llurba, E, Chantraine, F, et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio and time to delivery in women with suspected preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):261–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayyar, A, Krithinakis, K, Wright, A, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Mean arterial pressure at 12, 22, 32 and 36 weeks’ gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):573–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsiakkas, A, Mendez, O, Wright, A, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 at 12, 22, 32 and 36 weeks’ gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):478–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Bredaki, FE, Matalliotakis, M, Wright, A, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein at 12, 22 and 32 weeks’ gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):466–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Low levels of maternal serum PAPP-A in the first trimester and the risk of pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2008 Jan;28(1):710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Maiz, N, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Penco, JM, Nicolaides, KH. Longitudinal changes in maternal serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 in women at increased risk of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):324–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Gorman, N, Tampakoudis, G, Wright, A, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Uterine artery pulsatility index at 12, 22, 32 and 36 weeks’ gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):565–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberge, S, Bujold, E, Nicolaides, KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):287–93 e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Nicolaides, KH. Low-dose aspirin for prevention of adverse outcomes related to abnormal placentation. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):642–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolnik, DL, Wright, D, Poon, LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743 Summary: low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):254–6.Google Scholar
Redman, CW. Hypertension in pregnancy: the NICE guidelines. Heart. 2011 Dec;97(23):1967–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lausman, A, McCarthy, FP, Walker, M, Kingdom, J. Screening, diagnosis, and management of intrauterine growth restriction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Jan;34(1):1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treyvaud, K. Parent and family outcomes following very preterm or very low birth weight birth: a review. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):131–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:1742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, SN, van Asselt, AD, Tomini, F, et al. Rapid fetal fibronectin testing to predict preterm birth in women with symptoms of premature labour: a systematic review and cost analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2013 Sep;17(40):1138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, DA, Haeri, S, Silber, AC, et al. Placental alpha microglobulin-1 compared with fetal fibronectin to predict preterm delivery in symptomatic women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1183–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, HS, Chin, PS, Yeo, GS, Kwek, K. Comparison of bedside test kits for prediction of preterm delivery: phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (pIGFBP-1) test and fetal fibronectin test. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007 Jun;36(6):399402.Google ScholarPubMed
To, MS, Skentou, CA, Royston, P, Yu, CK, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):362–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celik, E, To, M, Gajewska, K, Smith, GC, Nicolaides, KH, Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening G. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):549–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honest, H, Bachmann, LM, Coomarasamy, A, et al. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;22(3):305–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Greco, E, Lange, A, Ushakov, F, Calvo, JR, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from endocervical length at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jan;31(1):84–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonseca, EB, Celik, E, Parra, M, Singh, M, Nicolaides, KH, Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening G. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 02;357(5):462–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Vidyadhari, D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE. Multiple Pregnancy: Antenatal Care for Twin and Triplet Pregnancies. Clinical Guideline CG129. 2011. Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No 144: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1118–32.–201405000-00040Google Scholar
European Perinatal Health Report [Internet]. Available from: www.europeristat.comGoogle Scholar
Pison, G, D’Addato, A V. Frequency of twin births in developed countries. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9:250–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C, Zhao, ZZ, Lambalk, CB, et al. Dizygotic twinning. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(1):37-47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bręborowicz, GH, Malinowski, W. Atlas ciąży wielopłodowej. Poznań: Ośrodek Wydawnictw Naukowych; 2008.Google Scholar
Manso, P, Vaz, A, Taborda, A, Silva, IS. [Chorionicity and perinatal complications in twin pregnancy: a 10 years case series]. Acta Med Port. 2011;24:695–8.Google Scholar
Goya, M, Carreras, E, Cabero, L. Re: ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(5):669-70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Twin pregnancies with two separate placental masses can still be monochorionic and have vascular anastomoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:804–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Deprest, J. Assessment of twin gestation. In Coady, AM, Bower, S, eds. Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Abnormalities, 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier Ltd; 2015.Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1103.Google ScholarPubMed
Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27:181–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A. Modified diagnostic criteria for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome prior to 18 weeks’ gestation: time to change? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:804–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999;19:550–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Cooper, E, Townsend, R, Thilaganathan, B. Evolution of stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016;19:207–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habli, M, Bombrys, A, Lewis, D, et al. Incidence of complications in twin-twin transfusion syndrome after selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:417.e1417.e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robyr, R, Lewi, L, Salomon, LJ et al. Prevalence and management of late fetal complications following successful selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:796803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gemert, MJC, van den Wijngaard, JPHM, Vandenbussche, FPHA. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence is more common than generally accepted. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015;103:641–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffensen, TS, Gilbert-Barness, E, Spellacy, W, Quintero, RA. Placental pathology in trap sequence: clinical and pathogenetic implications. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2008;27:1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gemert, MJC, Ross, MG, Nikkels, PGJ, Wijngaard JPHM van den. Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: Model simulations. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106:1008–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: Analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:643–8.Google Scholar
Kalafat, E, Sebghati, M, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity‐specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:928–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Antonio, F, Thilaganathan, B, Dias, T, Khalil, A, Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Influence of chorionicity and gestational age at single fetal loss on risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:723–7.Google Scholar
Prognosis for the Co-Twin Following Intrauterine Single-Twin Death. Swiss Society of Neonatology; 2016 [Internet]. Available from: Scholar
Landy, H. The vanishing twin: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, A, de Crespigny, LC. Vanishing twins: the frequency of spontaneous fetal reduction of a twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2(2):107-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
A.C.O.G., S.M-F.M. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet and higher order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1118–32.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Multiple Pregnancy: The Management of Twin and Triplet Pregnancies in the Antenatal Period. London: RCOG Press; 2011.Google Scholar
Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Wright, C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1306–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JS. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67:675–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cincotta, R, Flenady, V, Hockey, R, King, J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying coefficient approach. Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand, 5th Annual Congress: 2001; Canberra, Australia. 2001. p. 22.Google Scholar
Minakami, H, Sato, I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. JAMA. 1996;275:1432–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twin and triplet pregnancy: NICE guideline DRAFT. March 2019.Google Scholar
Lausman, A, Kingdom, J; Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(8):741–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus, Green-top Guideline No 31. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2002.Google Scholar
Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Godfrey, KM, Hanson, MA, Kiserud, T. Redistribution pattern of fetal liver circulation in intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(10):1118–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, LS, Cherian, AG, Beck, MM. Management of intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Med Issues. 2017;15:271–7.Google Scholar
Bloom, S, Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, et al. Fetal-growth disorders. In Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, et al. Predictors of neonate outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Practice Bulletin no. 12, 2000. Scholar
Sharma, D, Shastri, S, Farahbakhsh, N, Sharma, P. Intrauterine growth restriction – part 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;29(24):3977–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Suhag, G, Berghella, V. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): etiology and diagnosis. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2013;2(2):102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, M, Deepak, M. Intrauterine growth retardation: a review article. J Neonatal Biol. 2014;3(3):111.Google Scholar
Figueras, F, Gratacós, E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:8698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, S, Galan, HL. Fetal Growth Restriction. Maternal-Fetal Evidence Based Guidelines, 2nd ed. London: Informa Health Care; 2012. pp. 329–44.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD007529.Google Scholar
Berghella, V. Prevention of recurrent fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):904–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueras, F, Gardosi, J. Should we customize fetal growth standards? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25:297303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandruzzato, G, Antsaklis, A, Botet, F, et al. WAPM. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). J Perinat Med. 2008;36(4):277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D, Shastri, S, Sharma, P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2016 Jul 14;10:6783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzo, G, Arduini, D. Intrauterine growth restriction: diagnosis and management. A review. Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Oct;61(5):411–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, et al. Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:41–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Hecher, K. Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease. Semin Perinatol. 2004 Feb;28(1):6780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, N, Tachibana, D, Kurihara, Y, et al. Alterations in time intervals of ductus venosus and atrioventricular flow velocity waveforms in growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):221–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA. Pathophysiology of fetal growth restriction: implications for diagnosis and surveillance. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):617–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):160–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mari, G, Picconi, J. Doppler vascular changes in intrauterine growth restriction. Semin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;32(3):182–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardi, G, Marconi, AM, Cetin, I. Placental-fetal interrelationship in IUGR fetuses– a review. Placenta. 2002 Apr;23 Suppl A:S136–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberry, M, Soothill, P. Management of fetal growth restriction. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F62-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, VR, Pilliod, RA, Frias, AE, et al. When is the optimal time to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(5):690–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueras, F, Gratacos, E. An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;38:4858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA. Fetal growth restriction – from observation to intervention. J Perinat Med. 2010 May;38(3):239–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maulik, D, Mundy, D, Heitmann, E, Maulik, D. Umbilical artery Doppler in the assessment of fetal growth restriction. Clin Perinatol. 2011 Mar;38(1):6582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JL, Kuller, JA, Rhee, EH. Antenatal surveillance of fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012 Sep;67(9):554–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, J. Weight and length at birth of infants of diabetic mothers. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1954 Aug 1;16(4):330–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Frienkel, N. Banting Lecture 1980. Of pregnancy and progeny. Diabetes. 1980;29(December 1980): 1023–35.Google Scholar
Barker, DJP, Bull, A, Osmond, C, Simmonds, S. Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. Br Med J. 1990 Apr 8(301):259–62.Google Scholar
Barker, DJ, Osmond, C, Winter, PD, Margetts, B, Simmonds, S. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet. 1989 Sep 9;334(8663):577–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, DJP, Osmond, C, Kajantie, E, Eriksson, JG. Growth and chronic disease: findings in the Helsinki Birth Cohort. Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Jan 1;36(5):445–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJP. Fetal & Infant Origins of Adult Disease. London: British Medical Journal; 1992.Google Scholar
Barker, DJP, Osmond, C, Kajantie, E, Eriksson, JG. Growth and chronic disease: findings in the Helsinki Birth Cohort. Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Oct 9;36(5):445–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, K, Devaskar, SU. Fetal origins of adult disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011 Jul;41(6):158–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJP, Godfrey, KM, Gluckman, PD, et al. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet. 1993 Oct 4;341(8850):938–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kries, R, Koletzko, B, Sauerwald, T, et al. Breast feeding and obesity: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):147–50.Google Scholar
Ferreira, H, Xavier, AF Jr, Assunção, ML, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: a new approach for the identification of adults who suffered undernutrition in early life. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018;11:543-51. ScholarPubMed
Bertram, CE, Hanson, MA. Animal models and programming of the metabolic syndrome. Br Med Bull. 2001;60:103–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdge, GC, Phillips, ES, Dunn, RL, Jackson, AA, Lillycrop, KA. Effect of reduced maternal protein consumption during pregnancy in the rat on plasma lipid concentrations and expression of peroxisomal proliferator–activated receptors in the liver and adipose tissue of the offspring. Nutr Res. 2004 Aug 1;24(8):639–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, H, Serra, C. Nutrition, epigenetics, and diseases. Clin Nutr Res. 2014 Jan 1;3(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, C, Groop, L. Epigenetics: a molecular link between environmental factors and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009 Dec 1;58(12):2718–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clouaire, T, Stancheva, I. Methyl-CpG binding proteins: specialized transcriptional repressors or structural components of chromatin? Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2008;65(10):1509–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villeneuve, LM, Natarajan, R. The role of epigenetics in the pathology of diabetic complications. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol. 2010 Jul;299(1):F1425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraga, MF, Ballestar, E, Paz, MF, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005 Jul 26;102(30):10604–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aagaard-Tillery, KM, Grove, K, Bishop, J, et al. Developmental origins of disease and determinants of chromatin structure: maternal diet modifies the primate fetal epigenome. J Mol Endocrinol. 2008 Aug 1;41(2):91102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titus, L, Hatch, EE, Drake, KM, et al. Reproductive and hormone-related outcomes in women whose mothers were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES): A report from the US National Cancer Institute DES Third Generation Study. Reprod Toxicol. 2019 Mar;84:32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, BE, Haven, MI. Intensity of multigenerational carcinogenesis from diethylstilbestrol in mice. Carcinogenesis. 1997 Apr;18(4):791–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diethylstilbestrol. Rep Carcinog Carcinog Profiles. 2011;12:159–61.Google Scholar
Hoover, RN, Hyer, M, Pfeiffer, RM, et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1304–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swan, SH. Intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol: long-term effects in humans. APMIS. 2001;109(S103):S210–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, AL, Scully, RE. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina in adolescence. A report of 7 cases including 6 clear-cell carcinomas (so-called mesonephromas). Cancer, 1970;25:745–757.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, M, Nair, M, Tuffnell, D, et al. eds., on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2017.Google Scholar
Silver, RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:654–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, Saade, GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:745–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahanian, SA, Lavery, JA, Ananth, CV, Vintzileos, A. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:S7890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauniaux, E, Jurkovic, D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33:244–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klar, M, Michels, KB. Cesarean section and placental disorders in subsequent pregnancies–a meta‐analysis. J Perinat Med. 2014;42:571–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, NE, Fu, R, Guise, JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(262.):e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downes, KL, Hinkle, SN, Sjaarda, LA, Albert, PS, Grantz, KL. Previous prelabor or intrapartum cesarean delivery and risk of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(669):e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karami, M, Jenabi, E, Fereidooni, B. The association of placenta previa and associated reproductive techniques: a meta‐analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;284:4751.Google Scholar
Shobeiri, F, Jenabi, E. Smoking and placenta previa: a meta‐analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:2985–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, T, Pariente, G, Sergienko, R, Wiznitzer, A, Sheiner, E. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):4751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leerentveld, RA, Gilberts, EC, Arnold, MJ, Wladimiroff, JW. Accuracy and safety of transvaginal sonographic placental localization. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:759–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weis, MA, Harper, LM, Roehl, KA, Odibo, AO, Cahill, AG. Natural history of placenta previa in twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:753–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mimura, T, Hasegawa, J, Nakamura, M, et al. Correlation between the cervical length and the amount of bleeding during cesarean section in placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:830–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blood Transfusions in Obstetrics. Green‐top Guideline No 47. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2015.Google Scholar
Gyamfi‐Bannerman, C, Thom, EA, Blackwell, SC, et al.; NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1311–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Publications Committee, Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine, Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:430–9.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, KE, Sellers, S, Spark, P, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case‐control study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauniaux, E, Bhide, A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:2736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management, Green‐top Guideline No 27a. London: RCOG; 2018Google Scholar
Wright, JD, Silver, RM, Bonanno, C, et al. Practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists regarding placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1602–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentilhes, L, Ambroselli, C, Kayem, G, et al. Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:526–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YL, Duan, XH, Han, XW, et al. Comparison of temporary abdominal aortic occlusion with internal iliac artery occlusion for patients with placenta accreta ‐ a non‐randomised prospective study. Vasa. 2017;46:53–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, S, Butler, K, Monaghan, S, et al. Multiple complications following the use of prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon catheterisation in a patient with placenta percreta. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:70–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM. Occurrence of placental abruption in relatives. BJOG. 2009;116:693–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tikkanen, M. Etiology, clinical manifestations, and prediction of placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:732–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pariente, G, Wiznitzer, A, Sergienko, R, et al. Placental abruption: critical analysis of risk factors and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;24:698702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykke, JA, Dideriksen, KL, Lidegaard, O, Langhoff-Roos, J. First trimester vaginal bleeding and complications later in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:935–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronsteen, R, Whitten, A, Balasubramanian, M, et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK National Screening Committee. Screening for Vasa Praevia in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy. External Review Against Programme Appraisal Criteria for the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC). London: UK NSC; 2017.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Figures at a glance. Scholar
El-Khoury Lesueur, F, Sutter-Dallay, AL, Panico, L, et al. The perinatal health of immigrant women in France: a nationally representative study. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(9):1027–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papoulidis, I, Oikonomidou, E, Orru, S, et al. Prenatal detection of TAR syndrome in a fetus with compound inheritance of an RBM8A SNP and a 334kb deletion: a case report. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(1):163–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakiridis, I, Mamopoulos, A, Papazisis, G, et al. Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional study in northern Greece. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28(2):321–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchior, M, Chollet, A, Glangeaud-Freudenthal, N, et al. Tobacco and alcohol use in pregnancy in France: the role of migrant status: the nationally representative ELFE study. Addict Behav. 2015;51:6571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Good Maternal Nutrition the Best Start in Life. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization; 2010, pp. 3458.Google Scholar
Osei-Kwasi, HA, Powell, K, Nicolaou, M, Holdsworth, M. The influence of migration on dietary practices of Ghanaians living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study. Ann Hum Biol. 2017;44(5):454–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngongalah, L, Rankin, J, Rapley, T, et al. Dietary and physical activity behaviours in African migrant women living in high income countries: a systematic review and framework synthesis. Nutrients. 2018;10(8)pii:E1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essen, B, Hanson, BS, Ostergren, PO, Lindquist, PG, Gudmundsson, S. Increased perinatal mortality among sub-Saharan immigrants in a city-population in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(9):737–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal Care for Uncomplicated Pregnancies. Clinical Guideline. 26 March 2008.Google Scholar
Rofail, D, Colligs, A, Abetz, L, Lindemann, M, Maguire, L. Factors contributing to the success of folic acid public health campaigns. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(1):90–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, A, Gilder, ME, Moo, P, et al. Folate supplementation to prevent birth abnormalities: evaluating a community-based participatory action plan for refugees and migrant workers on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Public Health. 2018;161:83–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fawcett, EJ, Fawcett, JM, Mazmanian, D. A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of pica during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133(3):277–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simkhada, B, Teijlingen, ER, Porter, M, Simkhada, P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(3):244–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandasamy, T, Cherniak, R, Shah, R, Yudin, MH, Spitzer, R. Obstetric risks and outcomes of refugee women at a single centre in Toronto. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(4):296302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alhasanat, D, Fry-McComish, J. Postpartum depression among immigrant and arabic women: literature review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(6):1882–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagnon, AJ, Zimbeck, M, Zeitlin, J, et al. Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(6):934–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaam, MC, Akerjordet, K, Lyberg, A, et al. A qualitative review of migrant women’s perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(9):1919–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zong, Z, Huang, J, Sun, X, et al. Prenatal care among rural to urban migrant women in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dopfer, C, Vakilzadeh, A, Happle, C, et al. Pregnancy related health care needs in refugees – a current three center experience in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):pii: E1934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantwell, R, Clutton-Brock, T, Cooper, G, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118 Suppl 1:1203.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, L, Hunter, B, Jones, A. The midwife–woman relationship in a South Wales community: Experiences of midwives and migrant Pakistani women in early pregnancy. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslehurst, N, Brown, H, Pemu, A, Coleman, H, Rankin, J. Perinatal health outcomes and care among asylum seekers and refugees: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Medicine. 2018;16(1):89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbeck, JS, Lindsey, AM, Carrieri, VL. The development of an instrument to measure social support. Nurs Res. 1981;30(5):264–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. NICE Guideline. 25 February 2015.Google Scholar
Mogos, MF, Salinas-Miranda, AA, Salemi, JL, Medina, IM, Salihu, HM. Pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders and immigrant status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017;19(6):1488–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson-Helm, ME, Teede, HJ, Cheng, IH, et al. Maternal health and pregnancy outcomes comparing migrant women born in humanitarian and nonhumanitarian source countries: a retrospective, observational study. Birth. 2015;42(2):116–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson-Helm, M, Teede, H, Block, A, et al. Maternal health and pregnancy outcomes among women of refugee background from African countries: a retrospective, observational study in Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 151: Cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster, and toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1510–25.Google Scholar
Ramos, JM, Milla, A, Rodriguez, JC, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among immigrant and native pregnant women in Eastern Spain. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(5):1447–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagklis, T, Papazisis, G, Tsakiridis, I, et al. Prevalence of antenatal depression and associated factors among pregnant women hospitalized in a high-risk pregnancy unit in Greece. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(7):1025–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICE. Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health. Clinical Management and Service Guidance. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; 2014.Google Scholar
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Perinatal Anxiety and Depression. 2015.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for Perinatal Depression. Committee Opinion Number 630. May 2015. Reaffirmed 2016.Google Scholar
Siu, AL, USPST, Bibbins-Domingo, K, et al. Screening for depression in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, FM, Hatch, SL, Comacchio, C, Howard, LM. Prevalence and risk of mental disorders in the perinatal period among migrant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20(3):449–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellmeth, G, Fazel, M, Plugge, E. Migration and perinatal mental health in women from low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124(5):742–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, GS, Grontved, A, Mortensen, LH, Andersen, AM, Rich-Edwards, J. Maternal mortality among migrants in Western Europe: a meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(7):1628–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gissler, M, Alexander, S, MacFarlane, A, et al. Stillbirths and infant deaths among migrants in industrialized countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):134–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Waiswa, P, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Am, W, Shepherd, E, Middleton, P, et al. Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes (Review) summary of findings for the main comparison. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(12):CD012203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012203.pub2Google Scholar
Van Dinter, MC, Graves, L. Managing adverse birth outcomes: helping parents and families cope. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(9):900–4. ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS. The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. J Nutr. 2003;133(5 Suppl 2):1592S-6S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1592SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frøen, JF, Lawn, JE, Heazell, AEP, et al. Ending Preventable Stillbirths: An Executive Summary for The Lancet’s Series Ending Preventable Stillbirths. 2016.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, UM. Management of pregnancy after stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(3):700–9. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eba25eCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, K, Scott, NW, Jones, GT, Bhattacharya, S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;350:h3080. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000472120.21647.71Google ScholarPubMed
Baskaradoss, JK, Geevarghese, A, Al Dosari, AAF. Causes of adverse pregnancy outcomes and the role of maternal periodontal status – a review of the literature. Open Dent J. 2012;6(1):7984. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malacova, E, Regan, A, Nassar, N, et al. Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction following exposure in a previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;125(2):183–92. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000574Google Scholar
Getahun, D, Lawrence, JM, Fassett, MJ, et al. The association between stillbirth in the first pregnancy and subsequent adverse perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):378.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monari, F, Pedrielli, G, Vergani, P, et al. Adverse perinatal outcome in subsequent pregnancy after stillbirth by placental vascular disorders. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155761CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth, Green-top Guide No 55. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.Google Scholar
Gravensteen, IK, Jacobsen, EM, Sandset, PM, et al. Anxiety, depression and relationship satisfaction in the pregnancy following stillbirth and after the birth of a live-born baby: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1666-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Côte-Arsenault, D, Mahlangu, N. Impact of perinatal loss on the subsequent pregnancy and self: women’s experiences. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1999;28(3):274–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01992.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, PA, Kavanaugh, K. Supporting parents during and after a pregnancy subsequent to a perinatal loss. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1998;12(2):6371. doi: 10.1097/00005237-199809000-00007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagnon, A, Wilson, RD, Audibert, F, et al. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2008;30(10):918–32. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, A, Langlois, S, Macfarlane, J, Vallance, H, Joseph, KS. Prediction of obstetrical risk using maternal serum markers and clinical risk factors. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(2):172–9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakhi, N, Govind, A, Moretti, M, Jones, J. Maternal serum analytes as markers of adverse obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;14:267–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-4667.2012.00132.xGoogle Scholar
Frøen, JF, Cacciatore, J, McClure, EM, et al. Stillbirths: why they matter. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1353–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62232-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator and Monitoring Framework for the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2016.Google Scholar
Ladhani, NNN, Fockler, ME, Stephens, L, Barrett, JFR, Heazell, AEP. No. 369 –Management of Pregnancy Subsequent to Stillbirth. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2018;40(12):1669-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS England. Saving Babies’ Lives: A Care Bundle for Reducing Stillbirth. 2016.Google Scholar
NHS England. Saving Babies’ Lives Version Two: A Care Bundle for Reducing Perinatal Mortality. March 2019.Google Scholar
Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes, Green-top Guideline No 44. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.Google Scholar
Antepartum Haemorrhage, Green-top Guideline No 63. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011.Google Scholar
Reproductive Outcomes after Local Treatment for Preinvasive Cervical Disease, Scientific Impact Paper No 21. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2016.Google Scholar
NICE Guideline NG25: Preterm Labour and Birth. November 2015.Google Scholar
Prevention of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease, Green-top Guideline No 36. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2017.Google Scholar
Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24+0 Weeks of Gestation, Green-top Guideline No 73. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist, 2019 Scholar
Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomized trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9261):979–94.Google Scholar
Preterm Labour, Antibiotics and Cerebral Palsy, Scientific Impact Paper No 33. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2013.Google Scholar
Antenatal Corticosteroids to Reduce Neonatal Morbidity, Green-top Guideline No 7. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.Google Scholar
Magnesium Sulphate to Prevent Cerebral Palsy following Preterm Birth, Scientific Impact Paper No 29. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011.Google Scholar
Genital Herpes in Pregnancy, Management, Green-top Guideline No 30. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2007.Google Scholar
British HIV Association Guidelines for the Management of HIV in Pregnancy and Postpartum. 2018.Google Scholar