Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T03:09:52.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

Stephanie A. Leitch
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Early Modern Print Media and the Art of Observation
Training the Literate Eye
, pp. 315 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Agricola, Johann and Friedrich, Johann. Drey hundert gemeyner Sprichwörtter: der wir Deutschen uns gebrauchen, und doch nicht wyssen wo her sie kommen. Nuremberg: F. Peypůs, 1529.Google Scholar
Anglicus, Bartholomaeus. Van den Proprieteyten der Dinghen. Haarlem: Jacobus Bellaert, 1485.Google Scholar
Apian, Peter. Cosmographia, Additis de Eadem Re Libelllis, ut Sequens Pagina Docet. Ed. Frisius, Rainer Gemma. Antwerp: Birckman, 1539.Google Scholar
Apian, Peter. Cosmographiae Introductio: Cum Quibusdam Geo-Metriae ac Astronomiae Prin=‖cipijs ad eam Rem Necessarijs.‖. Ingolstadt: Peter and Georg Apian, 1529.Google Scholar
Apian, Peter. Cosmographie, Oft Beschrijvinghe der Geheelder Werelt van Petrus Apianus. 3. Werk, Nu Ghecorrigeert van Gemma Frisio. Metten Zeecompasse Ende Anderen Boecxkens Byden Selven Gemma Daer Toegedaen. Ed. Frisius, Rainer Gemma. Antwerp: de Bonte, 1553.Google Scholar
Apian, Peter. Instrument-Buch Durch Petrum Apianum erst von new beschriben. Zum Ersten ist darinne begriffen ein newer Quadrant, dardurch Tag vnd Nacht, bey der Sonnen, Mon vnnd andern Planeten, auch durch ettliche Gestirn die Stunden vnd ander nutzung Gefunden werden. Zum Andern, wie man die höch der Thuern vnd anderer gebew … messen soll. Zum Dritten wie man das wasser absehen oder abwegen soll … vnd wie man die Bruenne suchen soll. … Ingolstadt: Apian, 1533.Google Scholar
Apian, Peter. Practica Auff Das 1532 Jar Zu Eeren den Durchleutchtigen Hochgebornen Fürsten und HH Hern Wilhelmen und Hernn Ludwigen Pfalz Bei Rehyn Herzogen in Obern und Nider Bayern … Durch Petrum Apianum der Loblichen Hohennschul zu Ingelstat Mathematicum nach Rechter Kunst und Art der Astronomei Practiciert. Auch Wird Nachvolgenden von dem naeschst Erschinen Cometen/ Wie unnd in was Gestalt in Gemelter Apianus Observiert hat und Welhe Biß Her Dero Vil Sindt in Irem Schreiben Irrig Gefunden Bewerlich Angezaygt. Landshut: Georg Apian, 1532.Google Scholar
Aristotle, and Scotus, Michael, eds. In disem Biechlin wirt erfunden von Complexion der Menschen: zuerlernen leibliche unnd menschliche Natur ir Siten, Geberden und Nayglichayt zuerkennen und urtaylen. Strasbourg: Mathis Hüpfuff, 1511.Google Scholar
Brabant. Van Brabant die excellente Cronike … totten iare M. CCCCC. ende XXX in Junio. Antwerp: J. van Doesborch, 1530.Google Scholar
Brolesse, Hans. Hierin Begriffne Pis/ Zaygen Klaær=‖lich an/ Wie Ain Yedes Roß/ Jung vñ Alt Sol Gezämbt/‖ Dadurch Jme/ Angenomene Pœse Gewonheit/ Vbelstandt/ Vnd Vntugent/‖ Benomen/ Vnd Abgewent Werden Mag‖. Regensburg: Hans Kohl, 1539.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Barptolomaei Coclitis Bononiensis, Naturalis Philosophiæ ac Medicinæ Doctoris, Physiognomiæ et Chiromantiæ Compendium. Argentorati: Albertus, 1536.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Complexion/ Natur ‖ vnd eigenschafft eines yeden menschen ‖ zu erfaren/ auch seiner geburt stund vnnd zeychen/‖ dardurch jm all sein glück vnnd vnfal/ so jm in ‖ der zeyt seyns lebens begegnen wirt/ er-‖öffnet mag werden/ … ‖ Der sieben Planeten sampt den zwölff heimli=‖schen zeichen wirckung in des menschen geburt/‖ clerlich beschrieben.‖. Mainz: Peter Jordan, 1534.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Der schapherders ‖ Kalender. Eyn sere schone vnde nutthe ‖ boek/ myt velen fruchtbaren mate=‖rien … ‖ Jtem tho ende dusses bokes vyndeth ‖ men de Kleyne Physonomye/ vth welkere/‖ des mynschen Complexie vnde tone=‖gynghe der natuer klärlyck to ‖ erkennen werth. Rostock: Ludwig Dietz, 1523.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . In Disem Büechlin Wirt Erfunden von Complexion der Menschen. Augsburg: Hans Schönsperger, 1515.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisonomei: Complexio und Art eins ieden Menschen, ausz Gestalt und Form des Angesichts, Glider unnd allen geberden zu erlernen. Strasbourg: Egenolff, 1529.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisonomei: Eins jeden menschen Art, Natur und Complexion. Strasbourg: Egenolff, 1530.Google Scholar
Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisionomi vnd ‖ Chiromanci.‖ Eyn newß Complexion Büch=‖lein/ Der Menschen Geburt/ Sitten/ Geberden vnd Neyg=‖ligkeyten/ Auß der Phisionomi/ Chiromanci/ Den Siben ‖ Planeten/ Zwölff Zeichen/ Vnnd den XXXvj. Bildern ‖ Deß Himels/ … Quarto. Strasbourg: Jakob Cammerlander, 1540.Google Scholar
Copp, Johann. Erklärung unnd grüntliche Underweysung, alles nutzes, so in dem edlen Instrument, Astrolabium genannt, begriffen, und erfunden würt/ denen so der lateinischen Sprach unverstendig/ doch liebhaber der Kunst/ erkannt trewlich verteütscht/ unnd durch den Truck außgegangen. Augsburg: Otmar, 1525.Google Scholar
Dryander, Johann. SPHERAE MATERIALIS.‖ Siue globi coelestis. <Das ist>‖ Des Hymels lauff gründtliche außle=‖gung/ so vil zur anleytung der Astro‖nomie dienet/ mit vilen nützlichen regeln verfast/‖ durch IOHAN DRYANDERN/ genent ‖ Eychman/ ordinarien Medicum, der löblichen Vni=‖uersiteten Marpurg/ von newem ver=‖deütscht vnnd ann tag bracht.‖. Marburg: Johannis Dryander and Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1539.Google Scholar
Fabri, Johannes and Fabri, Wenceslaus. Opus sphericum Johannis de sacro busto: figuris et p[er]utili co[m]mento illustratu[m]. Agrippine: Per Henricum Quentell, 1501.Google Scholar
Gersdorff, Hans von. Stat vnd Feldtbůch ‖ Bewerter Wundtartznei. New ‖ Widerumb Ersehen. Zusampt dem Antidotari/‖ Fürsorg vnd Vorrath der Chirurgei. Beschriben ‖ von Herrn Vualthero Riuio, Medico.‖. Zů Franckenfurt. Bei Christian Egenolff.‖(M.D.LI.‖). Frankfurt: Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1551.Google Scholar
Gersdorff, Hans von and Indagine, Johannes. Feldtbůch der Wund-Artzney: sampt vilen Instrumenten der Chirurgey; vß dem Albucasi contrafayt. Chiromantia Jo. Jndagine. das Ist, die Kunst der Handtbesehung. Natürliche Astrologey, … Physiognomey, … Complexion Buch. … Canones, oder Regelen eins Yeden Kranckheyt Warlich zu Erkündigen … Strasbourg: Schott, 1540.Google Scholar
Gratarolo, Pomponio and Gratarolo, Guglielmo. Introductiones apotelesmaticae in physiognomiam, astrologiam naturalem, complexiones hominum, naturas planetarum. Cum periaxiomatibus de faciebus signorum … Quibus … accessit Gulielmi Grataroli … opuscula De memoria reparanda, augenda, conservanda; De praedictione morum naturarumque hominum; De mutatione temporum … et Pomponii Gaurici … tractatus De symmetriis, lineamentis & physiognomia, ejusque speciebus, etc. Ursellis: Apud Cornelium Sutorium, impensis Lazari Zetzneri, 1603.Google Scholar
Gratarolo, Pomponio and Gratarolo, Guglielmo. Hier Inn Begriffne Pis, Zaigen Clärlich an, Wie Ain Yedess Roß, Iüng und Alt Soll Gezämbt, Dadurch Ime, Angenomene Pöse Gewonhait Ubelstandt, … Benomen … Werden Mag. VD 16 G 592. Augsburg[?], 1530.Google Scholar
Indagine, Joannes ab and Berntsz, Jan. Chyromantia … Enn Dit Boec Leert van Drie Naturlike Consten Als Phisiognomia, Astrologia Naturalis, Chiromantia. Utrecht: Jan Berntsz, 1536.Google Scholar
Indagine, Ioannes ab and Schott, Johannes. Introdvctiones Apoteles‖maticæ elegantes, in Chyromantiam, Physiognomiam, ‖ Astrologiam naturalem, Complexiones hominum, ‖ Naturas planetarum. Cum periaxiomatibus de‖ faciebus Signorum, & canonib. de ægritu-‖dinibus, nusqua[m] fere simili tractata‖ compendio. Strasbourg: Schott, 1522.Google Scholar
Indagine, Johannes ab et al. Die Kunst der Chiromantzey: vsz Besehung der Hend. Physiognomey / vsz Anblick des Menschens. Natürlichen Astrologey noch dem Lauff der Soñen. Complexion eins yegklichen Menschens. Natürlichen Ynflüssz der Planeten. der zwolff Zeichen Angesychten. Ettliche Canones / zu Erkantnüsz der Menschen Kranckheiten / solicher weisz vormals nye beschriben oder gedruckt. Zusamen verordnet / vnd verteütscht durch … Strasbourg: Schott, 1523.Google Scholar
Jordan, Peter. Geomantia.‖ Kuenstlicher vnd rechtschaffner gebrauch ‖ der alten kleynen Geomancey/ mit welcher durch hilff der ‖ Rechnung vnd des menschen Tauffnamens/ sampt der ‖ Planeten wirckung/ in jren stunden/ allen Adams ‖ Kindern/ künfftiger zůfall des gůtten vnd ‖ bœsen glücks erœffnet wirt.‖ Zů sampt andern fünff … ‖ Tafeln … ‖ Mit beygesetztem kuenstlichen Jnstrument vñ regeln/‖ … ‖. Mainz: Peter Jordan, 1534.Google Scholar
Megenberg, Conradus. Hye Nach Volget das Puch der Natur das Innhaltet zu dem Ersten von Eygenschafft und Natur des Menschen, Darnach von der Natur und Eygenschafft des Himels, der Tier des Gefügels[!], der Kreuter, der Steyn und von Vil Ander Natürlichen Dingen. Augsburg: Baemler, 1475.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. Libellus vere aureus nec Minvs Salvtaris Qvam Festiuus de optimo reip. statu, deq[ue] noua Insula Vtopia authore clarissimo viro Thoma Moro inclytæ ciuitatis Londinensis ciue & vicecomite cura M. Petri Aegidii Antuerpie[n]sis, & arte Theodorici Martini Alustensis, Typographi almæ Louaniensium Academiæ nunc primum accuratissime editus. Louvain: Martini, 1516.Google Scholar
Münster, Sebastian. Organum Uranicum: Habes in hoc Libro Amice Lector, Explicatas Theoricas Omnium planetaru[m], atq[ue] eorunde[m] varios, singulos & quotidianos ad annos usq[ue] & ultra expressos motus, Lunæ quoq[ue] in lumine crescentis, senesce[n]tis & per eclipsim deficientis, & item Solis deliquiu[m] patientis, omne[s] varietate[s] quibus omnibus comodi adiecti sunt canones. Basel: Petri, 1536.Google Scholar
Ovidius Naso, Publius. P. Ouidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon Libri XV. Index Repertorius, Omniu[m] Fabularum, Ad Numerum Chartarum, & Seriem Alphabeti, Illis [a]Ppositus Est. Strasbourg: Schott, 1515.Google Scholar
Pelerin, Jean. Von der Kunst Perspectiva. Nuremberg: Georg Glockendon, 1509.Google Scholar
Regiomontanus, Johannes. Calendarium… Dvctv Ioannis De Monteregio. Nuremberg: Johannes Regiomontanus, 1474.Google Scholar
Regiomontanus, Johannes. Kalendarius Johannis Künigspergers: News und Volmon … Eyn schön Vergleichung der Astronomi mit der Artznei. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1532.Google Scholar
Regiomontanus, Johannes and Schöner, Johannes. Scripta clarissimi mathematici M. Ioannis Regiomontani, de torqueto, astrolabio armillari, regula magna ptolemaica, baculo[que] astronomico, &amp; observationibus cometarum, aucta necessariis, Ioannis Schoneri … additionibus. Item observationes motuum solis, ac stellarum tam fixarum [qua …] erraticarum. Item libellus M. Georgii Purbachii de quadrato geometrico. Nuremberg: Joannis Montanus and Ulricus Neuber, 1544.Google Scholar
Reisch, Gregorius. Margarita Philosophica. Strasbourg: Johannes Schott, 1504.Google Scholar
Rößlin, d.J., Eucharius. Kalender mit allen As=‖stronomischen haltungen. Von natürlichem Jnfluß der Gestirrn/‖ Planeten vnd Zeychen … ‖ ASTROLABIVM TETRAGONON.‖ Ein gar kunstlich Astrolabium/ Alle wirck‖ungen des Firmaments … zefindenn. Durch … ‖ D.Eucharium Rößlin/ Statartzt zů Franck‖furt am Meyn/ New añ tag geben.‖ Register … zů end des Kalenders. Ed. Stöffler, Johannes. Frankfurt: Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1533.Google Scholar
Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Ioannis De Sacrobusto Libellus, De Sphaera: Eiusdem Autoris Libellus, Cuius Titulus Est Computus, Eruditißimam Anni & Mensium Descriptionem Continens. Ed. Melanchthon, Philipp. Wittenberg: Jospeh Clug, 1538.Google Scholar
Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Sphaera Mundi: Eyn Anfang und Fundament der Astronomi/ Aus den Alten Astronomis dur Johannem de Sacro Busto ins Latin Zusamen Gesetzt und Nachmals Durch M. Cunrad Heynfogel von Nuremberg Verteutscht/ Unnd in Vier Teyl Getylt/ Deß Himmels Lauff Sampt Allem Gestirn/ Leichtlicher auß den bei Gesatzten Figuren Zuerlernen. Ed. Heinfogel, Conrad. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1539.Google Scholar
Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Sphera Materialis: Eyn Anfang und Fundanment der Astronomi. Ed. Cammerlander, Jakob and Heinfogel, Conrad. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1533.Google Scholar
Sacrobosco, Johannes de and Apian, Peter. Sphaera Iani de Sacrobusto astronomiae ac cosmographiae candidatis scitu apprime necessaria. Ingoldstadt: Peter and Georg Apian, 1526.Google Scholar
Sacrobosco, Johannes Regiomontanus and von Peuerbach, Georg. Spaerae Mvndi Co[m]pendiu[m] Foeliciter Inchoat.: Daran: Regiomontanus, Johannes: Disputationes contra Cremonensia in planetarum theoricas deliramenta. Mit Widmungsvorrede des Autors an die Gelehrten. – Peuerbach, Georg: Theoricae novae planetarum. Mit Gedicht auf die Drucker’Uranie quantum quantum … Venice: Johannes Lucilius Santritter and Hieronymus de Sanctis, 1488.Google Scholar
Solinus, Caius Julius, Camers, Joannes, and Singriener, Johann. Joannis Camertis … in C Julii Solini Polyistora Enarrationes. Additus Eiusdem Camertis Index. Vienna: Alantse, 1520.Google Scholar
Stelluti, Francesco. Della Fisonomia di Tvtto il Corpo Hvmano del S. Gio. Batta Della Porta. Acc. Linceo Libri Quattro Ne’ Quali Si Tratta di Quanto Intorno a Questa Materia n’ Hanno i Greci, Latini,e gli Arabi Schritto: Hora Bruemente in Tauole Sinottiche Ridotta et Ordinata. Rome: Mascardi, 1637.Google Scholar
Tannstetter, Georg, Apian, Petrus, and Witelo, . Vitellionis Ma/‖thematici Doctissimi Peri Optikēs,‖ Id Est de Natura, Ratione, & Proiectione Radiorum Uisus, Lu=‖minum, Colorum At# Formarum, Quam Uul=‖go Perspectiuam Uocant,‖ LIBRI X.‖ … Omnia Ab Hoc Autore … ‖ Diligentissime Tradita … ‖ Nunc Primum Opera Mathematico# Praestantiss.Dd.Ge-‖orgij Tanstetter & Petri Apiani in Lucem Aedita.‖. Nuremberg: Johann Petreius, 1535.Google Scholar
Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein Frembds und wunderbars Kunstbüchlin allen Molern, Bildschnitzern, Goldschmiden, Steinmetzen, Schreinern, Platnern, Waffen und Messerschmiden hochnutzlich zu gebrauchen. Strasbourg: Vogtherr, 1537.Google Scholar
Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein newes hochnutzlichs Büchlin von Erkantnüs der Kranckeyten der Augen sampt einer Figur oder Anothomia eines Augs: wie es innwendig gestaltet, volget in der andern Colum: auch Erklärung der selbigen mit Anzeigung viler nutzlicher undbewerter Hülff als Purgation, Pflaster, Collirien, Sieff, Pulver, Salben und Augenwassern wie mans machen und gebrauchen soll, einem jeden Hausshalt nutzlich. Strasbourg: Heinrichen Vogtherr, 1538.Google Scholar
Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein Wolgegrindtes Kunstreichs Sumari Büchlin Aller Sonnen Uur Uff Acht Oder Viereckette Stecklen, Innbuchsen, Zylinder u. Guldine Ring, Auch Uff Glaß, Alle Mauren Schreg Oder Unschreg Zu Machen … Strasbourg: Vogtherr, 1539.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alpers, Svetlana. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Andrews, Noam. “Albrecht Dürer’s Personal Underweysung der Messung.” Word & Image 32, no. 4 (2016): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Noam. The Polyhedrists: Art and Geometry in the Long Sixteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Areford, David S. The Viewer and the Printed Image in Late Medieval Europe. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Areford, David S. and Rowe, Nina A., eds. Excavating the Medieval Image. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, Jeffrey. “Black Arts: Renaissance and Printing Press in Nuremberg, 1493–1528.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 45, no. 1 (2008): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baigrie, Brian Scott, ed. Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldasso, Renzo. “Illustrating the Book of Nature in the Renaissance: Drawing, Painting, and Printing Geometric Diagrams and Scientific Figures.” PhD dissertation, Columbia University, 2007.Google Scholar
Baldasso, Renzo. “The Role of Visual Representation in the Scientific Revolution: A Historiographic Inquiry.” Centaurus 48 (2006): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfe, Thomas, Woodall, Joanna, and Zittel, Claus. Ad Vivum?: Visual Materials and the Vocabulary of Life-Likeness in Europe before 1800. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Robin Bruce. Astrology and Reformation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bauer, Barbara. “Die Rolle des Hofastrologen und Hofmathematicus als fürstlicher Berater.” In Buck, August, ed., Höfischer Humanismus. Weinheim: Acta Humaniora, 1989.Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim. “Practical Geometry and Operative Knowledge.” Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science and Technology 6 (1998): 195222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besse, Jean-Marc. “Cosmography and Geography in the Sixteenth Century: The Position of Oronce Fine between Mathematics and History.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar
Besse, Jean-Marc. “Mapping, Constructing, Inventing: On the Notion of Project and Its Epistemology.” First published in Le Gout du monde: Exercises de paysage. Arles: Actes Sud/ENSP, 2009.Google Scholar
Bishop, Malcom. “Ambrosius Holbein’s Memento Mori Map for Sir Thomas More’s Utopia: The Meanings of a Masterpiece of Early Sixteenth Century Graphic Art.” British Dental Journal 199, no. 2 (2005): 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Ann. “Humanist Methods in Natural Philosophy: The Commonplace Book.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53, no. 4 (1992): 541–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Donald L.Vogtherr’s Büchlin.” Documenta Ophthalmologica 93 (1997): 73–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleichmar, Daniela. Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Marie. The Scientific Renaissance 1450–1630. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Bontea, Adriana. “Montaigne’s On Physiognomy.” Renaissance Studies, 22, no. 1 (2008): 4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, Karel G.Frans Crabbe en de Monogrammist A.C.” In De Gulden Passer 52. Antwerp: Nederlandse Boekhandel, 1974.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst. “A Neglected Tradition? Art History as Bildwissenschaft.” Critical Inquiry 29, no. 3 (2003): 418–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst. The Technical Image: A History of Styles in Scientific Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst and Schneider, Pablo. Visuelle Argumentationen: die Mysterien der Reprasentation und die Berechenbarkeit der Welt. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2006.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst, Dünkel, Vera, and Schneider, Birgit. Das Technische Bild: Kompendium zu einer Stilgeschichte wissenschaftlicher Bilder. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Britton, Piers D. G.The Signs of Faces: Leonardo on Physiognomic Science and the ‘Four Universal States of Man.’” Renaissance Studies 16, no. 2 (2002): 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosseder, Claudia. Im Bann der Sterne: Caspar Peucer, Philipp Melanchthon und andere Wittenberger Astrologen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosseder, Claudia. “The Writing in the Wittenberg Sky: Astrology in Sixteenth-Century Germany.” Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (2005): 557–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Thomas. Religio medici. Ed. Denonian, Jean-Jacques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Brunner, Horst, Löser, Freimut, and Klein, Dorothea, eds. Überlieferungsgeschichte transdisziplinär: neue Perspektiven auf ein germanistisches Forschungsparadigma. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Buck, Stephanie et al. Holbein, 1497–1543. Cologne: Könemann, 1999.Google Scholar
Buren, Anne H. van and Edmunds, Sheila. “Playing Cards and Manuscripts: Some Widely Disseminated Fifteenth-Century Model Sheets.” Art Bulletin 56, no. 1 (1974): 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Paperbacks, 2008.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Johannes and Häberlein, Mark, eds. Die Welser: Neue Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kultur des oberdeutschen Handelshauses. Berlin: Akademie, 2002.Google Scholar
Cashion, Debra Taylor, Luttikhuizen, Henry, and West, Ashley D., eds. The Primacy of the Image in Northern European Art, 1400–1700: Essays in Honor of Larry Silver. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Catteneo, Angelo. “Map Projections and Perspective in the Renaissance.” In Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds., Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar
Challenger, Alexandra. “Printing the Cosmos: Images, Readers, and Mathematics in Peter Apian’s Instrumental Texts.” PhD dissertation, Florida State University, 2022.Google Scholar
Chojecka, Ewa. Bayerische Bild-Enzyklopädie: das Weltbild eines wissenschaftlich-magischen Hausbuches aus dem frühen 16. Jahrhundert. Studien zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte, vol. 358. Baden-Baden: Verlag Valentin Koerner, 1982.Google Scholar
Chojecka, Ewa. “Zur Stellung des gedruckten Bildes im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert: Zwischen Kunstwerk und ‘Massenmedium.’” In Reform, Reformation, Revolution: Ausgewählte Beiträge einer wissenschaftlichen Konferenz in Leipzig am 10. und 11. Oktober 1977. Leipzig: Karl Marx Universität, 1980.Google Scholar
Chrisman, Miriam Usher. Lay Culture, Learned Culture: Books and Social Change in Strasbourg, 1480–1599. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Clayton, Martin. Leonardo da Vinci: The Divine and the Grotesque. London: Royal Collection, 2002.Google Scholar
Clayton, Martin. “Leonardo’s Gypsies, and the Wolf and the Eagle.” Apollo 155, no. 486 (2002): 2733.Google Scholar
Clement, Taylor. “Moveable Types: The De-individuated Portrait in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Renaissance Studies 31, no. 3 (2017): 383406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clod, Random. “Information on Information.” Text 5 (1991): 241–78.Google Scholar
Clough, Cecil. “Italian Renaissance Portraits and Printed Portrait Books.” In Reidy, Dennis V., ed., The Italian Book 1465–1800: Studies Presented to Dennis E. Rhodes on His 70th Birthday. London: British Library, 1993.Google Scholar
Colding Smith, Charlotte. Images of Islam, 1453–1600: Turks in Germany and Central Europe. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2014.Google Scholar
Coldiron, A. E. B. Printers Without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coldiron, A. E. B.Translation and Transformission; Or, Early Modernity in Motion.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 46, no. 2 (2019): 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comisso, Giovanni, ed. Gli ambasciatori veneti, 1525–1792. Relazion di viaggio e di missione. Milan: Longanesi, 1985.Google Scholar
Conley, Tom. An Errant Eye: Poetry and Topography in Early Modern France. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, Tom. The Self-Made Map: Cartographic Writing in Early Modern France. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Conley, Tom. “A Topographer’s Eye: From Gilles Corrozet to Pieter Apian.” In Melion, Walter S. and Wandel, Lee Palmer, eds., Early Modern Eyes. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Corbellini, Sabrina, Murano, Giovanna, and Signore, Giacomo. Collecting, Organizing and Transmitting Knowledge: Miscellanies in Late Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2018.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Denis E. Apollo’s Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, Denis E.Images of Renaissance Cosmography.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Denis E. ed. Mappings. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Crisci, Edoardo and Pecere, Oronzo. Il codice miscellaneo: tipologie e funzioni: atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino 14–17 maggio 2003. Cassino: University of Cassino, 2004.Google Scholar
Crowther, Kathleen M. and Barker, Peter. “Training the Intelligent Eye: Understanding Illustrations in Early Modern Astronomy Texts.” Isis 104, no. 3 (2013): 429–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowther, Kathleen M., McCray, Ashley Nicole, McNeill, Leila, Rodgers, Amy, and Stein, Blair. “The Book Everybody Read: Vernacular Translations of Sacrobosco’s Sphere in the Sixteenth Century.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 46, no. 1 (2015): 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuneo, Pia F.Just a Bit of Control: The Historical Significance of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century German Bit-Books.” In Raber, Karen, Tucker, Treva J., and Cuneo, Pia F., The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Pia F. and Stewart, Alison G., eds. Animals and Early Modern Identity. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew and Kusukawa, Sachiko. Natural Philosophy Epitomised: A Translation of Books 8–11 of Gregor Reisch’s Philosophical Pearl (1503). Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Dackerman, Susan. Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA and New Haven, CT: Harvard Art Museums, 2011.Google Scholar
Damm, Heiko, Thimann, Michael, and Zittel, Claus, eds. The Artist as Reader: On Education and Non-Education of Early Modern Artists. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “Epistemic Images.” In Payne, Alina Alexandra, Vision and Its Instruments: Art, Science, and Technology in Early Modern Europe. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “On Scientific Observation.” Isis 99, no. 1 (2008): 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Vidal, Fernando. The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter Robert. Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge in Transition, 1500–1700. Oxford and London: Macmillan International Higher Education and Red Globe Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Dekker, Elly and Schmidt, Rudolf. “The Globes in Holbein’s Painting ‘The Ambassadors.’Der Globusfreund: Bericht über das IX. Symposium der Internationalen Coronelli-Gesellschaft, Berlin, 3.–7. Oktober 1998 47–8 (1999): 1952.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October (1992): 3–7.Google Scholar
Denucé, Jean. De Antwerpsche “Konstkamers”: Inventarissen van Kunstverzamelingen te Antwerpen in de 16e en 17e Eeuwen. Antwerp: De Sikkel, 1932.Google Scholar
Depuydt, Joost. “The Utopia Map by Abraham Ortelius: New Home – New Research.” De Gulden Passer: Tijdschrift voor Boek Wetenschap 97, no. 2 (2019): 242–6.Google Scholar
Desan, Philippe, ed. Humanism in Crisis: The Decline of the French Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodgson, Campbell. “Die Cäsarenköpfe, eine unbeschriebene Folge von Holzschnitten Hans Burgkmair d. Ä.” In Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Kunst, Bd. II. Augsburg: Benno Filser, 1928.Google Scholar
Draxler, Sonja and Lippitsch, Max E.. “Peter Apian and His Astronomicum Caesareum.” In Proceedings of the 2nd European History of Physics (EHoP) Conference. Pöllauberg: Living Edition, 2012.Google Scholar
Dupré, Sven, ed. Perspective as Practice: Renaissance Cultures of Optics. Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, Sven, “Printing Practical Mathematics: Oronce Fine’s De speculo ustorio between Paper and Craft.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar
Dupré, Sven, “Trading Luxury Glass, Picturing Collections and Consuming Objects of Knowledge in Early Seventeenth-Century Antwerp.” Intellectual History Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, Sven and Lüth, Christophery, eds. Silent Messengers: The Circulation of Material Objects of Knowledge in the Early Modern Low Countries. Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Dürer, Albrecht. The Painter’s Manual: A Manual of Measurement of Lines, Areas, and Solids by Means of Compass and Ruler Assembled by Albrecht Dürer for the Use of All Lovers of Art with Appropriate Illustrations Arranged to Be Printed in the Year MDXXV. The Literary Remains of Albrecht Dürer. New York: Abaris Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Dürer, Albrecht and Rupprich, Hans. Schriftlicher Nachlaß, vol. 2. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1966.Google Scholar
Dürer, Albrecht, Hess, Daniel, and Eser, Thomas. Der frühe Dürer. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 2012.Google Scholar
Dürer, Albrecht, Fuhse, Franz Louis, and Lange, Konrad. Dürers schriftlicher Nachlass auf Grund der Originalhandschriften und theilweise neu entdeckter alter Abschriften. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer, 1893.Google Scholar
Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Elkins, Jim. Visual Literacy. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Ellenbogen, Josh and Jolles, Adam. “Visual Literacy and 1960s Photography.” Critical Inquiry Critical Inquiry 47, no. 3 (2021): 565–91.Google Scholar
Emison, Patricia A.Prolegomenon to the Study of Italian Renaissance Prints.” Word & Image 11, no. 1 (1995): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enenkel, K. A. E. and Neuber, Wolfgang, eds. Cognition and the Book: Typologies of Formal Organisation of Knowledge in the Printed Book of the Early Modern Period. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Engammare, Max. Calendrier des bergers. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2008.Google Scholar
Eser, Thomas. “Ordnende Dinge in unordentlichen Zeiten die ‘kulturelle Gelegenheit’ des 16. Jahrhunderts.” In Eser, Thomas and Armer, Stephanie, eds., Luther, Kolumbus und die Folgen: Welt im Wandel 1500–1600. Nuremberg: Germanisches Nationalmuseum, 2017.Google Scholar
Eser, Thomas. Schiefe Bilder – die Zimmernsche Anamorphose und andere Augenspiele aus den Sammlungen des Germanischen Nationalmuseums. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 1998.Google Scholar
Falk, Tilman, Lübbeke, Isolde, and Biedermann, Rolf. Hans Burgkmair: 1473–1973: Das Graphische Werk. Augsburg: Städtische Kunstsammlungen, 1973.Google Scholar
Farago, Claire J. Reframing the Renaissance: Visual Culture in Europe and Latin America, 1450–1650. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Farago, Claire J., Bell, Janis Callen, Vecce, Carlo, and Kemp, Martin. The Fabrication of Leonardo da Vinci’s Trattato della Pittura, with a Scholarly Edition of the Editio Princeps (1651) and an Annotated English Translation. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Ferckel, Christian. “Eine Bilderhandschrift v. J. 1524.” Mitteilungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 12. Leipzig and Hamburg: Leopold Voss Verlag, 1913.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Michele C. Le monde en images: Deux encyclopédies manuscrites à Erlangen et à Cracovie. Art de l’enluminure 76. Dijon: Éditions Faton, 2021.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel et al. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Fransen, Sietske. “Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, His Images and Draughtsmen.” Perspectives on Science 27, no. 3 (2019): 485544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedberg, David. The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, His Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedländer, M.Nicolas Hogenberg und Frans Crabbe die Maler von Mechelen.” Jahrbuch der Preuszischen Kunstsammlungen 42, no. 4 (1921): 161–8.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Michael and Schwarke, Cosima. One-Volume Libraries: Composite and Multiple-Text Manuscripts. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funke, Jutta. “Beiträge zum graphischen Werk Heinrich Vogtherrs d.Ä.” Dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin, 1967.Google Scholar
Gagel, Hanna, ed., Der Mensch um 1500: Werke aus Kirchen und Kunstkammern, 2nd edition. Berlin: Felgentreff & Goebel, 1977.Google Scholar
Gaida, Margaret. “Reading Cosmographia: Peter Apian’s Book-Instrument Hybrid and the Rise of the Mathematical Amateur in the Sixteenth Century.” Early Science and Medicine 21, no. 4 (2016): 277302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gastel, Joris van, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds. Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Michael. The Bible and the Printed Image in Early Modern England: Little Gidding and the Pursuit of Scriptural Harmony. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudio, Michael. Engraving the Savage: The New World and Techniques of Civilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Laura Deborah and Blick, Sarah, eds. Push Me, Pull You: Physical and Spatial Interaction in Late Medieval and Renaissance Art. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Gessner, Samuel. “The Perspective of the Instrument Maker: The Planispheric Projection with Gemma Frisius and the Arsenius Workshop at Louvain.” In Dupré, Sven, ed., Perspective as Practice: Renaissance Cultures of Optics. Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.Google Scholar
Gessner, Samuel. “The Use of Printed Images for Instrument-Making at the Arsenius Workshop.” In Jardine, Nicholas and Fay, Isla, Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Sciences. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. “Astronomical Paper Instruments with Moving Parts.” In Anderson, Robert, Bennett, Jim, and Ryan, W. F., eds., Making Instruments Count: Essays on Historical Scientific Instruments Presented to Gerard L’Estrange Turner. Aldershot: Variorum, 1993.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. “Sacrobosco as a Textbook.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 19, no. 4 (1988): 269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Andrew and Klein, Bernhard. Literature, Mapping, and the Politics of Space in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Commerce with the Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. “Some Uses of Eclipses in Early Modern Chronology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 64, no. 2 (2003): 213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jonathan. Printing and Prophecy: Prognostication and Media Change 1450–1550. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen Jay. Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Melanie, Kleine-Tebbe, Claudia, and Stijnman, Ad. Lichtspiel und Farbenpracht: Entwicklungen des Farbdrucks 1500–1800: aus den Beständen der Herzog-August-Bibliothek. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011.Google Scholar
Groebner, Valentin. “Complexio/Complexion: Categorizing Individual Natures, 1250–1600.” In Daston, Lorraine and Vidal, Fernando, The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Grotefend, H. Christian Egenolff der erste ständige Buchdrucker zu Frankfurt a. M. Frankfurt: K. T. Völcker’s Verlag, 1881.Google Scholar
Haag, Sabine et al., eds. Die Kunstkammer: die Schätze der Habsburger. Vienna: Brandstätter Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Hall, Bert S.Der Meister sol auch kennen schreiben und lesen: Writings about Technology ca. 1400–ca. 1600 AD and Their Cultural Implication.” In Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, Early Technologies. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
Hamel, Jürgen. Studien zur “Sphaera” des Johannes de Sacrobosco. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt, 2014.Google Scholar
Hardman, Phillipa and Bradbury, Nicola. Medieval and Early Modern Miscellanies and Anthologies.The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 33. Leeds: Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association, 2003.Google Scholar
Haskell, Francis. History and Its Images: Art and the Interpretation of the Past. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hayton, Darin. The Crown and the Cosmos. Astrology and the Politics of Maximilian I. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesen, Anke te. The World in a Box: The Story of an Eighteenth-Century Picture Encyclopedia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Heitzmann, Christian. Die Sterne Lügen Nicht: Astrologie und Astronomie im Mittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2008.Google Scholar
Henry, Chriscinda. “Leonardo da Vinci, Parody, and Pictorial Magic.” In Levy, Allison M., ed., Playthings in Early Modernity: Party Games, Word Games, Mind Games. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 2017.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.Der Astrolog Johannes Indagine, Pfarrer zu Steinheim a.M., und die Frankfurter Kaiserwahl des Jahres 1519.” Archiv für Hessische Geschichte und Alterthumskunde 18 (1934): 274–91.Google Scholar
Hindman, Sandra. The Early Illustrated Book Essays in Honor of Lessing Julius Rosenwald. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1982.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Werner. Köpfe der Lutherzeit. Munich: Prestel, 1983.Google Scholar
Holländer, Hans, ed. Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik von 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 2000.Google Scholar
Hollstein, F. W. H. et al. Hollstein’s German Engravings Etchings and Woodcuts 1400–1700, vol. 30. Amsterdam: M. Hertzberger, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoogstede, Luuk et al. Hieronymus Bosch, Painter and Draughtsman: Technical Studies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, ed. The Cambridge Concise History of Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ivins, William Mills. Prints and Visual Communication. New York: Da Capo Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas and Fay, Isla. Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Sciences. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaumann, Herbert. Handbuch Gelehrtenkultur der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian. “The Uses of Print in the History of Science.” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 107, no. 4 (2013): 393420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Christine R. The German Discovery of the World: Renaissance Encounters with the Strange and Marvelous. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Johnston, Sky Michael. “Printing the Weather: Knowledge, Nature, and Popular Culture in Two Sixteenth-Century German Weather Books.” Renaissance Quarterly 73, no. 2 (2020): 391440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Alexander. Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of His Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. “Art – A User’s Guide: Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance.” PhD dissertation, Yale University, 2006.Google Scholar
Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. “Memento Mori: The Deadly Art of Interaction.” In Gelfand, Laura Deborah and Blick, Sarah, eds., Push Me, Pull You: Imaginative and Emotional Interaction in Late Medieval and Renaissance Art. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Karr Schmidt, Suzanne and Nichols, Kimberly. Altered and Adorned: Using Renaissance Prints in Daily Life. Chicago and New Haven, CT: Art Institute of Chicago, distributed by Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen and Wouk, Edward H.. Prints in Translation, 1450–1750: Image, Materiality, Space. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Kaune, Daniel. “Vom Grenzstein zum Augenschein: von der Essenz und Relevanz eines Kartentypus.” BA/MA thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, Hannover, n.d.Google Scholar
Kemp, Martin. “Temples of the Body and Temples of the Cosmos: Vision and Visualization in the Vesalian and Copernican Revolutions.” In Baigrie, Brian Scott, ed., Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kinsman, Robert Starr. The Darker Vision of the Renaissance: Beyond the Fields of Reason. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsman, Robert Starr. “Folly, Melancholy, and Madness: A Study in the Shifting Styles of Medical Analysis and Treatment, 1450–1675.” In Kinsman, Robert Starr, The Darker Vision of the Renaissance: Beyond the Fields of Reason. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alice. “Hans Wechtlin and the Production of German Colour Woodcuts.” In Stijnman, Ad and Savage, Elizabeth, eds., Printing Colour 1400–1700: History, Techniques, Functions and Receptions. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Klein, Alice. “Hans Wechtlin, peintre à Strasbourg à la veille de la Réforme.” PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2014.Google Scholar
Klein, M.Les Physiognomistes haut-rhénans du XVIe siècle.” In Atti del XIV Congresso internazionale di storia della medicina sotto l’Alto Patronato del Presidente della Repubblica, Roma – Salerno, 13–20 settembre 1954. Rome: Guerra & Belli, 1960.Google Scholar
Klibansky, Raymond, Panofsky, Erwin, and Saxl, Fritz. Saturn and Melancholy: Studies in the History of Natural Philosophy, Religion, and Art. New York: Basic Books, 1964.Google Scholar
Klinger Aleci, Linda. “Images of Identity: Italian Portrait Collections of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In Mann, Nicholas and Syson, Luke, eds., The Image of the Individual: Portraits in the Renaissance. London: British Museum Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Klinger, Linda Susan. The Portrait Collection of Paolo Giovio. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services, 2003.Google Scholar
Koerner, Joseph Leo. The Moment of Self-Portraiture in German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kohl, Jeanette and Olariu, Dominic. “En face: seven essays on the human face.” In Kritische Berichte: Zeitschrift für Kunst- und Kulturwissenschaften 40. Marburg: Jonas Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Korner, Hans. Der früheste deutsche Einblattholzschnitt. Munich: Mäander Kunstverlag, 1979.Google Scholar
Kremer, Richard L.Incunable Almanacs and Practica as Practical Knowledge Produced in Trading Zones.” In Valleriani, Matteo, ed., The Structures of Practical Knowledge. Cham: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Kremer, Richard L.Playing with Geometrical Tools: Johannes Stabius’s Astrolabium Imperatorium (1515) and Its Successors.” CNT Centaurus 58, nos. 1–2 (2016): 104–34.Google Scholar
Kruyfhooft, Cécile. “A Recent Discovery: Utopia by Abraham Ortelius.” Map Collector 16 (1981): 1014.Google Scholar
Küchler, Susanne and Melion, Walter S.. Images of Memory: On Remembering and Representation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kuhoff, Wolfgang. “Markus Welser als Erforscher des römischen Augsburg.” In Burkhardt, Johannes and Häberlein, Mark, eds., Die Welser: Neue Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kultur des oberdeutschen Handelshauses. Berlin: Akademie, 2002.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. “Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58, no. 3 (1997): 403–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusukawa, Sachiko. Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko and Maclean, Ian. Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images, and Instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kwakkelstein, Michael W. Leonardo da Vinci as a Physiognomist: Theory and Drawing Practice. Leiden: Primavers Pers, 2014.Google Scholar
Kwakkelstein, Michael W.Leonardo da Vinci’s Recurrent Use of Patterns of Individual Limbs, Stock Poses and Facial Stereotypes.” In Ciulisova, I., ed., Artistic Innovations and Cultural Zones. Spectrum Slovakia 7. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2015.Google Scholar
Kwakkelstein, Michael W.The Lost Book on ‘Moti Mentali.’” In Farago, Claire J., Leonardo’s Writings and Theory of Art. New York: Garland, 1999.Google Scholar
Landau, David and Parshall, Peter W.. The Renaissance Print, 1470–1550. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lattis, James M. “Christopher Clavius and the ‘Sphere’ of Sacrobosco: The Roots of Jesuit Astronomy on the Eve of the Copernican Revolution.” PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1989.Google Scholar
Laube, Reinhard and Zäh, Helmut, eds. Gesammeltes Gedächtnis: Konrad Peutinger und die kulturelle Überlieferung im 16. Jahrhundert. Lucerne: Quaternio Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Wolfgang, ed. Picturing Machines, 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibsohn, Dana and Peterson, Jeanette Favrot, eds. Seeing across Cultures in the Early Modern World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Leitch, Stephanie. “Dürer’s Rhinoceros Underway: The Epistemology of the Copy in the Early Modern Print.” In Cashion, Debra Taylor, Luttikhuizen, Henry, and West, Ashley D., eds., The Primacy of the Image in Northern European Art, 1400–1700: Essays in Honor of Larry Silver. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Leitch, Stephanie. Mapping Ethnography in Early Modern Germany: New Worlds in Print Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, Stephanie. “Visual Acuity and the Physiognomer’s Art of Observation.” Oxford Art Journal 38, no. 2 (2015): 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, Toby. The Fourth Part of the World: An Astonishing Epic of Global Discovery, Imperial Ambition and the Birth of America. New York: Free Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lestringant, Frank. “The Crisis of Cosmography at the End of the Renaissance.” In Desan, Philippe, ed., Humanism in Crisis: The Decline of the French Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Levy, Allison M., ed. Playthings in Early Modernity: Party Games, Word Games, Mind Games. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, David Charles. “Alhazen’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception in the West.” Isis 58, no. 3 (1967): 321–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loh, Maria H.Renaissance Faciality.” Oxford Art Journal 32, no. 3 (2009): 341–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Pamela O., McGee, David, and Stahl, Alan M., eds. The Book of Michael of Rhodes: A Fifteenth-Century Maritime Manuscript. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lowe, Dunstan. “Suspending Disbelief Magnetic and Miraculous Levitation from Antiquity to the Middle Ages.” Classical Antiquity 35, no. 2 (2016): 247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, Martin and de Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht. Dr. Martin Luthers Briefe, Sendschreiben und Bedenken … Gesammelt, Kritisch und Historisch Bearbeitet von Dr W. M. L. de Wette. Berlin: Reimer, 1825.Google Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph and Smets, Alexis. “Words, Lines, Diagrams, Images: Towards a History of Scientific Imagery.” Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 398439.Google Scholar
Lutze, Eberhard. Die Bilderhandschriften der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1971.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Katherine. “Humanistic Self-Representation in Giovan Battista Della Porta’s ‘Della Fisonomia dell’Uomo’: Antecedents and Innovation.” Sixteenth Century Journal 36, no. 2 (2005): 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machilek, Franz. “Astronomie und Astrologie: Sternforschung und Sternglaube im Verständnis von Johannes Regiomontanus und Benedikt Ellwanger.” Astronomie und Astrologie in der Frühen Neuzeit: Akten des Interdisziplinären Symposions 21, no. 22 (1990): 1132.Google Scholar
Maier, Jessica. Rome Measured and Imagined: Early Modern Maps of the Eternal City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maniaci, Marilena. “Miscellaneous Reflections on the Complexity of the Medieval Manuscripts.” In Corbellini, Sabrina, Murano, Giovanna, and Signore, Giacomo, Collecting, Organizing and Transmitting Knowledge: Miscellanies in Late Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2018.Google Scholar
Mann, Heinz Herbert. “Optische Instrumente.” In Holländer, Hans, ed., Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik von 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 2000.Google Scholar
Marr, Alexander. “Copying, Commonplaces and Technical Knowledge: The Architect-Engineer as Reader.” In Damm, Heiko, Thimann, Michael, and Zittel, Claus, eds., The Artist as Reader: On Education and Non-Education of Early Modern Artists. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Marr, Alexander. “Ingenuity in Nuremberg: Dürer and Stabius’s Instrument Prints.” Art Bulletin 100, no. 3 (2018): 4879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, Alexander. “Knowing Images: A Review Essay.” Renaissance Quarterly 69, no. 3 (2016): 1000–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, Alexander. “Walther Ryff, Plagiarism and Imitation in Sixteenth Century Germany.” Print Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2014): 131–43.Google Scholar
Marr, Alexander. ed. The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar
Marr, Alexander and Heuer, Christopher P. “Introduction: The Uncertainty of Epistemic Images.” 21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual 1, no. 2 (2020): 251–5.Google Scholar
Massey, Lyle. Picturing Space, Displacing Bodies: Anamorphosis in Early Modern Theories of Perspective. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
McDonald, Mark P. The Paper Museum of Cassiano dal Pozzo: A Catalogue Raisonné: Drawings and Prints in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle, the British Museum, the Institut de France and Others Collections. Series C – Prints Part One: Ceremonies, Costumes, Portraits and Genre. London: Harvey Miller, 2017.Google Scholar
McDonald, Mark P. The Print Collection of Ferdinand Columbus: 1488–1539: A Renaissance Collector in Seville. London: British Museum Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Melion, Walter and Wandel, Lee Palmer, eds. Early Modern Eyes. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merback, Mitchell B. Perfection’s Therapy: An Essay on Albrecht Dürer’s Melencolia I. New York: Zone Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Merback, Mitchell B.Recognitions: Theme and Metatheme in Hans Burgkmair the Elder’s Santa Croce in Gerusalemme of 1504.” Art Bulletin 96, no. 3 (2014): 288318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Sabine, Purpus, Elke, and Schneider, Cornelia. Blockbücher des Mittelalters: Bilderfolgen als Lektüre: Gutenberg-Museum, Mainz, 22. Juni 1991 bis 1. September 1991. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern, 1991.Google Scholar
Metzger, Christoph. “‘Wie man den Menschen erkennen soll’: Neue Überlegungen zu den Charakterstudien Hans Schäufelins, mit einem Technologischen Anhang von Monika Strolz.” Jahrbuch des Kunsthistorischen Museums Wien 12 (2010): 839.Google Scholar
Meurer, Peter. “Cartography in the German Lands, 1450–1650.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Miller, Clarence et al. Utopia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. Thomas. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Montaigne, . The Essays of Michel de Montaigne. Trans. and ed. Screech, M. A.. London: Allen Lane, 1991.Google Scholar
Morrison, James E. The Astrolabe. Rehoboth Beach, DE: Janus, 2007.Google Scholar
Mosley, Adam. “The Cosmographer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study.” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 59 (2009): 424–39.Google Scholar
Mosley, Adam. “Early Modern Cosmography: Fine’s Sphaera Mundi in Content and Context.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann. “Locating Knowledge.” In Enenkel, K. A. E. and Neuber, Wolfgang, eds., Cognition and the Book: Typologies of Formal Organisation of Knowledge in the Printed Book of the Early Modern Period. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Müller, Christian et al. Dürer, Holbein, Grünewald: Meisterzeichnungen der Deutschen Renaissance aus Berlin und Basel. Basel and Berlin: Offentliche Kunstsammlung, Staatlichen Museen, and Preussischer Kulturbesitz, 1997.Google Scholar
Müller, Christian Hans Holbein the Younger: The Basel Years, 1515–1532. Munich: Prestel, 2006.Google Scholar
Muller, Frank. Heinrich Vogtherr l’Ancien: un artiste entre Renaissance et Réforme. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1997.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Dirk. “Evidentia und Medialität. Zur Ausdifferenzierung von Evidenz in der Frühen-Neuzeit.” In Wimböck, Gabriele et al., eds., Evidentia. Reichweiten visueller Wahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Müller-Jahncke, Wolf Dieter. “Melanchton und die Astrologie: Theoretisches und Mantisches.” In Günter, Frank and Rhein, Stefan, eds., Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften Seiner Zeit. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, 1998.Google Scholar
Mundy, Barbara E. The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps of the Relaciones Geográficas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Münkner, Jörn. Eingreifen und Begreifen: Handhabungen und Visualisierungen in Flugblättern der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2008.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jennifer. “Directed Leering: Social Perspective in Erhard Schön’s Anamorphic Woodcuts.” Source: Notes in the History of Art 34, no. 4 (2015): 1722.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jennifer. Disharmony of the Spheres: The Europe of Holbein’s Ambassadors. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 2019.Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen G. and Wenzel, Siegfried. The Whole Book: Cultural Perspectives on the Medieval Miscellany. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, John David. The Ambassadors’ Secret: Holbein and the World of the Renaissance. London: Phoenix, 2004.Google Scholar
Noyes, Ruth S.Mattheus Greuter’s Sunspot Etchings for Galileo Galilei’s Macchie Solari (1613).” Art Bulletin 98, no. 4 (2016): 466–87.Google Scholar
Noyes, Ruth S. ed. Reassessing Epistemic Images in the Early Modern World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Nuti, Lucia. “Mapping Places: Chorography and Vision in the Renaissance.” In Cosgrove, Denis E., ed., Mappings. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Brian W. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olariu, Dominic. “Herbs under Pressure: Plant Illustrations and Nature Printing in the First Half of the Fifteenth Century.” In Felfe, Robert and Saß, Maurice, Naturalismen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Olariu, Dominic. The Misfortune of Philippus de Lignamine’s Herbal or New Research Perspectives in Herbal Illustrations from an Iconological Point of View. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2015.Google Scholar
Oldenbourg, Maria C. Die Buchholzschnitte des Hans Baldung Grien: Ein Bibliographisches Verzeichnis ihrer Verwendungen. Baden-Baden: Verlag Heitz, 1962.Google Scholar
Olson, Todd. “Markers: Le Moyne de Morgues in Sixteenth-Century Florida.” In Leibsohn, Dana and Peterson, Jeanette Favrot, eds., Seeing across Cultures in the Early Modern World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, Richard J.A Book, a Pen, and the Sphere: Reading Sacrobosco in the Renaissance.” History of Universities 28, no. 2 (2015): 154.Google Scholar
Ortroy, Fernand van. Bibliographie de l’oeuvre de Pierre Apian. Amsterdam: Meridian, 1963.Google Scholar
Padron, Riccardo. “Mapping Imaginary Worlds.” In Ackerman, James et al., eds., Maps: Finding Our Place in the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Life and Art of Albrecht Dürer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995 [1943].Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. Trans. Christopher S. Wood. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Panse, Melanie. Hans von Gersdorffs “Feldbuch der Wundarznei”: Produktion, Präsentation und Rezeption von Wissen. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Katherine. “Observation in the Margins, 500–1500.” In Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Parker, K. T. The Drawings of Hans Holbein in the Collection of His Majesty the King at Windsor Castle. Oxford: Phaidon Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter.The Art of Memory and the Passion.” Art Bulletin 81 (1999): 456–72.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter.Graphic Knowledge: Albrecht Dürer and the Imagination.” Art Bulletin 95, no. 3 (2013): 395410.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter.Imago Contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance.” Art History 16, no. 4 (1993): 554–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parshall, Peter.Prints as Objects of Consumption in Early Modern Europe.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 28, no. 1 (1998): 1936.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter. “The Print Collection of Ferdinand, Archduke of Tyrol.” Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien (1982): 139–90.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter and Landau, David. The Renaissance Print 1470–1550. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Parshall, Peter and Schoch, Rainer. Origins of European Printmaking: Fifteenth-Century Woodcuts and Their Public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Payne, Alina Alexandra. Vision and Its Instruments: Art, Science, and Technology in Early Modern Europe. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pericolo, Lorenzo. “Knowing through the Eye: Leonardo da Vinci’s Imprensiva and Alhazen’s Intuitio.” Römisches Jahrbuch der Bibliotheca Hertziana 44 (2019–20): 205–61.Google Scholar
Perkinson, Stephen. “From an ‘Art de Memoire’ to the Art of Portraiture: Printed Effigy Books of the Sixteenth Century.” Sixteenth Century Journal 33, no. 3 (2002): 687723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkinson, Stephen. “Likeness.” Studies in Iconography 33 (2012): 1528.Google Scholar
Perkinson, Stephen. The Likeness of the King: A Prehistory of Portraiture in Late Medieval France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkinson, Stephen. “Portraits and Counterfeits: Villard de Honnecourt and Thirteenth-Century Theories of Representation.” In Areford, David S. and Rowe, Nina A., eds., Excavating the Medieval Image. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Pfisterer, Ulrich. “Apelles im Norden: Ausnahme Künstler, Selbstbildnisse und die Gunst der Mächtigen um 1500.” In Müller, Matthias, ed., Apelles am Fürstenhof. Berlin: Coburger Landesstiftung, 2010.Google Scholar
Pinto, John A.Origins and Development of the Ichnographic City Plan.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 35, no. 1 (1976): 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, 1500–1650.” In Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Pon, Lisa. A Printed Icon: Forlì’s Madonna of the Fire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popplow, Marcus. “Why Draw Pictures of Machines?: The Social Contexts of Early Modern Machine Drawings.” In Lefèvre, Wolfgang, ed., Picturing Machines, 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Porras, Stephanie. “‘Ein freie hant’: Autonomy, Drawing and the Young Dürer.” In Dürer, Albrecht, Hess, Daniel, and Eser, Thomas, Der frühe Dürer. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 2012.Google Scholar
Porter, Martin. Windows of the Soul Physiognomy in European Culture 1470–1780. Oxford: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, David. In the Beginning Was the Image: Art and the Reformation Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Ptolemaeus, Claudius. Ptolemy’s Geography: An Annotated Translation of the Theoretical Chapters. Ed. Berggren, John L. and Jones, Alexander. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicchelberg, Samuel, Meadow, Mark A., and Robertson, Bruce. The First Treatise on Museums: Samuel Quiccheberg’s Inscriptiones, 1565. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2013.Google Scholar
Raber, Karen, Tucker, Treva J., and Cuneo, Pia F.. The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, Ayesha. The Worldmakers: Global Imagining in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rath, Markus. “Manipulation: Modellformung, Bildrelief und kubische Denkfigur als Moment des Mitstreits.” In Gastel, Joris van, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds., Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar
Reeves, Eileen. Painting the Heavens: Art and Science in the Age of Galileo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Reidy, Dennis V., ed. The Italian Book 1465–1800: Studies Presented to Dennis E. Rhodes on His 70th Birthday. London: British Library, 1993.Google Scholar
Reisser, Ulrich. “Physiognomik und Ausdruckstheorie der Renaissance: der Einfluss charakterologischer Lehren auf Kunst und Kunsttheorie des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts.Munich: Scaneg, 1997.Google Scholar
Remmert, Volker R. Picturing the Scientific Revolution. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Remond, Jaya. “Artful Instruction: Pictorializing and Printing Artistic Knowledge in Early Modern Germany.” Word & Image 36, no. 2 (2020): 101–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remond, Jaya. “Bodies of Knowledge: Movement, Variety and Imagination in a German Renaissance Art Primer.” In Beyer, Andreas and Cassegrain, Guillaume, eds., Mouvement. Bewegung. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Remond, Jaya. “The Kunstbüchlein: Printed Artists’ Manuals and the Transmission of Craft in Renaissance Germany.” PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 2014.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Neil and Sawday, Jonathan. The Renaissance Computer: Knowledge Technology in the First Age of Print. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Richter Sherman, Claire et al. Writing on Hands: Memory and Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Riello, Giorgio. “The World in a Book: The Creation of the Global in Sixteenth-Century European Costume Books.” Past & Present 242, no. 14 (2019): 281317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, François. Histoire de l’imprimerie alsacienne aux 15e et 16e siècles. Strasbourg: Institut des Hautes Études Alsaciennes, 1955.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jane et al. Drawings by Holbein from the Court of Henry VIII: Fifty Drawings from the Collection of Her Majesty the Queen, Windsor Castle. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988.Google Scholar
Ronsin, Albert, Monat, Pierre, and Vespucci, Amerigo. La fortune d’un nom: America: le baptême du Nouveau Monde à Saint-Dié-des-Vosges. Grenoble: J. Millon, 1991.Google Scholar
Roper, Lyndal. “‘The Common Man’, ‘The Common Good’, ‘Common Women’: Gender and Meaning in the German Reformation Commune.” In Wiesner, Merry E., Women and Gender in the Early Modern World: Critical Concepts in Women’s History. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Rosen, Edward. Copernicus and His Successors. London: Hambledon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Roth, Michael et al. Dürers Mutter: Schönheit, Alter und Tod im Bild der Renaissance. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and Nicolai, 2006.Google Scholar
Röttel, Karl. Peter Apian: Astronomie, Kosmographie und Mathematik am Beginn der Neuzeit: Mit Ausstellungskatalog. Buxheim: Polygon-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Röttinger, Heinrich. “Hans Wechtlin.” Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlung der Allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses 27 (1907–9).Google Scholar
Röttinger, Heinrich. “Die Holzschnitte der Druckerei des Jakob Cammerlander in Straßburg.” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 11 (1936): 125–40.Google Scholar
Rubiés, Joan-Pau. “Instructions for Travellers: Teaching the Eye to See.” In Rubiés, Joan-Pau, Travellers and Cosmographers: Studies in the History of Early Modern Travel and Ethnology. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Pia. “Hausbücher. Bayerische Bild-Enzyklopädien.” In Bodemann, Ulrike et al. (eds.), Katalog der deutschsprachigen illustrierten Handschriften des Mittelalters (KdiH). Munich: C. H. Beck, 2015.Google Scholar
Rudy, Kathryn M. Rubrics, Images and Indulgences in Late Medieval Netherlandish Manuscripts. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupprich, Hans and Dürer, Albrecht. Schriftlicher Nachlass, vol. 1. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1956.Google Scholar
Ryan, W. F. and Schmitt, Charles B.. Pseudo-Aristotle, the Secret of Secrets: Sources and Influences. London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1982.Google Scholar
Sacré, Dirk, de Bom, Erik, Verbeke, Demmy, and Tournoy, Gilbert. Utopia & More: Thomas More, de Nederlanden en de utopische traditie: catalogus bij de tentoonstelling in de Leuvense Universiteitsbibliotheek, 20 oktober 2016–17 januari 2017. Louvain: Leuven University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
San Juan, Rose Marie. Vertiginous Mirrors: The Animation of the Visual Image and Early Modern Travel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sarton, George. The Appreciation of Ancient and Medieval Science during the Renaissance (1450–1600). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauter, Michael J. The Spatial Reformation: Euclid between Man, Cosmos, and God. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawday, Jonathan. The Machine Mind: Technology and Culture in the European Renaissance. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Schauerte, Thomas Ulrich, ed. Deutschlands Auge & Ohr: Nürnberg als Medienzentrum der Reformationszeit. Nuremberg: Tümmel Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Scheller, Robert. A Survey of Medieval Model Books. Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn, 1963.Google Scholar
Schenda, Rudolf. “Der ‘gemeine Mann’ und sein medikales Verhalten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert.” In Telle, Joachim, ed., Pharmazie und der gemeine Mann: Hausarznei und Apotheke in der frühen Neuzeit: erläutert anhand deutscher Fachschriften der Herzog-August-Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und pharmazeutischer Geräte des Deutschen Apotheken-Museums Heidelberg. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora, 1988.Google Scholar
Scher, Stephen K. The Currency of Fame: Portrait Medals of the Renaissance. New York: Abrams, 1994.Google Scholar
Scher, Stephen K. ed. Perspectives on the Renaissance Medal. New York: Garland Publishing and American Numismatic Society, 2000.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. Early Technologies. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Jean-Claude. “Enzyklopädismus und Bild-Enzyklopädien im Mittelalter.” In the proceedings of Die Welt im Bild. Bildenzykopädien um 1500. Conference at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, July 13–15, 2022.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Jean-Claude. L’Histoire en lignes et en rondelles: les figures du temps chretien au Moyen Age. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Jean-Claude. Penser par figure: du compas divin aux diagrammes magiques. Paris: Arkhê, 2019.Google Scholar
Schön, Erhard, Baer, Leo, and Zell, Christoph. Unterweisung der Proportion und Stellung der Possen, Nürnberg 1542. Frankfurt: J. Baer & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
Schöner, Christoph. Mathematik und Astronomie an der Universität Ingolstadt im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottenloher, Karl. “Die Druckprivilegien des 16. jahrhunderts.” Gutenberg Jahrbuch (1933): 89–110.Google Scholar
Schottenloher, Karl. Die Landshuter Buchdrucker des 16. Jahrhunderts. Nieuwkoop: B. de Graaf, 1967.Google Scholar
Scodel, Joshua. “The Affirmation of Paradox: A Reading of Montaigne’s ‘De La Phisionomie’ (III:12).” Yale French Studies 64 (1983): 209–37.Google Scholar
Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds. Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Sherman, Claire Richter and Copenhaver, Brian P.. Writing on Hands: Memory and Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Shirley, John W. and Hoeniger, F. David, eds. Science and the Arts in the Renaissance. Washington, DC and London: Folger Shakespeare Library and Associated University Presses, 1985.Google Scholar
Shirley, Rodney W. The Mapping of the World: Early Printed World Maps, 1472–1700. Riverside, CT: Early World Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Silver, Larry. Art and Dis-Illusion in the Long Sixteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Larry. “The Face Is Familiar: German Renaissance Portrait Multiples in Print and Medals.” Word & Image 19, no. 1 (2003): 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Larry. “World of Wonders: Exotic Animals in European Imagery, 1515–1650.” In Cuneo, Pia F. and Stewart, Alison G., eds., Animals and Early Modern Identity. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. The Key of Green: Passion and Perception in Renaissance Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. “A Creative Moment: Thoughts on the Genesis of the German Portrait Medal.” In Scher, Stephen, ed., Perspectives on the Renaissance Medal. New York: Garland Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. ed. Visual Acuity and the Arts of Communication in Early Modern Germany. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela H.Making as Knowing: Craft as Natural Philosophy.” In Smith, Pamela H., Meyers, Amy R. W., and Cook, Harold J., Ways of Making and Knowing: The Material Culture of Empirical Knowledge. New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2017.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela H., Meyers, Amy R. W., and Cook, Harold J.. Ways of Making and Knowing: The Material Culture of Empirical Knowledge. New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2017.Google Scholar
Snyder, John P.Map Projections in the Renaissance.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Söll-Tauchert, Sabine. Hans Baldung Grien (1484/85–1545): Selbstbildnis und Selbstinszenierung. Cologne: Böhlau, 2010.Google Scholar
Sorce, Francesco. “Metafore in bianco e nero: Propaganda antiturca nelle stampe di Nicolò Nelli.” In Sorce, Francesco, ed., En Blanc et Noir: Studi in onore di Silvana Macchioni. Rome: Campisano Editore, 2007.Google Scholar
Spiller, Elizabeth. Science, Reading, and Renaissance Literature: The Art of Making Knowledge, 1580–1670. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stafford, Barbara Maria. Artful Science: Enlightenment, Entertainment, and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stafford, Barbara MariaBody Criticism: Imaging the Unseen in Enlightenment Art and Medicine. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Stemmler, Joan K.The Physiognomical Portraits of Johann Caspar Lavater.” Art Bulletin 75 (1993): 151–68.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Bruce, Bolt, Marvin, and Friedman, Anna Felicity. The Universe Unveiled: Instruments and Images through History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alison G. Before Bruegel: Sebald Beham and the Origins of Peasant Festival Imaginery. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Stijnman, Ad and Savage, Elizabeth. Printing Colour 1400–1700: History, Techniques, Functions and Receptions. Boston, MA: Brill, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Jan Van der, ed. In Search of Utopia: Art and Science in the Era of Thomas More. Leuven and Amsterdam: Davidsfonds Uitgeverij and Amsterdam University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Stoichita, Victor, Glasheen, Anne-Marie, and Pericolo, Lorenzo. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. London: Harvey Miller, 2015.Google Scholar
Stopp, Frederick J. The Emblems of the Altdorf Academy: Medals and Medal Orations, 1577–1626. London: Modern Humanities Research Association, 1974.Google Scholar
Strauss, Walter L. The Complete Drawings of Albrecht Dürer. Volume 3: 1510–1519. New York: Abaris, 1974.Google Scholar
Strauss, Walter L. The Human Figure by Albrecht Dürer: The Complete “Dresden Sketchbook. New York: Dover Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Stubbe, Wolf. “Unbekannte Zeichnungen altdeutscher Meister.” In Stubbe, Wolf et al., eds., Museum und Kunst: Beiträge für Alfred Hentzen. Hamburg: Christians, 1970.Google Scholar
Taape, Tillmann. “Common Medicine for the Common Man: Picturing the ‘Striped Layman’ in Early Vernacular Print.” Renaissance Quarterly 74 (2021): 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Charles. “Topography as Landscape in Early Printed Books.” In Hindman, Sandra, The Early Illustrated Book Essays in Honor of Lessing Julius Rosenwald. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1982.Google Scholar
Telle, Joachim, ed. Pharmazie und der gemeine Mann: Hausarznei und Apotheke in der frühen Neuzeit: erläutert anhand deutscher Fachschriften der Herzog-August-Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und pharmazeutischer Geräte des Deutschen Apotheken-Museums Heidelberg. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora, 1988.Google Scholar
Tessicini, Dario. “Definitions of ‘Cosmography’ and ‘Geography’ in the Wake of 15th and 16th Century Translations and Editions of Ptolemy’s Geography.” In Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds., Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. “The Problem of the Composite Manuscript.” In Giovanni Mercati: Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1946.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn and Bosco, Joannes de Sacro, eds. The Sphere of Sacrobosco and Its Commentators. Corpus of Mediaeval Scientific Texts: Volume 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Turner, Anthony John. Early Scientific Instruments: Europe 1400–1800. London: Sotheby’s Publications, 1987.Google Scholar
Valleriani, Matteo, ed. De Sphaera of Johannes de Sacrobosco in the Early Modern Period: The Authors of the Commentaries. Cham: Springer, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valleriani, Matteo, The Structures of Practical Knowledge. Cham: Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Buren, Anne H. and Edmunds, Sheila. “Playing Cards and Manuscripts: Some Widely Disseminated Fifteenth-Century Model Sheets.” Art Bulletin 56, no. 1 (1974): 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanden Broecke, Steven. The Limits of Influence: Pico, Louvain and the Crisis of Renaissance Astrology. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanden Broecke, Steven. “The Use of Visual Media in Renaissance Cosmography: The Cosmography of Peter Apian and Gemma Frisius.” Paedagogica Historica 36, no. 1 (2000): 130–50.Google Scholar
Van der Stock, Jan. In Search of Utopia: Art and Science in the Era of Thomas More. Leuven: Davidsfonds Uitgeverij, 2016.Google Scholar
Van Duzer, Chet. “Johann Schöner’s Globe of 1515: Transcription and Study.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 100, no. 5 (2010): 1217.Google Scholar
van Gastel, Joris, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds. Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar
Van Leerdam, Andrea. “Talking Heads. The Visual Rhetoric of Recurring Scholar Woodcuts in a Sixteenth-Century Handbook on Chiromancy.” Jaarboek voor Nederlandse Boekgeschiedenis 26 (2019): 1129.Google Scholar
van Ortroy, Fernand. Bibliographie de l’oeuvre de Pierre Apian. Amsterdam: Meridian, 1963.Google Scholar
Van Putten, Jasper. Networked Nation: Mapping German Cities in Sebastian Münster’s “Cosmographia.” Leiden: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltman, Kim H.Ptolemy and the Origins of Linear Perspective.” In Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Tenutosi al Castello Sforzesco, Civiche Raccolte d’Arte di Milano, dall’11 al 15 Ottobre del 1977. Florence: Centro Di, 1980.Google Scholar
Vogtherr, Heinrich. “Heinrich Vogtherr: Ein frembds und wunderbars Kunstbüchlin allen Molern/ Bildschnitzern/ Goldschmiden/ Steinmetzen/ Schreinern/ Platnern/ Waffen und Messerschmiden hochnutzlich zu gebrauchen (Straßburg 1538/1572) herausgegeben und kommentiert von Maria Heilmann.” Ed. Maria Heilmann, FONTES 61 (2011).Google Scholar
Voigt, Lisa and Brancaforte, Elio. “The Traveling Illustrations of Sixteenth-Century Travel Narratives.” PMLA 129, no. 3 (2014): 365–98.Google Scholar
Vorholt, Hanna. Shaping Knowledge: The Transmission of the Liber Floridus. London: Warburg Institute, 2017.Google Scholar
Wade, Mara. “The Emblems of the Altdorf Academy: Emblematic Pedagogy and Nuremberg Civic Culture.” Histories of Universities XXXIV, no. 2 (2021): 137–70.Google Scholar
Walsby, Malcolm and Kemp, Graeme. The Book Triumphant: Print in Transition in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
West, Ashley. “Conrad Peutinger and the Visual Arts: Collaborating with Hans Burgkmair the Elder.” In Laube, Reinhard and Zäh, Helmut, eds., Gesammeltes Gedächtnis: Konrad Peutinger und die kulturelle Überlieferung im 16. Jahrhundert. Lucerne: Quaternio Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Westman, Robert S.The Astronomer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study.” History of Science 18 (1980): 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetter, Evelin, Scholten, Frits, and Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. Prayer-Nuts, Private Devotion and Early Modern Art Collecting. Riggisberg: Abegg-Stiftung, 2017.Google Scholar
Williams, Steven J.Roger Bacon and the Secret of Secrets.” In Hackett, Jeremiah, ed., Roger Bacon and the Sciences. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, Steven J. The Secret of Secrets: The Scholarly Career of a Pseudo-Aristotelian Text in the Late Middle Ages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bronwen. “Learning How to Read: Giovanni Battista Della Porta, Physiognomy, and Printed Portrait-Books.” Paper delivered at Visual Knowledges Conference, University of Edinburgh, 17–20 September 2003.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bronwen. “Reflecting on the Turk in Late Sixteenth-Century Venetian Portrait Books.” Word & Image 19, no. 1 (2003): 3858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bronwen. The World in Venice: Print, the City and Early Modern Identity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Winkler, Friedrich. Die Zeichnungen Albrecht Dürers. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1938.Google Scholar
Wood, Christopher S. Forgery, Replica, Fiction: Temporalities of German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Woodward, David, ed. The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Yanni, Carla. Nature’s Museums. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. Ways of Lying. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Zelen, Joyce. Blinded by Curiosity: The Collector-Dealer Hadriaan Beverland (1650–1716). Leiden: Primavera Pers, 2022.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Joseph, “Philosophers and Physicians on the Scientific Validity of Latin Physiognomy, 1200–1500.” Early Science and Medicine 12, no. 3 (2007): 285312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinner, Ernst. Deutsche und niederländische astronomische Instrumente des 11.–18. Jahrhunderts. 2nd ed. Munich: Beck, 1967.Google Scholar
Zinner, Ernst. Regiomontanus: His Life and Work. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar