![](https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/81180/cover/9780521881180.jpg)
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part 1 Modern mobilities
- Part 2 Discursive frameworks
- Part 3 Transnational solidarities
- Part 4 Challenge and consolidation
- 10 International conferences: cosmopolitan amity or racial enmity?
- 11 Japanese alienation and imperial ambition
- 12 Racial equality? The Paris Peace Conference, 1919
- 13 Immigration restriction in the 1920s: ‘segregation on a large scale’
- Part 5 Towards universal human rights
- Index
13 - Immigration restriction in the 1920s: ‘segregation on a large scale’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part 1 Modern mobilities
- Part 2 Discursive frameworks
- Part 3 Transnational solidarities
- Part 4 Challenge and consolidation
- 10 International conferences: cosmopolitan amity or racial enmity?
- 11 Japanese alienation and imperial ambition
- 12 Racial equality? The Paris Peace Conference, 1919
- 13 Immigration restriction in the 1920s: ‘segregation on a large scale’
- Part 5 Towards universal human rights
- Index
Summary
Preaching the gospel of whiteness
In February 1924, the sixty-year-old W. M. Hughes sailed from Sydney for a five-month lecture tour of the United States. Now a backbencher, he had lost the leadership of the conservative government after the national elections at the end of 1922, following conflict between the coalition partners. He spoke in major American cities and was invited to leading universities. He had prepared talks on a number of topics – the Versailles Conference, Reparations, the League of Nations and Australia's system of industrial arbitration, but the lectures that attracted most attention were on the future of international relations in the Pacific and the White Australia policy.
It was race that most interested his American audience and Hughes didn't disappoint them, explaining that in Australia, ‘we believe in race’. Hughes subscribed to the idea that as Anglo-Saxons, Australians and Americans were ‘brother nations by blood’ (interestingly, perhaps as a result of the war, Josiah Royce's ‘sister republics’ were now imagined as masculine in character). Race was responsible, said Hughes, for the energy and the initiative ‘of our people’. The greatness of the United States was due to the hitherto purity of stock, which must not be watered down by the mixture of alien races. Australia was of the same select stock and claimed to be 97 per cent Anglo-Saxon.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Drawing the Global Colour LineWhite Men's Countries and the International Challenge of Racial Equality, pp. 310 - 332Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008