Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T19:42:19.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Argument from Design

A Brief History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Professor of Philosophy, Florida State University
William A. Dembski
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

The argument from design for the existence of God – sometimes known as the teleological argument – claims that there are aspects of the world that cannot be explained except by reference to a Creator. It is not a Christian argument as such, but it has been appropriated by Christians. Indeed, it forms one of the major pillars of the natural-theological approach to belief – that is, the approach that stresses reason, as opposed to the revealed-theological approach that stresses faith and (in the case of Catholics) authority. This chapter is a very brief history of the argument from design, paying particular attention to the impact of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection, as presented in his Origin of Species, published in 1859.

FROM THE GREEKS TO CHRISTIANITY

According to Xenophon (Memorabilia, I, 4.2–18), it was Socrates who first introduced the argument to Western thought, but it is Plato who gives the earliest full discussion, in his great dialogue about the death of Socrates (the Phaedo) and then in later dialogues (the Timaeus, especially). Drawing a distinction between causes that simply function and those that seem to reveal some sort of plan, Plato wrote about the growth of a human being:

I had formerly thought that it was clear to everyone that he grew through eating and drinking; that when, through food, new flesh and bones came into being to supplement the old, and thus in the same way each kind of thing was supplemented by new substances proper to it, only then did the mass which was small become large, and in the same way the small man big.

(Phaedo, 96 d, quoted in Cooper 1997, 83–4)
Type
Chapter
Information
Debating Design
From Darwin to DNA
, pp. 13 - 31
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, T. 1952. Summa Theologica, I. London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne
Augustine. 1998. The City of God against the Pagans, ed. and trans. R. W. Dyson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bacon, F. [1605] 1868. The Advancement of Learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Barth, K. 1933. The Epistle to the Romans. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Beecher, H. W. 1885. Evolution and Religion. New York: Fords, Howard, and Hulbert
Behe, M. 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free Press
Buckland, W. 1836. Geology and Mineralogy (Bridgewater Treatise, 6). London: William Pickering
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray
Darwin, C. 1985-. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dawkins, R. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In Molecules to Men, ed. D. S. Bendall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dawkins, R. 1995 A River Out of Eden. New York: Basic Books
Dembski, W. 1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster
Eldredge, N., and S. J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Models in Paleobiology, ed. T. J. M. Schopf. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, pp. 82–115
Galen. 1968. On the usefulness of the parts of the body, trans. M. T. May. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A.. 1996. Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology 173: 357–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, E. O. 1894. The Life and Correspondence of William Buckland. London: John Murray
Gould, S. J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Hodge, C. 1872. Systematic Theology. London and Edinburgh: Nelson
Hodge, C. 1874. What Is Darwinism? New York: Scribner's
Hooker, R. 1845. The Collected Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hume, D. [1779] 1963. Dialogues concerning natural religion. In Hume on Religion, ed. R. Wollheim. London: Fontana, pp. 99–204
Maynard Smith, J. 1969. The status of neo-Darwinism. In Towards a Theoretical Biology, ed. C. H. Waddington. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Olson, R. 1987. On the nature of God's existence, wisdom, and power: The interplay between organic and mechanistic imagery in Anglican natural theology – 1640–1740. In Approaches to Organic Form: Permutations in Science and Culture, ed. F. Burwick. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–48
Paley, W. [1802]1819. Natural Theology (Collected Works, IV). London: Rivington
Pannenberg, W. 1993. Towards a Theology of Nature. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press
Ray, J. 1709. The Wisdom of God, Manifested in the Works of Creation, 5th ed. London: Samuel Smith
Rolston, III. H. 1987. Science and Religion. New York: Random House
Rolston III, H. 1999. Genes, Genesis and God: Values and Their Origins in Natural and Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ruse, M. 1979. The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Ruse, M. 1999. Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Ruse, M. 2003. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Sober, E. 2000. Philosophy of Biology, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO.: Westview
Spencer, H. 1857. Progress: Its law and cause. Westminster Review 67: 244–67Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1955. Le Phénomème Humaine. Paris: Editions de Seuil
Temple, F. 1884. The Relations between Religion and Science. London: Macmillan
Whewell, W. 1840. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. 2 vols. London: Parker
Xenophon. 1994. Memorabilia, trans. A. L. Bonnette. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×