References

Akinpelu, J. 1967. ‘The Stoic scala naturae’. Phrontisterion 5: 7–16.Google Scholar

Algra, K. 2009. ‘Stoic Philosophical Theology and Graeco-Roman Religion’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 224–51.Google Scholar

Alesse, F. 2011–12. ‘Dio, anima e intelligibili nella Stoa’. Χώρα: Revue d’Études Anciennes et Médiévales 9–10: 365–81.Google Scholar

Alpina, T. 2018a. ‘Knowing the Soul from Knowing Oneself: A Reading of the Prologue to Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Nafs (Book of the Soul)’. Atti e Memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’ 82.68: 443–58.Google Scholar

Alpina, T. 2018b. ‘The Soul of, the Soul in Itself, and the Flying Man Experiment’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 28.2: 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpina, T. 2021. Subject, Definition, Activity: Framing Avicenna’s Science of the Soul, Scientia Graeco-Arabica series 28, De Gruyter, Berlin: Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpina, T. Forthcoming. ‘Retaining, Remembering, Recollecting. Avicenna’s Account of Memory and Its Sources’ in V. Decaix, C. Thomsen Thörnqvist (eds.), Aristotle’s De memoria et reminiscentia and Its Reception, Studia Artistarum, Brepols Publishers.Google Scholar

Alt, K. 1973. ‘Zum Satz des Anaximenes über die Seele: Untersuchung von Aëtios Περὶ ἀρχῶν’. Hermes 101: 129–64.Google Scholar

Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. 2015. Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andral, G. 1829. Grundriss der pathologischen Anatomie: Erster Theil: Allgemeine pathologische Anatomie. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar

Archer-Hind, R. D. (ed.). 1888. The Timaeus of Plato. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. 1966–88. Plotinus Enneads. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Attfield, R. 1994. Environmental Philosophy: Principles and Prospects. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. 1976. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltes, M. 1997. ‘Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic beyond Being?’ in Joyal, M. (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate, 3–23.Google Scholar

Baltes, M. 1999. ‘Gegonen (Platon, Tim. 28b7): Ist die Welt real enstanden oder nicht?’ in Baltes, M. (ed.), DIANOHMATA Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus. Stuttgart: De Gruyter, 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with selections from II. 1–3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. 2007. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus: Vol. III, Book 3, Part 1. Proclus on the World’s Body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. Rev. ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2009. ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be?’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, S. 2002. ‘Galen and the Mechanical Philosophy’. Apeiron 35: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, S. 2003. ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’. Phronesis 47: 344–69.Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2000. ‘Metaphysics Lambda 6’ in Frede, M. and Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–206.Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2012. ‘The Finality of Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover in the Metaphysics Book 12, Chapters 7 and 10’. Nova et Vetera 10: 863–76.Google Scholar

Bertolacci, A. 2006. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ: A Milestone of Western Metaphysical Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. 2007. ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology’. Phronesis 52: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betegh, G. 2013. ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology (with New Appendices)’ in Sider, T. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter, 225–61.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. 2018. ‘Plato and Cosmology, Theology and Cognition’ in Sisko, J. E. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, vol. 1. London: Taylor and Francis, 120–40.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bien, C. G. 1997. Erklärungen zur Entstehung von Missbildungen im physiologischen und medizinischen Schrifttum der Antike. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. 1999. ‘Chrysippus’ Theory of Causes’ in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 196–242.Google Scholar

Boechat, E. 2016. ‘Stoic Physics and the Aristotelianism of Posidonius’. Ancient Philosophy 36: 425–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boechat, E. 2017. ‘The Concept of the Sun as ἡγεμονικόν in the Stoa and in Manilius’ Astronomica’. Archai 21: 79–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, R. 2009. ‘Two Standards of Inquiry in Aristotle’s De caelo’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 51–82.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. 2007. ‘Aristotle on Dissection of Plants and Animals and His Concept of the Instrumental Soul-Body’. Ancient Philosophy 27: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon, V. 2000. Galien, Exhortation à la médecine, Art médical. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. 2007. Galien, Sur l’ordre des ses propres livres, Sur ses propres livres, Que l’excéllent médecin est aussi philosophe. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A. 2005. ‘Galien résussicité: édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’. Revue des Études grecques 118: 168–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. 2007. ‘Physiognomy in Ancient Philosophy’ in Swain, S. et al. (eds.), Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–124.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. 2016. ‘Philosophy as Religion and the Meaning of “Providence” in Middle Platonism’ in Eidenow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317–38.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. 2018 [= BS]. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisson, L. 1995 (repr. 2017). Platon. Timée-Critias. Traduction, introduction, et notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1998. Le Même et l’Autre dans la Structure Ontologique du Timée de Platon. Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 2006. ‘The Intellect and the Cosmos’. Methodos 16. http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4463.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. F. 2002. ‘Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 253–308.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2009. ‘Heavenly Bodies and First Causes’ in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell, 230–41.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. 2015. ‘Stoic Sympathy’ in Schliesser, E. (ed.), Sympathy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1999. ‘Stoic Metaphysics’ in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–32.Google Scholar

Brüntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L. (eds.). 2017. Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burkhard, U. 1973. Die angebliche Heraklit-Nachfolge des Skeptikers Aenesidem. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Caluori, D. 2015. Plotinus on the Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, G. 2000. ‘Zoogony and Evolution in Plato’s Timaeus: The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin’ in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 145–80.Google Scholar

Carone, G. R. 1998. ‘Plato and the Environment’. Environmental Ethics 20: 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carone, G. R. 2005. Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, A. 2010. ‘Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus’. Phronesis 55: 281–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caston, V. 2006. ‘Aristotle’s Psychology’ in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 316–46.Google Scholar

Caveing, M. 1965–6. ‘Quelques remarques sur le Timée et les mathématiques’. Revue de l’Enseignement Philosophique 15: 1–10.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2017. ‘The De Caelo et Mundo of Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ: An Overview of Its Structure, Its Goal and Its Polemical Background’. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 28: 273–329.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, C. F. and Lennox, J. G. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Function’. Phronesis 65: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colish, M. 1990. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Coope, U. 2007. ‘Aristotle on Action’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 109–38.Google Scholar

Coope, U. 2020. ‘Animal and Celestial Motion: The Role of an External Springboard: De Motu Animalium 2 and 3’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum) 240–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 2003. ‘Stoic Autonomy’ repr. in his Knowledge, Nature and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 204–44.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 2009. ‘Chrysippus on Physical Elements’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, J. 2020. ‘The Role of Thought in Animal Voluntary Self-Locomotion’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum) 345–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. London: Taylor and Francis. Reprinted in Indianapolis by Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 1978–84. Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. 3 vols. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 1992. Galen: On Semen. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,1. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2017. ‘Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 203–16.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2007. ‘Ex uno non fit nisi unum : storia e preistoria della dottrina avicenniana della Prima Intelligenza’ in Canone, E. (ed.), Per una storia del concetto di mente. Firenze: L. S. Olschki, 29–55.Google Scholar

Davidson, H. A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 1980–4. Galen, On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. 3 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Diehl, E. 1903–6. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum Commentaria. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 9th ed. 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 2003. The Heirs of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distelzweig, P. 2013. ‘The Intersection of the Mathematical and Natural Sciences: The Subordinate Sciences in Aristotle’. Apeiron 46: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 1991. Platon. Phédon. Introduction, traduction et notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar

Duminil, M. P. 1983. Le sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur dans la collection hippocratique. Anatomie et physiologie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Duminil, M. P. 1998. Hippocrate: Book VIII. Plaies, Nature des os, Cœur, Anatomie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falcon, A. 2016. ‘The Subject Matter of Aristotle’s Physics’ in Buchheim, T., Meissner, D. and Wachsmann, N. (eds.), Sōma : Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 423–36.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. ‘The Scientific Role of Eulogos in Cael II.12’ in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–40.Google Scholar

Fazzo, S. 2012. Il Libro Lambda della Metafisica di Aristotele. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Feke, J. 2018. Ptolemy’s Philosophy: Mathematics as a Way of Life. Princeton University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. 1966–1968. Proclus. Commentaire sur le Timée. 5 vols. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, A. 2013. ‘Heraclitus, the Rival of Pythagoras’ in Sider, D. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter, 147–62.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, A. 2017. Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme: A Historical Study. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, H. 1969. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Philosophy 66: 829–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frampton, M. F. 1991. ‘Aristotle’s Cardiocentric Model of Animal Locomotion’. Journal of the History of Biology 24: 291–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frede, D. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2017 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/alexander-aphrodisias/.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1992. ‘Doxographie, historiographie philosophique et historiographie historique de la philosophie’. Revue de métaphysique et de morale 97: 311–25.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2003. ‘Galen’s Theology’ in Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classicque 49 (Galien et la Philosophie). Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 73–126.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Sather Classical Lectures. Edited by Long, A. A. with a foreword by David Sedley. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2005. Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1977. ‘The Theory of Affordances’ in Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward and Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 68–82.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1977. Manilius, Astronomica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. 1991. ‘Socrates, the Craft Analogy, and Science’. Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, A. 2016. Anaximander: A Re-assessment. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Goff, P., Seager, W. and Hermanson, S. A. 2017. ‘Panpsychism’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. 1997 (origin. 1935). Plato, Phaedo in Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), Plato: Complete Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–100.Google Scholar

Gurtler, G. 1988. Plotinus: The Experience of Unity. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 2006. ‘Imagination and transcendental knowledge in Avicenna’, in J. E. Montgomery (ed.), Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy. From the Many to the One: Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank,, Leuven – Paris – Dudley: Uitgeverij Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies, 337–354.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 2011. ‘Manilius’ Conflicted Stoicism’ in Green, S. J. and Volk, K. (eds.), Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Vol. 2. Berlin: Georg Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haeckel, E. 1903. Anthropogenie. 5th ed. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. 1994. ‘Self-Motion in Stoic Philosophy’ in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 175–226.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1988. ‘Galen Explains the Elephant’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14.Suppl.: 135–57.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1989. ‘Galen and the Best of All Possible Worlds’. Classical Quarterly 39: 206–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hankinson, R. J. 2017. ‘Teleology and Necessity in Greek Embryology’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242–71.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. Forthcoming. ‘A Hymn to Nature: Structure, function, design and beauty in Galen’s biology’ in D. De Brasi and F. Fronterotta (eds.), Poikile physis, Biological Literature in Greek during the Roman Empire: Genres, Scopes, and Problems. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Harding, S. 2006. Animate Earth: Science, Intuition and Gaia. Cambridge: Green Books.Google Scholar

Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasnaoui, A. 1984. ‘La dynamique d’Ibn Sīnā. La notion d’inclination: mayl’ in Jolivet, J. and Rashed, R. (eds.), Études sur Avicenne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 103–23.Google Scholar

Hasnaoui, A. 1990. ‘Fayḍ’ in Auroux, S. (ed.), Encyclopédie philosophique universelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2:966–72.Google Scholar

Hasnaoui, A. 2014. ‘La théorie avicennienne de l’impetus. Ibn Sīnā entre Jean Philopon et Jean Buridan’ in Arfa Mensia, M. (ed.), Views on the Philosophy of Ibn Sīnā and Mullā Ṣadrā al-Šīrāzī (Carthage, 22nd–24th Oct. 2013). Tunis: al-Mağmaʿ al-Tūnisī li-l-ʿUlūm wa-l-ādāb wa-l-Funūn, 25–42.Google Scholar

Heath, D. L. 1913. Aristarchos of Samos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2015. ‘Aristotle on the Cosmological Significance of Biological Generation’ in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, D. 2016. ‘The Failure of Evolutionary Thinking in Antiquity’ in Irby, G. L. (ed.), A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2:313–28.Google Scholar

Helle, R. 2018. ‘Hierocles and the Stoic Theory of Blending’. Phronesis 63: 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmreich, G. 1893. Galeni Scripa Minora. Vol. 3. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. 1907–9. Galenus: de Usu Partium. 2 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. 2014. Seneca, Natural Questions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Horn, C. 2012. ‘Aspects of Biology in Plotinus’ in Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–28.Google Scholar

Huffman, C. 1993. Philolaus of Croton, Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 2001. The Poem of Empedocles. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1982. Senocrate-Ermodoro, Frammenti. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1991. ‘Fra Stoa e media Stoa’ in Filosofia e scienza nel pensiero ellenistico. Naples: Morano Editore, 231–63.Google Scholar

Jaskolla, L. J. and Buck, A. J. 2012. ‘Does Panexperientialism Solve the Combination Problem?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 19: 190–99.Google Scholar

Janos, D. 2011. ‘Moving the Orbs: Astronomy, Physics, and Metaphysics, and the Problem of Celestial Motion according to Ibn Sīnā’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 21: 165–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janos, D. Forthcoming. Ptolemy’s Theory of the Psychic Powers of the Planets in Arabic Philosophy: Some Key Sources and Problemsin A. C. Bowen, E. Gannagé, H. Umut, The Philosophy of Ptolemy and its Greek, Arabic, and Hebrew Reception, Brill.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. 1987. ‘Le souffle, la vie et le froid: remarques sur la famille de ψύχω d’Homère à Hippocrate’. Revue des Etudes Grecques 100: 203–24.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2009. ‘From Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s De caelo’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 9–28.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2014. ‘Why the Cosmos Needs a Craftsman’. Phronesis 59: 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2008. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2019. ‘Aristotle on Kosmos and Kosmoi’ in Horky, P. (ed.), Cosmos in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joly, R. 1960. Recherches sur le traité pseudo-hippocratique Du régime. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Joly, R. 1967. Hippocrate Du Régime. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Joly, R. and Byl, S. 2003. Hippocratis De diaeta. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum I 2,4. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar

Jori, A. 2005. ‘Blut und Leben bei Aristoteles’ in Gadebusch Bondio, M. (ed.), Blood in History and Blood Histories. Florence: Sismel–Edizioni del Galluzzo, 19–38.Google Scholar

Judson, L. 1994. ‘Heavenly Motion and the Unmoved Mover’ in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Movers from Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 155–71.Google Scholar

Karbowski, J. 2014. ‘Empirical Eulogōs Argumentation in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals III.10’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karfík, F. 2014. ‘L’âme du monde: Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle’. Études platoniciennes. http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/572.Google Scholar

Kepler, J. 1596. Mysterium Cosmographicum. Frankfurt: Erasmus Kempfer.Google Scholar

Kerschensteiner, , J. 1962. Kosmos: Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Keyt, D. 1971. ‘The Mad Craftsman of the Timaeus’. Philosophical Review 80: 230–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kielmeyer, C. F. 1793/1993. Über die Verhältnisse der organischen Kräfte unter einander in der Reihe der verschiedenen Organisationen, die Gesetze und Folgen dieser Verhältnisse. Faksimile der Ausgabe Stuttgart 1793. Marburg an der Lahn: Basilisken-Press.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. 1999. Posidonius: The Translation of the Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kohlbrugge, J. H. F. 1911. ‘Das biogenetische Grundgesetz: Eine historische Studie’. Zoologischer Anzeiger 38: 447–53.Google Scholar

Kudlien, F. 1981. ‘Galen’s Religious Belief’ in Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen: Problems and Prospects. London: Wellcome Institute, 117–30.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2008. Diogène d’Apollonie: édition, traduction et commentaire des fragments et témoignages. 2nd rev. ed. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2007. ‘Les fonctions de l’intellect chez Anaxagore’ in Histoire, Doxographie, Vérité: Études sur Aristote, Théophraste et la philosophie présocratique. Louvain: Editions Peeters, 132–48.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2015. ‘Sommeils Présocratiques’ in Leroux, V., Palmieri, N. and Pigné, C. (eds.), Le Sommeil: Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Paris: Honoré Champion, 29–50.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2020. ‘Articulating the De Motu Animalium. The Place of the Treatise Within the Corpus Aristotelicum’ in Ch. Rapp and O. Primavesi (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford University Press, pp. 272–95.Google Scholar

Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.). 2016. Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2018. ‘How Preplatonic Worlds Became Ensouled’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 1–34.Google Scholar

Lanza, D. and Vegetti, M. 1971. Opere biologiche di Aristotele. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar

Lapidge, M. 1989. ‘Stoic Cosmology and the Roman Literature, First to Third Centuries A.D.’ in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II 36, 3. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1379–1429.Google Scholar

Le Blay, F. 2014. ‘Pneumatism in Seneca: An Example of Interaction between Physics and Medicine’ in Maire, B. (ed.), ‘Greek’ and ‘Roman’ in Latin Medical Texts. Studies in Cultural Change and Exchange in Ancient Medicine. Leiden: Brill, 63–76.Google Scholar

LeBlond, J.-M. 1938. Eulogos et l’argument de convenance chez Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Leboucq, J. B. G. 1944. ‘Une anatomie du cœur humain. Philistion de Locres et le “Timée” de Platon’. Revue des Études Grecques 57: 7–40.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Theophrastus on the Limits of Teleology’ in Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.), Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Works. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 143–51.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1986. ‘Aristotle, Galileo, and the Mixed Sciences’ in Wallace, W. (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 29–51.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1994. ‘The Disappearance of Aristotle’s Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery’. Apeiron 27: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1997. ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain…’ in Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 199–214. Repr. in Lennox 2001b, 205–24.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle on the Parts of Animals I–IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001b. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2009. ‘De caelo II.2 and Its Debt to De incessu animalium’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 187–214.Google Scholar

Lernould, A. 2000. ‘Mathématique et physique chez Proclus: l’interprétation proclienne de la notion de lien en Timée 31b-32c’ in O’Meara, D. J. and Bechtle, G. (eds.), La Philosophie des mathématiques de l’Antiquité tardive. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires, 129–47.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2009. ‘Why Stars Have No Feet: Teleological Explanations in Aristotle’s Cosmology’ in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden: Brill, 245–71.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, I. 1997. The Covenant of Reason: Rationality and the Commitments of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, O. 2017. Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma. Fragments and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lizzini, O. 2018. ‘Representation and Reality: On the Definition of Imaginative Prophecy in Avicenna’ in Bydén, B. and Radovic, F. (eds.), The Parva naturalia in Greek, Arabic and Latin Aristotelianism: Supplementing the Science of the Soul. New York: Springer, 133–54.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1971. Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 2005. ‘Mathematics as a Model of Method in Galen’ in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot: Ashgate, 110–30.Google Scholar

Loenen, J. H. 1954. ‘Was Anaximander an Evolutionist?’ Mnemosyne 4: 214–32.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 2002. Epictetus, a Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 2003. ‘Stoicism in the Philosophical Tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler’ in Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lovelock, J. E. 1972. ‘Gaia as Seen through the Atmosphere’. Atmospheric Environment 6: 579–80.Google Scholar

Lovelock, J. E. 1976. ‘The Quest for Gaia’. New Scientist 6: 304–6.Google Scholar

Lovelock, J. E. 2001. Homage to Gaia: The Life of an Independent Scientist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lovelock, J. E. and Margulis, L. 1974. ‘Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis’. International Meteorological Institute 26: 2–10.Google Scholar

McGinnis, J. 2006. ‘Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian’. Phronesis 51: 140–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, R. D., Jr. 1978. ‘Aristotle’s Subordinate Sciences’. British Journal for the History of Science 11.39: 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, R. D., 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1990. ‘Doxography and Dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’ in Haase, W. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.4. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3056–3229.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 2014. ‘Alcmaeon and Plato on Soul’. Etudes platoniciennes 11: 1–9.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 2015. ‘Heraclitus on Soul and Super-Soul: With an Afterthought on the Afterlife’. Rhizomata 3: 62–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 1997. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer: Vol. I. The Sources. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 2009. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer: Vol. II: The Compendium. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 2020. Aëtiana V. An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita. With a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. Part 3 (Books 4 and 5), Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. 1977. Cuore, sangue, cervello: biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico. Milan: Episteme Editrice.Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. 2001. Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary. 2nd ed. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Margulis, L. 1999. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. Houston: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2017a. Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2017b. ‘Stoic Blends’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathews, F. 2011. ‘Panpsychism as Paradigm?’ in Blamauer, M. (ed.), The Mental as Fundamental. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 141–56.Google Scholar

Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, M. T. 1968. Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. 2 vols. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Meijer, P. A. 2007. Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods Including a Commentary on Cleanthes’ Hymn on Zeus. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Michalewski, A. 2014. La puissance de l’intelligible: La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Michot, J. 1986. La destinée de l’homme selon Avicenne. Le retour à Dieu (maʿād) et l’imagination. Louvain: Aedibus Peeters, 110–18.Google Scholar

Morison, B. 2020. ‘Completing the Argument that Locomotion Requires an External and Unmoved Mover. De Motu Animalium 4–5’ in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum), 273–98.Google Scholar

Mortley, R. 1969. ‘Plato’s Choice of the Sphere’. Revue des Études Grecques 82: 342–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, J. 1891. Galeni Scripta Minora. Vol. 2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Nagasawa, Y. and Wager, K. 2016. ‘Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism’ in Brüntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L. (eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–29.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 1979. ‘Panpsychism’ in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–95.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, J. 1959. A History of Embryology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nickel, D. 2001. Galeni de Foetuum Formatione. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3, 3. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, R. 1969. ‘Aristotle’s Philosopher God’. Phronesis 14: 63–74. Repr. in J. Barnes, M. Schofield and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle: Vol. 4. Psychology and Aesthetics. London: Duckworth, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, V. 1978. Galeni de Praecognitione: Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. 1987. ‘Galen’s Philosophical Testament’ in Moraux, P. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung 2: Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben. Berlin: De Gruyter, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, V. 1999. Galen: On My Own Opinions. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 3,2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. 1996. Philodemus, On Piety. Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Brien, C. 2012. ‘The Middle Platonist Demiurge and Stoic Cosmobiology’ Horizons 3: 19–39.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. 1987. ‘Problèmes d’établissement du texte’ in Aubenque, P. (ed.), Études sur Parménide, II: Problèmes d’interprétation. Paris: Vrin, 314–50.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. 1997. ‘L’Empédocle de Platon’. Revue des Études Grecques 110: 381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Meara, D. 1985. Platonic Investigations. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. 2017. Cosmology and Politics in Plato’s Later Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opsomer, J. 2005. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’ in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder. Berlin: De Gruyter, 51–99.Google Scholar

Osborn, H. F. 1929. From the Greeks to Darwin. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar

Oser-Grote, C. M. 2004. Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum: Die Anatomie und Physiologie des Menschen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Parry, R. D. 1979. ‘The Unique World of the Timaeus’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parry, R. D. 1991. ‘The Intelligible World-Animal in Plato’s Timaeus’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29: 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, R. 1981. ‘The Unique Worlds of the Timaeus’. Phoenix 35: 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, A. L. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pérez-Jean, B. 2005. Dogmatisme et scepticisme: l’Héraclitisme d’Enésidème. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du septentrion.Google Scholar

Polito, R. 2004. The Sceptical Road: Aenesidemus’ Appropriation of Heraclitus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, P. 2010. Hippocrates. Vol. IX. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchard, P. 1990. ‘The Meaning of Δύναμις at Timaeus 31c’. Phronesis 35: 182–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, I. 2008. Stoici romani minori. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. 2014. ‘Manilius and Stoicism’ in Garani, M. and Konstan, D. (eds.), The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 161–86.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. and Lucchetta, G. 2004. Allegoria, Vol. I: L’età classica, Introduction by R. Radice. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar

Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.) 2020. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium (Symposium Aristotelicum), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rashed, M. 2004. ‘The Problem of the Composition of the Heavens (529–1610): A New Fragment of Philoponus and Its Readers’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83.Suppl.: 35–56. French version: ‘Le problème de la composition du ciel (529–1610): Un nouveau fragment de Philopon et ses lecteurs’ in M. Rashed, L’héritage aristotélicien: Textes inédits de l’Antiquité. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 649–89.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2005. ‘Imagination astrale et physique supralunaire selon Avicenne’ in Federici-Vescovini, G., Sorge, V. and Vinti, C. (eds.), Corpo e anima, sensi interni e intelletto dai secoli XIII-XV ai post-cartesiani e spinoziani. Turnhout: Brepols, 103–17.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. 1926. Kosmos und Sympathie: Neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 1999. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. ‘Le sage face à Zeus. Logique, éthique et physique dans le stoïcisme impérial’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 579–96.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 2006. ‘The Roman Stoics on Divine Thinking and Human Knowledge’ in Gersh, S. and Moran, D. (eds.), Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 81–94.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 2010. ‘Seneca’s Platonism: The Soul and Its Divine Origin’ in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 2013. ‘The Academy, the Stoics, and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus’ in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, R. J. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivaud, A. 1925. Platon. Timée. Texte et traduction. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1919. Études sur la signification et la place de la physique dans la philosophie de Platon. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1926. Platon. Phédon. Texte et traduction. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1950. Platon. Oeuvres complètes,. Traduction nouvelle et notes (avec la collaboration de M.-J. Moreau). Books I and II Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1922. Aristotle: Metaphysics. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. 2010. Plato, The Last Days of Socrates. Eutyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo. Translation with introduction and notes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rudberg, G. 1951. ‘Empedocles and Evolution’. Eranos 49: 23–30.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. and Share, M. 2008. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus: Vol. II, Book 2. Proclus on the Causes of the Cosmos and Its Creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Salemme, C. 1983. Introduzione agli Astronomica di Manilio. Naples: Loffredo.Google Scholar

Salles, R. 2005. ‘Ekpurosis and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes’. Phronesis 50: 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salles, R. 2005. The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Salles, R. 2003. ‘Determinism and Recurrence in Early Stoic Thought’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 253–72.Google Scholar

Salles, R. 2009. ‘Chrysippus on Conflagration and the Indestructibility of the Cosmos’ in God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salles, R. 2015. ‘Two Early Stoic Theories of Cosmogony’ in Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. D. (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salles, R. 2018a. ‘Why Is the Cosmos Intelligent? (1) Stoic Cosmology and Plato, Philebus 29a9–30a8’. Rhizomata 6.1: 40–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salles, R. 2018b. ‘Two Classic Problems in the Stoic Theory of Time’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 133–83.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S. 1973. Physics of the Stoics. Westport: Greenwood Press. First ed. 1959 in Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S. 1987. The Physical World of the Greeks. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sánchez Castro, L. C. 2016. Traditio animae: la recepción aristotélica de las teorías presocráticas del alma. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar

Sánchez Castro, L. C. 2021. ‘The Aristotelian Reception of Heraclitus’ Conception of the Soul’ in Harry, C. and Habash, J. (eds.), The Reception of Presocratic Natural Philosophy in Later Classical Thought. Leiden: Brill, 377–403.Google Scholar

Sattler, B. M. 2012. ‘A Likely Account of Necessity, Plato’s Receptacle as a Physical and Metaphysical Basis of Space’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50: 159–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sattler, B. In preparation. ‘Thinking Makes the World Go Round - Intellection and Astronomy in Plato’s Timaeus’.Google Scholar

Saunders, T. 2004. Plato: The Laws. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Sauvé-Meyer, S. 2009. ‘Chain of Causes: What Is Stoic Fate?’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauvé-Meyer, S. 2014 ‘Aristotle on What Is Up to Us and What Is Contingent’ in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 75–89.Google Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2010. ‘Monism: The Priority of the Whole’. Philosophical Review 119: 31–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2013. ‘The Action of the Whole’. Aristotelian Society 87.Suppl.: 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. 1983. ‘The Syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’. Phronesis 28: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. 1999. The Stoic Idea of the City. With a foreword by Martha Nussbaum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, W. 1972. ‘Praecordia mundi. Zur Grundlegung der Bedeutung des Zodiak bei Manilius’. Hermes 100: 601–14.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 1989. ‘Teleology and Myth in the Phaedo’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 5: 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 1997a. ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’. Repr. in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 309–28.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 1997b. ‘“Becoming Like God” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’ in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag: 327–39.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1998. ‘Platonic Causes’. Phronesis 43: 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2002. ‘The Origins of Stoic God’ in Frede, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: Brill, 41–83.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2009. ‘Three Kinds of Platonic Immortality’ in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 145–61.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2016. ‘Empedoclean Superorganisms’. Rhizomata 4: 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2017. ‘Socrates, Darwin, and Teleology’ in Rocca, J. (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–42.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. and Long, A. G. 2011. Plato, Meno and Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2015. Aristotle: De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Siegel, R. E. 1973. Galen on Psychology, Psychopathology, and Function and Diseases of the Nervous System. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar

Skrbina, D. 2005. Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solmsen, F. 1961. Cleanthes or Posidonius? The Basis of Stoic Physics. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Shani, I. 2015. ‘Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Metaphysics of Experience’. Philosophical Papers 44: 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steckerl, F. 1958. The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and His School. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steel, C. 2001. ‘The Moral Purpose of the Human Body: A Reading of Timaeus 69–72’. Phronesis 46: 105–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, S. K. 1985. ‘The Double Explanation in the Timaeus’. Ancient Philosophy 5: 25–39. Repr. in G. Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strawson, G. and Freeman, A. 2006. Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism? Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Tarán, L. 1975. Academica: Plato, Philip of Opus, and the Pseudo-Platonic Epinomis. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Thein, K. 2006. ‘The Life Forms and Their Model in Plato’s Timaeus’. Rhizai 2: 241–73.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. 1991. ‘Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic Embryology. Ps.-Plutarch, Plac. V 15.4 Reconsidered’. Mnemosyne 44: 106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tirard, S., Morange, M. and Lazcano, A. 2010. ‘The Definition of Life: A Brief History of an Elusive Scientific Endeavor’. Astrobiology 10: 1003–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Twetten, D. 2016. ‘Aristotelian Cosmology and Causality in Classical Arabic Philosophy’ in Janos, D. (ed.), Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between Christians and Muslims in the Third/Ninth and Fourth/Tenth Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 312–434.Google Scholar

Tyrrell, T. 2013. On Gaia: A Critical Investigation of the Relationship between Life and Earth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Verbeke, G. 1945. L’évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du Stoïcisme à S. Augustin. Paris: Desclée De Brouwer/Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar

Vicaire, P. 1983. Platon. Phédon. Texte et traduction. With an introduction by Robin, L.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1939. ‘The Disorderly Motion in the Timaeus’. Classical Quarterly 33: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogt, K. M. 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogt, K. M. 2012. ‘Michael Frede, a Free Will’. Classical Philology 107: 161–8.Google Scholar

Vogt, K. M. 2014. ‘I Shall Do What I Did: Stoic Views on Action’ in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.), What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 107–20.Google Scholar

Vogt, K. M. 2018. ‘A Unified Notion of Cause’. Rhizomata: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 6: 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volk, K. 2009. Manilius and His Intellectual Background. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vorwerk, M. 2010. ‘Maker or Father? The Demiurge from Plutarch to Plotinus’ in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today. Las Vegas: Parmenides, 79–100.Google Scholar

Vottero, D. 1989. Questioni naturali di Lucio Anneo Seneca. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar

Westra, L. and Robinson, T. (eds.), The Greeks and the Environment. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Wilberding, J. 2006. Plotinus’ Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilberding, J. 2011. ‘Intelligible Kinds and Natural Kinds in Plotinus’. Études Platoniciennes 7: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilberding, J. 2014. ‘Teratology in Neoplatonism’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1021–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilberding, J. 2015. ‘Plato’s Embryology’. Early Science and Medicine 20: 150–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilberding, J. 2017. Forms, Souls and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wildberger, J. 2006. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 2013. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wisnovsky, R. 2002. ‘Final and Efficient Causality in Avicenna’s Cosmology and Theology’. Quaestio 2: 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wisnovsky, R. 2003a. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wisnovsky, R. 2003b. ‘Towards a History of Avicenna’s Distinction between Immanent and Transcendent Causes’ in Reisman, D. and Al-Rahim, A. H. (eds.), Before and after Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group. Leiden: Brill, 49–68.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Zeyl, D. J. 2000. Plato: Timaeus. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar