Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jqctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-04T06:32:47.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - Practical Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

Kamen Valchanov
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Nicola Jones
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Charles W. Hogue
Affiliation:
Northwestern University in Chicago
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118: 120.Google Scholar
Cook, TM, Woodall, N, Frerk, C; 4th National Audit Project of The Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Major complications of airway management in the United Kingdom. Report and findings March 2011. Available from: www.rcoa.ac.uk/document-store/nap4-full-reportGoogle Scholar
Difficult Airway Society UK Guidelines. 2015. Available from: www.das.uk.com/guidelines/downloads.htmlGoogle Scholar
McGrath, BA, Bates, L, Atkinson D, et al. Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of tracheostomy and laryngectomy airway emergencies. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67: 10251041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, D, Harrison, DA, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The Tracman randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013; 309: 21212129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Further Reading

Adegboye, VO, Falade, A, Osinusi, K, Obajimi, MO. Reexpansion pulmonary oedema as a complication of pleural drainage. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2002; 9: 214220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havelock, T, Teoh, R, Laws, D, Gleeson, F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010; 65(Suppl 2): 6176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewett, FC. Thoracentesis: the plan of continuous aspiration. British Medical Journal. 1876; 1: 317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesieme, EB, Dongo, A, Ezemba, N, et al. Tube thoracostomy: complications and its management. Pulmonary Medicine. 2012; 256878.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamont, T, Surkitt-Parr, M, Scarpello, J, et al. Insertion of chest drains: summary of a safety report from the National Patient Safety Agency. British Medical Journal. 2009; 339: b4923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Further Reading

Berdajs, D, Schurr UP, Wagner A, et al. Incidence and pathophysiology of atrioventricular block following mitral valve replacement and ring annuloplasty. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2008; 34: 5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, S, Hobson AR, Kalra PR, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement: incidence, indications, and predictors. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008; 85: 108112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Chami, MF, Sawaya FJ, Kilgo P, et al. Ventricular arrhythmia after cardiac surgery: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 60: 26642671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, AE, Di Marco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline) Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008; 51: e162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdogan, HB, Kayalar N, Ardal H, et al. Risk factors for requirement of permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2006; 21: 211215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glikson, M, Dearani JA, Hyberger LK, et al. Indications, effectiveness, and long-term dependency in permanent pacing after cardiac surgery. American Journal of Cardiology. 1997; 80: 13091313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, RS, Ivanov, J, Cohen, G, Ralph-Edwards, AL. Permanent cardiac pacing after a cardiac operation: predicting the use of permanent pacemakers. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1998; 66: 16981704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knotzer, H, Mayr A, Ulmer H, Lederer W. Tachyarrhythmias in a surgical intensive care unit: a case-controlled epidemiologic study. Intensive Care Medicine. 2000; 26: 908914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q, Kong AL, Chen R, et al. Propofol and arrhythmias: two sides of the coin. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2011; 32: 817823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merin, O, Ilan M, Oren A, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation following cardiac surgery: indications and long-term follow-up. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2009; 32: 712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosseri, M, Meir G, Lotan C, et al. Coronary pathology predicts conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass grafting. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1991; 51: 248252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nardi, P, Pellegrino A, Scafuri A, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement: incidence, risk factors and surgical technical aspects. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Hagerstown). 2010; 11: 1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onalan, O, Crystal A, Lashevsky I, et al. Determinants of pacemaker dependency after coronary and/or mitral or aortic valve surgery with long-term follow-up. American Journal of Cardiology. 2008; 101: 203208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinelt, P, Karth, GD, Geppert, A, Heinz, G. Incidence and type of cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients: a single center experience in a medical-cardiological ICU. Intensive Care Medicine. 2001; 27: 14661473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trappe, H-J, Brandts, B, Weismueller, P. Arrhythmias in the intensive care patient. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2003; 9: 345355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Further Reading

Binanay, C, Califf, R, Hasselblad, V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005; 294: 16251633.Google ScholarPubMed
Guyton, AC. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiological Reviews. 1955: 35: 123129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, S, Harrison, DA, Singer, M, et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366: 472477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marik, PE, Cavallazzi, R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 41: 17741781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marik, PE, Lemson, J. Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our understanding. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 112: 617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGee, DC, Gould, MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348: 11231133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006; 355: 27252732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakka, S, Kozieras, J, Thuemer, O, van Hout, N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007; 99: 337342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandham, JD, Hull, RD, Brant, RF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348: 514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, A, Bernard, G, Thompson, B, et al. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006; 354: 22132224.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×