Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:35:22.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Labor in the Contemporary Social Structure of Accumulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Samuel Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Roosevelt University
Terrence McDonough
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Michael Reich
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David M. Kotz
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

After the end of World War II, an institutional framework – the postwar social structure of accumulation (SSA) – gradually evolved, setting the stage for renewed prosperity in the United States. Domestically, this structure included two important elements. First, the federal government played a more important role in stabilizing and fostering the growth of the economy and in protecting, to a degree, individuals and businesses from competitive forces in the economy. Second, while labor and management continued to be in competitive conflict, there was a shared set of understandings about the nature of the conflict with “management's rights” and “labor's role” becoming more clearly defined. Internationally, the postwar institutional framework was characterized by the economic and political dominance of the United States.

Strains in this postwar SSA began to appear in the late 1960s and continued in the 1970s. Stagflation, one of the outward manifestations of such strains, reflected the economic and political stalemate over which groups in the United States would bear the burden for the relative decline in the economic and political hegemony of the United States. The stagflation was broken in the early 1980s, and a “neoliberal” SSA was created. While not explicitly discussed in these terms, the Reagan administration attempted to create a new institutional framework, a new SSA, for economic prosperity based on neoliberalism, or deregulated capitalism. Ideologically, the federal government was attacked as the most important cause of the economic problems faced by the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Contemporary Capitalism and its Crises
Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century
, pp. 195 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, Mark and McHugh, Richard 1992. Unprepared for Recession: The Erosion of State Unemployment Insurance Coverage Fostered by Public Policy in the 1980s. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Barbash, Jack 1961. “Union Response to the‘Hard Line’”. Industrial Relations 1, 1: 25–38.Google Scholar
Blum, Albert A. 1968. “Why Unions Grow.” Labor History 9, 1: 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Week 1984. “NLRB Rulings that are Inflaming Labor Relations.” June 11:122–130.
,Congressional Budget Office 2005. “The Role of Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market.” November.
,Congressional Budget Office 2006. “Changes in Low-Wage Labor Markets between 1979 and 2005.”
Dew-Becker, Ian and Gordon, Robert J. 2005. “Where did the Productivity Growth Go? Inflation Dynamics and the Distribution of Income.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 67–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Report of the President 2001. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Economic Report of the President 2005. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Edwards, Richard C. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S. 2005. “What Do We Know About Job Loss in the United States? Evidence from the Displaced Workers Survey, 1984–2004.” Economic Perspectives 2Q: 13–28.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B. 1988. “Contraction and Expansion: The Divergence of Private Sector and Public Sector Unionism in the United States.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 2: 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittleman, Maury B. and Howell, David R. 1995. “Changes in the Structure and Quality of Jobs in the United States: Effects by Race and Gender, 1973–1990.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48, 3: 420–440.Google Scholar
Golden, Lonnie and Appelbaum, Eileen 1992. “What was Driving the 1982–88 Boom in Temporary Employment? Preferences of Workers or Decisions and Power of Employers.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51, 4: 473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, David M., Edwards, Richard and Reich, Michael 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gramlich, Edward M., Kasten, Richard and Sammartino, Frank 1993. “Growing Inequality in the 1980s: The Role of Federal Taxes and Cash Transfers.” Pp. 225–49 in Danziger, Sheldon and Gottschalk, Peter eds. Uneven Tides: Rising Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Bennett and Bluestone, Barry 1990. “Wage Polarization in the US and the ‘Flexibility’ Debate.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 14, 3: 351–73.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Bruce E. 1978. “The Propensity to Strike in American Manufacturing.” Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association: 419–26.Google Scholar
Levitan, Sar A., Carlson, Peter E. and Shapiro, Isaac 1986. Protecting American Workers: An Assessment of Government Programs. Washington DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence, Bernstein, Jared and Schmitt, John 2001. The State of Working America: 2000/2001. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence, Bernstein, Jared and Allegretto, Sylvia 2007. The State of Working America 2006/2007. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Daniel J. B. 1985. “Shifting Wage Norms in Wage Determination.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Congressional Budget Office 1994. “A Decade of Concession Bargaining.” Pp. 435–74 in Kerr, Clark and Staudohar, Paul D. eds. Labor Economics and Labor Relations: Markets and Institutions. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oliner, Steven D., Sichel, Daniel E. and Stiroh, Kevin J. 2007. “Explaining a Productive Decade.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 81–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Sam 1994. “The More Decentralized Mode of Labor Market Regulation in the United States.” Economies et Societes 18, 8: 35–58.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Sam 2003. American Economic Development Since 1945: Growth, Decline and Rejuvenation. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Sam and Lapidus, June 1999. “Contingent and Non-Standard Work in the United States: Towards a More Poorly Compensated, Insecure Workforce.” Pp. 62–83 in Felstead, A. and Jewson, N. eds. Global Trends in Flexible Labor. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Stefanie R. 2000. “Job Security Beliefs in the General Social Survey: Evidence on Long-Run Trends and Comparability with Other Surveys.” Pp. 300–31 in Neumark, David ed. On the Job: Is Long Term Employment a Thing of the Past?New York: Russell Sage Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Christopher 1992. “Dualism in Part-Time Employment.” Industrial Relations 31, 2: 330–47.Google Scholar
,U. S. Bureau of the Census 2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,U. S. Bureau of the Census 2009. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2009. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,U. S. Bureau of Labour Statistics 2000. “Employee Tenure in 2000.” News Release, August 29.
,U. S. Bureau of Labour Statistics 2006. “Employee Tenure in 2006.” News Release, September 8.
,U. S. Bureau of Labour Statistics 2007. “Union Members in 2006.” News Release, January 25.
,U. S. General Accounting Office 1991. “Strikes and the Use of Permanent Strike Replacements in the 1970s and 1980s.” January.
Wenger, John B. 2001. “Divided We Fall: Deserving Workers Slip through America's Patchwork Unemployment Insurance System.”Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×