Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:32:11.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PART I - UNITED STATES COURTS AS INTERNATIONAL COURTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Francisco Forrest Martin
Affiliation:
Rights International, The Center for International Human Rights Law, Inc.
Get access

Summary

Tribunals (or courts) adjudicate disputes between two or more parties by applying laws and/or equity. They declare the legal obligations (if any) existing between the parties, sometimes issue reasoned opinions, and order remedies if such obligations are breached. Some tribunals need not even have an actual dispute to adjudicate to provide a declaration of the law. For example, some courts issue advisory opinions.

Sometimes constitutions, basic law, or statutes create tribunals. Sometimes, personal sovereigns or communities create tribunals. Most importantly, treaties also can create tribunals. For example, the American Convention on Human Rights created the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court. Sometimes an institution operating under the authority of its constituent treaty creates a tribunal. For example, the UN Security Council operating under the authority of the UN Charter created the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and Congress operating under the authority of the Constitution created the federal appellate and district courts.

Because treaties are agreements between two or more states, the tribunals established by these treaties can have jurisdiction over interstate disputes and operate as interstate tribunals. For example, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) sometimes exercises jurisdiction over disputes between states, and the U.S. Constitution gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction over interstate disputes. Given that the Constitution is a treaty between states governing their relations, it should come as no surprise that the federal courts created by the Constitution have an interstate dimension.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Constitution as Treaty
The International Legal Constructionalist Approach to the U.S. Constitution
, pp. 19 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×