Ackrill, J. L. (1963) Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. (1997) ‘An amnesis in the Phaedo: Remarks on 73c–75c’ in Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. (1971) ‘SYMPLOKE EIDON’ repr. in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Garden City ny, 201–9.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (2003) ‘Zeno of Citium and Stoic Cosmology: Some Notes and Two Case Studies’, Elenchos 24: 9–32.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (2015) ‘Place: M 10.1–36’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 184–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (2015) (eds), Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1965) ‘Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues’, in Allen, R. E. (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, New York.Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1966 ) ‘A Note on the Elenchus of Agathon: Symposium 199c–201c’, Monist 50: 462–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1983/1998) Plato’s Parmenides, Oxford.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford.Google Scholar

Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1994/2000) Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Année, M. (2020) Alcméon de Crotone. Fragments. Traité scientifique en prose ou poème médical?, Paris.Google Scholar

Apostle, H. G. (1981) Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Iowa.Google Scholar

Apostolopoulos, Ch. (2007) ‘Die Rolle der Epinoia nach Eunomius und Gregor und die theologisch–philosophischen Hintergründe (CE ii 171–195)’, in Karfikova, L. et al., Gregory of Nyssa Contra Eunomium ii, Suppl. Vigiliae Christianae, Leiden–Boston, 239–46.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1988) (trans.) Plotinus. Ennead VI.6–9, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1981) ‘Lucretius’ Explanation of Moving Dream Figures at 4.768–76’, American Journal of Philology 102: 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method, Ithaca ny and London.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2009) ‘Epicurean Empiricism’, in Warren (2009), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atherton, C. (2005) ‘Lucretius On What Language is Not’, in Frede and Inwood (2005), 101–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atherton, C. (2009) ‘Epicurean Philosophy of Language’, in Warren (2009), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (1963) The Concept of a Person and Other Essays, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Oxford.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le stoïcisme, Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D. and Casevitz, M. (2002) Plutarque : Œuvres morales. Traité 72. Sur les notions communes contre les stoïciens, Paris.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. T. J. (2014) ‘The Structure of Stoic Metaphysics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46: 253–309.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. (2000) Theophrastus Against the Presocratics and Plato. Peripatetic Dialectic in the De sensibus, Leiden, Boston and Cologne.Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. (1997) ‘Plato, Aristotle and the ΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΚ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙ’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 177–206.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1975/1994) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols, Princeton, nj.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Epicurean Signs’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl.: 91–134.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Scepticism and Relativity’, Philosophical Studies 32: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. (1995) ‘Metaphysics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge, 66–108.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Translated with an introduction and commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1993a) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics 2nd ed., Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1993b) ‘Epicurus: Meaning and Thinking’, in Giannantoni and Gigante (1993), 197–220.Google Scholar

Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. N. (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, parte iii: Commentari, Florence, 227–562.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (2005) ‘Force, fermeté, froid: la dimension physique de la vertu stoïcienne’, Philosophie antique 5: 5–30.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. (forthcoming), ‘Epictetus’ Practical Strategy Against Scepticism and the Early Imperial Philosophical Scene’.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (2019) (eds), Dialectic After Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berchmann, R. M. (1984) From Philo to Origen: Middle Platonism in Transition, Chico, CA.Google Scholar

Bertier, J., Brisson, L., Charles, A., Pépin, J., Saffray, H.–D., and Segonds, Ph., (1980) (eds.) Plotin, Traité sur les nombres (Ennéade vi 6 [34]), Paris.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. (2006) ‘Epicurus’ Argument for Atomism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 266–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betegh, G. (2015) ‘Body: M 9.359–440’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 130–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bett, R. (1997) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Ethicists, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (2009) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick (eds.,) The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, vol. 1: Ancient Philosophy of Religion, Durham, UK 173–85.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (2011) ‘How Ethical Can an Ancient Sceptic Be?’, in Diego Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy, 3–17.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (2012) Review of Corti 2009, Ancient Philosophy 32: 217–23.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (2013) ‘The Pyrrhonist’s Dilemma: What to Write if you have Nothing to Say’, in Erler, Michael and Hessler, Jan Erik (eds.,) Argument und Literarische Form in antiker Philosophie, Akten des 3. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2010, Berlin, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bett, R. (2015) ‘God: M 9.13–194’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bett, R. (2019) ‘Humor as Philosophical Subversion, Especially in the Skeptics’, in Destrée, P. and Trivigno, F. (eds.), Laughter, Humor, and Comedy in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 208–26.Google Scholar

Biondi, P. C. (1999) Aristotle, Posterior Analytics ii.19, Montreal.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (1993) ‘Philodemus on the Technicity of Rhetoric’, in Giannantoni and Gigante (1993), 585–96.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. (1991) ‘Nous pathētikos in Later Greek Philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl.: 191–205.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (2015) ‘Time: M 10.169–247’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 275–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodéüs, R. (2001) Aristote: Les Catégories. Traduction et Notes, Paris.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. (2008) Porphyre. Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, Paris.Google Scholar

Boeri, M. D. (2001) ‘The Stoics on Bodies and Incorporeals’, The Review of Metaphysics 54, 723–52.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (1968) ‘Une histoire de σοφίη’, Revue des Études Grecques 81: 550–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollack, J. (1997) ‘Réflexions sur les interprétations du logos héraclitéen’, in Bollack, J., La Grèce de Personne, Paris, Seuil, 288–308 (English translation as ‘The Heraclitean Logos’ in J. Bollack (2016), The Art of Reading. From Homer to Paul Celan, Cambridge ma. and London, 217–45.)Google Scholar

Bolton, R. (1991) ‘Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford, 1–29.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone, Milan.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013) ‘Le commentateur anonyme du Théétète et l’invention du platonisme’, in El Murr, D. (ed.),La mesure du savoir. Études sur le Théétète de Platon, Paris, 309–33.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015) À la recherche des Idées. Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin, Paris.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2017) ‘The Platonist Appropriation of Stoic Epistemology’, in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism. The Development of Philosophy 100BCE–100CE, Cambridge, 120–41.Google Scholar

Bonhöffer, A. (1890) Epiktet und die Stoa. Untersuchungen zur stoischen Philosophie, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Bostock, D. (1986) Plato’s Phaedo, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bostock, D. (1994) ‘Plato on Understanding Language’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought 3. Language, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bown, A. (2016) ‘Epicurus on Truth and Falsehood’, Phronesis 61: 463–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. (1997) ‘Thyrsus–bearer of the Academy or Enthusiast for Platon? Plutarch’s de Stoicorum repugnantiis’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and his Intellectual World, London, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. (1998) ‘Plutarch on KOINOΣ ΛΟΓΟΣ: Towards an Architecture of De Stoicorum Repugnantiis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 299–329.Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. (2001) Post–Hellenistic Philosophy. A Study of its Development from the Stoics to Origen, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. (2005) ‘Alcinoos, Didaskalikos 4. In defence of dogmatism’, in Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.,) L’eredità platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo, Naples, 201–34.Google Scholar

Boys–Stones, G. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B. (1994) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B. (2000) Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge ma.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandom, R. B. (2002) Tales of the Mighty Deads: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Bréal, M. (1913) Essai de sémantique, Paris.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. (1983) The Early Greek Concept of the Soul, Princeton nj.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, T. (2000) ‘Criterion and Appearance in Sextus Empiricus’, in Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica 66, Helsinki, 63–92.Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1862) Von der Mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles, Freiburg.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (1999) ‘Logos et logoi chez Plotin, Leur nature et leur rôle’, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 8: 87–108.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common Sense: Concepts, definition and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Frede and Inwood (2005), 164–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero: On Academic Scepticism, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. and Rowe, C. J. (2002) (trans.) Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bronowski, A. (2013) ‘Epicureans and Stoics on Universals’, in Chiaradonna and Galluzzo (2013), 255–97.Google Scholar

Bronstein, D. (2010) ‘Comments on Gregory Salmieri, ‘Αἴσθησις, Ἐμπειρία and the Advent of Universals in Posterior Analytics ii.1 19’, in Lesher (2010b), 187–94.Google Scholar

Bronstein, D. (2012) ‘The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics ii.19’, Phronesis 57: 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronstein, D. (2016) Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, L. (2012) ‘Negation and Not–Being: Dark Matter in the Sophist’ in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato. Festschrift at Delphi in Honour of C. Kahn, Las Vegas, 269–91.Google Scholar

Brown, L. (2018) ‘Aporia in Plato’s Theaetetus and Sophist’ in Karasmanis, V. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Greek Philosophy, Cambridge, 91–111.Google Scholar

Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (2005) (eds.) Les Catégories et leur histoire, Paris.Google Scholar

Bruns, I. (1887) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora De anima liber cum mantissa. Supplementum Aristotelicum ii pars i, Academia Litterarum Regiae Borussica, Berlin.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1988/1994a) ‘La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprēme’, in Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M. (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics, Naples, 20–127. (English translation: ‘The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology’, in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge 1994, 92–157).Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1988/1994b) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Criterion: The Skeptic as Conceptual Lsegatee’, in Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, 145–75. (Reprinted in J. Brunschwig, Papers In Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, 224–43).Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1990/1994) ‘La formule ὅσον ἐπί τῷ λόγῳ chez Sextus Empiricus’, in Voelke, A. J. (ed.), Le Scepticisme antique, Cahiers de la Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 15, Geneva/Lausanne/Neuchâtel, 107–21. (Reprinted in English translation as ‘The ὅσον ἐπί τῷ λόγῳ Formula in Sextus Empiricus’, in J. Brunschwig, Papers In Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, 244–58).Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Stoic Metaphysics’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge, 206–33.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1959) ‘ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟΝ. Eine semasiologische Studie’, Philologus 103: 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1987) ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A. (1987), 213–40.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2000) ‘Plato on Why Mathematics is Good for the Soul’, in Smiley, T. (ed.), Mathematics and Necessity, Oxford, 1–81.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2002) ‘De anima ii.5’, Phronesis 47: 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. and Frede, M. (1997) (eds.)The Original Sceptics: A Controversy, Indianapolis/Cambridge.Google Scholar

Caluori, D. (2015) Plotinus on the Soul, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cambiano, G. (2012) ‘The Desire to Know (Metaphysics A 1)’ in Steel, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, Oxford, 1–42.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2004) ‘Bootstrapping and the Origin of Concepts’, Daedalus 133: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassin, B. and Narcy, M. (1989), La Décision du sens. Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d’Aristote, introduction, texte, traduction et commentaire, Paris.Google Scholar

Castagnoli, L. (2018) ‘Dialectic in the Hellenistic Academy’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2018), 168–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castelli, L. M. (2013) ‘Universals, Particulars and Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Forms’ in Chiaradonna and Galluzzo (2013), 139–84.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (1998) ‘Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caston, V. (1999) ‘Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 145–213.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (2012) Alexander of Aphrodisias On the Soul. Part 1: Soul as Form of the Body, Parts of the Soul, Nourishment, and Perception, Bristol.Google Scholar

Cattanei, E. (2003) ‘Le matematiche al tempo di Platone e la loro riforma’, in Vegetti, M. (ed.), La Repubblica: Traduzione e Commento Vol V, Libro vi–vii, Naples, 473–539.Google Scholar

Charles, D. (2000) Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford.Google Scholar

Charles, D. (2010a) (ed) Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charles, D. (2010b) ‘The Paradox in the Meno and Aristotle’s Attempt to Resolve It’, in Charles (2010a), ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, M. ( 2010) ‘Porphyry on the Cognitive Process’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1944) Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, 2 vols., Baltimore.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (1976) Plutarch’s Moralia xiii, part ii: 1033A–1086B, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2007) ‘Platonismo e teoria della conoscenza stoica tra ii e iii secolo d.C.’, in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity (eds.), Leuven, 209–41.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2008) ‘What Is Porphyry’s Isagoge?’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 19: 1–30.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2010) ‘La conoscenza dell’ anima discorsiva. Enn. V 3 (49) 2–3’, in Barbanti, M. and Cardullo, L. (eds.), Anima e libertà in Plotino, Catania, 36–64.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2012a) ‘Porphyre. Commentaire aux Harmoniques de Ptolémée’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. T. V/b, De Plotina à Rutilius Rufus. Paris, 1376–81.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2012b) ‘Plotinus’ Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense perception and discursive thought’, Topoi 30: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2016) ‘Porphyry and the Aristotelian Tradition’, in Falcon, Andrea (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle, Leiden, 321–40.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2018) ‘Galen and Middle Platonists on Dialectic and Knowledge’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2018), 320–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G. (2013) (eds.) Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Pisa.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1967) Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Collette, B. (2020) ‘Division et articulation chez Épictète et Marc Aurèle’, in Delcomminette, S. and Van Daele, R. (eds.), La Méthode de division de Platon à Jean Scot Erigène, Paris, 85–104.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. (2009), ‘How are Episodes of Thought Initiated According to Aristotle?’, in Riel, G.V. and Destrée, P.. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Anima, Leuven, 1–17.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K., (2018). ‘Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37 A 2–C 5’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 51–105.Google Scholar

Corkum, P. (2009) ‘Aristotle on Non–Substantial Individuals’, Ancient Philosophy 29: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides: Parmenides’ Way of Truth and Plato’s Parmenides; Parmenides Fragment 2. Translated with Commentary, London.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1965) ‘Mathematics and Metaphysics in Republic v–vii’, in R. E. Allen (1965), 61–96.Google Scholar

Corti, L. (2009) Scepticisme et langage, Paris.Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2007) ‘The Stoics on Definitions and Universals’, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18, 89–122.Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2008) ‘Plato’s Philosophy of Language’ in Fine, G. (ed.),Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford, 217–42.Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on Definition’, in Charles (2010a), 359–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2012) Plato’s Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cross, R. C. and Woozley, A. D. (1966) Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary, London.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2000) Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dancy, R. (2004) Plato’s Introduction of Forms, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Danieìlou, J. (1956) ‘Eunome l’arien et l’exégèse neo–platonicienne du Cratyle’ REG 69: 412–32.Google Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2002) ‘Modifications of the Method of Inquiry in Aristotle’s Physics I.1. An essay on the dynamics of the ancient commentary tradition’ in Leijenhorst, C. H., Lüthy, C. H. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (eds.), The Dynamics of Aristotelian Natural Philosophy, Leiden, 31–56.Google Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2018a) ‘Potentiality in Aristotle’s Psychology and Ethics’ in Engelhard, K. and Quante, M. (eds.), Handbook of Potentiality, Dordrecht, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2018b) ‘Themistius [on the relations between intellects, soul, and body]’ in Marmodoro, A. and Cartwright, S. (eds.), A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity, Cambridge, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2020) ‘Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Active Intellectual Cognition’ in Decaix, V. and Mora Márquez, A.–M. (eds.), Active Cognition. Challenges to an Aristotelian Tradition, Dordrecht, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2021) ‘Deduction and Common Notions in Alexander’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics A 1–2’, History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 24, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. J. (2023) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Ancient Debate on Hylomorphism and the Development of Intellect’ in Charles, D. (ed.), The History of Hylomorphism. From Aristotle to Descartes, Oxford, 174–96.Google Scholar

De Harven, V. (2015) ‘How Nothing Can be Something: The Stoic Theory of Void’, Ancient Philosophy 35: 405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Harven, V. (forthcoming) Everything Is Something: The Unity of Metaphysics, ch. 5.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. and De Lacy, E. A. (1958) ‘Epicurean ἐπιλογισμός’, American Journal of Philology 79: 179–83.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. and De Lacy, E. A. (1978) Philodemus on Methods of Inference, 2nd ed. Naples.Google Scholar

Delattre, D. and Pigeaud, J. (2010) (eds.) Les épicuriens. Bibliothèque de la Pléïade, Paris.Google Scholar

Delcogliano, M. (2010) Basil of Caesarea’s Anti-Eunomian Theory of Names, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delcomminette, S. (2014) ‘Qu’est ce–que l’intelligence selon Platon?’, Revue des études grecques 127: 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, Bd. 3 Teil ii, Analytica Posteriora, Berlin.Google Scholar

Detel, W. (1998) Aristoteles Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, Bd. 3 Teil ii, Analytica Posteriora, Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Berlin (photomechanically reprinted by Berlin, 1965).Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1899) Elementum, eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus, LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Diels, H. (1903) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch von H. Diels (revised by W. Kranz), Berlin, 3 vols. 1951/52⁶ (first edition by Diels Berlin, 1903; reprint of the revised edition 1989¹⁸) = DK.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1996) The Middle Platonists, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2011) ‘The Ideas as Thoughts of God’, Études platoniciennes 8: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, J. (2019) The Roots of Platonism, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2011) Commentary and Tradition. Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy, Berlin.Google Scholar

Dooley, W. E. (1989) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle Metaphysics 1, London.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1987–2008) Der Platonismus in der Antike. (8 vols.), Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt, 6.1–2 (2002).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1980) Symposium, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2013) ‘The Greatest Difficulty at Parmenides 133c–134e and Plato’s Relative Terms’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 43–62.Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2015a) ‘The Role of Relatives in Plato’s Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436b9–439c9’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 37–60.Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2015b) ‘Aristotle’s Two Accounts of Relatives in Categories 7,’ Phronesis 60 (4): 436–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2018) ‘Aristotle’s Categories 7 Adopts Plato’s View of Relativity’, in Warren, J., Wardy, R., and Bryan, J. Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge, 120–28.Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. (2020) Ancient Relativity: Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dye, G. and Vitrac, B. (2009) ‘Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus Empiricus: sources, cible, structure’, Phronesis 54: 155–203.Google Scholar

Dyson, H. (2009) Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (2007) Plotinus on Intellect, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (1988) Plotinus on Sense-Perception, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esfeld, M. (2000) ‘Aristotle’s Direct Realism in De Anima’, Review of Metaphysics 54: 321–36.Google Scholar

Fabricius, A. (1840) Sexti Empirici Opera Graece et Latine, Leipzig. (Revised edition Kuehniana – originally published 1718).Google Scholar

Falcon, A. (2018) ‘Physics i.1’, in Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle´s Physics Book I. A Systematic Exploration, Cambridge, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, M. (2006) ‘Knowledge, Recollection, and the Forms in Republic vii’, in Santas, G. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, Oxford, 214–33.Google Scholar

Ferrari, J. R. F. (1996) ‘La teoria delle idee in Plutarco’, Elenchos 17: 121–42.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1984) ‘Separation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 31–87.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1990) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic 5–7’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology, Cambridge, 85–115, reprinted in G. Fine (1999), 215–46.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1993) On Ideas, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1999) (ed.) Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2000) ‘Sceptical Dogmata: Outlines of Pyrrhonism i 13’, Méthexis 13: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, G. (2010) ‘Sceptical Enquiry’, in Charles (2010a), 342–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, G. (2017) ‘Plato on the Grades of Perception: Theaetetus 184–186 and the Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53: 65–110.Google Scholar

Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (2011) (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrester, J. W. (1974) ‘Arguments and (Sic) Able Man Colud (Sic) Refute: Parmenides 133b–134e’, Phronesis: 233–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. H. F. (1999) The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankena, W. K. (1939) ‘The Naturalistic Fallacy’, Mind 48: 464–74.Google Scholar

Frede, D. (1989) ‘The Soul’s Silent Dialogue: A non-aporetic reading of the Theaetetus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 215: 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, D. (1996) ‘The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus’ in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (2005) (eds.) Language and Learning, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. (1967) Prädikation und Existenzaussage, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1987) ‘Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’ in Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis, 151–76.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1994a) ‘The Stoic Notion of a lekton’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Language, Companions to Ancient Thought 3, Cambridge, 109–28.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1994b) ‘The Stoic Conception of Reason’, in Boudouris, K. (ed.), Hellenistic Philosophy, vol. 2, Athens, 50–63.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999) ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Algra, K. et al. (eds), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. (2005) ‘Les Catégories d’Aristote et les pères de l’église Grecs’ in Bruun and Corti (2005), 135–73.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1990) ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism’ in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology. Companions to Ancient Thought 1, Cambridge, 225–50.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999) ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Algra, K. et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. (1974) The Foundations of Arithmetic, German Text with English Translation by J. L. Austin, Oxford.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1984a) ‘Concept and Object’, in McGuinness, B. (ed.) Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford 182–194.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1984b) ‘Function and Concept’, in McGuinness, B. (ed.) Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford, 137–56.Google Scholar

Fried, M. N. and Unguru, S. (2001) Apollonius of Perga’s Conica: Text, Context, Subtext, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fritz, K. von (1945–1946), ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras)’: Part i. From the Beginnings to Parmenides and Part ii. The Post-Parmenidean Period, Classical Philology 40: 223–42 and 41 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. (1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N. S. vol. 56: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galluzzo, G. (2013) ‘Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’ in Chiaradonna and Galluzzo (2013), 209–54.Google Scholar

Gasser-Wingate, M. (2019) ‘Aristotle on the Perception of Universals’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27: 446–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, P. T. (1956) ‘The Third Man Again’, Philosophical Review 65: 72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (1994) Plotinus, London–New York.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (1999) ‘The Concept in Platonism’, in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism. Essays in Honour of John Dillon, Aldershot, 65–80.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2005) Aristotle and other Platonists, Ithaca ny.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2009) Ancient Epistemology. Key Themes in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2013) From Plato to Platonism, Ithaca ny.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (1996) (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano 3 vols, Naples.Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. (2005) ‘Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Reconsidered’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 43: 223–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, M. L. (2012) Philosophos. Plato’s Missing Dialogue, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, M. L. and Ryan, P. (1996) Plato, Parmenides, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Gladigow, B. (1965) Sophia und Kosmos. Untersuchungen zur Frühgeschichte von sophos und sophiē, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Glasner, R. (1992) ‘Proclus’ Commentary on Euclid’s Definitions 1, 3 and 1, 6’, Hermes, 320–33.Google Scholar

Glidden, D. K. (1983) ‘Epicurean Semantics’, in SYZETESIS: Studi sull’ epicureismo Greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante, 2 vols., Naples, 185–226.Google Scholar

Glidden, D. (1985) ‘Epicurean Prolepsis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3: 175–217.Google Scholar

Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus on Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2, London.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. (1972) ‘Ὑπάρχειν et ὑφιστάναι dans la philosophie stoïcienne’, Revue des Etudes Grecques 95: 331–44.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. (2006) ‘Remarques sur l’origine épicurienne de la “prenotion”’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les Stoïciens et leur logique, 2nd ed., Paris, 41–60.Google Scholar

Gould, J. B. (1970) The Philosophy of Chrysippus, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M-O. and Pépin, J. (2005) ‘Notes sur les Sentences’ (notes on Sentence 16) in Brisson, L. (ed.), Porphyre. Sentences. Paris, 449–457.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2000) La dialectique des stoïciens, Paris.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2019) ‘Stoic Dialectic and its Objects’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2018), 134–67.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. (1977) ‘On Language, Thought and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’ in Graeser, A., Issues in the Philosophy of Language, Past and Present: Selected Papers, Bern, 1999.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. (1978) ‘The Stoic Categories’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les Stoiciens et Leur Logique, Paris, 199–222.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. (1987) (ed.) Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Symposium Aristotelicum, Bern.Google Scholar

Gregorič, P. and Grgić, F. (2006) ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Experience’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackforth, R. (1955) Plato’s Phaedo: Translated with Introduction and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hammerstaedt, J. (1996) ‘Il ruolo della Prolepsis epicurea nell’ interpretazione di Epicuro, Epistula ad Herodotum 37 SG’, in Giannantoni and Gigante (1996), 221–37.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Natural Criteria and the Transparency of Judgement: Antiochus, Philo and Galen on Epistemological Justification’, in Inwood, B. and Frede, D. (eds.), Assent and Argument, Leiden, 161–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2015) ‘Motion: M 10.37–168’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 217–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harari, O. (2006) ‘Methexis and Geometrical Reasoning in Proclus’ Commentary on Euclid’s Elements’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 361–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harari, O. (2011) ‘The Unity of Aristotle’s Category of Relatives’, The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 61: 521–37.Google Scholar

Hare, R. M. (1960) ‘Philosophical Discoveries’, Mind 69: 145–62.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harte, V. (2002) Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harte, V. (2006) ‘Beware of Imitations: Image Recognition in Plato’, in Herrmann, F.-G. (ed.), New Essays on Plato, Swansea, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harte, V. (2007) ‘Language in the Cave’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harte, V. (2008) ‘Plato’s Metaphysics’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford, 191–216.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1983) ‘The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’, in Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle IL, 7–82.Google Scholar

Havrda, M. (2016) The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria, Philosophia Antiqua 144, Leiden.Google Scholar

Havrda, M. (2012) ‘Categories in Stromata viii’, Elenchos 33: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, T. L. (1925) The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, 2nd ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. (1886) Euclid. Opera Omnia Vol. iii, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. (1915) Archimedes, Opera Vol. iii, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heintz, W. (1932) Studien zu Sextus Empiricus, Halle.Google Scholar

Helmig, C. (2009) ‘The Truth can Never be Refuted. Syrianus’ view(s) on Aristotle reconsidered’, in Longo, A. (ed.), Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’Antiquité tardive, Naples, 347–80.Google Scholar

Helmig, C. (2012) Forms and Concepts. Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengstermann, C. (2016) Origenes und der Ursprung der Freiheitsmetaphysik, Münster.Google Scholar

Hood, P. (2004) Aristotle on the Category of Relation, Lanham, MD,Google Scholar

Horn, C. (1995) Plotin über Sein, Zahl und Einheit, Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffman, C. (2005) Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huismann, T. (2016) ‘Aristotle on Accidental Causation’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2: 561–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hultsch, F. (1877) Pappus. Collectionis Quae Supersunt Vol. ii., Berlin.Google Scholar

Hultsch, F. (1878) Pappus. Collectionis Quae Supersunt Vol. iii., Berlin.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. (1986) The Virtues of Aristotle, London and New York.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2011) ‘The Notion of enargeia in Hellenistic Philosophy’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds), Episteme etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford, 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2015) ‘Wholes and Parts: M 9.331–358’, in Algra and Ierodiakonou (2015), 105–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2018) ‘Dialectic as a Subpart of Philosophy’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2018), 114–33.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2019) (ed.) Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus. Special issue of Rhizomata: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 7.2.Google Scholar

Imbert, C. (2006) ‘Théorie de la représentation et doctrine logique dans le stoïcisme ancien’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les Stoïciens et leur logique, 2nd ed., Paris, 79–108Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2005) ‘Getting to Goodness’ in Reading Seneca. Stoic Philosophy at Rome, Oxford, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Moral Theory, Oxford.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1995) Plato’s Ethics, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (2006) ‘Socrates and Euthyphro: The Argument and Its Revival’ in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates, Oxford.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (2019) ‘The Platonic Corpus’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jackson-McCabe, M. (2004) ‘The Stoic Theory of Implanted Preconceptions’, Phronesis 49: 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. (1998) From Metaphysics to Ethics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus: On Poems I, Oxford.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2012) The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2017) ‘Aristotle on the Logos of the Craftsman’, Phronesis 62: 97–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. M. (1926) ‘The Ideas as the Thoughts of God’, Classical Philology 21: 317–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jouanna, J. (2003), Hippocrate, La maladie sacrée,, Paris.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. (1981) ‘The Role of Nous in the Cognition of First Principles in Posterior Analytics ii.19’ Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science, Padua, 385–414.Google Scholar

Kalligas, P. (2011) ‘The Structure of Appearances: Plotinus on the Constitution of Sensible Objects’, The Philosophical Quarterly 61: 762–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karamanolis, G. (2016) ‘Early Christian Philosophers on Aristotle’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle, Leiden, 460–79.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. (2021) Philosophy of Early Christianity, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karfikova, L. (2007) ‘Der Ursprung der Sprache nach Eunomius und Gregor vor dem Hintergrund der Antiken Sprachtheorien CE ii 387–444, 543–553’, in Karfikova, Douglas and Zachhuber (2007), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karfikova, L., Douglas, S. and Zachhuber, J. (2007) (eds), Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium ii, Suppl. to VC 82, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kechagia, E. (2011) Plutarch against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kechagia, E. (2017) ‘Plutarch’s Dialogues: Beyond the Platonic Model?’, in Cameron, A. and Gaul, N. (eds.), Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium, London–New York, 8–19.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. (2010) ‘Concepts, Brains, and Behaviour’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 81: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerschensteiner, J. (1962) Kosmos. Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern, Munich.Google Scholar

King, R. (2004) Aristoteles De Memoria et Reminiscentia, Berlin.Google Scholar

King, R. (2009) Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, J. (2011) Review of H. Dyson’s Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa, Journal of the History of Philosophy 49: 115–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleingünther, A. (1933) Prōtos heurētēs, Untersuchungen zur Geschichte einer Fragestellung Philologus Suppl. 26/1, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Knorr, W. R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems, Boston.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2008) ‘Commentary on Morel’ Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 49–54.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1990) ‘The More and the Full: On the Reconstruction of Parmenides’ Theory of Sensation in Theophrastus, De Sensibus, 3–4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 8: 1–18.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1999) ‘Soul, Sensation and Thought’, in Long, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge, 250–70.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2018) ‘How Preplatonic Worlds Became Ensouled’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 1–33.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2019) ‘The Lever, or How to Act at a Distance: A backdrop to Theophrastus’ De sensibus’, in Ierodiakonou (2019), 168–87.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2023) ‘Autour d’une charnière (Parménide B8.50-61 DK = D8.55–66LM). Une discussion posthume avec Jean Bollack’, Dionysius 39, 1–35.Google Scholar

Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (2016), Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Lanza, D. (1964) L’enkephalos e la dottrina anassagorea della conoscenza, Maia 16: 71–78.Google Scholar

Lautner, P. (2009) ‘Different Types of logoi and their Place in Empirical Knowledge and Noetic Understanding in Syrianus’, Ancient Philosophy 29: 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lautner, P. (2015) ‘Mental Images in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics’, Apeiron 48: 220–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavaud, L. (2006) ‘La dianoia médiatrice entre le sensible et l’intelligible’, Études Platoniciennes 3: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, F. (2010) ‘Being and Power in Plato’s Sophist’, Apeiron 43: 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1973) ‘The Meaning of NOUS in the Posterior Analytics’, Phronesis 18: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (1994) ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 1–34.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (2010a) ‘Just as in Battle’: The Simile of the Rout in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics ii 19’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (2010b) (ed.) From Inquiry to Demonstrative Knowledge. New Essays on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Apeiron 18/2–3 (special issue).Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (2010c) ‘Comments on Tuominen, ‘Back to Posterior Analytics ii 19: Aristotle on the Knowledge of Principles’, in Lesher 2010b, 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévy, C. (1984) ‘La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres ii et iv du De finibus’, Revue des Études latines 62, 111–27.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (1986) ‘Le “scepticisme” de Philon d’Alexandrie: une influence de la Nouvelle Acadèmie ?’, in Caquot, A., Hadas-Lebel, M., Riaud, J. (eds.), Hellenica et Judaica. Hommage à Valentin Nikiprowtzky, Paris, 29–41.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. A. (1979) ‘Parmenides on Separation and the Knowability of the Forms: Plato Parmenides 133aff’, Philosophical Studies 35: 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linguiti, A. (1990) L’ ultimo platonismo greco. Principi e conoscenza, Florence.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lo Presti, R. (2009) ‘Between Distinction and Separation. Rethinking the centrality of the brain in Alcmaeon’s theory of sense-perception and cognition’, in Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption 19: 9–30.Google Scholar

Lo Presti, R. (2010) ‘The Matter of Sense, the Sense of Matter: What does the enkephalos-hermeneus perform in On the Sacred Disease’s encephalocentric doctrine?’, Rhizai 7: 147–80.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1971) ‘Aisthēsis, Prolēpsis and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18: 114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. (1988) ‘Ptolemy on the Criterion. An epistemology for the practicing scientist,’ in Dillon, J. and Long, A.A. (eds.), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley CA, 176–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Longo-Aurrichio, F. (1977) Φιλοδήμου Περὶ Ρητορικῆς libros primum et secundum, Naples.Google Scholar

Loux, M. J. (2009) ‘Aristotle on Universals’ in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, Oxford, 186–96.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, New York.Google Scholar

Mann, W. R. (2000) The Discovery of Things. Aristotle’s Categories and their Context, Princeton nj.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1994) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2003a) ‘Aspects of Epicurean Theology’, Mnemosyne 46: 172–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2003b) ‘Zeno on the Unity of Philosophy’, Phronesis 48: 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2014) ‘Ps.Plutarch/Aëtius Plac. 4.11. Some Comments on Sensation and Concept Formation in Stoic Thought’, Mnemosyne 67: 613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. (2020) Aetiana V. An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts, 4 vol., Leiden.Google Scholar

Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs, Bonn.Google Scholar

Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (2011) ‘Concepts’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/Google Scholar

Martijn, M. (2010a) ‘Proclus on the Order of Philosophy of Nature’, Synthese 174: 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martijn, M. (2010b) Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and Its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Leiden–Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mateo-Seco, L. F. and Maspero, G. (2009) The Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa, Leiden.Google Scholar

McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton nj.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, R. (1983) ‘Aristotelian Epagōgē in Prior Analytics ii.21 and Posterior Analytics I.1,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, R. (1992) Principles and Proofs. Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton nj.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. (1993) ‘Epicurean Doxography in Cicero, De natura deorum Book I’, in Giannantoni and Gigante (1993), 865–78.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. (2018) ‘As in a Battle when a Rout has Occurred (Posterior Analytics 2.19, 100a12)’ in Sfendoni-Menzou, D. (ed.), Aristotle – Contemporary Perspectives on his Thought. On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth, Berlin, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherran, M. (1983) ‘Plato’s Parmenides’ Theory of Relations’, in Pelletier, F. J. and King-Farlow, J. (eds.), Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9, Supplementary Volume. New Essays on Plato, Guelph, Ontario, 149–64.Google Scholar

Meinwald, C. (2016 ) Plato, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S. (1995) ‘Metaphysics, Dialectic, and the Categories’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100: 311–37.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (1999) ‘The Stoic Theory of Categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (2002) ‘Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of the De Anima’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S. (forthcoming) The Aim and Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics.Google Scholar

Mignucci, M. (1986) ‘Aristotle’s Definitions of Relatives in Cat. 7’, Phronesis 31: 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mignucci, M. (1988) ‘The Stoic Notion of Relatives’, in Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M. (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, Naples, 129–221.Google Scholar

Modrak, D. K. W. (1987) Aristotle. The Power of Perception, Chicago.Google Scholar

Morales, F. (1994) ‘Relational Attributes in Aristotle’, Phronesis 39: 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moraux, P. (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, vol. 2: Der Aristotelismus im i. und ii. Jh. n. Chr., Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moraux, P. (2000) L’aristotelismo presso I greci, Temi metafisici e problemi del pensiero antico, vol. 82, Milan.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1962) ‘Being and Meaning in the Sophist’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 14: 23–78.Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2008) ‘Method and Evidence: On Epicurean Preconception’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 25–48.Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2013) Lecture du Contre Colotès de Plutarque, Aitia 3, online May 30, 2013, accessed July 19, 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/599; DOI : 10.4000/aitia.599Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1986) ‘Pindar, O. 2.83–90’, Classical Quarterly 36: 304–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1973), ‘Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things’ in Mourelatos, A. P. D., The Route of Parmenides (revised and expanded edition), Las Vegas, 2008, 299–332.Google Scholar

Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Geometry and Scepticism’, in Barnes, J. and Brunschwig, J. (eds.) Science and Speculation, Cambridge, 69–95.Google Scholar

Mueller, I. (1983) ‘Parmenides 133a–134e: Some Suggestions’, Ancient Philosophy 3: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, I. (1995) ‘Syrianus and the Concept of Mathematical Number’, in Bechtle, G. and O’ Meara, D. J. (eds.), La philosophie des mathématiques de l’antiquité tardive, Fribourg, 72–83.Google Scholar

Mueller, I. (1991) ‘Mathematics and Education: some notes on Platonic programme’ in Mueller, I. (ed.), ‘Peri Tōn Mathēmatōn’, Apeiron 24: 85–104.Google Scholar

Mure, G. R. G. (1928) ‘The Marriage of Universals’, Philosophy (11): 313–23.Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. (1911) ‘Inhaltsangabe und Kapitelüberschrift im antiken Buch’, Hermes 46: 93–107.Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H., rev. Mau, J. (1958) Sexti Empirici Opera, vol.1, Purrhōneiōn Hupotupōseis, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Natali, C. (1995) ‘Oikonomia in Hellenistic Political Thought’, in Laks, A., A. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Political Philosophy, Cambridge, 95–128.Google Scholar

Nawar, T. (2017) ‘The Stoics on Identity, Identification, and Peculiar Qualities’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32: 113–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1975) ‘Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World’, American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 105–17.Google Scholar

Németh, A. (2017) Epicurus on the Self, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Netz, R. (2002) ‘It’s Not That They Couldn’t’, Revue d’histoire des mathématiques: 263–89.Google Scholar

Netz, R. (2009) Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Netz, R. (2017) ‘Mathematical Concepts? The View from Ancient History’, in de Freitas, E., Sinclair, N., Coles, A. (eds.), What is a Mathematical Concept, Cambridge, 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Netz, R. (2020) Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Netz, R., Saito, K. and Tchernetska, T. (2002–2003) ‘A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest’, SCIAMVS 2: 9–29, 3, 109–126.Google Scholar

Noble, C. I. (2016) ‘Plotinus Unaffectible Soul’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 231–81.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The Atheism of Epicurus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 187–223.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1992) ‘What All Men Believe – Must Be True: Common Conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 192–232.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus ‘On Piety’ Part 1, Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. (2013) ‘Forms and Concepts’, in Moutsopoulos, E. and Protopapas-Marneli, M. (eds.), Plato, Poet and Philosopher. In Memory of Ioannis Theodorakopoulos, Athens, 193–244.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. (1989) Pythagoras Revived, Oxford.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism, Brussels.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2017) ‘Is Plutarch Really Hostile to the Stoics’, in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism. The Development of Philosophy 100bce–100ce, Cambridge, 296–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1957). ‘A Proof in the Peri Ideon’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 103–11.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1965) ‘Inherence’, Phronesis 10: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1970) ‘Plato on Not-Being’, in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato. A Collection of Critical Essays, Vol. I, London, 223–67. Reprinted in Fine (1999), 416–54.Google Scholar

Pasquino, P. (1978) ‘Le statut ontologique des incorporels dans l’ancien stoicisme’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les stoiciens et leur logique, Paris, 333–46.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. (1997) Sextus Empiricus, Esquisses pyrrhoniennes: Introduction, traduction et commentaires, Paris.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. (2005) Aristote. Seconds Analytiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Penner, T. (1973a) ‘Socrates on Virtue and Motivation’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. (eds.), Exegesis and Argument: Essays for Gregory Vlastos, Phronesis, Supp. I, 133–51.Google Scholar

Penner, T. (1973b) ‘The Unity of Virtue’, Philosophical Review 82: 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penner, T. (1992) ‘Socrates in the Early Dialogues’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge, ch. 4.Google Scholar

Perin, C. (2010) ‘Scepticism and Belief’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge, 145–64.Google Scholar

Peterson, S. (1981) ‘The Greatest Difficulty for Plato’s Theory of Forms: The Unknowability Argument of Parmenides 133c–134c’, Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 63: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, J. (1987) ‘Stoic “common notions” in Plotinus’, Dionysius 11: 33–52.Google Scholar

Pigeaud, J. (1980) ‘Quelques aspects du rapport de l’âme et du corps dans le Corpus hippocratique’, in Grmek, M. D. (ed.), Hippocratica. Actes du 3ième Colloque international hippocratique, Paris, 417–33.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1939) ‘Plutarchs Schriften gegen die Stoiker’, Hermes 74: 1–33. Republished in M. Pohlenz (1965), Kleine Schriften I, Hildesheim, 448–80.Google Scholar

Primavesi, O. (2012) ‘Aristotle, Metaphysics A: A New Critical Edition with Introduction’, in Steel 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prinz, J. (2006) ‘Concepts’, in Borchert, Donald M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed., Detroit, 414–30.Google Scholar

Prior, W. J. (1985) Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics, London.Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, A. (2009), Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity, Oxford Early Christian Studies, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, A. (2010) ‘Epinoia and Initial Concepts: Re-assessing Gregory of Nyssa’s defense of Basil’ Studia Patristica xlvii, Leuven.Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, A. (2018) Gregory of Nyssa’s Doctrinal Works. A Literary Study, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge ma.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reesor, M. E. (1957) ‘The Stoic Categories’, The American Journal of Philology 78: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, K. (1912) ‘Hekataios von Abdera und Demokrit’, in Reinhardt, K.., Vermächtnis der Antike. Gesammelte Essays zur Philosophie und Geschichtsschreibung, Göttingen. Reprinted in 1960, Göttingen, 114–32.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2018) ‘Pithana and Probabilia ’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2018), 218–53.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2019) ‘Linguistic Naturalism in Cicero’s Academica’, in Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, Cambridge, 153–70.Google Scholar

Remes, P. (2007) Plotinus on Self. The Philosophy of the ‘We’, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (2013) ‘The Old Academy, the Stoics, Antiochus of Ascalon, and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus’, in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics, Cambridge, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rini, E. (2010) ‘L’analisi Aristotelica Dei Relativi’, Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia 4: 623–56.Google Scholar

Robertson, C. (2004) ‘Chrysippus on Mathematical Objects’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roskam, G. (2012) ‘Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (In Phd. i 275–92 and ii 28)’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 52: 469–92.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1924) (ed.) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1949) (ed.) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Rowett, C. (2018) Knowledge and Truth in Plato, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudolph, K. (2011) ‘Democritus’ Perspectival Theory of Vision’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 131: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runciman, W. G. (1962) Plato’s Later Epistemology, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1946) A History of Western Philosophy, London.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind, London.Google Scholar

Saito, K. (1985) ‘Book ii of Euclid’s Elements in the Light of the Theory of Conic Sections,’ Historia Scientiarum: 31–60.Google Scholar

Salmieri, G. (2010) ‘Αἴσθησις, Ἐμπειρία and the Advent of Universals in Posterior Analytics ii 19’ in Lesher 2010, 155–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and prolepsis in the Stoic Theory of Knowledge’, Classical Quarterly 24: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandford, S. (2010) Plato and Sex, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Santoro, (2000) [Demetrio Lacone]. [La forma del dio] (PHerc. 1055), Naples.Google Scholar

Sassi, M.–M. (1978) Le teorie della percezione in Democrito, Florence.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1980) ‘Preconception, Argument and God’ in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J. (eds), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford, 283–308.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1984) ‘Ariston of Chios and the Unity of Virtue’, Ancient Philosophy 4: 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Likeness and Likenesses in the Parmenides’, in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford, 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. (1997) ‘APXH’, Hyperboreus 3: 218–36.Google Scholar

Schoppe, C. (1994), Plutarchs Interpretation der Ideenlehre Platons Münsteraner Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie Vol. 2, Münster.Google Scholar

Schreckenberg, H. (1964) Ananke. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Wortgebrauchs, Munich.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P. (1991a) ‘A Middle Platonic Reading of Plato’s Theory of Recollection’, Ancient Philosophy 11: 103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrenk, L. P. (1993) ‘The Middle Platonist Reception of Aristotelian Science’, Rheinisches Museum 136: 342–59.Google Scholar

Schultz, J. (2019) ‘Contradictory Appearances in Plato’s Republic’, Ancient Philosophy 39: 69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, D. (1988) ‘Innatism and the Stoa’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 33: 123–53.Google Scholar

Scott, D. (1995) Recollection and Experience. Plato’s Theory of Learning and its Successors, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1985) ‘The Stoic Theory of Universals’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1993) ‘A Platonist Reading of the Theaetetus’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society – Suppl. 67: 125–49.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1996a), ‘Three Platonist Interpretations of the Theaetetus’ in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1996b) ‘Alcinous’ epistemology’, in Algra, K., van der Horst, P. and Runia, D. (eds.), Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday, Leiden, 300–12.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1998a) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1998b) ‘Platonic Causes’, Phronesis 43: 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2002) ‘Aristotelian Relativities’ in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le Style de La Pensée: Receuil de Textes En Hommage à Jacques Brunschwig, Paris, 324–52.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2005) ‘Stoic Metaphysics at Rome’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics in Ancient Thought, Oxford, 117–42.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2006a) ‘Plato on Language’ in Benson, H. H. (ed.), A Companion to Plato, London.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2006b) ‘The Speech of Agathon in Plato’s Symposium’, in Reis, B. (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, Cambridge, 47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N (2007) ‘Equal Sticks and Stones’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford, 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2011) ‘Epicurus’ Theological Innatism’, in Fish and Sanders (2011), 29–52.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2013a) ‘Plato and the One-over-Many Principle’, in Chiaradonna and Galluzzo (2013), 113–37.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2013b) ‘The theoretikos bios in Alcinous’, in Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.), Theoria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden, 163–81.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2016) ‘An Introduction to Plato’s Theory of Forms’ in O’Hear, A. (ed.), The History of Philosophy, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78, Cambridge, 3–22.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2018) ‘Epicurean Theories of Knowledge’, in Verde, F. and Catapano, M. (eds.), Lexicon Philosophicum. International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas. Special Issue: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge, Rome, 106–21.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2019) ‘Epicurus on Dialectic’, in Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge, 82–113.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2021) ‘Lucretius on Imagination and Mental Projection’, AITIA online journal.Google Scholar

Sefrin-Weis, H. (2010) Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection, Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1989) ‘The Criterion of Truth in Philo Judaeus, Alcinous, and Alexander of Aphrodisias’, in Huby, P. and Seal, G. (eds.), The Criterion of Truth. Essays written in Honour of George Kerferd, Liverpool, 231–56.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1990) Alexander of Aphrodisias Ethical Problems, London.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias Supplement to On the soul, Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, London.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2005) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts’, Phronesis 50: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2008) Alexander Aphrodisiensis De anima libri mantissa. A new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar

Shields, C. (2016) Aristotle De anima, Oxford.Google Scholar

Shoppe, C. (1994) Plutarchs Interpretation der Ideenlehre Platons, Münster.Google Scholar

Shorey, P. (1935) The Republic. 2 vols., Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Sidoli, N. (2015) ‘Mathematics Education,’ in Bloomer, W. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Education, Oxford, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sieben, H. (1998) ‘Vom Heil in den vielen Namen Christi zur Nachahmung derselben. Zur Rezeption der Epinoiai-Lehre des Origenes durch die kappadokischen Väter’, Theologie und Philosophie 73: 1–28.Google Scholar

Silverman, A. (2002) The Dialectic of Essence, Princeton nj.Google Scholar

Sirkel, R. (2011) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’s Account of Universals and Its Problems’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 49: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaveva-Griffin, S., (2009), Plotinus on Numbers, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, M. F. (1992) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Naples.Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (2003) Supplement to Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Naples.Google Scholar

Smith, R. (2000) ‘Aristotle’s Logic’, in Zalta, E. N. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1924) Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie, Berlin. Reprint New York 1976.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1952) Der Aufbau der Sprache, Hamburg.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1953) The Discovery of the Mind; the Greek Origins of European Thought, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1992) ‘Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception’ in Rorty, A. O. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford, 195–225.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2004) Aristotle on Memory (2nd ed.) Bristol.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2006), ‘Universals Transformed: The First Thousand Years after Plato’, in Strawson, P. F. and Chakrabarty, A. (eds.), Universals, Concepts and Qualities. New Essays on the Theory of Predication, Aldershot–Burlington, 105–27.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2010), ‘The Ancient Commentators on Concept Formation’, in de Haas, F. A. J., Leunissen, M. and Martijn, M. (eds.), Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond, Leiden–Boston, 3–26.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. C. (2001) ‘Metaphysics Without Conceptual Analysis’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72: 631–6.Google Scholar

Steel, C., (1978) The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus, Brussels.Google Scholar

Steel, C. G. (1997) ‘Breathing Thought. Proclus on the Innate Knowledge of the Soul’, in Cleary, J. (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism. Leuven, 293–309.Google Scholar

Steel, C. (2012) (ed.) Aristotle’s Metaphysics A, with an Edition of the Greek Text by O. Primavesi, Oxford.Google Scholar

Steel, C. G. (2018) ‘“The soul never thinks without a phantasm”. How Platonic Commentators Interpret a Controversial Aristotelian Thesis’, in Strobel, B. (ed.), Die Kunst der philosophischen Exegese bei den spätantiken Platon- und Aristoteles-Kommentatoren, Berlin, 185–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenzel, J. (1921/1956) ‘Über den Einfluss der griechischen Sprache auf die philosophische Begriffsbildung’, in Stenzel, J., Kleine Schriften zur griechischen Philosophie, Darmstadt (1956), 72–84. [= Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum, Geschichte und deutsche Litteratur und für Pädagogik 24, 1921, 152–64]Google Scholar

Strange, S. K., (1994), ‘Plotinus on the Nature of Eternity and Time’, in Schrenk, L. P. (ed.), Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Washington DC, 22–53.Google Scholar

Stratton, G. M. (1917), Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle, London (photomechanical reprint 1967 Chicago).Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1974) ‘Κριτήριον τῆς ἀληθείας‘, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 2: 48–110. Reprinted in Striker (1996), 22–76.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1996) Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Studer, B. (2007) ‘Der theologiegeschichtliche Hintergrund der Epinoiai-Lehre Gregors von Nyssa’ in Karfikova, Douglas, Zachhuber (2007), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taormina, D. (1993) ‘Dynamique de l’écriture et processus cognitive dans la néoplatonisme (Jamblique, Plutarque d’Athènes, Priscien de Lydie et Proclus)’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), Contre Platon, I. Le platonisme dévoilé, Paris, 215–45.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism. The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (1993) Thrasyllan Platonism, Ithaca ny.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2005) Recollecting Plato’s Meno, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (1998) ‘Platonic Ethics’ in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought: Ethics, Cambridge, ch.3.Google Scholar

Taylor, B. (2016) ‘Definition and Ordinary Language in Cicero De Finibus 2’, Classical Philology 111: 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, W., and Junge, G. (1930) The Commentary of Pappus on Book X of Euclid’s Elements. Cambridge ma.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thümmel, H. G. (2011) Origenes’ Johanneskommentar Buch I–V, Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T. (1996) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul. Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books ii–iii, Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar

Todd, R. B. (1973) ‘The Stoic Common Notions: A Re-Examination and Reinterpretation’, Symbolae Osloenses 48: 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Towey, A. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle. On Sense Perception, London.Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. and Forster, E. S., (1960) Posterior Analytics. Topica, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. (1966) Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge ma.Google Scholar

Tricot, J. (1970) Aristote. Organon IV Les seconds analytiques, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar

Trizio, M. (2008) ‘Neoplatonic Source-material in Eustratios of Nicaea’s Commentary on Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics’, in Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, Leiden, 71–110.Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2006) ‘Philodemus and the Epicurean Tradition’, in Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), Philosophers, Politicians, and Patrons, Rome, 341–400.Google Scholar