Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-w5x57 Total loading time: 0.66 Render date: 2022-07-02T03:11:38.374Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

6 - To What Extent Are Phonological Inventories Complex Systems?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Salikoko S. Mufwene
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Christophe Coupé
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
François Pellegrino
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Complexity in Language
Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 135 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, W. Ross. 1947. Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System. Journal of General Psychology 37: 125128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, Quentin D. 2011a. Phonemic Diversity Supports Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa. Science 332: 346349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, Quentin D. 2011b. Linking Spatial Patterns of Language Variation to Ancient Demography and Population Migrations. Linguistic Typology 15(2): 321332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, Ching-Pong. 2008. Acquisition and Evolution of Phonological Systems. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav, and Hochberg, Yosef. 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57(1): 289300.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2011. How Plausible Is the Hypothesis that Population Size and Dispersal are Related to Phoneme Inventory Size? Introducing and Commenting on a Debate. Linguistic Typology 15(2): 147153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancho, Ramon Ferrer I., and Solé, Ricard V.. 2001. The Small-World of Human Language. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 268: 22612266.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. Nick. 2003a. Feature Economy in Sound Systems. Phonology 20: 287333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. Nick. 2003b. Feature Economy as a Phonological Universal. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, 371374.Google Scholar
Coupé, Christophe, Marsico, Egidio, and Pellegrino, François. 2009. Structural Complexity of Phonological Systems. Approaches to Phonological Complexity, Phonology & Phonetics Series vol. 16, ed. by Pellegrino, François et al., 141169. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coupé, Christophe, Marsico, Egidio, and Philippson, Gérard. 2011. How Economical are Phonological Inventories? Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Dahl, Osten. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Bart. 2000. Self-Organization in Vowel Systems. Journal of Phonetics 28(4): 441465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Bart, and Zuidema, Willem H.. 2005. Multi-Agent Simulations of the Evolution of Combinatorial Phonology. BNAIC 2005 – Proceedings of the 17th Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Brussels, Belgium, 6673.
De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert in collaboration with Riedlinger, Albert, translated by Baskin, Wade. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Dorogovtsev, Sergey N., and Mendes, José F. F.. 2001. Language as an Evolving Word Web. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 268: 26032606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S., and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2011. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available at http://wals.info/.Google Scholar
Dunn, Olive J. 1961. Multiple Comparisons among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56: 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, Bruce. 1999. What is Complexity? The Philosophy of Complexity per se with Application to Some Examples in Evolution. The Evolution of Complexity, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009. The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud, and Fenk, August. 2005. Cross-linguistic Correlations Between Size of Syllables, Number of Cases, and Adposition Order. Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, ed. by Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud and Winkler, Christian, 7586. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray, and Lloyd, Seth. 2003. Effective Complexity. Nonextensive Entropy – Interdisciplinary Applications, ed. by Gell-Mann, Murray, & Tsallis, Constantino, 387398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Yosef. 1988. A Sharper Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significance. Biometrika 75(4): 800802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Yosef, and Tamhane, Ajit C.. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, Sture. 1979. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6(2): 6570.Google Scholar
Jensen, Pablo. 2006. Network-Based Predictions of Retail Store Commercial Categories and Optimal Locations. Phys. Rev. E 74: 035101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ke, Jinyun, Gong, Tao, and Wang, William Shi-Yuan. 2008. Language Change and Social Networks. Communications in Computational Physics 3(4): 935949.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan, and Lindblom, Bjorn. 1972. Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast. Language 48: 839862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn, MacNeilage, Peter, and Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1983. Self-Organizing Processes and the Explanation of Phonological Universals. Explanations for Language Universals, ed. by Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard, and Dahl, Östen, 181203. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn, and Maddieson, Ian. 1988. Phonetic Universals in Consonant Systems. Language, Speech and Mind, ed. by Li, Charles and Hyman, Larry, 6278. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary, and Dale, Rick. 2010. Language Structure is Partly Determined by Social Structure. PLoS ONE 5(1): 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2006. Correlating Phonological Complexity: Data and Validation. Linguistic Typology 10(1): 106–23.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2009. Calculating Phonological Complexity. Approaches to Phonological Complexity, Phonology and Phonetics Series, vol. 16, ed. by Pellegrino, François et al., 85110. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2011. Phonological Complexity and Linguistic Patterning. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian, and Precoda, Kristin. 1990. Updating UPSID. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74: 104111.Google Scholar
Marsico, Egidio, Maddieson, Ian, Coupé, Christophe, and Pellegrino, François. 2004. Investigating the ‘Hidden’ Structure of Phonological Systems. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30: 256–67.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius, and Karlsson, Fred (eds.). 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Mark. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1980. Chairman's Introduction to Symposium on Phonetic Universals in Phonological Systems and Their Explanation. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1979, 184185.
Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves. 2006. Self-Organization in the Evolution of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, François, Marsico, Egidio, Chitoran, Ioana, and Coupé, Christophe (eds.). 2009. Approaches to Phonological Complexity. Phonology & Phonetics Series vol. 16. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Franz. 1998. The Co-Variation of Phonology with Morphology and Syntax: A Hopeful History. Linguistic Typology 2(2): 195230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2009. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saville, Dave J. 1990. Multiple Comparison Procedures: The Practical Solution. American Statistician 44: 174180.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Boë, Louis-Jean, Vallée, Nathalie, and Abry, Christian. 1997. The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of Vowel Systems. Journal of Phonetics 25(3): 255286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shosted, Ryan K. 2006. Correlating Complexity: A Typological Approach. Linguistic Typology 10(1): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šidák, Zbyněk. 1967. Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62(31): 626633.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 1996. Self-Organising Vocabularies. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 1997. The Synthetic Modeling of Language Origins. Evolution of Communication 1(1): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallée, Nathalie. 1994. Systèmes Vocaliques: De la Typologie aux Prédictions. Thèse de doctorat. Grenoble: Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1961. Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×