Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-wh2kg Total loading time: 0.766 Render date: 2022-06-27T21:21:40.619Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

1 - Complexity in Language: A Multifaceted Phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Salikoko S. Mufwene
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Christophe Coupé
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
François Pellegrino
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Complexity in Language
Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 1 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboh, Enoch O. & Smith, Norval, eds. 2009. Complex Processes in New Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan, & Corbett, Greville, eds. 2015. Understanding Morphosyntactic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bane, Max. 2008. Quantifying and Measuring Morphological Complexity. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J., 6976. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Richard, Blythe A., et al. 2009. Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper. In Ellis, & Larsen-Freeman, (eds.), 126.
Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2009. On the Evolution of Complexity: Sometimes Less is More in East and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 3449.
Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard A. & Croft, William. 2009. A Usage-Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis. In Ellis, & Larsen-Freeman, (eds.), 4763.
Bréal, Michel Jules Alfred. 1897. Essai de Sémantique: Science des Significations. Paris: (Original publisher unknown).Google Scholar
Coupé, Christophe. 2016. Commentary: Defining and Assessing Constraints on Linguistic Forms. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1): 5255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupé, Christophe, Marisco, Egidio, & Pellegrino, François. 2009. Structural Complexity of Phonological Systems. In Pellegrino, et al. (eds.), 141169.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2009. Towards a Social Cognitive Linguistics. In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Evans, Vyvyan & Pource, Stéphanie, 395420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 2013. Grammar and Complexity: Language at the Intersection of Competence and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2010. Complexity Scales and Licensing in Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2009. Testing the assumption of complexity invariance: The case of Elfadian and Swedish. In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 5063.
DeGraff, Michel. 2001a. On the Origin of Creoles: A Cartesian Critique of neo-Darwinian Linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5: 213310.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2009. Language Acquisition in Creolization (and Language Change): Some Cartesian-Uniformitarian Guidelines. Language and Linguistics Compass 3&4: 888971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutcher, Guy. 2009. “Overal Complexity”: A Wild Goose Chase? In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 243251.
Dor, Daniel. 2015. The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, Bruce. 1999. What is Complexity? The Philosophy of Complexity per se with Application to some Examples in Evolution. In The Evolution of Complexity, ed. by Heylighen, Francis, Bollen, Johan, & Riegler, Alexander, 118. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane, eds. 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas & Klein, Thomas B., eds. 2009. Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge Publications.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 2011. Orientation Systems of the North Pacific Rim. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Gearheard, Shari, Pocernich, Matthew, Stewart, Ronald, Sanguya, Joelie, & Huntington, Henry P.. 2010. Linking Inuit Knowledge and Meteorological Station Observations to Understand Changing Wind Patterns at Clyde River, Nunavut. Climatic Change 100(2): 267294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray. 2003. Effective Complexity. In Nonextensive Entropy – Interdisciplinary Applications, ed. by Gell-mann, Murray & Tsallis, Constantino, 387398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gershenson, Carlos, ed. 2008. Complexity: 5 Questions. Denmark: Automatic Press.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2001. Creoles, Complexity, and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology 5: 325371.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2009. How Much Grammar Does it Take to Sail a Boat? In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 1933.
Givón, T. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. & Shibatani, Masayoshi, eds. 2009. Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2005. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Hohn A. 2009. An Efficiency Theory of Complexity and Related Phenomena. In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 252268.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1959. Animal “Languages” and Human Language. Human Biology 31: 3239.Google ScholarPubMed
Housen, Alex, Kuiken, Folkert, & Vedder, Ineke, eds. 2012. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, eds. 2012. Linguistic Complexity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2009. Ceaseless, Unpredictable, Creativity. Biolinguistics 3: 6192.Google Scholar
Kretzchmar, William A Jr. 2015. Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Namhee, Lee, Mikesell, Lisa, Joaquin, Anna Dina L., Mates, Andrea W., & Schumann, John H.. 2009. The Interactional Instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liebertman, Philip. 2012. The Unpredictable Species: What Makes Humans Unique. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupian, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language Structure is Partly Determined by Social Structure. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F. 1998. The Frame/Content Theory of Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(4): 499511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddieson, Ian 2011. Phonological Complexity in Linguistic Patterning. In Proc. of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1721.Google Scholar
Massip-Bonet, Angels & Bastardas-Boada, Albert, eds. 2012. Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2001. The World's Simplest Grammars are Creole Grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2012. Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius, & Karlsson, Fred. 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1996. Creolization and Grammaticization: What creolistics Could Contribute to Research on Grammaticization. In Changing Meanings, Changing Functions, ed. by Baker, Philip and Syea, Anand, 528. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2009. Postscript: Restructuring, Hybridization, and Complexity in Language Evolution. In Aboh, & Smith, (eds.), 367399.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2012. The Emergence of Complexity in Language: An Evolutionary Perspective. In Massip-Bonet, & Bastardas-Boada, (eds.), 197218.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2013. Language as Technology: Some Questions that Evolutionary Linguistics Should Address. In In Search of Universal Grammar: From Norse to Zoque, ed. by Lohndal, Terje, 327358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufweme, Salikoko S. in press. The Evolution of Language as Technology: The Cultural Dimension, in Beyond the Meme, ed. by Wimsatt, William & Love, Alan. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. & Preston, Laurel B., eds. 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. & Preston, Laurel B.. 2014. Introduction. In Newmeyer, & Preston, (eds.), 113.
Palmer, Bill. 2007. Pointing at the Lagoon: Directional Terms in Oceanic Atoll-Based Languages. In Language Description, History and Development. Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley, ed. by Siegel, Jeff, Lynch, John, & Eades, Diana, 101118. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, François, Coupé, Christophe & Marsico, Egidio. 2011. A Cross-Language Perspective on Speech Information Rate. Language 87(3): 539558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, François, Marsico, Egidio, Chitoran, Ioana, & Coupé, Christophe, eds. 2009. Approaches to Phonological Complexity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, Henri. 1891. Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. Bulletin Astronomique 8: 1224.Google Scholar
Risager, Karen. 2006. Language and Culture: Global Flows and Local Complexity. Clevdon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Jorma. 1978. Modeling by Shortest Data Description. Automatica 14(5): 465471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Peter. 2011. Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2009. A Linguistic Axiom Challenged. In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 118.
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David, & Trudgill, Peter, eds. 2009. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. Understanding Verbal Understanding. In What is Intelligence? ed. by Khalfa, Jean, 179198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre. 2002. Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading. Mind and Language 17: 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, Luc. 1998. Synthesising the Origins of Language and Meaning Using Co-evolution, Self-Organisation and Level Formation. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive bases, ed. by Hurford, James R., Knight, Chris, & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, 384404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 2011a. Modeling the Cultural Evolution of Language. Physics of Life Reviews 8: 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steels, Luc, ed. 2011b. Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, Luc, ed. 2012. Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, Steven. 2003. Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. New York: Theia.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2009. Sociolinguistic Typology and Complexification. In Sampson, et al. (eds.), 98109.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Victorri, Bernard. 1994. La Construction Dynamique du Sens. In Passion des Formes: Dynamique Qualitative, Sémiophysique et Intelligibilité, ed. by Porte, Michèle, 733747. Fontenay-Saint Cloud: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Walther, Géraldine & Sagot, Benoît. 2011. Modélisation et Implémentation de Phénomènes Non-Canoniques. In Traitement Automatique des Langues, 52(2) (Vers la morphologie et au-delà), Hathout, N. & Namer, F. (eds.), p. 91122.Google Scholar
Wang, William Shi-Yuan, Ke, Jinyun, & Minett, James W.. 2004. Computational Studies of Language Evolution. In Computational Linguistics and Beyond, ed. by Huang, C. R., & Lenders, W., 65106. Academia Sinica: Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, ed. by Lehman, Winfred P. & Malkiel, Yakov, 97195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
5
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×