Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:11:50.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Related markets: probation – how not to do it

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

Get access

Summary

Seeing off competition

The Probation Service, the sister service of HMPS, provides some interesting parallels. Remarkably, the service was barely exposed to competition for 20 years after the first privately run prison opened. In 2006, less than 3% of probation work was contracted out (HL Deb 21 May 2006, c443).

There were various reasons for this. Until 2007, government had no power to contract for probation services. Probation failures never attracted quite the same media interest, even though they threatened the public in a way prison failures did not – as with the murders of John Monkton and Naomi Bryant in 2005, and Laurent Bonomo and Gabriel Ferez in 2008. The probation officers’ union, Napo, though adept at protecting its members’ interests, did not exercise the malign influence of the POA. Probation spending was around a quarter of prison spending in 2002–03, and although resources rose – operational staff more than doubled over 1997–2006 (Oldfield and Grimshaw, 2010) – demand-led spending on probation never worried the Treasury in the way prison spending did. Commercially, it was not very attractive – more than half of probation areas were spending under £10 million a year in 2002–03 (HC Deb 27 June 2002, 1072 WA) – and with little scope for PFI. And the Probation Service was not exactly being left alone – being successively reshaped, first by the creation of the National Probation Service in 2001, the creation of NOMS in 2004, and transformation from probation areas into Trusts from 2007 on.

In 2006, government published a manifesto for competing probation – 10% of work to be contracted out within two years (Home Office, 2006b). In 2007, the Offender Management Act finally gave government power to compete probation work. But the Probation Service's monopoly was stoutly defended by the liberal establishment, and ministers were forced to back down. The only major competition was contracting out of unpaid work in London, to SERCO, in 2012.

Kenneth Clarke's proposals, 2012

That immunity was bound to crumble after 2010, with the fiscal crisis and the advent of a Conservative-led government committed to rolling back the State. Kenneth Clarke, back as Justice Secretary, published proposals, ‘Punishment and reform’, which envisaged Probation Trusts becoming commissioning agents, with a much greater role for private and third sector providers (MoJ, 2012a, 2012b).

Type
Chapter
Information
Competition for Prisons
Public or Private?
, pp. 237 - 252
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×