Bibliography

Abraham, A (2008a) ‘The Ombudsman and Individual Rights’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, A (2008b) ‘The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role?’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamson, S & Hughes, R (1991) ‘Shall We Dance? Steps for Legislators and Judges in Statutory Interpretation’ (1991) 75 Minnesota Law Review 1045Google Scholar

Ackerman, B (2000) ‘The New Separation of Powers’ (2000) 113 Harvard Law Review 633Google Scholar

Ackerman, B (2010) ‘Good-bye, Montesquieu’ in Rose-Ackerman, & Lindseth, (eds.) Comparative Administrative Law: An Introduction (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, E (2021) ‘Judicial Discretion and the Declaration of Incompatibility: Constitutional Considerations in Controversial Cases’ 2021 Public Law 311Google Scholar

Adams, E & Bower, E (2022) ‘Notwithstanding History: The Rights-Protecting Purposes of Section 33 of the Charter’ (2022) 26 Review of Constitutional Studies 121Google Scholar

Ahmed, F, Albert, R & Perry, A (2019) ‘Judging Constitutional Conventions’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, F, Albert, R & Perry, A (2020) ‘Enforcing Constitutional Conventions’ (2020) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, R (2008) ‘Advisory Review: The Reincarnation of the Notwithstanding Clause’ (2008) 45 Alberta Law Review 1037Google Scholar

Albert, R (2009) ‘The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism’ (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, R (2010) ‘Presidential Values in Parliamentary Democracies’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, R (2018) ‘The Desuetude of the Notwithstanding Clause – And How to Revive It’ in MacFarlane, (ed.) Policy Change, Courts, and the Canadian Constitution (University of Toronto Press)Google Scholar

Albert, R & Pal, M (2018) ‘The Democratic Resilience of the Canadian Constitution’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (1993) Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2006a) ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference”’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, TRS (2006b) ‘Publication Review: Our Republican Constitution’ [2006] Public Law 172Google Scholar

Allan, TRS (2013) The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, TRS (2014) ‘Accountability to Law’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Allison, J (1994) ‘Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law Journal 367Google Scholar

Allison, J (2007) The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, G & Verba, S (1989) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Sage Publishing)Google Scholar

Amery, L (1964) Thoughts on the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Amos, M (2004) ‘R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Anderson: Ending the Home Secretary’s Sentencing Role’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastaplo, G (2004) ‘Loyal Opposition in a Modern Democracy’ (2004) 35 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 1009Google Scholar

Anderson, D (2014) ‘The Independent Review of Terrorism Laws’ [2014] Public Law 403Google Scholar

Appleby, G (2012) ‘The Evolution of a Public Sentinel: Australia’s Solicitor-General’ (2012) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 397Google Scholar

Appleby, G (2016) ‘Reform of the Attorney General: Comparing Britain and Australia’ [2016] Public Law 573Google Scholar

Appleby, G (2017) ‘Horizontal Accountability: The Rights-Protective Promise and Fragility of Executive Integrity Institutions’ (2017) 23 Australian Journal of Human Rights 168Google Scholar

Appleby, G, MacDonnell, V & Synot, E (2020) ‘The Pervasive Constitution: The Constitution outside the Courts’ (2020) 48 Federal Law Review 437Google Scholar

Appleby, G & Olijnyk, A (2017) ‘Parliamentary Deliberation on Constitutional Limits in the Legislative Process’ (2017) 40 University of New South Wales Law Journal 976Google Scholar

Appleby, G & Olijnyk, A (2020) ‘Executive Policy Development and Constitutional Norms: Practice and Perceptions’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnardóttir, O (2017) ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9Google Scholar

Atiyah, P (1988) ‘Judicial Legislative Relations in England’ in Katzmann, (ed.) Judges and Legislators: Towards Institutional Comity (Brookings Institution)Google Scholar

Axelrod, R (1990) The Evolution of Cooperation (Penguin)Google Scholar

Axworthy, T (2007) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause: Sword of Damocles or Paper Tiger?’ (2007) 25 Policy Options 58Google Scholar

Bailey, D (2020a) ‘Bridging the Gap: Legislative Drafting Practice and Statutory Interpretation’ [2020] Public Law 220Google Scholar

Bailey, D (2020b) ‘Interpreting Parliamentary Inaction’ (2020) 79 Cambridge Law Journal 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, D (2010) Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar

Baker, D (2019) ‘A Feature, Not a Bug: A Coordinate Moment in Canadian Constitutionalism’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Balkin, J (2008) ‘Constitutional Hardball and Constitutional Crises’ (2008) 26 Quinnipiac Law Review 579Google Scholar

Balkin, J (2016) ‘The Framework Model and Constitutional Interpretation’ in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Balkin, J (2018) ‘Constitutional Crisis and Constitutional Rot’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bamforth, N (2013) ‘Accountability of and to the Legislature’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baraggia, A, Fasone, C & Vanoni, L (2020) New Challenges to the Separation of Powers: Dividing Power (Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barak, A (2006) The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Barak, A (2010) ‘Proportionality and Principled Balancing’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 1Google Scholar

Barak, A (2012) Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, N (2001) ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’ (2001) 60 Cambridge Law Journal 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, N (2013) ‘Self-Defence for Institutions’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal 558Google Scholar

Barber, N, Hickman, T & King, J (2017) ‘Reflections on Miller’ (2017) 8 United Kingdom Supreme Court Yearbook 212Google Scholar

Barendt, E (1995) ‘Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government’ [1995] Public Law 599Google Scholar

Barendt, E (1997) ‘Is There a UK Constitution?’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 137Google Scholar

Barendt, E (1998) An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroš, J, Dufek, P & Kosař, D (2020) ‘Unpacking the Separation of Powers’ in Baraggia, , Fasone, & Vanoni, (eds.) New Challenges to the Separation of Powers (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Barrett, A (2010) ‘Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency’ (2010) 90 Boston University Law Review 109Google Scholar

Barrett, A (2017) ‘Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty’ (2017) 32 Constitutional Commentary 61Google Scholar

Bar-Siman-Tov, I (2011) ‘The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process’ (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 1915Google Scholar

Bar-Siman-Tov, I (2015) ‘The Role of Courts in Improving the Legislative Process’ (2015) 3 Theory and Practice of Legislation 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsotti, V, et al. (2017) Italian Constitutional Justice in Global Context (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Basten, J (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality – an Unhelpful Label?’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar

Bates, E (2014) ‘Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg’ (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E (2015) ‘Sophisticated Constructivism in Human Rights Compliance Theory’ (2015) 25 European Journal of International Law 1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E (2017) ‘Democratic Override (or Rejection) and the Authority of the Strasbourg Court: The UK Parliament and Prisoner Voting’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bates, E (2019) ‘Principled Criticism and a Warning from the “UK” to the ECtHR?’ in Breur, (ed.) Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments: A New Paradigm? (Springer)Google Scholar

Bateup, C (2006) ‘The Dialogic Promise’ (2006) 71 Brooklyn Law Review 1109Google Scholar

Bateup, C (2007) ‘Expanding the Conversation: American and Canadian Experiences of Constitutional Dialogue in Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 21 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Bateup, C (2009) ‘Reassessing the Dialogic Possibilities of Weak-Form Bills of Rights’ (2009) 32 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 529Google Scholar

Bator, P (1990) ‘The Constitution as Architecture: Legislative and Administrative Courts under Article III’ (1990) 65 Indiana Law Journal 233Google Scholar

Bauman, R & Kahana, T, eds. (2006) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Beatson, J (1998) ‘The Need to Develop Principles of Prematurity and Ripeness for Review’ (1998) 3 Judicial Review 79Google Scholar

Beatson, J (2013) ‘Human Rights and Judicial Technique’ in Masterman, & Leigh, (eds.) The United Kingdom’s Statutory Bill of Rights: Constitutional and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Beatson, J (2021) The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Bejan, T (2017) Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration (Harvard University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J (2016) ‘Comparative Law and Fundamental Rights’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Bell, J (2020) ‘Common Law Constitutional Rights and Executive Action’ in Elliott, & Hughes, (eds.) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Bellah, R, et al. (2008) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (University of California Press)Google Scholar

Bellamy, R (2011) ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act’ (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, C (2022) ‘Boris Johnson’s Future: A Philosophical Exercise for a Wavering MP’ The Conversation article (1 June 2022). Available at: https://theconversation.com/boris-johnsons-future-a-philosophical-exercise-for-wavering-tory-mps-184106Google Scholar

Bennion, F (2001) Understanding Common Law Legislation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bentham, J (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor John Bowring vol. 2 (W. Tait)Google Scholar

Benton, M & Russell, M (2012) ‘Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons’ [2012] Parliamentary Affairs 1Google Scholar

Berger, R (1997) Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment (Liberty Fund)Google Scholar

Bethlehem, D (2012) ‘The Secret Life of International Law’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 23Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C (2006) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bickel, A (1961) ‘The Supreme Court 1960 Term. Foreword: The Passive Virtues’ (1961) 75 Harvard Law Review 40Google Scholar

Bickel, A (1986) The Least Dangerous Branch 2nd ed. (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Bingham, T (2000) The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches 1985–1999 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bingham, T (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act’ (2010) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 568Google Scholar

Bingham, T (2011) Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches 2000–2010 (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Binnie, I (2013) ‘Judging the Judges: “May They Boldly Go Where Ivan Rand Went Before’ (2013) 26 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 5Google Scholar

Birch, D (2003) ‘Untangling Sexual History Evidence: A Rejoinder to Professor Temkin’ [2003] Criminal Law Review 370Google Scholar

Bjorge, E (2016) ‘Common Law Rights: Balancing Domestic and International Exigencies’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 220Google Scholar

Blackburn, D (2011) ‘Davis and Straw Unite against Prisoner Voting Rights’ The Spectator (18 January 2011)Google Scholar

Blackbourn, J (2012) ‘Evaluating the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation’ [2012] Parliamentary Affairs 1Google Scholar

Blackstone, W (2016 [1765–69]) Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Blair, T (2011) Tony Blair: A Journey (Arrow Books)Google Scholar

Blakeney, A (2006) ‘Judges: Canada’s New Aristocracy – An Interview with Alan Blakeney’ (2006) 18 Inroads 31Google Scholar

Blakeney, A (2010) ‘The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter and Canada’s Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing’ (2010) 19 Constitutional Forum 1Google Scholar

Blick, A & Hennessy, P (2019) ‘Good Chaps No More? Safeguarding the Constitution in Stressful Times’ The Constitution Society blogpost (18 November 2019). Available at: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/good-chaps-no-more-safeguarding-the-constitution-in-stressful-times-by-andrew-blick-and-peter-hennessy/Google Scholar

Blondel, J (1970) ‘Legislative Behaviour: Some Steps towards a Cross-National Measurement’ (1970) 5 Government & Opposition 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blunkett, D (2003) ‘It’s Time for Judges to Learn Their Place’ News of the World (23 February 2003)Google Scholar

Blunkett, D (2006) The Blunkett Tapes: My Life in the Bearpit (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar

Bobbitt, P (1982) Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bogg, A (2018) ‘Judicial Power and the Left: Deference, Partnership, and Defiance’ (9 January 2018) in Ekins, & Gee, (eds.) Judicial Power and the Left: Notes on a Sceptical Tradition (Policy Exchange). Available at: https://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/alan-bogg-judicial-power-and-the-left-deference-partnership-and-defiance/Google Scholar

Bogg, A (2022) ‘Can We Trust the Courts in Labour Law? Stranded Between Frivolity and Despair’ (2022) 38 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law 103Google Scholar

Bowcott, O (2017) ‘Lord Chief Justice Attacks Liz Truss for Failing to Back Article 50 Judges’ The Guardian (22 March 2017)Google Scholar

Bowcott, O (2020) ‘Legal Profession Hits Back at Johnson over “Lefty Lawyers” Speech’ The Guardian (2 October 2020). Available at: www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/06/legal-profession-hits-back-at-boris-johnson-over-lefty-lawyers-speechGoogle Scholar

Bowman, G (2005) ‘Why Is There a Parliamentary Counsel?’ (2005) 26 Statute Law Review 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, A & Ewing, K (2011) Constitutional and Administrative Law, 15th rev ed. (Longman)Google Scholar

Bradley, C & Siegel, N (2017) ‘Historical Gloss, Constitutional Conventions, and Judicial Separation of Powers’ (2017) 105 Georgetown Law Journal 255Google Scholar

Brady, A (2012) Proportionality and Deference: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratman, M (1992) ‘Shared Cooperative Activity’ (1992) 101 Philosophical Review 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratman, M (2014) Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Brazier, A & Fox, R (2011) ‘Reviewing Select Committee Tasks and Modes of Operation’ 2011 Parliamentary Affairs 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brazier, R (2020) ‘Contempt for the Constitution’ UK Constitutional Law Association blogpost (6 October 2020). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2020/10/06/rodney-brazier-contempt-for-the-constitution/Google Scholar

Brems, E (2017) ‘The “Logics” of Procedural-Type Review by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Brenncke, M (2018) Judicial Law-Making in English and German Courts: Techniques and Limits of Statutory Interpretation (Intersentia)Google Scholar

Bright, M & Hinsliff, G (2001) ‘Chaos: How War on Terror Became a Political Dogfight’ The Observer (11 September 2001)Google Scholar

Brogan, B (2005) ‘Blair: Judges Let Us Down’ The Daily Mail (27 July 2005)Google Scholar

Brosseau, L & Roy, M-A (2018). The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter: Background Paper. Service, PIaR. Ottawa, Canada, Library of Parliament.Google Scholar

Brown, S (1994) ‘Public Interest Immunity’ 1994 Public Law 579Google Scholar

Brown, S (2020) Playing off the Roof and other Stories: A Patchwork of Memories (Marble Hill London)Google Scholar

Browne-Wilkinson, N (1992) ‘The Infiltration of a Bill of Rights’ [1992] Public Law 397Google Scholar

Brunnée, J & Toope, S (2010) Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bulman-Pozen, J & Gerken, H (2009) ‘Uncooperative Federalism’ (2009) 118 Yale Law Journal 1256Google Scholar

Burgess, S (1992) Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates (University of Kansas Press)Google Scholar

Burnett, I (2018) ‘Becoming Stronger Together’ Paper presented at Commonwealth Judges and Magistrates’ Association Annual Conference 2018. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar

Burrows, A (2018) Thinking about Statutes: Interpretation, Interaction, Improvement (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, R (1992) The Constitution in Conflict (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Caird, JS (2012) ‘Parliamentary Constitutional Review: Ten Years of the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution’ [2012] Public Law 4Google Scholar

Caird, J, Hazell, R & Oliver, D (2015) The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords Select Committees on the Constitution (The Constitution Society)Google Scholar

Calhoun, C (2000) ‘The Virtue of Civility’ (2000) 29 Philosophy and Public Affairs 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, D (2019) For the Record (William Collins)Google Scholar

Cameron, J (2001) ‘Dialogue and Hierarchy in Charter Interpretation: A Comment on R. v. Mills’ (2001) 38 Alberta Law Review 1051Google Scholar

Cameron, J (2004) ‘The Charter’s Legislative Override: Feat or Figment of the Constitutional Imagination’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (LexisNexis Canada)Google Scholar

Cameron, J (2016) ‘Collateral Thoughts on Dialogue’s Legacy as Metaphor and Theory: A Favourite from Canada’ (2016) 35 University of Queensland Law Journal 157Google Scholar

Campbell, T (1999) ‘Human Rights: A Culture of Controversy’ (1999) 26 Journal of Law & Society 6Google Scholar

Campbell, T (2001) ‘Incorporation through Interpretation’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, T (2011) ‘Parliamentary Review with a Democratic Charter of Rights’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, T, Ewing, K & Tomkins, A, eds. (2001) Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Campbell, T, Ewing, K & Tomkins, A, (2011) ‘Introduction’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Cane, P (2016) Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Cardozo, B (1921) The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2009) The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2011) ‘The Relationship between Judicial Remedies and the Separation of Powers: Collaborative Constitutionalism and the Suspended Declaration of Invalidity’ (2011) 46 Irish Jurist 180Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2016a) ‘Dialogue Isn’t Working: The Case for Collaboration as a Model of Legislative–Judicial Relations’ (2016) 36 Legal Studies 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carolan, E (2016b) ‘Leaving Behind the Commonwealth Model of Rights Review: Ireland as an Example of Collaborative Constitutionalism’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Right-Based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Carolan, E (2017) ‘A Dialogue-Oriented Departure in Constitutional Remedies? The Implications of NHV v Minister for Justice for Inter-Branch Roles and Relationships’ (2017) 40 Dublin University Law Journal 191Google Scholar

Cartabia, M (2016) ‘Of Bridges and Walls: The “Italian Style” of Constitutional Adjudication’ (2016) 1 Italian Journal of Public Law 37Google Scholar

Cartabia, M (2020) ‘Editorial: Courts’ Relations’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 3Google Scholar

Carter, M (2019) ‘Diefenbaker’s Bill of Rights and the “Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty”: The Notwithstanding Clause and Fundamental Justice as Touchstones for the Charter Debate’ (2019) 82 Saskatchewan Law Review 121Google Scholar

Carter, S (1998) Civility: Manners, Morals, and the Etiquette of Democracy (Harper Collins)Google Scholar

Casey, C (2019) ‘The Constitution outside the Courts – The Case for Parliamentary Involvement in Constitutional Review’ (2019) 61 Irish Jurist 36Google Scholar

Casey, C (2021) ‘The Law Officers: The Relationship between Executive Lawyers and Executive Power in Ireland and the United Kingdom’ in Doyle, , McHarg, & Murkens, (eds.) The Brexit Challenge for Ireland and the UK: Constitutions under Pressure (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Casey, C & Kenny, D (2022) ‘The Gatekeepers: Executive Lawyers and the Executive Power in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2022) 20 International Journal of Constitutional Law 664Google Scholar

Cash, W (2005) ‘Terrorism and the Rule of Law’ The Times (2 August 2005)Google Scholar

Chafetz, J (2011) ‘The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment’ (2011) 124 Harvard Law Review Forum 1Google Scholar

Chafetz, J & Pozen, D (2018) ‘How Constitutional Norms Break Down’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 1430Google Scholar

Chan, C (2014) ‘Business as Usual: Deference in Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-Terrorism Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Chan, C (2017) ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’ (2017) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 851Google Scholar

Chan, C (2018) ‘Rights, Proportionality and Deference: A Study of Post-Handover Judgments in Hong Kong’ (2018) 48 Hong Kong Law Journal 51Google Scholar

Chandrachud, C (2014) ‘Reconfiguring the Discourse on Political Responses to Declarations of Incompatibility’ [2014] Public Law 624Google Scholar

Chandrachud, C (2017) Balanced Constitutionalism: Courts and Legislatures in India and the United Kingdom (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Chandrachud, C & Kavanagh, A (2016) ‘Rights-Based Constitutional Review in the UK: From Form to Function’ in Bell, & Paris, (eds.) Rights-Based Constitutional Review (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Chang, B & Ramshaw, G (2017) Strengthening Parliamentary Capacity for the Protection and Realisation of Human Rights (Westminster Foundation for Democracy)Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J (2006) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar

Chen, B (2015) ‘The Principle of Legality: Issues of Rationale and Application’ (2015) 41 Monash University Law Review 329Google Scholar

Christiano, T (2000) ‘Waldron on Law and Disagreement’ (2000) 19 Law and Philosophy 520Google Scholar

Cicero, M (2000) Cicero: On Obligations Translated by Walsh (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Clark, T (2022) ‘Peter Hennessy: Boris Johnson Has Killed off the “Good Chaps” Theory of Government’ Prospect (21 January 2022). Available at: www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/peter-hennessy-interview-good-chaps-theory-of-government-boris-johnsonGoogle Scholar

Claus, L (2005) ‘Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation of Powers’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, R (2004) ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ 2004 Public Law 33Google Scholar

Clements, L (2005) ‘Winners and Losers’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coenen, D (2001) ‘A Constitution of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values with Second-Look Rules of Interbranch Dialogue’ (2001) 42 William and Mary Law Review 1575Google Scholar

Coenen, D (2009) ‘The Pros and Cons of Politically Reversible “Semisubstantive” Constitutional Rules’ (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 2835Google Scholar

Coffin, F (1988) ‘Judicial Balancing: The Protean Scales of Justice’ (1988) 63 New York University Law Review 16Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M & Porat, I (2013) Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Cohler, A, Miller, B & Stone, H (1989) Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Cohn, M (2007) ‘Judicial Activism in the House of Lords: A Composite Constitutionalist Approach’ [2007] Public Law 95Google Scholar

Cohn, M (2013) ‘Sovereignty, Constitutional Dialogues, and Political Networks: A Comparative and Conceptual Study’ in Rawlings, , Leyland, & Young, (eds.) Sovereignty and the Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Cohn, M (2016) ‘Tension and Legality: Towards a Theory of the Executive Branch’ (2016) 39 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colón-Ríos, J (2012) Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the question of constituent power (Routledge)Google Scholar

Colón-Ríos, J (2014) ‘A New Typology of Judicial Review of Legislation’ (2014) 3 Global Constitutionalism 143Google Scholar

Conger, J (2008) The Necessary Art of Persuasion (Harvard Business Press)Google Scholar

Cooke, R (2004) ‘The Road Ahead for the Common Law’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 273Google Scholar

Cooper, J & Marshal-Williams, A (2000) Legislating for Human Rights: The Parliamentary Debates on the Human Rights Bill (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Cossman, B (2019) ‘Same-Sex Marriage beyond Charter Dialogue: Charter Cases and Contestation within Government’ (2019) 69 University of Toronto Law Journal 183Google Scholar

Coughlan, S (2003) ‘Justification in the Face of Competing Social and Political Philosophies’ (2003) 5 Criminal Reports 208Google Scholar

Coxon, B (2014) ‘Human Rights at Common Law: Two Interpretive Principles’ (2014) 35 Statute Law Review 35Google Scholar

Coyne, A (2017) ‘Notwithstanding Clause Is a Bottle Labelled ‘Drink Me’ That Cheapens the Charter’ The National Post (3 May 2017)Google Scholar

Craig, P (2010) ‘Political Constitutionalism and Judicial Review’ in Forsyth, et al. (eds.) Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Craig, P (2013) ‘The Nature of Reasonableness’ (2013) 66 Current Legal Problems 131Google Scholar

Craig, P (2017) ‘Miller, Structural Constitutional Review and the Limits of Prerogative Power’ [2017] Public Law 48Google Scholar

Craig, P (2020) ‘The Supreme Court, Prorogation and Constitutional Principle’ 2020 Public Law 248Google Scholar

Craiutu, A (2012) A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830 (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Craiutu, A (2017) Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes (University of Pennsylvania Press)Google Scholar

Cranston, R (2013) ‘Lawyers, MPs and Judges’ in Feldman, (ed.) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Crawford, C (2013) ‘Dialogue and Declarations of Incompatibility under Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2013) 25 Denning Law Journal 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, C (2014) ‘Dialogue and Rights-Compatible Interpretations under Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2014) 25 King’s Law Journal 34Google Scholar

Crewe, E (2005) Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar

Crewe, E (2015a) Commons and Lords: A Short Anthropology of Parliament (Haus Curiosities)Google Scholar

Crewe, E (2015b) The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar

Crewe, E (2021) The Anthropology of Parliaments: Entanglements in Democratic Politics (Routledge)Google Scholar

Crick, B (1990) ‘The Reform of Parliament’ in Norton, (ed.) Legislatures (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Croley, S (1995) ‘The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law’ (1995) 62 University of Chicago Law Review 689Google Scholar

Cross, R (1995) Statutory Interpretation ed. Bell, & Engels, (Butterworths)Google Scholar

Crowe, E (1983) ‘Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons’ (1983) 45 Journal of Politics 907Google Scholar

Culbertson, A (2022) ‘Boris Johnson Changes Ministerial Code so Those Who Breach It Don’t Have to Quit or Face Sack’ report on Sky News (27 May 2022). Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-changes-ministerial-code-so-those-who-breach-it-dont-have-to-quit-or-face-sack-12622599Google Scholar

Cyr, H (2014) ‘Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism’ (2014) 23 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 20Google Scholar

da Silva, VA (2011) ‘Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daintith, T & Page, A (1999) The Executive in the Constitution: Structure, Autonomy, and Internal Control (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Daly, P (2012) A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Daly, T (2017) The Alchemists: Questioning Our Faith in Courts as Democracy-Builders (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dann, P (2005) ‘Thoughts on a Methodology of European Constitutional Law’ (2005) 6 German Law Journal 1453Google Scholar

Dann, P (2019) ‘Governments’ in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Davies, S (1984) ‘Truth-Values and Metaphors’ (1984) 42 Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 291Google Scholar

Davis, F (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act and Juridification: Saving Democracy from Law’ (2010) 30 Politics 91Google Scholar

Davis, F (2014a) ‘Parliamentary Supremacy and the Re-Invigoration of Institutional Dialogue in the UK’ (2014) 67 Parliamentary Affairs 137Google Scholar

Davis, F (2014b) ‘The Politics of Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: Creating Effective Parliamentary Scrutiny’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, F & de Londras, F, eds. (2014a) Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Davis, F & de Londras, F , (2014b) ‘Introduction: Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: Beyond Dichotomies’ in Davis, & De Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates in Counter-terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Davis, F & Mead, D (2014) ‘Declarations of Incompatibility, Dialogue and the Criminal Law’ (2014) 43 Common Law World Review 62Google Scholar

Dawson, M (1992) ‘The Impact of the Charter on the Public Policy Process and the Department of Justice’ (1992) 30 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 595Google Scholar

de Búrca, G (1993) ‘The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law’ (1993) 13 Yearbook of European Law 105Google Scholar

de Jouvenel, B (1966) ‘The Means of Contestation’ (1966) 1 Government & Opposition 155Google Scholar

de Londras, F (2013) ‘Declarations of Incompatibility under the ECHR Act 2003: A Workable Transplant?’ (2013) 35 Statute Law Review 50Google Scholar

de Londras, F (2017) ‘In Defence of Judicial Innovation and Constitutional Evolution’ in Cahillane, , Hickey, & Gallen, (eds.) Judges, Politics and the Irish Constitution (Manchester University Press)Google Scholar

de Londras, F & Davis, F (2010) ‘Controlling the Executive in Times of Terrorism: Competing Perspectives on Effective Oversight Mechanisms’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19Google Scholar

de Visser, M (2004) Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Bloomsbury/Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

de Visser, M (2022) ‘Non-Judicial Constitutional Interpretation: The Netherlands’ in Law, (ed.) Constitutionalism in Context (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Delaney, E (2014) ‘Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom’ (2014) 108 Northwestern University Law Review 543Google Scholar

Delaney, E (2016) ‘Analyzing Avoidance: Judicial Strategy in Comparative Perspective’ (2016) 66 Duke Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Determan, L & Heinzten, M (2018) ‘Constitutional Review of Statutes in Germany and the United States Compared’ (2018) 28 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 95Google Scholar

Devins, N (2017) ‘Why Congress Does Not Challenge Judicial Supremacy’ (2017) 58 William & Mary Law Review 1495Google Scholar

Devins, N & Fisher, L (2015) The Democratic Constitution 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Devlin, P (1976) ‘Judges and Lawmakers’ (1976) 39 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar

Dicey, AV (1964) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 10th ed. (Macmillan)Google Scholar

Dickson, J (2001) Evaluation and Legal Theory (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Dickson, J (2015a) ‘Ours Is a Broad Church: Indirectly Evaluative Legal Philosophy as a Facet of Jurisprudential Inquiry’ (2015) 6 Jurisprudence 207Google Scholar

Dickson, J (2015b) ‘Who’s Afraid of Transnational Legal Theory? Dangers and Desiderata’ (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dinan, J (2001) ‘Rights and the Political Process: Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Aftermath of Washington v Glucksberg’ (2001) 31 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 1Google Scholar

Dittert, A (2021) ‘The Politics of Lies: Boris Johnson and the Erosion of the Rule of Law’ The New Statesman (15 July 2021). Available at: www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/07/politics-lies-boris-johnson-and-erosion-rule-law.Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2007) ‘Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 391Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2009a) ‘A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?’ (2009) 37 Federal Law Review 335Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2009b) ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference’ (2009) 47 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 235Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2012) ‘Weak-Form Judicial Review and American Exceptionalism’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 487Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2017) ‘The Core Case for Weak-Form Judicial Review’ (2017) 38 Cardozo Law Review 2193Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2019a) ‘Constitutional “Dialogue” and Deference’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2019b) ‘The Forms, Functions, and Varieties of Weak(ened) Judicial Review’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 904Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2020) ‘Calibrated Proportionality’ (2020) 48 Federal Law Review 92Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2021) ‘Strong Courts: Judicial Statecraft in Aid of Constitutional Change’ (2021) 59 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 298Google Scholar

Dixon, R (2023) Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dixon, R & Issacharoff, S (2016) ‘Living to Fight another Day: Judicial Deferral in Defense of Democracy’ [2016] Wisconsin Law Review 683Google Scholar

Dixon, R & Stone, A, eds. (2018) The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dodek, A (2010) ‘Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and Legal Ethics: Government Lawyers and Custodians of the Rule of Law’ (2010) 33 Dalhousie Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Dodek, A (2016) ‘The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or Bete Noire of Constitutional Politics?’ (2016) 49 Israel Law Review 45Google Scholar

Donald, A (2015) ‘The Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the UK: Unravelling the Paradox’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, , & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Donald, A (2017) ‘Parliaments as Compliance Partners in the European Convention on Human Rights System’ in Saul, , Follesdal, & Ulfstein, (eds.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Donald, A & Leach, P (2016) Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Döring, H (1995) ‘Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda’ in Doring, (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (University of Mannheim)Google Scholar

Dotan, Y (2014) Lawyering for the Rule of Law: Government Lawyers and the Rise of Judicial Power in Israel (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Draghici, C (2015) ‘The Blanket Ban on Assisted Suicide: Between Moral Paternalism and Utilitarian Justice’ (2015) 3 European Human Rights Law Review 286Google Scholar

Drewry, G (1981) ‘Lawyers in the UK Civil Service’ (1981) 59 Public Administration 15Google Scholar

Duclos, N & Roach, K (1991) ‘Constitutional Remedies as “Constitutional Hints”: A Comment’ (1991) 36 McGill Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Duffy, H (2018) Strategic Human Rights Litigation: Understanding and Maximising Impact (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Duxbury, N (2017) ‘Judicial Disapproval as a Constitutional Technique’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 649Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1977) Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1985) A Matter of Principle (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1986) Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R (1996) Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Dyer, C (2000) ‘Ruling Neutralises “Two Strikes” Law’ The Guardian (10 November 2000)Google Scholar

Dyer, C, White, M & Travis, A (2004) ‘Judges’ Verdict on Terror Laws Provokes Constitutional Crisis’ The Guardian (17 December)Google Scholar

Dyson, J (2018) Justice: Continuity and Change (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1997) ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, (ed.) The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (1998) ‘Reuniting the Brain: The Democratic Basis of Judicial Review’ (1998) 9 Public Law Review 98Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2004a) ‘Intimations of Legality amid the Clash of Arms’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 244Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2004b) ‘The Genealogy of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2004c) ‘The Left and the Question of Law’ (2004) 17 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 7Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2006) The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2007) ‘Deference, Security and Human Rights’ in Goold, & Lazarus, (eds.) Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2009) ‘Are Legislatures Good at Morality? Or Better at It than the Courts?’ (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law 46Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2012) ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’ (2012) 2 Global Constitutionalism 229Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2014) ‘Proportionality and Deference in a Culture of Justification’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D (2015) ‘What is a Democratic Culture of Justification?’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Edwards, J (1984) The Attorney General, Politics, and the Public Interest (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Edwards, R (2002) ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 859Google Scholar

Ekins, R (2012) The Nature of Legislative Intent (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Ekins, R (2019) ‘Constitutional Conversations in Britain (in Europe)’ in Sigalet, , Webber, & Dixon, (eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Ekins, R & Sales, P (2011) ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2011) 127 Law Quarterly Review 217Google Scholar

Elgot, J (2021) ‘Trust in Law is at Risk if Ministers Bypass MPs’ The Guardian (19 February 2021)Google Scholar

Elias, S (2015) ‘Judgery and the Rule of Law’ (2015) 14 Otago Law Review 1Google Scholar

Elias, P (2018) ‘Judicial Power and the Balance of our Constitution: Comment’ (2 February 2018). Available at: http://judicialpowerproject.org.uk/sir-patrick-elias-qc-comment/Google Scholar

Ellickson, R (1991) Order without Law: How Neighbours Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2002) ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 340CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, M (2011) ‘Interpretative Bills of Rights and the Mystery of the Unwritten Constitution’ 2011 New Zealand Law Review 591Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2013) ‘Ombudsmen, Tribunals, Inquiries: Re-fashioning Accountability Beyond the Courts’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015a) ‘Beyond the European Convention: Human Rights and the Common Law’ (2015) 68 Current Legal Problems 85Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015b) ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration: Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification’ in Wilberg, & Elliott, (eds.) The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2015c) ‘Legislative Supremacy in a Multi-Dimensional Constitution’ in Elliott, & Feldman, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Public Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Elliott, M (2020) ‘The Fundamentality of Rights at Common Law’ in Elliott, & Hughes, (eds.) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Elliott, M & Hughes, K, eds. (2020) Common Law Constitutional Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Elliott, M & Thomas, R (2020) Public Law 4th ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Elster, J (2000) Ulysses Unbound (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Elster, J (2010) ‘Unwritten Constitutional Norms’ Unpublished manuscript. Available at: https://perma.cc/YPN8-764GGoogle Scholar

Elster, J (2018) ‘The Resistible Rise of Louis Bonaparte’ in Sunstein, (ed.) Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America (Harper Collins)Google Scholar

Elster, J, Offe, C, & Preuss, U (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Ely, JH (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Ely, JH (1991) ‘Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures’ (1991) 77 Virginia Law Review 833Google Scholar

Endicott, T (1999) ‘The Impossibility of the Rule of Law’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2002) ‘“International Meaning”: Comity in Fundamental Rights Adjudication’ (2002) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 280Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2003) ‘Constitutional Logic’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal 201Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2009) ‘Habeas Corpus and Guantánamo Bay: A View from Abroad’ (2009) 54 American Journal of Jurisprudence (Notre Dame) 1Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2014) ‘Proportionality and Incommensurability’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2015a) ‘Comity Among Authorities’ (2015) 68 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2015b) ‘Was Entick v Carrington a Landmark?’ in Tomkins, & Scott, (eds.) Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2017a) ‘The Stubborn Stain Theory of Executive Power: From Magna Carta to Miller’ The Judicial Power Project at Policy Exchange. Available at: https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-stubborn-stain-theory-of-executive-power/Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2017b) ‘Lord Reed’s Dissent in Gina Miller’s Case and the Principles of Our Constitution’ (2017) 8 United Kingdom Supreme Court Yearbook 259.Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2020a) ‘How Judges Make Law’ in Fisher, , King, & Craig, (eds.) The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2020b) ‘Human Rights and the Executive’ (2020) 11 Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 597Google Scholar

Endicott, T (2021) Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Engle, G (1983) ‘Bills Are Made to Pass as Razors Are Made to Sell: Practical Constraints in the Preparation of Legislation’ (1983) 4 Statute Law Review 7Google Scholar

Epp, C (2008) ‘Implementing the Rights Revolution: Repeat Players and the Interpretation of Diffuse Legal Messages’ (2008) 71 Law & Contemporary Problems 41Google Scholar

Eskridge, W (2000) ‘The Circumstances of Politics and the Application of Statutes’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 558Google Scholar

Eskridge, W & Ferejohn, J (2001) ‘Super-Statutes’ (2015) 50 Duke Law Journal 1215Google Scholar

Eskridge, W & Ferejohn, J (2009) ‘Constitutional Horticulture: Deliberation-Respecting Judicial Review’ (2009) 87 Texas Law Review 1273Google Scholar

Eskridge, W & Frickey, P (1992) ‘Quasi-Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 593Google Scholar

Eskridge, W & Frickey, P (1994) ‘Foreword: Law as Equilibrium’ (1994) 108 Harvard Law Review 26Google Scholar

Estlund, C (2003) Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Etherton, T (2010) ‘Liberty, the Archetype and Diversity: A Philosophy of Judging’ [2010] Public Law 727Google Scholar

Evans, C & Evans, S (2006a) ‘Evaluating the Performance of Legislatures’ 2006 Human Rights Law Review 545Google Scholar

Evans, C & Evans, S (2006b) ‘Legislative Scrutiny Committees and Parliament Conceptions of Human Rights’ [2006] Public Law 785Google Scholar

Evans, C & Evans, S (2011) ‘Messages from the Front Line: Parliamentarians’ Perspectives on Rights Protection’ in Campbell, , Ewing, & Tomkins, (eds.) The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Ewing, K (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 79Google Scholar

Ewing, K (2004) ‘The Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2004] Public Law 829Google Scholar

Ewing, K (2012) ‘Doughty Defenders of the Human Rights Act’ in Kang-Riou, (ed.) Confronting the Human Rights Act 1998: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives (Taylor and Francis)Google Scholar

Ewing, K & Tham, J-C (2008) ‘The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2008] Public Law 668Google Scholar

Fallon, R (1997) ‘Foreword: Implementing the Constitution’ (1997) 111 Harvard Law Review 54Google Scholar

Fallon, R (2001) Implementing the Constitution (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Feldman, D (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and Constitutional Principles’ (1999) 19 Legal Studies 165Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2002a) ‘Book Review of Sceptical Essays on Human Rights edited by Tom Campbell, KD Ewing and Adam Tomkins’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 651Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2002b) ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ [2002] Public Law 323Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2004a) ‘Can and Should Parliament Protect Human Rights?’ (2004) 10 European Public Law 635Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2004b) ‘The Impact of Human Rights on the UK Legislative Process’ (2004) 25 Statute Law Review 91Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2005) ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’ (2005) 64 Cambridge Law Journal 329Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2006) ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Risk: The Role of Politicians and Judges’ [2006] Public Law 364Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2007) ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’ in Fenwick, , Phillipson, & Masterman, (eds.) Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act 1998 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Feldman, D (2009) ‘Remedies for Violations of Convention Rights’ in Feldman, (ed.) English Public Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Feldman, D, ed. (2013) Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Feldman, D, (2014) ‘Sovereignties in Strasbourg’ in Rawlings, , Leyland, & Young, (eds.) Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European and International Perspectives (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Feldman, D, (2015) ‘Democracy, Law, and Human Rights: Politics as Challenge and Opportunity’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Feldman, D, (2021) Submission to the Independent Human Rights Act Review. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040525/ihrar-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fenwick, H (2011) ‘Recalibrating ECHR Rights and the Role of the Human Rights Act Post 9/11: Reasserting International Human Rights Norms in the “War on Terror”’ (2011) 64 Current Legal Problems 153Google Scholar

Fenwick, H (2014) ‘Post 9/11 UK Counter-Terrorism Cases in the European Court of Human Rights: A “Dialogic” Approach to Rights Protection or Appeasement of National Authorities?’ in Davis, & de Londras, (eds.) Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Fenwick, H & Phillipson, G (2011) ‘Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counter-terrorism Law and Beyond’ (2011) 56 McGill Law Journal 864Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J & Kramer, L (2002) ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalising Judicial Restraint’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review 962Google Scholar

Finnemore, M & Sikkink, K (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ (1998) 52 International Organisation 887Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2007) ’Nationality, Alienage and Constitutional Principle’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 417Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2011a) Natural Law and Natural Rights 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2011b) Reason in Action: Collected Essays Volume I (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2015) ‘A British “Convention Right” to Assistance in Suicide?’ (2015) 131 Law Quarterly Review 1Google Scholar

Finnis, J (2016) ‘Judicial Law-Making and the “Living” Instrumentalisation of the ECHR’ in Barber, , Ekins, & Yowell, (eds.) Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Fisher, L (1971) ‘The Efficiency Side of the Separation of Powers’ (1971) 5 Journal of American Studies 113Google Scholar

Fisher, L & Devins, N (1992) Political Dynamics of Constitutional Law (West Publishing)Google Scholar

Flaherty, M (1996) ‘The Most Dangerous Branch’ (1996) 105 Yale Law Journal 1725Google Scholar

Fletcher, J & Howe, P (2001) ‘Public Opinion and Canada’s Courts’ in Howe, & Russell, (eds.) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar

Flinders, M (2002) ‘Shifting the Balance? Parliament, the Executive and the British Constitution’ (2002) 50 Political Studies 23Google Scholar

Flinders, M (2012) Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Flinders, M & Kelso, A (2011) ‘Mind the Gap: Political Analysis, Public Expectations and the Parliamentary Decline Thesis’ (2011) 13 British Journal of Politics and International Relations 249Google Scholar

Foley, B (2008) Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality (Institute of Public Administration)Google Scholar

Foley, M (1989) The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’ and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government (Routledge)Google Scholar

Fombad, C (2016a) ‘An Overview of Separation of Powers under Modern African Constitutions’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fombad, C (2016b) ‘The Role of Emerging Hybrid Institutions of Accountability in the Separation of Powers Scheme in Africa’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fontana, D (2009) ‘Government in Opposition’ (2009) 119 Yale Law Journal 548Google Scholar

Ford, R & Gibb, F (2003) ‘Judges Are Failing to Do Their Jobs, Says Blunkett’ The Times (8 May 2003)Google Scholar

Fordham, M (2020) Judicial Review Handbook, 7th ed. (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Forrest, A (2022) ‘Boris Johnson “Misled Parliament on Partygate”, ex-No 10 Staff Ready to Tell Inquiry’ The Independent (9 August 2022)Google Scholar

Foster-Gilbert, C (2018) ‘Introduction’ in Neuberger, & Riddell, (eds.) The Power of Judges (Haus Publishing)Google Scholar

Fowkes, J (2016a) Building the Constitution: The Practice of Constitutional Interpretation of Post-Apartheid South Africa (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Fowkes, J (2016b) ‘Relationships with Power: Re-imagining Judicial Roles in Africa’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fowkes, J & Fombad, C (2016) ‘Introduction’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fraser, C (2005) ‘Constitutional Dialogues between Courts and Legislatures: Can We Talk?’ (2005) 14 Constitutional Forum 7Google Scholar

Fredman, S (2000) ‘Judging Democracy: The Role of the Judiciary under the HRA 1998’ (2000) 53 Current Legal Problems 99Google Scholar

Fredman, S (2013) ‘Adjudication as Accountability: A Deliberative Approach’ in Bamforth, & Leyland, (eds.) Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Fredman, S (2015) ‘From Dialogue to Deliberation: Human Rights Adjudication and Prisoners’ Rights to Vote’ in Hunt, , Hooper, & Yowell, (eds.) Parliament and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Freeman, E (1872) The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times (Macmillan)Google Scholar

French, R (2019) ‘The Principle of Legality and Legislative Intention’ (2019) 40 Statute Law Review 40Google Scholar

Friedman, B (1992) ‘When Rights Encounter Reality: Enforcing Federal Remedies’ (1992) 65 Southern Californian Law Review 735Google Scholar

Friedman, B (1993) ‘Dialogue and Judicial Review’ (1993) 91 Michigan Law Review 577Google Scholar

Friedman, B (2001) ‘The Counter-Majoritarian Problem and the Pathology of Constitutional Scholarship’ (2001) 95 Northwestern University Law Review 933Google Scholar

Friedman, B (2002) ‘The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five’ (2002) 112 Yale Law Journal 153Google Scholar

Friedman, B (2005) ‘The Politics of Judicial Review’ (2005) 84 Texas Law Review 257Google Scholar

Friendly, HJ (1963) ‘The Gap in Lawmaking – Judges Who Can’t and Legislators Who Won’t’ (1963) 62 Columbia Law Review 787Google Scholar

Fuller, L (1968) Anatomy of the Law (Penguin Books)Google Scholar

Fuller, L (1978) ‘The Form and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353Google Scholar

Fumurescu, A (2013) Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gageler, S (2011) ‘Common Law Statutes and Judicial Legislation: Statutory Interpretation as a Common Law Process’ (2011) 37 Monash University Law Review 1Google Scholar

Gageler, S (2015) ‘Legislative Intention’ (2015) 41 Monash University Law Review 1Google Scholar

Gale, C & James, A (2002) ‘Mandatory Life Sentences and Executive Interference’ (2002) 66 Journal of Criminal Law 417Google Scholar

Gambetta, D, ed. (1988) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2001) ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law 707Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2008) ‘The Myth and the Reality of American Constitutional Exceptionalism’ (2008) 107 Michigan Law Review 391Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2010) ‘Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 167Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2011) ‘How Successful and Distinctive Is the Human Rights Act? An Expatriate Comparatist’s Assessment’ (2011) 74 Modern Law Review 195Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2013a) ‘The Case for the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 2229Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2013b) The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2014) ‘Proportionality and Democratic Constitutionalism’ in Huscroft, , Miller, & Webber, (eds.) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2015) ‘What’s so Weak about Weak-Form Review? A Reply to Aileen Kavanagh’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1040Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2018) ‘What Makes for More or Less Powerful Constitutional Courts?’ (2018) 29 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 1Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2020a) ‘Comparative Political Process Theory’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1429Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S (2020b) ‘The Counter-Playbook: Resisting the Populist Assault on Separation of Powers’ (2020) 59 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1Google Scholar

Gardner, J (2002) ‘Reasons for Teamwork’ (2002) 8 Legal Theory 495Google Scholar

Gardner, J (2010) ‘How to Be a Good Judge’ (2010) 32 London Review of Books 15Google Scholar

Gardner, J (2012) Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Garlicki, L (2008) ‘Cooperation of Courts: The Role of Supranational Jurisdictions in Europe’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 509Google Scholar

Garnier, E (2010) The Law Officers – Speech to the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-to-the-constitutional-and-administrative-law-bar-associationGoogle Scholar

Garnier, E (2017) ‘Parliament Is Sovereign but It Must Still Listen to the Law: The Law Officers Have a Vital Role to Play in Reminding MPs to Respect the Judiciary and the Rule of Law’ The Times (18 May 2017)Google Scholar

Garrett, E (1999) ‘Legal Scholarship in an Age of Legislation’ (1999) 34 Tulsa Law Journal 679Google Scholar

Garrett, E & Vermeule, A (2001) ‘Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress’ (2001) 50 Duke Law Journal 1277Google Scholar

Garton Ash, T (2016) Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World (Atlantic Books)Google Scholar

Gaudreault-Desbiens, J (2014) ‘Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty’ (2014) 23 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 1Google Scholar

Gavison, R (1999) ‘The Role of Courts in Rifted Democracies’ (1999) 33 Israel Law Review 216Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2002) ‘Reconciling Parliamentary Democracy and Human Rights’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 248Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2004) Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2005) ‘11 September 2001, Counter-Terrorism and the Human Rights Act’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society 18Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2006) Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2010) ‘The Human Rights Act: An Academic Sceptic Changes His Mind but Not His Heart’ (2010) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 582Google Scholar

Gearty, C (2016) On Fantasy Island: Britain, Europe, and Human Rights (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gee, G (2008) ‘The Political Constitutionalism of JAG Griffith’ (2008) 28 Legal Studies 20Google Scholar

Gee, G et al. (2015) The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK’s Changing Constitution (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gee, G (2019) ‘The Political Constitution and the Political Right’ (2019) 30 King’s Law Journal 148Google Scholar

Gee, G & Webber, G (2010) ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 273Google Scholar

Gee, G & Webber, G (2013) ‘A Grammar of Public Law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 2137Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2008) ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v Hansen’ (2008) 6 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 59Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2009) ‘On a Road to Nowhere: Implied Declarations of Inconsistency and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ (2009) 40 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 613Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2017a) ‘Book Review: Scott Stephenson: From Dialogue to Disagreement in Comparative Rights Constitutionalism’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1247Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2017b) ‘The Constitutional Role of the Courts under the New Zealand Bill of Rights: Three Narratives from Attorney-General v Taylor’ (2017) 48 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 547Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2018) ‘Moving beyond the Constitutionalism/Democracy Dilemma: “Commonwealth Model” Scholarship and the Fixation on Legislative Compliance’ in Elliott, , Varuhas, & Stark, (eds.) The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Bloomsbury)Google Scholar

Geiringer, C (2019) ‘A New Commonwealth Constitutionalism?’ in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2011) ‘Pluralism, Deference, and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 80Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2014) ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Courts: Giving Shape to the Notion of “Shared Responsibility”’ in Gerards, & Fleurin, (eds.) Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis (Intersentia)Google Scholar

Gerards, J (2017) ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: A Typology’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gerards, J & Brems, E (2017) ‘Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases: Introduction’ in Gerards, & Brems, (eds.) Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gerken, H (2014) ‘The Loyal Opposition’ (2014) 123 Yale Law Journal 1958Google Scholar

Geyh, C (2006) When Courts and Congress Collide (University of Michigan Press)Google Scholar

Gies, L (2015a) Mediating Human Rights: Culture, Media and Human Rights (Routledge)Google Scholar

Gies, L (2015b) ‘Human Rights, the British Press and the Deserving Claimant’ in Ziegler, , Wicks, & Hodson, (eds.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, RB (1992) ‘Speaking in a Judicial Voice’ (1992) 67 New York University Law Review 1185Google Scholar

Ginsburg, RB (2010) ‘The Role of Dissenting Opinions’ (2010) 95 Minnesota Law Review 1Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T & Huq, A (2016) Assessing Constitutional Performance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T & Huq, A (2018) How to Save a Constitutional Democracy (Chicago University Press)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T & Kagan, R (2005) ‘Institutional Approaches to Courts as Political Actors’ in Ginsburg, & Kagan, (eds.) Institutions and Public Law: Comparative Approaches (Peter Lang)Google Scholar

Giordano, C (2022) ‘“Truly Shameless”: Covid Bereaved Families Say Boris Johnson “Took Us All for Mugs” after Lockdown Party Fine’ The Independent (12 April 2022).Google Scholar

Gledhill, K (2015) The Human Rights Acts: The Mechanisms Compared (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Gleeson, M (2009) ‘The Meaning of Legislation: Context, Purpose and Respect for Fundamental Rights’ (2009) 20 Public Law Review 26Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J & Levinson, D (2009) ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar

Goldsmith, P (2001) ‘13th Tom Sargent Memorial Lecture: Politics, Public Interest and Prosecutions – A View by the Attorney General’ London. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20090902161810/http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk/attachments/TOM%20SARGENT.docGoogle Scholar

Goldsworthy, J (1999) The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J (2003a) ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’ (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 483Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J (2003b) ‘Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy’ (2003) 38 Wake Forest Law Review 451Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J (2010) Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality and Legislative Intention’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar

Goold, B & Lazarus, L, eds. (2007) Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Gordon, M (2022) ‘The Prime Minister, the Parties, and the Ministerial Code’ UK Constitutional Law Association blogpost (27 April 2022). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2022/04/27/mike-gordon-the-prime-minister-the-parties-and-the-ministerial-code/Google Scholar

Graber, M (1993) ‘The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary’ (1993) 7 Studies in American Political Development 35Google Scholar

Graber, M (2002) ‘Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship’ (2002) 27 Law and Social Inquiry 309Google Scholar

Graber, M (2004) ‘Resolving Political Questions into Judicial Questions: Tocqueville’s Thesis Revisited’ (2004) 21 Constitutional Commentary 485Google Scholar

Graber, M, Levinson, S & Tushnet, M, eds. (2018a) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Graber, M, Levinson, S & Tushnet, M (2018b) ‘Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Introduction’ in Graber, , Levinson, & Tushnet, (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Graham, J (2022) ‘At Last the Curtain Falls on Boris Johnson: The Pantomime Prime Minister Utterly Lacking in Character’ The Guardian (5 September 2022). Available at: –www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/05/curtain-falls-boris-johnson-pantomime-prime-ministerGoogle Scholar

Green, L (1986) ‘Book Review: Law’s Rule – The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology, by A.C. Hutchinson and P. Monahan (eds)’ (1986) 24 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1023Google Scholar

Green, L (2007) ‘The Duty to Govern’ (2007) 13 Legal Theory 165Google Scholar

Green, L (2012) ‘Introduction’ in Hart, (ed.) The Concept of Law 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Green, L (2014) ‘The Democratic Constitution’, unpublished paper on file with authorGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, D (2011) Laying Down the Law: A Discussion of the People, Processes and Problems That Shape Acts of Parliament (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Greene, J (2018) ‘Trump as a Constitutional Failure’ (2018) 93 Indiana Law Journal 93Google Scholar

Greenhouse, L (1995) ‘Justices Rule That Congress Overstepped Bounds: Scalia and Breyer Trade Quotes from “Mending Wall”’ New York Times (19 April 1995)Google Scholar

Greschner, D (2000) ‘The Supreme Court, Federalism and the Metaphors of Moderation’ (2000) 79 Canadian Bar Review 47Google Scholar

Grierson, J & Taylor, D (2020) ‘Home Office Wrong to Refer to “Activist Lawyers”, Top Official Admits’ The Guardian (27 August 2020). Available at: www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/aug/27/home-office-wrong-to-refer-to-activist-lawyers-top-official-admitsGoogle Scholar

Grieve, D (2012a) ‘Politicians and Judges: Speech Given to BPP Law School’ Counsel Magazine (October 2012)Google Scholar

Grieve, D (2012b) ‘The Role of Human Rights in a Law Officer’s Work: Challenges Facing the HRA and the ECHR’ (2012) 17 Judicial Review 101Google Scholar

Grieve, D (2015) The Role of the Attorney General. Ministers Reflect Archive. Riddell, P, Institute for Government. Available at: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/dominic-grieve/Google Scholar

Griffith, J (1979) ‘The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar

Griffith, J (1985) ‘Foreword’ in Gelfand, , Loughlin, & Young, (eds.) Half a Century of Municipal Decline: 1935–1985 (Routledge)Google Scholar

Griffith, J (1997) ‘Judges and the Constitution’ in Rawlings, (ed.) Law, Society, and Economy: Centenary Essays for the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895–1995 (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar

Griffith, J (2001) ‘The Common Law and the Political Constitution’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 42Google Scholar

Griffith, J, Ryle, M & Wheeler-Booth, M (1989) Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedures (Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Grimm, D (2007) ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57 University of Toronto Law Journal 383Google Scholar

Gross, P (2016) ‘The Judicial Role Today’ Queen Mary University, Law and Society Lecture (23 November 2016). Available at: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/speech-by-gross-lj-the-judicial-rle-today.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gross, P (2018) ‘How Can Judges Strengthen the Rule of Law?’ Speech given in Argentina (October 2018). Available at: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/speech-by-lj-gross-J20-conference-sept18.pdfGoogle Scholar

Groves, M & Meagher, D (2017) ‘The Principle of Legality in Australian and New Zealand Law – Final Observations’ in Meagher, & Groves, (eds.) The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand (The Federation Press)Google Scholar

Gutmann, A & Thompson, D (2014) The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands it and Campaigning Undermines it updated ed. (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Guzman, A (2008) How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gwyn, W (1965) The Meaning of the Separation of Powers (Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Gwyn, W (1989) ‘The Indeterminacy of the Separation of Powers in the Age of the Framers’ (1989) 30 William and Mary Law Review 263Google Scholar

Gyorfi, T (2016) Against the New Constitutionalism (Edward Elgar)Google Scholar

Hailbronner, M (2016) ‘Constitutional Legitimacy and the Separation of Powers: Looking Forward’ in Fombad, (ed.) Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hailbronner, M (2020) ‘Political Process Review: Beyond Distrust’ (2020) 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1458Google Scholar

Hailsham, L (1976) ‘Elective Dictatorship’ 1976 The Listener 496Google Scholar

Halberstam, D (2004) ‘Of Power and Responsibility: The Political Morality of Federal Systems’ (2004) 90 Virginia Law Review 731Google Scholar

Halberstam, D (2009) ‘Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States’ in Dunoff, & Trachtman, (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Hale, B (2012) ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’ (2012) 12 Human Rights Law Review 65Google Scholar

Hale, B (2013) ‘What’s the Point of Human Rights?’ (Warwick Law Lecture 2013, University of Warwick), available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131128.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, A (1788) The Federalist Papers (US Library of Congress), available at: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-textGoogle Scholar

Hampshire, S (2000) Justice Is Conflict (Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Hardman, H (2020) ‘In the Name of Parliamentary Sovereignty: Conflict between the UK Government and the Courts over Judicial Deference in the Case of Prisoner Voting Rights’ (2020) 15 British Politics 226Google Scholar

Harel, A (2014) Why Law Matters (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Harlow, C (2016) ‘The Human Rights Act and “Coordinate Construction”: Towards a “Parliament Square” Axis for Human Rights?’ in Barber, , Ekins, , & Yowell, (eds.) Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (1992) Pressure through Law (Routledge)Google Scholar

Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (2016) ‘“Striking Back” and “Clamping Down”: An Alternative Perspective on Judicial Review’ in Bell, et al. (eds) Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Harlow, C & Rawlings, R (2021) Law and Administration 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Hart, HLA (2012) The Concept of Law 3rd ed. (Clarendon Press)Google Scholar

Harvey, P (2015) ‘Third Party Interventions before the ECtHR: A Rough Guide’ (28 January 2015). Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2015/02/24/third-party-interventions-before-the-ecthr-a-rough-guide/Google Scholar

Hay, C (2007) Why We Hate Politics (Polity)Google Scholar

Hay, C & Richards, D (2000) ‘The Tangled Web of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking within the British Core Executive’ (2000) 78 Public Administration 1Google Scholar

Hayward, A (2019) ‘Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development’ (2019) 82 Modern Law Review 922Google Scholar

Hazarika, A & Hamilton, T (2018) Punch and Judy Politics: An Insiders’ Guide to Prime Minister’s Questions (Biteback Publishing)Google Scholar

Hazell, R (2004) ‘Who Is the Guardian of Legal Values in the Legislative Process: Parliament or the Executive?’ [2004] Public Law 495Google Scholar

Hazell, R (2015) ‘The United Kingdom’ in Galligan, & Brenton, (eds.) Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems: Controversies, Changes and Challenges (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Heard, A (1991) Canadian Constitutional Conventions: The Marriage of Law and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heard, A (2012) ‘Constitutional Conventions: The Heart of the Living Constitution’ (2012) 6 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 319Google Scholar

Heclo, H (1975) ‘OMB and the Presidency – The Problem of “Neutral Competence”’ (1975) 38 The Public Interest 80.Google Scholar

Heclo, H (2000) ‘Campaigning and Governing: A Conspectus’ in Ornstein, & Mann, (eds.) The Permanent Campaign and Its Future (American Enterprise Institute)Google Scholar

Heclo, H (2006) ‘Thinking Institutionally’ in Rhodes, , Binder, & Rockman, (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heclo, H (2008) On Thinking Institutionally (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Heise, M (2000) ‘Preliminary Thoughts on the Virtues of Passive Dialogue’ (2000) 34 Akron Law Review 73Google Scholar

Hennessy, P (1995) The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing the British Constitution (Indigo)Google Scholar

Herz, M (2009) ‘Some Thoughts on Judicial Review and Collaborative Governance’ 2009 Journal of Dispute Resolution 361Google Scholar

Heun, W (2011) The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Heydon, J (2014) ‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ (2014) 130 Law Quarterly Review 392Google Scholar

Hickford, M (2013) ‘The Historical, Political Constitution – Some Reflections on Political Constitutionalism in New Zealand’s History and its Possible Normative Value’ 2013 New Zealand Law Review 585Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2005a) ‘Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2005] Public Law 306Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2005b) ‘In Defence of the Legal Constitution’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 981Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2008) ‘The Courts and Politics after the Human Rights Act: A Comment’ [2008] Public Law 84Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2010) Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing)Google Scholar

Hickman, T (2015) ‘Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model’ [2015] New Zealand Law Review 35Google Scholar

Hiebert, J (2002) Charter Conflicts: What Is Parliament’s Role? (McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar

Hiebert, J (2004a) ‘Is It Too Late to Rehabilitate Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause?’ in Huscroft, & Brodie, (eds.) Constitutionalism in the Charter Era (Lexis-Nexis)Google Scholar

Hiebert, J (2004b) ‘New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?’ (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1963Google Scholar