Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:44:06.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Yulanpen Sūtra: Apocryphal or Authentic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2024

Xiaohuan Zhao
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Although the Yulanpen Sūtra is widely considered to be the primary source for the Mulian myth, the origin of this sūtra has been the subject for much debate and discussion among scholars of Chinese religion since the midtwentieth century. There is no extant such scripture in Indic sources known to us, nor is there any mention in them of Maudgalyāyana's journeys to the Dark Regions to rescue his mother (Bandō 2005; Kapstein 2007). The dearth of direct textual evidence in Indic sources and the centuries-long confusion and controversy surrounding the translation, transmission and cataloguing of the Yulan Sūtra/Yulanpen Sūtra as examined in the previous chapter have cast doubt on the authenticity of this Buddhist scripture. Little wonder that the Yulanpen Sūtra is frequently regarded as a Chinese Buddhist apocryphal scripture as shown in Ikeda (1926: 59–64), Honda (1927), Fujino (1956: 340–345), Iwamoto (1968; 1979: 10–20), Miyakawa (1973: 225), Makita (1976: 47–50, 84), Chen (1983: 1–2), Mair (1989: 17), Irisawa (1990: 152), Zhu (1987: 54–59; 1993: 3–11), Teiser (1986: 48–49; 1988: 46; 1989: 192), Liao (1995: 5–6), Hsiao (1995: 231–296; 1996: 83–98; 2005: 326–333), Yin (2006: 17–19), Yoshikawa (2003: 62), Tsuchiya (2005: 189–191) and Xiong (2014; 2015: 247–289), to name but a few. Most representative of them are perhaps Iwamoto, Zhu and Hsiao.

Major Arguments against the Authenticity of the Text

Iwamoto was one of the first major Japanese scholars to challenge the authenticity of the Yulanpen Sūtra. He (1968, quoted in Zhu 1993: 8; 1979: 9ff.) claims that the sūtra is not a translation from India, let alone a translation by Dharmarakṣa , mainly on the grounds that:

  • (1) The content of the Mulian story is not found elsewhere in sources from ancient India;

  • (2) The ‘divine eye’ (Skr. divyacakṣ́us; Ch. tianyan) is a common expression in Indian Buddhist texts, whereas the ‘eye of the Way’ (daoyan) that occurs in the Yulanpen Sūtra is a typical Chinese indigenous expression;

  • (3) The conception of ‘filial devotion and submission’ (xiaoshun) is peculiar to Chinese lineage culture, as is the conception of ‘six kinds of relatives’ (liuqin) that finds no equivalent in Indian Buddhist texts, where the odd number ‘five’ or ‘seven’ tends to be used to refer to types of relatives;

Type
Chapter
Information
Chindian Myth of Mulian Rescuing His Mother
On Indic Origins of the Yulanpen Sūtra
, pp. 37 - 74
Publisher: Anthem Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×