Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:32:32.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - The Other Sister, Bonobos

The Monkey Convergence Hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Kevin D. Hunt
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access

Summary

The startling contrast between bonobo and chimpanzee societies comes into sharp focus in a story Nahoko Tokuyama tells of the intemperate eagerness of a quartet of young males and the rigid social control several females exercised to restrain them (Angier, 2016). It was in the evening, past the time bonobos normally have settled into their sleeping nests for the night. A female was in estrus her flamboyantly swollen estrous swelling stimulating an unrestrained sexual excitement among four males, including the community’s alpha male. Perhaps these males suspected they were skirting the edges of societal norms as they noisily leapt from branch to branch around the female, displaying erections and disturbing what should have been a time of quiet repose for the group. The males, however, were not interested in repose; the presence of this attractive female was simply too much for them to bear. Their overheated commotion went on and on, seemingly with no end in sight. At last, three high-ranking females had had enough. Exploding from beneath, they attacked the four males, scattering them and then ignominiously banishing three of the four into the night, each yelping in retreat. They surrounded the fourth, the alpha male, seized him, and, ignoring his screams of panic, bit him repeatedly – part of a toe was bitten off completely. As the attack wore on he was at last able to break free from the females and flee into the darkness. He failed to reappear the next day, and the day after that; then his absence extended for an entire week. In fact, he limped back into the group only three weeks later, short both a bit of dignity and a bit of a toe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Chimpanzee
Lessons from our Sister Species
, pp. 499 - 516
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almquist, AJ (1974) Sexual differences in the anterior dentition in African primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 40, 359368.Google Scholar
Andrew, RJ (1976) Use of formants in the grunts of baboons and other nonhuman primatesAnn NY Acad Sci 280, 673693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angier, N (2016) A society leg by strong females. New York Times, 13 September, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Aureli, F, de Waal, FBM (1997) Inhibition of social behavior in chimpanzees under high-density conditions. Am J Primatol 41, 213228.Google Scholar
Badrian, A, Badrian, N (1984) Social organization of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. In The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (ed. Susman, RL), pp. 325346. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badrian, N, Malenky, R (1984) Feeding ecology of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. In The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (ed. Susman, RL), pp. 275299. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Badrian, N, Badrian, A, Susman, RL (1981) Preliminary observations on the feeding behavior of Pan paniscus in the Lomako forest of central Zaire. Primates 22, 173181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermejo, M, Omedes, A (1999) Preliminary vocal repertoire and vocal communication of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Lilungu (Democratic Republic of Congo) Folia Primatologica 70, 328357.Google Scholar
Boehm, C (2009Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, CA, White, FJ, Wrangham, RW (1994) Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos. In Chimpanzee Cultures (eds. Wrangham, RW, McGrew, WC, de Waal, FBM, Heltne, PG), pp. 4157. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, Z, Zuberbühler, K (2012) Communication during sex among female bonobos: effects of dominance, solicitation and audience. Scientific Reports 2, 291.Google Scholar
Conklin-Brittain, NL, Knott, CD, Wrangham, RW (2001) The feeding ecology of apes. In Conference Proceedings: The Apes – Challenges for the 21st Century, pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
Coolidge, HJ (1933) Pan paniscus: pygmy chimpanzee from south of the Congo River. Am J Phys Anthropol 18, 157.Google Scholar
Cramer, DL (1977) Craniofacial morphology of Pan paniscus: a morphometric and evolutionary appraisal. Contributions Primatol 10, 164.Google ScholarPubMed
Crompton, L (2003) Homosexuality and Civilization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, KA, De Groot, E, Stevens, JMG (2015) Bonobos show limited social tolerance in a group setting: a comparison with chimpanzees and a test of the relational model. Folia Primatol 86, 164177.Google Scholar
Dahl, JF (1985) The external genitalia of female pygmy chimpanzees. Anat Rec 211, 2428.Google Scholar
de Waal, FBM (1988) The communicative repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus), compared to that of chimpanzees. Behaviour 106, 183251.Google Scholar
de Waal, FBM, Lanting, F (1997) Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Doran, DM, Hunt, KD (1994) The comparative locomotor behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: species and habitat differences. In Chimpanzee Cultures (eds. Wrangham, RW, McGrew, WC, de Waal, FBM, Heltne, PG), pp. 93108. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, PH (2014) Female sociality during the daytime birth of a wild bonobo at Luikotale, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Primates 55, 533542.Google Scholar
Dover, KJ (1978) Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
El Khoury, M, Braga, J, Dumoncel, J, et al. (2014) The human semicircular canals orientation is more similar to the bonobos than to the chimpanzees. PLoS ONE 9, e93824.Google Scholar
Eriksson, J, Siedel, H, Lukas, D, et al. (2006) Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Molec Ecol 15, 939949.Google Scholar
Fenart, R, Deblock, R (1974) Sexual differences in adult skulls in Pan troglodytes. J Hum Evol 3, 123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossey, D (1972) Vocalizations of the mountain gorilla (Gorilla gorilla beringei). Anim Behav 20, 3653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuichi, T (1992) The prolonged estrus of females and factors influencing mating in a wild group of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Zaire. In Topics in Primatology (eds. Matano, S, Tuttle, RH, Ishida, H, Goodman, M), pp. 179190. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T (1997) Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Int J Primatol 18, 855875.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T (2009) Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study. Primates 50, 197209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furuichi, T (2011) Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evol Anthropol 20, 131142.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T, Sanz, C, Koops, K, et al. (2015) Why do wild bonobos not use tools like chimpanzees do? Behaviour 152, 425460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerloff, U, Hartung, B, Fruth, B, et al. (1999) Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples. Proc Roy Soc B 266, 11891195.Google Scholar
Hanson, VD (2009) The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hare, B, Brown, M, Williamson, C, Tomasello, M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 16341636.Google Scholar
Hare, B, Melis, AP, Woods, V, Hastings, S, Wrangham, RW (2007) Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Curr Biol 17, 619623.Google Scholar
Hare, B, Wobber, V, Wrangham, RW (2012) The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Anim Behav 83, 573585.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, C, Furuichi, T (2001) Intergroup transfer and inbreeding avoidance in bonobos. Primate Res 17, 259269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann, G, Fruth, B (2002) Dynamics in social organization of bonobos (Pan paniscus). In Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzee (eds. Boesch, C, Marchant, L, Hohmann, G), pp. 138150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hohmann, G, Fruth, B (2003) Intra- and inter-sexual aggression by bonobos in the context of mating. Behaviour 140, 13891413.Google Scholar
Hohmann, G, Fruth, B (2008) New records on prey capture and meat eating by Bonobos at Lui Kotale, Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. Folia Primatol 79, 103110.Google Scholar
Hunt, KD (1989) Positional behavior in Pan troglodytes at the Mahale Mountains and Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hunt, KD (1992) Positional behavior of Pan troglodytes in the Mahale Mountains and Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. Am J Phys Anthropol 87, 83107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, KD (2016) Why are there apes? Evidence for the co‐evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology. J Anat 228, 630685.Google Scholar
Idani, G (1990) Relations between unit-groups of bonobos at Wamba, Zaire: encounters and temporary fusions. Afr Stud Monogr 11, 153186.Google Scholar
Idani, G (1991) Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatol 57, 8395.Google Scholar
Ingmanson, EJ (1996) Tool-using behavior in wild Pan paniscus social and ecological considerations. In Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes (eds. Russon, AE, Bard, KA, Parker, ST), pp. 190210. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ishizuka, S, Kawamoto, Y, Sakamaki, T, et al. (2018) Paternity and kin structure among neighbouring groups in wild bonobos at Wamba. Roy Soc Open Sci 5, 171006.Google Scholar
Johanson, DC (1974) Some metric aspects of the permanent and deciduous dentition of the pygmy chimpanzee (Pan paniscus). Am J Phys Anthropol 1(41), 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungers, WL, Susman, RL (1984) Body size and skeletal allometry in African apes. In The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (ed. Susman, RL), pp. 131177. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurmain, R (1997) Skeletal evidence of trauma in African apes, with special reference to the Gombe chimpanzees. Primates 38, 114.Google Scholar
Kano, T (1989) The sexual behavior of pygmy chimpanzees. In Understanding Chimpanzees (eds. Heltne, P, Marquardt, L), pp. 176183. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kano, T (1992) The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Legrain, L, Stevens, J, Iscoa, JA, Destrebecqz, A (2011) A case study of conflict management in bonobos: how does a bonobo (Pan paniscus) mother manage conflicts between her sons and her female coalition partner? Folia Primatologica 82, 236243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malenky, RK, Stiles, EW (1991) Distribution of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation and its consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. Am J Primatol 23, 153169.Google Scholar
Malenky, RK, Wrangham, RW (1994) A quantitative comparison of terrestrial herbaceous food consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaïre, and Pan troglodytes in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Am J Primatol 32, 112.Google Scholar
Malenky, RK, Kuroda, S, Vineberg, EO, Wrangham, RW (1994) The significance of terrestrial herbaceous foods for bonobos, chimpanzees and gorillas. In Chimpanzee Cultures (eds. Wrangham, RW, McGrew, WC, de Waal, FB, Heltne, PG), pp. 5975. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marvan, R, Stevens, JMG, Roeder, AD, et al. (2006) Male dominance rank, mating and reproductive success in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Folia Primatol 77, 364376.Google Scholar
McGrew, WC, Marchant, LF, Beuerlein, MM, et al. (2007) Prospects for bonobo insectivory: Lui Kotale, democratic republic of Congo. Int J Primatol 28, 12371252.Google Scholar
McHenry, HM, Corruccini, RS (1981) Pan paniscus and human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 54, 355367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, JC, Nishida, T (1993) Contexts and social correlates of long-distance calling by male chimpanzees. Anim Behav 45, 735746.Google Scholar
Morbeck, ME, Zihlman, AL (1989) Body size and proportions in chimpanzees, with special reference to Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii from Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Primates 30, 369382.Google Scholar
Nissen, HW (1931) A field study of the chimpanzee: observations of chimpanzee behavior and environment in western French Guinea. Comp Psychol Monogr 8, 1122.Google Scholar
Oelze, VM, Fuller, BT, Richards, MP, et al. (2011) Exploring the contribution and significance of animal protein in the diet of bonobos by stable isotope ratio analysis of hair. PNAS 108, 97929797.Google Scholar
Owren, MJ, Seyfarth, RM, Cheney, DL (1997) The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functionsJ Acoust Soc Am 101, 29512963.Google Scholar
Palagi, E (2006) Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. Am J Phys Anthropol 129, 418426.Google Scholar
Paoli, T, Palagi, E, Tacconi, G, Tarli, SB (2006) Perineal swelling, intermenstrual cycle, and female sexual behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Am J Primatol 68, 333347.Google Scholar
Parish, AR (1994) Sex and food control in the uncommon chimpanzee: how bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethol Sociobiol 15, 157179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parish, AR (1996) Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus): evidence for bonding, cooperation, and female dominance in a male-philopatric species. Hum Nat 7, 6196.Google Scholar
Parish, AR, de Waal, FBM (2000) The other “closest living relative:” how bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. Ann NY Acad Sci 907, 97113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pusey, AE, Oehlert, GW, Williams, JM, Goodall, J (2005) Influence of ecological and social factors on body mass of wild chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 26, 331.Google Scholar
Ramos, GL III (2014) Positional behavior in Pan paniscus at Lui Kotale, Democratic Republic of Congo. PhD dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Reichert, KE, Heistermann, M, Keith Hodges, J, Boesch, C, Hohmann, G (2002) What females tell males about their reproductive status: are morphological and behavioural cues reliable signals of ovulation in bonobos (Pan paniscus)? Ethology 108, 583600.Google Scholar
Rendall, D, Seyfarth, RM, Cheney, DL, Owren, MJ (1999) The meaning and function of grunt variants in baboonsAnim Behav 57, 583592.Google Scholar
Rendall, D, Cheney, DL, Seyfarth, RM (2000) Proximate factors mediating “contact” calls in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) and their infants. J Comp Psych 114, 36.Google Scholar
Rendall, D, Owren, MJ, Weerts, E, Hienz, RD (2004) Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 115, 411421.Google Scholar
Rilling, JK, Scholz, J, Preuss, TM, et al. (2012) Differences between chimpanzees and bonobos in neural systems supporting social cognition. Social Cogn Affect Neurosci 7, 369379.Google Scholar
Rosati, A, Hare, B (2012) Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit divergent spatial memory development. Dev Sci 15, 840853.Google Scholar
Schaefer, K, Mitteroecker, P, Gunz, P, Bernhard, M, Bookstein, FL (2004) Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids. Ann Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 86, 471478.Google Scholar
Schamberg, I, Cheney, DL, Clay, Z, Hohmann, G, Seyfarth, RM (2016) Call combinations, vocal exchanges and interparty movement in wild bonobos. Anim Behav 122, 109116.Google Scholar
Schubert, G, Stoneking, CJ, Arandjelovic, M, et al. (2011) Male-mediated gene flow in patrilocal primates. PLoS ONE 6, e21514.Google Scholar
Schubert, G, Vigilant, L, Boesch, C, et al. (2013) Co-residence between males and their mothers and grandmothers is more frequent in bonobos than chimpanzeesPLoS One 8, e83870.Google Scholar
Serckx, A, Huynen, MC, Bastin, JF, et al. (2014) Nest grouping patterns of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in relation to fruit availability in a forest–savannah mosaic. PloS ONE 9, e93742.Google Scholar
Shea, BT (1984) An allometric perspective on the morphological and evolutionary relationships between pygmy (Pan paniscus) and common (Pan troglodytes) chimpanzees. In The Pygmy Chimpanzee (ed. Susman, RL), pp. 89130. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Smith, RJ, Jungers, WL (1997) Body mass in comparative primatology. J Hum Evol, 32, 523559.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M, Hohmann, G (2013) Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67, 17671780.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M, Fowler, A, Deimel, C, Hohmann, G (2009) Evidence for the consumption of arboreal, diurnal primates by bonobos (Pan paniscus). Am J Primatol 71, 171174.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M, Mundry, R, Hohmann, G (2011) Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 278, 590598.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M, Girard-Buttoz, C, Boesch, C, et al. (2017) Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation. Roy Soc Open Sci 4, 161081.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M, Boesch, C, Crockford, C, et al. (2019) Males with a mother living in their group have higher paternity success in bonobos but not chimpanzees. Curr Biol 29, R354R355.Google Scholar
Susman, RL (1979) Comparative and functional morphology of hominoid fingers. Am J Phys Anthropol 50, 215236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokuyama, N, Furuichi, T (2016) Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Anim Behav 119, 2735.Google Scholar
Toth, N, Schick, KD, Savage-Rumbaugh, ES, Sevcik, RA, Rumbaugh, DM (1993) Pan the tool-maker: investigations into the stone tool-making capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus). J Arch Sci 20, 8191.Google Scholar
Trut, L, Oskina, I, Kharlamova, A (2009) Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model. Bioessays 31, 349360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vervaecke, H, Van Elsacker, L (1992) Hybrids between common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) in captivity. Mammalia 56, 667669.Google Scholar
Videan, EN, McGrew, WC (2001) Are bonobos (Pan paniscus) really more bipedal than chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)? Am J Primatol 54, 233239.Google Scholar
White, FJ (1988) Party composition and dynamics in Pan paniscus. Int J Primatol 9, 179193.Google Scholar
White, FJ (1989) Ecological correlates of pygmy chimpanzee social structure. In Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals (eds. Standen, V, Foley, RA), pp. 151164. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
White, FJ (1996) Pan paniscus 1973–1996: twenty-three years of field research. Evol Anthropol 5, 1117.Google Scholar
White, FJ (1998) Seasonality and socioecology: the importance of variation in fruit abundance to bonobo sociality. Int J Primatol 19, 10131027.Google Scholar
White, FJ, Wood, KD (2007) Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance. Am J Primatol 69, 837850.Google Scholar
White, FJ, Wrangham, RW (1988) Feeding competition and patch size in the chimpanzee species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour 105, 148164.Google Scholar
White, FJ, Waller, M, Boose, K, Merrill, MY, Wood, KD (2015) Function of loud calls in wild bonobos. J Anthropol Sci 93, 113.Google Scholar
Wilkins, AS, Wrangham, RW, Fitch, WT (2014) The “Domestication Syndrome” in mammals: a unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. Genetics 197, 795808.Google Scholar
Wilson, ML, Boesch, C, Fruth, B, et al. (2014) Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts. Nature 513, 414417.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1977) Feeding behaviors of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In Primate Ecology (ed. Clutton-Brock, TH), pp. 503538. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1979) The evolution of ape social systems. Soc Sci Infor 18, 335368.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1980) An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75, 262300.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1986) Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzees. In Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution (eds. Rubenstein, DI, Wrangham, RW), pp. 352378. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1993) The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Hum Nat 4, 4779.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (1999) Evolution of coalitionary killing. Am J Phys Anthropol 110(S29), 130.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW (2000) Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In Male Primates (ed. Kappeler, P), pp. 248258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW, Pilbeam, DR (2001) African apes as time machines. In All Apes Great and Small, Vol 1: African Apes (eds Galdikas, BMF, Briggs, NE, Sheeran, LK, Shapiro, GL, Goodall, J), pp. 517. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW, Smuts, BB (1980) Sex differences in the behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. J Reprod Fert (Suppl) 28, 1331.Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW, Wilson, ML, Muller, MN (2006) Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans. Primates 47, 1426.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, S (2015) Non-reciprocal but peaceful fruit sharing in wild bonobos in Wamba. Behaviour 152, 335357.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×