Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-67wsf Total loading time: 1.259 Render date: 2022-05-16T19:57:44.678Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

1.3 - Introduction: Languages

from I. - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Paul Heggarty
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Colin Renfrew
University of Cambridge
Colin Renfrew
University of Cambridge
Get access


How Language Can Inform Prehistory

From the Tower of Babel to the tales of the Aboriginal Dreamtime, we have long sought to account for our baffling diversity of tongues. Today, however, prehistorians can look to our linguistic diversity not just as an enigma to be resolved, but as in fact a rich source of data on our origins. Or at least potentially so, for it remains a challenge to work out quite how we are to interpret the linguistic record of our past.

The science of linguistics first began out of this desire to make sense of our linguistic diversity, and has taken great strides over the last two centuries. Even so, the nature of language, and how it changes through time, still frustrate us. It does not even allow, for instance, a straightforward answer to what may seem the simplest question: exactly how many different languages does humanity speak? Typical estimates range around six to seven thousand spoken today, usually with reference to the Ethnologue classification (Lewis 2013), but in truth such figures mask considerable inconsistency and imprecision. The very question is in fact somewhat simplistic, akin to asking an archaeologist to count how many human “cultures” there are, or a geneticist how many “populations”. The definition of a discrete language, as opposed to a dialect, or language family, is as a matter of principle by no means always clear-cut. Across much of the globe, counting languages relies on arbitrary lines drawn through what in reality are “dialect continua”: across much of China, India, the native Americas, Arabic- and Bantu-speaking countries, even Scandinavia. But by whatever measure, our linguistic diversity is vanishing at an alarming rate. Almost every week, one of our varieties of human language goes extinct.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Adelaar, W. F. H. 1989. Review of Greenberg (1987): language in the Americas. Lingua 78: 249–55.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1978. Vox Latina. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Anthony, D. W. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Anttila, R. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics, second revised edition. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Balaresque, P., Bowden, G. R., Adams, S. M., Leung, H.-Y., King, T. E., Rosser, Z. H., Goodwin, J., Moisan, J.-P., Richard, C., Millward, A., Demaine, A. G., Barbujani, G., Previderè, C., Wilson, I. J., Tyler-Smith, C. & Jobling, M. A. 2010. A predominantly Neolithic origin for European paternal lineages. PLoS Biology 8 (1): p. e1000285.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Bellwood, P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Blackwell: Oxford.
Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds. 2002. Examining the Forming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray, R. D., Suchard, M. A. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337 (6097): 957–60.Google Scholar
Browman, D. L. 1994. Titicaca Basin archaeolinguistics: Uru, Pukina and Aymara ad 750–1450. World Archaeology 26 (2): 235–51.Google Scholar
Bryant, E. 2003. The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Campbell, L. & Poser, W. J. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Coleman, R. 1988. Review of Renfrew (1987): Archaeology and Language. Current Anthropology 29 (3): 449–53.Google Scholar
Deutscher, G. 2010. Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. Henry Holt: New York.
Diamond, J. M. 1991. The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee. Hutchinson Radius: London.
Diamond, J. M. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Allen Lane: London.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Dolgopolsky, A. 2008. Nostratic Dictionary. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge. Available at .
Ehret, C. 2002. The Civilizations of Africa: A History to 1800. James Currey: Oxford.
Fortescue, M. 1997. Dialect distribution and small group interaction in Greenlandic Eskimo, pp. 111–22 in (McConvell, P. & Evans, N., eds.) Archaeology and Linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in Global Perspective. Oxford University Press: Melbourne.
Gamkrelidze, T. V. & Ivanov, V. V. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426 (6965): 435–9.Google Scholar
Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J. & Greenhill, S. J. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323 (5913): 479.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
Haak, W., Balanovsky, O., Sanchez, J. J., Koshel, S., Zaporozhchenko, V., Adler, C. J., Der Sarkissian, C. S. I., Brandt, G., Schwarz, C., Nicklisch, N., Dresely, V., Fritsch, B., Balanovska, E., Villems, R., Meller, H., Alt, K. W., Cooper, A. & the Genographic Consortium. 2010. Ancient DNA from European Early Neolithic farmers reveals their Near Eastern affinities. PLoS Biology 8 (11): p. e1000536.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds.) 2008. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Max Planck Digital Library: Munich. Available at .
Heggarty, P. 2006. Interdisciplinary indiscipline? Can phylogenetic methods meaningfully be applied to language data – and to dating language? pp. 183–94 in (Forster, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Heggarty, P. 2008. Linguistics for archaeologists: a case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. 2010. Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of “word list” comparisons. Diachronica 27 (2): 301–24.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. 2010. Agriculture and language dispersals: limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51 (2): 163–91.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. 2013a. Farming-language dispersals: principles, in (C. Smith, ed.) Springer Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer.
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. 2013b. Farming-language dispersals: a worldwide survey, in (C. Smith, ed.) Springer Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer.
Heggarty, P., Maguire, W. & McMahon, A. 2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (365): 3829–43.Google Scholar
Henrickson, E. F. & Thuesen, I. (eds.) 1989. Upon This Foundation: The ‘Ubaid Reconsidered. Museum Tusculanum Press: Copenhagen.
Huxley, T. H. 1865. On the methods and results of ethnology. Fortnightly Review 1: 257–77.Google Scholar
Kitchen, A., Ehret, C., Assefa, S. & Mulligan, C. J. 2009. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2703–10.Google Scholar
Krell, K. S. 1998. Gimbutas’ Kurgan-PIE homeland hypothesis: a linguistic critique, pp. 267–82 in (Blench, R. & Spriggs, M., eds.) Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses. Routledge: London.
Lewis, M. P. Simons, G.F. & Fonniy, C.D. eds. 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World 17th ed. SIL International: Dallas. Available at .
Mallory, J. P. 2013. Twenty-first century clouds over Indo-European homelands. Journal of Language Relationship 9: 145–54Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. 1990. On megalocomparison. Language 66 (1): 106–20.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. M. S., Heggarty, P., McMahon, R. & Slaska, N. 2005. Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: an Andean case study. Transactions of the Philological Society 103 (2): 147–70.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. 1999a. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Nettle, D. 1999b. Linguistic diversity of the Americas can be reconciled with a recent colonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96: 3325–9.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1990. Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the New World. Language 66: 475–521.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Nichols, J. 1995. Diachronically stable structural features, pp. 337–55 in (Andersen, H., ed.) Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Nichols, J. 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 359–84.Google Scholar
Pagel, M. 2009. Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nature Reviews Genetics 10 (6): 405–15.Google Scholar
Pearce, A. 2011. Reindigenisation and native languages in Peru’s “long nineteenth century” (1795–1940), pp. 135–63 in (Heggarty, P. & Pearce, A., eds.) History and Language in the Andes. Palgrave Macmillan: London.
Pulgram, E. 1958. The Tongues of Italy. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo- European Origins. Jonathan Cape: London.
Ringe, D. A. 2000. Some relevant facts about historical linguistics, pp. 139–62 in (Renfrew, C., ed.) America Past, America Present: Genes and Languages in the Americas and Beyond. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Ringe, D. A., Warnow, T. & Taylor, A. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100 (1): 59–129.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. W. 1992. Old English and Its Closest Relatives. Routledge: London.
Ruhlen, M. 2000. Some unanswered linguistic questions, pp. 163–75 in (Renfrew, C., ed.) America Past, America Present: Genes and Languages in the Americas and Beyond. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Sapir, E. 1916. Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A Study in Method. Government Printing Bureau: Ottawa. Available at .
Sherratt, A. & Sherratt, S. 1988. The archaeology of Indo-European: an alternative view. Antiquity 62 (236): 584–95.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, P. 1998. Genetics, linguistics, and prehistory: thinking big and thinking straight. Antiquity 277: 505–27.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1952. Lexico-statistical dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: with special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96: 452–63.Google Scholar
Tadmor, U., Haspelmath, M. & Taylor, B. 2010. Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica 27 (2): 226–46.Google Scholar
Torero, A. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e Historia. Editorial Horizonte: Lima; and Institut Français des Études Andines: Lima.
Trask, L. 1999. Why should a language have any relatives? pp. 157–78 in (Renfrew, C. & Nettle, D., eds.) Nostratic: Examining a Linguistic Macrofamily. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.
Trask, R. L. 2000. Dictionary of Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Routledge: London.
Urton, G. 2003. Signs of the Inka Khipu: binary coding in the Andean knotted-string records. University of Texas Press: Austin.
Vavilov, N. I. 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany and Plant-Breeding (Leningrad) 16 (2): 1–248.Google Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats