Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Section I Information problems
- Section II End of life care
- Section III Pregnant women and children
- Section IV Genetics and biotechnology
- Section V Research ethics
- Section VI Health systems and institutions
- Section VII Using clinical ethics to make an impact in healthcare
- Section VIII Global health ethics
- Section IX Religious and cultural perspectives in bioethics
- Section X Specialty bioethics
- Introduction
- 56 Surgical ethics
- 57 Anesthesiology ethics
- 58 Critical and intensive care ethics
- 59 Emergency and trauma medicine ethics
- 60 Primary care ethics
- 61 Infectious diseases ethics
- 62 Psychiatric ethics
- 63 Neuroethics
- 64 Pharmacy ethics
- 65 Alternative and complementary care ethics
- Index
- References
65 - Alternative and complementary care ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Section I Information problems
- Section II End of life care
- Section III Pregnant women and children
- Section IV Genetics and biotechnology
- Section V Research ethics
- Section VI Health systems and institutions
- Section VII Using clinical ethics to make an impact in healthcare
- Section VIII Global health ethics
- Section IX Religious and cultural perspectives in bioethics
- Section X Specialty bioethics
- Introduction
- 56 Surgical ethics
- 57 Anesthesiology ethics
- 58 Critical and intensive care ethics
- 59 Emergency and trauma medicine ethics
- 60 Primary care ethics
- 61 Infectious diseases ethics
- 62 Psychiatric ethics
- 63 Neuroethics
- 64 Pharmacy ethics
- 65 Alternative and complementary care ethics
- Index
- References
Summary
Ms. M, a patient with a rare skin condition who has failed all relevant conventional therapies, asks her dermatologist, Dr. N, about treatment options involving complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies. Dr. N mentions a homeopathic remedy commonly available in pharmacies and health food stores; Ms. M tries the remedy, and the skin condition quickly resolves. She is elated by this success and tells her best friend, a neurologist, who promptly files a complaint with the state medical board, noting that few, if any, physicians of any subspecialty in the state ever recommend homeopathy for any condition. The board holds a hearing at which there is no evidence that Dr. N has ever harmed a patient or acted unskillfully or incompetently in any way. Indeed, several dozen patients testify that Dr. N is a skilled, caring healthcare professional. The board nonetheless decides to revoke Dr. N's license based on a state statute defining professional misconduct as “any departure from acceptable and prevailing medical standards.” Subsequently, Ms. M sues Dr. N for malpractice, alleging that he failed to adequately discuss the risks and benefits of a different CAM therapy – acupuncture – for her condition, and, in the alternative, that by inducing her to rely on homeopathy he neglected conventional dermatological treatment.
What are complementary and alternative medical therapies?
Complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies refer to those modalities and whole systems of healing that historically have not been part of the dominant system of medical practice in the West.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics , pp. 513 - 520Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, , , and (2002). Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings. Ann Intern Med 137: 660–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006). House of Delegates, Resolution 3-06 (A-06). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
(2002). Regulation of complementary/alternative medicine: a Canadian perspective. Complement Ther Med 10: 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Regulation of natural health products in Canada. Clin Res Regul Aff 20: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle v. Revici (1992). 961 F.2d 1060 (2d Cir).
(2004). Annual Representatives Meeting Policies: Complementary Medicine Policy. London: British Medical Association.Google Scholar
Charell v. Gonzales (1997). 660 New York Supplement 2d 665, 668 (S.Ct., N.Y. County, 1997), affirmed and modified to vacate punitive damages award, 673 New York Supplement 2d 685 (App Div., 1st Dept., 1998), reargument denied, appeal denied, 1998 New York Appellate Division LEXIS 10711 (App. Div., 1st Dept., 1998), appeal denied, 706 Northeastern Reporter 2d 1211 (1998).
(1998). Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Legal Boundaries and Regulatory Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Beyond Complementary Medicine: Legal and Ethical Perspectives on HealthCare and Human Evolution. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Future Medicine: Ethical Dilemmas, Regulatory Challenges, and Therapeutic Pathways to Health and Healing in Human Transformation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2004a). Healing at the borderland of medicine and religion: regulating potential abuse of authority by spiritual healers. J Law Relig 18: 373–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b). Legal and ethical issues in complementary medicine: a US perspective. Med J Aust 181: 168–9.Google Scholar
(2006). Legal and ethical issues relating to use of complementary therapies in pediatric hematology/oncology. J Ped Hematol Oncol. 28: 190–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Potential physician malpractice liability associated with complementary/integrative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med 136: 596–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). Complementary therapies in pediatrics: a legal perspective. Pediatrics 115: 774–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004). Integrating complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings: legal quandaries and potential policy models. Cinn Law Rev 72: 671–729.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2005a). Emerging credentialing practices, malpractice liability policies, and guidelines governing complementary and alternative medical practices and dietary supplements recommendations: a descriptive study of 19 integrative healthcare centers in the US. Arch Int Med 165: 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2005b). Policies Pertaining to complementary and alternative medical therapies in a random sample of 39 academic health centers. Alt Ther Health Med 11: 36–40.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2002). Credentialing complementary and alternative medical providers. Ann Intern Med 137: 965–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2001). Informed consent in complementary and alternative medicine. Arch Intern Med 161: 2288–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002). Model Guidelines for Physician Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Medical Practice. Washington, DC: Federation of State Medical Boards.Google Scholar
(2005). Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
, , , (2004). Cochrane Reviews of Complementary and Alternative Therapies: Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence. Ottawa: Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
(2005). Evaluation of the National Guidelines for the Use of Complementary Therapies in Supportive and Palliative Care. London: Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health.Google Scholar
(2006). Searching for Evidence: Complementary Therapies Research. London: Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health.Google Scholar
Schneider v. Revici (1987) 817 Federal Reporter 2d 987 (2d Cir.).
Schouten, R. and Cohen, M. H. (2004). Legal issues in integration of complementary therapies into cardiology. In Complementary and Integrative Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease, ed. , , and . Edinburgh: Elsevier, pp. 20–55.Google Scholar
(2005). Development of Proposals for a Future Voluntary Regulatory Structure for Complementary HealthCare Professions: A Report Commissioned by The Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health. London: The Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (1998). Medical malpractice implications of alternative medicine. JAMA 280: 1620–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California (1963) 383 Pacific Reporter 2d 441.
(2002). Sixth Report: Complementary and Alternative Medicine. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by