References

Aarsleff, Hans. From Locke to Saussure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Abel, Jacob F. Einleitung in die Seelenlehre. Stuttgart: Mezler, 1786.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H. Doing Things with Texts. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar

Achaval, Hugo M. de, , S.J., and Holmes, J. Derek (eds.). The Theological Papers of John Henry Newman on Faith and Certainty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.

Acton, Lord. Essays on the Study and Writing of History. Ed. Fears, J.. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Adamson, Robert. A Short History of Logic. 1882. London: W. Blackwood, 1911.Google Scholar

Addison, Joseph. “The Pleasures of the Imagination.” Spectator, nos. 411–21 (Saturday, June 21–Friday, July 4, 1712).Google Scholar

Adickes, Erich. German Kantian Bibliography. Philosophical Review, 1893–6.Google Scholar

Adler, Hans. “Ästhetische und anästhetische Wissenschaft: Kants Herder-Kritik als Dokument moderner Paradigmenkonkurrenz.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 68 (1994): 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Negative Dialectics. Trans. Ashton, E. B.. New York: Seabury Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973; Continuum, 1983.Google Scholar

Agassiz, Louis. The Classification of Insects from Embryological Data. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albury, William R. “Experiment and Explanation in the Physiology of Bichat and Magendie.” Studies in the History of Biology 1 (1977): 47–131.Google ScholarPubMed

Aldridge, A. Owens. “Ancients and Moderns in the Eighteenth Century.” In Dictionary of the History of Ideas, 1:76–87. New York: Scribner, 1968.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey. Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Alison, Archibald. Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute and Archibald Constable, 1811.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry EKant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl.Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef

Allison, Henry EKant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E “On Being Neither Post- nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore Concerning The Fate of Autonomy.” Inquiry 46, no. 2 (2003): 272–92.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E “Pure Reason of Itself Alone Suffices to Determine the Will.” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Ed. Höffe, O., 99–114. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E “Zu Kants Argumentation am Anfang des Dritten Abschnitts der Grundlegung.” In Systematische Ethik mit Kant. Eds. Baumgarten, Hans-Ulrich and Held, Carsten, 24–54. Freiburg: Alber, 2001.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Anderson, Lanier. “Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2005): 287–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson-Gold, Sharon. “Kant’s Ethical Commonwealth: The Highest Good as a Social Goal.” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angerer, Marie-Luise. Begehren nach dem Affekt. Berlin: Diaphanes, 2007.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, Frank. Historical Representation. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, FrankNarrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar

Appel, Toby. The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Appleby, Joyce, et al. Telling the Truth about History. New York: W. W. Norton, 1994.Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret. “The Myth of Cultural Integration.” British Journal of Sociology 36 (1985): 333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1973.Google Scholar

Ariew, André. “Population Thinking.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Ed. Ruse, M., 64–86. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Trans. Buroker, Jill Vance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. The Complete Works of Matthew Arnold. Ed. Super, R. H.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, MatthewThe Works of Matthew Arnold in Fifteen Volumes. London: Macmillan, 1903–4.Google Scholar

Arnold, Thomas. “Mill on Liberty.” Rambler 59, no. 352 (1859).Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought, vol. 1. London: Penguin, 1965.Google Scholar

Ast, Friedrich. Grundriss einer Geschichte der Philosophie. Landshut, 1807.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. F. “Kant’s Philosophy of History.” In Substance and Form in History: A Collection of Essays in Philosophy of History. Eds. Pompa, L. and Dray, W., 15–26. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Ed. Campbell, R.. 5th ed. Edinburgh: John Murray, 1885.Google Scholar

Auxter, Thomas. Kant’s Moral Telelology. Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Avineri, Shlomo. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avineri, ShlomoThe Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baader, Franz von. Sämtliche Werke. Eds. Hoffmann, Franz et al. Leipzig: Bethmann, 16 vols. 1851–60.Google Scholar

Baer, Karl Ernst von. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtungen und Reflexionen. Königsberg: Bornträger, 1828.Google Scholar

Baertschi, Bernard. Les rapports de l’âme et du corps: Descartes, Diderot et Maine de Biran. Paris: Vrin, 1992.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette. “Secular Faith.” In Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Bain, Alexander. The Senses and the Intellect. London: Parker, 1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Gordon P., and Hacker, P. M. S.. Frege: Logical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

Bakunin, Michail. Bakunin on Anarchy. Ed. and trans. Dolgoff, Sam. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1973.Google Scholar

Bakunin, MichailBrief aus dem Gefängnis: Die Beichte. Trans. Kersten, Paul. Berlin: Karin Kramer, 1988.Google Scholar

Bakunin, MichailGesammelte Werke. Berlin: Karin Kramer, 1975.Google Scholar

Bakunin, MichailGod and the State. Ed. Avrich, Paul. New York: Dover, 1970.Google Scholar

Bakunin, MichailStatism and Anarchy. Ed. and trans. Shatz, Marshall S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balan, Bernard. L’ordre et le temps. Paris: Vrin, 1979.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Thomas (ed.). Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef

Banton, Michael. The Idea of Race. London: Tavistock, 1977.Google Scholar

Barsanti, Giulio. “Lamarck and the Birth of Biology: 1740–1810.” In Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790–1840. Eds. Poggi, S. and Bossi, M., 47–74. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.Google Scholar

Barsanti, Giulio “La naissance de la biologie: Observations, théories, métaphysiques en France, 1740–1810.” In Nature, Histoire, Société: Mélanges offerts à J. Roger. Eds. Rey, R., Blanckaert, C., and Fischer, J. L., 196–228. Paris: Klincksieck, 1995.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Discourse of History.” Comparative Criticism 3 (1981): 11–17.Google Scholar

Batteux, Charles. Les beaux arts réduits à un même principe. Paris, 1746.

Batteux, CharlesHerrn abt Batteux: Einschränkung der schönen Künste auf einen einzigen Grundsatz. Trans. Schlegel, Johann Adolf. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1751.Google Scholar

Bauer, Bruno. “‘Einleitung in die Dogmengeschichte’ von Theodor Kliesoth.” In Anekdota zur neuesten deutschen Philosophie und Publicistik. vol. 2. Ed. Ruge, Arnold. Zurich: Verlag des Literarischen Comptoirs, 1843.Google Scholar

Bauer, BrunoThe Jewish Problem (Die Judenfrage). Trans. Lederer, Helen. In The Young Hegelians. Ed. Stepelevich, Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred. “The Beginnings of Schelling’s Philosophy of Nature.” In The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Ed. Sedgwick, Sally. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baumer, Franklin L. Religion and the Rise of Scepticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1960.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1961.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebMeditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Ed. and trans. Heinz Paetzold. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1983.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebMetaphysica. 3rd ed. Halle: Hemmerde, 1757. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1963.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebReflections on Poetry. Trans. Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, W. B.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Bautain, Louis. Philosophie du Christianisme: Correspondance religieuse de L. Bautain, publiée par l’Abbe H. de Bonnechose. 2 vols. Paris: Derivaux; Strasbourg: Fevrier, 1835. Reprint, Frankfurt: Minerva, 1967.Google Scholar

Bautain, LouisPsychologie expérimentale. Strasbourg: Derivaux; Paris: Lagny, 1839.Google Scholar

Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Beattie, James. Elements of Moral Science. London: Routledge, 1793.Google Scholar

Beauvior, Simone de. “Faut-il bruler Sade?” Les Temps Modernes 75 (1952): 197–230.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Beck, Louis White (ed.). Kant on History. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar

Becker, Carl. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst. Frühromantik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C. The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRef

Allison, Henry EEnlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry EThe Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987, 1993.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry EGerman Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry EHegel. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry ESchiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Allison, Henry E (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Beneke, Friedrich Eduard. Kant und die philosophische Aufgabe unserer Zeit. Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler, 1832.Google Scholar

Beneke, Friedrich EduardDie neue Psychologie. Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler, 1845.Google Scholar

Beneke, Friedrich EduardSystem der Logik als Kunstlehre des Denken: Erster Theil. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler, 1842.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Benjamin, WalterGesammelte Schriften. Eds. Tiedemann, Rolf and Schweppenhäuser, Hermann. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar

Benner, Erica. Really Existing Nationalisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. A Comment on the Commentaries. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham, JeremyA Fragment on Government and An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Ed. Harrison, Wilfrid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1948.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy “Nonsense on Stilts, or Pandora’s Box Opened, or the French Declaration of Rights Prefixed to the Constitution of 1791, Laid Open and Exposed.” In Rights, Representation and Reform, Nonsense on Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution. Eds. Schofield, Philip, Pease-Watkins, Catherine, and Blamires, Cyprian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bentham, JeremyThe Works of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Russell & Russell, 1962.Google Scholar

Berger, Fred. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George. The Analyst. 1734. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 62–92. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George “De Motu.” 1721. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 38–54. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Berkeley, GeorgeEssay Towards a New Theory of Vision. Dublin: Pepyat, 1709.Google Scholar

Berkeley, GeorgePhilosophical Commentaries, notebooks A, B. 1707–8. Excerpted in From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 14–16. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Berkeley, GeorgeA Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part One. 1710. Excerpted in From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 21–37. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Roger. The Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. The Magus of the North: J. G. Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism. London: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1993.Google Scholar

Berlin, IsaiahThe Proper Study of Mankind. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1997.Google Scholar

Berlin, IsaiahThree Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Berlin, IsaiahVico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Viking, 1976.Google Scholar

Berman, Antoine. L’épreuve de l’étranger: Culture et traduction dans l’Allemagne romantique: Herder, Goethe, Schlegel, Novalis, Humboldt, Schleiermacher, Hölderlin (Les Essais). Paris: Gallimard, 1984.Google Scholar

Bernal, Martin. Black Athena: the Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. London: Free Association, 1987.Google Scholar

Bernard, Claude. Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: Baillière, 1865.Google Scholar

Bernard, ClaudeLeçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux. Paris: Baillière, 1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, J. M.Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Bertram, Christopher, and Chitty, Andrew (eds.). Has History Ended? Fukuyama, Marx, Modernity. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994.

Bevan, Edwin. Symbolism and Belief. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1938.Google Scholar

Bichat, Xavier. Anatomie générale. 4 vols. Paris: Béchet, 1801.Google Scholar

Bichat, XavierRecherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort. Paris: Béchet, 1800.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. Ruling Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Blackburn, SimonSpreading the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Blanke, Horst Walter, and Fleischer, Dirk (eds.). Theoretiker der deutschen Aufklärungshistorie. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Fromann, 1990.

Blanqui, Auguste. L’éternité par les astres. Paris: Les impressions nouvelles, 2002.Google Scholar

Blanqui, AugusteŒuvres complètes, vol. 1, Écrits sur la révolution. Ed. Münster, Arno. Paris: Éditions galilée, 1977.Google Scholar

Blanqui, AugusteTextes choisis. Ed. Volguine, Vjaceslav Petrovic. Paris: Éditions sociales, 1955.Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Bober, M. M. Karl Marx’s Interpretation of History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Bodammer, Theodor. Hegels Deutung der Sprache. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969.Google Scholar

Bödeker, Hans Erich, Iggers, Georg, Knudsen, Jonathan, and Reill, Peter (eds.). Aufklärung und Geschichte: Studien zur deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.

Bodmer, Johann Jakob. Critische Abhandlung von dem Wunderbaren in der Poesie. Zurich, 1740.Google Scholar

Boeckh, August Wilhelm. Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften. Ed. Bratuscheck, E.. Leipzig: Teubner, 1877. Eds. Bratuscheck, Ernst and Klussmann, Rudolf. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1886; Darmstadt, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckh, August WilhelmOn Interpretation and Criticism. Ed. and trans. Pritchard, John Paul. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Bois-Reymond, Emil du. “Untersuchungen über thierische Elektrizität.” In Vorträge über Philosophie und Gesellschaft. Ed. Wollgast, Siegfried. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1974.Google Scholar

Bolzano, Bernard. “Contributions to a Better-Grounded Presentation of Mathematics.” 1810. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 176–224. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bolzano, Bernard. “Purely Analytic Proof….” 1817. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 227–48. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bolzano, Bernard. Wissenschaftslehre. 1837. Ed. Jan Berg. In Bernard-Bolzano-Gesamtausgabe, ser. 1, vols. 11–14. Eds. Winter, Eduard, Berg, Jan, Kambartel, Friedrich, Louzil, Jaromír, and Rootselaar, Bob van. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1985–2000. Abridged trans. Rolf George as Theory of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Bonald, Louis de. La Législation primitive considérée dans les derniers temps par les seules lumières de la raison. 2 vols. Paris: Le Clere, 1802.Google Scholar

Bonald, Louis deRecherches philosophiques sur les premiers objects des connaissances morales. Paris: Le Clere, 1818.Google Scholar

Bonnet, Charles. Analytischer Versuch über die Seelenkräfte. Bremen: Cramer, 1770.Google Scholar

Bonnet, CharlesEssai analytique sur les facultés de l’ame. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Philibert, 1769.Google Scholar

Bonnet, CharlesEssai de psychologie; ou, considérations sur les opérations de l’âme, sur l’habitude et sur l’éducation. London, 1755.Google Scholar

Bonnet, CharlesHerrn C. Bonnets, Philosophische Palingenesie, oder, Gedanken über den vergangenen und künftigen Zustand lebender Wesen. Zurich: Orell, Gessner, Füssli, 1769–70. Reprint, New York: AMS Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Bonnet, CharlesDes Herrn Karl Bonnet Psychologischer Versuch als eine Einleitung zu seinen philosophischen Schriften. Lemgo: Meyer, 1773.Google Scholar

Bonnet, CharlesLa palingénésie philosophique ou idées sur l’état passé & l’état futur des étres vivans. 2 vols. Geneva: Philibert & Chirol, 1769.Google Scholar

Bonola, Roberto. Non-Euclidean Geometry. Trans. Carslaw, Horatio Scott. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar

Bonsiepen, Wolfgang. Die Begründung einer Naturphilosophie bei Kant, Schelling, Fries und Hegel. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boole, George. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. London: Walton & Maberly, 1854.Google Scholar

Boole, GeorgeThe Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Cambridge: Macmillan, Barclay & Macmillan, 1847.Google Scholar

Boole, George “On a General Method in Analysis.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 134 (1844): 225–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordeu, Theophile. Recherches anatomiques sur la position des glandes et leur action. Paris: Quillau père, 1751.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. History of Experimental Psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.Google Scholar

Bosanquet, Bernard. History of Aesthetic. 2nd ed. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1904.Google Scholar

Bottazzini, Umberto. The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, Christophe. Le procès de l’histoire. Paris: Vrin, 2006.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew. Aesthetics and Subjectivity from Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bowie, AndrewFrom Romanticism to Critical Theory: The Philosophy of German Literary Theory. New York: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, AndrewSchelling and Modern European Philosophy: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Peter. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bowler, PeterThe Invention of Progress. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H. The Collected Works of F. H. Bradley. Ed. Mander, W. J.. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Bradley, F. HEthical Studies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H “A Personal Explanation.” International Journal of Ethics 4 (1893–4): 384–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, Ron. “Form and Cause in Goethe’s Morphology.” In Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal. Eds. Amrine, F., Wheeler, H., and Zucker, F. J.. Dordecht: Reidel, 1987.Google Scholar

Bramstead, E. K., and Melhuish, K. J. (eds.). Western Liberalism: A History in Documents from Locke to Croce. London: Longman, 1978.

Brandis, C. A. Handbuch der Geschichte der Griechisch-Römischen Philosophie. Berlin, 1835–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandis, C. AVon dem Begriff der Geschichte der Philosophie. Copenhagen, 1815.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. “Holism and Idealism in Hegel’s Phenomenology.” Hegel Studien, 36:57–92. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2001.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. “Kant – Herder – Kuhn.” Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 5 (1980): 27–36.Google Scholar

Brandwood, Leonard. “Stylometry and Chronology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. Kraut, R., 90–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Braun, Lucien. Histoire de l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris: Ophrys, 1973.Google Scholar

Breazeale, Daniel. “Two Cheers for Post-Kantianism: A Response to Karl Ameriks.” Inquiry 46, no. 2 (2003): 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bréhier, Émile. “The Formation of Our History of Philosophy.” In Philosophy and History – Essays Presented to Ernst Cassirer. Eds. Klibansky, R. and Paton, H. J.. 1936; New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar

Breitinger, Johann Jakob. Critische Dichtkunst. Zurich, 1740.Google Scholar

Brentano, Franz. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. 1874. Ed. Kraus, Oskar. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 1924.Google Scholar

Brentano, FranzPsychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Ed. McAlister, Linda L.. London: Routledge, 1973. 2nd ed. Ed. Simons, Peter. Trans. Rancurello, A. C., Terrell, D. B., and McAlister, L.. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. “Conjectural History, Sociology and Social Change in Eighteenth-Century Scotland: Adam Ferguson and the Division of Labour.” In The Making of Modern Scotland: Nation, Culture and Social Change. Eds. McCrone, David, Kendrick, Stephen, and Straw, Pat, 13–30. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Brightman, Robert. “Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relexification.” Cultural Anthropology 10 (1995): 509–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, Alexander (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Scottish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Broce, Gerald. “Herder and Ethnography.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 22 (1986): 150–70.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brooks, John I. The Eclectic Legacy: Academic Philosophy and the Human Sciences in Nineteenth-Century France. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Brown, D. G. “Mill’s Act-Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 24, no. 1 (1974): 67–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, John L. The Methodus ad Facilem Historiarum Cognitionem of Jean Bodin. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Brown, P. Hume. Life of Goethe. New York: Haskell House, 1971.Google Scholar

Brown, Thomas. Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind. 4 vols. Edinburgh: Ballantyne, 1820.Google Scholar

Browning, Robert. “Andrea del Sarto.” In My Last Duchess and Other Poems. New York: Dover, 1993.Google Scholar

Bruch, Rüdiger vom. German Universities Past and Future. Ed. Ash, M. G.. Providence, R.I.: Berghahn, 1997.Google Scholar

Brudney, Daniel. Marx’s Attempt to Leave Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Brugger, Walter. “Kant und das höchste Gut.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 18 (1964): 50–61.Google Scholar

Büchner, Ludwig. Kraft und Stoff: Empirisch-naturphilosophische Studien. 1855. In Vogt, Moleschott, Büchner: Schriften zum kleinbürgerlichen Materialismus in Deutschland. Ed. Wittich, Dieter, 2:345–516. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar

Büchner, LudwigKraft und Stoff: Grundzüge der natürlichen Weltordnung. 20th ed. Leipzig: Thomas, 1902.Google Scholar

Buck-Morss, Susan. Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budd, Malcolm. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Budd, Malcolm “The Sublime in Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1998): 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buffon, George Louis Leclerc, comte de. Les époques de la nature. Paris: Imprimerie royale, 1779.Google Scholar

Buffon, George Louis Leclerc, comte de Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière. Paris: Imprimerie royale, 1812.Google Scholar

Bullough, Edward. “The Modern Conception of Aesthetics.” In Aesthetics: Lectures and Essays, 1–89. Ed. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M.. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Bullough, Edward “‘Psychical Distance’ as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle.” British Journal of Psychology 5 (1912): 87–118. Reprinted in Aesthetics: Lectures and Essays. Ed. Elizabeth M. Wilkinson. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Bungay, Stephen. Beauty and Truth: A Study of Hegel’s Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. New York: Modern Library, 2002.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, JacobForce and Freedom: Reflections on History. Ed. Nichols, J.. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. Boulton, J. T.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar

Burke, EdmundReflections on the Revolution in France. London: Dent, 1912. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968. Ed. Mitchell, L. G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Burns, Timothy (ed.). After History? Francis Fukuyama and His Critics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.

Burrow, J. W. Evolution and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Bushnell, Horace. “Preliminary Dissertation on the Nature of Language as Related to Thought and Spirit.” In God in Christ. 1849. 3rd ed. Hartford, Conn.: W. J. Hamersley, 1852.Google Scholar

Cabanis, Pierre Jean Georges. On the Relations Between the Physical and Moral Aspects of Man. Trans. Saidi, Margaret Duggan. 2 vols. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Cabanis, Pierre Jean JosephRapports du physique et du moral de l’homme. Paris: Crapart, Caille & Ravier, 1802.Google Scholar

Cahan, David (ed.). From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Calinich, Ernst Adolf Edward. Philosophische Propädeutik für Gymnasien, Realschulen und höhere Bildungsanstalten sowie zum Selbstunterrichte. Dresden: Adler & Dietz, 1847.Google Scholar

Caneva, Kenneth. “Physics and Naturphilosophie: A Reconnaissance.” History of Science 35 (1997): 35–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canguilhem, Georges. La connaissance de la vie. Paris: Vrin, 1965.Google Scholar

Cardozo, Benjamin. Review of Roscoe Pound, Interpretations of Legal History. Harvard Law Review 37 (1924): 279–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. “Chartism.” In The Works of Thomas Carlyle. 1839. New York: Scribner, 1896–1901.Google Scholar

Carlyle, ThomasCritical and Miscellaneous Essays. Boston, 1839.Google Scholar

Carpenter, William. Principles of Mental Physiology. 6th ed. London: Kegan & Paul, 1881.Google Scholar

Carrier, Martin. “Kants Theorie der Materie und ihre Wirkung auf die zeitgenössische Chemie.” Kant-Studien 81 (1990): 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carus, Friedrich August. Geschichte der Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth, 1808.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Trans. Manheim, R.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Cassirer, ErnstThe Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Trans. Koelln, Fritz C. A. and Pettegrove, James P.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1951. Trans. Koelln, F. C. A.. Boston: Beacon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Cassirer, ErnstThe Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science, and History After Hegel. Trans. Hendel, Charles et al. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Caygill, Howard. Art of Judgment. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Charlton, D. G. Positivist Thought in France During the Second Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Chateaubriand, François-René de. Le génie du christianisme. Ed. Louvet, Louis. Paris: Garnier, n.d.

Chateaubriand, François-René deThe Genius of Christianity. Trans. Baltimore, Charles I. White., 1856. New York: Howard Fertig, 1976.Google Scholar

Chytry, Josef. The Aesthetic State: A Quest in Modern German Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Clark, Maudemarie. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Clifford, William Kingdon. The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus, 1999.Google Scholar

Cobban, Alfred. Edmund Burke and the Revolt Against the Eighteenth Century: A Study of the Political Context and Social Thinking of Burke, Wordsworth, Coleridge and Southey. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1929.Google Scholar

Coffa, J. Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A. Karl Marx’s Theory of History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin: Dummler, 1871.Google Scholar

Coleman, William. Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function and Transformation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Coleman, William. George Cuvier, Zoologist: A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions. In The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. 1. Eds. Engell, James and Jackson Bate, W.. Bollingen Series 75. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorBiographia Literaria, Edited with His Aesthetical Essays, by J. Shawcross. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorThe Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Ed. White, R. J.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorConfessions of an Inquiring Spirit. Ed. Hart, H. St. J.. 3rd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor The Friend. In The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. 4. Ed. Rooke, Barbara E.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorLay Sermons. Ed. White, Reginald James. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Comte, Auguste. Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. Ed. Lenzer, Gertrud. New York: Harper & Row, 1975; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteCatéchisme Positiviste. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1966.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteThe Catechism of Positive Religion. Trans. Congreve, Richard. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1891.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteCours de philosophie positive. 1830. Paris: Bachelier, 1842; Hermann, 1978.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteEarly Political Writings. Ed. and trans. Jones, H. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comte, AugusteA General View of Positivism. Trans. Bridges, J. H.. New York: Robert Speller, 1865.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteOeuvres d’Auguste Comte. Paris: Éditions Anthropos, 1968–71.Google Scholar

Comte, Auguste “Plan of the Scientific Operation Necessary for Reorganizing Society.” In Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. Ed. Lenzer, Gertrud. New York: Harper, 1975.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteThe Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Ed. and trans. Martineau, Harriet. London, 1853; New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1856.Google Scholar

Comte, AugusteSystem of Positive Polity or Treatise on Sociology, Instituting the Religion of Humanity. Trans. Bridges, John Henry. New York: Burt Franklin, 1968.Google Scholar

Conant, James. “Nietzsche’s Perfectionism: A Reading of ‘Schopenhauer as Educator.’” In Nietzsche’s Postmoralism. Ed. Schacht, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. Philosophical Writings. Trans. Philip, Franklin and Lane, Harlan. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar

Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. New York: Signet Classic, 1997.Google Scholar

Considérant, Victor. Bases de la politique positive: Manifeste de l’École fondée par Fourier. 2nd ed. Paris: Bureaux de la Phalange, 1842.Google Scholar

Considérant, VictorExposition abrégée du système phalanstérien de Fourier. 3rd ed. Paris: Librairie sociétaire, 1845.Google Scholar

Cook, Daniel J. Language in the Philosophy of Hegel. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.Google Scholar

Cooper, Anthony Ashley, third earl of Shaftesbury. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Ed. Klein, Lawrence E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Corsi, Pietro. The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cournot, Antoine Augustin. Matérialisme, Vitalisme, Rationalisme: Essai sur l’emploi des données de la science en philosophie. Paris: Hachette, 1875.Google Scholar

Cousin, Victor. Fragments philosophiques. Paris, 1833; Paris: Ladrange, 1838–40; Paris: Didier, 1856.Google Scholar

Cousin, VictorIntroduction à l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris, 1828.Google Scholar

Cousin, VictorThe True, the Beautiful, and the Good. Trans. Wight, O. W.. New York: D. Appleton, 1854.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert M. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Cowell, Herbert. “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Mr. John Stuart Mill.” Blackwoods Edinburgh Magazine 114 (1873): 347–62.Google Scholar

Crawford, Donald W. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Croce, Benedetto. Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. Trans. Ainslie, Douglas. Rev. ed. London: Macmillan, 1922.Google Scholar

Croce, BenedettoHistory: Its Theory and Practice. Trans. Ainslie, D.. New York: Russell & Russell, 1960.Google Scholar

Cross, Stephen. “John Hunter, Animal Physiology and Late 18th Century Physiological Discourse.” Studies in History of Biology 5 (1981): 1–110.Google Scholar

Cuvier, Georges. “Discours sur les révolutions de la surface du globe.” Foreword to Recherches sur les ossements fossiles des quadrupèdes. Paris: Detérville, 1812.Google Scholar

Cuvier, GeorgesLeçons d’anatomie comparée. Paris: Baudouin, 1801.Google Scholar

Cuvier, GeorgesLe règne animal distribué d’après son organisation. Paris: Detérville, 1817.Google Scholar

Czolbe, Heinrich. Die Grenzen und der Ursprung der menschlichen Erkenntnis im Gegensatze zu Kant und Hegel. Jena: Costenoble, 1865.Google Scholar

Czolbe, HeinrichNeue Darstellung des Sensualismus. Leipzig: Hermann,1855.Google Scholar

d’Alembert, Jean Le Rond. Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot. Trans. Schwab, Richard N.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur Coleman. Nietzsche as Philosopher. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965, 1980.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur ColemanThe Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Darnton, Robert. Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar

Darwin, CharlesThe Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray, 1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, Charles The Origin of Species. In Darwin, A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Appleman, Philip. New York: W. W. Norton, 1979.Google Scholar

Darwin, CharlesOn the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray, 1859. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Darwin, Erasmus. Zoonomia; or, the Laws of Organic Life. 2 vols. London: Johnson, 1794–6.Google Scholar

Daudin, Henri. Cuvier et Lamarck, les classes zoologiques et l’idée de série animale (1790–1830). 1923. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar

Deane, Phyllis. The Evolution of Economic Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dedekind, Richard. “Continuity and Irrational Numbers.” 1872. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 766–79. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dedekind, Richard. “On the Introduction of New Functions in Mathematics.” 1854. In From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William, 755–62. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Démar, Claire. Appel au peuple sur l’affranchissement de la femme. Ed. Pelosse, Valentin. Paris: Albin Michel, 2001.Google Scholar

De Morgan, Augustus. The Differential and Integral Calculus. London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1842.Google Scholar

De Morgan, AugustusFormal Logic. London: Taylor & Walton, 1847.Google Scholar

De Morgan, Augustus “On Divergent Series and Various Points of Analysis Connected with Them.” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 8 (1844): 182–203.Google Scholar

De Morgan, Augustus “On the Methods of Teaching the Elements of Geometry.” Quarterly Journal of Education 6 (1833): 35–49, 237–51.Google Scholar

De Morgan, AugustusOn the Study and Difficulties of Mathematics. London: Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, 1831.Google Scholar

De Morgan, AugustusOn the Syllogism and Other Writings. Ed. Heath, P.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

De Morgan, Augustus “Review of Peacock’s A Treatise on Algebra.” Quarterly Journal of Education 9 (1835): 91–110, 293–311.Google Scholar

De Morgan, AugustusTrigonometry and Double Algebra. 1849. Excerpted in From Kant to Hilbert. Ed. Ewald, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “The Pit and the Pyramid: Introduction to Hegel’s Semiology.” In Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Destutt de Tracy, Antoine Louis Claude. Élémens d’idéologie. Paris: Mme Lévi, 1801–5; Paris: Courcier, 1817.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 8th ed. 1915. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1982.Google Scholar

Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Dickie, George. The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. Le Rêve de d’Alembert. Paris, 1830.Google Scholar

Diderot, DenisRameau’s Nephew and D’Alembert’s Dream. New York: Penguin, 1966.Google Scholar

Diemer, Alwin. “Die Differenzierung der Wissenschaften in die Natur- und die Geisteswissenschaften und die Begründung der Geisteswissenschaften als Wissenschaft.” In Studien zur Wissenschaftstheorie. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain, 1968.Google Scholar

Dierse, Ulrich. “Das Begriffspaar Naturwissenschaften-Geisteswissenschaften bis zu Dilthey.” In Kultur verstehen: Zur Geschichte und Theorie der Geisteswissenschaften. Eds. Kühne-Bertram, Gudrun, Lessing, Hans-Ulrich, and Steenblock, Volker. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2003.Google Scholar

Dierse, U., Hocevar, R. K., and Dräger, H.. “Liberalismus.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Eds. Ritter, J. and Gründer, K.. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1980.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, George, and Harris, H. S. (trans.). Between Kant and Hegel. Rev. ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm. “Archive der Literatur in ihrer Bedeutung für das Studium der Geschichte der Philosophie.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 2 (1889).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmDilthey’s Philosophy of Existence: Introduction to Weltanschauungslehre. Eds. Kluback, W. and Weinbaum, M.. New York: Bookman, 1957.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften: Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte. 1883. In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1914, 2008.

Dilthey, WilhelmDie geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1924.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmGesammelte Schriften. 26 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1914–.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmIntroduction to the Human Sciences. Ed. Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmLeben Schleiermachers. 2 vols. vol. 1, 1870. Vols. 1 and 2, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1966.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmSelected Works. Eds. Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof. 5 vols. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989–2010.Google Scholar

Dini, Alessandro. Vita e organismo: Le origini della fisiologia sperimentale in Italia. Florence: Olschki, 1996.Google Scholar

Drey, Johann Sebastian von. Tübinger Theologische Quartalschrift 8 (1826).

Driesch, Hans. Analytische Theorie der organischen Entwicklung. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm. Erste Grundlehren der mathematischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Leopold Voss, 1850.Google Scholar

Drobisch, Moritz WilhelmNeue Darstellung der Logik. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Leopold Voss, 1851.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav. Grundriss der Historik. Ed. Rothacker, Erich. Halle an der Saale: Max Niemeyer, 1925.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann GustavHistorik. Ed. Leyh, P.. Stuttgart: Frommann & Holzboog, 1977.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann GustavHistorik: Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1943.Google Scholar

du Bois-Reymond, Emil. Untersuchungen über thierische Elektrizität. 1848. In Vorträge über Philosophie und Gesellschaft. Ed. Wollgast, Siegfried, 3–24. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1974.Google Scholar

Du Bos, Abbé Jean-Baptiste. Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting, and Music. Trans. Nugent, Thomas. 3 vols. London: John Nourse, 1748.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. Genèse de la théorie cellulaire. Paris: Vrin, 1987.Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre. La théorie physique, son objet, sa structure. Paris: Vrin, 1906.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael. “Frege, Gottlob.” In The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edwards, Paul. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Dummett, MichaelFrege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Dummett, MichaelFrege: Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Dummett, MichaelThe Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Dumouchel, Daniel. Kant et la genèse de la subjectivité esthétique. Paris: Vrin, 1999.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the “Two Treatises of Government.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupont, Jean-Claude. “Pre-Kantian Revival of Epigenesis: Caspar Friedrich Wolff’s De formatione intestinorum (1768–1769).” In Understanding Purpose: Kant and the Philosophy of Biology. Ed. Huneman, Philippe, 37–50. North American Kant Society Publication Series. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Dupré, Louis. “Kant’s Theory of History and Progress.” Review of Metaphysics 51 (1998): 813–28.Google Scholar

Durner, Manfred. “Theorien der Chemie.” In Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Ergänzungsband zu Werke Band 5–9. Eds. Baumgartner, Hans Michael et al., 3–161. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1994.Google Scholar

Düsing, Klaus. “Das Problem des höchsten Gutes in Kants praktischer Philosophie.” Kant-Studien 62 (1971): 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Düsing, KlausDie Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Bonn: Bouvier, 1968.Google Scholar

Düsing, Wolfgang. “Die Gegenwart im Spiegel der Vergangenheit in Herders Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte.” In Bückeburger Gespräche über Johann Gottfried Herder, 1783 Ed. Porschman, Brigitte, 33–49. Rinteln: Bösendahl, 1984.Google Scholar

Elbe, Ingo. “Soziale Form und Geschichte: Der Gegenstand des Kapital aus der Perspektive neuerer Marx-Lektüren.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58, no. 2 (2010): 221–40.Google Scholar

Eliot, George. Middlemarch. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Eliot, George “O May I Join the Choir Invisible.” In A George Eliot Miscellany: A Supplement to Her Novels. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble, 1982.Google Scholar

Ellis, J. M. Schiller’s “Kalliasbriefe” and the Study of His Aesthetic Theory. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon.Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1971–.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph WaldoEssays and Lectures. Ed. Porte, Joel. New York: Library of America, 1983.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph WaldoEssays by Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1926; Harper & Row, 1951.Google Scholar

Emerson, Roger. “American Indians, Frenchmen, and Scots Philosophers.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 9 (1979): 211–36.Google Scholar

Emundts, Dina. Kants Übergangskonzeption im Opus postumum: Zur Rolle des Nachlasswerkes für die Grundlegung der empirischen Physik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emundts, Dina, and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. G. W. F. Hegel: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 2002.Google Scholar

Engelbrecht, H. C. Johann Gottlieb Fichte: A Study of His Political Writings with Special Reference to His Nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Engell, James T. The Creative Imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdmann, Johann Eduard. Darstellung und Kritik des Cartesius, nebst einer Einleitung in die Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. Riga, 1834.Google Scholar

Erdmann, Johann EduardGrundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz, 1870.Google Scholar

Erdmann, Johann EduardGrundriss der Logik und Metaphysik. 4th ed. Halle: H. W. Schmidt, 1864.Google Scholar

Erdmann, Johann EduardOutlines of Logic and Metaphysics. Trans. Burt, B. C.. New York: Macmillan, 1896.Google Scholar

Esser, Jakob. System der Logik. 1823. 2nd ed. Münster, 1830.Google Scholar

Euler, Leonard. Letters of Euler on Different Subjects in Natural Philosophy. Addressed to a German Princess: with Notes and a Life of Brewster: Containing a Glossary of Scientific Terms with Additional Notes, by John Griscom, vol. 1. 1768. Trans. Hunter, Henry. New York: Harper, 1833.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Stephen. “Does Kierkegaard Think Beliefs Can Be Directly Willed?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (December 1989): 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eves, Howard. Great Moments in Mathematics (After 1650). Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 1981.Google Scholar

Ewald, William (ed.). From Kant to Hilbert. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

Faber, Geoffrey. Oxford Apostles. Baltimore: Penguin, 1954.Google Scholar

Fackenheim, Emil. “Kant’s Concept of History.” Kant-Studien 48 (1956–7): 381–98.Google Scholar

Farnam, Henry W. “The State and the Poor.” Political Science Quarterly 3 (1888).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fechner, Gustav. Elements of Psychophysics: Volume 1. Trans. Adler, H. E.. New York: Holt, 1966.Google Scholar

Fehr, Wayne L. The Birth of the Catholic Tübingen School: The Dogmatics of Johann Sebastian Drey. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ferreira, M. Jamie. “The Grammar of the Heart: Newman on Faith and Imagination.” In Discourse and Context: An Interdisciplinary Study of John Henry Newman. Ed. Magill, Gerard. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ferreira, M. JamieTransforming Vision: Imagination and Will in Kierkegaardian Faith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, 1993.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Trans. Loaiza, Robert de. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Ferry, LucPolitical Philosophy 2: The System of Philosophy of History. Trans. Philip, F.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity. Trans. Eliot, George. 1841. New York: Harper & Row, 1957; Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus, 1989.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigThe Essence of Faith According to Luther. Trans. Cherno, Melvin. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigGesammelte Werke. Ed. Schuffenhauer, Werner. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigLectures on the Essence of Religion. Trans. Manheim, Ralph. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigPrinciples of the Philosophy of the Future. Trans. Vogel, Manfred. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966; Indianapolis: Hackett, 1986.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigSämtliche Werke. Eds. Bolin, Wilhelm and Jodl, Friedrich. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1959.Google Scholar

Feuerbach, LudwigDas Wesen des Christentums. Ed. Schuffenhauer, Werner. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1914–. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1956.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Addresses to the German Nation. Ed. Kelly, George Armstrong. New York: Harper, 1968.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebFichte: Early Philosophical Writings. Trans. Breazeale, Daniel. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebFichtes Werke. Ed. Fichte, I. H.. 11 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1971.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebFoundations of Natural Right. Trans. Baur, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebFoundations of Transcendental Philosophy (Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo (1797/99)). Ed. and trans. Breazeale, Daniel. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebGrundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre. Jena: Gabler, 1794.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebJ. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Eds. Lauth, Reinhard and Gliwitzky, Hans. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1962–.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebJohann Gottlieb Fichtes sämmtliche Werke. Ed. Fichte, I. H.. 8 vols. Berlin: Veit., 1845–6. Reprinted as Fichtes Werke. 11 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1971.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebThe Science of Knowledge. Trans. Heath, Peter and Lachs, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebThe System of Ethics. Trans. Breazeale, D. and Zöller, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fichte, Johann GottliebThe Vocation of Man. Ed. Preuss, Peter. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Fielding, Henry. The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991.Google Scholar

Fiesel, Eva. Die Sprachphilosophie der deutschen Romantik. Tübingen: Mohr, 1927.Google Scholar

Figlio, Karl. “The Metaphor of Organization: An Historiographical Perspective on the Bio-medical Sciences of the Early Nineteenth Century.” History of Science 14 (1974): 17–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, Karl. “The Rhetoric of the Review: Schlözer and Herder on Universal History.” In The Eighteenth Century German Book Review. Eds. Rowland, Herbert and Fink, Karl, 57–72. Heidelberg: Winter, 1995.Google Scholar

Fisch, Menachem. “The Making of Peacock’s Treatise on Algebra: A Case of Creative Indecision.” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 54 (1999): 137–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Kuno. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Winter, 1895.Google Scholar

Fischer, KunoVorlesungen über Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. 8 vols. Mannheim: Basserman, 1852–60.Google Scholar

Fletcher Right, Benjamin. American Interpretations of Natural Law: A Study in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert J. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Förster, Eckart. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Forster, Georg. Werke in vier Bänden. Ed. Steiner, Gerhard. Frankfurt: Insel, 1967–70.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher.” In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. .

Forster, Michael N “Genealogy and Morality.” American Dialectic 1, no. 3 (2011).Google Scholar

Forster, Michael NGerman Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Gods, Animals, and Artists: Some Problem Cases in Herder’s Philosophy of Language.” Inquiry 46 (2003): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N“Hat jede wahre Philosophie eine skeptische Seitz?” in Skeptizismus und MetaPhysik = Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Sonderband 28. Ed. M. Gabriel. Berlin.

Forster, Michael N “Hegel and Hermeneutics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Ed. Beiser, F. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Hegel and Some (Near-)Contemporaries: Narrow or Broad Expressivism?” In Das Interesse des Denkens: Hegel aus heutiger Sicht. Eds. Welsch, W. and Vieweg, K.. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2003.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael NHegel’s Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Herder, Schlegel, Humboldt, and the Birth of Linguistics.” In German Philosophy of Language from Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Pess, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Herder’s Importance as a Philosopher.” In Von der Logik zur Sprache. Eds. Bubner, R. and Hindrichs, G.. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2007.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Herder’s Philosophy of Language, Interpretation, and Translation: Three Fundamental Principles.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2002): 323–55.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Johann Gottfried von Herder.” In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. .

Forster, Michael N “On the Very Idea of Denying the Existence of Radically Different Conceptual Schemes.” Inquiry 41, no. 2 (1998): 133–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Schleiermacher’s Hermeneutics: Some Problems and Solutions.” Harvard Review of Philosophy (2005): 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N “Socrates’ Demand for Definitions,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 31. Oxford, 2006.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael NWittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton, N.J., 2004.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Trans. Bouchard, F. and Simon, S.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Foucault, MichelLes mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.Google Scholar

Foucault, MichelThe Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House, 1970.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel “Qu’est-ce que les Lumières?” In Dits et écrits, vol. 2, 1976–88, 1498–1507. Eds. Defert, Daniel and Ewald, François. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel “What Is Enlightenment?” In The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul, 32–50. New York: Pantheon, 1984.Google Scholar

Fourier, Charles. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Anthropos, 1966.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred. Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredEine Einführung in Schellings Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1985.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredDas individuelle Allgemeine. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredDas Sagbare und das Unsagbare. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredUnendliche Annäherung: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1997.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredDer unendliche Mangel an Sein. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1975.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. “Autonomy, Necessity, and Love.” In Necessity, Volition, and Love, 129–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Franklin, Benjamin. The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, vol. 1. Ed. Smyth, Albert Henry. New York: Haskell House, 1970.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul. “All or Nothing: Systematicity and Nihilism in Jacobi, Reinhold, and Maimon.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Ed. Ameriks, Karl, 95–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: L. Nebert, 1879. Trans. Michael Beaney in The Frege Reader, 47–78. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobCollected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Ed. McGuinness, Brian. Oxford and New York: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobConceptual Notation and Related Articles. Trans. Bynum, Terrell Ward. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobThe Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. Austin, J. L.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1950. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobThe Frege Reader. Ed. Beaney, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob “Funktion und Begriff.” In Kleine Schriften. Ed. Angelelli, Ignacio, 125–42. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobGrundgesetze der Arithmetik, vol. 1. Jena: H. Pohle, 1893.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobDie Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: W. Koebner, 1884.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobNachgelassene Schriften. Eds. Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, and Kaulbach, Friedrich. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969.Google Scholar

Frege, GottlobPosthumous Writings. Eds. Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, and Kaulbach, Friedrich. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob “Über die wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 81 (1882): 48–56.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton, 1989.Google Scholar

Freud, SigmundStandard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. New York: Macmillan, 1964–.Google Scholar

Fried, Barbara. The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Fried, Michael. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Ed. Guyer, Paul, 161–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Friedman, MichaelKant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob Friedrich. Anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft. Heidelberg: Mohr & Winter, 1838.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichDie Geschichte der Philosophie. Halle, 1837.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichHandbuch der Praktischen Philosophie. Heidelberg: Mohr & Winter, 1818.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichNeue Kritik der Vernunft. Heidelberg: Mohr, 1807.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichNeue oder anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Heidelberg: Winter, 1828–31.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichSämtliche Schriften. Eds. König, Gert et al. Aalen: Scientia, 1978.Google Scholar

Fries, Jakob FriedrichSystem der Logik. 1811. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Winter, 1837.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fulda, Hans-Friedrich. “Geschichte, Weltgeist, und Weltgeschichte bei Hegel.” Annalen der Internationalen Gesellschaft für dialektische Philosophie – Societas Hegeliana 2 (1986): 58–105.Google Scholar

Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Gottfried. “Objektivität: Logik und Erkenntnistheorie bei Lotze und Frege.” In Hermann Lotze, Logik: Drittes Buch. Vom Erkennen. Ed. Gabriel, Gottfried, ix–xxxvi. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1989.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans Georg. “Hegel and Heidegger.” In Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies. Trans. Christopher Smith, P.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans GeorgTruth and Method. New York: Crossroad, 1985.Google Scholar

Galaty, David H. “The Philosophical Basis of Mid-Nineteenth Century German Reductionism.” Journal of the History of Medicine 29 (1974): 295–316.Google ScholarPubMed

Gallagher, Shaun (ed.). Hegel, History and Interpretation. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1997.

Gardiner, Patrick. Schopenhauer. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. “Philosophical Aestheticism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy. Eds. Leiter, Brian and Rosen, Michael, 75–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Gauss, Carl Friedrich. Letter to Bessel. In From Kant to Hilbert, 301. Ed. Ewald, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gauss, Carl Friedrich Letter to Schumacher. In From Kant to Hilbert, 302–5. Ed. Ewald, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gauss, Carl Friedrich Letter to Wolfgang von Bolyai. In From Kant to Hilbert, 299. Ed. Ewald, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gay, Peter. Style in History. New York: Basic, 1974.Google Scholar

Gayon, Jean. Darwin’s Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Geldsetzer, Lutz. Die Philosophie der Philosophiegeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert – Zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung und -betrachtung. Meisenheim am Glan: Hein, 1968.Google Scholar

Geldsetzer, LutzWas heisst Philosophiegeschichte?Düsseldorf: Philosophia-Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar

Gelfand, Toby. Professionalizing Modern Medicine: Paris Surgeons and Medical Science and Institutions in the 18th Century. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Genette, G. Narrative Discourse. Trans. Lewin, Jane. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gentz, Friedrich von.Briefe von und an Gentz. Eds. Wittichen, F. C. and Salzer, Ernst. 3 vols. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1909–13.

Geoffroy, Saint Hilaire Etienne. Philosophie anatomique. 2 vols. Paris: Bailliere, 1828–32.Google Scholar

Gérando, J. M. de. Histoire comparée des systèmes de philosophie relativement aux principes des connaissances humaines. Paris: Henrichs, 1804.Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Genius. London: W. Strahan, 1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerard, AlexanderVersuch über das Genie. Trans. Garve, Christian. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1776.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Volker, Mehring, Reinhard, and Rindert, Jana. Berliner Geist: Eine Geschichte der Berliner Universitätsphilosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerrish, Brian. “Faith and Existence in the Philosophy of F. H. Jacobi.” In Continuing the Reformation: Essays on Modern Religious Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. “Positivism and Its Critics.” In A History of Sociological Analysis. Eds. Bottomore, Tom and Nisbet, Robert A., 237–76. New York: Basic, 1978.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Felix. “The New Edition of J. G. Droysen’s Historik.” History and Theory 44, no. 2 (1983).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Felix “The Professionalization of History in the Nineteenth Century.” In History. Ed. Higham, John. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Felix “Ranke and the Meaning of History.” In History: Politics or Culture? 34–7. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, FelixReview essay inJournal of the History of Ideas 44, no. 2 (1983).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Katharine Everett, and Kuhn, Helmut. A History of Esthetics. Rev. ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Carlo. “Checking the Evidence.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1991): 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gipper, H. Wilhelm von Humboldts Bedeutung für Theorie und Praxis moderner Sprachforschung. Münster: Nodus, 1992.Google Scholar

Gipper, H., and P. Schmitter, . Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachphilosophie im Zeitalter der Romantik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1985.Google Scholar

Gladisch, A. Die Religion und die Philosophie in ihrer weltgeschichtlichen Entwicklung und Stellung zu einander nach den Urkunden. Breslau, 1852.Google Scholar

Glatzeder, B. Perspektiven der Wünschbarkeit: Nietzsches frühe Metaphysikkritik. Berlin: Philo-Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar

Godart, Guillaume-Lambert. La physique de l’âme humaine. Berlin: Compagnie, 1755.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Goethes Werke, vol. 12. Eds. Weber, Werner and Joachim, HansSchrimpf. Hamburg: Christian Wegner, 1953.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang vonSämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens. Eds. Richter, K. et al. 21 vols. Munich: Carl Hanser, 1985–98.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von “Toward a General Comparative Theory.” In Collected Works of Goethe, vol. 12, Scientific Works. 1790. Trans. Miller, Douglas, 54–5. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang vonZur Morphologie. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1817–24.Google Scholar

Goldie, Mark (ed.). The Reception of Locke’s Politics: From the 1690’s to the 1830’s. 6 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto; Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate, 1999.

Goldstein, Jan. Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Gomperz, T. Griechische Denker. Vienna, 1903–9.Google Scholar

Gooch, G. P. History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century. London: Longmans, 1952.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.Google Scholar

Goodman, Russell B. American Philosophy and the Romantic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodnow, Frank J. “Review of Christopher G. Tiedeman, A Treatise on the Limitations of Police Power in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (1887).Google Scholar

Gossman, Lionel. Between History and Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Gottsched, Johnann Christoph. Schriften zur Literatur. Ed. Steinmetz, Horst. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1972.Google Scholar

Gouges, Olympe de. “Les droits de la femme.” In Écrits Politiques, 1788–1791, 204–15. Paris: Côté-femmes, 1993.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen JayTime’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Grabiner, Judith. The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. “Prolegomena to Friedrich August Wolf.” In Defenders of the Text. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gray, Jeremy. “The Discovery of Non-Euclidean Geometry.” In Studies in the History of Mathematics. Ed. Phillips, Esther, 37–60. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 1987.Google Scholar

Gray, JeremyIdeas of Space, Euclidean, Non-Euclidean and Relativistic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Green, Thomas Hill. Collected Works of Thomas Hill Green. Ed. Nicholson, Peter P.. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Green, Thomas HillLectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. London: Longmans Green, 1941.Google Scholar

Green, Thomas HillProlegomena to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884.Google Scholar

Green, Thomas HillWorks of Thomas Hill Green. 3 vols. Ed. Nettleship, Richard Lewis. London: Longmans, Green, 1885–8.

Gregory, Duncan. “On the Real Nature of Symbolical Algebra.” 1838. In The Mathematical Works of Duncan Farquharson Gregory. Ed. Walton, William. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, 1865.Google Scholar

Gregory, Frederick. Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grier, Michelle. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grmek, Mirko. Raisonnement expérimental et recherches toxicologiques chez Claude Bernard. Paris: Droz, 1973.Google Scholar

Grote, George. History of Greece. London, 1846.Google Scholar

Grote, GeorgePlato and the Other Companions of Socrates. London, 1865.Google Scholar