Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- 7 Review of Methods Used in Global Work and Family Research
- 8 Meta-Analysis as a Tool to Synthesize Global Work–Family Research Findings
- 9 Conducting Qualitative Work–Family Research across Cultures
- 10 Leveraging Archival Data in Global Work–Family Research: The Case of Time Use Data
- 11 Best Practices in Scale Translation and Establishing Measurement Equivalence
- 12 Getting the Global Band Together: Best Practices in Organizing and Managing International Research Teams
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
10 - Leveraging Archival Data in Global Work–Family Research: The Case of Time Use Data
from Part III - Methodological Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- 7 Review of Methods Used in Global Work and Family Research
- 8 Meta-Analysis as a Tool to Synthesize Global Work–Family Research Findings
- 9 Conducting Qualitative Work–Family Research across Cultures
- 10 Leveraging Archival Data in Global Work–Family Research: The Case of Time Use Data
- 11 Best Practices in Scale Translation and Establishing Measurement Equivalence
- 12 Getting the Global Band Together: Best Practices in Organizing and Managing International Research Teams
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter we introduce time use data as a resource for studying work and family across cultures. We describe the historical relevance of time use studies, and the main methods of data collection. We discuss their main advantages and disadvantages, arguing that time use surveys based on diaries are the most reliable way to collect time use data. We show the existence of time use data for various countries and we discuss challenges for comparing time diary data across time and space. Data comparability and survey complexity are barriers to working with time use surveys from different countries. However, some initiatives have partially addressed these issues by providing streamlined access to the datasets and making them easier to manage. Finally, we include a case study illustrating how time diary data may be used to compare family time in the United States and Spain.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 193 - 211Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abraham, K.G., Maitland, A., & Bianchi, S.M. (2006). Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 676–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andorka, R. (1987). Time budgets and their uses. Annual Review of Sociology 13:149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevans, G. E. (1913). How Workingmen Spend Their Spare Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M.A., Sayer, L.C., & Robinson, J.P. (2000). Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor. Social Forces, 79 (September), 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P., & Milkie, M.A. (2006). Changing the Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bonke, J. (2005). Paid Work and unpaid work: diary information versus questionnaire information. Social Indicators Research 70:349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgman, B, Dugan, A., Lal, M., Osborne, M., & Villones, S. (2012). Accounting for Household Production in the National Accounts, 1965–2010. Survey of Current Business 92(5):23–36.Google Scholar
Charmes, J. (2015). Time Use Across the World: Findings of a World Compilation of Time Use Surveys. 2015 UNDP Human Development Report Office.Google Scholar
Chenu, A., & Lesnard, L. (2006). Time use surveys: a review of their Aims, methods and results. European Journal of Sociology, vol. 3(47), pp. 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P.E. (1968). Time budgets. In Sills, David (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C., & You, W. (2011). Not enough money or not enough time to satisfy the Thrifty Food Plan? A cost difference approach for estimating a money-time threshold. Food Policy 36(2):101–107.Google Scholar
Durán, M.A. (2010). Tiempo de vida y tiempo de trabajo. Conferencias Magistrales: Fundación BBVA: Bilbao.Google Scholar
Durán, M. Á. & Rogero-García, J. (2009). La investigación sobre el uso del tiempo. Cuadernos Metodológicos, Vol. 44. Madrid: CIS, p. 214.Google Scholar
Fisher, K. (2015). Metadata of Time Use Studies. Last updated 31 December 2014. Centre for Time Use Research, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. www.timeuse.org/information/studies/Google Scholar
Frazis, H., & Stewart, J. (2004). What Can Time Diary Data Tell Us About Hours of Work? Monthly Labor Review, 127(December), 3–9.Google Scholar
García Román, J., Flood, S., & Genadek, K. (2017). Parents’ time with a partner in cross-national context: A comparison of the US, Spain, and France. Demographic Research, 36 (4): 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing Times: Work and Leisure In Post-Industrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., & Harms, T. (2016). Housework Now Takes Much Less Time: 85 Years of us Rural Women’s Time Use. Social Forces 1–22.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (1998). The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis.”European Sociological Review 14(1):69–85.Google Scholar
Gracia, P., & Kalmijn, M. (2016). Parents’ family time and work schedules: The splitshift schedule in Spain. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(2): 401–415. doi:10.1111/jomf.12270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. S., & Pentland, W. E. (1999). Time use research, in Pentland, W. E. et al. (Eds.), Time Use Research in The Social Sciences, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. p. 3–18.Google Scholar
Hofferth, S.L. (1999). Family Reading to Young Children: Social Desirability and Cultural Biases in Reporting. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Measurement of and Research on Time Use, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, Washington, DC, May 27–28.Google Scholar
Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Response bias in a popular indicator of reading to children. Sociological Methodology, 36: 301–315.Google Scholar
Juster, F.T., & Stafford, F.P. (1991). The Allocation of Time: Empirical Findings, Behavioral Models, and Problems of Measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29 (June), 471–522.Google Scholar
Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33: 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneeland, H. (1929). Woman’s economic contribution in the home. In Special issue: Women in the Modern World. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 143:33–40.Google Scholar
Marini, M.M., & Shelton, B.A. (1993). Measuring household work: recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22: 369–382.Google Scholar
Michelson, W.H. (2015). Time use: Expanding Explanation in the Social Sciences. New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. (2000). Time-Use Measurement and Research: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, K., & Craig, L. (2009). Harmonising extended measures of parental childcare in the time-diary surveys of four countries – proximity versus responsibility. Electronic International journal of Time Use Research, 6 (1): 48–72.Google Scholar
Press, J.E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives’ and husband’s housework reporting. Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender and Society, 12: 188–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, S., Robinson, J. (2000). Estimating Daily Activity Times: Comparing Three Approaches in Relation to Time Diaries.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Presser, S., & Stinson, L. (1998). Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure and Source Monitoring. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.P. (1985). “The validity and reliability of diaries versus alterative time use measures.” In Juster, F.T. & Stafford, F.P. (Eds.), Time, Goods and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: University Press of Michigan. pp. 33–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P. (1999). The time diary method. Structure and uses. In Pentland, W. E. et al. (Eds.), Time Use Research in the Social Sciences, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 47–89.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The Overestimated Workweek? What Time Diary Measures Suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 117 (August), 11–23.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2007). Food Stamps, the Thrifty Food Plan, and Meal Preparation: The Importance of the Time Dimension for US Nutrition Policy. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 39(4):226–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevilla, A. (2014). On the importance of time diary data and introduction to a special issue on time use research. Review of Economics of the Household, 12, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokin, P.A., & Berger, C.Q. (1939). Time-budgets of human behaviors. Harvard Sociological Studies 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strumilin, S.G. (1925). Time-budgets of Russian workers in 1923–1924. Planovoe khozyaistvo, 7.Google Scholar
Szalai, A. (1966). The Multinational Comparative Time Budget Research Project A Venture In International Research Cooperation. American Behavioral Scientist 10 (4): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalai, A. (1984). The concept of time budget research. In Harvey, A. (Ed.), Time budget research: An ISSC workbook in comparative analysis. New York: Campus. 17–35.Google Scholar
Zuzanek, J. (1980). Work and leisure in the Soviet Union. A time-budget analysis. New York: Holt Saunders Ltd. P. 430.Google Scholar