Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:53:01.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Basic Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti  and
Daniel Perlman
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 211 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1996). Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 327–337. doi: 00838.2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., Mattiocco, M., Fallani, F. D. V., Tocci, A., … Astolfi, L. (2006, August). Hypermethods for EEG hyperscanning. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS’06. 28th Annual International Conference of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (pp. 3666–3669).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balconi, M., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2016). Interbrains cooperation: Hyperscanning and self-perception in joint actions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11, 3829–3834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Başar, E., Schmiedt-Fehr, C., Oniz, A., & Başar-Eroğlu, C. (2008). Brain oscillations evoked by the face of a loved person. Brain Research, 1214, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauregard, M., Courtemanche, J., Paquette, V., & St-Pierre, E. L. (2009). The neural basis of unconditional love. Psychiatry Research, 172, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E., & Hatfield, E. (1969). Interpersonal attraction. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., Flor, H., & Rockstroh, B. (1993). Imagery and brain processes. In Birbaumer, N. & Öhmann, A. (eds.) The structure of emotion (pp. 298–321). Toronto: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, A. P. (2013). On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1992). Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain. Doctrine of multilevel analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1019–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (2001). Social neuroscience. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds.) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14388–14391). Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Lorig, T. S., Norris, C. J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003). Just because you’re imaging the brain doesn’t mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 650–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo., S, Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, S. W. (2015). The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 733–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Cole, S. W., Capitanio, J. P., Goossens, L., & Boomsma, D. I. (2015). Loneliness across phylogeny and a call for comparative studies and animal models. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Dulawa, S., & Palmer, A. (2014). Social neuroscience and its potential contribution to psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 13, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Berntson, G. G., Ernst, J. M., Gibbs, A. C., Stickgold, R., & Hobson, J. A. (2002). Do lonely days invade the nights? Potential social modulation of sleep efficiency. Psychological Science, 13, 384–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawley, L. C., Crawford, L. E., et al. (2002). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G. G., Nouriani, B., & Siegel, D. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1054–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Norris, C. J., Decety, J., Monteleone, G., & Nusbaum, H. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 83–92. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, B. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Attitudes and cognitive response: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2181–2199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Crites, S. L. (1994). Psychophysiological approaches to attitudes: Detecting affective dispositions when people won’t say, can’t say, or don’t even know. In Shavitt, S. & Brock, T. C. (eds.) Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (pp. 43–69). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Quintanar, L. R. (1982). Individual differences in relative hemispheric alpha abundance and cognitive responses to persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Snyder, C. W. (1979). Cognitive and affective response as a function of relative hemispheric involvement. International Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Tassinary, L. G. (1990). Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd edn.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S. (2016). Neural markers of interpersonal attraction: A possible new direction for couple’s therapy. In Scarantino, A. (ed.) Emotion researcher. International Society for Research on Emotion’s source book for research on emotion & affect. Retrieved from http://emotionresearcher.com/neural-markers-of-interpersonal-attraction-a-possible-new-direction-for-couples-therapy/Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S. (2017). High-performance electrophysiological microsegmentation and brain source localization. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L., & Berntson, G. (eds.) Handbook of psychophysiology (4th edn., pp. 101–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S. (2017). Neuro-imaging of female sexual desire and hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 5(4):434–444. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Balogh, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Implicit attention to negative social, in contrast to nonsocial, words in the Stroop task differs between individuals high and low in loneliness: Evidence from event-related brain microstates. Cortex, 70, 213–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, S., Bangee, M., Balogh, S., Cardenas-Iniguez, C., Qualter, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Loneliness and implicit attention to social threat: A high performance electrical neuroimaging study. Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1070136Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Frum, C., Pfaus, J. G., & Lewis, J. W. (2012). The common neural bases between sexual desire and love: A multilevel kernel density fMRI analysis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1048–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1743–6109.2012.02651.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). Social neuroscience of love. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9, 3–13.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Decoding the invisible forces of social connections. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, Article 51, 1–7. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). Lust for life. Scientific American Mind, 24(5), 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses using high-performance electrical neuroimaging: Part II: A step-by-step tutorial. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 256, 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016a). Cognizance of the neuroimaging methods for studying the social brains. In Obhi, S. S. & Cross, E. S. (eds.) Shared representations: Sensorimotor foundations of social life (pp. 86–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016b). Research in social neuroscience: How perceived social isolation, ostracism, and romantic rejection affect our brain. In Riva, P. & Eck, J. (eds.) Social exclusion (pp. 73–88). Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2014). Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1464–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Couto, B., Bolmont, M., Sedeno, L., Frum, C., Lewis, J. W., Manes, F., Ibanez, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). Selective decision-making deficit in love following damage to the anterior insula. Current Trends in Neurology, 7, 15–19.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Scientific Reports, 3, 2027. doi: 10.1038/srep02027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, S., Grafton, S. T., & Bianchi-Demicheli, F. (2012). The speed of passionate love, as a subliminal prime: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. NeuroQuantology, 10, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Grippo, A. J., London, S., Goossens, L, & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, S., & Hatfield, E. (2015). Passionate love and sexual desire. In Whelehan, P. & Bolin, A. (eds.) Encyclopedia of human sexuality. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs335Google Scholar
Cacioppo, S., Weiss, R. M., Runesha, H. B., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2014). Dynamic spatiotemporal brain analyses using high performance electrical neuroimaging: Theoretical framework and validation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 238, 11–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, D. C., Furay, A. R., Evanson, N. K., Ostrander, M. M., Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., & Herman, J. P. (2007). Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis subregions differentially regulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity: Implications for the integration of limbic inputs. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2025–2034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coan, J. A., Beckes, L., & Allen, J. P. (2013). Childhood maternal support and neighborhood quality moderate the social regulation of neural threat responding in adulthood. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17, 1032–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01832.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S. W. (2008). Social regulation of leukocyte homeostasis: The role of glucocorticoid sensitivity. Brain Behavior and Immunity, 22, 1049–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of social regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3080–3085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., Sung, C. Y., Rose, R. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biology, 8, R189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crites, S. L. Jr., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Electrocortical differentiation of evaluative and nonevaluative categorizations. Psychological Science, 7, 318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). New developments in the scientific study of emotion: An introduction to the special section. Psychological Science, 3, 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. (1998). Are different parts of the extended amygdala involved in fear versus anxiety? Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1239–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., & Cacioppo, J. (2010). Frontiers in human neuroscience: The Golden Triangle and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 767–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 3068–3072. doi: 10.1152/jn.00473.2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWall, C. N., Masten, C. L., Powell, C., Combs, D., Schurtz, D. R., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Do neural responses to rejection depend on attachment style? An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 184–192. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donchin, E., & Heffley, E. (1978). Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In Otto, D. (ed.) Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research (pp. 555–572). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I., & Cole, S. W. (2012). Social neuroscience and health: Neurophysiological mechanisms linking social ties with physical health. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engell, A. D., Haxby, J. V., & Todorov, A. 2007. Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1508–1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Lonely hearts: Psychological perspectives on loneliness. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Romantic love: An fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 51–60. doi: 10.1152/jn.00784.2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents (trans. Riviere, J.). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Funane, T., Kiguchi, M., Atsumori, H., Sato, H., Kubota, K., & Koizumi, H. (2011). Synchronous activity of two people’s prefrontal cortices during a cooperative task measured by simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16, 077011. doi: 10.1117/1.3602853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, J. S., Hunt, W. C, Key, C. R., & Samet, J. M. (1987). The effect of marital status on stage, treatment, and survival of cancer patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 3125–3130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Love, sex and intimacy: Their psychology, biology and history. New York, NY: Harper & Collins.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2009). The neuropsychology of passionate love. In Cuyler, E. & Ackhart, M. (eds.) Psychology of relationships (pp. 1–26). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holvast, F., Burger, H., de Waal, M. M., Van Marwijk, H. W., Comijs, H. C., & Verhaak, P. F. (2015). Loneliness is associated with poor prognosis in late-life depression: Longitudinal analysis of the Netherlands study of depression in older persons. Journal of Affective Disorders, 185, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwitz, A. V., White, H. R., & Howell-White, S. (1996). Becoming married and mental health: A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of young adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T., Thompson, E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1267–1280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. M., Moser, M. B., Beckes, L., Smith, A., Dalgleish, T., Halchuk, R., … Coan, J. A. (2013). Soothing the threatened brain: Leveraging contact comfort with emotionally focused therapy. PLoS ONE 8: e79314 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juan, E., Frum, C., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Wang, Y., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, S. (2013). Beyond human intentions and emotions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 99. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, D. P., & Adolphs, R. (2012). The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 559–572. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, T., Tanabe, H. C., & Sadato, N. (2015). Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the “two-in-one” system in social interactions. Neuroscience Research, 90, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013). Theory of mind: A neural prediction problem. Neuron, 79, 836–848. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, The Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.Google Scholar
Lauder, W., Mummery, K., Jones, M., & Caperchione, C. A. (2006). Comparison of health behaviors in lonely and non-lonely populations. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1995). ’Til death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 907–914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y., & Waite, L. J. (2014). Loneliness and mortality among older adults in China. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 633–645. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Borofsky, L. A., Pfeifer, J. H., McNealy, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2009). Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: Understanding the distress of peer rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 143. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, C. L., Telzer, E. H., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 106–114. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013a). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013b). Introduction to the Special Section: 20 years of fMRI – what has it done for understanding cognition? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Carlson, A., Chang, K. M., Malave, V. L., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2008). Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science, 320(5880), 1191–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.1152876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., et al. (2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage, 16, 1159–1164. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, M. B., Johnson, S. M., Dalgleish, T. L., Lafontaine, M.‐F., Wiebe, S. A., & Tasca, G. A. (2016). Changes in relationship‐specific attachment in emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 231–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M., Glaser, K., & Grundy, E. (1997). Marital status and long-term illness in Great Britain. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najib, A., Lorberbaum, J. P., Kose, S., Bohning, D. E., & George, M. S. (2004). Regional brain activity in women grieving a romantic relationship breakup. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2245–2256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortigue, S., & Bianchi-Demicheli, F. (2008). The chronoarchitecture of human sexual desire: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage, 43, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortigue, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2007). The neural basis of love as a subliminal prime: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1218–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortigue, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Patel, N., Frum, C., & Lewis, J. (2010). Neuroimaging of love: fMRI meta-analysis evidence towards new perspectives in sexual medicine. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 3541–3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortigue, S., Michel, C. M., Murray, M. M., Mohr, C., Carbonnel, S., & Landis, T. (2004). Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words. NeuroImage, 21, 1242–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortigue, S., Sinigaglia, C., Rizzolatti, G., & Grafton, S. T. (2010). Brain dynamics and topography of decoding intentions: A combined event-related EEG/FMRI study. PLOS ONE, 5, e12160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, S. D., Cohen, S., Miller, G. E., Barkin, A., Rabin, B. S., & Treanor, J. J. (2005). Loneliness, social network size, and immune response to influenza vaccination in college freshmen. Health Psychology, 24, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandrone, S., Bacigaluppi, M. Galloni, M. R., & Martino, G. (2012). Angelo Mosso (1846–1910). Journal of Neurology, 259, 2513–2514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, S., Almeida, I., Oliveiros, B., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2016). The role of the amygdala in facial trustworthiness processing: A systematic review and meta-analyses of fMRI studies. PLoS One, 11, e0167276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, A., & Brutus, M. (1990). Neural substrate of aggression and rage in the cat. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 14, 135–233.Google Scholar
Simon, R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationship among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1065–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, D. A., & Adolphs, R. (2013). Towards a neural basis for social behavior. Neuron, 80, 816–826. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steptoe, A., Owen, N., Kunz-Ebrecht, S. R., & Brydon, L. (2004). Loneliness and neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory stress responses in middle aged men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 593–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somerville, L. H., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1007–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., & Herman, J. P. (2009). Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanderWeele, T. J., Hawkley, L. C., Thisted, R. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A marginal structural model analysis for loneliness: Implications for intervention trials and clinical practice. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 79, 225–235. doi: 10.1037/a0022610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Owerwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 48, 564–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, C., Guerra, P., Robles, H., Vila, J., & Anllo-Vento, L. (2010). Affective processing of loved faces: Contributions from peripheral and central electrophysiology. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2894–2902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wager, T. D., Lindquist, M. A, Nichols, T. E., Kober, H., & Van Snellenberg, J. X. (2009). Evaluating the consistency and specificity of neuroimaging data using meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 45, S210–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waite, L. J. (2000). Trends in men’s and women’s well-being in marriage. In Waite, L. J., Bachrach, C., Hindin, M., Thomson, E., & Thornton, A. (eds.) The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 368–392). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Waite, L. J., & Lehrer, E. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, D. L., Toufexis, D. J., & Davis, M. (2003). Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis versus the amygdala in fear, stress, and anxiety. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Ickes, W. J. (ed.) Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Woo, C. W., Koban, L., Kross, E., Lindquist, M. A., Banich, M. T., Ruzic, L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Wager, T. D. (2014). Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection. Nature Communications, 5, 5380. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Norman, C. (2001). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Blackwell hand-book of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478–501). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470998557.ch19Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Luchies, L. B. (2014). Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 398–406. doi: 10.1177/1948550613509287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., Penke, L., & Back, M. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25, 16–30. doi: 10.1002/per.768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W., & Fehr, B. (1995). On the instability of attachment style ratings. Personal Relationships, 2, 247–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.1995.tb00090.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W., Fehr, B., Keedian, E., Seidel, M., & Thomson, D. W. (1993). An exploration of the relational schemata underlying attachment styles: Self-report and lexical decision approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 746–754. doi: 10.1177/0146167293196010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W., & Meunier, J. (1999). The cued activation of attachment relational schemas. Social Cognition, 17, 209–227. doi: 10.1521/soco.1999.17.2.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (eds.) (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Huston, T., Levinger, G., et al. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 110–168). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd edn.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (eds.) Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, L., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2015). Romantic relationships, ideal standards, and mate selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.88.3.510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447–462. doi: 10.1177/0146167201274006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., Fitness, J., & Brissette, I. (2001). Understanding people’s perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 252–278). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470998557.ch10Google Scholar
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.71.4.810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.78.6.1053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, N. L., Ford, M. B., Guichard, A., & Allard, L. M. (2006). Working models of attachment and attribution processes in intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 201–219. doi: 10.1177/0146167205280907CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, N. L., Guichard, A., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment: New developments and emerging themes. In Rholes, W. S. & Simpson, J. A. (eds.) Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 196–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In Bartholomew, K. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Attachment processes in adulthood: Vol. 5. Advances in personal relationships (pp. 53–90). London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davila, J., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Attachment change processes in the early years of marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 783–802. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.76.5.783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8, 231–246. doi: 10.1007/bf02912493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durante, K. W., Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Pair-bonded relationships and romantic alternatives: Toward an integration of evolutionary and relationship science perspectives. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 1–74. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 19–46. doi: 10.1037/a0021367CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). The attachment system in fledgling relationships: An activating role for attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 628–647. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.95.3.628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1012–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0024062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. K., Krishnamurti, T., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Mispredicting distress following romantic breakup: Revealing the time course of the affective forecasting error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 623–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwick, P. W., & Neff, L. A. (2012). Do ideal partner preferences predict divorce? A tale of two metrics. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 667–674. doi: 10.1177/1948550611435941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, B. (1999). Laypeople’s perception of commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 90–103. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.76.1.90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D. (2001). Attributions in close relationships: From balkanisation to integration. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 3–31). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470998557.ch1Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Slotter, E. B., Oaten, M., & Foshee, V. A. (2009). Self-regulatory failure and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 483–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitness, J. (1996). Emotion knowledge structures in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fitness, J. (eds.) Knowledge structures in close relationships (pp. 195–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1993). Love, hate, anger and jealousy in close relationships: A cognitive appraisal and prototype analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 942–958. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.65.5.942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitness, J., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Overall, N. C. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and intimate relationships. In Hogg, M. A. & Cooper, J. (eds.) The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 258–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: /10.4135/9781848608221.n10Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O. (1995). The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Clark, M. S. (2001). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Fincham, F. D. (1991). Attributional processes in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fincham, F. D. (eds.) Cognition in close relationships (pp. 6–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Fitness, J. (eds.) (1996). Knowledge structures in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kerr, P. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658. doi: 10.1037/a0019792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., Kerr, P. S. G., Li, N. P., & Valentine, K. A. (2014). Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: Standards, accuracy, and sex differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 540–550. doi: 10.1177/0146167213519481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kininmonth, L. (1992). Measuring relationship beliefs: An individual differences scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 371–397. doi: 10.1016/0092–6566(92)90066-dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Rosanowski, J., & Fitness, J. (1994). Automatic processing in intimate contexts: The role of close-relationship beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 888–897. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.67.5.888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2013). The science of intimate relationships. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 20–36. doi: 10.1177/1745691614561683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89. 10.1037/0022–3514.76.1.72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J. O., & Thomas, G. (1996). Close relationship lay theories: Their structure and function. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fitness, J. (eds.) Knowledge structures in close relationships (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Tither, J. M., O’Loughlin, C. F., Friesen, M. D., & Overall, N. C. (2004). Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 659–672. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frei, J. R., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Respect in close relationships: Prototype definition, self-report assessment, and initial correlates. Personal Relationships, 9, 121–139. doi: 10.1111/1475–6811.00008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, M. D., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Overall, N. C. (2005) A dyadic assessment of forgiveness in intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 12, 61–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1350–4126.2005.00102.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x0000337xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselton, M. G., & Galperin, A. (2013). Error management in relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 234–254). New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.1997.tb00137.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. 10.1037/0022–3514.52.3.511CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1982). Attachment: Some conceptual and biological issues. In Parkes, C. M. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (eds.) The place of attachment in human behavior (pp. 60–76). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: A four-year prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1, 123–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.1994.tb00058.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0701_3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, J. L., Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Martin, A. M., Tran, S., & Wilson, C. L. (2012). Changes in marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: The role of adult attachment orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1506–1522. doi: 10.1177/0146167212454548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, B., Dove, N. L., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.2010.01285.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Overall, N. C., & Clark, M. S. (2012). Experiences and interpersonal consequences of hurt feelings and anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 982–1006. doi: 10.1037/a0030064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., Fann, J., & Balliet, D. B. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757–776. doi: 10.1037/a0033777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77, 933–964. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2009.00570.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, M. J., Lydon, J. E., Baccus, J. R., & Baldwin, M. W. (2010). A signal detection analysis of chronic attachment anxiety at speed dating: Being unpopular is only the first part of the problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1024–1036. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210374238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2004). Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: Should couples expect the best or brace for the worst? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729–743. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.86.5.729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K., & Olson, M. A. (2015). Integrating automatic processes into theories of relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff” … But it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.94.4.631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209–1224. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.74.5.1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881–895. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.83.4.881CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.82.4.563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.71.6.1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Friesen, M. D. (2003). Mapping the intimate relationship mind: Comparisons between three models of attachment representations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1479–1493. doi: 10.1177/0146167203251519. doi: 10.1037/e633872013-170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: Mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples’ conflict discussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 642–655. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 662–685. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.91.4.662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Fillo, J. (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of negative emotions, and hostile behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 730–749. doi: 10.1037/a0038987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639. doi: 10.1037/a0012961CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C., Girme, Y. U., Lemay, E. P. Jr., & Hammond, M. D. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 235–256. doi: 10.1037/a0034371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C. & Hammond, M. D. (2013). Biased and accurate: Depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 636–650. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, N. C. & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overbeek, G., Nelemans, S. A., Karremans, J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2013). The malleability of mate selection in speed-dating events. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1163–1171. doi:10.1007/s10508-012–0067-8. doi: doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012–0067-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P., & 118 Members of the International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.85.1.85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. London: Allen lane.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, C. G., & Overall, N. C. (2007). The boundaries between attachment and personality: Associations across three levels of the attachment network. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 960–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, C. G., & Overall, N. C. (2010). Modeling the hierarchical structure of personality-attachment associations: Domain diffusion versus domain differentiation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 47–70. doi: 10.1177/0265407509346421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) (2013). Oxford handbook of close relationships. New York, NY: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Campbell, L. (2001). The structure and function of ideal standards in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 86–106). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470998557.ch4Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Blackstone, T. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 629–641. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.69.4.629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious-ambivalent dating partners in a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.76.5.754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In Devine, T. & Plante, A. (eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 279–328). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/b978-0–12-394286–9.00006–8Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A, & Rholes, W. S. (eds.) (2015). Attachment theory and research: New directions and merging themes. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., Campbell, L., & Wilson, C. L. (2003). Changes in attachment orientations across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 317–331. doi: 10.1037/e633872013-217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support-seeking and support-giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.62.3.434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A, Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.71.5.899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Pro-relationship maintenance behavior: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 685–698. doi: 10.1037/a0016418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357–378. doi: 10.1037/a0022936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Afifi, T. D., Merrill, A. F., & Davis, S. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23, 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloia, L. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2015). Conflict intensity, family history, and physiological stress reactions to conflict within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 14, 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 107–160). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Barratt, M. S. (1995). Communication in infancy. In Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Vangelisti, A. L. (eds.) Explaining family interactions (pp. 5–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Baucom, B. R., Dickenson, J. A., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Fischer, M. S., Weusthoff, S., Hahlweg, K., & Zimmermann, T. (2015). The interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baucom, B. R., McFarland, P. T., & Christensen, A. (2010). Gender, topic, and time in observed demand–withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 570–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovill, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., & Coates, L. (1992). How do we account for the mindfulness of face-to-face dialogue? Communication Monographs, 59, 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, L. A. (1987). Symbols of relationship identity in relationship cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Berger, C. R., Gardner, R. R., Clatterbuck, G. W., & Schulman, L. S. (1976). Perceptions of information sequencing in relationship development. Human Communication Research, 3, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, C. R., & Palomares, N. A. (2011). Knowledge structures and social interaction. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.) The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th edn., pp. 169–200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14, 130–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruess, C. J. S., & Pearson, J. C. (1997). Interpersonal rituals in marriage and adult friendship. Communication Monographs, 64, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buehlman, K., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleson, B. R., Metts, S., & Kirch, M. W. (2000). Communication in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (eds.) Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 245–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byng-Hall, J. (1988). Scripts and legends in families and family therapy. Family Process, 27, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappella, J. N. (1987). Interpersonal communication: Fundamental questions and issues. In Berger, C. R. & Chaffee, S. H. (eds.) Handbook of communication science (pp. 184–238). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1988). Personal relationships, social relationships, and patterns of interaction. In Duck, S. W. (ed.) Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 325–342). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D., Freedman, V. A., Cornman, J. C., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 930–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P. (2010). A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 824–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., Basinger, E. D., & Sharabi, L. L. (2016). The connections between communication technologies and relational conflict: A multiple goals and communication interdependence perspective. In Samp, J. A. (ed.) Communicating interpersonal conflict in close relationships: Contexts, challenges and opportunities (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., Petronio, S., & Middleton, A. (2013). When families manage private information. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Routledge handbook of family communication (2nd edn., pp. 321–337). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., Scott, A. M., Miller, L. E., & Hefner, V. (2009). Putative secrets: When information is supposedly a secret. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 313–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as a predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2009). Why people conceal or reveal secrets: A multiple goals perspective. In Afifi, T. & Afifi, W. (eds.) Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 279–299). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, R. A., & Delia, J. G. (1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, C. R., Vogt, D. S., & Ickes, W. (1997). Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do? In Ickes, W. (ed.) Empathic accuracy (pp. 169–193). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. T., Tracy, K., & Spisak, F. (1986). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 436–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, D., & Whiting, G. C. (1972). An approach to communication theory: Toward consensus on rules. Journal of Communication, 22, 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1976). Interpersonal communication. New York, NY: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. (1970). Rules of conduct and the study of deviant behavior: Some notes on the social relationship. In McCall, G., McCall, M., Denzin, N., Suttles, G., & Kurth, S. (eds.) Social relationships (pp. 62–94). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doohan, E. M., Carrere, S., & Riggs, M. L. (2010). Using relational stories to predict the trajectory toward marital dissolution: The oral history interview and spousal feelings of flooding, loneliness, and depression. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, S. (1995). Talking relationships into being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 535–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, S. (2002). Hypertext in the key of G: Three types of “history” as influences on conversational structure and flow. Communication Theory, 12, 41–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, S. W., & Pond, K. (1988). Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your retrospective data: Rhetoric and reality in personal relationships. In Hendrick, C. (ed.) Review of social psychology and personality, Vol. 10: Close relationships (pp. 3–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Duck, S., Rutt, D. J., Hurst, M. H., & Strejc, H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Erbert, L. (2000). Conflict and dialectics: Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in marital conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 638–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbert, L. A., & Duck, S. W. (1997). Rethinking satisfaction in personal relationships from a dialectical perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. & Hojjat, M. (eds.) Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 190–217). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, B. A., & Drecksel, G. L. (1983). A cyclical model of developing relationships: A study of relational control interaction. Communication Monographs, 1, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O. (2015). Accuracy and bias of judgements in romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, B., Warlaumont, A. S., Messinger, D., Bene, E., Iver, S. N., & Lee, C. C. (2014). Effects of parental interaction on infant vocalization rate, variability, and vocal type. Language Learning and Development, 10, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frentz, T. S., & Farrell, T. B. (1976). Language-action: A paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, D. M. (2012). The narrative construction of intimacy and affect in narrative stories: Implications for relationship quality, stability, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1987). Narratives of relationship. In Burnett, R., McGhee, P., & Clarke, D. (eds.) Accounting for relationships (pp. 269–288). New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gillen, H. G., & Horan, S. M. (2013). Toward an understanding of the relationships among deceptive affection, deceptive beliefs, and relational qualities. Communication Research Reports, 30, 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2010). Intergenerational communication practices. In Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. (eds.) Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th edn., pp. 231–245). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In Whaley, B. & Samter, W. (eds.) Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1982). Temporal form: Toward a new language for describing relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 943–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmberg, D. Orbuch, T. L., & Veroff, J. (2004). Thrice-told tales: Married couples tell their stories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hopper, R. (1981). The taken-for-granted. Human Communication Research, 7, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R., Knapp, M. L., & Scott, L. (1981). Couples’ personal idioms: Exploring intimate talk. Journal of Communication, 31, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ickes, W. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (2002). Language and interpersonal communication. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.) Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 213–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinetob, N. A., & Smith, D. A. (1996). Demand–withdraw communication in marital interaction: Tests of interspousal contingency and gender role hypotheses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig Kellas, J., Baxter, L., LeClair-Underberg, C., Thatcher, M., Routsong, T., Lamb Normand, E., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Telling the story of stepfamily beginnings: The relationship between young adult stepchildren’s stepfamily of origin stories and their satisfaction within the stepfamily. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig Kellas, J., & Kranstuber Horstman, H (2015). Communicated narrative sense-making: Understanding family narratives, storytelling, and the construction of meaning through a communicative lens. In Turner, L., & West, R. (eds.), The Sage handbook of family communication (pp. 76–90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig Kellas, J., & Trees, A. R. (2006). Finding meaning in difficult family experiences: Interaction processes during joint family storytelling. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelli, M., & Fogel, A. (2013). Interdyad differences in early mother–infant face-to-face communication: Real-time dynamics and developmental pathways. Developmental. Psychology, 49, 2257–2271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, S. G. (2003). Rejecting illegitimate understandings. In Glenn, P. J., LeBaron, C. D., & Mandelbaum, J. (eds.) Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 195–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C. D., & Koschmann, T. (2003). Gesture and the transparency of understanding. In Glenn, P. J., LeBaron, C. D., & Mandelbaum, J. (eds.) Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 119–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., & Clark, M. S. (2015). Motivated cognition in relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). Demand–withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S., & Giles, H. (2011). Language and interpersonal communication. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.) The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th edn., pp. 201–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McLaren, R., & Sillars, A. L. (2014). Hurtful episodes in parent–adolescent relationships: How accounts and attributions contribute to the difficulty of talking about hurt. Human Communication Research, 81, 359–385.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Baker, L. R., & Olson, M. A. (2014). Implicit self-evaluations predict changes in implicit partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 25, 1649–1657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology?: Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, R. D. (1998). Giddens’ conception of personal relationships and its relevance to communication theory. In Conville, R. L. & Rogers, L. E. (eds.) Meaning of “relationship” in interpersonal communication (pp. 83–106). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, B. (1992). Communication as the interface between couples and culture. In Deetz, S. (ed.) Communication yearbook 15 (pp. 475–507). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Motley, M. T. (1990). On whether one can(not) not communicate: An examination via traditional communication postulates. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1994). Storytelling in close relationships: The construction of confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 650–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, P., & Callan, J. (1988). Understanding parent–adolescent interactions: Perceptions of family members and outsiders. Developmental Psychology, 24, 707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2012). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarby, S. M., & Halford, W. K. (2013). Couple relationship distress and observed relationship intimacy during reminiscence about positive relationship events. Behavior Therapy, 44, 686–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parks, M. R. (1982). Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. In Burgoon, M. (ed.) Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 79–107). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, R. J., & Empey, J. (1970). Interpersonal spatial orientation in dyads. Journal of Psychology, 76, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planalp, S. (1993). Friends’ and acquaintances’ conversations II: Coded differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planalp, S., & Garvin-Doxas, K. (1994). Using mutual knowledge in conversation: Friends as experts on each other. In Duck, S. (ed.) Dynamics of relationships (pp. 1–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor – A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redlick, M. H., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2018). Affection, deception, and evolution: Deceptive affectionate messages as mate-retention behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 16, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. E. (1998) The meaning of relationship in relational communication. In Conville, R. L. & Rogers, L. E. (eds.) The meaning of “relationship” in interpersonal communication (pp. 69–81). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. E., & Millar, F. E. (1988). Relational communication. In Duck, S. (ed.) Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 289–305). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Roloff, M. E., & Chiles, B. W. (2011). Interpersonal conflict: Recent trends. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.) The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th edn., pp. 423–442). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rubin, B. D. (1978). Communication and conflict: A system-theoretic perspective. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1951). The social matrix of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Schrodt, P. (2016). Relational frames as mediators of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepparent–stepchild relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81, 28–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. M., & Caughlin, J. P. (2014). Enacted goal attention in family conversations about end-of-life health decisions. Communication Monographs, 81, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, A. L. (2011). Motivated misunderstanding in family conflict discussions. In Smith, J. L., Ickes, W., Hall, J., & Hodges, S. (eds.) Managing interpersonal sensitivity: Knowing when – and when not – to understand others (pp. 193–213). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Sillars, A., & Canary, D. J. (2013). Conflict and relational quality in families. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) The Routledge handbook of family communication (pp. 338–357). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sillars, A., Roberts, L. J., Leonard, K. E., & Dun, T. (2000). Cognition during marital conflict: The relationships of thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, A., Smith, T., & Koerner, A. (2010). Misattributions contributing to empathic (in)accuracy in parent-adolescent conflict discussions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 727–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd edn.). MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Love stories. Personal Relationships, 3, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, E. (2004). Black sheep and kissing cousins: How our family stories shape us. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Street, R. L. Jr., & Cappella, N. (1985). Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior: A model and commentary. In Street, R. L. Jr. & Cappella, J. N. (eds.) Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 243–276). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Surra, C. A., & Ridley, C. (1991). Multiple perspectives on interaction: Participants, peers, and observers. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. W. (eds.) Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 35–55). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1997). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In Ickes, W. (ed.) Empathic accuracy (pp. 194–217). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, K. (1985). Conversational coherence: A cognitively-grounded rules approach. In Street, R. & Cappella, J. N. (eds.) Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 30–49). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Family secrets: Forms, functions, and correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangelisti, A. L., Crumley, L., & Baker, J. (1999). Family portraits: Stories as standards for family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangelisti, A. L., Maguire, K. C., Alexander, A. L., & Clark, G. (2007). Hurtful family environments: Links with individual, relationship, and perceptual variables. Communication Monographs, 74, 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Egeren, L. A., & Barratt, M. S. (2004). The development and origins of communication: Interactional systems in infancy. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Handbook of family communication (pp. 287–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Egeren, L. A., Barratt, M. S., & Roach, M. A. (2001). Mother–infant responsiveness: Timing, mutual regulation, and interactional context. Developmental Psychology, 37, 684–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voegtline, K. M., Costigan, K. A., Pater, H. A., & DiPietro, J. A. (2013). Near-term fetal response to maternal spoken voice. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 526–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Weakland, J. (1976). Communication theory and clinical change. In Guerin, P. (ed.) Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 111–128). New York, NY: Gardner.Google Scholar
Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2014). Constructing commitment in intimate relationships: Mapping interdependence in the everyday expressions of commitment. Communication Research, 41, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H. C., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2013). Financial strain and stressful events predict newlyweds’ negative communication independent of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. R., & Sabee, C. M. (2003). Explicating communicative competence as a theoretical term. In Greene, J. O. & Burleson, B. R. (eds.) Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 3–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

References

Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 217–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01273.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2014). Climbing Diotima’s mountain: Marriage and achieving our highest goals. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.878521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Wotman, S. R. (1992). Breaking hearts: The two sides of unrequited love. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bringle, R. G., Winnick, T., & Rydel, R. J. (2013). The prevalence and nature of unrequited love. SAGE Open, 3(2) doi: 10.1177/2158244013492160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, L. (1999). Gender, emotion, and the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E. A. (2015). Interpersonal affect dynamics: It takes two (and time) to tango. Emotion Review, 7, 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, E. O., Gardner, W. L., & Anderson, J. F. (2015). Emotionships: Examining people’s emotion-regulation relationships and their consequences for well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 407–414. doi 10.1177/1948550614564223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1997). Misery and company. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Willingness to express emotion: The impact of relationship type, communal orientation, and their interaction. Personal Relationships, 12, 169–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00109.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M., Fitness, J., & Brissette, I. (2001). Understanding people’s perceptions of their relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology. Volume 2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 253–278). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Donato, S., Parise, M., Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Finkenauer, C., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514541071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duprez, C., Christophe, V., Rimé, B., Congard, A., & Antoine, P. (2015). Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 757–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514548393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, B., & Baldwin, M. (1996). Prototype and script analyses of laypeople’s knowledge of anger. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fitness, J. (eds.) Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 219–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fehr, B., Baldwin, M., Collins, L., Patterson, S., & Benditt, R. (1999). Anger in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 299–312. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 464–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with a romantic partner. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2001.44.3.263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P., Haslam, N., & Fiske, S. T. (1991). Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 656–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.656CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitness, J. (1996). Emotion knowledge structures in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fitness, J. (eds.) Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 195–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fitness, J. (2001). Betrayal, rejection, revenge, and forgiveness. In Leary, M. R. (ed.) Interpersonal rejection (pp. 73–103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitness, J., & Duffield, J. (2004). Emotion and communication in families. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Handbook of family communication (pp. 473–495). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fitness, J., & Fletcher, G. J. (1993). Love, hate, anger, and jealousy in close relationships: A prototype and cognitive appraisal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 942–958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitness, J., & Warburton, W. (2009). Thinking the unthinkable: Cognitive appraisals and hurt feelings. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Feeling hurt in close relationships (pp. 34–49). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511770548.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In Emmons, R. A. & McCullough, E. (eds.) The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. (1991). The sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1994). The lex talionis: On vengeance. In van Goozen, S. H. M., van de Poll, N. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (eds.) Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 263–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Shure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H., Mesquita, B., Sonneman, J., & Van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena. In Strongman, K. (ed.) International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 187–225). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2001). Appetitive and aversive social interaction. In Harvey, J. H & Wenzel, A. (eds.) Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 169–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gareis, E., & Wilkins, R. (2011). Communicating love: A sociocultural perspective. In Salmon, C. T. (ed.) Communication yearbook 35 (pp. 199–239). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. L., & Baucom, D. H. (2009). Examining the individual within marriage: Personal strengths and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 16, 421–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01231.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Driver, J., & Tabares, A. (2015). Repair during marital conflict in newlyweds: How couples move from attack–defend to collaboration. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 26, 85–108. doi: 10.1080/08975353.2015.1038962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R.W. (2002). A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: Exploratory analysis using 14-year longitudinal data. Family Process, 41, 83–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, S. M., Huang, J. Y., Clark, M. S., & Helgeson, V. S. (2008). The positives of negative emotions: Willingness to express negative emotions promotes relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J. J. (2014a). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In Gross, J. J. (ed.) The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd edn., pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (ed.) (2014b). The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K. (2013). Emotion and communication in conflict interaction. In Oetzel, J. G. & Ting-Toomey, S. (eds.) The Sage handbook of conflict communication (2nd edn., pp. 105–131). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kamashiro, M. (2010). In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayal. Personal Relationships, 17, 253–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01275.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harasymchuk, C., & Fehr, B. (2009, February). Relational boredom and conflict as distinct relationship maintenance challenges: An analysis of daily appetitive and aversive experiences. Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
Harber, K. D., & Cohen, D. J. (2005). The emotional broadcaster theory of social sharing. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X05281426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673–685. doi: org/10.1037/h0047884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, C. & Floyd, K. (2011). Affection mediates the impact of alexithymia on relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, A. M., & Diamond, L. M. (2008). How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events. Personal Relationships, 15, 205–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00194.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, S. D., Lewis, K. L., & Ickes, W. (2015). The matter of other minds: Empathic accuracy and the factors that influence it. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 319–348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14344–012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W. J. (ed.) (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E., Woodburn, E. M., Finlon, K. J., Krauthamer-Ewing, E. S., Grossman, S. R., & Seidenfeld, A. (2011). Emotion knowledge, emotion utilization, and emotion regulation. Emotion Review, 3, 44–52. doi: 10.1177/1754073910380972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, E., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Emotional experience as a function of social context: The role of the other. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024904019590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. M., & Brubacher, L. L. (2016). Emotionally focused couples therapy: Empiricism and art. In Sexton, T. & Lebow, J. (eds.) Handbook of family therapy (2nd edn., pp. 326–348). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., Ybema, J. F., & Wobbes, T. (2002). The relation between perceived inequity, marital satisfaction and emotions among couples facing cancer. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 39–57. doi: 10.1348/014466602165045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labouvie-Vief, G., Devoe, M., & Bulka, D. (1989). Speaking about feelings. Psychology and Aging, 4, 425–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.4.425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambert, N. M., Gwinn, A. M., Baumeister, R. F., Strachman, A., Washburn, I. J., Gable, S. L., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A boost of positive affect: The perks of sharing positive experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512449400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. L. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, R. W., Haase, C. M., Bloch, L., Holley, S. R., & Seider, B. H. (2014). Emotion regulation in couples. In Gross, J. J. (ed.) The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd edn., pp. 267–283). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Manstead, A. S. R., & Fisher, A. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (eds.) Appraisal processes in emotion (pp. 221–232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). The commitment-insurance system: Self-esteem and the regulation of connection in close relationships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00001-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Griffin, D. W., & Derrick, J. L. (2015). The equilibrium model of relationship maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 93–113. http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.uccs.edu/10.1037/pspi0000004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noller, P., & Ruzzene, M. (1991). Communication in marriage: The influence of affect and cognition. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Fincham, F. (eds.) Cognition in close relationships (pp. 203–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. E. (1999). Effects of a child’s death on the marital relationship. Omega, 39, 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2190/1L3J-42VC-BE4H-LFVUCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérusse, F., Boucher, S., & Fernet, M. (2012). Observation of couple interactions: Alexithymia and communication behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planalp, S. (1999). Communication and emotion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planalp, S., Metts, S., & Tracy, S. (2010). The social matrix of emotion expression and regulation. In Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. (eds.) Handbook of communication science (2nd edn., pp. 363–379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences 49, 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., de Jong, D. C., Lee, K. Y., O’Keefe, S. D., & Peters, B. J. (2016). Promoting intimacy: Strategies suggested by the appetitive side (pp. 3–29). In Knee, C. R. & Reis, H. T. (eds.) Positive approaches to optimal relationship development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In Gross, J. J. (ed.) The handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V., & Kime, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12, 145–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00106.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, K. (2007). Hard and soft emotion during conflict: Investigating married couples and other relationships. Personal Relationships, 14, 65–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00142.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (eds.) (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoebi, D., & Randall, A. K. (2015). Emotional dynamics in intimate relationships. Emotion Review, 7, 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further explorations of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenk, J. W. (2015). Powers of two. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Slotter, E. B., Finkel, E. J., Dewall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Lambert, N. M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 291–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21, 195–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.1.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2001). A comparison of emotional consequences of and change in equity over time using global and domain-specific measures of equity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501184003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06289215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, L., Prabu, D., & McPherson, S. (2014). Sanctity of marriage and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513486975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surra, C. A., & Ridley, C. A. (1991). Multiple perspectives on interaction: Participants, peers, and observers. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. (eds.) Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 35–55). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., & Fisher, K. W. (eds.) (1995). The self-conscious emotions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. J. (2000). Recent development in alexithymia theory and research. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370004500203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, A., & Bolger, N. (1999). Emotional transmission in couples under stress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 38–48. doi: 10.2307/353881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44(2), 112–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (eds.) (2005). The sociology of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) (2009). Feeling hurt in close relationships. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 890–905. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×