Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- 1 What Is Culture?
- 2 What Is Intercultural Communication?
- 3 Rethinking Intercultural Competence
- 4 Interculturality or Transculturality?
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
3 - Rethinking Intercultural Competence
from Part I - Introducing Intercultural Communication
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- 1 What Is Culture?
- 2 What Is Intercultural Communication?
- 3 Rethinking Intercultural Competence
- 4 Interculturality or Transculturality?
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- Index
- References
Summary
Jürgen Bolten explores intercultural competence as a form of general ‘action competence’, which is implemented in intercultural, i.e. uncertain contexts. In the context of increasing social mobility at nearly all levels and in most professions, intercultural competence is highlighted as more relevant today than ever before. However, that relevance correlates with a ‘rethinking’ of the concept, within which intercultural competence research has to expand its own horizons by integrating the hitherto still dominant focus on national cultural diversity into the much more complex field of micro-cultural diversity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 56 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Baten, L., Dusar, L. and Van Maele, J. (2011). Toolkit Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC). http://cefcult.eu/ data/ CEFcult_toolkit_ students_2011–11FIN.pdf (last accessed 10 February 2015).Google Scholar
Benseler, F. et al., ed. (2003). Interkulturelle Kompetenz – Grundlagen, Probleme und Konzepte. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 14(1), 137–228.Google Scholar
Bolten, J. (2011). Unschärfe und Mehrwertigkeit: ‘Interkulturelle Kompetenz’ vor dem Hintergrund eines offenen Kulturbegriffs. In Dreyer, W. and Hößler, U., eds., Perspektiven interkultureller Kompetenz. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 55–70.Google Scholar
Bolten, J. (2014). The Dune model. AFS Intercultural Link, 5(1), 4–8. https://issuu.com/afsintercultural programs/docs/afs_intercultural _link_ news_magazin_779a 7ea814ec10 (last accessed 17 September 2018)Google Scholar
Bolten, J. (2015). Megacities: A Simulation Game for virtual classrooms. Jena, www.intercultural-campus.org (last accessed 17 September 2018).Google Scholar
Bolten, J. (2017). Rethinking Intercultural Learning Processes. In Goethe Institut, ed., German Language. www.goethe.de/en/spr/mag/20906565.html (last accessed 17 September 2018).Google Scholar
Brislin, R. (1981). Cross-Cultural Encounters: Face-to-Face Interaction. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Buhse, W. (2014). Management by Internet: Neue Führungsmodelle für Unternehmen in Zeiten der digitalen Transformation. Kulmbach: Plassen.Google Scholar
Byram, M. and Zarate, G. (1997). Definitions, objectives and assessment of sociocultural competence. In Byram, M., Zarate, G. and Neuner, G., eds., Sociocultural Competence in Language Learning and Teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, pp. 9–45.Google Scholar
Chen, G. M. and Starosta, W. G. (1998). Foundations of Intercultural Communication. Needham Heights, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Policy Paper zur Interkulturellen Kompetenz. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/de/media/xcms_bst _dms_17145_ 17146_2, p. 14 (last accessed 30 July 2013).Google Scholar
Deardorff, D. K, ed. (2009). The Sage Handbook of Intercultural Competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Delamare-Le-Deist, F. and Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
Erpenbeck, J. (2010). Interkulturelle Kompetenz ohne interkulturelle Kompetenzen? In Faix, W. G. and Aue, M., eds., Talent: Kompetenz. Management, 22nd ed. Stuttgart: Steinbeis-Edition, pp. 269–300.Google Scholar
Fritz, W., Möllenberg, A. and Chen, G.-M. (2004). Die interkulturelle Sensibilität als Anforderung an Entsandte: Bedeutung und Elemente für ein Messmodell. In Wiedemann, K.-P. (ed.), Fundierung des Marketing. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, pp. 231–58.Google Scholar
Gertsen, M. C. (1990). Intercultural competence and expatriates. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(3), 341–62.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Das Individuum im öffentlichen Austausch: Mikrostudien zur öffentlichen Ordnung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gröschke, D. (2009). Interkulturelle Kompetenz in Arbeitssituationen – Eine handlungstheoretische Analyse individueller und kollektiver Fähigkeiten. Munich: Rainer Hampp Verlag.Google Scholar
Gröschke, D. and Bolten, J. (2012). Approaches to intercultural competence and its development. Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies, 23, 43–81.Google Scholar
Hackl, B., Wagner, M., Attmer, L. and Baumann, D. (2017). New Work: Auf dem Weg zur neuen Arbeitswelt. Heidelberg: Gabler.Google Scholar
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J. and Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–43.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, T. M. and Stahl, G. (1998). Diagnose interkultureller Kompetenz: Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines Assessment Centers. In Barmeyer, C. and Bolten, J., eds., Interkulturelle Personalorganisation. Sternenfels: Wissenschaft & Praxis, pp. 213–24.Google Scholar
Lysgaard, S. (1955). Adjustment in a foreign society: Norwegian Fulbright grantees visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin, 7(1), 45–51.Google Scholar
Mack, O. et al., ed. (2016). Managing in a VUCA World. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, J. and Kilian-Yasin, K. (2013). Interkulturelles Lernen im berufsbezogenen Kontext. In Helmolt, K. v., Berkenbusch, G. and Jia, W., ed., Interkulturelle Lernsettings: Konzepte, Formate, Verfahren. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag, pp. 151–74.Google Scholar
Nazarkiewicz, K. (2016). Kulturreflexivität statt Interkulturalität? Interculture Journal, 15(26), 23–31.Google Scholar
Peña, J. (2008). Effektivität und Angemessenheit: Messung interkultureller Kompetenz im Assessment Center. Unpublished dissertation, University of Jena.Google Scholar
Petry, T. (2016). Digital leadership: Unternehmens- und Personalführung in der digital economy. In Petry, T., ed., Digital Leadership: Erfolgreiches Führen in Zeiten der Digital Economy, 1st ed. Freiburg: Haufe, pp. 21–82.Google Scholar
Pottinger, P. S. and Goldsmith, J., eds. (1979). Defining and Measuring Competence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rathje, S. (2006). Interkulturelle Kompetenz: Zustand und Zukunft eines umstrittenen Konzepts. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 11(3), 1–21. http://zif.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/jg-11-3/beitrag/Rathje1.htm (last accessed 17 September 2018).Google Scholar
Rauner, F. (2004). Praktisches Wissen und berufliche Handlungskompetenz. Bremen: University of Bremen.Google Scholar
Ruben, B. D. (1976). Assessing communication competency for intercultural adaptation. Group & Organization Studies, 1(3), 334–54.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1979). Strukturen der Lebenswelt, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stahl, G. (1998). Internationaler Einsatz von Führungskräften. Munich and Vienna: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stüdlein, Y. (1997). Management von Kulturunterschieden: Phasenkonzept für internationale strategische Allianzen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3(1), 28–44.Google Scholar
Zülch, M. (2004). ‘McWorld’ oder “Multikulti”?: Interkulturelle Kompetenz im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. In Vedder, G., ed., Diversity Management und Interkulturalität. Munich: Hampp, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by