Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:02:09.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Corrective Feedback in Mobile Technology-Mediated Contexts

from Part VI - Contexts of Corrective Feedback and Their Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Hossein Nassaji
University of Victoria, British Columbia
Eva Kartchava
Carleton University, Ottawa
Get access


This chapter discusses the role of corrective feedback in mobile technology-mediated contexts. It begins by briefly discussing the role of technology in second language learning and teaching, focusing on mobile technology and explaining its affordances. It then examines the role that mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) can play in providing and monitoring corrective feedback in language learning. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical implications as well as directions for future research on MALL-supported corrective feedback.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abdous, M., Camarena, M. M. & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 7695.Google Scholar
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199226.Google Scholar
Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 110.Google Scholar
Ally, M., McGreal, R., Schafer, S., Tin, T. & Cheung, B. (2007). Use of mobile learning technology to train ESL adults. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mobile Learning (pp. 7–12). Melbourne.Google Scholar
Ally, M. & Samaka, M. (2016). Guidelines for design and implementation of mobile learning. In B. H. Khan (ed.), Revolutionizing modern education through meaningful e-learning implementation (pp. 161176). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0466-5.ch009.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A. & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591647.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120136.Google Scholar
Brown, E. (ed.). (2001). Mobile learning explorations at the Stanford Learning Lab. Speaking of Computers (issue 55, January 8). Scholar
Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344357.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (2008). Computer assisted language learning. In Spolsky, B. & Hult, F. M. (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 585595). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A., Mardomingo, R. & Valentine, C. (2009). Mobile blogs in language learning: making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(1), 96112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demouy, V. & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010) On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217232.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114138). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1), 1841.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2005a). What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17(2), 269288.Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2005b). Analyzing recent CALL effectiveness research – Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1–2), 132.Google Scholar
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L. & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70105.Google Scholar
Grhurovic, M., Chapelle, C. & Shelley, M. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2), 165198.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated Discourse. Language@Internet, 4, article 1. Scholar
Hsu, H-Y., Wang, S-K. & Comac, L. (2008). Using audioblogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181198.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183210.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 7995.Google Scholar
Kim, H-S. (2013). Emerging mobile apps to improve English listening skills. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 16(2), 1130.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2), 2035.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L. and Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: A guide for teachers. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). Overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271289.Google Scholar
Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. Calico Journal, 27(2), 260276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A. & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects of self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning and Technology, 17(3), 135156.Google Scholar
Li, C. (2009). SMS-based vocabulary learning for ESL students. Master’s thesis, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. Scholar
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W. & Liakina, N. (2014). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO, 32(1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W. & Liakina, N. (2017a). The pedagogical use of mobile speech synthesis (TTS): focus on French liaison. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 325342.Google Scholar
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W. & Liakina, N. (2017b). Mobilizing instruction in a second-language context: Learners’ perceptions of two speech technologies. Languages, 2(3), 11, 121. Scholar
Lin, H. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261287.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L. & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research in computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250273.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. II: Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mak, B. & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Honk Kong. System, 36(3), 437455.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.). (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noriega, H. S. R. (2016). Mobile learning to improve writing in ESL teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 27(2), 182202.Google Scholar
Palalas, A. (2011). Mobile-assisted learning: Designing for your students. In Thouësny, S. & Bradley, L. (eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers (pp. 7194). Dublin: Scholar
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In Warschauer, M. & Kern, R. G. (eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 5986). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 12.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 813.Google Scholar
Procter-Legg, E., Cacchione, A. & Petersen, S. A. (2012). LingoBee and social media: Mobile language learners as social networkers. Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) (Madrid, Spain, Oct 19-21, 2012).Google Scholar
Reinders, H. & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood, (ed.), Contemporary computer assisted language learning (pp. 359375). London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. L. & Anderson, T. A. F. (2015). Extra-dimensional in-class communications: Action research exploring text chat support of face-to-face writing. Computers and Composition, 35, 5264.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day, (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Shi, Z., Luo, G. & He, L. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning using WeChat instant messaging. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2), 1626.Google Scholar
Shih, R.-C., Lee, C. & Cheng, T.-F. (2015). Effects of English spelling learning experience through a mobile LINE app for college students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 26342638.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Scholar
Sung, Y., Chang, K. & Yang, J. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16(Complete), 6884.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158164.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A. & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, Synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528546.Google Scholar
Taj, I. H., Sulan, N. B., Sipra, M. A. & Ahmad, W. (2016). Impact of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL: A meta-analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 7683.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. M. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 309318.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217228.Google Scholar
Vandergriff, I. (2016). Second-language discourse in the digital world: Linguistic and social practices in and beyond the networked classroom. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 726.Google Scholar
Wu, Q. (2015). Pulling mobile assisted language learning (MALL) into the mainstream: MALL in broad practice. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128762.Google Scholar
Xu, Q., Dong, X. Q. & Jiang, J. (2017). EFL learners’ perceptions of mobile-assisted feedback on oral production. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 408417.Google Scholar
Xu, Q. & Peng, H. (2017). Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 173182.Google Scholar
Young, E. H. & West, R. E. (2018). Speaking practice outside the classroom: A literature review of asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication in language learning. EuroCALL Review, 26(1), 5978.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Song, W. & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203214.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 727.Google Scholar
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553586.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats