Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:10:08.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Get access


Abstract: Compliance has become important in our contemporary markets, societies, and modes of governance across very different public and private domains, stimulating a rich body of empirical work and practical expertise. Yet, so far, we do not have a comprehensive understanding of what compliance is and what mechanisms and interventions play a role in shaping it, or how compliance shapes various fields. Thus far, the academic knowledge of compliance has remained siloed in different disciplinary domains, and along different regulatory and legal spheres and different mechanisms and interventions. This chapter, which is the introduction to The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance, offers a comprehensive view of what compliance is. It takes a broad approach in seeing compliance as the interaction between rules and behavior. It discusses what different mechanisms and interventions are at play in shaping such compliance. And it reflects on the different methods for studying compliance and their inherent limitations.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M.. 1979. “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory.” American Sociological Review 44:635.Google Scholar
Akers, Ronald. 2017. Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexander, Cindy R., Bauguess, Scott W., Bernile, Gennaro, Lee, Yoon-Ho Alex, and Marietta-Westberg, Jennifer. 2013. “Economic Effects of SOX Section 404 Compliance: A Corporate Insider Perspective.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 56(2):267–90.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Ariely, Dan. 2012. The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone–Especially Ourselves. New York: HarperCollins UK.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Max H., and Tenbrunsel, Ann E.. 2012. Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bachireddy, Chethan, Joung, Andrew, John, Leslie K., Gino, Francesca, Tuckfield, Bradford, Foschini, Luca, and Milkman, Katherine L.. 2019. “Effect of Different Financial Incentive Structures on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Network Open 2 (8):113.Google Scholar
Chhaochharia, Vidhi, and Yaniv, Grinstein. 2007. “Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules.” Journal of Finance, 62 (4):1789825.Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B. 2007. “Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control.” Psychometrika 72 (2):263–8. doi: 10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., and Goldstein, Noah J.. 2004. “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology 55:591621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., Demaine, Linda J., Sagarin, Brad J., Barrett, Daniel W., Rhoads, Kelton, and Winter, Patricia L.. 2006. “Managing Social Norms for Persuasive Impact.” Social Influence 1 (1):315.Google Scholar
Cochran, John K., and Chamlin, Mitchell B.. 2000. “Deterrence and Brutalization: The Dual Effects of Executions.” Justice Quarterly 17 (4):685706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, John K., Chamlin, Mitchell B., and Seth, Mark. 1994. “Deterrence or Brutalization: An Impact Assessment of Oklahoma’s Return to Capital Punishment.” Criminology 32:107.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, and Lazer, David. 2003. “Management‐Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals.” Law & Society Review 37 (4):691730.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacqueline. 1983. “Incapacitation as a Strategy for Crime Control: Possibilities and Pitfalls.” Crime and Justice:184.Google Scholar
Costa, Elisio, Giardini, Anna, Savin, Magda, Menditto, Enrica, Lehane, Elaine, Laosa, Olga, Pecorelli, Sergio, Monaco, Alessandro, and Marengoni, Alessandra. 2015. “Interventional Tools to Improve Medication Adherence: Review of Literature.” Patient Preference and Adherence 9:1303.Google Scholar
Cullen, Francis T., Jonson, Cheryl Lero, and Nagin, Daniel S.. 2011. “Prisons Do Not Reduce Recidivism: The High Cost of Ignoring Science.” Prison Journal 91 (3 suppl.):48S65S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, John M., Carlsmith, Kevin M., and Robinson, Paul H.. 2001. “The ex ante Function of the Criminal Law.” Law and Society Review 35 (1):165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Talesh, Shauhin A.. 2011. “To Comply or Not to Comply – That Isn’t the Question: How Organizations Construct the Meaning of Compliance.” In Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, edited by Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, 103–22. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B., Petterson, S., Chambliss, E., and Erlanger, H. S.. 1991. “Legal Ambiguity and the Politics of Compliance: Affirmative Action Officers’ Dilemma.” Law & Policy 13 (1):7397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. “Social Norms and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4):99117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, Vicki, Daha, Thea J., Brug, Hans, Richardus, Jan Hendrik, Behrendt, Myra D., Vos, Margreet C., and van Beeck, Ed F.. 2010. “Systematic Review of Studies on Compliance with Hand Hygiene Guidelines in Hospital Care.” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 31 (3):283–94.Google Scholar
Falk Moore, S. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7 (4):719–46.Google Scholar
Feldman, Yuval. 2018. The Law of Good People: Challenging States’ Ability to Regulate Human Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, Rorie, Melissa, and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2019. “Rule-Breaking without Crime: Insights from Behavioral Ethics for the Study of Everyday Deviancy.” The Criminologist 44 (2):811.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Elsbach, Kimberly D.. 2000. “Ethnography and Experiment in Social Psychological Theory Building: Tactics for Integrating Qualitative Field Data with Quantitative Lab Data.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36 (1):5176.Google Scholar
Gammon, John, Samuel, Heulwen Morgan, and Gould, Dinah. 2008. “A Review of the Evidence for Suboptimal Compliance of Healthcare Practitioners to Standard/Universal Infection Control Precautions.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 17 (2):157–67.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo. 2000. “A Fine Is a Price.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):117.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Noah J., Cialdini, Robert B., and Griskevicius, Vladas. 2008. “A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels.” Journal of Consumer Research 35:472–82.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C., and Silbey, Susan S.. 2012. “The Other Side of the Compliance Relationship.” In Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, edited by Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, 123–38. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C., and Silbey, Susan S.. 2014. “Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance.” American Journal of Sociology 120 (1):96145.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John. 2003. “The Social Working of Legal Rules.” Journal of Legal Pluralism (48):172.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Thornton, Dorothy, and Kagan, Robert A.. 2005. “Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environmental Protection.” Law & Policy 27 (2):289316.Google Scholar
Iliev, Peter. 2010. “The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality and Stock Prices (August 26, 2009).” Journal of Finance 65 (3):1163–96. or Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan, Bradford, Ben, Hough, Mike, Myhill, Andy, Quinton, Paul, and Tyler, Tom R.. 2012. “Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions.” British Journal of Criminology 52 (6):1051–71.Google Scholar
Jin, Jing, Sklar, Grant Edward, Sen Oh, Vernon Min, and Li, Shu Chuen. 2008. “Factors Affecting Therapeutic Compliance: A Review from the Patient’s Perspective.” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 4 (1):269.Google ScholarPubMed
Jolls, Christine, Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, Richard. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.” Stanford Law Review:1471550.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., and Scholz, John T.. 1984. “The ‘Criminology of the Corporation’ and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies.” In Regulatory Enforcement, edited by Hawkins, Keith and Thomas, John M., 6795. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., and Posner, Eric A.. 1999. “Shaming White-Collar Criminals: A Proposal for Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (S1):365–92.Google Scholar
Kessler, Daniel, and Levitt, Steven D.. 1999. “Using Sentence Enhancements to Distinguish between Deterrence and Incapacitation.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (S1):343–64.Google Scholar
Labrague, L. J., McEnroe‐Petitte, D. M., Van de Mortel, T., and Nasirudeen, A. M. A.. 2018. “A Systematic Review on Hand Hygiene Knowledge and Compliance in Student Nurses.” International Nursing Review 65 (3):336–48.Google Scholar
Lange, B. 1999. “Compliance Construction in the Context of Environmental Regulation.” Social & Legal Studies 8 (4):549–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, Mark W., and Cullen, Francis T.. 2007. “The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:297320.Google Scholar
Makkai, Toni, and Braithwaite, John. 1994. “Reintegrative Shaming and Compliance with Regulatory Standards.” Criminology 32 (3):361–85.Google Scholar
Marvell, Thomas B., and Moody, Carlisle E.. 2001. “The Lethal Effects of Three-Strikes Laws.” Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):89106.Google Scholar
Memon, Khalida Naz, Shaikh, Nudrat Zeba, Soomro, Rafique Ahmed, Shaikh, Shazia Rehman, and Khwaja, Anza Mansoor. 2017. “Non-compliance to Doctors’ Advices among Patients Suffering from Various Diseases: Patients Perspectives: A Neglected Issue.” Journal of Medicine 18 (1):1014.Google Scholar
Miles, Thomas J., and Ludwig, Jens. 2007. “The Silence of the Lambdas: Deterring Incapacitation Research.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23 (4):287301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 2013. “Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century.” Crime and Justice 42 (1):199263.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S., and Pepper, John V., eds. 2012. Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S., and Telep, Cody W.. 2017. “Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13:528.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S., Cullen, Francis T., and Jonson, Cheryl Lero. 2009. “Imprisonment and Reoffending.” Crime and Justice 38 (1):115200.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Gilad, Sharon. 2011. “Internal Corporate Compliance Management Systems: Structure, Culture and Agency.” In Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, edited by Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, 170–95. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Parker, C., and Nielsen, V.. 2009a. “The Challenge of Empirical Research on Business Compliance in Regulatory Capitalism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:4570.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann. 2009b. “Corporate Compliance Systems: Could They Make Any Difference?Administration & Society 41 (1):337.Google Scholar
Plambeck, Erica L., and Taylor, Terry A.. 2015 [online]. “Supplier Evasion of a Buyer’s Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility.”; 2016. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 18 (2):184–97.Google Scholar
Reardon, Gregory, Kotak, Sameer, and Schwartz, Gail F.. 2011. “Objective Assessment of Compliance and Persistence among Patients Treated for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review.” Patient Preference and Adherence 5:441.Google Scholar
Ryan, Kevin F. 1998. “Clinging to Failure: The Rise and Continued Life of the U.S. Drugs Policy.” Law and Society Review 32:221.Google Scholar
Schell‐Busey, Natalie, Simpson, Sally S., Rorie, Melissa, and Alper, Mariel. 2016. “What Works? A Systematic Review of Corporate Crime Deterrence.” Criminology & Public Policy 15 (2):387416.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. Wesley, Nolan, Jessica M., Cialdini, Robert B., Goldstein, Noah J., and Griskevicius, Vladas. 2007. “The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms.” Psychological Science 18 (5):429–34.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2005. “Deterrence versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment’s Differing Impacts among States.” Michigan Law Review:203–56.Google Scholar
Simpson, Sally, Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel Elise, Schell-Busey, Natalie, Laufer, William, and Smith, N. Craig. 2014. “Corporate Crime Deterrence: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 10 (4):588.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2009. “The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law.” Law & Society Review 43 (3):527–62.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin, and Pélisse, Jérôme. 2019. “How Legal Intermediaries Facilitate or Inhibit Social Change.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 79:111–45.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Thornton, Dorothy, Gunningham, Neil, and Kagan, Robert A.. 2005. “General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior.” Law & Policy 27 (2):262–88.Google Scholar
Travis, Jeremy, Western, Bruce, and Redburn, Steve. 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. 2017. “Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment?Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13:2953.Google Scholar
Van Erp, Judith. 2011. “Naming without Shaming: The Publication of Sanctions in the Dutch Financial Market.” Regulation & Governance 5 (3):287308.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin. 2020. “Behavioral Jurisprudence: The Quest for Knowledge about the ex-ante Function of Law and Behavior.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 22(1):57–77.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin, and Fine, Adam. 2018. “Toxic Corporate Culture: Assessing Organizational Processes of Deviancy.” Administrative Sciences 8 (3):2361.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, Benjamin, and Fine, Adam. 2019. “Preventing Corporate Crime from Within.” In The Handbook of White Collar Crime, edited by Rorie, Melissa, 229–45. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Walters, Glenn D., and Bolger, P. Colin. 2019. “Procedural Justice Perceptions, Legitimacy Beliefs, and Compliance with the Law: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 15 (3):341–72.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunmei, and van Rooij, Benjamin. 2019. “Compliance Dynamism: Capturing the Polynormative and Situational Nature of Business Responses to Law.” Journal of Business Ethics:113.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats