Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T02:27:14.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Latin trinitarian theology

from Part II - Retrieving the sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2011

Michel René Barnes
Affiliation:
Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA
Peter C. Phan
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

The first question that faces anyone writing on early Latin trinitarian theology is that of when or with whom to begin the account. The earliest Western Christian texts were written in Greek: should they be considered part of “Latin trinitarian theology”? Should some of these Greek writings be considered “Latin” on the basis of their origin in Rome (or Gaul)? The Greek work Contra Noetum (Against Noetus) attributed to Hippolytus and written in Rome is so like Tertullian's Latin Adversus Praxean (Against Praxeas) written in Carthage that the two works seem almost to originate from the same community. I have opted for the straightforward criterion of language: if a text was originally written in Latin it falls within my brief. This decision allows one to discern continuities of vocabulary across texts, for example. Once this decision has been made, two important facts reveals themselves: the font of Latin trinitarian theology is Tertullian, and the internal disposition – the “logic” – of that theology originates in anti-monarchianism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Evans, Ernest, Tertullian's Treatise against Praxeas (London: SPCK, 1948)Google Scholar
Butterworth, Robert, with Greek text facing: Hippolytus of Rome – Contra Noetum (London: Heythrop Monographs, 1977)Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean, Gospel Message and Hellenistic Culture, trans. John Austin Baker (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1973), 345–86Google Scholar
Heine, Ronald, “The Christology of Callistus,” Journal of Theological Studies, 49 (1998), 56–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Simone, R. J., The Treatise of Novatian the Roman Presbyter on the Trinity (Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, 1970)Google Scholar
McDonald, M. F. as The Divine Institutes (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1964)Google Scholar
Cipriani, Nello, “La presenza di Mario Victorino nella riflessione trinitaria di Agostino,” Augustinianum, 42 (2002), 261–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint Augustine: The Trinity, trans. Hill, Edmund (Brooklyn, NY: New City Press, 1991)
Ayres, Lewis, Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Michel René, “The Use of Augustine in Contemporary Trinitarian Theology,” Theological Studies, 56 (1995), 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavel, T. J. van, Recherches sur la christologie de saint Augustin, Paradosis, 10 (Fribourg: Éditions Universaires Fribourg Suisse, 1954).Google Scholar
D'Alès, A., Novatien: Étude sur la theólogie romaine au milieu du iii siècle (Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne, 1925).Google Scholar
Daley, Brian, “The Giant's Twin Substance: Ambrose and the Christology of Augustine's Contra sermonem Arianorum,” in Joseph Lienhard, Earl Muller, and Roland Teske, eds., Collectanea Augustiniana (New York: Peter Lang, 1993), 477–95.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean, The Origins of Latin Christianity, trans. David Smith and John Austin Baker, ed. and with a postscript by John Austin Baker (London: Darton, Longman & Todd;Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977).Google Scholar
Meslin, Michel, Les ariens d'Occident 335–430 (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1967).Google Scholar
Weedman, Mark, The Trinitarian Theology of Hilary of Poitiers (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Daniel H., Ambrose of Milan and the End of the Nicene–Arian Conflicts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×