Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:31:27.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Revelation

from Part I - Theological topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2006

Edward T. Oakes, S. J.
Affiliation:
University of St Mary of the Lake, Mundelein Seminary, Illinois
David Moss
Affiliation:
The Diocese of Exeter
Get access

Summary

REASON, REVELATION, AND THE LIBERAL PROJECT

It must be admitted that 'revelation' as a theological topic is not without ambiguity. The very definition of revelation is in dispute, with critics pointing to its rather vague delineation as a separate topic of theological discourse well into the medieval period. Rather than getting bogged down in these sorts of questions, however, perhaps the best place to begin a treatment of Hans Urs von Balthasar's theology of revelation would be with his most basic assertion: in revelation we have a sovereign divine action pro nobis that makes God known to his creatures in a manner that they can apprehend (LA, 7-8). It is God who speaks in revelation and it is humanity who listens and responds. Even if it must be admitted that divine revelation makes use of worldly forms and words, these structures are 'taken up' into an essentially divine act and given a new context within a divinely constructed 'form' (Gestalt). For Balthasar, revelation is not a species of a much broader genus that can be loosely called 'religious manifestations' or 'divine epiphanies'. In Christ we have an utterly unique event without parallel that judges all human expectations rather than being judged and tamed by them. There are definite affinities with Barth here in Balthasar's insistence that revelation carries within itself its own theological warrant, its own self-authenticating, 'engracing' logic. Balthasar does not deny that there is a role for analogy, philosophy, and 'natural theology'. However, the issue is whether anthropology and/or cosmology will be allowed to govern christology, rather than the reverse. And on that issue he is consistently, even rigorously clear: Balthasar will reject any systematic approach that attempts to locate the significance of revelation within an overarching ideological scheme of some kind, especially when the attempt is made reductively to 'explain' revelation as an outcropping or even as an epiphenomenon of various anthropological capacities or cosmological processes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Revelation
  • Edited by Edward T. Oakes, S. J., University of St Mary of the Lake, Mundelein Seminary, Illinois, David Moss, The Diocese of Exeter
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar
  • Online publication: 28 May 2006
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521814677.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Revelation
  • Edited by Edward T. Oakes, S. J., University of St Mary of the Lake, Mundelein Seminary, Illinois, David Moss, The Diocese of Exeter
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar
  • Online publication: 28 May 2006
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521814677.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Revelation
  • Edited by Edward T. Oakes, S. J., University of St Mary of the Lake, Mundelein Seminary, Illinois, David Moss, The Diocese of Exeter
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar
  • Online publication: 28 May 2006
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521814677.002
Available formats
×