To Southern judges, was a slave property or a human being made after the image of the Creator? For many disputes, the judiciary considered the slave virtually the same as a valuable steed. But slaves, unlike their equine counterparts, possessed reason and imagination. Of all living property, the slave alone could mimic the master. Consequently, a slave often was equal to his owner in donning the mantle of the reasonable person, even though fortune – or, more accurately, misfortune – had cast him in the role of property. In recognizing the twofold nature of the slave, antebellum judges balanced the property interests of the master against the wider interests of Southern society. The result was a set of legal rules that tended to be efficient, at least within its peculiar context.