Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T21:16:54.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Paolo Crivelli
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Aristotle on Truth , pp. 284 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AA. VV. 1936, Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique (Sorbonne, Paris, 1935), ⅵ, Paris
AA. VV. 1953, Actes du XIème Congrès International de Philosophie, Bruxelles, 20–26 Août 1953, Amsterdam and Louvain
AA. VV. 1960, Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia (Venezia, 12–18 Settembre 1958), ⅺ, Florence
AA. VV. 1975, Scritti in onore di † Carlo Diano, Bologna
AA. VV. 1985, Sapienza antica. Studi in onore di Domenico Pesce, Milan
AA. VV. 1986, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité, Brussels
AA. VV. 1988, Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Papyrology, 1, Athens
Abbagnano, N. 1971, Dizionario di Filosofia, 2nd edn, Turin
Abrusci, V. M., Casari, E., and Mugnai, M. (eds.) 1983, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica, San Gimignano, 4–8 dicembre 1982, Bologna
Ackrill, J. L. 1972, ‘Aristotle on “Good” and the Categories’ = Ackrill (1997), 201–11
Ackrill, J. L. 1997, Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford
Ackrill, J. L. (trans. and comm.) 1963, Aristotle, Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford
ACPA = Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Adorno, F. 1961, La filosofia antica, ⅰ, Milan
AGPh = Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Alberti, A. (ed.) 1990, Logica, mente e persona. Studi sulla filosofia antica, Florence
Alberti, A. (ed.) 1994, Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica, Florence
Albritton, R. A. 1957, ‘Present Truth and Future Contingency’, PR 66: 29–46Google Scholar
Algra, K. A. A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 1999, The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge
Algra, K. A. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. T. (eds.) 1996, Polyhistor: Studies … Presented to Jaap Mansfeld …, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Angelelli, I. and Cerezo, M. (eds.) 1996, Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the History of Logic, Berlin and New York
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1956/68, ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle: De Interpretatione, Chapter IX’ = Moravcsik (1968), 15–33
Anscombe, G. E. M. and Geach, P. T. 1961, Three Philosophers, Oxford
Antiseri, D. (trans. and comm.) 1969, Aristotele, De Interpretatione, Bergamo
Anton, J. P. 1992, ‘On the Meaning of Kategoria in Aristotle's Categories’ = Preus/Anton (1992), 1–18
AP = Ancient Philosophy
Apelt, O. 1891a, Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Leipzig
Apelt, O. 1891b, ‘Die Kategorieenlehre des Aristoteles’ = Apelt (1891a), 101–216
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1966, Aristotle, Metaphysics, Bloomington, Ind. and London
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1980, Aristotle, Categories and Propositions (De Interpretatione), Grinnell, Ia
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1981, Aristotle, On the Soul, Grinnell, Ia
Arens, H. 1984, Aristotle's Theory of Language and its Tradition: Texts from 500 to 1750, Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Astroh, M. 1981, ‘Apophansis und Kontingenz. Zum neunten Kapitel der Schrift Peri Hermeneias’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 43: 328–62Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. 1962/83, Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne, 5th edn, Paris
Aubenque, P. 1979a, ‘La pensée du simple dans la Métaphysique (Ζ 17 et Θ 10)’ = Aubenque (1979b), 69–80
Aubenque, P. (ed.) 1979b, Etudes sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote – Actes du VIe Symposium Aristotelicum, Paris
Aubenque, P. (ed.) 1980, Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, Paris
Austin, J. L. 1950, ‘Truth’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 149–61
Avgelis, N. and Peonidis, F. (eds.) 1998, Aristotle on Logic, Language and Science, Thessaloniki
BACAP = Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy
Bäck, A. T. 1992, ‘Sailing through the Sea Battle’, AP 12: 133–51Google Scholar
Bäck, A. T. 2000, Aristotle's Theory of Predication, Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
Badawi, A. 1971, Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en Grec, Beirut
Badawi, A. 1987, La transmission de la philosophie grecque au monde arabe, 2nd edn, Paris
Baldassarri, M. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1985/87, La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti, Como
Bambrough, R. (ed.) 1965, New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London and New York
Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.) 1965, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, Amsterdam
Barnes, J. 1986, ‘Peripatetic Negations’, OSAP 4: 201–14Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1993, ‘Meaning, Saying and Thinking’ = Döring/Ebert (1993), 47–61
Barnes, J. 1995a, ‘Metaphysics’ = Barnes (1995b), 66–108
Barnes, J. 1996, ‘Grammar on Aristotle's Terms’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 175–202
Barnes, J. 1999a, ‘Aristotle and Stoic Logic’ = Ierodiakonou (1999), 23–53
Barnes, J. 1999b, ‘Logic: I The Peripatetics’ = Algra/Barnes/Mansfeld/Schofield (1999), 77–83
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1995b, The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge
Barnes, J. (trans. and comm.) 1994, Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, 2nd edn, Oxford
Bärthlein, K. 1972, Die Transzendentalienlehre der alten Ontologie, ⅰ, Berlin and New York
Battegazzore, A. M. (ed.) 1993, Dimostrazione, argomentazione dialettica e argomentazione retorica nel pensiero antico. Atti del Convegno di Filosofia (Bocca di Magra, 18–22 marzo 1990), Genoa
Baudry, L. 1950, La querelle des futurs contingents (Louvain 1465–1475). Textes inédits, Paris
Baylis, C. A. 1936, ‘Are Some Propositions neither True nor False?’, Philosophy of Science 3: 156–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaney, M. 1996, Frege: Making Sense, London
Becker, A. 1936, ‘Bestreitet Aristoteles die Gültigkeit des “Tertium non datur” für Zukunftsaussagen? (Zum 9. Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik)’ = AA. VV. (1936), 69–74
Becker, O. 1957a, Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik, Wiesbaden
Becker, O. 1957b, ‘Chrysippos über den “Lügner”’ = O. Becker (1957a), 50–2
Bekker, I. and Gigon, O. (eds.) 1960/87, Aristotelis Opera, 2nd ed., Berlin
Belardi, W. 1977, ‘Semantica di σύνδ∊σμος e di ἀσύνδ∊τος in Aristotele’, Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 105: 257–73Google Scholar
Bencivenga, E., Lambert, K., and van Fraassen, B. C. 1986/91, Logic, Bivalence, and Denotation, 2nd edn, Atascadero, Calif
Benson, H. H. 1988, ‘Universals as Sortals in the Categories’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 282–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Zeev, A. 1984, ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Truth and Falsity’, Apeiron 18: 118–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, E. 1978, ‘The Intellection of “Indivisibles” according to Aristotle, de Anima III 6’ = Lloyd/Owen (1978), 141–63
Berti, E. 1983a, ‘La fonction de Métaph. Alpha Elatton dans la philosophie d’Aristote’ = Moraux/Wiesner (1983), 260–94
Berti, E. 1983b, ‘Quelques remarques sur la conception aristotélicienne du non-être’, RPA 1: 115–42Google Scholar
Berti, E. 1990, ‘Heidegger e il concetto aristotelico di verità’ = Brague/Courtine (1990), 97–120
Berti, E. 1992, Aristotele nel Novecento, Rome and Bari
Berti, E. 1993, ‘Intellezione e dialettica in Aristotele, Metaph. IX 10’ = Battegazzore (1993), 21–36
Berti, E. 1994, ‘Encore sur l’intellection des “indivisibles” selon Aristote, De anima III 6’ = Alberti (1994), 123–36
Berti, E. 1996a, ‘Encore sur l’intellection des “indivisibles” selon Aristote, De anima III 6’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 391–404
Berti, E. 1996b, ‘La logica dell’argomentazione filosofica tra Aristotele e Ryle’ = Guetti/Pujia (1996), 59–68
Berti, E. 2000, ‘I luoghi della verità secondo Aristotele. Un confronto con Heidegger’ = Melchiorre (2000), 3–27
Berti, E. (ed.) 1981, Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’ – Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum Held in Padua from September 7 to 15, 1978, Padua
Berti, E. (ed.) 1997, Guida ad Aristotele, Rome and Bari
Besoli, S. 1985, ‘Percezione, verità e giudizio: luoghi dell’intuizionismo aristotelico’ = Besoli (2002), 9–54
Besoli, S. 2002, Esistenza, verità e giudizio. Percorsi di critica e fenomenologia della conoscenza, Macerata
BICS = Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Bird, O. 1964, Syllogistic and Its Extensions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Birondo, N. 2001, ‘Aristotle on Illusory Perception: Phantasia without Phantasmata’, AP 21: 57–71Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. (eds.) 1999, Truth, Oxford
Blanché, R. and Dubucs, J. 1970/96, La logique et son histoire, Paris
Blank, D. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8, London
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (eds., trans., and comm.) 1998, On Determinism: Ammonius On Aristotle On Interpretation 9 with Boethius On Aristotle On Interpretation 9 First and Second Commentaries, London
Blettner, E. 1983, ‘One Made Many and Many Made One: The Role of Asyndeton in Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16: 49–54Google Scholar
Block, I. 1961, ‘Truth and Error in Aristotle's Theory of Sense Perception’, PQ 11: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford
Bobzien, S. 2000, ‘Wholly Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Phronesis 45: 87–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2002, ‘The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd Century ad’, Phronesis 47: 359–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochenski, I. M. 1947, La logique de Théophraste, Fribourg en Suisse
Bochenski, I. M. 1951, Ancient Formal Logic, Amsterdam
Bochenski, I. M. 1962, Formale Logik, 2nd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Bodéüs, R. (trans. and comm.) 1993, Aristote, De l’âme, Paris
Bodéüs, R. (ed. and comm.) 2001, Aristote, [Catégories], Paris
Boehner, P., Moody, E. A., Gál, G., Gambatese, A., and Brown, S. (eds.) 1978, William of Ockham, Expositionis in Libros Artis Logicae Prooemium, Expositio in Librum Porphyrii de Predicabilibus, Expositio in Librum Praedicamentorum Aristotelis, Expositio in Librum Perihermeneias Aristotelis, Tractatus de Praedestinatione et de Praescientia Dei respectu Futurorum Contingentium, St Bonaventure, NY
Bolton, R. 1976, ‘Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, II, 7–10’, PR 85: 514–44Google Scholar
Bonitz, H. 1842, Observationes criticae in Aristotelis libros metaphysicos, Berlin
Bonitz, H. 1862/67, Aristotelische Studien, repr., Hildesheim 1969
Bonitz, H. 1870, Index Aristotelicus, repr., Graz 1955
Bonitz, H. (ed. and comm.) 1848/49, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Bonn
Bonitz, H. (trans.) 1890, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, repr., Munich 1966
Bonomi, A. and Zucchi, A. 2001, Tempo e linguaggio. Introduzione alla semantica del tempo e dell’aspetto verbale, Milan
Bormann, K. 1982, ‘Wahrheitsbegriff und νοῦς-Lehre bei Aristoteles und einigen seiner Kommentatoren’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 12: 1–24Google Scholar
Bosley, R. 1977, ‘In Support of an Interpretation of On Int. 9’, Ajatus 37: 29–40Google Scholar
Bostock, D. (trans. and comm.) 1994, Aristotle, Metaphysics: Books Ζ and H, Oxford
Bottani, A., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P. (eds.) 2002, Individuals, Essence and Identity: Themes of Analytic Metaphysics, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Boudot, M. 1973, ‘Temps, nécessité et prédétermination’, Les Études Philosophiques n.n.: 435–73
Bradley, R. D. 1959/68, ‘Must the Future Be What It Is Going to Be?’ = Gale (1968), 232–51
Brague, R. and Courtine, F. (eds.) 1990, Herméneutique et ontologie. Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris
Brakas, G. 1988, Aristotle's Concept of the Universal, Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York
Brandis, C. A. 1835/66, Handbuch der Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Philosophie, Berlin
Brandis, C. A. 1862/64, Geschichte der Entwicklungen der griechischen Philosophie und ihrer Nachwirkungen im römischen Reiche, repr., Hildesheim and New York 1981
Brandis, C. A. (ed.) 1823, Aristotelis et Theophrasti Metaphysica, Berlin
Brandt, R. 1965, Die Aristotelische Urteilslehre. Untersuchungen zur ‘Hermeneutik’, Marburg
Brentano, F. 1862, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles, repr., Darmstadt 1960
Brentano, F. 1874/1925, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, ed. by O. Kraus, repr., Hamburg 1955 and 1959
Brentano, F. 1889, ‘Über den Begriff der Wahrheit’ = Brentano (1930), 3–29
Brentano, F. 1909, ‘De Interpretatione’ = Brentano (1986), 59–65
Brentano, F. 1914a, ‘Über die Entstehung der irrigen Lehre von den entia irrealia’ = Brentano (1930), 162–4
Brentano, F. 1914b, ‘Zur Frage der Existenz der Inhalte und von der adaequatio rei et intellectus’ = Brentano (1930), 121–30
Brentano, F. 1915a, Letter to O. Kraus dated 9 January, 1915, partly quoted in Brentano (1930), 219–20
Brentano, F. 1915b, ‘Über den Sinn des Satzes: veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus’ = Brentano (1930), 131–6
Brentano, F. 1930, Wahrheit und Evidenz, ed. by O. Kraus, repr., Hamburg 1974
Brentano, F. 1952, Grundlegung und Aufbau der Ethik, ed. by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Bern
Brentano, F. 1986, Über Aristoteles, ed. by R. George, Hamburg
Brentano, F. n.d., ‘Aristoteles’ Lehre von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden’ = Brentano (1986), 190–7
Brown, L. 1994, ‘The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’ = Everson (1994), 212–36
Brunschwig, J. 1969, ‘La proposition particulière et les preuves de non-concluance chez Aristote’, Cahiers pour l’Analyse 10: 3–26Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1979, ‘La forme, prédicat de la matière?’ = Aubenque (1979b), 131–66
Brunschwig, J. 1991, ‘On a Book-Title by Chrysipppus: “On the Fact that the Ancients Admitted Dialectic along with Demonstrations”’, OSAPsuppl. vol.: 81–95Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1999, ‘Homonymie et contradiction dans la dialectique aristotélicienne’ = Büttgen/Diebler/Rashed (1999), 81–101
Brunschwig, J. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1967, Aristote, Topiques, ⅰ, Paris
Buhle, I. T. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1792/1800, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Graece …, Biponti
Bullinger, A. 1882, Aristoteles’ Nus-Lehre (De an. III, c. 4–8 incl.), Dillingen
Burnyeat, M. 2002, ‘De Anima II 5’, Phronesis 47: 281–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. et al. 1984, Notes on Eta and Theta of Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford
Burrell, D. 1964, ‘Aristotle and “Future Contingencies”’, Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 13: 37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, C., Dübner, F., and Heitz, A. (eds. and trans.) 1848/74, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Graece et Latine, Paris
Butler, R. J. 1955, ‘Aristotle's Sea Fight and Three-Valued Logic’, PR 64: 264–74Google Scholar
Butterworth, C. E. (trans. and comm.) 1983, Averroes, Middle Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Princeton
Büttgen, P., Diebler, S., and Rashed, M. (eds.) 1999, Théories de la phrase et de la proposition de Platon à Averroès, Paris
Bywater, I. 1913, ‘Aristotelia V’, The Journal of Philology 32: 107–22Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed. and comm.) 1909, Aristotle, On the Art of Poetry, Oxford
Cahn, S. M. 1967, Fate, Logic, and Time, New Haven and London
Calogero, G. 1927, ‘Una nuova concezione della logica prearistotelica’ = Calogero (1984), 349–62
Calogero, G. 1927/68, I fondamenti della logica aristotelica, 2nd edn, Florence
Calogero, G. 1984, Scritti minori di filosofia antica, Naples
Capozzi, G. 1974, Giudizio, prova e verità. I principi della scienza nell’analitica di Aristotele, Naples
Carson, D. S. 1996, Being and Truth: Elements of Aristotle's Philosophy of Language, diss. (Duke University)
Casari, E. 1984, ‘Note sulla logica aristotelica della comparazione’, Sileno 10: 131–46Google Scholar
Cashdollar, S. 1973, ‘Aristotle's Account of Incidental Perception’, Phronesis 18: 156–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B. 1996, ‘Enquête sur le logos dans le De anima’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 257–93
Cassirer, H. 1932, Aristoteles’ Schrift ‘Von der Seele’ und ihre Stellung innerhalb der aristotelischen Philosophie, Tübingen
Caston, V. 1996, ‘Why Aristotle Needs Imagination’, Phronesis 41: 20–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1998a, ‘Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1998b, ‘Commentary on Kurt Pritzl: Aristotle on the Conditions of Thought’, BACAP 14: 202–12Google Scholar
Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.) 2002, Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, Aldershot
Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (eds.) 1950, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Duodecim Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio, Turin and Rome
Cavini, W. 1985, ‘La negazione di frase nella logica greca’ = Cavini/Donnini Macciò/Funghi/Manetti (1985), 7–126
Cavini, W. 1993a, ‘Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar’ = Döring/Ebert (1993), 85–109
Cavini, W. 1993b, ‘Aristotele e i modi del paradosso’ = Battegazzore (1993), 61–81
Cavini, W. 1998, ‘Arguing from a Definition: Aristotle on Truth and the Excluded Middle’ = Avgelis/Peonidis (1998), 5–15
Cavini, W., Donnini Macciò, M. C., Funghi, M. S., and Manetti, D. 1985, Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, Florence
Celluprica, V. 1977, Il capitolo 9 del ‘De interpretatione’ di Aristotele. Rassegna di studi: 1930–1973, Bologna
Celluprica, V. 1987, ‘Logica e semantica nella teoria aristotelica della predicazione’, Phronesis 32: 166–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 1994, ‘Aristotle on Names and Their Signification’ = Everson (1994), 37–73
Charles, D. 1997, ‘Method and Argument in the Study of Aristotle: A Critical Notice of The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’, OSAP 15: 231–57Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000, Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford
Charles, D. 2002, ‘Some Comments on Prof. Enrico Berti's “Being and Essence in Contemporary Interpretations of Aristotle”’ = Bottani/Carrara/Giaretta (2002), 109–26
Chisholm, R. M. 1966, Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Chisholm, R. M. and Haller, R. (eds.) 1978, Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos: Beiträge zur Brentano-Konferenz (Graz, 4.–8. September 1977), Amsterdam
Christ, W. (ed.) 1906, Aristotelis Metaphysica, 2nd edn, Leipzig
Church, A. 1965, ‘The History of the Question of Existential Import of Categorical Propositions’ = Bar-Hillel (1965), 417–24
Cleary, J. J. 1988, Aristotle on the Many Senses of Priority, Carbondale and Edwardsville
Code, A. 1976, ‘Aristotle's Response to Quine's Objections to Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5: 159–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, G. (trans. and comm.) 1955, Aristotele, Organon, Turin
Conybeare, F. C. 1892, Anecdota Oxoniensia: A Collation with the Ancient Armenian Versions of the Greek Text of Aristotle's Categories, de Interpretatione, de Mundo, de Virtutibus et Vitiis, and of Porphyry's Introduction, Oxford
Cooke, H. P. and Tredennick, H. (eds. and trans.) 1938, Aristotle, The Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Cope, E. M. and Sandys, J. E. (eds. and comm.) 1877, The Rhetoric of Aristotle, Cambridge
Corsi, G., Mangione, C., and Mugnai, M. (eds.) 1989, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica. Le teorie delle modalità (San Gimignano, 5–8 dicembre 1987), Bologna
Cosenza, P. 1983, ‘Procedimenti di trasformazione nella sillogistica di Aristotele’ = Abrusci/Casari/Mugnai (1983), 223–8
Cosenza, P. 1987, Logica formale e antiformalismo (da Aristotele a Descartes), Naples
Craig, W. L. 1988, The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingency from Aristotle to Suarez, Leiden, New York, Copenhagen, and Cologne
Cresswell, M. J. 1971, ‘Essence and Existence in Plato and Aristotle’, Theoria 37: 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1989, ‘Presupposti esistenziali della negazione in Aristotele’, Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia – Università di Firenze 5: 45–90Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1990, ‘Il “Sofista” di Platone. Non essere, negazione e falsità’, Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’ 55: 9–104Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1996, ‘Notes on Aristotle's Conception of Truth’ = Funghi (1996), 147–59
Crivelli, P. 1999, ‘Aristotle on the Truth of Utterances’, OSAP 17: 37–56Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2001, ‘Empty Terms in Aristotle's Logic’, BACAP 17: 237–69, 282–4Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2002, ‘Sameness in Aristotle's Topics’ = Bottani/Carrara/Giaretta (2002), 239–45
Damschen, G. 2001, ‘Aristoteles, “Analytica Posteriora” A 2, 72a8–9: “Der eine Teil einer Aussage”’, Hermes 129: 125–8Google Scholar
Dancy, R. M. 1986, ‘Aristotle and Existence’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 49–80
Dapunt, I. 1968, ‘Zwei Typen von Systemen der traditionellen Logik’, AGPh 50: 275–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 1994, Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth, New York and Oxford
Davidson, D. 1996, ‘The Folly of Trying to Define Truth’, JP 93: 263–78Google Scholar
Décarie, V. 1961, L’objet de la métaphysique selon Aristote, Montreal and Paris
De Corte, M. 1934, La doctrine de l’intelligence chez Aristote, Paris
de Koninck, T. 1990, ‘La noêsis et l’indivisible selon Aristote’ = Mattéi (1990), 215–28
del Punta, F. (ed.) 1979, William of Ockham, Expositio super Libros Elenchorum, St Bonaventure, NY
Demoss, D. andDevereux, D. T. 1988, ‘Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics II 8–10’, Phronesis 33: 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deninger, J. G. 1961, ‘Wahres Sein’ in der Philosophie des Aristoteles, Meisenheim am Glan
Denyer, N. 1991, Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy, London and New York
de Rijk, L. M. 1952, The Place of the Categories of Being in Aristotle's Philosophy, Assen
de Rijk, L. M. 1987, ‘The Anatomy of the Proposition: Logos and Pragma in Plato and Aristotle’ = de Rijk/Braakhuis (1987), 27–61
de Rijk, L. M. 1996, ‘On Aristotle's Semantics in de Interpretatione 1–4’ = Algra et al. (1996), 115–34
de Rijk, L. M. 2002, Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology, Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
de Rijk, L. M. and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (eds.) 1987, Logos and Pragma: Essays on the Philosophy of Language in Honour of Professor Gabriel Nuchelmans, Nijmegen
Detel, W. 1998, ‘Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and the Path to the Principles’ = Avgelis/Peonidis (1998), 155–81
Devereux, D. T. 1992, ‘Inherence and Primary Substance in Aristotle's Categories’, AP 12: 113–31Google Scholar
Diamond, C. and Teichmann, J. (eds.) 1979, Intention and Intentionality: Essays in Honour of G. E. M. Anscombe, Ithaca
Dickason, A. 1976, ‘Aristotle, the Sea Fight, and the Cloud’, JHP 14: 11–22Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1883, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ⅰ, 7th edn, Stuttgart and Göttingen 1959
Dod, B. G. (ed.) 1975, Aristoteles, de Sophisticis Elenchis, trans. by Boethius, James of Venice, and William of Moerbeke, Leiden and Brussels
Donini, P. L. 1989, Ethos. Aristotele e il determinismo, Alessandria
Döring, A. 1890, ‘Die aristotelischen Definitionen von σύνδ∊σμος und ἄρθρον, Poetik c. 20’, AGPh 3: 363–9Google Scholar
Döring, K. 1972, Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien, Amsterdam
Döring, K. and Ebert, T. (eds.) 1993, Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, Stuttgart
Dorion, L.-A. (trans. and comm.) 1995, Aristote, Les réfutations sophistiques, Paris
DuLac, H. 1949, ‘The Peri Hermeneias: Its Place in Logic and Its Order’, Laval théologique et philosophique 5: 161–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duminil, M.-P. and Jaulin, A. (trans. and comm.) 1991, Aristote, Metaphysiques. Livre Delta, Toulouse
Düring, I. 1961, Aristotle's Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction, Stockholm, Göteborg, and Uppsala
Düring, I. 1966, Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Heidelberg
Düring, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.) 1960, Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century: Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum Held at Oxford in August 1957, Göteborg
Du Val, G. (ed. and comm.) 1629, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Quae Exstant Graece et Latine …, Paris
Ebbesen, S. 1981, Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi, Leiden
Ebbesen, S. 1986, ‘The Chimera's Diary’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 115–42
Edel, A. 1982, Aristotle and His Philosophy, Chapel Hill, NC
Edwards, P. (ed.) 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York and London
Enders, M. 1999, Wahrheit und Notwendigkeit. Die Theorie der Wahrheit bei Anselm von Canterbury im Gesamtzusammenhang seines Denkens und unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner antiken Quellen (Aristoteles, Cicero, Augustinus, Boethius), Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
Engel, P. 2002, Truth, Chesham
Engelhardt, P. M. 1953, Die Wahrheit in der Einheit und Entzweiung, diss. (Univ. of Freiburg i. Br.)
Engmann, J. 1976, ‘Imagination and Truth in Aristotle’, JHP 14: 259–65Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1979, ‘Does Tense Logic Rest upon a Mistake?’ = Evans (1985), 343–63
Evans, G. 1985, Collected Papers, Oxford
Everson, S. (ed.) 1994, Language, Cambridge
Everson, S. 1995, ‘Proper Sensibles and αθ ὑτά Causes’, Phronesis 40: 265–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everson, S. 1997, Aristotle on Perception, Oxford
Fait, P. 1996, ‘Il linguaggio e l’abaco (Aristotele, Soph. El. 1, 165a6–17)’ = Funghi (1996), 181–90
Fait, P. 1998, ‘L’éristique mise en formules’, Dialogue 37: 131–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattal, M. 1996, ‘L’intellection des indivisibles dans le De anima (ⅲ, 6) d’Aristote. Lectures arabes et modernes’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 423–40
Faust, A. 1931/32, Der Möglichkeitsgedanke. Systemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen, repr., New York and London 1987
Field, H. 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’, JP 69: 347–75Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1980, ‘The One over Many’, PR 89: 197–240Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1984a, ‘Truth and Necessity in De Interpretatione 9’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 1: 23–47Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1984b, ‘Separation’, OSAP 2: 31–87Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1985, ‘Separation: A Reply to Morrison’, OSAP 3: 159–65Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1993, On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms, Oxford
Fiorentino, F. 2001, ‘Il problema della verità in Aristotele’, Sapienza 54: 257–302Google Scholar
Fleischer, M. 1984, Wahrheit und Wahrheitsgrund: Zum Wahrheitsproblem und zu seiner Geschichte, Berlin and New York
Fonseca, P. 1577/89, Commentarii in Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae Libros, rev. edn, Cologne 1615/24, repr., Hildesheim 1964
Förster, A. (ed.) 1912, Aristotelis de Anima Libri III, Budapest
Forster, E. S. and Furley, D. J. (eds. and trans.) 1955, Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away, On the Cosmos, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., Sharples, R. W., and Gutas, D. (eds. and trans.) 1993, Theophrastus of Eresus, Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Fox, J. F. 1987, ‘Truthmaker’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, K. 2002, ‘Demonstrative Science and the Science of Being qua Being’, OSAP 22: 43–82Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1970, Aristoteles und die ‘Seeschlacht’. Das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9, Göttingen
Frede, D. 1972, ‘Omne quod est quando est necesse est esse’, AGPh 54: 153–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D. 1985, ‘The Sea-Battle Reconsidered: A Defence of the Traditional Interpretation’, OSAP 3: 31–87Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1990, ‘Fatalism and Future Truth’, BACAP 6: 195–227Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1998, ‘Logik, Sprache und die Offenheit der Zukunft in der Antike: Bemerkungen zu zwei neuen Forschungsbeiträgen’, ZPhF 52: 84–104Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1967, Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von ‘… ist …’ und ‘… ist nicht …’ im Sophistes, Göttingen
Frede, M. 1978, ‘Individuals in Aristotle’ = M. Frede (1987), 49–71, 367
Frede, M. 1981, ‘Categories in Aristotle’ = M. Frede (1987), 29–48, 367
Frede, M. 1987, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford
Frede, M. and Patzig, G. 1988, Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Munich
Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) 1996, Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford
Freese, J. H. (ed. and trans.) 1926, Aristotle, The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric, London and New York
Freeland, C. 1992, ‘Aristotle on the Sense of Touch’ = Nussbaum/Oksenberg Rorty (1992/95), 227–48
Frege, G. 1918/19, ‘Die Verneinung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 143–57Google Scholar
Funghi, M. S. (ed.) 1996, ΟΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ–Le vie della ricerca. Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno, Florence
Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.) 1983/89, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster
Gagnebin, C. (ed.) 1981, Métaphysique, histoire de la philosophie. Recueil d’études offert à F. Brunner, Neuchâtel
Gale, R. M. 1961, ‘Endorsing Predictions’, PR 70: 376–85Google Scholar
Gale, R. M. (ed.) 1968, The Philosophy of Time: A Collection of Essays, London and Melbourne
Gallavotti, C. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, Dell’arte poetica, n.p.
Galluzzo, G. 1997/98, Il concetto di verità nei primi scritti di S. Agostino, diss. (University of Pisa)
Galluzzo, G. 2000, ‘Il tema della verità dell’Expositio Libri Peryermenias di Tommaso d’Aquino’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11: 217–57Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1994, ‘Fatalism, Foreknowledge and the Reality of the Future’, The Modern Schoolman 81: 83–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1995, The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future, Berlin and New York
Gaskin, R. 1996, ‘Sea Battles, Worn-out Cloaks, and Other Matters of Interpretation: Weidemann on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias’, AGPh 78: 48–59Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1998, ‘Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on In Cat. 396, 30–397, 28’, Phronesis 43: 42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. (trans. and comm.) 2000, Simplicius, On Aristotle Categories 9–15, London
Geach, P. T. 1963, ‘Aristotle on Conjunctive Propositions’ = Geach (1972), 13–27
Geach, P. T. 1968, ‘History of the Corruptions of Logic’ = Geach (1972), 44–61
Geach, P. T. 1972, Logic Matters, repr., Berkeley and Los Angeles 1980
Geyser, G. J. A. M. 1917, Die Erkenntnistheorie des Aristoteles, repr., Aalen 1980
Gigon, O. and Fischer, M. W. (eds.) 1988, Antike Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt a. M., Bern, New York, and Paris
Gobbo, E. 1997, ‘La concezione “diretta” dell’ ἔλ∊γχος negli Analitici primi e nelle Confutazioni sofistiche’, Elenchos 18: 311–57Google Scholar
Gohlke, P. (trans. and comm.) 1951, Aristoteles, Kategorien und Hermeneutik, Paderborn
Gohlke, P. (trans. and comm.) 1961, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, 2nd edn, Paderborn
Goldin, O. 1996, Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1–10, Ann Arbor
Goldin, O. 2002, ‘To Tell the Truth: Dissoi Logoi 4 and Aristotle's Responses’ = Caston/Graham (2002), 233–49
Gómez-Lobo, A. 1980, ‘The So-Called Question of Existence in Aristotle, An. Post. 2. 1–2’, RM 34: 71–89Google Scholar
Goodwin, W. W. 1889, Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, repr., Bristol 1998
Gourinat, J.-B. 2000, La dialectique des stoïciens, Paris
Graeser, A. 1977, ‘On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’, Dialectica 31: 359–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeser, A. 1978, ‘Sprache und Ontologie bei Aristoteles’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 25: 443–55Google Scholar
Graeser, A. 1981, ‘Aristotle and Aquinas on Being as Being True’ = Gagnebin (1981), 85–97
Graeser, A. 1983a, ‘Aspekte der Ontologie in der Kategorienschrift’ = Moraux/Wiesner (1983), 30–56
Graeser, A. 1983b, Die Philosophie der Antike 2: Sophistik und Sokratik, Plato und Aristoteles, Munich
Graeser, A. (ed. and comm.) 1973, Die logischen Fragmente des Theophrast, Berlin and New York
Graham, D. W. 1987, Aristotle's Two Systems, Oxford
Grant, C. K. 1957, ‘Certainty, Necessity and Aristotle's Sea Battle’, Mind 66: 522–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayeff, F. 1974, Aristotle and His School: An Inquiry into the History of the Peripatos with a Commentary on Metaphysics Ζ, Η, Λ and Δ, London
Grice, P. 1988, ‘Aristotle on the Multiplicity of Being’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 175–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossato, A. 1999, ‘La critica del capitolo 9 del De interpretatione di Aristotele mediante la logica formale moderna’ = Zadro (1999), 397–443
Grote, G. 1880, Aristotle, ed. by A. Bain and G. C. Robertson, 2nd edn, London
Gudeman, A. (ed. and comm.) 1934, Aristoteles, ΠΗΡ Ι ΠΟΙΗ ΤΙ ΚΗΣ, Berlin
Guetti, C. and Pujia, R. (eds.) 1996, Atti del convegno ‘Momenti di Storia della Logica e di Storia della Filosofia’, Roma, 9–11 novembre 1994, Rome
Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) 1997, Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullman, Stuttgart
Haack, S. 1974/96, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, 2nd edn, Chicago and London
Hadot, P. 1980, ‘Sur divers sens du mot pragma dans la tradition philosophique grecque’ = Aubenque (1980), 309–19
Hafemann, B. 1998, Aristoteles’ Transzendentaler Realismus. Inhalt und Umfang erster Prinzipien in der ‘Metaphysik’, Berlin and New York
Hafemann, B. 1999, ‘Indefinite Aussagen und das kontingent Zukünftige: Akzidenzien allgemeiner Gegenstände und graduelle Wahrheit in AristotelesDe Interpretatione 7 und 9’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 2: 109–37Google Scholar
Hallett, G. L. 1988, Language and Truth, New Haven and London
Halper, E. C. 1989, One and Many in Aristotle's Metaphysics: The Central Books, Columbus, Ohio
Hamblin, C. L. 1970, Fallacies, London
Hamlyn, D. W. 1962, ‘The Correspondence Theory of Truth’, PQ 12: 193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (trans. and comm.) 1968/93, Aristotle, De Anima: Books II and III (with Passages from Book I), 2nd edn (with contributions by C. Shields), Oxford
Harris, L. D. 1977/78, ‘Solving the “Naval Battle”’, PAS n.s., 78: 45–61Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. 1965, ‘The Meaning of “Is Going to Be”’, Mind 74: 46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. J. 1975, Aristotle on Truth with Respect to Incomposites, diss. (University of Michigan)
Harvey, P. J. 1978, ‘Aristotle on Truth and Falsity in De Anima 3. 6’, JHP 16: 219–20Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1924/25, Platon. Sophistes, ed. by I. Schüssler, Frankfurt a. M. 1992
Heidegger, M. 1925/26, Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, ed. by W. Biemel, 2nd edn, Frankfurt a. M. 1995
Heidegger, M. 1926, Die Grundbegriffe der antiken Philosophie, ed. by F.-K. Bust, Frankfurt a. M. 1993
Heidegger, M. 1927, Sein und Zeit, 10th edn, Tübingen 1963
Heidegger, M. 1930, Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie, ed. by H. Tietjen, Frankfurt a. M. 1982
Heidegger, M. 1930/31, ‘Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit’ = Heidegger (1967), 109–44
Heidegger, M. 1946, ‘Brief über den “Humanismus”’ = Heidegger (1967), 145–94
Heidegger, M. 1967, Wegmarken, Frankfurt a. M
Heinaman, R. 1981, ‘Non-substantial Individuals in the Categories’, Phronesis 26: 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, P., Kallen, H. M., and Langer, S. K. (eds.) 1951, Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Henry M. Sheffer, New York
Hennigfeld, J. 1994, Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Antike und Mittelalter, Berlin and New York
Herbertz, R. 1913, Das Wahrheitsproblem in der griechischen Philosophie, Berlin
Hicks, R. D. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1907, Aristotle, De Anima, Cambridge
Hildebrand, H. 1884, Aristoteles’ Stellung zum Determinismus und Indeterminismus, diss. (University of Leipzig)
Hintikka, J. 1957, ‘Necessity, Universality and Time in Aristotle’, Ajatus 20: 65–90Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1964/73a, ‘The Once and Future Sea Fight: Aristotle's Discussion of Future Contingents in De Interpretatione IX’ = Hintikka (1973), 147–78
Hintikka, J. 1964/73b, ‘Aristotle and the “Master Argument” of Diodorus’ = Hintikka (1973), 179–213
Hintikka, J. 1967/73, ‘Time, Truth, and Knowledge in Aristotle and Other Greek Philosophers’ = Hintikka (1973), 62–92
Hintikka, J. 1973, Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality, Oxford
Hintikka, J. 1986, ‘The Varieties of Being in Aristotle’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 81–114
Hintikka, J. 1999, ‘On Aristotle's Notion of Existence’, RM 52: 779–805Google Scholar
Hintikka, J., Remes, U., and Knuuttila, S. 1977, Aristotle on Modality and Determinism, Amsterdam
Hitchcock, D. 2000, ‘Fallacies and Formal Logic in Aristotle’, HPL 21: 207–21Google Scholar
Hiz, H. (ed.) 1978, Questions, Dordrecht
Hope, R. (trans.) 1952, Aristotle, Metaphysics, repr., Ann Arbor, Mich. 1994
Horn, H.-J. 1994, Studien zum dritten Buch der aristotelischen Schrift De anima, Göttingen
HPL = History and Philosophy of Logic
Hughes, R. I. G. (ed.) 1993, A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
Humbert, J. 1945/60, Syntaxe grecque, 3rd edn, Paris
Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) 1999, Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford
Ihrig, A. H. 1965, ‘Remarks on Logical Necessity and Future Contingencies’, Mind 74: 215–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inciarte, F. 1999, ‘Aristotle and Aquinas: The Principle of Excluded Middle’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 2: 139–48Google Scholar
Irmscher, J. and Müller, R. (eds.) 1983, Aristoteles als Wissenschaftstheoretiker, Berlin
Irwin, T. H. 1977, Plato's Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford
Irwin, T. H. 1982, ‘Aristotle's Concept of Signification’ = Schofield/Craven Nussbaum (1982), 241–66
Irwin, T. H. 1988, Aristotle's First Principles, Oxford
Isnardi Parente, M. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1980, Speusippo, Frammenti, Naples
Jacobs, W. 1979, ‘Aristotle and Non-Referring Subjects’, Phronesis 24: 282–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, W. 1980, ‘The Existential Presuppositions of Aristotle's Logic’, Philosophical Studies 37: 419–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, W. W. 1911, ‘Emendationum aristotelearum specimen’ = Jaeger (1960), 1–38
Jaeger, W. W. 1912, Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles, Berlin
Jaeger, W. W. 1923, Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung, Berlin
Jaeger, W. W. 1960, Scripta minora, ⅰ, Rome
Jaeger, W. W. (ed.) 1957, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Oxford
Jeffrey, R. C. 1979, ‘Coming True’ = Diamond/Teichmann (1979), 251–60
JHP = Journal of the History of Philosophy
Joachim, H. H. 1906, The Nature of Truth, Oxford
Joachim, H. H. 1948, Logical Studies, Oxford
Joachim, H. H. (ed. and comm.) 1926, Aristotle, On Coming-to-Be & Passing-Away, Oxford
Jordan, Z. 1963, ‘Logical Determinism’, NDJFL 4: 1–38Google Scholar
JP = The Journal of Philosophy
JSL = The Journal of Symbolic Logic
Judson, L. 1988, ‘La bataille navale d’aujourd’hui: De Interpretatione 9’, RPA 6: 5–37Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1966, ‘The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being’, Foundations of Language 2: 245–65Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1973a, The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht and Boston
Kahn, C. H. 1973b, ‘On the Terminology for Copula and Existence’ = Stern/Hourani/Brown (1973), 141–58
Kahn, C. H. 1973c, ‘On the Theory of the Verb “To Be”’ = Munitz (1973), 1–20
Kahn, C. H. 1976, ‘Why Existence does not Emerge as a Distinct Concept in Greek Philosophy’, AGPh 58: 323–34Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1978, ‘Questions and Categories: Aristotle's Doctrine of Categories in the Light of Modern Research’ = Hiz (1978), 227–78
Kahn, C. H. 1985, ‘On the Intended Interpretation of Aristotle's Metaphysics’ = Wiesner (1985), 311–38
Kal, V. 1988, On Intuition and Discursive Reasoning in Aristotle, Leiden, New York, Copenhagen, and Cologne
Kapp, E. 1942, Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic, New York
Keeler, L. 1932, ‘Aristotle on the Problem of Error’, Gregorianum 13: 241–60Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (trans. and comm.) 1991, Aristotle, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, New York and Oxford
Kenny, A. 1967, ‘The Argument from Illusion in Aristotle's Metaphysics (Γ, 1009–10)’, Mind 76: 184–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M. 1976, Aristoteles’ Lehre von der Einheit der Definition, Munich
Ketchum, R. J. 1998, ‘Being and Existence in Greek Ontology’, AGPh 80: 321–32Google Scholar
King-Farlow, J. 1958/59, ‘Sea-Fights without Tears’, Analysis 19: 36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, R. L. 1992, Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Kirwan, C. 1986, ‘Aristotle on the Necessity of the Present’, OSAP 4: 167–87Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. (trans. and comm.) 1971/93, Aristotle, Metaphysics: Books Γ, Δ, and Ε, 2nd edn, Oxford
Knabenschuh de Porta, S. 1997, ‘Über die Contingentia Futura und ihre epistemologischen Implikationen’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 189–240
Kneale, M. 1974, rev. of Hintikka (1973), PQ 24: 369–70CrossRef
Kneale, W. C. and Kneale, M. 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford
Kneepkens, C. H. 1994, ‘From Eternal to Perpetual Truths: A Note on the Mediaeval History of Aristotle, De interpretatione, Ch. 1, 16a18’, Vivarium 32: 161–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, S. 1993, Modalities in Medieval Philosophy, London and New York
Knuuttila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.) 1986, The Logic of Being: Historical Studies, Dordrecht
Kraus, O. 1930, introduction and notes to Brentano (1930)
Kreiser, L. 1983, ‘Aristotelischer und Nicht-Aristotelischer Wahrheitsbegriff’ = Irmscher/Müller (1983), 96–9
Krell, D. F. 1975, ‘On the Manifold Meaning of Aletheia: Brentano, Aristotle, Heidegger’, Research in Phenomenology 5: 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1998, ‘Boethius and the Truth about Tomorrow's Sea Battle’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 24–52
Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J. (eds.) 1982, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge
Kullmann, W. 1994/95, ‘Einige Gedanken zur Entwicklung deterministischer Lehren bei den Griechen und zu Aristoteles, De interpretatione 9’, Wiener Studien 107/108: 291–306Google Scholar
Landman, F. 1991, Structures for Semantics, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Lang, P. 1911, De Speusippi Academici scriptis, repr., Hildesheim 1965
Larkin, M. T. 1971, Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle, The Hague and Paris
Lask, E. 1912, Die Lehre vom Urteil = Lask (1923), 283–463
Lask, E. 1923, Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by E. Herrigel, ⅱ, Tübingen
Leal Carretero, F. M. 1983, Der aristotelische Wahrheitsbegriff und die Aufgabe der Semantik, diss. (University of Cologne)
Ledda, G. 1990, ‘Verità e poesia nella Poetica di Aristotele’, Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia – Università di Firenze 6: 3–57Google Scholar
Lemmon, E. J. 1956, rev. of Anscombe (1956/68), JSL 21: 388–9
Lenz, J. W. 1957, ‘Looking Back at the “Sea Fight Tomorrow”’, JP 54: 773–4Google Scholar
León, J. C. 1996, ‘Indeterminism and Future Contingency in Non-Classical Logics’ = Angelelli/Cerezo (1996), 383–95
Leszl, W. 1970, Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle: Aristotle's Treatment of Types of Equivocity and Its Relevance to His Metaphysical Theories, Padua
Leszl, W. 1971, ‘Metodi di analisi nella filosofia di Aristotele’, Rivista di filosofia 62: 325–53Google Scholar
Leszl, W. 1975, Aristotle's Conception of Ontology, Padua
Lewinsohn, W. 1911, ‘Zur Lehre von Urteil und Verneinung bei Aristoteles’, AGPh 24: 197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, F. A. 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge
Linke, P. F. 1924, ‘Die Existentialtheorie der Wahrheit und der Psychologismus der Geltungslogik’, Kant-Studien 29: 395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, P. F. 1965, ‘Die Unhaltbarkeit des aristotelischen Wahrheitsbegriffs – und die Folgen’, ZPhF 19: 306–19Google Scholar
Linsky, L. 1954, ‘Professor Donald Williams on Aristotle’, PR 63: 250–2Google Scholar
Liske, M.-T. 1985, Aristoteles und der aristotelische Essentialismus: Individuum, Art, Gattung, Freiburg and Munich
Liske, M.-T. 1988, ‘Das veritative “ist” und der logische Atomismus in Platons Theaitetos’, AGPh 70: 147–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liske, M.-T. 1995, ‘In welcher Weise hängen Modalbegriffe und Zeitbegriffe bei Aristoteles zusammen?’, ZPhF 49: 351–77Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. 1981, Form and Universal in Aristotle, Liverpool
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.) 1978, Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge
Long, A. A. 1981, ‘Aristotle and the History of Greek Scepticism’ = O’Meara (1981), 79–106
Loux, M. J. 1991, Primary Ousia: An Essay on Aristotle's Metaphysics Ζ and H, Ithaca and London
Lowe, M. F. 1980, ‘Aristotle on the Sea-Battle: A Clarification’, Analysis 40: 55–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSJ = Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S., A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edn with a revised supplement, Oxford 1996
Lucas, J. R. 1989, The Future: An Essay on God, Temporality, and Truth, Oxford
Lugarini, L. 1955, ‘Il problema delle categorie in Aristotele’, Acme 8: 3–107Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. 1910a, Über den Satz des Widerspruchs bei Aristoteles, trans. by J. Barski, Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York 1993
Lukasiewicz, J. 1910b, ‘Über den Satz des Widerspruchs bei Aristoteles’, Bulletin international de l’Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe de Philosophie et d’Histoire n.n.: 15–38
Lukasiewicz, J. 1918, ‘On Three-Valued Logic’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 87–8
Lukasiewicz, J. 1922, ‘On Determinism’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 110–28
Lukasiewicz, J. 1930, ‘Philosophical Remarks on Many-Valued Systems of Propositional Logic’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 153–78
Lukasiewicz, J. 1957, Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford
Lukasiewicz, J. 1970, Selected Works, ed. by L. Borkowski, Amsterdam, London, and Warsaw
Luther, W. 1966, ‘Wahrheit, Licht und Erkenntnis in der griechischen Philosophie bis Demokrit. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung des Zusammenhangs von Sprache und philosophischem Denken’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 10: 1–240Google Scholar
Magris, A. 1977, ‘Aristotele e i Megarici. Contributo alla storia del determinismo antico’, Atti dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 111: 113–33Google Scholar
Maier, H. 1896/1936, Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1969
Maier, H. 1899, ‘Die Echtheit der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik’, AGPh 13: 23–72Google Scholar
Manetti, G. (ed.) 1996, Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, Brussels
Mann, J. A. 1958, Existential Import and the Aristotelian Syllogistic, Washington, D.C.
Mansion, A. 1913/45, Introduction à la physique aristotélicienne, 2nd edn, Louvain
Mansion, S. 1946/76, Le jugement d’existence chez Aristote, 2nd edn, Louvain
Mansion, S. (ed.) 1961, Aristote et les problèmes de méthode. Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au 1erseptembre 1960, Louvain and Paris
Margoliouth, D. S. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1911, The Poetics of Aristotle, London
Marrone, L. 1988, ‘Il Mentitore nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni logiche di Crisippo)’ = AA. VV. (1988), 271–6
Marrone, L. 1997, ‘Le Questioni logiche di Crisippo (PHerc 307)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 27: 83–100Google Scholar
Marx, W. 1977, Introduction to Aristotle's Theory of Being as Being, trans. by R. M. Schine, The Hague
Mates, B. 1953/61, Stoic Logic, 2nd edn, Berkeley and Los Angeles
Mattéi, J.-F. (ed.) 1990, La naissance de la raison en Grèce (Actes du Congrès de Nice, mai 1987), Paris
Matthen, M. 1983, ‘Greek Ontology and the “Is” of Truth’, Phronesis 28: 113–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. 1984, ‘Aristotle's Semantics and a Puzzle Concerning Change’ = Pelletier/King-Farlow (1984), 21–40
Matthews, G. B. 1995, ‘Aristotle on Existence’, BICS 42: 233–8Google Scholar
Maurus, S. (trans. and comm.) 1668, Aristotelis Opera quae Extant Omnia …, repr., Paris 1885–86
Mayo, B. 1962/68, ‘The Open Future’ = Gale (1968), 275–91
McArthur, R. P. 1976, Tense Logic, Dordrecht and Boston
McCall, S. 1966, ‘Temporal Flux’, American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 270–81Google Scholar
McGee, V. 1991, Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
McKim, V. R. 1971/72, ‘Fatalism and the Future: Aristotle's Way Out’, RM 25: 80–111Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D., Jr 1992, Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton
Melchiorre, V. (ed.) 2000, I luoghi del comprendere, Milan
Merlan, P. 1953, From Platonism to Neoplatonism, The Hague
Michelis, D. F. 1886, Aristotelis π∊ρὶ νΗρμην∊ίας Librum pro Restituendo Totius Philosophiae Fundamento …, Heidelberg
Mignucci, M. 1975a, L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Commento agli Analitici secondi, Padua
Mignucci, M. 1975b, ‘In margine al concetto aristotelico di esistenza’ = AA. VV. (1975), 227–61
Mignucci, M. 1985a, ‘Temporalità e verità nella filosofia greca’ = AA. VV. (1985), 163–91
Mignucci, M. 1985b, ‘Logic and Omniscience: Alexander of Aphrodisias and Proclus’, OSAP 3: 219–46Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1986, ‘Aristotle's Definitions of Relatives in Cat. 7’, Phronesis 31: 101–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1989, ‘Truth and Modality in Late Antiquity: Boethius on Future Contingent Propositions’ = Corsi/Mangione/Mugnai (1989), 47–78
Mignucci, M. 1994, ‘Truth and Thought in the De anima’ = Alberti (1994), 137–55
Mignucci, M. 1996a, ‘Vérité et pensée dans le De anima’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 405–22
Mignucci, M. 1996b, ‘Ammonius on Future Contingent Propositions’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 279–310
Mignucci, M. 1997a, ‘Logica’ = Berti (1997), 47–101
Mignucci, M. 1997b, ‘Remarks on Aristotle's Theory of Predication’ = Günther/Rengakos (1997), 135–51
Mignucci, M. 1998, ‘Ammonius’ Sea Battle’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 53–86
Mignucci, M. 1999a, ‘La critica di Teofrasto alla logica aristotelica’ = Natali/Maso (1999), 21–39
Mignucci, M. 1999b, ‘The Liar Paradox and the Stoics’ = Ierodiakonou (1999), 54–70
Mignucci, M. (trans. and comm.) 1969, Aristotele, Gli Analitici Primi, Naples
Miller, F. D., Jr 1971, Aristotle's Account of Being and Truth, diss. (University of Washington)
Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.) 1949, Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, Oxford
Modrak, D. K. W. 1987, Aristotle: The Power of Perception, Chicago and London
Modrak, D. K. W. 2001, Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning, Cambridge
Moline, J. 1969, ‘Aristotle, Eubulides and the Sorites’, Mind 78: 393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, E. 1984/88, La sezione linguistica del Peri Hermeneias di Aristotele, Florence
Montoneri, M. 1984, I Megarici. Studio storico-critico e traduzione delle testimonianze antiche, Catania
Moore, G. E. 1953, Some Main Problems of Philosophy, London
Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J. (eds.) 1983, Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum: Studien zu einigen Dubia – Akten des 9. Symposium Aristotelicum (Berlin, 7.–16. September 1981), Berlin and New York
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.) 1968, Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, London and Melbourne
Moreau, J. 1961, ‘Aristote et la vérité antéprédicative’ = S. Mansion (1961), 21–33
Morgenstern, A. 2001, ‘Commentary on Crivelli’, BACAP 17: 270–84Google Scholar
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. 1967, Linguistica e stilistica di Aristotele, Rome
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. 1971, ‘Asserzione ed esistenza nella logica di Aristotele’, Filosofia 22: 29–60Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 1985, ‘Separation in Aristotle's Metaphysics’, OSAP 3: 125–57Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 1987, ‘The Evidence for Degrees of Being in Aristotle’, Classical Quarterly 37: 382–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. 1992, ‘The Taxonomical Interpretation of Aristotle's Categories: A Criticism’ = Preus/Anton (1992), 19–46
Movia, G. (trans. and comm.) 1979, Aristotele, L’anima, Naples
Movia, G. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Aristotele, L’anima, Milan
Muckle, J. T. 1933, ‘Isaac Israeli's Definition of Truth’, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Litteraire du Moyen-Age 8: 5–8Google Scholar
Mugler, C. (ed. and trans.) 1966, Aristote, De la génération et de la corruption, Paris
Mulder, D. H. 1996, ‘The Existential Assumptions of Traditional Logic’, HPL 17: 141–54Google Scholar
Munitz, M. K. (ed.) 1973, Logic and Ontology, New York
Natali, C. and Maso, S. (eds.) 1999, Antiaristotelismo, Amsterdam
Natorp, P. 1888, ‘Ueber Aristoteles’ Metaphysik K 1–8, 1065a26’, AGPh 1: 178–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NDJFL = Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
Neale, S. 2001, Facing Facts, Oxford
Negro, G. 1996/97, ‘Alcune note sul vero in Aristotele. L’ ἀλήθ∊ια come isomorfismo di essere e conoscere’, Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti – Classe di Scienze Morali, Lettere ed Arti 155: 335–57Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. 1973, Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam and London
Nussbaum, M. C. and Oksenberg Rorty, A. (eds.) 1992/95, Essays on Aristotle's De anima, 2nd edn, Oxford
Brien, D. 1978, ‘Aristote et la catégorie de quantité: divisions de la quantité’, Les études philosophiques n.n.: 25–40Google Scholar
Oehler, K. 1962/85, Die Lehre vom noetischen und dianoetischen Denken bei Platon und Aristoteles. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Geschichte des Bewusstseinsproblems in der Antike, 2nd edn, Hamburg
Oehler, K. (trans. and comm.) 1984, Aristoteles, Kategorien, Darmstadt
Öffenberger, N. and Vigo, A. G. (eds.) 1997, Südamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik, Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York
O’Meara, D. J. (ed.) 1981, Studies in Aristotle, Washington D.C.
OSAP = Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy
Owen, G. E. L. 1960, ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’ = Düring/Owen (1960), 163–90
Owen, G. E. L. 1965, ‘Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology’ = Bambrough (1965), 69–95
Owen, G. E. L. 1966, ‘The Platonism of Aristotle’, Proceedings of the British Academy 51: 125–50Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1968a, ‘Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms’ = G. E. L. Owen (1968b), 103–25
Owen, G. E. L. 1978/79, ‘Particular and General’, PAS n.s., 79: 1–21Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (ed.) 1968b, Aristotle on Dialectic: the Topics – Papers of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford
Owen, O. F. (trans. and comm.) 1899/1900, Aristotle, The Organon or Logical Treatises, London
Owens, J. 1951/78, The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian ‘Metaphysics’: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, 3rd edn, Toronto
Pacius, J. 1597a, In Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Organum Commentarius Analyticus, repr., Hildesheim 1966
Pacius, J. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1597b, Aristotelis … Organum …, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1967
Pacius, J. 1611, Aristotelis de Anima …, Hannover
Pacius, J. 1623, Aristotelis … Organum …, repr., Frankfurt a. M. 1967
Pagliaro, A. 1954, ‘Il capitolo linguistico della “Poetica” di Aristotele’ = Pagliaro (1956/63), 77–151
Pagliaro, A. 1956/63, Nuovi saggi di critica semantica, 2nd edn, Messina and Florence
Pardey, U. 2000, ‘Verneinen als Absprechen bei Aristoteles oder: Muss man Aristoteles durch die Russellsche Brille lesen?’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 5: 17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAS = Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Patrizi, F. (trans.) 1583, Pseudo-Johannis Philoponi Expositiones in Omnes XIV Aristotelis Libros Metaphysicos, repr., with an intr. by C. Lohr, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt 1991
Patterson, R. 1995, Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne
Patzig, G. 1968, Aristotle's Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philosophical Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics, English ed., trans. by J. Barnes, Dordrecht
Patzig, G. 1973, ‘Aristotle, Lukasiewicz and the Origins of Many-Valued Logic’ = Suppes et al. (1973), 921–9
Pelletier, F. J. and King-Farlow, J. (eds.) 1984, New Essays on Aristotle, Calgary
Percival, P. 1993/94, ‘Absolute Truth’, PAS n.s., 94: 189–213Google Scholar
Pirotta, A. M. (ed.) 1925, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Aristotelis Librum De Anima Commentarium, Turin
Popper, K. R. 1934/59/75, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, English trans., 8th impression, London
Pozzi, L. 1974, Studi di logica antica e medievale, Padua
PQ = The Philosophical Quarterly
PR = The Philosophical Review
Prantl, C. 1855, Geschichte der Logik im Abenlande, ⅰ, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 1997
Preus, A. and Anton, J. P. (eds.) 1992, Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ⅴ, Albany
Prior, A. N. 1953, ‘Three-Valued Logic and Future Contingents’, PQ 3: 317–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. N. 1955/62, Formal Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1957, Time and Modality, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1967a, Past, Present and Future, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1967b, ‘Correspondence Theory of Truth’ = Edwards (1967), II 223–32
Prior, A. N. 1967c, ‘Logic, Many-Valued’ = Edwards (1967), V 1–5
Pritzl, K. 1984, ‘The Cognition of Indivisibles and the Argument of De Anima 3.4–8’, ACPA 58: 140–50Google Scholar
Pritzl, K. 1993, ‘Ways of Truth and Ways of Opinion in Aristotle’, ACPA 67: 241–52Google Scholar
Pritzl, K. 1998, ‘Being True in Aristotle's Thinking’, BACAP 14: 177–201, 212Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953, ‘On a Supposed Antinomy’ = Quine (1976), 19–21
Quine, W. V. 1976, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd edn, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Quine, W. V. 1986, Philosophy of Logic, 2nd edn, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Ranulf, S. 1924, Der eleatische Satz vom Widerspruch, Copenhagen, Christiania, London, and Berlin
Reale, G. 1961/67, Il concetto di filosofia prima e l’unità della Metafisica di Aristotele, 3rd edn, Milan
Reale, G. (trans. and comm.) 1968/93, Aristotele, Metafisica, 2nd edn, Milan
Rees, D. A. 1960, ‘Language, Logic and Reality in Aristotle and Russell’ = AA. VV. (1960), 137–43
Régis, L.-M. 1935, L’opinion selon Aristote, Paris and Ottawa
Remes, U. 1977, ‘Aristotle's Sea-Fight Discussion against its Background in the Topics’, Ajatus 37: 41–7Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1963a, Studies in the History of Arabic Logic, Pittsburgh
Rescher, N. 1963b, ‘An Interpretation of Aristotle's Doctrine of Future Contingency and Excluded Middle’ = Rescher (1963a), 43–54
Rescher, N. 1968, ‘Truth and Necessity in Temporal Perspective’ = Gale (1968), 183–220
Ringbom, M. 1972, ‘Thoughts and Facts: An Aristotelian Problem’, Ajatus 34: 7–25Google Scholar
Riondato, E. 1957a, La teoria aristotelica dell’enunciazione, Padua
Riondato, E. (trans. and comm.) 1957b, Aristotele, De interpretatione, Padua
RM = The Review of Metaphysics
Rodier, G. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1900, Aristote, Traité de lâme, Paris
Roeper, G. 1852, ‘Zu Aristoteles de anima’, Philologus 7: 324, 768Google Scholar
Rolfes, E. (trans. and comm.) 1904/28, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, 3rd edn, Leipzig
Romeyer Dherbey, G. and Viano, C. (eds.) 1996, Corps et âme. Sur le De anima d’Aristote, Paris
Rose, L. E. 1968, Aristotle's Syllogistic, Springfield, Ill
Rosen, S. H. 1961, ‘Thought and Touch: A Note on Aristotle's De Anima’, Phronesis 6: 127–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1923, Aristotle, 6th edn, London and New York 1995
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1924, Aristotle, Metaphysics, repr., Oxford 1975
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1949, Aristotle, Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1956, Aristotelis de Anima, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1958, Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1961, Aristotle, De Anima, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (trans.) 1908, Aristotle, Metaphysica, Oxford
Rostagni, A. (ed. and comm.) 1927, La Poetica di Aristotele, Turin
RPA = Revue de Philosophie Ancienne
Russell, B. 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, repr., Oxford and New York 1991
Russo, A. (trans.) 1973/82, Aristotele, Metafisica, 2nd edn, Rome and Bari
Rüstow, A. 1910, Der Lügner. Theorie, Geschichte und Auflösung, repr., New York and London 1987
Sadun Bordoni, G. 1994, Linguaggio e realtà in Aristotele, Rome and Bari
Sainati, V. 1968, Storia dell’ ‘Organon’ aristotelico, ⅰ, Florence
Salmeri, G. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Aristotele, Discorsi sull’esistenza. Libri 7-8-9 della Metafisica, Cinisello Balsamo
Saunders, J. T. 1958, ‘A Sea Fight Tomorrow?’, PR 67: 367–78Google Scholar
Sayward, C. 1989, ‘Does the Law of Excluded Middle Require Bivalence?’, Erkenntnis 31: 129–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpat, G. 1950, Il discorso e le sue parti in Aristotele, Arona
Schiaparelli, A. 1999a, ‘L’ambiguità in Aristotele e in Galeno’ = Natali/Maso (1999), 143–66
Schiaparelli, A. 1999b, ‘L’influenza della Retorica di Aristotele in età imperiale. L’importanza di essere chiaramente ambigui’, Méthexis 12: 53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. G. 1966, ‘Alexander von Aphrodisias in einem altarmenischen Kategorien-Kommentar’, Philologus 110: 277–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1985, Die Ideenlehre des Aristoteles, ⅰ.ⅱ, Bonn
Schofield, M. and Craven Nussbaum, M. (eds.) 1982, Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, Cambridge
Scholz, H. 1959, Abriss der Geschichte der Logik, 2nd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Schuhl, P. M. 1960, Le dominateur et les possibles, Paris
Schulz, G. 1993, Veritas est Adaequatio Intellectus et Rei: Untersuchungen zur Wahrheitslehre des Thomas von Aquin und zur Kritik Kants an einem überlieferten Wahrheitsbegriff, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Schwegler, A. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1847/48, Aristoteles, Die Metaphysik, repr., Frankfurt a. M. 1968
Scott, T. K. (trans.) 1966, John Buridan, Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, New York
Scott, T. K. (ed.) 1977, J. Buridanus, Sophismata, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstat
Sedley, D. 1996, ‘Aristotle's de Interpretatione and Ancient Semantics’ = G. Manetti (1996), 87–108
Seel, G. 1982a, Die aristotelische Modaltheorie, Berlin and New York
Seel, G. 1982b, ‘Diodore domine-t-il-Aristote?’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 87: 293–313Google Scholar
Seel, G. 2001a, ‘Ammonius’ Semantics of the Assertoric Sentence’ = Seel (2001b), 213–33
Seel, G. (ed.) 2001b, Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary, and Essays, Berlin and New York
Seeskin, K. R. 1971, ‘Many-Valued Logic and Future Contingencies’, Logique et Analyse 14: 759–73Google Scholar
Segalerba, G. 2001, Note su Ousia, ⅰ, Pisa
Seidl, H. 1971, Der Begriff des Intellekts (νοῦς) bei Aristoteles im philosophischen Zusammenhang seiner Hauptschriften, Meisenheim am Glan
Seidl, H. (trans. and comm.) 1989/91, Aristoteles’ Metaphysik, 3rd edn, Hamburg
Sepich, J. R. 1953, ‘La noción de verdad en el libro IX capitulo 10 de la Metafisica de Aristóteles’ = AA. VV. (1953), ⅻ 107–8
Sharples, R. W. 1979, ‘“If What Is Earlier, then Of Necessity What Is Later”? Some Ancient Discussions of Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione 2.11’, BICS 26: 27–44Google Scholar
Shields, C. 1999, Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle, Oxford
Sillitti, G. 1966, ‘I “Fondamenti della logica aristotelica” e la critica di Emanuele Severino’ = Calogero (1927/68), 313–25
Sillitti, G. 1968, ‘Il non ente tra Platone e Aristotele’, La cultura 6: 474–88Google Scholar
Simons, P. 1987, Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford
Simons, P. 1988, ‘Aristotle's Concept of State of Affairs’ = Gigon/Fischer (1988), 97–112
Simpson, P. 1981, ‘Aristotle's Theory of Assertions: A Reply to William Jacobs’, Phronesis 26: 84–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siwek, P. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1965, Aristotelis Tractatus de Anima Graece et Latine, Rome
Skarica, M. 1997, ‘Anmerkungen zum Kommentar von Boethius zu De Interpretatione 9 von Aristoteles’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 182–8
Slomkowski, P. 1997, Aristotle's Topics, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Smith, R. (trans. and comm.) 1989, Aristotle, Prior Analytics, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
Smith, R. (trans. and comm.) 1997, Aristotle, Topics: Books I and VIII with Excerpts from Related Texts, Oxford
Sommers, F. 1969/70, ‘On Concepts of Truth in Natural Languages’, RM 23: 259–86Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980, Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory, London
Sorabji, R. 1981, ‘Definitions: Why Necessary, and in What Way?’ = Berti (1981), 205–44
Sorabji, R. 1982, ‘Myths about Non-Propositional Thought’ = Schofield/Craven Nussbaum (1982), 295–314
Sorabji, R. 1983, Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, London
Sorabji, R. 1988, Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel, London
Sorabji, R. 1992, ‘Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle's Theory of Sense-Perception’ = Nussbaum/Oksenberg Rorty (1992/95), 195–225
Sorabji, R. 1996, ‘Rationality’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 311–34
Sorabji, R. 1998, ‘The Three Deterministic Arguments Opposed by Ammonius’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 3–15
Soreth, M. 1973, ‘Zum infiniten Prädikat im zehnten Kapitel der aristotelischen Hermeneutik’ = Stern/Hourani/Brown (1973), 389–424
Spade, P. V. 1973, ‘The Origins of the Mediaeval Insolubilia Literature’, Franciscan Studies 33: 292–309Google Scholar
Spade, P. V. 1982, ‘Insolubilia’ = Kretzmann/Kenny/Pinborg (1982), 246–53
Spade, P. V. 1987, ‘Five Early Theories in the Mediaeval Insolubilia-Literature’, Vivarium 25: 24–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellman, L. 1980, ‘DI 9: An Exegetical Stalemate’, Apeiron 14: 115–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiazzi, R. M. (ed.) 1964, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Aristotelis Libros Peri Hermeneias et Posteriorum Analyticorum Expositio, 2nd edn, Turin
Srzednicki, J. 1965, Franz Brentano's Analysis of Truth, The Hague
Steinthal, H. 1863/90, Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 2001
Stenzel, J. 1931, Metaphysik des Altertums, Munich and Berlin
Stern, S. M., Hourani, A., and Brown, V. (eds.) 1973, Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented by His Friends and Pupils to Richard Walzer, Columbia, SC
Stough, C. L. 1972, ‘Language and Ontology in Aristotle's Categories’, JHP 10: 261–72Google Scholar
Strache, I. and Wallies, M. (eds.) 1923, Aristotelis Topica cum Libro de Sophisticis Elenchis, Leipzig
Strang, C. 1960, ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle’, Mind 69: 447–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950, ‘Truth’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 162–82
Strobach, N. 1998, ‘Logik für die Seeschlacht – mögliche Spielzüge’, ZPhF 52: 105–19Google Scholar
Suarez, F. 1597, Disputationes Metaphysicae, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 1998
Sugihara, T. 1954, rev. of Prior (1953), JSL 19: 294Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. 1970, ‘What Was True or False in the Old Logic?’, JP 67: 788–800Google Scholar
Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., and Moisil, G. C. (eds.) 1973, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Bucharest, 1971, Amsterdam, London, and New York
Szaif, J. 1998, Platons Begriff der Wahrheit, 3rd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Szaniawski, K. (ed.) 1989, The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Talanga, J. 1986, Zukunftsurteile und Fatum: Eine Untersuchung über Aristoteles’ De interpretatione 9 und Ciceros De fato, mit einem Überblick über die spätantiken Heimarmene-Lehren, Bonn
Tarski, A. 1933, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ = Tarski (1956/83), 152–278
Tarski, A. 1944, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 115–43
Tarski, A. 1956/83, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, trans. by J. H. Woodger, 2nd edn, ed. by J. Corcoran, Indianapolis, Ind
Tarski, A. 1969, ‘Truth and Proof’ = Hughes (1993), 101–25
Taylor, K. 1998, Truth and Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford
Taylor, R. 1957, ‘The Problem of Future Contingencies’, PR 66: 1–28Google Scholar
Textor, A. 1870, De Hermeniae Aristoteleae capitibus I–XI, diss., Berlin
Theiler, W. (trans. and comm.) 1959, Aristoteles, Über die Seele, Darmstadt
Thom, P. 1981, The Syllogism, Munich
Thom, P. 2002, ‘On the Pervasiveness of Being’ = Caston/Graham (2002), 293–301
Thomason, R. H. 1970, ‘Indeterminist Time and Truth-Value Gaps’, Theoria 36: 264–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, R. H. 1984, ‘Combinations of Tense and Modality’ = Gabbay/Guenthner (1983/89), II 135–65
Thompson, M. 1953/68, ‘On Aristotle's Square of Opposition’ = Moravcsik (1968), 51–72
Thornton, A. M. 1986, ‘Λόγος-phrase et λόγος-texte chez Platon et Aristote’ = AA. VV. (1986), 165–79
Thorp, J. 2001, ‘“Being in the Strictest Sense”: Aristotle on Truth, Reality and Existence’, unpublished typescript
Torstrik, A. (ed. and comm.) 1862, Aristotelis de Anima Libri III, Berlin
Tredennick, H. (ed. and trans.) 1933, Aristotle, The Metaphysics, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1836/92, Elementa Logices Aristoteleae, 9th edn, Berlin
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1846, Geschichte der Kategorienlehre, Berlin
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1876, Elemente der aristotelischen Logik, 3rd edn, repr., Munich 1967
Trendelenburg, F. A. (ed. and comm.) 1833, Aristotelis de Anima Libri Tres, Jena
Trendelenburg, F. A. (ed. and comm.) 1877, Aristotelis de Anima Libri Tres, 2nd edn, Berlin
Trenkner, S. 1952/53, ‘Aristotle, Rhetoric ⅲ, 12, 4’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s., 2: 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricot, J. (trans. and comm.) 1966, Aristote, La métaphysique, 2nd edn, Paris
Trundle, R. 1981, ‘De Interpretatione IX: The Problem of Future Truth or of Infinite Past Truth?’, The Modern Schoolman 59: 49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, E. 1956/88, ΤΙ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΙΝΟΣ: Eine Untersuchung zu Struktur und Ursprung aristotelischer Grundbegriffe, 4th edn, Freiburg and Munich
Tugendhat, E. 1966a, ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Aristoteles’ = Tugendhat (1992), 251–60
Tugendhat, E. 1966b, rev. of Oehler (1962/85) = Tugendhat (1992), 402–13
Tugendhat, E. 1992, Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt a. M
Ueberweg, F. 1868, System der Logik und Geschichte der logischen Lehren, 3rd edn, Bonn
Upton, T. V. 1988, ‘Aristotle on Existence: Escaping the Snares of Ontology?’, The New Scholasticism 62: 373–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, T. V. 1991, ‘The If-It-Is Question in Aristotle’, AP 11: 315–30Google Scholar
Vahlen, I. 1872, ‘Über eine Stelle in Aristoteles’ Schrift von der Seele’, Sitzungberichte der Wiener Akademie – Phil.-Hist. Cl. 71: 419–34Google Scholar
Vahlen, I. (ed. and comm.) 1885, Aristotelis de Arte Poetica Liber, 3rd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1964
Bennekom, R. 1975, ‘The Definitions of Σύνδ∊σμος and ἊἌρθρον in Aristotle, Poetics Ch. 20’, Mnemosyne 28: 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennekom, R. 1986, ‘Aristotle and the Copula’, JHP 24: 1–18Google Scholar
Eck, J. A. 1988, ‘Another Interpretation of Aristotle's De Interpretatione IX: A Support for the So-Called Second Oldest or “Mediaeval” Interpretation’, Vivarium 26: 19–38Google Scholar
Fraassen, B. C. 1966, ‘Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic’, JP 63: 481–95Google Scholar
van Raalte, M. (trans. and comm.) 1993, Theophrastus, Metaphysics, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
van Rijen, J. 1989, Aspects of Aristotle's Logic of Modalities, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Vasiliou, I. 1996, ‘Perception, Knowledge, and the Sceptic in Aristotle’, OSAP 14: 83–131Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (ed.) 1966, Jean Philopon, Commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote, trans. by William of Moerbeke, Louvain and Paris
Viano, C. A. 1955, La logica di Aristotele, Turin
Viano, C. A. (trans. and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, La metafisica, Turin
Vigo, A. G. 1994, ‘Wahrheit, Logos und Praxis. Die Transformation der aristotelischen Wahrheitskonzeption durch Heidegger’, Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1: 73–95Google Scholar
Vigo, A. G. 1997, ‘Der theoretische Wahrheitsbegriff bei Aristoteles. Versuch einer systematischen Rekonstruktion’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 1–48
Volkmann-Schluck, K.-H. 1979, Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, Frankfurt a. M
Vollrath, G. E. 1959, Studien zur Kategorienlehre des Aristoteles, diss. (University of Cologne)
von Fragstein, A. 1967, Die Diairesis bei Aristoteles, Amsterdam
Fritz, K. 1962, rev. of Schuhl (1960), Gnomon 34: 138–52Google Scholar
Fritz, K. 1972, rev. of D. Frede (1970), Gnomon 44: 241–50Google Scholar
Ivánka, E. 1932, ‘Die Behandlung der Metaphysik in Jaegers “Aristoteles”’, Scholastik 7: 1–29Google Scholar
von Kirchmann, J. H. 1876, Erläuterungen zu den Kategorien und den Hermeneutiken des Aristoteles, Leipzig
von Kirchmann, J. H. 1883, Erläuterungen zu Aristoteles’ Sophistischen Widerlegungen, Leipzig
Kutschera, F. 1986, ‘Zwei modallogische Argumente für den Determinismus: Aristoteles und Diodor’, Erkenntnis 24: 203–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, G. H. 1974, ‘Determinismus, Wahrheit und Zeitlichkeit. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der zukünftigen kontingenten Wahrheiten’, Studia Leibnitiana 6: 161–78Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. 1979, ‘Time, Truth and Necessity’ = Diamond/Teichmann (1979), 237–50
von Wright, G. H. 1984a, Truth, Knowledge, and Modality, Oxford
von Wright, G. H. 1984b, ‘Determinism and Future Truth’ = von Wright (1984a), 1–13
von Wright, G. H. 1984c, ‘“Omne quod est quando est necesse est esse”’ = von Wright (1984a), 72–85
Vuillemin, J. 1996, Necessity or Contingency: The Master Argument, Stanford
Vuillemin-Diem, G. (ed.) 1995, Aristoteles, Metaphysica, trans. by William of Moerbeke, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Wagner, H. 1961/62, ‘Über das Aristotelische πολλαχῶς λέγ∊ται τὸ ὄν’, Kant-Studien 53: 75–91Google Scholar
Waitz, T. 1857, ‘Varianten zu Aristoteles Organon’, Philologus 12: 726–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waitz, T. (ed. and comm.) 1844/46, Aristoteles, Organon Graece, Leipzig
Wallace, E. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1882, Aristotle's Psychology, Cambridge
Wardy, R. 1990, The Chain of Change: A Study of Aristotle's Physics VII, Cambridge
Warrington, J. (trans.) 1956, Aristotle, Metaphysics, London and New York
Waterlow, S. 1982, Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts, Oxford
Wedin, M. V. 1978, ‘Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences’, Phronesis 23: 179–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, M. V. 1988, Mind and Imagination in Aristotle, New Haven and London
Wedin, M. V. 1990, ‘Negation and Quantification in Aristotle’, HPL 11: 131–50Google Scholar
Wedin, M. V. 2000, Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta, Oxford
Weidemann, H. 1979, ‘Möglichkeit und Wahrheit. Oskar Beckers modale Grundfigur und das Aristotelische Bivalenzprinzip’, AGPh 61: 22–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidemann, H. 1980, ‘Überlegungen zu einer temporalen Modalanalyse’, ZPhF 34: 405–22Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. 1985, ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zum siebten Kapitel der aristotelischen “Hermeneutik”. Int. 7, 17b12–16/16–20’ = Wiesner (1985), 45–56
Weidemann, H. 1987, ‘Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit bei Aristoteles’, Studia Philosophica (Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Philosophischen Gesellschaft) 46: 171–89Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (trans. and comm.) 1994/2002, Aristoteles, Peri Hermeneias, 2nd edn, Berlin
Weingartner, P. 1978, ‘Brentano's Criticism of the Correspondence Theory of Truth and of the Principle “Ens et Verum Convertuntur”’ = Chisholm/Haller (1978), 183–95
Weise, C. H. (ed.) 1843, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Quae Extant …, Leipzig
Wheeler, M. 1999, ‘Semantics in Aristotle's Organon’, JHP 37: 191–226Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996, Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic, Oxford
White, A. R. 1970, Truth, London and Basingstoke
White, M. J. 1979, ‘Aristotle and Temporally Relative Modalities’, Analysis 39: 88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1980, ‘Necessity and Unactualized Possibilities in Aristotle’, Philosophical Studies 38: 287–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1981, ‘Fatalism and Causal Determinism: An Aristotelian Essay’, PQ 31: 231–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1985, Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, and Tokyo
Wieland, W. 1962, Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles, Göttingen
Wieland, W. 1972, ‘Zeitliche Kausalstrukturen in der aristotelischen Logik’, AGPh 54: 229–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, W. 1979, ‘Aristoteles und die Seeschlacht. Zur Struktur prognostischer Aussagen’, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 2: 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner, J. (ed.) 1985, Aristoteles – Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, ⅰ, Berlin and New York
Wildberg, C. 1989, ‘Two Systems in Aristotle?’, OSAP 7: 193–202Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1976, What is Truth?, Cambridge
Williams, C. J. F. 1978, ‘True Tomorrow, Never True Today’, PQ 28: 285–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1980, ‘What Is, Necessarily Is, When It Is’, Analysis 40: 127–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1981, What is Existence?, Oxford
Williams, C. J. F. 1991, ‘Aristotle and Copernican Revolutions’, Phronesis 36: 305–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. (trans. and comm.) 1982, Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione, Oxford
Williams, D. C. 1951, ‘The Sea Fight Tomorrow’ = Henle/Kallen/Langer (1951), 282–306
Williams, D. C. 1954, ‘Professor Linsky on Aristotle’, PR 63: 253–5Google Scholar
Williams, K. J. 1978, ‘Aristotle's Theory of Truth’, Prudentia 10: 67–76Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1994, Vagueness, London and New York
Wilpert, P. 1940, ‘Zum aristotelischen Wahrheitsbegriff’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 53: 3–16Google Scholar
Wilpert, P. 1949, Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre, Regensburg
Wlodarczyk, M. 2000, ‘Aristotelian Dialectic and the Discovery of Truth’, OSAP 18: 153–210Google Scholar
Wolenski, J. and Simons, P. 1989, ‘De Veritate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski’ = Szaniawski (1989), 391–442
Wolf, U. 1979, Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit bei Aristoteles und heute, Munich
Wolff, F. 1999, ‘Proposition, être et vérité. Aristote ou Antisthène? (À propos de Métaphysique Δ, 29)’ = Büttgen/Diebler/Rashed (1999), 43–63
Xenakis, J. 1957, ‘Aristotle on Truth-Value’, The New Scholasticism 31: 538–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yourgrau, P. 1985, ‘On the Logic of Indeterminist Time’, JP 82: 548–59Google Scholar
Zadro, A. 1979, Tempo ed enunciati nel ‘de interpretatione’ di Aristotele, Padua
Zadro, A. (trans. and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, I topici, Naples
Zadro, A. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1999, Aristotele, De interpretatione, Naples
Zagzebski, L. T. 1991, The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge, New York and Oxford
Zanatta, M. (trans. and comm.) 1992, Aristotele, Della interpretazione, Milan
Zanatta, M. 1995, Aristotele, Le confutazioni sofistiche, Milan
Zaslawsky, D. 1982, Analyse de l’être. Essai de philosophie analytique, Paris
Zaslawsky, D. 1986, ‘Paradoxes linguistiques: A propos de Νέξις chez Aristote’ = AA. VV. (1986), 239–61
Zell, C. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1820, Aristotelis Ethicorum Nicomacheorum Libri Decem, Heidelberg
Zeller, E. 1921, Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, ⅱ.ⅱ, 5th edn, Hildesheim 1963
Zimmermann, F. W. (trans. and comm.) 1981, Alfarabi, Commentary and Treatise on Aristotle's de Interpretatione, Oxford
ZPhhF = Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung
AA. VV. 1936, Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique (Sorbonne, Paris, 1935), ⅵ, Paris
AA. VV. 1953, Actes du XIème Congrès International de Philosophie, Bruxelles, 20–26 Août 1953, Amsterdam and Louvain
AA. VV. 1960, Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia (Venezia, 12–18 Settembre 1958), ⅺ, Florence
AA. VV. 1975, Scritti in onore di † Carlo Diano, Bologna
AA. VV. 1985, Sapienza antica. Studi in onore di Domenico Pesce, Milan
AA. VV. 1986, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité, Brussels
AA. VV. 1988, Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Papyrology, 1, Athens
Abbagnano, N. 1971, Dizionario di Filosofia, 2nd edn, Turin
Abrusci, V. M., Casari, E., and Mugnai, M. (eds.) 1983, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica, San Gimignano, 4–8 dicembre 1982, Bologna
Ackrill, J. L. 1972, ‘Aristotle on “Good” and the Categories’ = Ackrill (1997), 201–11
Ackrill, J. L. 1997, Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford
Ackrill, J. L. (trans. and comm.) 1963, Aristotle, Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford
ACPA = Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Adorno, F. 1961, La filosofia antica, ⅰ, Milan
AGPh = Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Alberti, A. (ed.) 1990, Logica, mente e persona. Studi sulla filosofia antica, Florence
Alberti, A. (ed.) 1994, Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica, Florence
Albritton, R. A. 1957, ‘Present Truth and Future Contingency’, PR 66: 29–46Google Scholar
Algra, K. A. A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 1999, The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge
Algra, K. A. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. T. (eds.) 1996, Polyhistor: Studies … Presented to Jaap Mansfeld …, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Angelelli, I. and Cerezo, M. (eds.) 1996, Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the History of Logic, Berlin and New York
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1956/68, ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle: De Interpretatione, Chapter IX’ = Moravcsik (1968), 15–33
Anscombe, G. E. M. and Geach, P. T. 1961, Three Philosophers, Oxford
Antiseri, D. (trans. and comm.) 1969, Aristotele, De Interpretatione, Bergamo
Anton, J. P. 1992, ‘On the Meaning of Kategoria in Aristotle's Categories’ = Preus/Anton (1992), 1–18
AP = Ancient Philosophy
Apelt, O. 1891a, Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Leipzig
Apelt, O. 1891b, ‘Die Kategorieenlehre des Aristoteles’ = Apelt (1891a), 101–216
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1966, Aristotle, Metaphysics, Bloomington, Ind. and London
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1980, Aristotle, Categories and Propositions (De Interpretatione), Grinnell, Ia
Apostle, H. G. (trans. and comm.) 1981, Aristotle, On the Soul, Grinnell, Ia
Arens, H. 1984, Aristotle's Theory of Language and its Tradition: Texts from 500 to 1750, Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Astroh, M. 1981, ‘Apophansis und Kontingenz. Zum neunten Kapitel der Schrift Peri Hermeneias’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 43: 328–62Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. 1962/83, Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne, 5th edn, Paris
Aubenque, P. 1979a, ‘La pensée du simple dans la Métaphysique (Ζ 17 et Θ 10)’ = Aubenque (1979b), 69–80
Aubenque, P. (ed.) 1979b, Etudes sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote – Actes du VIe Symposium Aristotelicum, Paris
Aubenque, P. (ed.) 1980, Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, Paris
Austin, J. L. 1950, ‘Truth’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 149–61
Avgelis, N. and Peonidis, F. (eds.) 1998, Aristotle on Logic, Language and Science, Thessaloniki
BACAP = Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy
Bäck, A. T. 1992, ‘Sailing through the Sea Battle’, AP 12: 133–51Google Scholar
Bäck, A. T. 2000, Aristotle's Theory of Predication, Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
Badawi, A. 1971, Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en Grec, Beirut
Badawi, A. 1987, La transmission de la philosophie grecque au monde arabe, 2nd edn, Paris
Baldassarri, M. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1985/87, La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti, Como
Bambrough, R. (ed.) 1965, New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London and New York
Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.) 1965, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, Amsterdam
Barnes, J. 1986, ‘Peripatetic Negations’, OSAP 4: 201–14Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1993, ‘Meaning, Saying and Thinking’ = Döring/Ebert (1993), 47–61
Barnes, J. 1995a, ‘Metaphysics’ = Barnes (1995b), 66–108
Barnes, J. 1996, ‘Grammar on Aristotle's Terms’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 175–202
Barnes, J. 1999a, ‘Aristotle and Stoic Logic’ = Ierodiakonou (1999), 23–53
Barnes, J. 1999b, ‘Logic: I The Peripatetics’ = Algra/Barnes/Mansfeld/Schofield (1999), 77–83
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1995b, The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge
Barnes, J. (trans. and comm.) 1994, Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, 2nd edn, Oxford
Bärthlein, K. 1972, Die Transzendentalienlehre der alten Ontologie, ⅰ, Berlin and New York
Battegazzore, A. M. (ed.) 1993, Dimostrazione, argomentazione dialettica e argomentazione retorica nel pensiero antico. Atti del Convegno di Filosofia (Bocca di Magra, 18–22 marzo 1990), Genoa
Baudry, L. 1950, La querelle des futurs contingents (Louvain 1465–1475). Textes inédits, Paris
Baylis, C. A. 1936, ‘Are Some Propositions neither True nor False?’, Philosophy of Science 3: 156–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaney, M. 1996, Frege: Making Sense, London
Becker, A. 1936, ‘Bestreitet Aristoteles die Gültigkeit des “Tertium non datur” für Zukunftsaussagen? (Zum 9. Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik)’ = AA. VV. (1936), 69–74
Becker, O. 1957a, Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik, Wiesbaden
Becker, O. 1957b, ‘Chrysippos über den “Lügner”’ = O. Becker (1957a), 50–2
Bekker, I. and Gigon, O. (eds.) 1960/87, Aristotelis Opera, 2nd ed., Berlin
Belardi, W. 1977, ‘Semantica di σύνδ∊σμος e di ἀσύνδ∊τος in Aristotele’, Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 105: 257–73Google Scholar
Bencivenga, E., Lambert, K., and van Fraassen, B. C. 1986/91, Logic, Bivalence, and Denotation, 2nd edn, Atascadero, Calif
Benson, H. H. 1988, ‘Universals as Sortals in the Categories’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 282–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Zeev, A. 1984, ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Truth and Falsity’, Apeiron 18: 118–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, E. 1978, ‘The Intellection of “Indivisibles” according to Aristotle, de Anima III 6’ = Lloyd/Owen (1978), 141–63
Berti, E. 1983a, ‘La fonction de Métaph. Alpha Elatton dans la philosophie d’Aristote’ = Moraux/Wiesner (1983), 260–94
Berti, E. 1983b, ‘Quelques remarques sur la conception aristotélicienne du non-être’, RPA 1: 115–42Google Scholar
Berti, E. 1990, ‘Heidegger e il concetto aristotelico di verità’ = Brague/Courtine (1990), 97–120
Berti, E. 1992, Aristotele nel Novecento, Rome and Bari
Berti, E. 1993, ‘Intellezione e dialettica in Aristotele, Metaph. IX 10’ = Battegazzore (1993), 21–36
Berti, E. 1994, ‘Encore sur l’intellection des “indivisibles” selon Aristote, De anima III 6’ = Alberti (1994), 123–36
Berti, E. 1996a, ‘Encore sur l’intellection des “indivisibles” selon Aristote, De anima III 6’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 391–404
Berti, E. 1996b, ‘La logica dell’argomentazione filosofica tra Aristotele e Ryle’ = Guetti/Pujia (1996), 59–68
Berti, E. 2000, ‘I luoghi della verità secondo Aristotele. Un confronto con Heidegger’ = Melchiorre (2000), 3–27
Berti, E. (ed.) 1981, Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’ – Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum Held in Padua from September 7 to 15, 1978, Padua
Berti, E. (ed.) 1997, Guida ad Aristotele, Rome and Bari
Besoli, S. 1985, ‘Percezione, verità e giudizio: luoghi dell’intuizionismo aristotelico’ = Besoli (2002), 9–54
Besoli, S. 2002, Esistenza, verità e giudizio. Percorsi di critica e fenomenologia della conoscenza, Macerata
BICS = Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Bird, O. 1964, Syllogistic and Its Extensions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Birondo, N. 2001, ‘Aristotle on Illusory Perception: Phantasia without Phantasmata’, AP 21: 57–71Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. (eds.) 1999, Truth, Oxford
Blanché, R. and Dubucs, J. 1970/96, La logique et son histoire, Paris
Blank, D. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Ammonius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8, London
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (eds., trans., and comm.) 1998, On Determinism: Ammonius On Aristotle On Interpretation 9 with Boethius On Aristotle On Interpretation 9 First and Second Commentaries, London
Blettner, E. 1983, ‘One Made Many and Many Made One: The Role of Asyndeton in Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16: 49–54Google Scholar
Block, I. 1961, ‘Truth and Error in Aristotle's Theory of Sense Perception’, PQ 11: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford
Bobzien, S. 2000, ‘Wholly Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Phronesis 45: 87–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2002, ‘The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd Century ad’, Phronesis 47: 359–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochenski, I. M. 1947, La logique de Théophraste, Fribourg en Suisse
Bochenski, I. M. 1951, Ancient Formal Logic, Amsterdam
Bochenski, I. M. 1962, Formale Logik, 2nd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Bodéüs, R. (trans. and comm.) 1993, Aristote, De l’âme, Paris
Bodéüs, R. (ed. and comm.) 2001, Aristote, [Catégories], Paris
Boehner, P., Moody, E. A., Gál, G., Gambatese, A., and Brown, S. (eds.) 1978, William of Ockham, Expositionis in Libros Artis Logicae Prooemium, Expositio in Librum Porphyrii de Predicabilibus, Expositio in Librum Praedicamentorum Aristotelis, Expositio in Librum Perihermeneias Aristotelis, Tractatus de Praedestinatione et de Praescientia Dei respectu Futurorum Contingentium, St Bonaventure, NY
Bolton, R. 1976, ‘Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, II, 7–10’, PR 85: 514–44Google Scholar
Bonitz, H. 1842, Observationes criticae in Aristotelis libros metaphysicos, Berlin
Bonitz, H. 1862/67, Aristotelische Studien, repr., Hildesheim 1969
Bonitz, H. 1870, Index Aristotelicus, repr., Graz 1955
Bonitz, H. (ed. and comm.) 1848/49, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Bonn
Bonitz, H. (trans.) 1890, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, repr., Munich 1966
Bonomi, A. and Zucchi, A. 2001, Tempo e linguaggio. Introduzione alla semantica del tempo e dell’aspetto verbale, Milan
Bormann, K. 1982, ‘Wahrheitsbegriff und νοῦς-Lehre bei Aristoteles und einigen seiner Kommentatoren’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 12: 1–24Google Scholar
Bosley, R. 1977, ‘In Support of an Interpretation of On Int. 9’, Ajatus 37: 29–40Google Scholar
Bostock, D. (trans. and comm.) 1994, Aristotle, Metaphysics: Books Ζ and H, Oxford
Bottani, A., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P. (eds.) 2002, Individuals, Essence and Identity: Themes of Analytic Metaphysics, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Boudot, M. 1973, ‘Temps, nécessité et prédétermination’, Les Études Philosophiques n.n.: 435–73
Bradley, R. D. 1959/68, ‘Must the Future Be What It Is Going to Be?’ = Gale (1968), 232–51
Brague, R. and Courtine, F. (eds.) 1990, Herméneutique et ontologie. Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris
Brakas, G. 1988, Aristotle's Concept of the Universal, Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York
Brandis, C. A. 1835/66, Handbuch der Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Philosophie, Berlin
Brandis, C. A. 1862/64, Geschichte der Entwicklungen der griechischen Philosophie und ihrer Nachwirkungen im römischen Reiche, repr., Hildesheim and New York 1981
Brandis, C. A. (ed.) 1823, Aristotelis et Theophrasti Metaphysica, Berlin
Brandt, R. 1965, Die Aristotelische Urteilslehre. Untersuchungen zur ‘Hermeneutik’, Marburg
Brentano, F. 1862, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles, repr., Darmstadt 1960
Brentano, F. 1874/1925, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, ed. by O. Kraus, repr., Hamburg 1955 and 1959
Brentano, F. 1889, ‘Über den Begriff der Wahrheit’ = Brentano (1930), 3–29
Brentano, F. 1909, ‘De Interpretatione’ = Brentano (1986), 59–65
Brentano, F. 1914a, ‘Über die Entstehung der irrigen Lehre von den entia irrealia’ = Brentano (1930), 162–4
Brentano, F. 1914b, ‘Zur Frage der Existenz der Inhalte und von der adaequatio rei et intellectus’ = Brentano (1930), 121–30
Brentano, F. 1915a, Letter to O. Kraus dated 9 January, 1915, partly quoted in Brentano (1930), 219–20
Brentano, F. 1915b, ‘Über den Sinn des Satzes: veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus’ = Brentano (1930), 131–6
Brentano, F. 1930, Wahrheit und Evidenz, ed. by O. Kraus, repr., Hamburg 1974
Brentano, F. 1952, Grundlegung und Aufbau der Ethik, ed. by F. Mayer-Hillebrand, Bern
Brentano, F. 1986, Über Aristoteles, ed. by R. George, Hamburg
Brentano, F. n.d., ‘Aristoteles’ Lehre von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden’ = Brentano (1986), 190–7
Brown, L. 1994, ‘The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’ = Everson (1994), 212–36
Brunschwig, J. 1969, ‘La proposition particulière et les preuves de non-concluance chez Aristote’, Cahiers pour l’Analyse 10: 3–26Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1979, ‘La forme, prédicat de la matière?’ = Aubenque (1979b), 131–66
Brunschwig, J. 1991, ‘On a Book-Title by Chrysipppus: “On the Fact that the Ancients Admitted Dialectic along with Demonstrations”’, OSAPsuppl. vol.: 81–95Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1999, ‘Homonymie et contradiction dans la dialectique aristotélicienne’ = Büttgen/Diebler/Rashed (1999), 81–101
Brunschwig, J. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1967, Aristote, Topiques, ⅰ, Paris
Buhle, I. T. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1792/1800, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Graece …, Biponti
Bullinger, A. 1882, Aristoteles’ Nus-Lehre (De an. III, c. 4–8 incl.), Dillingen
Burnyeat, M. 2002, ‘De Anima II 5’, Phronesis 47: 281–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. et al. 1984, Notes on Eta and Theta of Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford
Burrell, D. 1964, ‘Aristotle and “Future Contingencies”’, Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 13: 37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, C., Dübner, F., and Heitz, A. (eds. and trans.) 1848/74, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Graece et Latine, Paris
Butler, R. J. 1955, ‘Aristotle's Sea Fight and Three-Valued Logic’, PR 64: 264–74Google Scholar
Butterworth, C. E. (trans. and comm.) 1983, Averroes, Middle Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Princeton
Büttgen, P., Diebler, S., and Rashed, M. (eds.) 1999, Théories de la phrase et de la proposition de Platon à Averroès, Paris
Bywater, I. 1913, ‘Aristotelia V’, The Journal of Philology 32: 107–22Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed. and comm.) 1909, Aristotle, On the Art of Poetry, Oxford
Cahn, S. M. 1967, Fate, Logic, and Time, New Haven and London
Calogero, G. 1927, ‘Una nuova concezione della logica prearistotelica’ = Calogero (1984), 349–62
Calogero, G. 1927/68, I fondamenti della logica aristotelica, 2nd edn, Florence
Calogero, G. 1984, Scritti minori di filosofia antica, Naples
Capozzi, G. 1974, Giudizio, prova e verità. I principi della scienza nell’analitica di Aristotele, Naples
Carson, D. S. 1996, Being and Truth: Elements of Aristotle's Philosophy of Language, diss. (Duke University)
Casari, E. 1984, ‘Note sulla logica aristotelica della comparazione’, Sileno 10: 131–46Google Scholar
Cashdollar, S. 1973, ‘Aristotle's Account of Incidental Perception’, Phronesis 18: 156–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B. 1996, ‘Enquête sur le logos dans le De anima’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 257–93
Cassirer, H. 1932, Aristoteles’ Schrift ‘Von der Seele’ und ihre Stellung innerhalb der aristotelischen Philosophie, Tübingen
Caston, V. 1996, ‘Why Aristotle Needs Imagination’, Phronesis 41: 20–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1998a, ‘Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1998b, ‘Commentary on Kurt Pritzl: Aristotle on the Conditions of Thought’, BACAP 14: 202–12Google Scholar
Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.) 2002, Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, Aldershot
Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (eds.) 1950, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Duodecim Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio, Turin and Rome
Cavini, W. 1985, ‘La negazione di frase nella logica greca’ = Cavini/Donnini Macciò/Funghi/Manetti (1985), 7–126
Cavini, W. 1993a, ‘Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar’ = Döring/Ebert (1993), 85–109
Cavini, W. 1993b, ‘Aristotele e i modi del paradosso’ = Battegazzore (1993), 61–81
Cavini, W. 1998, ‘Arguing from a Definition: Aristotle on Truth and the Excluded Middle’ = Avgelis/Peonidis (1998), 5–15
Cavini, W., Donnini Macciò, M. C., Funghi, M. S., and Manetti, D. 1985, Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, Florence
Celluprica, V. 1977, Il capitolo 9 del ‘De interpretatione’ di Aristotele. Rassegna di studi: 1930–1973, Bologna
Celluprica, V. 1987, ‘Logica e semantica nella teoria aristotelica della predicazione’, Phronesis 32: 166–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 1994, ‘Aristotle on Names and Their Signification’ = Everson (1994), 37–73
Charles, D. 1997, ‘Method and Argument in the Study of Aristotle: A Critical Notice of The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’, OSAP 15: 231–57Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000, Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford
Charles, D. 2002, ‘Some Comments on Prof. Enrico Berti's “Being and Essence in Contemporary Interpretations of Aristotle”’ = Bottani/Carrara/Giaretta (2002), 109–26
Chisholm, R. M. 1966, Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Chisholm, R. M. and Haller, R. (eds.) 1978, Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos: Beiträge zur Brentano-Konferenz (Graz, 4.–8. September 1977), Amsterdam
Christ, W. (ed.) 1906, Aristotelis Metaphysica, 2nd edn, Leipzig
Church, A. 1965, ‘The History of the Question of Existential Import of Categorical Propositions’ = Bar-Hillel (1965), 417–24
Cleary, J. J. 1988, Aristotle on the Many Senses of Priority, Carbondale and Edwardsville
Code, A. 1976, ‘Aristotle's Response to Quine's Objections to Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5: 159–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, G. (trans. and comm.) 1955, Aristotele, Organon, Turin
Conybeare, F. C. 1892, Anecdota Oxoniensia: A Collation with the Ancient Armenian Versions of the Greek Text of Aristotle's Categories, de Interpretatione, de Mundo, de Virtutibus et Vitiis, and of Porphyry's Introduction, Oxford
Cooke, H. P. and Tredennick, H. (eds. and trans.) 1938, Aristotle, The Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Cope, E. M. and Sandys, J. E. (eds. and comm.) 1877, The Rhetoric of Aristotle, Cambridge
Corsi, G., Mangione, C., and Mugnai, M. (eds.) 1989, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica. Le teorie delle modalità (San Gimignano, 5–8 dicembre 1987), Bologna
Cosenza, P. 1983, ‘Procedimenti di trasformazione nella sillogistica di Aristotele’ = Abrusci/Casari/Mugnai (1983), 223–8
Cosenza, P. 1987, Logica formale e antiformalismo (da Aristotele a Descartes), Naples
Craig, W. L. 1988, The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingency from Aristotle to Suarez, Leiden, New York, Copenhagen, and Cologne
Cresswell, M. J. 1971, ‘Essence and Existence in Plato and Aristotle’, Theoria 37: 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1989, ‘Presupposti esistenziali della negazione in Aristotele’, Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia – Università di Firenze 5: 45–90Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1990, ‘Il “Sofista” di Platone. Non essere, negazione e falsità’, Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’ 55: 9–104Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 1996, ‘Notes on Aristotle's Conception of Truth’ = Funghi (1996), 147–59
Crivelli, P. 1999, ‘Aristotle on the Truth of Utterances’, OSAP 17: 37–56Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2001, ‘Empty Terms in Aristotle's Logic’, BACAP 17: 237–69, 282–4Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2002, ‘Sameness in Aristotle's Topics’ = Bottani/Carrara/Giaretta (2002), 239–45
Damschen, G. 2001, ‘Aristoteles, “Analytica Posteriora” A 2, 72a8–9: “Der eine Teil einer Aussage”’, Hermes 129: 125–8Google Scholar
Dancy, R. M. 1986, ‘Aristotle and Existence’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 49–80
Dapunt, I. 1968, ‘Zwei Typen von Systemen der traditionellen Logik’, AGPh 50: 275–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 1994, Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth, New York and Oxford
Davidson, D. 1996, ‘The Folly of Trying to Define Truth’, JP 93: 263–78Google Scholar
Décarie, V. 1961, L’objet de la métaphysique selon Aristote, Montreal and Paris
De Corte, M. 1934, La doctrine de l’intelligence chez Aristote, Paris
de Koninck, T. 1990, ‘La noêsis et l’indivisible selon Aristote’ = Mattéi (1990), 215–28
del Punta, F. (ed.) 1979, William of Ockham, Expositio super Libros Elenchorum, St Bonaventure, NY
Demoss, D. andDevereux, D. T. 1988, ‘Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics II 8–10’, Phronesis 33: 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deninger, J. G. 1961, ‘Wahres Sein’ in der Philosophie des Aristoteles, Meisenheim am Glan
Denyer, N. 1991, Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy, London and New York
de Rijk, L. M. 1952, The Place of the Categories of Being in Aristotle's Philosophy, Assen
de Rijk, L. M. 1987, ‘The Anatomy of the Proposition: Logos and Pragma in Plato and Aristotle’ = de Rijk/Braakhuis (1987), 27–61
de Rijk, L. M. 1996, ‘On Aristotle's Semantics in de Interpretatione 1–4’ = Algra et al. (1996), 115–34
de Rijk, L. M. 2002, Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology, Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
de Rijk, L. M. and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (eds.) 1987, Logos and Pragma: Essays on the Philosophy of Language in Honour of Professor Gabriel Nuchelmans, Nijmegen
Detel, W. 1998, ‘Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and the Path to the Principles’ = Avgelis/Peonidis (1998), 155–81
Devereux, D. T. 1992, ‘Inherence and Primary Substance in Aristotle's Categories’, AP 12: 113–31Google Scholar
Diamond, C. and Teichmann, J. (eds.) 1979, Intention and Intentionality: Essays in Honour of G. E. M. Anscombe, Ithaca
Dickason, A. 1976, ‘Aristotle, the Sea Fight, and the Cloud’, JHP 14: 11–22Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1883, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ⅰ, 7th edn, Stuttgart and Göttingen 1959
Dod, B. G. (ed.) 1975, Aristoteles, de Sophisticis Elenchis, trans. by Boethius, James of Venice, and William of Moerbeke, Leiden and Brussels
Donini, P. L. 1989, Ethos. Aristotele e il determinismo, Alessandria
Döring, A. 1890, ‘Die aristotelischen Definitionen von σύνδ∊σμος und ἄρθρον, Poetik c. 20’, AGPh 3: 363–9Google Scholar
Döring, K. 1972, Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien, Amsterdam
Döring, K. and Ebert, T. (eds.) 1993, Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, Stuttgart
Dorion, L.-A. (trans. and comm.) 1995, Aristote, Les réfutations sophistiques, Paris
DuLac, H. 1949, ‘The Peri Hermeneias: Its Place in Logic and Its Order’, Laval théologique et philosophique 5: 161–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duminil, M.-P. and Jaulin, A. (trans. and comm.) 1991, Aristote, Metaphysiques. Livre Delta, Toulouse
Düring, I. 1961, Aristotle's Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction, Stockholm, Göteborg, and Uppsala
Düring, I. 1966, Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Heidelberg
Düring, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.) 1960, Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century: Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum Held at Oxford in August 1957, Göteborg
Du Val, G. (ed. and comm.) 1629, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Quae Exstant Graece et Latine …, Paris
Ebbesen, S. 1981, Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi, Leiden
Ebbesen, S. 1986, ‘The Chimera's Diary’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 115–42
Edel, A. 1982, Aristotle and His Philosophy, Chapel Hill, NC
Edwards, P. (ed.) 1967, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York and London
Enders, M. 1999, Wahrheit und Notwendigkeit. Die Theorie der Wahrheit bei Anselm von Canterbury im Gesamtzusammenhang seines Denkens und unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner antiken Quellen (Aristoteles, Cicero, Augustinus, Boethius), Leiden, Boston, and Cologne
Engel, P. 2002, Truth, Chesham
Engelhardt, P. M. 1953, Die Wahrheit in der Einheit und Entzweiung, diss. (Univ. of Freiburg i. Br.)
Engmann, J. 1976, ‘Imagination and Truth in Aristotle’, JHP 14: 259–65Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1979, ‘Does Tense Logic Rest upon a Mistake?’ = Evans (1985), 343–63
Evans, G. 1985, Collected Papers, Oxford
Everson, S. (ed.) 1994, Language, Cambridge
Everson, S. 1995, ‘Proper Sensibles and αθ ὑτά Causes’, Phronesis 40: 265–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everson, S. 1997, Aristotle on Perception, Oxford
Fait, P. 1996, ‘Il linguaggio e l’abaco (Aristotele, Soph. El. 1, 165a6–17)’ = Funghi (1996), 181–90
Fait, P. 1998, ‘L’éristique mise en formules’, Dialogue 37: 131–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattal, M. 1996, ‘L’intellection des indivisibles dans le De anima (ⅲ, 6) d’Aristote. Lectures arabes et modernes’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 423–40
Faust, A. 1931/32, Der Möglichkeitsgedanke. Systemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen, repr., New York and London 1987
Field, H. 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’, JP 69: 347–75Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1980, ‘The One over Many’, PR 89: 197–240Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1984a, ‘Truth and Necessity in De Interpretatione 9’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 1: 23–47Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1984b, ‘Separation’, OSAP 2: 31–87Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1985, ‘Separation: A Reply to Morrison’, OSAP 3: 159–65Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1993, On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms, Oxford
Fiorentino, F. 2001, ‘Il problema della verità in Aristotele’, Sapienza 54: 257–302Google Scholar
Fleischer, M. 1984, Wahrheit und Wahrheitsgrund: Zum Wahrheitsproblem und zu seiner Geschichte, Berlin and New York
Fonseca, P. 1577/89, Commentarii in Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae Libros, rev. edn, Cologne 1615/24, repr., Hildesheim 1964
Förster, A. (ed.) 1912, Aristotelis de Anima Libri III, Budapest
Forster, E. S. and Furley, D. J. (eds. and trans.) 1955, Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away, On the Cosmos, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., Sharples, R. W., and Gutas, D. (eds. and trans.) 1993, Theophrastus of Eresus, Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Fox, J. F. 1987, ‘Truthmaker’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, K. 2002, ‘Demonstrative Science and the Science of Being qua Being’, OSAP 22: 43–82Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1970, Aristoteles und die ‘Seeschlacht’. Das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9, Göttingen
Frede, D. 1972, ‘Omne quod est quando est necesse est esse’, AGPh 54: 153–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D. 1985, ‘The Sea-Battle Reconsidered: A Defence of the Traditional Interpretation’, OSAP 3: 31–87Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1990, ‘Fatalism and Future Truth’, BACAP 6: 195–227Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1998, ‘Logik, Sprache und die Offenheit der Zukunft in der Antike: Bemerkungen zu zwei neuen Forschungsbeiträgen’, ZPhF 52: 84–104Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1967, Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von ‘… ist …’ und ‘… ist nicht …’ im Sophistes, Göttingen
Frede, M. 1978, ‘Individuals in Aristotle’ = M. Frede (1987), 49–71, 367
Frede, M. 1981, ‘Categories in Aristotle’ = M. Frede (1987), 29–48, 367
Frede, M. 1987, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford
Frede, M. and Patzig, G. 1988, Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Munich
Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) 1996, Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford
Freese, J. H. (ed. and trans.) 1926, Aristotle, The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric, London and New York
Freeland, C. 1992, ‘Aristotle on the Sense of Touch’ = Nussbaum/Oksenberg Rorty (1992/95), 227–48
Frege, G. 1918/19, ‘Die Verneinung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 143–57Google Scholar
Funghi, M. S. (ed.) 1996, ΟΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ–Le vie della ricerca. Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno, Florence
Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.) 1983/89, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster
Gagnebin, C. (ed.) 1981, Métaphysique, histoire de la philosophie. Recueil d’études offert à F. Brunner, Neuchâtel
Gale, R. M. 1961, ‘Endorsing Predictions’, PR 70: 376–85Google Scholar
Gale, R. M. (ed.) 1968, The Philosophy of Time: A Collection of Essays, London and Melbourne
Gallavotti, C. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, Dell’arte poetica, n.p.
Galluzzo, G. 1997/98, Il concetto di verità nei primi scritti di S. Agostino, diss. (University of Pisa)
Galluzzo, G. 2000, ‘Il tema della verità dell’Expositio Libri Peryermenias di Tommaso d’Aquino’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11: 217–57Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1994, ‘Fatalism, Foreknowledge and the Reality of the Future’, The Modern Schoolman 81: 83–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1995, The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future, Berlin and New York
Gaskin, R. 1996, ‘Sea Battles, Worn-out Cloaks, and Other Matters of Interpretation: Weidemann on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias’, AGPh 78: 48–59Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1998, ‘Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on In Cat. 396, 30–397, 28’, Phronesis 43: 42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. (trans. and comm.) 2000, Simplicius, On Aristotle Categories 9–15, London
Geach, P. T. 1963, ‘Aristotle on Conjunctive Propositions’ = Geach (1972), 13–27
Geach, P. T. 1968, ‘History of the Corruptions of Logic’ = Geach (1972), 44–61
Geach, P. T. 1972, Logic Matters, repr., Berkeley and Los Angeles 1980
Geyser, G. J. A. M. 1917, Die Erkenntnistheorie des Aristoteles, repr., Aalen 1980
Gigon, O. and Fischer, M. W. (eds.) 1988, Antike Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt a. M., Bern, New York, and Paris
Gobbo, E. 1997, ‘La concezione “diretta” dell’ ἔλ∊γχος negli Analitici primi e nelle Confutazioni sofistiche’, Elenchos 18: 311–57Google Scholar
Gohlke, P. (trans. and comm.) 1951, Aristoteles, Kategorien und Hermeneutik, Paderborn
Gohlke, P. (trans. and comm.) 1961, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, 2nd edn, Paderborn
Goldin, O. 1996, Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 2.1–10, Ann Arbor
Goldin, O. 2002, ‘To Tell the Truth: Dissoi Logoi 4 and Aristotle's Responses’ = Caston/Graham (2002), 233–49
Gómez-Lobo, A. 1980, ‘The So-Called Question of Existence in Aristotle, An. Post. 2. 1–2’, RM 34: 71–89Google Scholar
Goodwin, W. W. 1889, Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, repr., Bristol 1998
Gourinat, J.-B. 2000, La dialectique des stoïciens, Paris
Graeser, A. 1977, ‘On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’, Dialectica 31: 359–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeser, A. 1978, ‘Sprache und Ontologie bei Aristoteles’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 25: 443–55Google Scholar
Graeser, A. 1981, ‘Aristotle and Aquinas on Being as Being True’ = Gagnebin (1981), 85–97
Graeser, A. 1983a, ‘Aspekte der Ontologie in der Kategorienschrift’ = Moraux/Wiesner (1983), 30–56
Graeser, A. 1983b, Die Philosophie der Antike 2: Sophistik und Sokratik, Plato und Aristoteles, Munich
Graeser, A. (ed. and comm.) 1973, Die logischen Fragmente des Theophrast, Berlin and New York
Graham, D. W. 1987, Aristotle's Two Systems, Oxford
Grant, C. K. 1957, ‘Certainty, Necessity and Aristotle's Sea Battle’, Mind 66: 522–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayeff, F. 1974, Aristotle and His School: An Inquiry into the History of the Peripatos with a Commentary on Metaphysics Ζ, Η, Λ and Δ, London
Grice, P. 1988, ‘Aristotle on the Multiplicity of Being’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 175–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossato, A. 1999, ‘La critica del capitolo 9 del De interpretatione di Aristotele mediante la logica formale moderna’ = Zadro (1999), 397–443
Grote, G. 1880, Aristotle, ed. by A. Bain and G. C. Robertson, 2nd edn, London
Gudeman, A. (ed. and comm.) 1934, Aristoteles, ΠΗΡ Ι ΠΟΙΗ ΤΙ ΚΗΣ, Berlin
Guetti, C. and Pujia, R. (eds.) 1996, Atti del convegno ‘Momenti di Storia della Logica e di Storia della Filosofia’, Roma, 9–11 novembre 1994, Rome
Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) 1997, Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullman, Stuttgart
Haack, S. 1974/96, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, 2nd edn, Chicago and London
Hadot, P. 1980, ‘Sur divers sens du mot pragma dans la tradition philosophique grecque’ = Aubenque (1980), 309–19
Hafemann, B. 1998, Aristoteles’ Transzendentaler Realismus. Inhalt und Umfang erster Prinzipien in der ‘Metaphysik’, Berlin and New York
Hafemann, B. 1999, ‘Indefinite Aussagen und das kontingent Zukünftige: Akzidenzien allgemeiner Gegenstände und graduelle Wahrheit in AristotelesDe Interpretatione 7 und 9’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 2: 109–37Google Scholar
Hallett, G. L. 1988, Language and Truth, New Haven and London
Halper, E. C. 1989, One and Many in Aristotle's Metaphysics: The Central Books, Columbus, Ohio
Hamblin, C. L. 1970, Fallacies, London
Hamlyn, D. W. 1962, ‘The Correspondence Theory of Truth’, PQ 12: 193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (trans. and comm.) 1968/93, Aristotle, De Anima: Books II and III (with Passages from Book I), 2nd edn (with contributions by C. Shields), Oxford
Harris, L. D. 1977/78, ‘Solving the “Naval Battle”’, PAS n.s., 78: 45–61Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. 1965, ‘The Meaning of “Is Going to Be”’, Mind 74: 46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. J. 1975, Aristotle on Truth with Respect to Incomposites, diss. (University of Michigan)
Harvey, P. J. 1978, ‘Aristotle on Truth and Falsity in De Anima 3. 6’, JHP 16: 219–20Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1924/25, Platon. Sophistes, ed. by I. Schüssler, Frankfurt a. M. 1992
Heidegger, M. 1925/26, Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, ed. by W. Biemel, 2nd edn, Frankfurt a. M. 1995
Heidegger, M. 1926, Die Grundbegriffe der antiken Philosophie, ed. by F.-K. Bust, Frankfurt a. M. 1993
Heidegger, M. 1927, Sein und Zeit, 10th edn, Tübingen 1963
Heidegger, M. 1930, Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie, ed. by H. Tietjen, Frankfurt a. M. 1982
Heidegger, M. 1930/31, ‘Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit’ = Heidegger (1967), 109–44
Heidegger, M. 1946, ‘Brief über den “Humanismus”’ = Heidegger (1967), 145–94
Heidegger, M. 1967, Wegmarken, Frankfurt a. M
Heinaman, R. 1981, ‘Non-substantial Individuals in the Categories’, Phronesis 26: 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, P., Kallen, H. M., and Langer, S. K. (eds.) 1951, Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Henry M. Sheffer, New York
Hennigfeld, J. 1994, Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Antike und Mittelalter, Berlin and New York
Herbertz, R. 1913, Das Wahrheitsproblem in der griechischen Philosophie, Berlin
Hicks, R. D. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1907, Aristotle, De Anima, Cambridge
Hildebrand, H. 1884, Aristoteles’ Stellung zum Determinismus und Indeterminismus, diss. (University of Leipzig)
Hintikka, J. 1957, ‘Necessity, Universality and Time in Aristotle’, Ajatus 20: 65–90Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1964/73a, ‘The Once and Future Sea Fight: Aristotle's Discussion of Future Contingents in De Interpretatione IX’ = Hintikka (1973), 147–78
Hintikka, J. 1964/73b, ‘Aristotle and the “Master Argument” of Diodorus’ = Hintikka (1973), 179–213
Hintikka, J. 1967/73, ‘Time, Truth, and Knowledge in Aristotle and Other Greek Philosophers’ = Hintikka (1973), 62–92
Hintikka, J. 1973, Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle's Theory of Modality, Oxford
Hintikka, J. 1986, ‘The Varieties of Being in Aristotle’ = Knuuttila/Hintikka (1986), 81–114
Hintikka, J. 1999, ‘On Aristotle's Notion of Existence’, RM 52: 779–805Google Scholar
Hintikka, J., Remes, U., and Knuuttila, S. 1977, Aristotle on Modality and Determinism, Amsterdam
Hitchcock, D. 2000, ‘Fallacies and Formal Logic in Aristotle’, HPL 21: 207–21Google Scholar
Hiz, H. (ed.) 1978, Questions, Dordrecht
Hope, R. (trans.) 1952, Aristotle, Metaphysics, repr., Ann Arbor, Mich. 1994
Horn, H.-J. 1994, Studien zum dritten Buch der aristotelischen Schrift De anima, Göttingen
HPL = History and Philosophy of Logic
Hughes, R. I. G. (ed.) 1993, A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
Humbert, J. 1945/60, Syntaxe grecque, 3rd edn, Paris
Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) 1999, Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford
Ihrig, A. H. 1965, ‘Remarks on Logical Necessity and Future Contingencies’, Mind 74: 215–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inciarte, F. 1999, ‘Aristotle and Aquinas: The Principle of Excluded Middle’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 2: 139–48Google Scholar
Irmscher, J. and Müller, R. (eds.) 1983, Aristoteles als Wissenschaftstheoretiker, Berlin
Irwin, T. H. 1977, Plato's Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford
Irwin, T. H. 1982, ‘Aristotle's Concept of Signification’ = Schofield/Craven Nussbaum (1982), 241–66
Irwin, T. H. 1988, Aristotle's First Principles, Oxford
Isnardi Parente, M. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1980, Speusippo, Frammenti, Naples
Jacobs, W. 1979, ‘Aristotle and Non-Referring Subjects’, Phronesis 24: 282–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, W. 1980, ‘The Existential Presuppositions of Aristotle's Logic’, Philosophical Studies 37: 419–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, W. W. 1911, ‘Emendationum aristotelearum specimen’ = Jaeger (1960), 1–38
Jaeger, W. W. 1912, Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles, Berlin
Jaeger, W. W. 1923, Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung, Berlin
Jaeger, W. W. 1960, Scripta minora, ⅰ, Rome
Jaeger, W. W. (ed.) 1957, Aristotelis Metaphysica, Oxford
Jeffrey, R. C. 1979, ‘Coming True’ = Diamond/Teichmann (1979), 251–60
JHP = Journal of the History of Philosophy
Joachim, H. H. 1906, The Nature of Truth, Oxford
Joachim, H. H. 1948, Logical Studies, Oxford
Joachim, H. H. (ed. and comm.) 1926, Aristotle, On Coming-to-Be & Passing-Away, Oxford
Jordan, Z. 1963, ‘Logical Determinism’, NDJFL 4: 1–38Google Scholar
JP = The Journal of Philosophy
JSL = The Journal of Symbolic Logic
Judson, L. 1988, ‘La bataille navale d’aujourd’hui: De Interpretatione 9’, RPA 6: 5–37Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1966, ‘The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being’, Foundations of Language 2: 245–65Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1973a, The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht and Boston
Kahn, C. H. 1973b, ‘On the Terminology for Copula and Existence’ = Stern/Hourani/Brown (1973), 141–58
Kahn, C. H. 1973c, ‘On the Theory of the Verb “To Be”’ = Munitz (1973), 1–20
Kahn, C. H. 1976, ‘Why Existence does not Emerge as a Distinct Concept in Greek Philosophy’, AGPh 58: 323–34Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1978, ‘Questions and Categories: Aristotle's Doctrine of Categories in the Light of Modern Research’ = Hiz (1978), 227–78
Kahn, C. H. 1985, ‘On the Intended Interpretation of Aristotle's Metaphysics’ = Wiesner (1985), 311–38
Kal, V. 1988, On Intuition and Discursive Reasoning in Aristotle, Leiden, New York, Copenhagen, and Cologne
Kapp, E. 1942, Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic, New York
Keeler, L. 1932, ‘Aristotle on the Problem of Error’, Gregorianum 13: 241–60Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (trans. and comm.) 1991, Aristotle, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, New York and Oxford
Kenny, A. 1967, ‘The Argument from Illusion in Aristotle's Metaphysics (Γ, 1009–10)’, Mind 76: 184–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M. 1976, Aristoteles’ Lehre von der Einheit der Definition, Munich
Ketchum, R. J. 1998, ‘Being and Existence in Greek Ontology’, AGPh 80: 321–32Google Scholar
King-Farlow, J. 1958/59, ‘Sea-Fights without Tears’, Analysis 19: 36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, R. L. 1992, Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Kirwan, C. 1986, ‘Aristotle on the Necessity of the Present’, OSAP 4: 167–87Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. (trans. and comm.) 1971/93, Aristotle, Metaphysics: Books Γ, Δ, and Ε, 2nd edn, Oxford
Knabenschuh de Porta, S. 1997, ‘Über die Contingentia Futura und ihre epistemologischen Implikationen’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 189–240
Kneale, M. 1974, rev. of Hintikka (1973), PQ 24: 369–70CrossRef
Kneale, W. C. and Kneale, M. 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford
Kneepkens, C. H. 1994, ‘From Eternal to Perpetual Truths: A Note on the Mediaeval History of Aristotle, De interpretatione, Ch. 1, 16a18’, Vivarium 32: 161–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, S. 1993, Modalities in Medieval Philosophy, London and New York
Knuuttila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.) 1986, The Logic of Being: Historical Studies, Dordrecht
Kraus, O. 1930, introduction and notes to Brentano (1930)
Kreiser, L. 1983, ‘Aristotelischer und Nicht-Aristotelischer Wahrheitsbegriff’ = Irmscher/Müller (1983), 96–9
Krell, D. F. 1975, ‘On the Manifold Meaning of Aletheia: Brentano, Aristotle, Heidegger’, Research in Phenomenology 5: 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1998, ‘Boethius and the Truth about Tomorrow's Sea Battle’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 24–52
Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J. (eds.) 1982, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge
Kullmann, W. 1994/95, ‘Einige Gedanken zur Entwicklung deterministischer Lehren bei den Griechen und zu Aristoteles, De interpretatione 9’, Wiener Studien 107/108: 291–306Google Scholar
Landman, F. 1991, Structures for Semantics, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Lang, P. 1911, De Speusippi Academici scriptis, repr., Hildesheim 1965
Larkin, M. T. 1971, Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle, The Hague and Paris
Lask, E. 1912, Die Lehre vom Urteil = Lask (1923), 283–463
Lask, E. 1923, Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by E. Herrigel, ⅱ, Tübingen
Leal Carretero, F. M. 1983, Der aristotelische Wahrheitsbegriff und die Aufgabe der Semantik, diss. (University of Cologne)
Ledda, G. 1990, ‘Verità e poesia nella Poetica di Aristotele’, Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia – Università di Firenze 6: 3–57Google Scholar
Lemmon, E. J. 1956, rev. of Anscombe (1956/68), JSL 21: 388–9
Lenz, J. W. 1957, ‘Looking Back at the “Sea Fight Tomorrow”’, JP 54: 773–4Google Scholar
León, J. C. 1996, ‘Indeterminism and Future Contingency in Non-Classical Logics’ = Angelelli/Cerezo (1996), 383–95
Leszl, W. 1970, Logic and Metaphysics in Aristotle: Aristotle's Treatment of Types of Equivocity and Its Relevance to His Metaphysical Theories, Padua
Leszl, W. 1971, ‘Metodi di analisi nella filosofia di Aristotele’, Rivista di filosofia 62: 325–53Google Scholar
Leszl, W. 1975, Aristotle's Conception of Ontology, Padua
Lewinsohn, W. 1911, ‘Zur Lehre von Urteil und Verneinung bei Aristoteles’, AGPh 24: 197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, F. A. 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge
Linke, P. F. 1924, ‘Die Existentialtheorie der Wahrheit und der Psychologismus der Geltungslogik’, Kant-Studien 29: 395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, P. F. 1965, ‘Die Unhaltbarkeit des aristotelischen Wahrheitsbegriffs – und die Folgen’, ZPhF 19: 306–19Google Scholar
Linsky, L. 1954, ‘Professor Donald Williams on Aristotle’, PR 63: 250–2Google Scholar
Liske, M.-T. 1985, Aristoteles und der aristotelische Essentialismus: Individuum, Art, Gattung, Freiburg and Munich
Liske, M.-T. 1988, ‘Das veritative “ist” und der logische Atomismus in Platons Theaitetos’, AGPh 70: 147–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liske, M.-T. 1995, ‘In welcher Weise hängen Modalbegriffe und Zeitbegriffe bei Aristoteles zusammen?’, ZPhF 49: 351–77Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. 1981, Form and Universal in Aristotle, Liverpool
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.) 1978, Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge
Long, A. A. 1981, ‘Aristotle and the History of Greek Scepticism’ = O’Meara (1981), 79–106
Loux, M. J. 1991, Primary Ousia: An Essay on Aristotle's Metaphysics Ζ and H, Ithaca and London
Lowe, M. F. 1980, ‘Aristotle on the Sea-Battle: A Clarification’, Analysis 40: 55–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSJ = Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S., A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edn with a revised supplement, Oxford 1996
Lucas, J. R. 1989, The Future: An Essay on God, Temporality, and Truth, Oxford
Lugarini, L. 1955, ‘Il problema delle categorie in Aristotele’, Acme 8: 3–107Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. 1910a, Über den Satz des Widerspruchs bei Aristoteles, trans. by J. Barski, Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York 1993
Lukasiewicz, J. 1910b, ‘Über den Satz des Widerspruchs bei Aristoteles’, Bulletin international de l’Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe de Philosophie et d’Histoire n.n.: 15–38
Lukasiewicz, J. 1918, ‘On Three-Valued Logic’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 87–8
Lukasiewicz, J. 1922, ‘On Determinism’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 110–28
Lukasiewicz, J. 1930, ‘Philosophical Remarks on Many-Valued Systems of Propositional Logic’ = Lukasiewicz (1970), 153–78
Lukasiewicz, J. 1957, Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford
Lukasiewicz, J. 1970, Selected Works, ed. by L. Borkowski, Amsterdam, London, and Warsaw
Luther, W. 1966, ‘Wahrheit, Licht und Erkenntnis in der griechischen Philosophie bis Demokrit. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung des Zusammenhangs von Sprache und philosophischem Denken’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 10: 1–240Google Scholar
Magris, A. 1977, ‘Aristotele e i Megarici. Contributo alla storia del determinismo antico’, Atti dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 111: 113–33Google Scholar
Maier, H. 1896/1936, Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1969
Maier, H. 1899, ‘Die Echtheit der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik’, AGPh 13: 23–72Google Scholar
Manetti, G. (ed.) 1996, Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, Brussels
Mann, J. A. 1958, Existential Import and the Aristotelian Syllogistic, Washington, D.C.
Mansion, A. 1913/45, Introduction à la physique aristotélicienne, 2nd edn, Louvain
Mansion, S. 1946/76, Le jugement d’existence chez Aristote, 2nd edn, Louvain
Mansion, S. (ed.) 1961, Aristote et les problèmes de méthode. Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au 1erseptembre 1960, Louvain and Paris
Margoliouth, D. S. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1911, The Poetics of Aristotle, London
Marrone, L. 1988, ‘Il Mentitore nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni logiche di Crisippo)’ = AA. VV. (1988), 271–6
Marrone, L. 1997, ‘Le Questioni logiche di Crisippo (PHerc 307)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 27: 83–100Google Scholar
Marx, W. 1977, Introduction to Aristotle's Theory of Being as Being, trans. by R. M. Schine, The Hague
Mates, B. 1953/61, Stoic Logic, 2nd edn, Berkeley and Los Angeles
Mattéi, J.-F. (ed.) 1990, La naissance de la raison en Grèce (Actes du Congrès de Nice, mai 1987), Paris
Matthen, M. 1983, ‘Greek Ontology and the “Is” of Truth’, Phronesis 28: 113–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. 1984, ‘Aristotle's Semantics and a Puzzle Concerning Change’ = Pelletier/King-Farlow (1984), 21–40
Matthews, G. B. 1995, ‘Aristotle on Existence’, BICS 42: 233–8Google Scholar
Maurus, S. (trans. and comm.) 1668, Aristotelis Opera quae Extant Omnia …, repr., Paris 1885–86
Mayo, B. 1962/68, ‘The Open Future’ = Gale (1968), 275–91
McArthur, R. P. 1976, Tense Logic, Dordrecht and Boston
McCall, S. 1966, ‘Temporal Flux’, American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 270–81Google Scholar
McGee, V. 1991, Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
McKim, V. R. 1971/72, ‘Fatalism and the Future: Aristotle's Way Out’, RM 25: 80–111Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D., Jr 1992, Principles and Proofs: Aristotle's Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton
Melchiorre, V. (ed.) 2000, I luoghi del comprendere, Milan
Merlan, P. 1953, From Platonism to Neoplatonism, The Hague
Michelis, D. F. 1886, Aristotelis π∊ρὶ νΗρμην∊ίας Librum pro Restituendo Totius Philosophiae Fundamento …, Heidelberg
Mignucci, M. 1975a, L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Commento agli Analitici secondi, Padua
Mignucci, M. 1975b, ‘In margine al concetto aristotelico di esistenza’ = AA. VV. (1975), 227–61
Mignucci, M. 1985a, ‘Temporalità e verità nella filosofia greca’ = AA. VV. (1985), 163–91
Mignucci, M. 1985b, ‘Logic and Omniscience: Alexander of Aphrodisias and Proclus’, OSAP 3: 219–46Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1986, ‘Aristotle's Definitions of Relatives in Cat. 7’, Phronesis 31: 101–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignucci, M. 1989, ‘Truth and Modality in Late Antiquity: Boethius on Future Contingent Propositions’ = Corsi/Mangione/Mugnai (1989), 47–78
Mignucci, M. 1994, ‘Truth and Thought in the De anima’ = Alberti (1994), 137–55
Mignucci, M. 1996a, ‘Vérité et pensée dans le De anima’ = Romeyer Dherbey/Viano (1996), 405–22
Mignucci, M. 1996b, ‘Ammonius on Future Contingent Propositions’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 279–310
Mignucci, M. 1997a, ‘Logica’ = Berti (1997), 47–101
Mignucci, M. 1997b, ‘Remarks on Aristotle's Theory of Predication’ = Günther/Rengakos (1997), 135–51
Mignucci, M. 1998, ‘Ammonius’ Sea Battle’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 53–86
Mignucci, M. 1999a, ‘La critica di Teofrasto alla logica aristotelica’ = Natali/Maso (1999), 21–39
Mignucci, M. 1999b, ‘The Liar Paradox and the Stoics’ = Ierodiakonou (1999), 54–70
Mignucci, M. (trans. and comm.) 1969, Aristotele, Gli Analitici Primi, Naples
Miller, F. D., Jr 1971, Aristotle's Account of Being and Truth, diss. (University of Washington)
Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.) 1949, Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, Oxford
Modrak, D. K. W. 1987, Aristotle: The Power of Perception, Chicago and London
Modrak, D. K. W. 2001, Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning, Cambridge
Moline, J. 1969, ‘Aristotle, Eubulides and the Sorites’, Mind 78: 393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, E. 1984/88, La sezione linguistica del Peri Hermeneias di Aristotele, Florence
Montoneri, M. 1984, I Megarici. Studio storico-critico e traduzione delle testimonianze antiche, Catania
Moore, G. E. 1953, Some Main Problems of Philosophy, London
Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J. (eds.) 1983, Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum: Studien zu einigen Dubia – Akten des 9. Symposium Aristotelicum (Berlin, 7.–16. September 1981), Berlin and New York
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.) 1968, Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, London and Melbourne
Moreau, J. 1961, ‘Aristote et la vérité antéprédicative’ = S. Mansion (1961), 21–33
Morgenstern, A. 2001, ‘Commentary on Crivelli’, BACAP 17: 270–84Google Scholar
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. 1967, Linguistica e stilistica di Aristotele, Rome
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. 1971, ‘Asserzione ed esistenza nella logica di Aristotele’, Filosofia 22: 29–60Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 1985, ‘Separation in Aristotle's Metaphysics’, OSAP 3: 125–57Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 1987, ‘The Evidence for Degrees of Being in Aristotle’, Classical Quarterly 37: 382–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. 1992, ‘The Taxonomical Interpretation of Aristotle's Categories: A Criticism’ = Preus/Anton (1992), 19–46
Movia, G. (trans. and comm.) 1979, Aristotele, L’anima, Naples
Movia, G. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Aristotele, L’anima, Milan
Muckle, J. T. 1933, ‘Isaac Israeli's Definition of Truth’, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Litteraire du Moyen-Age 8: 5–8Google Scholar
Mugler, C. (ed. and trans.) 1966, Aristote, De la génération et de la corruption, Paris
Mulder, D. H. 1996, ‘The Existential Assumptions of Traditional Logic’, HPL 17: 141–54Google Scholar
Munitz, M. K. (ed.) 1973, Logic and Ontology, New York
Natali, C. and Maso, S. (eds.) 1999, Antiaristotelismo, Amsterdam
Natorp, P. 1888, ‘Ueber Aristoteles’ Metaphysik K 1–8, 1065a26’, AGPh 1: 178–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NDJFL = Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
Neale, S. 2001, Facing Facts, Oxford
Negro, G. 1996/97, ‘Alcune note sul vero in Aristotele. L’ ἀλήθ∊ια come isomorfismo di essere e conoscere’, Atti dell’Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti – Classe di Scienze Morali, Lettere ed Arti 155: 335–57Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. 1973, Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam and London
Nussbaum, M. C. and Oksenberg Rorty, A. (eds.) 1992/95, Essays on Aristotle's De anima, 2nd edn, Oxford
Brien, D. 1978, ‘Aristote et la catégorie de quantité: divisions de la quantité’, Les études philosophiques n.n.: 25–40Google Scholar
Oehler, K. 1962/85, Die Lehre vom noetischen und dianoetischen Denken bei Platon und Aristoteles. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Geschichte des Bewusstseinsproblems in der Antike, 2nd edn, Hamburg
Oehler, K. (trans. and comm.) 1984, Aristoteles, Kategorien, Darmstadt
Öffenberger, N. and Vigo, A. G. (eds.) 1997, Südamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik, Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York
O’Meara, D. J. (ed.) 1981, Studies in Aristotle, Washington D.C.
OSAP = Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy
Owen, G. E. L. 1960, ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’ = Düring/Owen (1960), 163–90
Owen, G. E. L. 1965, ‘Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology’ = Bambrough (1965), 69–95
Owen, G. E. L. 1966, ‘The Platonism of Aristotle’, Proceedings of the British Academy 51: 125–50Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1968a, ‘Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms’ = G. E. L. Owen (1968b), 103–25
Owen, G. E. L. 1978/79, ‘Particular and General’, PAS n.s., 79: 1–21Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (ed.) 1968b, Aristotle on Dialectic: the Topics – Papers of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford
Owen, O. F. (trans. and comm.) 1899/1900, Aristotle, The Organon or Logical Treatises, London
Owens, J. 1951/78, The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian ‘Metaphysics’: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, 3rd edn, Toronto
Pacius, J. 1597a, In Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Organum Commentarius Analyticus, repr., Hildesheim 1966
Pacius, J. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1597b, Aristotelis … Organum …, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1967
Pacius, J. 1611, Aristotelis de Anima …, Hannover
Pacius, J. 1623, Aristotelis … Organum …, repr., Frankfurt a. M. 1967
Pagliaro, A. 1954, ‘Il capitolo linguistico della “Poetica” di Aristotele’ = Pagliaro (1956/63), 77–151
Pagliaro, A. 1956/63, Nuovi saggi di critica semantica, 2nd edn, Messina and Florence
Pardey, U. 2000, ‘Verneinen als Absprechen bei Aristoteles oder: Muss man Aristoteles durch die Russellsche Brille lesen?’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 5: 17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAS = Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Patrizi, F. (trans.) 1583, Pseudo-Johannis Philoponi Expositiones in Omnes XIV Aristotelis Libros Metaphysicos, repr., with an intr. by C. Lohr, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt 1991
Patterson, R. 1995, Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne
Patzig, G. 1968, Aristotle's Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philosophical Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics, English ed., trans. by J. Barnes, Dordrecht
Patzig, G. 1973, ‘Aristotle, Lukasiewicz and the Origins of Many-Valued Logic’ = Suppes et al. (1973), 921–9
Pelletier, F. J. and King-Farlow, J. (eds.) 1984, New Essays on Aristotle, Calgary
Percival, P. 1993/94, ‘Absolute Truth’, PAS n.s., 94: 189–213Google Scholar
Pirotta, A. M. (ed.) 1925, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Aristotelis Librum De Anima Commentarium, Turin
Popper, K. R. 1934/59/75, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, English trans., 8th impression, London
Pozzi, L. 1974, Studi di logica antica e medievale, Padua
PQ = The Philosophical Quarterly
PR = The Philosophical Review
Prantl, C. 1855, Geschichte der Logik im Abenlande, ⅰ, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 1997
Preus, A. and Anton, J. P. (eds.) 1992, Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ⅴ, Albany
Prior, A. N. 1953, ‘Three-Valued Logic and Future Contingents’, PQ 3: 317–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. N. 1955/62, Formal Logic, 2nd edn, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1957, Time and Modality, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1967a, Past, Present and Future, Oxford
Prior, A. N. 1967b, ‘Correspondence Theory of Truth’ = Edwards (1967), II 223–32
Prior, A. N. 1967c, ‘Logic, Many-Valued’ = Edwards (1967), V 1–5
Pritzl, K. 1984, ‘The Cognition of Indivisibles and the Argument of De Anima 3.4–8’, ACPA 58: 140–50Google Scholar
Pritzl, K. 1993, ‘Ways of Truth and Ways of Opinion in Aristotle’, ACPA 67: 241–52Google Scholar
Pritzl, K. 1998, ‘Being True in Aristotle's Thinking’, BACAP 14: 177–201, 212Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953, ‘On a Supposed Antinomy’ = Quine (1976), 19–21
Quine, W. V. 1976, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd edn, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Quine, W. V. 1986, Philosophy of Logic, 2nd edn, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Ranulf, S. 1924, Der eleatische Satz vom Widerspruch, Copenhagen, Christiania, London, and Berlin
Reale, G. 1961/67, Il concetto di filosofia prima e l’unità della Metafisica di Aristotele, 3rd edn, Milan
Reale, G. (trans. and comm.) 1968/93, Aristotele, Metafisica, 2nd edn, Milan
Rees, D. A. 1960, ‘Language, Logic and Reality in Aristotle and Russell’ = AA. VV. (1960), 137–43
Régis, L.-M. 1935, L’opinion selon Aristote, Paris and Ottawa
Remes, U. 1977, ‘Aristotle's Sea-Fight Discussion against its Background in the Topics’, Ajatus 37: 41–7Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1963a, Studies in the History of Arabic Logic, Pittsburgh
Rescher, N. 1963b, ‘An Interpretation of Aristotle's Doctrine of Future Contingency and Excluded Middle’ = Rescher (1963a), 43–54
Rescher, N. 1968, ‘Truth and Necessity in Temporal Perspective’ = Gale (1968), 183–220
Ringbom, M. 1972, ‘Thoughts and Facts: An Aristotelian Problem’, Ajatus 34: 7–25Google Scholar
Riondato, E. 1957a, La teoria aristotelica dell’enunciazione, Padua
Riondato, E. (trans. and comm.) 1957b, Aristotele, De interpretatione, Padua
RM = The Review of Metaphysics
Rodier, G. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1900, Aristote, Traité de lâme, Paris
Roeper, G. 1852, ‘Zu Aristoteles de anima’, Philologus 7: 324, 768Google Scholar
Rolfes, E. (trans. and comm.) 1904/28, Aristoteles, Metaphysik, 3rd edn, Leipzig
Romeyer Dherbey, G. and Viano, C. (eds.) 1996, Corps et âme. Sur le De anima d’Aristote, Paris
Rose, L. E. 1968, Aristotle's Syllogistic, Springfield, Ill
Rosen, S. H. 1961, ‘Thought and Touch: A Note on Aristotle's De Anima’, Phronesis 6: 127–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1923, Aristotle, 6th edn, London and New York 1995
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1924, Aristotle, Metaphysics, repr., Oxford 1975
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1949, Aristotle, Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1956, Aristotelis de Anima, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed.) 1958, Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (ed. and comm.) 1961, Aristotle, De Anima, Oxford
Ross, W. D. (trans.) 1908, Aristotle, Metaphysica, Oxford
Rostagni, A. (ed. and comm.) 1927, La Poetica di Aristotele, Turin
RPA = Revue de Philosophie Ancienne
Russell, B. 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, repr., Oxford and New York 1991
Russo, A. (trans.) 1973/82, Aristotele, Metafisica, 2nd edn, Rome and Bari
Rüstow, A. 1910, Der Lügner. Theorie, Geschichte und Auflösung, repr., New York and London 1987
Sadun Bordoni, G. 1994, Linguaggio e realtà in Aristotele, Rome and Bari
Sainati, V. 1968, Storia dell’ ‘Organon’ aristotelico, ⅰ, Florence
Salmeri, G. (trans. and comm.) 1996, Aristotele, Discorsi sull’esistenza. Libri 7-8-9 della Metafisica, Cinisello Balsamo
Saunders, J. T. 1958, ‘A Sea Fight Tomorrow?’, PR 67: 367–78Google Scholar
Sayward, C. 1989, ‘Does the Law of Excluded Middle Require Bivalence?’, Erkenntnis 31: 129–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpat, G. 1950, Il discorso e le sue parti in Aristotele, Arona
Schiaparelli, A. 1999a, ‘L’ambiguità in Aristotele e in Galeno’ = Natali/Maso (1999), 143–66
Schiaparelli, A. 1999b, ‘L’influenza della Retorica di Aristotele in età imperiale. L’importanza di essere chiaramente ambigui’, Méthexis 12: 53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. G. 1966, ‘Alexander von Aphrodisias in einem altarmenischen Kategorien-Kommentar’, Philologus 110: 277–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1985, Die Ideenlehre des Aristoteles, ⅰ.ⅱ, Bonn
Schofield, M. and Craven Nussbaum, M. (eds.) 1982, Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, Cambridge
Scholz, H. 1959, Abriss der Geschichte der Logik, 2nd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Schuhl, P. M. 1960, Le dominateur et les possibles, Paris
Schulz, G. 1993, Veritas est Adaequatio Intellectus et Rei: Untersuchungen zur Wahrheitslehre des Thomas von Aquin und zur Kritik Kants an einem überlieferten Wahrheitsbegriff, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Schwegler, A. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1847/48, Aristoteles, Die Metaphysik, repr., Frankfurt a. M. 1968
Scott, T. K. (trans.) 1966, John Buridan, Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, New York
Scott, T. K. (ed.) 1977, J. Buridanus, Sophismata, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstat
Sedley, D. 1996, ‘Aristotle's de Interpretatione and Ancient Semantics’ = G. Manetti (1996), 87–108
Seel, G. 1982a, Die aristotelische Modaltheorie, Berlin and New York
Seel, G. 1982b, ‘Diodore domine-t-il-Aristote?’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 87: 293–313Google Scholar
Seel, G. 2001a, ‘Ammonius’ Semantics of the Assertoric Sentence’ = Seel (2001b), 213–33
Seel, G. (ed.) 2001b, Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary, and Essays, Berlin and New York
Seeskin, K. R. 1971, ‘Many-Valued Logic and Future Contingencies’, Logique et Analyse 14: 759–73Google Scholar
Segalerba, G. 2001, Note su Ousia, ⅰ, Pisa
Seidl, H. 1971, Der Begriff des Intellekts (νοῦς) bei Aristoteles im philosophischen Zusammenhang seiner Hauptschriften, Meisenheim am Glan
Seidl, H. (trans. and comm.) 1989/91, Aristoteles’ Metaphysik, 3rd edn, Hamburg
Sepich, J. R. 1953, ‘La noción de verdad en el libro IX capitulo 10 de la Metafisica de Aristóteles’ = AA. VV. (1953), ⅻ 107–8
Sharples, R. W. 1979, ‘“If What Is Earlier, then Of Necessity What Is Later”? Some Ancient Discussions of Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione 2.11’, BICS 26: 27–44Google Scholar
Shields, C. 1999, Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle, Oxford
Sillitti, G. 1966, ‘I “Fondamenti della logica aristotelica” e la critica di Emanuele Severino’ = Calogero (1927/68), 313–25
Sillitti, G. 1968, ‘Il non ente tra Platone e Aristotele’, La cultura 6: 474–88Google Scholar
Simons, P. 1987, Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford
Simons, P. 1988, ‘Aristotle's Concept of State of Affairs’ = Gigon/Fischer (1988), 97–112
Simpson, P. 1981, ‘Aristotle's Theory of Assertions: A Reply to William Jacobs’, Phronesis 26: 84–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siwek, P. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1965, Aristotelis Tractatus de Anima Graece et Latine, Rome
Skarica, M. 1997, ‘Anmerkungen zum Kommentar von Boethius zu De Interpretatione 9 von Aristoteles’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 182–8
Slomkowski, P. 1997, Aristotle's Topics, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Smith, R. (trans. and comm.) 1989, Aristotle, Prior Analytics, Indianapolis, Ind. and Cambridge, Mass
Smith, R. (trans. and comm.) 1997, Aristotle, Topics: Books I and VIII with Excerpts from Related Texts, Oxford
Sommers, F. 1969/70, ‘On Concepts of Truth in Natural Languages’, RM 23: 259–86Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980, Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory, London
Sorabji, R. 1981, ‘Definitions: Why Necessary, and in What Way?’ = Berti (1981), 205–44
Sorabji, R. 1982, ‘Myths about Non-Propositional Thought’ = Schofield/Craven Nussbaum (1982), 295–314
Sorabji, R. 1983, Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, London
Sorabji, R. 1988, Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel, London
Sorabji, R. 1992, ‘Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle's Theory of Sense-Perception’ = Nussbaum/Oksenberg Rorty (1992/95), 195–225
Sorabji, R. 1996, ‘Rationality’ = Frede/Striker (1996), 311–34
Sorabji, R. 1998, ‘The Three Deterministic Arguments Opposed by Ammonius’ = Blank/Kretzmann (1998), 3–15
Soreth, M. 1973, ‘Zum infiniten Prädikat im zehnten Kapitel der aristotelischen Hermeneutik’ = Stern/Hourani/Brown (1973), 389–424
Spade, P. V. 1973, ‘The Origins of the Mediaeval Insolubilia Literature’, Franciscan Studies 33: 292–309Google Scholar
Spade, P. V. 1982, ‘Insolubilia’ = Kretzmann/Kenny/Pinborg (1982), 246–53
Spade, P. V. 1987, ‘Five Early Theories in the Mediaeval Insolubilia-Literature’, Vivarium 25: 24–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellman, L. 1980, ‘DI 9: An Exegetical Stalemate’, Apeiron 14: 115–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiazzi, R. M. (ed.) 1964, S. Thomae Aquinatis in Aristotelis Libros Peri Hermeneias et Posteriorum Analyticorum Expositio, 2nd edn, Turin
Srzednicki, J. 1965, Franz Brentano's Analysis of Truth, The Hague
Steinthal, H. 1863/90, Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik, 2nd edn, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 2001
Stenzel, J. 1931, Metaphysik des Altertums, Munich and Berlin
Stern, S. M., Hourani, A., and Brown, V. (eds.) 1973, Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented by His Friends and Pupils to Richard Walzer, Columbia, SC
Stough, C. L. 1972, ‘Language and Ontology in Aristotle's Categories’, JHP 10: 261–72Google Scholar
Strache, I. and Wallies, M. (eds.) 1923, Aristotelis Topica cum Libro de Sophisticis Elenchis, Leipzig
Strang, C. 1960, ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle’, Mind 69: 447–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950, ‘Truth’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 162–82
Strobach, N. 1998, ‘Logik für die Seeschlacht – mögliche Spielzüge’, ZPhF 52: 105–19Google Scholar
Suarez, F. 1597, Disputationes Metaphysicae, repr., Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York 1998
Sugihara, T. 1954, rev. of Prior (1953), JSL 19: 294Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. 1970, ‘What Was True or False in the Old Logic?’, JP 67: 788–800Google Scholar
Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., and Moisil, G. C. (eds.) 1973, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Bucharest, 1971, Amsterdam, London, and New York
Szaif, J. 1998, Platons Begriff der Wahrheit, 3rd edn, Freiburg and Munich
Szaniawski, K. (ed.) 1989, The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Talanga, J. 1986, Zukunftsurteile und Fatum: Eine Untersuchung über Aristoteles’ De interpretatione 9 und Ciceros De fato, mit einem Überblick über die spätantiken Heimarmene-Lehren, Bonn
Tarski, A. 1933, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ = Tarski (1956/83), 152–278
Tarski, A. 1944, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’ = Blackburn/Simmons (1999), 115–43
Tarski, A. 1956/83, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, trans. by J. H. Woodger, 2nd edn, ed. by J. Corcoran, Indianapolis, Ind
Tarski, A. 1969, ‘Truth and Proof’ = Hughes (1993), 101–25
Taylor, K. 1998, Truth and Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford
Taylor, R. 1957, ‘The Problem of Future Contingencies’, PR 66: 1–28Google Scholar
Textor, A. 1870, De Hermeniae Aristoteleae capitibus I–XI, diss., Berlin
Theiler, W. (trans. and comm.) 1959, Aristoteles, Über die Seele, Darmstadt
Thom, P. 1981, The Syllogism, Munich
Thom, P. 2002, ‘On the Pervasiveness of Being’ = Caston/Graham (2002), 293–301
Thomason, R. H. 1970, ‘Indeterminist Time and Truth-Value Gaps’, Theoria 36: 264–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, R. H. 1984, ‘Combinations of Tense and Modality’ = Gabbay/Guenthner (1983/89), II 135–65
Thompson, M. 1953/68, ‘On Aristotle's Square of Opposition’ = Moravcsik (1968), 51–72
Thornton, A. M. 1986, ‘Λόγος-phrase et λόγος-texte chez Platon et Aristote’ = AA. VV. (1986), 165–79
Thorp, J. 2001, ‘“Being in the Strictest Sense”: Aristotle on Truth, Reality and Existence’, unpublished typescript
Torstrik, A. (ed. and comm.) 1862, Aristotelis de Anima Libri III, Berlin
Tredennick, H. (ed. and trans.) 1933, Aristotle, The Metaphysics, Cambridge, Mass. and London
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1836/92, Elementa Logices Aristoteleae, 9th edn, Berlin
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1846, Geschichte der Kategorienlehre, Berlin
Trendelenburg, F. A. 1876, Elemente der aristotelischen Logik, 3rd edn, repr., Munich 1967
Trendelenburg, F. A. (ed. and comm.) 1833, Aristotelis de Anima Libri Tres, Jena
Trendelenburg, F. A. (ed. and comm.) 1877, Aristotelis de Anima Libri Tres, 2nd edn, Berlin
Trenkner, S. 1952/53, ‘Aristotle, Rhetoric ⅲ, 12, 4’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s., 2: 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricot, J. (trans. and comm.) 1966, Aristote, La métaphysique, 2nd edn, Paris
Trundle, R. 1981, ‘De Interpretatione IX: The Problem of Future Truth or of Infinite Past Truth?’, The Modern Schoolman 59: 49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, E. 1956/88, ΤΙ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΙΝΟΣ: Eine Untersuchung zu Struktur und Ursprung aristotelischer Grundbegriffe, 4th edn, Freiburg and Munich
Tugendhat, E. 1966a, ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Aristoteles’ = Tugendhat (1992), 251–60
Tugendhat, E. 1966b, rev. of Oehler (1962/85) = Tugendhat (1992), 402–13
Tugendhat, E. 1992, Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt a. M
Ueberweg, F. 1868, System der Logik und Geschichte der logischen Lehren, 3rd edn, Bonn
Upton, T. V. 1988, ‘Aristotle on Existence: Escaping the Snares of Ontology?’, The New Scholasticism 62: 373–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, T. V. 1991, ‘The If-It-Is Question in Aristotle’, AP 11: 315–30Google Scholar
Vahlen, I. 1872, ‘Über eine Stelle in Aristoteles’ Schrift von der Seele’, Sitzungberichte der Wiener Akademie – Phil.-Hist. Cl. 71: 419–34Google Scholar
Vahlen, I. (ed. and comm.) 1885, Aristotelis de Arte Poetica Liber, 3rd edn, repr., Hildesheim 1964
Bennekom, R. 1975, ‘The Definitions of Σύνδ∊σμος and ἊἌρθρον in Aristotle, Poetics Ch. 20’, Mnemosyne 28: 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennekom, R. 1986, ‘Aristotle and the Copula’, JHP 24: 1–18Google Scholar
Eck, J. A. 1988, ‘Another Interpretation of Aristotle's De Interpretatione IX: A Support for the So-Called Second Oldest or “Mediaeval” Interpretation’, Vivarium 26: 19–38Google Scholar
Fraassen, B. C. 1966, ‘Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic’, JP 63: 481–95Google Scholar
van Raalte, M. (trans. and comm.) 1993, Theophrastus, Metaphysics, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
van Rijen, J. 1989, Aspects of Aristotle's Logic of Modalities, Dordrecht, Boston, and London
Vasiliou, I. 1996, ‘Perception, Knowledge, and the Sceptic in Aristotle’, OSAP 14: 83–131Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (ed.) 1966, Jean Philopon, Commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote, trans. by William of Moerbeke, Louvain and Paris
Viano, C. A. 1955, La logica di Aristotele, Turin
Viano, C. A. (trans. and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, La metafisica, Turin
Vigo, A. G. 1994, ‘Wahrheit, Logos und Praxis. Die Transformation der aristotelischen Wahrheitskonzeption durch Heidegger’, Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1: 73–95Google Scholar
Vigo, A. G. 1997, ‘Der theoretische Wahrheitsbegriff bei Aristoteles. Versuch einer systematischen Rekonstruktion’ = Öffenberger/Vigo (1997), 1–48
Volkmann-Schluck, K.-H. 1979, Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, Frankfurt a. M
Vollrath, G. E. 1959, Studien zur Kategorienlehre des Aristoteles, diss. (University of Cologne)
von Fragstein, A. 1967, Die Diairesis bei Aristoteles, Amsterdam
Fritz, K. 1962, rev. of Schuhl (1960), Gnomon 34: 138–52Google Scholar
Fritz, K. 1972, rev. of D. Frede (1970), Gnomon 44: 241–50Google Scholar
Ivánka, E. 1932, ‘Die Behandlung der Metaphysik in Jaegers “Aristoteles”’, Scholastik 7: 1–29Google Scholar
von Kirchmann, J. H. 1876, Erläuterungen zu den Kategorien und den Hermeneutiken des Aristoteles, Leipzig
von Kirchmann, J. H. 1883, Erläuterungen zu Aristoteles’ Sophistischen Widerlegungen, Leipzig
Kutschera, F. 1986, ‘Zwei modallogische Argumente für den Determinismus: Aristoteles und Diodor’, Erkenntnis 24: 203–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, G. H. 1974, ‘Determinismus, Wahrheit und Zeitlichkeit. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der zukünftigen kontingenten Wahrheiten’, Studia Leibnitiana 6: 161–78Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. 1979, ‘Time, Truth and Necessity’ = Diamond/Teichmann (1979), 237–50
von Wright, G. H. 1984a, Truth, Knowledge, and Modality, Oxford
von Wright, G. H. 1984b, ‘Determinism and Future Truth’ = von Wright (1984a), 1–13
von Wright, G. H. 1984c, ‘“Omne quod est quando est necesse est esse”’ = von Wright (1984a), 72–85
Vuillemin, J. 1996, Necessity or Contingency: The Master Argument, Stanford
Vuillemin-Diem, G. (ed.) 1995, Aristoteles, Metaphysica, trans. by William of Moerbeke, Leiden, New York, and Cologne
Wagner, H. 1961/62, ‘Über das Aristotelische πολλαχῶς λέγ∊ται τὸ ὄν’, Kant-Studien 53: 75–91Google Scholar
Waitz, T. 1857, ‘Varianten zu Aristoteles Organon’, Philologus 12: 726–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waitz, T. (ed. and comm.) 1844/46, Aristoteles, Organon Graece, Leipzig
Wallace, E. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1882, Aristotle's Psychology, Cambridge
Wardy, R. 1990, The Chain of Change: A Study of Aristotle's Physics VII, Cambridge
Warrington, J. (trans.) 1956, Aristotle, Metaphysics, London and New York
Waterlow, S. 1982, Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts, Oxford
Wedin, M. V. 1978, ‘Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences’, Phronesis 23: 179–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, M. V. 1988, Mind and Imagination in Aristotle, New Haven and London
Wedin, M. V. 1990, ‘Negation and Quantification in Aristotle’, HPL 11: 131–50Google Scholar
Wedin, M. V. 2000, Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta, Oxford
Weidemann, H. 1979, ‘Möglichkeit und Wahrheit. Oskar Beckers modale Grundfigur und das Aristotelische Bivalenzprinzip’, AGPh 61: 22–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidemann, H. 1980, ‘Überlegungen zu einer temporalen Modalanalyse’, ZPhF 34: 405–22Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. 1985, ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zum siebten Kapitel der aristotelischen “Hermeneutik”. Int. 7, 17b12–16/16–20’ = Wiesner (1985), 45–56
Weidemann, H. 1987, ‘Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit bei Aristoteles’, Studia Philosophica (Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Philosophischen Gesellschaft) 46: 171–89Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (trans. and comm.) 1994/2002, Aristoteles, Peri Hermeneias, 2nd edn, Berlin
Weingartner, P. 1978, ‘Brentano's Criticism of the Correspondence Theory of Truth and of the Principle “Ens et Verum Convertuntur”’ = Chisholm/Haller (1978), 183–95
Weise, C. H. (ed.) 1843, Aristotelis Opera Omnia Quae Extant …, Leipzig
Wheeler, M. 1999, ‘Semantics in Aristotle's Organon’, JHP 37: 191–226Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996, Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic, Oxford
White, A. R. 1970, Truth, London and Basingstoke
White, M. J. 1979, ‘Aristotle and Temporally Relative Modalities’, Analysis 39: 88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1980, ‘Necessity and Unactualized Possibilities in Aristotle’, Philosophical Studies 38: 287–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1981, ‘Fatalism and Causal Determinism: An Aristotelian Essay’, PQ 31: 231–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1985, Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, and Tokyo
Wieland, W. 1962, Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles, Göttingen
Wieland, W. 1972, ‘Zeitliche Kausalstrukturen in der aristotelischen Logik’, AGPh 54: 229–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, W. 1979, ‘Aristoteles und die Seeschlacht. Zur Struktur prognostischer Aussagen’, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 2: 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner, J. (ed.) 1985, Aristoteles – Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, ⅰ, Berlin and New York
Wildberg, C. 1989, ‘Two Systems in Aristotle?’, OSAP 7: 193–202Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1976, What is Truth?, Cambridge
Williams, C. J. F. 1978, ‘True Tomorrow, Never True Today’, PQ 28: 285–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1980, ‘What Is, Necessarily Is, When It Is’, Analysis 40: 127–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1981, What is Existence?, Oxford
Williams, C. J. F. 1991, ‘Aristotle and Copernican Revolutions’, Phronesis 36: 305–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. (trans. and comm.) 1982, Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione, Oxford
Williams, D. C. 1951, ‘The Sea Fight Tomorrow’ = Henle/Kallen/Langer (1951), 282–306
Williams, D. C. 1954, ‘Professor Linsky on Aristotle’, PR 63: 253–5Google Scholar
Williams, K. J. 1978, ‘Aristotle's Theory of Truth’, Prudentia 10: 67–76Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1994, Vagueness, London and New York
Wilpert, P. 1940, ‘Zum aristotelischen Wahrheitsbegriff’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 53: 3–16Google Scholar
Wilpert, P. 1949, Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre, Regensburg
Wlodarczyk, M. 2000, ‘Aristotelian Dialectic and the Discovery of Truth’, OSAP 18: 153–210Google Scholar
Wolenski, J. and Simons, P. 1989, ‘De Veritate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski’ = Szaniawski (1989), 391–442
Wolf, U. 1979, Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit bei Aristoteles und heute, Munich
Wolff, F. 1999, ‘Proposition, être et vérité. Aristote ou Antisthène? (À propos de Métaphysique Δ, 29)’ = Büttgen/Diebler/Rashed (1999), 43–63
Xenakis, J. 1957, ‘Aristotle on Truth-Value’, The New Scholasticism 31: 538–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yourgrau, P. 1985, ‘On the Logic of Indeterminist Time’, JP 82: 548–59Google Scholar
Zadro, A. 1979, Tempo ed enunciati nel ‘de interpretatione’ di Aristotele, Padua
Zadro, A. (trans. and comm.) 1974, Aristotele, I topici, Naples
Zadro, A. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1999, Aristotele, De interpretatione, Naples
Zagzebski, L. T. 1991, The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge, New York and Oxford
Zanatta, M. (trans. and comm.) 1992, Aristotele, Della interpretazione, Milan
Zanatta, M. 1995, Aristotele, Le confutazioni sofistiche, Milan
Zaslawsky, D. 1982, Analyse de l’être. Essai de philosophie analytique, Paris
Zaslawsky, D. 1986, ‘Paradoxes linguistiques: A propos de Νέξις chez Aristote’ = AA. VV. (1986), 239–61
Zell, C. (ed., trans., and comm.) 1820, Aristotelis Ethicorum Nicomacheorum Libri Decem, Heidelberg
Zeller, E. 1921, Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, ⅱ.ⅱ, 5th edn, Hildesheim 1963
Zimmermann, F. W. (trans. and comm.) 1981, Alfarabi, Commentary and Treatise on Aristotle's de Interpretatione, Oxford
ZPhhF = Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paolo Crivelli
  • Book: Aristotle on Truth
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482496.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paolo Crivelli
  • Book: Aristotle on Truth
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482496.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paolo Crivelli
  • Book: Aristotle on Truth
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482496.016
Available formats
×