Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:27:22.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Metacognition in older adults: implications for application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Christopher Hertzog
Edited by
Timothy J. Perfect  and
Bennett L. Schwartz
Christopher Hertzog
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
Get access

Summary

Metacognition is a construct that has received considerable attention in developmental psychology, including psychological gerontology – the science of aging. As I treat it here, metacognition is a broad umbrella term that covers several related constructs: knowledge about cognition, beliefs (both about oneself and about cognition in general), and monitoring (Hertzog and Hultsch, 2000). Much of the emphasis in studies of aging and metacognition has been placed on the role of beliefs about memory and aging, both in oneself and others, and how those beliefs may influence beliefs about one's own cognitive functioning. Traditionally, beliefs have played less of a role in research by experimental psychologists interested in metacognition. This line of theory and research has typically focused on processes of awareness and judgment concerning the status of the cognitive system, concentrating on the constructs of monitoring and control achieved via utilization of monitoring (e.g. Nelson, 1996). This state of affairs seems to be changing, as scientists interested in metacognition have begun to consider the potential importance of constructs such as causal attributions in explaining the accuracy or inaccuracy of measures of monitoring (e.g. Koriat, Goldsmith, and Pansky, 2000).

The construct of metacognition has appeared in a wide variety of theoretical treatments of cognition, including theories of intelligence and problem solving (e.g. Davidson and Sternberg, 1998). For the purposes of this chapter, I focus more narrowly on the domains of learning and memory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Applied Metacognition , pp. 169 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen-Burge, R., and Storandt, M. (2000). Age equivalence in feeling-of-knowing experiences. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B, P214–P223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., and Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, D. L., Hamlett, K. W., and Davis, S. W. (1992). Memory complaint and memory performance in the elderly: the effects of memory-skills training and expectancy change. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieman-Copland, S., and Charness, N. (1994). Memory knowledge and memory monitoring in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 9, 287–302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolla, K. I., Lindgren, K. N., Bonaccorsy, C., and Bleeker, M. L. (1991). Memory complaints in older adults: fact or fiction?Archives of Neurology, 48, 61–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, D. (1985). The how and why of ecological memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, E. C., Nelson, T. O., and Peck, V. (1988). Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing. Developmental Psychology, 24, 654–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, C. J., Foss, J. W., O'Hanlon, A. M., and Stevens, A. B. (1996). Memory interventions for persons with dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 193–2103.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprio-Prevette, M. D., and Fry, P. S. (1996). Memory enhancement program for community-based older adults: development and evaluation. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 281–303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanaugh, J. C., Feldman, J., and Hertzog, C. (1998). Memory beliefs as social cognition: a reconceptualization of what memory questionnaires assess. Review of General Psychology, 2, 48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, J. C., Grady, J., and Perlmutter, M. (1983). Forgetting and use of memory aids in 20- and 70-year olds’ everyday life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17, 113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalfonte, B. L., and Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 24, 403–416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. (1993). Memory and aging. In G. M. Davies and R. H. Logie (eds.), Memory in everyday life, pp. 419–438. Amsterdam: ElsevierCrossRef
Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 50–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, S. J., and Hodgson, L. G. (1996). Anticipatory dementia: a link between memory appraisals and concerns about developing Alzheimer's disease. The Gerontologist, 36, 657–664CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, H. A., Dixon, R. A., and Hultsch, D. F. (1991). Memory anxiety and memory performance in adulthood. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. E., and Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: how metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 47–68. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Devolder, P. A., and Pressley, M. (1992). Causal attributions and strategy use in relation to memory performance differences in younger and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlosky, J., and Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 25, 691–700CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (1997). Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multi-trial learning. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52, 178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 249–275. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about strategy effectiveness: a componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462–474CrossRef
Dunlosky, J., Kubat-Silman, A., and Hertzog, C. (2002). Training metacognitive skills improves older adults’ associative learning. Unpublished manuscript
Dunlosky, J., and Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic–extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1180–1191Google ScholarPubMed
Dunlosky, J., and Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 374–380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
Elliott, E., and Lachman, M. E. (1989). Enhancing memory by modifying control beliefs, attributions, and performance goals in the elderly. In P. S. Fry (ed.), Psychological perspective of helplessness and control in the elderly, pp. 339–367. Amsterdam: North Holland
Erber, J. T., and Prager, I. G. (1999). Age and memory: perceptions of forgetful young and older adults. In T. M. Hess and F. Blanchard-Fields (eds.), Social cognition and aging, pp. 197–217. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Fisher, D. L. (1996). State models of paired associate learning: the general acquisition, decrement, and training hypotheses. In W. A. Rogers, A. D. Fisk, and N. Walker (eds.), Aging and skilled performance: advances in theory and applications, pp. 17–43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Fisher, R. P., and Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas
Gilewski, M. J., and Zelinski, E. M. (1986). Questionnaire assessment of memory complaints. In L. W. Poon, T. Crook, K. L. Davis, C. Eisdorfer, B. J. Gurland, A. W. Kaszniak, and L. W. Thompson (eds.), Handbook for clinical memory assessment of older adults, pp. 93–107. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Gilewski, M. J., Zelinski, E. M., and Schaie, K. W. (1990). The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age. Psychology and Aging, 5, 482–490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., and Sykes, R. N. (1991). The obituary on everyday memory and its practical application is premature. American Psychologist, 46, 76–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J., Dixon, R. A., and Baltes, P. B. (1989). Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., and DeLeonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Know thy memory: the use of questionnaires to assess and study memory. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 434–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, D., Johnson, M., McEvoy, C., Hertzog, C., and Hertel, P. (eds.) (1996). Basic and applied memory: theory in context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., and Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 215–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzog, C., and Hultsch, D. F. (2000). Metacognition in adulthood and aging. In T. Salthouse and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition, 2nd edition, pp. 417–466. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hertzog, C., Hultsch, D. F., and Dixon, R. A. (1989). Evidence for the convergent validity of two self-report metamemory questionnaires. Developmental Psychology, 25, 687–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Powell-Moman, A., and Dunlosky, J. (2002). Aging and monitoring associative learning: is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired?Psychology and Aging, 17, 209–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzog, C., McGuire, C. L., and Lineweaver, T. T. (1998). Aging, attributions, perceived control, and strategy use in a free recall task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C., McGuire, C. L., and Lineweaver, T. T. (1999). Beliefs about memory and aging. In F. Blanchard-Fields and T. M. Hess (eds.), Social cognition and aging, pp. 43–68. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Hertzog, C., Lineweaver, T. T., and Powell-Moman, A. (2001). Implicit theories of aging and memory: a potent influence on beliefs about changes in one's own memory? Unpublished manuscript
Hertzog, C., Park, D. C., Morrell, R. W., and Martin, M. (2000). Ask and ye shall receive: behavioral specificity in the accuracy of subjective memory complaints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 257–2753.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C., York, A. R., and Baldi, R. A. (2001). New measures of implicit theories about memory and aging. Paper presented at the 13th Annual American Psychological Society Conference, Toronto, Ontario
Hill, R. D., Sheikh, J. I., and Yesavage, J. A. (1988). Pretraining enhances mnemonic training in elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 14, 207–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hummert, M. L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: a comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intons-Peterson, M. J., and Fournier, J. (1986). External and internal memory aids: when and how often do we use them?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3–22Google ScholarPubMed
Jobe, J., and Mingay, D. J. (1991). Cognition and survey measurement: history and overview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kausler, D. H. (1994). Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Kelemen, W. L. (2000). Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: judging what you know and what you will know. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 800–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cued-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., and Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwong See, S. T., Hoffman, H. G., and Wood, T. L. (2001). Perceptions of an old female eyewitness: is the older eyewitness believable?Psychology and Aging, 16, 346–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwong See, S. T., and Ryan, E. B. (1999). Intergenerational communication: the survey interview as a social exchange. In N. Schwarz, D. Park, B. Knäuper, and S. Sudman (eds.), Cognition, aging, and self-reports, pp. 245–262. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology PressCrossRef
Lachman, J. L., Lachman, R., and Thronesbery, C. (1979). Metamemory through the adult lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 15, 543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachman, M. E., Bandura, M., Weaver, S. L., and Elliott, E. (1995). Assessing memory control beliefs: the Memory Controllability Inventory. Aging and Cognition, 2, 67–84Google Scholar
Lachman, M. E., Steinberg, E. S., and Trotter, S. D. (1987). Effects of control beliefs and attributions on memory self-assessments and performance. Psychology and Aging, 2, 266–271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachman, M. E., Weaver, S. L., Bandura, M., Elliott, E., and Lewkowicz, C. J. (1992). Improving memory and control beliefs through cognitive restructuring and self-generated strategies. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, P293–P299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, C. J., and Zelinski, E. M. (in press). Longitudinal hierarchical linear models of the memory functioning questionnaire. Psychology and Aging
Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Larrabee, G. J., and West, R. L. (1991). The association of memory complaint with computer-simulated everyday memory performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 466–478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092–1107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lineweaver, T. T., and Hertzog, C. (1998). Adults’ efficacy and control beliefs regarding memory and aging: separating general from personal beliefs. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 264–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, E. A. (1990). Aging and metacognitions concerning memory function. In E. A. Lovelace (ed.), Aging and cognition: mental processes, self awareness, and interventions, pp. 157–188. Amsterdam: North HollandCrossRef
Lynch, S. M. (2000). Measurement and prediction of aging anxiety. Research on Aging, 22, 533–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory and Cognition, 26, 959–964CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marquié, J. C., and Huet, N. (2000). Age differences in feeling-of-knowing and confidence judgments as a function of knowledge domain. Psychology and Aging, 15, 451–461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald-Miszczak, L., Hertzog, C., and Hultsch, D. F. (1995). Stability and accuracy of metamemory in adulthood and aging: a longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 553–564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, C., Ross, M., and Giltrow, M. (1992). Biased recollections in older adults: the role of implicit theories of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 837–850CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, C. L. (2001). Memory monitoring intervention for healthy older adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology
Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Gabriesheski, A. S., and Schmitt, F. A. (1981). Metamemory in the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 185–193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. D., Schmitt, F. A., Caruso, M. J., and Sanders, R. E. (1987). Metamemory in older adults: the role of monitoring in serial recall. Psychology and Aging, 2, 331–339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. O., and Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “delayed-JOL effect.”Psychological Science, 2, 267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederehe, G., and Yoder, C. (1989). Metamemory perceptions in depressions of older and younger adults. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Leventhal, H., Morrell, R. W., Leventhal, E., Birchmore, D., Martin, M., and Bennett, J. (1999). Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: older is wiser. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 47, 172–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlmutter, M. (1978). What is memory aging the aging of?Developmental Psychology, 14, 330–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A., and Abson, V. (1990). “Lost and found”: some logical and methodological limitations of self-report questionnaires as tools to study cognitive aging. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbitt, P., Maylor, E., McInnes, L., Bent, N., and Moore, B. (1995). What goods can self-assessment questionnaires deliver for cognitive gerontology?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, S127–S152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., Ackerman, B. P., and Hinchley, J. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: the roles of relatedness and imagery. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 688–695CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rediess, S., and Caine, E. D. (1996). Aging, cognition, and DSM-Ⅳ. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 3, 105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., and Kwong See, S. T. (1993). Age-based beliefs about memory changes for self and others across adulthood. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P108–P118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, F. A., Murphy, M. D., and Sanders, R. E. (1981). Training older adult free recall rehearsal strategies. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 329–337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Son, L. K., and Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221Google ScholarPubMed
Stigsdotter, A., and Bäckman, L. (1989). Multifactorial memory training with older adults: how to foster maintenance of improved performance. Gerontology, 35, 260–267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigsdotter Neely, A., and Bäckman, L. (1993). Long-term maintenance of gains from memory training in older adults: two 3⅗year follow-up studies. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P233–P237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, A., Watts, K., Baddeley, A. D., and Harris, J. E. (1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 376–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiede, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 662–667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiede, K. W., and Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S. Jr., and Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322–359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yesavage, J. L., and Rose, T. L. (1984). Semantic elaboration and the method of loci: a new trip for older learners. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 155–159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×