Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-gsnzm Total loading time: 1.021 Render date: 2022-10-04T07:14:38.611Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2017

George Karamanolis
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Vasilis Politis
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic Probabilism and Stoic Epistemology’, Classical Quarterly 44: 85113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (1997) ‘Carneadean Argument in Cicero’s Academic Books’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 217–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. E. (1997) Plato’s Parmenides, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. (1969) ‘Socratic Reasoning in the “Euthyphro”’, Review of Metaphysics 22: 461–81.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1992) ‘Plato the Sceptic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues, Supplementary Volume: 43–72.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2011) ‘Ancient Scepticism and Ancient Religion’, in Morrison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc. Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7590.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (2000) Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195264.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. (1967) ‘Plotinus’, in Armstrong, H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1961a) ‘Aristoteles und das Problem der Metaphysik’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 15: 321–33.Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1961b) ‘Sur la notion aristotélicienne d’aporie’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain, Publications Universitaires, 319.Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1966) Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne, 2nd ed., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1994) ‘Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison: Philosophie et foi réligieuse chez Plutarque’, in Parerga: choix d’articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994), Lyon: Maison de l’Orient Mediterranéen, 549–84.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (2007) ‘L’unité de l’Académie selon Plutarque. Notes en marge d’un débat ancien et toujours actuel’, in Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.), A Platonic Pythagoras: Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age, Turnhout: Brepols, 6398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballériaux, O. (2001) ‘Platon, Sophiste’, in Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (eds.), Aporia dans la Philosophie grecque. Des origines à Aristote, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 8191.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Proof and the Syllogism’, in Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’, Padua: Antenore, 1759.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982a) The Presocratic Philosophers, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982b): ‘Medicine, Experience and Logic’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2468.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983) ‘Aphorism and Argument’, in Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, IL: Monist Library of Philosophy, 91109.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 5196.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990) The Toils of Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1991/2011) ‘Philosophy and Dialectic’, (French version), in Sinaceur, M. A. (ed.), Penser avec Aristote, Toulouse: Édition Ères, 107–16.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The Philosophy of Pyrrhonism’, in Hasse, W. (ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie, Berlin: De Gruyter, 4241–301.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) ‘Sextan Scepticism’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 322–34.Google Scholar
Bell, I. H. (2004) Metaphysics as an Aristotelian Science, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (1992) ‘Why Is There a Discussion of False Belief in the Theaetetus?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 30: 171–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2000) Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2006) ‘Plato’s Method of Dialectic’, in Benson, H. (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Plato Oxford: Blackwell, 8599.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (1997) ‘Philosophie, dialectique et sophistique dans Metaphysique 2’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51: 379–96.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2005) ‘Aristotelian Endoxa as a Basis for a Modern Reasonableness’, in Dottori, R. (ed.), Reason and Reasonableness, Münster: LIT Verlag, 177–90.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1997) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Ethicists, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2000) Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2009) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Trakakis, N. and Oppy, G. (eds.), History of Western Philosophy and Religion, vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–85.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2015) ‘God: M 9.13–194’, in Algra, K. and Ieorodiakonou, K. (eds.), Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beversluis, J. (2000) Cross-Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, G. and Liesenborghs, L. (1976) ‘Eine Zuweisung der Sentenz οὐκ ἔστιν ἀντιλέγειν an Prodikos von Keos’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 452–62.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 217–38.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1990) ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris: Editions du CNRS, 185236.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone, Milan: LED.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M. (2001) Alessandro di Afrodisia e la metafisica come scienza dimostrativa, Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M. (2006) ‘Continuité et rupture dans l’Académie et le platonisme’, Etudes platoniciennes III, Paris: Société d’Études Platoniciennes, 231–44.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M. (2014) ‘Plutarch and the Sceptics’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 121–34.Google Scholar
Boylan, M. (1982) ‘The Digestive and ‘Circulatory’ Systems in Aristotle’s Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology 15: 89118.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1997a) ‘Thyrsus-Bearer of the Academy or Enthusiast for Plato? Plutarch’s De Stoicorum Repugnantiis’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World, London: Classical Press of Wales, 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1997b) ‘Plutarch on the Probable Principle of Cold: Epistemology and the De Primo Frigido’, Classical Quarterly 47: 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brague, R. (1978) Le Restand. Supplément aux commentaires du Ménon de Platon, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. (1990) The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bréhier, É. (1968) La philosophie de Plotin, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (1994) Plato’s Socrates, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1999) Platon Parménide, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006) (trans.) Cicero: On Academic Scepticism, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2007) ‘Middle Platonists on Academic Scepticism’, in Sharples, R. W and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 B.C–200 A.D., vol. II, London: Institute of Classical Studies, 297315.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. and Palmer, J. (2001) ‘The New Academy’s Appeals to the Presocratics’, Phronesis 48: 3872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. (2009) ‘Aporia 8’, in Crubellier, M and Laks, A (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 135–50.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (1998) ‘Innovation and Continuity: The Battle of Gods and Giants, Sophist 245–249’, in Gentzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181208.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2008) ‘The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 437–62.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2010) ‘Definition and Division in Plato’s Sophist’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, 151–71.CrossRef
Brown, L. (2011) ‘Negation and Not-Being: Dark Matter in the Sophist’, in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: A Festschrift for Charles Kahn, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 268–91.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1887 and 1892) Scripta Minora, vols. 1 and 2, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1967) Aristote, Topiques. Tome I, Livres I–IV, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1984/85) ‘Aristotle on Arguments without Winners or Losers’, in Wissenschaftskolleg Jahrbuch, Berlin, 3140.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Criterion’, in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 224–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2000) ‘Dialectique et philosophie chez Aristote à nouveau’, in Cordero, N. L. (ed.), Ontologie et dialogue. Hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris: Vrin, 107–30.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2007) Aristote, Topiques. Tome II, Livres V–VIII, Paris: Les Belle Lettres.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. (1989) Gorgias von Leontini: Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. (1901) Platonis Opera II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy’, Philosophical Review 85: 4469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1977a) ‘Examples in Epistemology: Socrates, Theaetetus, and G.E. Moore’, Philosophy 52: 381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1977b) ‘Socratic Midwifery, Platonic Inspiration’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24: 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–38.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘Antipater and Self-Refutation: Elusive Arguments in Cicero’s Academica’, in Inwood, B and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 277310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calogero, G. (1932) Studi sull’Eleatismo, Rome: Tipografia del senato.Google Scholar
Caluori, D. (2015) Plotinus on the Soul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluori, D. (forthcoming) ‘Socratic Methods in Damascius’, in Moore, C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, Leiden: Brill.
Campbell, L. (1883) The Theaetetus of Plato, with a revised text and English notes, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castelnérac, B. and Marion, M. (2009) ‘Arguing for Inconsistency: Dialectical Games in the Academy’, in Primiero, G. and Rahman, S. (eds.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic, London: College Publications, 4382.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2002) Review of R. Bett, Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), in Ancient Philosophy 22: 443–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2013) ‘Early Pyrrhonism: Pyrrho to Aenesidemus’, in Sheffield, F. and Warren, J. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, London: Routledge, 496510.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2018) ‘Anesidemus’, in Machuca, D. and Reed, B. (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, London: Bloomsbury, 6780.Google Scholar
Castelnérac, B. and Marion, M. (2009) ‘Arguing for Inconsistency: Dialectical Games in the Academy’, in Primiero, G. and Rahman, S. (eds.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic, London: College Publications, 4382.Google Scholar
Chance, T. H. (1991) Plato’s Euthydemus. Analysis of What Is and What Is Not Philosophy, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charrue, P. (1978) Plotin lecteur de Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Alexander, Boethus, and the Other Peripatetics: The Theory of Universals in the Aristotelian Commentators’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Galuzzo, G. (eds.), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 299328.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. J. (1995) Aristotle and Mathematics: Aporetic Method in Cosmology and Metaphysics, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combès, J. (1989) ‘Damascius Lecteur du Parménide’, in his Etudes Néoplatoniciennes, Grénoble, 6399.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2004) ‘Arcesilaus: Socratic and Sceptic’, in his Knowledge, Nature and the Good, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 81103.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2007) ‘Socrates and Philosophy as a Way of Life’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (2012) ‘Conclusion—and Retrospect (Metaphysics A 10)’, in Steel, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–64.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2005) Reading Plotinus: A Practical Introduction to Neoplatonism, Indiana: Perdue University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, A. K. (2014) Platonic Dialogue and the Education of the Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couissin, P. (1929) ‘Le Stoicisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d’histoire de la Philosophie 3: 241–76. (English trans. in Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.), (1983), The Skeptical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 3163.)Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. (1990) ‘La problématique sceptique d’un impensé: ἡ σκέψις’, in Voelke, A. J. (ed.), Le scepticisme antique, Cahier de la Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 15: 928.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (1996) ‘The Argument from Knowing and Not Knowing in Plato’s Theaetetus (187e5– 188c8)’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2012) Plato’s Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, M. (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123.Google Scholar
De Waal, T. (2009) Knowing Platonist Objects: The Access Problem and Its Solution in Plato, PhD dissertation, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1981) Pirrone: Testimonianze, Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academy’, Classical Quarterly 42: 176–89.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. (2014) ‘Odysseus and the Home of the Stranger from Elea’, Classical Quarterly 64: 533–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
des Places, E. (1973) Numénius Fragments (ed. and trans.), Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Diès, A. (1956) Platon Parménide, Paris.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) ‘Damascius on the Ineffable’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1999) ‘Plutarch’s Debt to Xenocrates’, in Perez Jimenez, A. et al. (eds), Plutarco, Platon y Aristoteles: Actas del V Congreso internacional de la I.P.S.,Madrid, 305311. (repr. in Dillon, The Platonic Heritage, Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Blumenthal, H. J. (2015) Ennead IV.3–4.29. Problems concerning the Soul, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1928) ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origins of the Neoplatonic One’, Classical Quarterly 22: 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1994) ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in ANRW II.36.7, 50275100.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (2002) ‘L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’, in Barbanti, M. and Romano, F. (eds.), Henōsis kai Philia: Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano, Catania: CUECM, 247–73.Google Scholar
Dooley, W. E. and Madigan, A. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 2 and 3, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (2013) ‘Aristotle and the Socratic elenchos’, in Rapp, C. and Hasper, P.-S. (eds.), Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy, Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy, 15: 323–42.Google Scholar
Duncombe, M. (2013) ‘The Greatest Difficulty at Parmenides 133C-134E and Plato’s Relative Terms’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, I. (1968) ‘Aristotle’s Use of Examples in the Topics’, in Owen, G. E. L. (ed.), Aristotle on Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 202209.Google Scholar
Dye, G. and Vitrac, B. (2009) ‘Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus Empiricus: sources, cible, structure’, Phronesis 54: 155203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. (1994) ‘Alexander’s Defense of Aristotle’s Categories’, Phronesis, 39: 6989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilsson, E. (2005) ‘Soul and μερισμός’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino, Naples: Bibliopolis, 7993.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1987) Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazzo, S. (2002) Aporia e sistema: La materia, la forma, il divino nelle Quaestiones di Alessandro di Afrodisia, Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1979) ‘False Belief in the Theaetetus’, Phronesis, 24: 7080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1992) ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–26.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2003), Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2008) ‘Does Socrates Claim to Know that He Knows Nothing?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 35: 4985.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2010) ‘Sceptical Enquiry’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 493525.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2011) ‘Sceptics and Inquiry: Sextus and the Epicureans’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 90114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. N. (2006) ‘Socrates’ Demand for Definitions’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 31: 147.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1983) ‘Stoics and Sceptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), The Sceptical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 151–76.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992a) ‘Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form’, in Klagge, J. C. and Smith, N. D. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume: 201–220.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992b) ‘Introduction to the Protagoras’, in Lombardo, S., and Bell, K. (eds.), Plato: Protagoras, Indianapolis: Hackett, vii–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992c) ‘Plato’s Sophist on False Statements’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1996) ‘The Literary Form of the Sophist’, in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 135–51.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy’, Rhizai 1: 944.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1964) Platon, Bd. 2: Die Platonischen Schriften. Erste Periode, 3rd ed., Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, D. (1989) ‘Truth as What Survives the Elenchos’, in his Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3846.Google Scholar
Galpérine, M.-C. (1987) Damascius, Des Premiers Principes: Apories et resolutions, Lagrasse: Editions Verdier.Google Scholar
Gatti, M. L. (1996) ‘Plotinus: The Platonic Tradition and the Foundation of Neoplatonism’, in Gerson, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro’, The Monist 50: 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. L. (1996) Plato Parmenides: Translated by Mary Louise Gill and Paul Ryan. Introduction by Mary Louise Gill, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. (1947) Les dialogues de Platon: Structure et méthode dialectique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gonzales, F. (2002) ‘The Socratic Elenchus as Constructive Protreptic’, in Scott, G. A (ed.), Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond, State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 161182.Google Scholar
Granger, H. (2004) ‘Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 117.Google Scholar
Grgić, F. (2006) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Goal of Skepticism’, Ancient Philosophy 26: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grgić, F. (2008) ‘Sextus on the Possibility of Inquiry’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89: 436–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. (1994) ‘The Composition of the Academica: Motives and Versions’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 135.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. (1968) ‘Ein neues Protagoras-Fragment’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 2: 12.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. and Gesché, A. (1969) (eds.) Didymus der Blinde: Psalmenkommentar (Tura-Papyrus), Teil III. Papyrologische Texte und Abhandlungen, Bd. 8, Bonn: R. Habelt.Google Scholar
Gurtler, G. (2015) Ennead IV.4.30–45 and IV.5, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Hagdopoulos, D. J. (1976) ‘Protasis and Problema in the Topics’, Phronesis 21: 266–76.Google Scholar
Halper, E. (1992) ‘The Origin of Aristotle’s Metaphysical Aporiai’, in Preus, A. and Anton, J. P. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy V: Aristotle’s Ontology. Albany: SUNY Press, 151–75.Google Scholar
Halper, E. (2009) One and Many in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Books Alpha–Delta, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. (1995) The Sceptics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hasper, P.-S. (2013) ‘Between Science and Dialectic: Aristotle’s Account of Good and Bad Peirastic Arguments in the Sophistical Refutations’, in Rapp, C. and Hasper, P.-S. (eds.), Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy, Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 15: 286322.Google Scholar
Heinemman, F. (1921), Plotin: Forschungen über die plotinische Frage, Plotins Entwicklung und sein System, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Henry, D. (2005) ‘Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy’, Phronesis 50: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiley, D. (1987) ‘The Deep Challenge of Pyrrhonian Scepticism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 24: 185213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1883) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros philosophischen Schriften, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hoffman, H. (2004) ‘Zeno’s tortoise’, Antike Kunst 47: 59.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (1997) ‘L’expression de l’indicible dans le néoplatonisme grec, de Plotin à Damascius’, in Lévy, C. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’Évidence, Paris: Editions L’Harmattan, 335–90.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1993) ‘The Academic Position of Favorinus of Arelate’, Phronesis 38: 183213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (2009) La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’accademia scettica, Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1995) Plato’s Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1988) ‘On the Relative Date of the Gorgias and the Protagoras’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 69102.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. (2014) The Enneads of Plotinus. A Commentary, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kanayama, Y. (2011) ‘Plato as a Wayfinder: To Know Meno, the Robbery Case and the Road to Larissa’, Japan Studies in Classical Antiquity 1: 6388.Google Scholar
Kapp, E. (1942) Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2014) ‘Empirical Eulogos Argumentation in GA III.10’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1991) Aristotle, On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse, Newly Translated, with Introduction, Notes and Appendices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1955) ‘Gorgias on Nature or That Which Is Not’, Phronesis 1: 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H. (2009) Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1965) A Commentary on Plato’s Meno, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press (reprinted by University of Chicago Press 1989).Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. and Sihvola, J. (2000) ‘Ancient Scepticism and Philosophy of Religion’, in Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica 66, Helsinki, 125–44.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2009) ‘Aporia Zero (Metaphysics B 1, 995a24–995b4)’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta. Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2546.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-H. (2010) Der philosophische Sinn der Aporie bei Aristoteles, Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Leigh, F. (2010) ‘Being and Power in Plato’s Sophist’, Apeiron 43: 6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2014) ‘Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History and Philosophy of Science 4: 272305.Google Scholar
Leszl, W. (1975) Aristotle’s Conception of Ontology, Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1984) ‘Methods of Argument in Gorgias, Palamedes’, in Boudouris, K. (ed.), The Sophistic Movement, Athens, Kardamitsa, 233–41.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1998) ‘Plato’s Apologies and Socrates in the Theaetetus’, in Gentzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–36.Google Scholar
Machuca, D. (2006) ‘The Pyrrhonist’s Ataraxia and Philanthropia’, Ancient Philosophy 26: 111–39.Google Scholar
Machuca, D. (2011) ‘Ancient Skepticism: Pyrrhonism’, Philosophy Compass 6: 246–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machuca, D. (2013) ‘Pyrrhonism, Inquiry, and Rationality’, Elenchos 34: 201–28.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. (1988a) ‘Heraclitus and the Art of Paradox’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 137.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. (1988b) ‘Impasse and Explanation, from the Lysis to the Phaedo’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70: 1545.Google Scholar
Madigan, A. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle Metaphysics 3, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Madigan, A.(1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: the Book of Ethical Problems’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II 36 2, 1260–79.Google Scholar
Madigan, A. (1999) Aristotle Metaphysics Book B and Book K 1–2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, H. (1896–1900) Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles, 3 vols., Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Makin, S. (2005) ‘Melissus and His Opponents: The Argument of DK 30 B 8’, Phronesis 50: 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1981) ‘Protagoras on Epistemological Obstacles and Persons’, in Kerferd, G. B. (ed.), The Sophists and Their Legacy: Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy, Wiesbaden: F. Steiner. 3853.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1985) ‘Historical and Philosophical Aspects of Gorgias’ “On What Is Not”’, in Montoneri, L. and Romano, F. (eds.), Gorgia e la Sofistica, Siculorum Gymnasium 38: 243–71.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1995) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academics’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformation of the Classical Tradition Presented to Prof. I. G. Kidd, New Brunswick, 235–48.Google Scholar
Mansion, S. (1955) ‘Les apories de la Métaphysique aristotélicienne’, in Autour d’Aristote. Recueil d’études de philosophie ancienne et médiévale, offert à Monseigneur A. Mansion, Louvain, Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 141–79.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. (2010) ‘Le sceptique cherche-t-il vraiment la vérité?’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 65: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzolo, C. (2006) Plotino, Che cos’è l’essere vivente e che cos’è l’uomo? I. 1.[53]. Pisa.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1996) The Skeptic Way; Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1999a) Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1999b) ‘The Normalization of Perplexity in Aristotle’, in Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles?: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham: Lexington Books, 125–36.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2000) Plato and His Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1973) Plato, Theaetetus, translated with notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. (1996) The Religion of Socrates, State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Mejer, J. (1972) ‘The Alleged New Fragment of Protagoras’, Hermes 100: 175–8.Google Scholar
Mette, H.-J. (1984) (ed.), ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaos von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 794.Google Scholar
Mette, H.-J. (1985) (ed.), ‘Weitere Akademiker heute: von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39148.Google Scholar
Mette, H.-J. (1986–87) (ed.) ‘Philon von Larisa und Antiochos von Askalon’, Lustrum 289: 963.Google Scholar
Migliori, M. (1990) Dialettica e Verità: Commentario filosofico al ‘Parmenide’ di Platone, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Miller, M. H. (1986) Plato’s Parmenides: The Conversion of the Soul, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, D. (2004) ‘The Pyrrhonian Skeptic’s Telos’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 424–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1966) Platonis Parmenides Phaedrus, Rome: Ed. dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Morsink, J. (1982) Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (2001) (eds.) Aporia dans la philosophie grecque des origins à Aristote, Louivain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Geometry and Scepticism’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6995.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974) ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat?’, The Philosophical Review 83: 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1990) ‘Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 316.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (2010) ‘Plato on Aporia and Self-Knowledge’, in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, C. (2013) ‘How Plotinus’ Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Ennead 4.4.18.1–9’, Phronesis, 58: 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notomi, N. (1999) The Unity of Plato’s Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, C. M. (2015) ‘Skeptical Investigation and Its Perks: D.L. 9.66–70 and 79–89’, in Vogt, K. M. (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 147170.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (1993) Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (2013) Sur les traces de l’Absolu, Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism, Brussels: KAWLSK.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1961) ‘Tithenai ta phainomena’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 83103.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1970) ‘Notes on Ryle’s Plato’, in Wood, O. P. and Pitcher, G. (eds.), Ryle, London: Macmillan, 341–72. Repr. Owen, G. E. L. (1986), 85–103; and Fine, G. (1999) Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298319.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1986) Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, Nussbaum, M. (ed.), London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Owens, J. (1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian ‘Metaphysics’. A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, 3rd ed., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (1999) Plato’s Reception of Parmenides, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2000) ‘Skeptical Investigation’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 351–73.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2004) ‘Melissus and Parmenides’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 1954.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2009) Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, A. L. (1942) (trans. and comm.) Aristotle: Generation of Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2006) ‘Pyrrhonian Scepticism and the Search for Truth’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 337–60.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2010) The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, S. (1981) ‘The Greatest Difficulty for Plato’s Theory of Forms: The Unknowability Argument of Parmenides 133c–134c,’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, W. A. (1984) (trans.) ‘Sophistical Refutations’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, A. (1984) (trans.) ‘Generation of Animals’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1111–218.Google Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2003) ‘Aristotle on Aporia and Searching in Metaphysics’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 145–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2006) ‘Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato’, in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 88109.Google Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2007) ‘Is Socrates Paralyzed by His State of Aporia? Meno 79e7-80d4’, in Brisson, L. and Erler, M. (eds.), Gorgias—Menon, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 268–72.Google Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2008) ‘The Place of Aporia in Plato’s Charmides’, Phronesis 53: 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2012a) ‘What Do the Arguments in the Protagoras Amount to?’, Phronesis 57: 209–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2012b) ‘What Is Behind the ti esti Question?’, in Fink, J. L. (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, Vasilis (2015) The Structure of Enquiry in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, V. and Su, J. (2017) ‘The Concept of Ousia in Metaphysics Alpha, Beta, and Gamma’, in Polansky, R. and Wians, W. (eds.), Reading Aristotle. Exposition and Argument, Leiden: Brill, 257276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polito, R. (2014) Aenesidemus of Cnossus: Testimonia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prantl, C. (1855) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (1996) Die Aristotelische Topik: ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B, München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2010) ‘Dialektik und Gespräch bei Aristoteles’, in Hempfer, K. W and Traninger, A (eds.), Der Dialog im Diskursfeld seiner Zeit. Von der Antike bis zur Aufklärung, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 4773.Google Scholar
Prior, W. J. (1998) ‘Plato and the “Socratic Fallacy”’, Phronesis 43: 97113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. (2016) ‘Dialectic and Logic from a Rhetorical Point of View’, in Gourinat, J.-B. and Lemaire, J. (eds.), Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité, Paris: Vrin, 161192.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. and Wagner, T. (2013) ‘On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory’, Argumentation 27: 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappe, S. (1998) ‘Scepticism in the Sixth Century? Damascius’ Doubts and Solutions Concerning First Principles’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 337–63.Google Scholar
Rappe, S. (2000) Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappe, S. (2010) Damascius’ Problems and Solutions Concerning First Principles. Translated from the Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2007) Essentialisme: Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reale, G. (1980) The Concept of First Philosophy and the Unity of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (2007) (ed.) The Academica of Cicero, London: Evergreen.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. (2007) Plato’s Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. (1967) Plotinus: The Road to Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1942) ‘Plato’s Parmenides II’, Classical Philology 37: 159–86.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1953) Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, E. (2016) Exploring Both Sides: Plato’s New Method for First Principles, doctoral dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Ross, W. S. (1924) (ed.) Aristotle: Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, vols. 1–2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. S (1958) Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici elenchi, rec. brevique adnotatione critica instr., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. (1972) ‘The Socratic Fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10: 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (1996) Parmenides’ Lesson: Translation and Explication of Plato’s Parmenides, South Bend: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (2005) ‘The Method Revisited: Parmenides, 135E9-136C6’, in Havlícek, A. and Karfík, F. (eds.), Plato’s Parmenides (Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Platonicum Pragense), Prague: OIKOYMENH, 125–40.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Academic Epistemology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323–51.Google Scholar
Scolnicov, S. (2001) Plato’s Parmenides, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2006) Plato’s Meno, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (2004) The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (2012) (ed.) The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1985) Plato. Meno, Oxford: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: Tradition and Innovation’, ANRW II.32.7.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1990) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Ethical Problems, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 1.1–2.15, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1994) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16–3.15, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement On the Soul, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2005) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts’, Phronesis, 50: 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2008) Alexander of Aphrodisias, Mantissa, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1993) ‘Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic’, Synthese, 96: 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle, Topics. Books I and VIII with Excerpts from Related Texts, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1999) ‘Dialectic and Method in Aristotle’, in Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles?: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham: Lexington Books, 3956.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2000) ‘Sextus Empiricus, the Neighbouring Philosophies and the Sceptical Tradition’, in Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 66: 3561.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. K. (1962) Plato’s Use of Fallacy. A Study of the Euthydemus and some other Dialogues, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. K. (1973) ‘Introduction’, in Plato, Laches and Charmides, Library of Liberal Arts.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. (2001) ‘Aristote, Métaphysique’, in Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (eds.), Aporia dans la Philosophie grecque. Des origines à Aristote, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 257–68.Google Scholar
Stocks, J. L. (1984) (trans.) ‘de Caelo’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 447511.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical Strategies’, in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5483.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996) ‘On the Differences Between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, in her own Essays in on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. (2001) ‘Scepticism as a Kind of Philosophy’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83: 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szaif, J. (1996) Platons Begriff der Wahrheit, Freiburg/München: Alber.Google Scholar
Szaif, J. (2004) ‘Die Aletheia in Platons Tugendlehre’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), Platon Verstehen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism: The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) ‘The End of the Euthyphro’, Phronesis, 27: 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. E. (2014) ‘Pyrrhonian Skepticism, Value Nihilism and the Good of Knowledge’, Ancient Philosophy 34: 317–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2011) ‘Sextus Empiricus on Skeptical Piety’, in Machuca, D. E. (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism, Philosophia Antiqua 126, Leiden: Brill, 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2015) ‘Plato’s Representations of the “Socratics”’, in Zilioli, U. (ed.), From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools, London: Routledge, 125.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. M. (2011) Plato’s Charmides. Positive Elenchus in a ‘Socratic’ Dialogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2001) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Topics 1, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1967) ‘Zeno of Elea’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, New York: Macmillan, 369–79.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994a) ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3966.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994b) ‘Is the “Socratic Fallacy” Socratic?’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6786.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. (2010) ‘Scepticism and Action’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–80.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. (2012) Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, K. M. (2015) (ed.) Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkmann-Schluck, K. H. (1957) Plotin als Interpret der Ontologie Platons, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
von Kutschera, F. (1995) Platons ‘Parmenides’, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1920) Platon, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wagner, T. and Rapp, C. (2004) Aristoteles, Topik. Neuübersetzung mit Kommentar und Einleitung, Ditzingen, Ditzingen: Reclam Verlag.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) ‘Socratic Scepticism in Plutarch’s Adversus Colotem’, Elenchos 23: 333–56.Google Scholar
Weische, A. (1965) Cicero und die neue Akademie, Münster: Achendorf.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. and Combès, J. (1986) Damascius: Traité Des Premiers Principes, Vol. I, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, M. A. (2000) Pyrrhonian Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1985) ‘Didymus on Protagoras and the Protagoreans’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 23: 483–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘Expert Knowledge in the Apology and Laches: What a General Needs to Know’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 3: 79115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1988) ‘Aporetic Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 139–68.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1990) ‘Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6084.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (2010) ‘The Pyrrhonian Modes’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–31.Google Scholar