Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Two perspectives
- Part II Brain, evolution, and comparative analysis
- Part III Dynamic systems in action and language
- Part IV From mirror system to syntax and Theory of Mind
- Part V Development of action and language
- 12 The development of grasping and the mirror system
- 13 Development of goal-directed imitation, object manipulation, and language in humans and robots
- 14 Assisted imitation: affordances, effectivities, and the mirror system in early language development
- 15 Implications of mirror neurons for the ontogeny and phylogeny of cultural processes: the examples of tools and language
- Index
- References
15 - Implications of mirror neurons for the ontogeny and phylogeny of cultural processes: the examples of tools and language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2009
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Two perspectives
- Part II Brain, evolution, and comparative analysis
- Part III Dynamic systems in action and language
- Part IV From mirror system to syntax and Theory of Mind
- Part V Development of action and language
- 12 The development of grasping and the mirror system
- 13 Development of goal-directed imitation, object manipulation, and language in humans and robots
- 14 Assisted imitation: affordances, effectivities, and the mirror system in early language development
- 15 Implications of mirror neurons for the ontogeny and phylogeny of cultural processes: the examples of tools and language
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
In this chapter I explore two qualities of the mirror neuron system that are critical for the evolution of tool use and language, central characteristics of human culture. The two characteristics of the mirror system are: (1) the ability of the system to respond both to one's own act and to the same act performed by another and (2) the system's selective response to intentional or goal-directed action (Fogassi et al., 2005). The ability to respond neurally both to one's own act and to the same act performed by another constitutes the neural foundation of imitation on the behavioral level (Iacoboni et al., 1999) and of repetition on the linguistic and cognitive levels (Ochs (Keenan), 1977). The selective response of the mirror neuron system to goal-directed action constitutes the neural facilitation of goal-directed action on the behavioral level and of intentionality on the cognitive level (Greenfield, 1980). My purpose is then to demonstrate the importance of these neurally grounded behavioral competencies for the evolution and ontogenetic development of two key aspects of human culture, tool use and language. In so doing, my larger goal is to contribute to understanding the neural underpinnings for the ontogeny and phylogeny of human culture.
In order to provide data on phylogeny, I draw upon my own research and that of others to compare chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and humans (Homo sapiens). The Pan line and the hominid line diverged in evolutionary history approximately 5 million years ago (Stauffer et al., 2001).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System , pp. 501 - 533Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
, , , , and , 2004. Left hemisphere motor facilitation in response to manual action sounds. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19: 2609–2612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bard, K. A., and Russell, C. L., 1999. Evolutionary foundations of imitation: social cognitive and developmental aspects of imitative processes in non-human primates. In and (eds.) Imitation in Infancy.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–123.Google Scholar
, and , 1979. Development of structure and strategy in two dimensional pictures. Devel. Psychol. 15: 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , 1974. Imitation in language: if, when, and why. Cogn. Psychol. 6: 380–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1973. Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and , 2005. The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 43: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S., 1974. The organization of early skilled action. In (ed.) The Integration of a Child into a Social World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–184.Google Scholar
, , , et al., 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13: 400–404.Google Scholar
, , , , and ., 2003. Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5497–5502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, C. P., and Greenfield, P. M., 1980. Informal modes of learning and teaching: the case of Zinacanteco weaving. In N. Warren (ed.) Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 2. London: Academic Press, pp. 269–316.
, 2004. Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: whence motherese?Behav. Brain Sci. 27: 491–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, 2002. Beyond self and other: the neurosemiotic emergence of intersubjectivity. Sign Systems Stud. 30: 57–100.Google Scholar
, , and , 2005. Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17: 212–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , 2003. Language perception activates the hand motor cortex: implications for motor theories of speech perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18: 704–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al., 2005. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308: 662–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , 1995. Observations of spontaneous tool making and tool use in a captive group of western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Folia Primatol. 65: 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119: 593–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , 2004. At the root of embodied cognition: cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain Cogn. 56: 100–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , 2002. Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415: 755–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and , 1975. The search for structural principles in children's manipulative play. Child Devel. 46: 734–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, P. M., 1980. Towards an operational and logical analysis of intentionality: the use of discourse in early child language. In (ed.) The Social Foundations of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of J. S. Bruner. New York: Norton, pp. 254–279.Google Scholar
1991. Language, tools, and brain: the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behav. Brain Sci. 14: 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. and Lyn, H., in press. Symbol combination in Pan: language, action, culture. In D. Washburn (ed.) Primate Perspectives on Behavior and Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
, and , 1991. Imitation, grammatical development, and the invention of protogrammar. In , , , and (eds.) Biological and Behavioral Determinants of Language Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 235–258.Google Scholar
, and 1993. Comparing communicative competence in child and chimp: the pragmatics of repetition. J. Child Lang. 20: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , 1977. Building a tree structure: the development of hierarchical complexity and interrupted strategies in children's construction activity. Devel. Psychol. 3: 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , 1976. The Structure of Communication in Early Language Development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , and , 1972. The development of rulebound strategies for manipulating seriated cups: a parallel between action and grammar. Cogn. Psychol. 3: 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Maynard, A. E., Boehm, C., and Yut Schmidtling, E., 2000. Cultural apprenticeship and cultural change: tool learning and imitation in chimpanzees and humans. In , , and (eds.) Biology, Brains, and Behavior: The Evolution of Human Development. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 237–277.Google Scholar
, 1980. A central processor for hierarchically structured material: evidence from Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia 18: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al., 2003. Activation of Broca's area during the production of spoken and signed language: a combined cytoarchitectonic mapping and PET analysis. Neuropsychologia 41: 1868–1876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al., 1999. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286: 2526–2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson Pynn, J., Fragaszy, D. M., et al., 1999. Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol. 113: 137–148.
Keenan (Ochs), E., 1977. Making it last: uses of repetition in child language. In and (eds.) Child Discourse. New York: Academic Press, pp. 125–138.Google Scholar
, , , et al., 2002. Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297: 846–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and , 1977. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198: 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, H. L., 1990. The cognitive foundations for reference in a signing orangutan. In and (eds.) “Language” and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 511–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (submitted for publication) Observing complex action sequences: The role of the fronto-parietal mirror neuron system.
, and , 2000. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. T., Langer, J., and McKinney, M. L. (eds.), 2000. Biology, Brains, and Behavior: The Evolution of Human Development. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.
, , 1999. Origins of Intelligence: The Evolution of Cognitive Development in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
, 1978. The gesture of a gorilla: langauge acquisition in another pongid. Brain Lang. 5: 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al., 2003. Social conventions in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys: evidence for traditions in a neotropical primate. Curr. Anthropol. 44: 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plooji, F. X., 1978. Some basic traits of language in wild chimpanzees. In (ed.) Action, Gesture, and Symbol: The Emergence of Language. New York: Academic Press, pp. 111–131.Google Scholar
, , , et al., 1996. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. I. Observation versus execution. Exp. Brain Res. 111: 246–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , and , 1986. Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). J. Exp. Psychol. General 115: 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., and Welsh, C. A., 1973. Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In and (eds.) Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 485–497.Google Scholar
, , , , and , 2001. Human and ape molecular clocks and constraints on paleontological hypotheses. J. Hered. 92: 469–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and , 1987. Observational learning of tool use of young chimpanzees. J. Hum. Evol. 2: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , 1993. Imitative learning of actions on objects by children, chimpanzees, and enculturated chimpanzees. Child Devel. 64: 1688–1705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E., and Fragaszy, D., 2002. “Do monkeys ape?” Ten years after. In and (eds.) Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 471–499.Google Scholar
, 1998. Imitation of the sequential structure of actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Comp. Psychol. 112: 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zihlman, A., 1996. Reconstructions reconsidered: chimpanzee models and human evolution. In and (eds.) Great Ape Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by