Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T17:27:45.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Case study 3: monitoring requirements for fugitive emissions from fuels in the CDM

from Part III - MRV at offset project scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Alexandra Barker
Affiliation:
NPL
Roderick Robinson
Affiliation:
NPL
Valentin Bellassen
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Nicolas Stephan
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Get access

Summary

Fugitive emissions scale and scope

Fugitive emissions are uncontrolled releases from leaking equipment (assumed to be sealed), uncontrolled but routine venting or emissions to air from other uncontrolled sources. Although they are unmonitored releases they are not necessarily unintentional, for example compressor stations may have planned but unmonitored releases. In this chapter the term fugitive emissions follows the definition in the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines, “an intentional or unintentional release of gases from anthropogenic activities excluding the combustion of fuels” (IPCC, 1997). Fugitive emissions are significant sources from the mineral oil refining and natural gas industry due to the large number of components which are potential sources at each facility. Emissions tend to occur from production, distribution and storage processes. There can be numerous leak sources throughout a single plant and this diffuse nature makes them difficult to detect and quantify. This chapter will focus on component leaks within the scope of above-ground equipment.

For CDM project activities there is an interest in mitigating or reducing greenhouse gas emissions and hence this case study will focus on the detection and quantification of fugitive methane emissions. However, it should be noted that many of the methodologies are based on techniques developed in the oil and gas industry to detect hydrocarbon emissions. Fugitives and combustion account for 19 percent of reported methane emissions in Europe (Global Methane Initiative, 2013). Methane is the primary constituent of natural gas, with the potential to be emitted to the atmosphere during production, processing, storage, transmission and distribution (UNEP/WMO,2011).

Offset projects based on the capture of fugitive methane are attractive to project developers: there are currently ten CDM methodologies (see Table 14.3 in the appendix) relevant to fugitive emissions from fuels (mining, oil wells, gas flaring in power plants, equipment leaks and low carbon electricity). As of December 31st, 2013, 215 projects using these methodologies had registered under the scope of this sector (2.6 percent of all registered CDM projects) (UNFCCC, 2013a).

Type
Chapter
Information
Accounting for Carbon
Monitoring, Reporting and Verifying Emissions in the Climate Economy
, pp. 467 - 509
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Petroleum Institute (API), 1997. Analysis of Refinery Screening Data (API Publication No. 310), American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
American Petroleum Institute (API), 2004. Smart Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) for Control of Fugitive Emissions. www.ihs.com/. Accessed April 3, 2013.
American Petroleum Institute (API), 2006. API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, Chapter 14.
American Petroleum Institute (API), 2009. Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil and Gas Industry. Washington|DC.www.api.org/ehs/climate/new/upload/2004_COMPENDIUM.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2013.
Brown, T.G., 2011. Innovative Technologies to Detect and Measure Leaks. International Gas Union Research Conference 2011. USA.Google Scholar
Carbon, Limits, 2014. Quantifying Cost-effectiveness of Systematic Leak Detection and Repair Programs Using Infrared Cameras. The Clean Air Task Force. www.catf.us/resources/publications/view/198. Accessed August 2, 2013.
Centre for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). www.c2es.org/technology/factsheet/natural-gas. Accessed August 2, 2013.
Chambers, A., Strosher, M., Wootton, T., Moncrieff, J. and McCready, P., 2006. DIAL Measurements of Fugitive Emissions from Natural Gas Plants and the Comparison with Emission Factor Estimates. Environmental Protection Agency. 15th International Emission Inventory Conference, New Orleans, May 15–18.Google Scholar
Chambers, A., Wootton, T., Moncrieff, J. and McCready, P., 2008. Direct measurement of fugitive emissions of hydrocarbons from a refinery. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 58(8): 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumdei, B., Dunn, J., Melvin, E. and Hahs, R., 2009. Operations and Maintenance of Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Systems Emission Reductions Projects. URS Corporation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2013. Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2013. Independent Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Energy Information Administration. www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf. Accessed June 3, 2013.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1992. Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions From Process Units in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry – Background Information for Proposed Standards, Vol. 1C – Model Emission Sources. Emission Standards Division, US EPA, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. November.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1995. 1995 Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates; EPA-453/R-95-017; US EPA; Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2003. Lessons Learned From Natural Gas STAR Partners. Directed Inspection and Maintenance at Gas Processing Plants and Booster Stations. US EPA, Washington, DC. https://www.globalmethane.org/documents/m2mtool/docs/ll_dimgasproc.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2006a. VOC Fugitive Losses: New Monitors, Emissions Losses, and Potential Policy Gaps. International Workshop. US EPA.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2006b. Optical Remote Sensing for Emission Characterization from Non-point Sources. FINAL ORS Protocol. Technology Transfer Network Emission Measurement Center. US EPA.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2007. Leak Detection and Repair Compliance Assistance Guidance – A Best Practices Guide. US EPA, Washington, DC. www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/publications/assistance/ldarguide.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2011. EPA Handbook: Optical Remote Sensing for Measurement and Monitoring of Emissions Flux. US EPA. Research Triangle, NC. www.epa.gov/ttnemc01/guidlnd/gd-052.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.
Epperson, D., Lev-On, M., Taback, H., Siegell, J. and Ritter, K., 2007. Equivalent leak definitions for smart LDAR (leak detection and repair) when using optical imaging technology. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 57(9): 1050–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Commission, 2006. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on Emissions from Storage. July. http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/esb_bref_0706.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2013.
Forward-looking infrared imaging systems (FLIR). Thermal Imaging for Oil & Petrochemical. FLIR Systems. www.flir.com/thermography/americas/us/view/?id=49559. Accessed March 3, 2013.
Gas Research Institute and Environmental Protection Agency (GRI/EPA), 1996. Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Industry, Vols 1–15, Final Report by Harrison, M.R., Shires, T.M., Wessels, J.K. and Cowgill, R.M.
Glancy, R.P., 2013. Quantifying Fugitive Emission Factors from Unconventional Natural Gas Production Using IPCC Methodologies. IGES, Hayama, Japan.Google Scholar
Global Methane Initiative, 2013. European Commission Global Methane Reduction Actions. Ref. Ares(2013) 2843722. www.globalmethane.org/documents/EC_GMI_reduction_actions.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2013.
Griffiths, P.R and De Haseth, J.A, 2007. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (2nd Edn.)Chemical Analysis, Vol. 83. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Guigon, P., Bellassen, V. and Ambrosi, P., 2009. Voluntary carbon markets: what the standards say… (Working Paper No. 2009–4). CDC Climat Research, Paris.
Hanson, R.K., Varghese, P.L., Schoenunga, S.M. and Falcone, P.K., 1980. Absorption spectroscopy of combustion gases using a tunable IR diode laser. Laser Probes for Combustion Chemistry, D.R., Crosley (Ed.), ACS Symposium, Series 134, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
IEA, 2008. Energy Technology Perspectives 2008: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. OECD Publishing. Paris. www.iea.org/techno/etp/etp_2008_exec_sum_english.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2013.
IGES, 2013. CDM Project Database. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Lim, B., Treanton, K., Mamaty, I., Bonduki, Y., Griggs, D.J. and Callander, B.A. (Eds.). IPCC/OECD/IEA, Paris.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2000. IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Fugitive Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Activities. Energy Sector. www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/pub-lic/gp/english/. Accessed March 4, 2013.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol 2, Chap 4. Carras, J.J., Franklin, P. M.Hu, Y., Singh, A.K., Tailakov, O.V., Picard, D., Ahmed, A.F.M., Gjerald, E., Nordrum, S. and Yesserkepova, I.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group 1, Chap 2. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, Table 2.14, p. 212. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2013. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group I. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Final Draft Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014. Emission Factor Database (EFDB). IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php.
Kulp, T.J., Powers, P.E. and Kennedy, R., 1998. Remote imaging of controlled gas releases using active and passive infrared imaging systems. Proceedings of Infrared Technology and Applications XXIII, SPIE Vol. 3061:269–278.Google Scholar
Lott, R.A., Howard, T. and Web, M., 1996. Estimating Fugitive Emissions: Problems and Solutions. Presented at the Fugitive Emissions Symposium. Las Vegas, NV, August 15–16, p. 22.Google Scholar
Quality Tonnes. QT's Approved CDM Methodologies, AM0023 (Reducing Gas Leaks in Pipeline Compressor Stations). www.qualitytonnes.com/methodologies4.htm. Accessed August 2, 2013.
Robinson, R., Gardiner, T., Innocenti, F., Woods, P. and Coleman, M., 2011. Infrared Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) measurements of hydrocarbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Monitoring13.
RTI International, 2011. Emissions Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries. www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/efpac/protocol/Emission_Estimation_Protocol_for_Petroleum_Refinerie_052011.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2013.
Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory Reporting (SPRI), 2013. Petroleum Activities Guidance Note 2013. www.sepa.org.uk/. Accessed August 2, 2013.
Shishlov, I. and Bellassen, V., 2012. 10 lessons from 10 years of the CDM (No. 37), Climate Report. CDC Climat Research, Paris.
United Kingdom Accreditation Service, 2012. M3003: the Expression of Uncertainty and Confidence in Measurement. Eds 3. United Kingdom Accreditation Service Middlesex, UK.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2011. Approved baseline and monitoring methodology AM0023: Leak detection and repair in gas production, processing, transmission, storage and distribution systems and in refinery facilities. Clean Development Mechanism. http://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/L/V/8/LV8NU1GYWTK06COJPDIXQ35FR2MA47/EB63_repan14_AM0023_ver04.0.0.pdf?t=VTl8bXNqemo5fDCVM-mA_wKnFXsl NdhFQKfT. Accessed June 3, 2013.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2012. Benefits of the Clean Development Mechanism. G.A., Kirkman, S., Seres, E., Haites and R., Spalding-Fecher, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/dev_ben/about/dev_ben/ABC_2012.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2013.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2013a. Project activities, Data as of: December 31, 2013. CDM Insights. http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Public/CDMinsights/index.html. Accessed July 12, 2013.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2013b. Project Search: Fugitive emissions from fuels (solid, oil and gas). Clean Development Mechanism. http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/projsearch.html. Accessed August 2, 2013.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2013c. Methodologies linked to sectoral scopes. Clean Development Mechanism. http://cdm.unfccc.int/DOE/scopes.html. Accessed August 2, 2013.
United Nations Environment Programme and World Meteorological Organization (UNEP/WMO), 2011. Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone. UNEP/WMO. ISBN: 92-807-3141-6.
Wilwerding, J., 2012. LDAR Programs: friend or foe? HaaenSage Engineering. www.valve-world.net. Accessed August 9, 2013.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×