Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ms7nj Total loading time: 0.923 Render date: 2022-08-17T22:37:18.623Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Section I - Limits for IVF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

Roy Homburg
Affiliation:
Homerton University Hospital, London
Adam H. Balen
Affiliation:
Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine
Robert F. Casper
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

HFEA. Fertility treatment 2018: trends and figures. 2020; available from: www.hfea.gov.uk/media/3158/fertility-treatment-2018-trends-and-figures.pdf.Google Scholar
NICE. Fertility Problems: assessment and treatment. NICE Clinical Guideline [CG156]. 2013 [updated 2017]; available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/resources/fertility-problems-assessment-and-treatment-pdf-35109634660549.Google Scholar
Magnus, MC, Wilcox, AJ, Morken, N, Weinberg, CR, Håberg, SE. Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study. BMJ 2019;364:l869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care. 2019; available from: www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/assets/downloads/mbrrace-uk/reports/MBRRACE.Google Scholar
MBRRACE-UK. Perinatal mortality surveillance report. 2019; available from: www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/assets/downloads/mbrrace-uk/reports/MBRRACE.Google Scholar
Gunnala, V, Irani, M, Melnick, A, Rosenwaks, Z, Spandorfer, S. One thousand seventy-eight autologous IVF cycles in women 45 years and older: the largest single-center cohort to date. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(3):435–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubaldi, FM, Cimadomo, D, Capalbo, A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing in women older than 44 years: a multicenter experience. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1173–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sydsjö, G, Lindell Pettersson, M, Bladh, M, Skoog Svanberg, A, Lampic, C, Nedstrand, E. Evaluation of risk factors’ importance on adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women aged 40 years or older. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prepregnancy counselling. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 762. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e78–9.Google Scholar
Savasi, VM, Mandia, L, Laoreti, A, Cetin, I. Maternal and fetal outcomes in oocyte donation pregnancies. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(5):620–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sermondade, N, Huberlant, S, Bourhis-Lefebvre, V, et al. Female obesity is negatively associated with live birth rate following IVF: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:439–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, KA, Dezarnaulds, GM, Denyer, GS, Skilton, MR, Caterson, D. Weight loss improves reproductive outcomes in obese women undergoing fertility treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Obes. 2014;4:61–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinós, JJ, Polo, A, Sánchez-Hernández, J, et al. Weight decrease improves live birth rates in obese women undergoing IVF: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:417–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutsaerts, MAQ, van Oers, AM, Groen, H, et al. Randomized trial of a lifestyle program in obese infertile women. NEJM. 2016;374:1942–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einarsson, S, Bergh, C, Friberg, B, et al. Weight reduction intervention for obese infertile women prior to IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1621–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, KD, Sacks, G, Chandramohan, D, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378:826–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutsaerts, MA, van Oers, AM, Groen, H, et al. Randomized trial of a lifestyle program in obese infertile women. New England J Med. 2016;374:1942–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einarsson, S, Bergh, C, Friberg, B, et al. Weight reduction intervention for obese infertile women prior to IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1621–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, K, Cnattingius, S, Naslund, I, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy after bariatric surgery. New England J Med. 2015;372:814–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneed, ML, Uhler, ML, Grotjan, HE, Rapisarda, JJ, Lederer, KJ, Beltsos, AN. Body mass index: impact on IVF success appears age-related. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1835–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SS, Zhu, Y, Grantz, KL, et al. Obstetric and neonatal risks among obese women without chronic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:104–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heffner, LJ. Advanced maternal age – how old is too old? New Engl J Med. 2004;351:1927–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, B, Brown, MB. Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(5):1264–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE–UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care – Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015–17. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2019.Google Scholar
Jeve, YB, Potdar, N, Opoku, A, Khare, M. Donor oocyte conception and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123(9):1471–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RCOG. Multiple pregnancies following assisted conception. Scientific impact paper no. 22. 2018. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14974. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.14974.Google Scholar
Treibner, K, Markevych, I, Hustad, S, et al. Residential surrounding greenspace and age at menopause: a 20 year European study. Environ Internat. 2019;132:105088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitcomb, B, Purdue-Smith, AC, Szegda, KL, et al. Cigarette smoking and risk of early menopause. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;187(4):696704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, M, Wilcox, A, Morken, N-H, et al. Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study BMJ. 2019;364:18.Google ScholarPubMed
Stoop, D, van der Veen, F, Deneyer, M, Nekkebroeck, J, Tournaye, H. Oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion (AGE) is a preventive intervention, neither social nor nonmedical. Reprod. Biomed. 2014;28:548–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, F. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1802–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobo, A, Meseguer, M, Remohi, J, Pellicer, A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobo, A, Garcia-Velasco, JA, Coello, A, Domingo, J, Pellicer, A, Remohi, J. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:755–64.e8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobo, A, Garcia-Velasco, J, Domingo, J, Pellicer, A, Remohi, J. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:2222–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, K. Egg Freezing, Fertility and Reproductive Choice: Negotiating Hope, Responsibility and Modern Motherhood. Emerald: Bingley, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HFEA. Egg Freezing in Fertility Treatment: Trends and Figures 2010–2016. HFEA, 2018.Google Scholar
Daar, J, Benward, J, Collins, L, et al. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: An ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1022–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E. The ambiguities of ‘social’ egg freezing and the challenges of informed consent. BioSocieties. 2018;13(1):2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, K, Culley, L. Women’s experience of social egg freezing: Perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’. Hum Fertil. 2018;1:17.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×