Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T02:40:11.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct democracy, policy diffusion, and medicalized marijuana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Cynthia Rugeley ,
John Frendreis  and
Raymond Tatalovich
Cynthia Rugeley*
Affiliation:
University of MinnesotaDuluth
John Frendreis
Affiliation:
Loyola UniversityChicago
Raymond Tatalovich
Affiliation:
Loyola UniversityChicago
*
Correspondence: Cynthia Rugeley, Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN. Email: crugeley@d.umn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Virtually all studies of policy diffusion are based on statutory enactments by state legislatures. But a substantial number of medicalized marijuana laws were initiated through citizen initiatives and ratified by referenda (I&R). This case study suggests that the diffusion of laws adopted by I&R requires two modifications to the conventional model of policy diffusion. First, early policy adoptions must occur through direct democracy so that horizontal diffusion results when those past adoptions by the I&R process lead to future adoptions. Second, the necessity of bypassing institutions of representative government must be operationalized as an interaction between the availability of direct democracy and the precise political variable that blocks legislative enactments.

Keywords

direct democracyreferendummedicalized marijuanapolicy diffusion
Type
Research Notes
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , Spring 2021 , pp. 72 - 82
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. D., Pettus, C., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2004). Making the national local: Specifying the conditions for national government influence on state policymaking. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4(3), 318–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K. (2002). Direct democracy and the link between public opinion and state abortion policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2(4), 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2014). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Sabatier, P. A. & Weible, C. M. (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process, (3rd ed., pp. 307–359). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Biggers, D. R. (2011). When ballot issues matter: Social issue ballot measures and their impact on turnout. Political Behavior, 33(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. (2005, November 1). Who supports marijuana legalization? Gallup. http://news.gallup.com/poll/19561/who-supports-mmarijuana-legalizatioin.aspxGoogle Scholar
Dennis, B. (2013, August 29). Obama administration will not block state marijuana laws if distribution is regulated. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/obama-administration-will-not-preempt-state-marijuana-laws--for-now/2013/08/29/b725bfd8-10bd-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Policy Studies, 44(2), 343–357.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraiolo, K. (2007). From killer weed to popular medicine: The evolution of American drug control policy, 1937–2000. Journal of Policy History, 19(2), 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, A., & Moyer, L. (2009). Competing social movements and local political culture: Voting on ballot propositions to ban same-sex marriage in the U.S. states. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, J., & Tatalovich, R. (2010). A hundred miles of dry: Religion and the persistence of Prohibition in the U.S. states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(3), 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, B. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, E. R. (1996). Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, Gonzales V, 545 U.S. 1 (2005)Google Scholar
Grossback, L. J., Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research, 32(5), 521–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001). Policy diffusion as a geographical expansion of the scope of political conflict: Same-sex marriage bans in the 1990s. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, A. L., & Mallinson, D. J. (2018). Defiant innovation: The adoption of medical marijuana laws in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K. Q., & Klarner, C. (2002). The many faces of elite power in the “system of 1896.” Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1115–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, A. (2007). Emerging issues and future directions in state policy diffusion research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(1), 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. C. (2013). Direct democracy and minority rights. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G. (2018). Public policy and the initiative and referendum: A survey with some new evidence. Public Choice, 174(1/2), 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. (1991). Through the past darkly: The politics and policies of America’s drug war. Journal of Policy History, 3(4), 356–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. (1992). The politics of drug abuse: Laws, implementation, and consequences. Western Political Quarterly, 45(1), 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. (1994). The politics of sin: Drugs, alcohol, and public policy. M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J., & McFarlane, D. R. (1993). The politics of funding abortions: State responses to the political environment. American Politics Quarterly, 21(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-H. (2000). The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: U.S. death penalty reform, 1956–82. Journal of Politics, 62(1), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, S. P. (2003). The political environment and ballot proposition awareness. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, J. (2012). The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion on the diffusion of antismoking legislation across the American states. Journal of Politics, 74(1), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacula, R. L., Chriqui, J. F., Reichmann, D. A., & Terry-McElrath, Y. M. (2002). State medical marijuana laws: Understanding the laws and their limitations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23(4), 413–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center, Pew Research. (2015, April 14). In debate over legalizing marijuana, disagreement over drug’s dangers. http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/14/in-debate-over-legalizing-marijuana-disagree.../Google Scholar
Rhodebeck, L. A. (2015). Another issue comes out: Gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(6), 701–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roh, J., & Berry, F. S. (2008). Modeling the outcomes of state abortion funding referenda: Morality or redistributive policy, or both? State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(1), 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roh, J., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2003). All politics is not local: National forces in state abortion initiatives. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, C., & Healy, J. (2018, January 4). Trump administration takes step that could threaten marijuana legalization movement. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/marijuana-legalization-justice-department-prosecutions.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, D.J. (2001). Official-English and the states: Influences on declaring English the official language in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 54(2), 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, E. B. (1992). Agenda-setting and policy results: Lessons from three drug policy episodes. Policy Studies Journal, 20(4), 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, D. & Moore, S. (2009, October 19). U.S. won’t prosecute in states that allow medical marijuana. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/us/20cannabis.htmlGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, J. M., Lock, E. D., & Rasinski, K. A. (2003). How should we wage the war on drugs? Determinants of public preferences for drug control alternatives. Policy Studies Journal, 31(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, C. J., Bowen, D. C., & Donovan, T. (2009). Initiative campaigns: Direct democracy and voter mobilization. American Politics Research, 37(1), 155–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Group, U.S. Cancer Statistics Working. (2021). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-20-14 Incidence and mortality web-based report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.Google Scholar
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative, 532 U.S. 483 (2001)Google Scholar
Volden, C. (2006). States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the children’s health insurance program. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendell, D. G., & Tatalovich, R. (2020). Classifying public policies with moral foundations theory. Policy Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-202-09399-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar