Element contents
The Psychology of Effective Activism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2021
Summary
This Element reviews the social psychology of effective collective action, highlighting the importance of considering activists' goals, timeframes, and psychological perspectives in seeking to conceptualise this construct. A novel framework 'ABIASCA' maps effectiveness in relation to activists' goals for mobilisation and change (Awareness raising; Building sympathy; turning sympathy into Intentions; turning intentions into Actions; Sustaining groups over time; Coalition-building; and Avoiding opponents' counter-mobilisation). We also review the DIME model of Disidentification, Innovation, Moralization and Energization, which examines the effects of failure in creating trajectories of activists' disidentification from collective action; innovation (including to radicalisation or deradicalisation); and increased moral conviction and energy. The social psychological drivers of effective collective action for four audiences are examined in detail, in four sections: for the self and supporters, bystanders, opponents, and for third parties. We conclude by highlighting an agenda for future research, and drawing out key messages for scholars.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108975476Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 12 August 2021
References
Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the US environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–620. www.jstor.org/stable/4495000Google Scholar
Agronick, G. S., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Personality and social change: Individual differences, life path, and importance attributed to the women’s movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1545Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M., & Hitlin, P. (2016). Social media conversations about race: How social media users see, share and discuss race and the rise of hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/08/15/social-media-conversations-about-race.Google Scholar
Andits, P. (2016). From historical injustice to local conflict: Mobilization–countermobilization dynamics surrounding the 2005 Melbourne ‘Trianon Protest’. Social Movement Studies, 15(3), 322–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1070727Google Scholar
Andrews, K., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386689Google Scholar
Anisin, A. (2016). Violence begets violence: Why states should not lethally repress popular protest. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(7), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1192536Google Scholar
Art, D. (2011). Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Awad, S. H. (2016). The identity process in times of rupture: Narratives from the Egyptian revolution. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 128–41. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayanian, A. H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12164Google Scholar
Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Andrews, K. T. (2013). Leading associations: How individual characteristics and team dynamics generate committed leaders. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 544–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413489877Google Scholar
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., Kashima, Y., & Crimston, D. (2013). Collective futures: How projections about the future of society are related to actions and attitudes supporting social change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 523–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–8. www.jstor.org/stable/20182630Google Scholar
Bar‐Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21(2), 351–65. www.jstor.org/stable/3791795Google Scholar
Beamish, T. D., & Luebbers, A. J. (2009). Alliance building across social movements: Bridging difference in a peace and justice coalition. Social Problems, 56(4), 647–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.647Google Scholar
Beer, M. (2021). Revisiting the Methods of Nonviolent Action. Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
Ben David, Y., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2018). Practice the change you want to see in the world: Transformative practices of social movements in Israel. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–39. www.jstor.org/stable/223459Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.xGoogle Scholar
Berndsen, M., Thomas, E. F., & Pedersen, A. (2018). Resisting perspective-taking: Glorification of the national group elicits non-compliance with perspective-taking instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 126–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.007Google Scholar
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackwood, L., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Choosing between conciliatory and oppositional leaders: The role of out‐group signals and in‐group leader candidates’ collective action tactics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 320–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, L. M., & Louis, W. R. (2012). If it matters for the group then it matters to me: Collective action outcomes for seasoned activists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02001.xGoogle Scholar
Bliuc, A.M., McGarty, C., Hartley, L., & Muntele, H.D. (2012). Manipulating national identity: The strategic use of rhetoric by supporters and opponents of the ‘Cronulla riots’ in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(12), 2174–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.600768Google Scholar
Bliuc, A.M., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Berndsen, M., & Misajon, R. (2015). Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 226–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507Google Scholar
Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. (2003). Predicting political behaviour in opinion-based groups: The role of social identification and social identity salience. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 34.Google Scholar
Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334Google Scholar
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453221Google Scholar
Bongiorno, R., McGarty, C., Kurz, T., Haslam, S. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Mobilizing cause supporters through group-based interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(4), 203–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12337Google Scholar
Boscarino, J. E. (2016). Setting the record straight: Frame contestation as an advocacy tactic. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 280–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12121Google Scholar
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. (2011). The rise and decline of Australian unionism: A history of Industrial labour from the 1820s to 2010. Labour History, 100, 51–82. https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.100.0051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy? Social Forces, 77(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006009Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. www.jstor.org/stable/3219881Google Scholar
Caiani, M., & Della Porta, D. (2018). The radical right as social movement organizations. In Rydgren, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.001.0001Google Scholar
Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 363–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709333296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canetti, D., Hall, B. J., Rapaport, C., & Wayne, C. (2013). Exposure to political violence and political extremism. European Psychologist, 18(4), 263–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000158Google Scholar
Carey, S. C. (2006). The dynamic relationship between protest and repression. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900101Google Scholar
Carman, J. G., & Nesbit, R. (2013). Founding new nonprofit organizations: Syndrome or symptom? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 603–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012459255Google Scholar
Chen, C. W., & Gorski, P. C. (2015). Burnout in social justice and human rights activists: Symptoms, causes and implications. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(3), 366–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv011Google Scholar
Chenoweth, E. (2020). The future of nonviolent resistance. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Lewis, O. A. (2013). Unpacking nonviolent campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 415–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312471551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Non-Violent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, L. J. (2012). Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law and Society Review, 46(4), 713–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00515.xGoogle Scholar
Cordner, A., Brown, P., & Mulcahy, M. (2015). Playing with fire: Flame retardant activists and policy arenas. In Duyvendak, J. W. & Jasper, J. (eds). Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 211–28.Google Scholar
Crelinsten, R. D. (2002). Analysing terrorism and counter-terrorism: A communication model. Terrorism and political violence, 14(2), 77–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005618Google Scholar
Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3003888Google Scholar
Curtin, N., Kende, A., & Kende, J. (2016). Navigating multiple identities: The simultaneous influence of advantaged and disadvantaged identities on politicization and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 264–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, N., & McGarty, C. (2016). Expanding on psychological theories of engagement to understand activism in context(s). Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 227–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12164Google Scholar
Danaher, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Maintaining the system with tokenism: Bolstering individual mobility beliefs and identification with a discriminatory organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 343–62. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X457530Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2000). Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216Google Scholar
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication Concept 6: Agenda-Setting. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (1995). Left-libertarian movements in context: A comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990. Discussion Paper FS III 91–102. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221Google Scholar
Dixon, J., & Levine, M. (2012). Beyond Prejudice: Extending the Social Psychology of Conflict, Inequality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2015). Professions, social movements, and the sovereign corporation. In Jasper, J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, J. (2016). Crowded advocacy: Framing dynamic in the fracking controversy in New York. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 888–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9800-6Google Scholar
Dorjee, T. (2015). The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: A Strategic and Historical Analysis. Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
Doucerain, M., Amiot, C. E., Thomas, E., & Louis, W. R. (2018). What it means to be American: Identity inclusiveness/exclusiveness and support for policies about Muslims among U.S.-born Whites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18(1), 224–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12167Google Scholar
DowntonJr, J., & Wehr, P. (1998). Persistent pacifism: How activist commitment is developed and sustained. Journal of Peace Research, 35(5), 531–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343398035005001Google Scholar
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Cocking, C., Beale, J., Hanson, C., & Rapley, F. (2005). The phenomenology of empowerment in collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 309–28. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604x18523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231Google Scholar
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.xGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Stott, C., & Farsides, T. (2003). The role of police perceptions and practices in the development of ‘public disorder’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(7), 1480–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01959.xGoogle Scholar
Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20(3), 611–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00159Google Scholar
Duncan, L. E. (2012). The Psychology of collective action. In Deaux, K. & Snyder, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupuis, D. R., Wohl, M. J., Packer, D. J., & Tabri, N. (2016). To dissent and protect: Stronger collective identification increases willingness to dissent when group norms evoke collective angst. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638535Google Scholar
Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. M. (2015). Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 116–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch6Google Scholar
Edwards, B. , McCarthy, J. D., & Mataic, D. R. (2018). The resource context of social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., & McCammon, H. J. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 79–97.Google Scholar
Ellefsen, R. (2016). Judicial opportunities and the death of SHAC: Legal repression along a cycle of contention. Social Movement Studies, 15(5), 441–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1185360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellefsen, R. (2018). Deepening the explanation of radical flank effects: Tracing contingent outcomes of destructive capacity. Qualitative Sociology 41(1), 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-018-9373-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.xGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1086–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230Google Scholar
Ferguson, N., McDaid, S., & McAuley, J. W. (2018). Social movements, structural violence, and conflict transformation in Northern Ireland: The role of loyalist paramilitaries. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000274Google Scholar
Ferree, M.M., & Mueller, C. (2004). Feminism and the women’s movements: A global perspective. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 116–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103Google Scholar
Fetner, T. (2008). Taking to the streets: Protest and direct democracy. In Fetner, T. (ed.), How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttvb8dGoogle Scholar
Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, K.S., Hornsey, M.J., Thai, H.A., & Toh, L.L. (2019). Using ingroup messengers and ingroup values to promote climate change policy. Climatic Change, 158, 181–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02561-zGoogle Scholar
Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003Google Scholar
Flack, P., & Ferguson, N. (in press). Conflict transformation: Relinquishing or maintaining social identity among former loyalist combatants in Northern Ireland. Political Psychology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pops.12694Google Scholar
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn‐out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.xGoogle Scholar
Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269.Google Scholar
Gallego, A., & Oberski, D. (2012). Personality and political participation: The mediation hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34(3), 425–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9168-7Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with Unjust Authority. Belmont, CA: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gattinara, P., & Pirro, A. L. (2019). The far right as social movement. European Societies, 21(4), 447–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494301Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The Big Five Personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 265–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659Google Scholar
Giddings, P. J. (2009). Ida A. Sword among Lions: Ida B. Wells and the Campaign Against Lynching. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 371–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.371Google Scholar
Global Witness (2018). At What Cost? Irresponsible Business and the Murder of Land and Environmental Defenders in 2017. London: Global Witness.Google Scholar
Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2008). Public opinion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 477–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‐analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.Google Scholar
Gomes, M. E. (1992). The rewards and stresses of social change: A qualitative study of peace activists. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 32(4), 138–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167892324008Google Scholar
Goodwin, J., & Pfaff, S. (2001). Emotion work in high-risk social movements: Managing fear in the US and East German civil rights movements. In Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 282–302. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304007.003.0017Google Scholar
Gordijn, E. H., de Vries, N. K., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attributions, and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1315–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236819Google Scholar
Gouws, A., & Coetzee, A. (2019). Women’s movements and feminist activism. Agenda, 33(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1619263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, K. H., Quinn, E. A., & Louis, W. R. (2011). Appealing to common humanity increases forgiveness but reduces collective action among victims of historical atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 569–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.802Google Scholar
Gulliver, R., Chapman, C. M., Solly, K. N., & Schultz, T. (2020). Testing the impact of images in environmental campaigns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101468Google Scholar
Gulliver, R., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2019). Understanding the outcomes of climate change campaigns in the Australian environmental movement. Case Studies in the Environment, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2018.001651Google Scholar
Gulliver, R., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. (2020). The characteristics, activities and goals of environmental organizations engaged in advocacy within the Australian environmental movement. Environmental Communication, 14(5), 614–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1697326Google Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. (1986). Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ha, S. E., Kim, S., & Jo, S. H. (2013). Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34(4), 511–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12008Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2010). The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power. Milton Park:Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, L. E., Tropp, L. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12220Google Scholar
Heinisch, R., & Mazzoleni, O. (2016). Understanding Populist Party Organisation: The Radical Right in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heumann, S., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2015). When and why religious groups become political players. In Jasper., J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S., Leeper, T., & Tilley, J. (2020). Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of the Brexit referendum. British Journal of Political Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125Google Scholar
Hopgood, S. (2006). Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. D., Khan, S. S., Tewari, S., Srinivasan, N., & Stevenson, C. (2016). Explaining effervescence: Investigating the relationship between shared social identity and positive experience in crowds. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1015969Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (2008). From profiles to pathways and roots to routes: Perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 618(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208317539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, J., Altier, M. B., Shortland, N., & Taylor, M. (2017). Walking away: The disengagement and de-radicalization of a violent right-wing extremist. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2016.1156722Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., & White, K. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1701–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.xGoogle Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). ‘You can criticize because you care’: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(5), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212Google Scholar
Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6Google Scholar
Hoskin, R. E., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2019). Transnational contact and challenging global poverty: Intergroup contact intensifies (the right kind of) social identities to promote solidarity‐based collective action for those low in social dominance. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.24Google Scholar
Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.xGoogle Scholar
Jäckle, S., & König, P. D. (2017). The dark side of the German ‘welcome culture’: Investigating the causes behind attacks on refugees in 2015. West European Politics, 40(2), 223–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1215614Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquet, J. (2017). Guilt and shame in US climate change communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361Google Scholar
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. M. (2019). Linking arenas: structuring concepts in the study of politics and protest. Social Movement Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1679106Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Monterey County, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Jiménez‐Moya, G., Spears, R., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & de Lemus, S. (2015). By any means necessary? When and why low group identification paradoxically predicts radical collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 517–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12126Google Scholar
Johnson, E.W., Agnone, J., & McCarthy, J.D. (2010). Movement organizations, synergistic tactics and environmental public policy. Social Forces, 88(5), 2267–92. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0038Google Scholar
Jones, S. G., & Libicki, M. C. (2008). How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons from Countering Al-Qa’ida. London: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633Google Scholar
Karácsony, G., & Róna, D. (2011). The secret of Jobbik: Reasons behind the rise of the Hungarian radical right. Journal of East European & Asian Studies, 2(1), 61–92.Google Scholar
Kidd, L. R., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Mills, M., Camilleri, A. R., Fidler, F., & Louis, W. (2019). Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature. Biological conservation, 236, 92–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020Google Scholar
Kim, W. (2016). Economic globalization, inequality, and protest movements under capitalist political regimes, 1970–2007. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57(5), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715216673414Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., De, Weerd, M., Sabucedo, J. M., & Costa, M. (1999). Injustice and adversarial frames in a supranational political context: Farmers’ protest in the Netherlands and Spain. In Della Porta, D. & Kriesi, H. (eds.), Social Movements in a Globalizing World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 134–47.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300606Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–31. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2095297.pdfGoogle Scholar
Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2012). Empathic distress fatigue rather than compassion fatigue? Integrating findings from empathy research in psychology and social neuroscience. In Oakley, B., Knafo, A., Madhavan, G., & Wilson, D. S. (eds.), Pathological Altruism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 368–83.Google Scholar
Kohn, S. (2014). Tibetan nonviolence. Peace Review, 26(1), 62–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.876318Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The Three Pillars of Radicalization: Needs, Narratives, and Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., & Allen, A. M. (2017). The social psychology of the Black Lives Matter meme and movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 543–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417719319Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289729Google Scholar
Lejano, R. P., & Dodge, J. (2017). The narrative properties of ideology: The adversarial turn and climate skepticism in the USA. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9274-9Google Scholar
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2009). Power games: Environmental protest, news media and the internet. Media, Culture and Society, 31(4), 579–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335201Google Scholar
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2012). The power of the unseen: Environmental conflict, the media and invisibility. Media, Culture and Society, 34(7), 847–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712452772Google Scholar
Livingstone, A. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9(1), 121–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.851404Google Scholar
Livingstone, A., Spears, R., Manstead, A.S.R., & Bruder, M. (2009). Defining common goals without speaking the same language: Social identity and social action in Wales. In Wetherell, M. (ed.), Theorizing Identities and Social Action: Identity Studies in the Social Sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246942_13Google Scholar
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Masser, B. M., Hornsey, M. J., & Iyer, A. (2020). You’re making us all look bad: Sexism moderates women’s experience of collective threat and intra-gender hostility toward traditional and non-traditional female subtypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1368430220913610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220913610Google Scholar
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., Wilcockson, B., Amiot, C. E., Moghaddam, F. M., & McGarty, C. (2021). How collective action failure shapes group heterogeneity and engagement in conventional and radical action over time. Psychological Science, 32(4), 519–35.Google Scholar
Lopez, I. F. H. (2001). Protest, repression, and race: Legal violence and the Chicano movement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(1),205–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R. (2009). Collective action – and then what? Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 727–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.xGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R. , Amiot, C. E. , Thomas, E. F. , & Blackwood, L. (2016). The ‘activist identity’ and activism across domains: A multiple identities analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 242–63.Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Chonu, G. K., Achia, T., Chapman, C. M., & Rhee, J. (2018). Building group norms and identities in societal transitions from democracy to dictatorship and back again. In Wagoner, B., Bresco de Luna, I., & Glaveanu, V. (eds.), The Road To Actualized Democracy: A Psychological Exploration. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press, 27–57.Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2010). Speaking out on immigration policy in Australia: Identity threat and the interplay of own opinion and public opinion. Journal of Social Issues, 66(4), 653–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01669.xGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Mavor, K. I., & Terry, D. J. (2003). Reflections on the statistical analysis of personality and norms in war, peace, and prejudice: Are deviant minorities the problem? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 189–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00025.xGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., & Montiel, C. J. (2018). Social movements and social transformation: Steps towards understanding the challenges and breakthroughs of social change. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000309Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D. M., & Neil, T. (2004). Cost-benefit analyses for your group and yourself: The rationality of decision-making in conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(2), 110–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022909Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D., & Douglas, R. (2005a). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 355–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205056465Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Thomas, E., Chapman, C. M., Achia, T., Wibisono, S., Mirnajafi, Z., & Droogendyk, L. (2019). Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members’ charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12436Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lizzio-Wilson, M., Amiot, C., & Moghaddam, F. (2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(S1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12671Google Scholar
Maass, A., Clark, R. D., & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120107Google Scholar
Macy, J. (2007). World as Self, World as Lover: Courage and Global Justice and Ecological Renewal. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.Google Scholar
Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 451–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208095400Google Scholar
Margetts, H. Z., John, P., Hale, S. A., & Reissfelder, S. (2015). Leadership without leaders? Starters and followers in online collective action. Political Studies, 63(2), 278–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12075Google Scholar
Marsden, S. V. (2016). Reintegrating Extremists: Deradicalisation and Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mazumder, S. (2018). The persistent effect of US civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 922–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12384Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, G. (2003). The Media and the Growth of Neo-Populism in Contemporary Democracies. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18(5), 413–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590924765Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777934Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm-conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212464234Google Scholar
McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Conflicting norms highlight the need for action. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512453992Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.xGoogle Scholar
McGarty, C., Thomas, E., Blink, C., Musgrove, L., & Bliuc, A. (2006). Linking social identity, opinion, emotion, and interaction to produce long-term opinion change. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 39.Google Scholar
McKimmie, B. M., Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., Manstead, A. S., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2003). I’m a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.214Google Scholar
McNair, B. (2017). An Introduction to Political Communication (6th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metze, T., & Dodge, J. (2016). Dynamic discourse coalitions on hydro-fracking in Europe and the United States. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 365–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The Psychology of Dictatorship. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). The Psychology of Democracy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2018). Mutual radicalization: How Groups and Nations Drive Each Other to Extremes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Monaghan, J., & Walby, K. (2012). ‘They attacked the city’: Security intelligence, the sociology of protest policing and the anarchist threat at the 2010 Toronto G20 summit. Current Sociology, 60(5), 653–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112448470Google Scholar
Mooijman, M., Hoover, J., Lin, Y., Ji, H., & Dehghani, M. (2018). Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 389–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541Google Scholar
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508Google Scholar
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2011). The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2011.581835Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Radical right parties in Europe: What, who, why? Participation, 34(3), 12–15.Google Scholar
Muis, J., & Immerzeel, T. (2017). Causes and consequences of the rise of populist radical right parties and movements in Europe. Current Sociology, 65(6), 909–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117717294Google Scholar
Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media and Society, 4(4), 2056305118807911. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911Google Scholar
Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all Normies: The Online Culture Wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the Alt-Right and Trump. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.Google Scholar
Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 27(8), 985–1002.Google Scholar
Norton, T. , & Grecu, N. (2015). Publics, communication campaigns, and persuasive communication. In Hansen, A. & Cox, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London: Routledge, 374–87.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E., & Hopkins, N. (2018). Framing a ‘social problem’: Emotion in anti‐abortion activists’ depiction of the abortion debate. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 666–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249Google Scholar
Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. American Sociological Review, 59(5), 703–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orazani, S. N., & Leidner, B. (2019). A case for social change in Iran: Greater support and mobilization potential for nonviolent than violent social movements. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000349Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2018). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 244–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522Google Scholar
Packer, D. J. (2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20(5), 546–48.Google Scholar
Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., & Anderson, M. (2020). Amid protests, majorities across racial and ethnic groups express support for the Black Lives Matter Movement. Retrieved from: www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/06/12/amid-protests-majorities-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups-express-support-for-the-black-lives-matter-movement.Google Scholar
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100602Google Scholar
Platow, M. J., Eggins, R. A., Chattopadhyay, R., Brewer, G., Hardwick, L., Milsom, L., Brocklebank, J., Lalor, T., Martin, R., Quee, M. & Vassallo, S. (2013). Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Non‐instrumental voice and authority group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 361–76.Google Scholar
Pratt, D. (2015). Islamophobia as reactive co-radicalization. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 26(2), 205–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.1000025Google Scholar
Ray, R. (2020). Setting the record straight on the Movement for Black Lives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(8), 1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1718727Google Scholar
Rees, J. H., & Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 466–73.Google Scholar
Reicher, S., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, N., & Levine, M. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.291Google Scholar
Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., Levine, M., & Rath, R. (2005). Entrepreneurs of hate and entrepreneurs of solidarity: Social identity as a basis for mass communication. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(860), 621–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100184462Google Scholar
Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478Google Scholar
Richter, L., Cordner, A., & Brown, P. (2018). Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds. Social Studies of Science, 48(5), 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718799960Google Scholar
Robbins, T. (1984). Constructing cultist ‘mind control’. Sociological Analysis, 45(3), 241–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3711480Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M. (2015). The rise of the populist radical right in Western Europe. European View, 14(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0347-5Google Scholar
Runciman, W. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Cheung, W. Y. (2015). Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 539–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). The advocacy coalition framework: Assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners. In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 211–36.Google Scholar
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 623–45.Google Scholar
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164354Google Scholar
Schulte, M., Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Rollin, P. (2020). Social identity as a key concept for connecting transformative societal change with individual environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101525.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.xGoogle Scholar
Sharp, G. (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action (vol. 1). Boston: Sargent Publisher.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 993–1010.Google Scholar
Simcox, R., Stuart, H., & Ahmed, H. (2010). Islamist Terrorism: The British Connections. London: The Henry Jackson Society.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Grabow, O. (2010). The Politicization of migrants: Further evidence that politicized collective identity is a dual identity. Political Psychology, 31(5), 717–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00782.xGoogle Scholar
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–31. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.4.319Google Scholar
Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Feinberg, M. (2018). Does violent protest backfire? Testing a theory of public reactions to activist violence. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118803189Google Scholar
Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005Google Scholar
Smith, J., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001Google Scholar
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behavior relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647–66. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X269748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2009). Group norms and the attitude–behaviour relationship. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00161.xGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. G., Blackwood, L., & Thomas, E. F. (2020). The need to refocus on the group as the site of radicalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 327–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885870Google Scholar
Smith, L. G., Livingstone, A. G., & Thomas, E. F. (2019). Advancing the social psychology of rapid societal change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12292Google Scholar
Smith, L. G., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2015). ‘We must be the change we want to see in the world’: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12180Google Scholar
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In Klandersman, B., Kriesi, H., & Tarrow, S. G. (eds.), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Soares, M., Barbosa, M., & Matos, R. (2018). Police officers’ perspectives on state (police) violence: A sociomoral and psychological-driven study on disengagement. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 174–204. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.597Google Scholar
Sotirov, M., & Winkel, G. (2016). Toward a cognitive theory of shifting coalitions and policy change: Linking the advocacy coalition framework and cultural theory. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 125–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9235-8Google Scholar
Spears, R. (2010). Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X481308Google Scholar
Staggenborg, S. (1998). Social movement communities and cycles of protest: The emergence and maintenance of a local women’s movement. Social Problems, 45(2), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097243Google Scholar
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., & Kessler, T. (2013). Leader performance and prototypicality: Their inter‐relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 606–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1985Google Scholar
Stephan, M. J., & Chenoweth, E. (2008). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. International security, 33(1), 7–44.Google Scholar
Stock, P. V. (2014). The perennial nature of the Catholic Worker farms: A reconsideration of failure. Rural Sociology, 79(2), 143–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12029Google Scholar
Stott, C., Livingstone, A., & Hoggett, J. (2008). Policing football crowds in England and Wales: a model of ‘good practice’?. Policing and Society, 18(3), 258–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802091641Google Scholar
Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (2011). Mad Mobs and Englishmen? Myths and Realities of the 2011 Riots. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., & Donaghue, N. (2018). ‘I don’t really want to be associated with the self-righteous left extreme’: Disincentives to participation in collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 242–70. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.567Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., Donaghue, N., & Russell, A. (2013). ‘We may be pirates, but we are not protesters’: Identity in the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Political Psychology, 34(5), 753–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12016Google Scholar
Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223Google Scholar
Subasic, E., Schmitt, M. T., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 707–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.xGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–38.Google Scholar
Sweetman, J., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Pratto, F., & Saab, R. (2013). ‘I have a dream’: A typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 293–320.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, 33–47.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2007). Contentious politics and social movements. In Boix, C. & Stokes, S. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0019Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tausch, N., Saguy, T., & Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 536–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12127Google Scholar
Teixeira, C. P., Spears, R., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2019). Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups’ reactions to low-status groups’ collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5):919–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000195Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Bury, S. M., Louis, W. R., Amiot, C. E., Molenberghs, P., Crane, M. F., & Decety, J. (2019). Vegetarian, vegan, activist, radical: Using latent profile analysis to examine different forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 836–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218824407Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Doing democracy: The social psychological mobilization and consequences of collective action. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01047.xGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. (2014). Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1988Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2018). Giving versus acting: Using latent profile analysis to distinguish between benevolent and activist support for global poverty reduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12228Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 356–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2094Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1988Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Reese, G., Berndsen, M., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2016). Where there is a (collective) will, there are (effective) ways: Integrating individual- and group-level factors in explaining humanitarian collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12), 1678–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216669134Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Stuart, A., Smith, L. G., & Bourgeois, L. (2019). Reaching consensus promotes the internalization of commitment to social change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 615–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218780320Google Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Rathmann, L., & McGarty, C. (2017). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: Different forms of identity, emotion, and belief predict victim support volunteerism among nominal and active supporters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(4), 213–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12428Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In Giugni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (eds.), How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 253–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt706Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uluğ, Ö. M., & Acar, Y. G. (2018). What happens after the protests? Understanding protest outcomes through multi-level social change. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000269Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002Google Scholar
van Dyke, N., & Amos, B. (2017). Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, 11(7), e12489. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12489Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2009). Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 645–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.xGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 277–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690238Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504Google Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.xGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M. , Spears, R. , Fischer, A. H. , & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–64.Google Scholar
Vehlken, S. (2013). Zootechnologies: Swarming as a cultural technique. Theory, Culture and Society, 30(6), 110–31.Google Scholar
Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270Google Scholar
Wagoner, B., Moghaddam, F. M., & Valsiner, J. (2018). The Psychology of Radical Social Change: From Rage to Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wasow, O. (2020). Agenda seeding: How 1960s Black protests moved elites, public opinion and voting. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000009XGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.xGoogle Scholar
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249Google Scholar
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Belanger, J. J., & Gelfand, M. J. (2017). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111Google Scholar
Webber, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). The social psychological makings of a terrorist. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 131–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.024Google Scholar
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2007). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In Fischer, F. & Miller, G. J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis Group, 123–36.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., Jong, J., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, Á., Bastian, B., Kavanagh, C. M., & McKay, R. (2017). The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences. Scientific Reports, 7, 44292. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44292Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M., & Swann, W. B. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17783–5.Google Scholar
Williamson, V., Trump, K. S., & Einstein, K. L. (2018). Black Lives Matter: Evidence that police-caused deaths predict protest activity. Perspectives on Politics, 16(2), 400–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717004273Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 647–67.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group – from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994Google Scholar
Zaal, M. P., Laar, C. V., Ståhl, T., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 670–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02069.xGoogle Scholar
Zak, P. J., & Barraza, J. A. (2013). The neurobiology of collective action. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00211Google Scholar
- 17
- Cited by