Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:21:54.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The lived body, everyday and generative powers of war: toward an embodied ontology of war as experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Tanya Narozhna*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: t.narozhna@uwinnipeg.ca

Abstract

This paper examines the emergence of the corporeal turn in International Relations (IR) research on war. It argues that a lack of a sustained ontological investigation leaves open two theoretical gaps, which impedes the development of an embodied theory of war: (1) the core concept of a body and its linkages with war are underdeveloped, and (2) existing research on the embodiment of war slips into discursivism or empiricism. The paper invites the corporeal turn scholarship to bring ontology to the forefront of IR war research and to expand a pool of theoretical resources for analyzing the corporeality of war by turning to existential phenomenology. With the phenomenological concept of the lived body placed at the heart of war ontology, war is conceived as a complex social institution with the generative powers born out of the capacity of the violent politics of injury to disrupt the lived bodies' sense-making and agential capacities, on the one hand, and the potential of individuals and communities to reclaim their interpretive integrity and agency through embodied everyday practices, on the other.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alison, Miranda. 2009. Women and Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak, and Brighton, Shane. 2011. “Powers of War: Fighting, Knowledge and Critique.” International Political Sociology 5 (2): 126–43.10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00125.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2018. War in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Rachel. 2015. “Staging Auschwitz, Making Witnesses: Performances Between History, Memory and Myth.” In History, Memory and Performance, edited by Dean, David et al. , 153–68. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna. 1999. An Intimate History of Killing: Face-to-Face Killing in Twentieth Century Warfare. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine. 2009. The Scientific Way of Warfare: Order and Chaos on the Battlefields of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine, Grove, Jairus, and Shah, Nisha. 2020. “Becoming War: Towards a Martial Empiricism.” Security Dialogue 51 (2–3): 99118.10.1177/0967010619895660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighton, Shane. 2011. “Three Propositions on the Phenomenology of War.” International Political Sociology 5 (1): 101–05.10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00122_6.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Hansen, Lene. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. 2006. On War. Champaign, Ill: Project Gutenberg [Ebook #1946], translated by Col. J. J. Graham. Available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1946/1946-h/1946-h.htmGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol. ed. 2013. Women and Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. 1996. “Realism, Positivism and Historicism.” In Approaches to World Order, edited by Cox, Robert W., and Sinclair, Timothy J., 49–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent Into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James. 2009. Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203881538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, Michael, and Reid, Julian. 2001. “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 4166.10.1177/03058298010300010501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, James. 2014. “On the Concept of Violence: Intelligibility and Risk.” In Phenomenologies of Violence, edited by Staudigl, Michael, 3563. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Eibuszye, Suzanna. 2015. Memory is Our Home. Loss and Remembering: Three Generations in Poland and Russia 1917–1960s. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2010. Nimo's War, Emma's War: Making Feminist Sense of the Iraq War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520945951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2014. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Second edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520957282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson Baaz, Maria, and Stern, Maria. 2013. Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War? Perceptions, Prescriptions, Problems in the Congo and Beyond. London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350222557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511664267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel. 1996. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Final Solution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Grant, Rebecca. 1992. “The Quagmire of Gender and International Security.” In Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, edited by Spike Peterson, V., 8397. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Gregory, Derek. 2015. “Gabriel's Map: Cartography and Corpography in Modern War.” In Geographies of Knowledge and Power, edited by Meusburger, Peter, Gregory, Derek, and Suarsana, Laura, 89121. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9960-7_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Derek. 2018. “Eyes in the Sky – Bodies on the Ground.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (3): 347–58.10.1080/21624887.2018.1432534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hockey, John. 2013. “On Patrol” The Embodied Phenomenology of Infantry.” In War and the Body: Militarization, Practice and Experience, edited by McSorley, Kevin, 93105. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Mediations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, translated by D. Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book, translated by F. Kersten, Collected Works, Vol. II. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2008. “Making Sense of Masculinity and War.” Men and Masculinities 10 (4): 389404.10.1177/1097184X07306740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans. 2003. War and Modernity: Studies in the History of Violence in the 20th Century, translated by R. Livingstone. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Junger, Sebastian. 2010. War. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Ben. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501722011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, Helen. 2020. “Sleeping Soldiers: On Sleep and War.” Security Dialogue 51 (2–3): 119–36.10.1177/0967010619897243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Doquesne University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeish, Kenneth. 2013. Making War at Port Hood: Life and Uncertainty in a Military Community. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400846290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPhee, Graham, and Naimou, Angela. 2016. “‘What the World Looks Like’: On Banality and Spectacle.” College Literature: A Journal of Critical Literary Studies 43 (1): 321.10.1353/lit.2016.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managhan, Tina. 2012. Gender, Agency and War: The Materialized Body in US Foreign Policy. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203126189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McScorley, Kevin. ed. 2013. War and the Body: Militarization, Practice and Experience. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203081419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSorley, Kevin. 2014. “Towards an Embodied Sociology of War.” The Sociological Review 62 (S2): 107–28.10.1111/1467-954X.12194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSorley, Kevin. 2020. “Sensate Regimes of War: Smell, Tracing and Violence.” Security Dialogue 51 (2–3): 155–73.10.1177/0967010619893231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2003. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, Translated by C. Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid, and Öberg, Dan. 2015. “Targeting the Ontology of War: From Clausewitz to Baudrillard.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (2): 392410.10.1177/0305829814552435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1998. “Terror Warfare and the Medicine of Peace.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 12 (1): 103–21.10.1525/maq.1998.12.1.103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parashar, Swati. 2013. “What Wars and ‘War Bodies’ Know about International Relations.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2 (4): 615–30.10.1080/09557571.2013.837429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parashar, Swati. 2014. Women and Militant Wars: The Politics of Injury. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203628669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Julian. 2003. “Foucault on Clausewitz: Conceptualizing the Relationship between War and Power.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28 (1): 128.10.1177/030437540302800101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Julian. 2006a. “Life Struggles: War, Discipline and Biopolitics in the Thought of Michel Foucault.” Social Text 24 (1): 127–52.10.1215/01642472-24-1_86-127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Julian. 2006b. “Re-appropriating Clausewitz: The Neglected Dimensions of Counter-Strategic Thought.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 277–95. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491429.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2016. “How the World Stage Makes its Subjects: An Embodied Critique of Constructivist IR Theory.” Journal of International Relations and Development 19 (1): 101–25.10.1057/jird.2015.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2019. “The Problem with Performativity: Comments on the Contributions.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22 (4): 899908.10.1057/s41268-018-0159-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. “Injury and the Structure of War.” Representations 10: 151.10.1525/rep.1985.10.1.99p0402zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2013. Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2016. Women as Wartime Rapists: Beyond Sensation and Stereotyping. New York, NY: New York University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1bj4r7qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Via., Sandra eds. 2010. Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Skjelsbæk, Inger. 2011. The Political Psychology of War Rape: Studies from Bosnia and Herzegovina. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sookermany, Anders. 2011. “The Embodied Soldier: Towards a New Epistemological Foundation of Soldiering Skills in the (Post)Modernized Norwegian Armed Forces.” Armed Forces and Society 37 (3): 469–93.10.1177/0095327X10372594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudigl, Michael. 2006. “The Many Faces of Violence: A Phenomenological Inquiry.” In Phenomenology 2005, Volume 4, Part 2: Selected Essays From Northern Europe, edited by Rainer Sepp, Hans, and Copoeru, Ion, 685716. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
Staudigl, Michael. 2007. “Towards a Phenomenological Theory of Violence: Reflections Following Merleau-Ponty and Schutz.” Human Studies 30 (3): 233–53.10.1007/s10746-007-9057-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. ed. 2011. Experiencing War. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2013. War as Experience: Contributions From International Relations and Feminist Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203100943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. ed. 2015. Masquerades of War. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315749372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2019. Curating and Re-Curating the American Wars in Vietnam and Iraq. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190840556.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taipale, Joona. 2006. “Perceiving the Other: Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on the Genesis of Intersubjectivity.” In Phenomenology 2005, Volume 4, Part 2: Selected Essays From Northern Europe, edited by Rainer Sepp, Hans, and Copoeru, Ion, 735–63. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tiryakian, Edward. 1999. “War: The Covered Side of Modernity.” International Sociology 14 (4): 473–89.10.1177/0268580999014004006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Lauren. 2015. Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199384488.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wool, Zoe. 2015. After War: The Weight of Life at Walter Reid. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Yehuda, Rachel. et al. 2016Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation.” Biological Psychiatry 80 (5): 372–80.10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed