Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T10:42:36.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Simon Batifort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

Simon Batifort
Simon Batifort*
Affiliation:
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In international investment law, some MFN claims mirror the use of MFN in international trade law. Other MFN claims are more expansive and controversial.

Type
The Once and Future Law of Non-Discrimination: Revisiting Most Favored Nation and National Treatment
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 112 , 2018 , pp. 68 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Batifort, Simon & Heath, J. Benton, The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization, 111 AJIL 873 (2018)Google Scholar. See also Symposium on Batifort, Simon and Heath, J. Benton, “The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization,” 112 AJIL Unbound 38 (2018)Google Scholar.

2 UNCTAD’s Reform Package for the International Investment Regime 29–31 (Dec. 2017).

3 See the background materials prepared by the OECD Secretariat for the 4th Annual Conference on Investment Treaties, Treaty Shopping and Tools for Treaty Reform, at 9–11, available at http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/4th-Annual-Conference-on-Investment-Treaties-agenda.pdf.