Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

48 results

Page 1 of 3

  • THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN DATA PROTECTION LAW AND TWO WESTERN CULTURES OF PRIVACY

  • Uta Kohl
  • Journal:
    International & Comparative Law Quarterly / Volume 72 / Issue 3 / July 2023
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    31 July 2023, pp. 737-769
    Print publication:
    July 2023
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Data protection law has emerged as an important bulwark against online privacy intrusions, and yet its status within privacy law remains awkward. Its starting point of protecting ‘personal’ rather than ‘private’ information puts it at odds with privacy more generally. Indeed, in its very design, data protection law caters for the protection of public personal information, or personal information which has attained a degree of publicness through disclosure. Building on James Whitman's comparative privacy study, this article argues that data protection law is not the odd bedfellow of privacy law properly so called but may be understood as a manifestation of the Continental European culture of privacy. Its distinctiveness does not lie in its apparent technicality but in its robust openness to privacy in public—an idea that is alien to the Anglo-American culture of privacy. Whilst these two cultures of privacy have long ‘met’ in different jurisdictions, this article locates their enduring influence and antagonism within three contemporary privacy regimes. By taking the right to be forgotten, as an archetypal privacy-in-public right, in the testing context of spent criminal convictions, the article gauges the comparative openness to such claims, first, of the Court of Justice of the European Union as the authoritative voice on General Data Protection Regulation normativity; secondly, of the US judiciary as committed to the First and Fourth Amendment; and, thirdly, of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its fused Anglo-American and Continental European privacy jurisprudence. It is the latter jurisprudence in particular that highlights the tensions arising from trying to marry the two privacy traditions, or merge data protection and ‘privacy’ law. Yet, these tensions also offer insights and opportunities.

  • 7 - ‘All Data Is Credit Data’: Personalised Consumer Credit Score and Anti-Discrimination Law

  • from Part II - Themes: Personal Autonomy, Market Choices and the Presumption of Innocence
  • Edited by Uta Kohl, Jacob Eisler
  • Book:
    Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politics and Law
    Published online:
    09 July 2021
    Print publication:
    29 July 2021, pp 124-141

  • Summary

    Credit-score models provide one of the many contexts through which the big data micro-segmentation or ‘personalisation’ phenomenon can be analysed and critiqued. This chapter approaches the issue through the lens of anti-discrimination law, and in particular the concept of indirect discrimination. The argument presented is that, despite its initial promise based on its focus on impact, ‘indirect discrimination’ is after all unlikely to deliver a mechanism to intervene and curb the excesses of the personalised service model. The reason for its failure does not lie in its inherent weaknesses but rather in the 'shortcomings' (entrenched biases) of empirical reality itself which any 'accurate' (or useful) statistical analysis cannot but reflect. Still, the anti-discrimination context offers insights that are valuable beyond its own disciplinary boundaries. For example, the opportunities for oversight and review based on correlations within outputs rather than analysis of inputs is fundamentally at odds with the current trend that demands greater transparency of AI but may after all be more practical and realistic considering the ‘natural’ opacity of learning algorithms and businesses’ ‘natural’ secrecy. The credit risk score context also provides a low-key yet powerful illustration of the oppressive potential of a world in which individual behaviour from ANY sphere or domain may be used for ANY purpose; where a bank, insurance company, employer, health care provider, or indeed any government authority can tap into our social DNA to pre-judge us, should it be considered appropriate and necessary for their manifold objectives.

  • 1 - The Pixelated Person: Humanity in the Grip of Algorithmic Personalisation

  • from Part I - Introduction: Theoretical Perspectives
  • Edited by Uta Kohl, Jacob Eisler
  • Book:
    Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politics and Law
    Published online:
    09 July 2021
    Print publication:
    29 July 2021, pp 3-36

  • Summary

    This is the introductory chapter to the edited collection on 'Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politics and Law' (Cambridge University Press, 2021) that explores the emergent pervasive phenomenon of algorithmic prediction of human preferences, responses and likely behaviours in numerous social domains – ranging from personalised advertising and political microtargeting to precision medicine, personalised pricing and predictive policing and sentencing. This chapter reflects on such human-focused use of predictive technology, first, by situating it within a general framework of profiling and defends data-driven individual and group profiling against some critiques of stereotyping, on the basis that our cognition of the external environment is necessarily reliant on relevant abstractions or non-universal generalisations. The second set of reflections centres around the philosophical tradition of empiricism as a basis of knowledge or truth production, and uses this tradition to critique data-driven profiling and personalisation practices in its numerous manifestations.

Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politics and Law
  • Edited by Uta Kohl, Jacob Eisler
  • Published online:
    09 July 2021
    Print publication:
    29 July 2021
  • The most fascinating and profitable subject of predictive algorithms is the human actor. Analysing big data through learning algorithms to predict and pre-empt individual decisions gives a powerful tool to corporations, political parties and the state. Algorithmic analysis of digital footprints, as an omnipresent form of surveillance, has already been used in diverse contexts: behavioural advertising, personalised pricing, political micro-targeting, precision medicine, and predictive policing and prison sentencing. This volume brings together experts to offer philosophical, sociological, and legal perspectives on these personalised data practices. It explores common themes such as choice, personal autonomy, equality, privacy, and corporate and governmental efficiency against the normative frameworks of the market, democracy and the rule of law. By offering these insights, this collection on data-driven personalisation seeks to stimulate an interdisciplinary debate on one of the most pervasive, transformative, and insidious socio-technical developments of our time.

Page 1 of 3